+1 (binding)
--David
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
+1
Doug
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [ ] +1 Gr
+1
Yours, Xuefeng Wu 吴雪峰 敬上
> On 2014年2月11日, at 下午12:27, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Sean McNamara
wrote:
> +1 !!!
>
> On 2/10/14, 9:27 PM, "Chris Mattmann" wrote:
>
> >Hi Everyone,
> >
> >This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> >from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> >the ballot.
+1 !!!
On 2/10/14, 9:27 PM, "Chris Mattmann" wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>
>This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
>from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
>the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
>Thanks!
>
>[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spa
+1
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [ ] +1 Gradua
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apa
+1 (binding)
-Jake
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Spark from the Incubator because..
+1 (binding)
Marvin Humphrey
-
To
+ 1 (binding).
Suresh
On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
+1
Craig
On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [ ] +1 Gr
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Tha
+1
On 2/11/14, 5:08 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Alex Karasulu
>wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Mosharaf Chowdhury <
>> mosharafka...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > --
>> > Mosharaf Chowdhury
>> >
+1
-- Joyce
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted belo
+1
Dan
On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [ ] +1
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Mosharaf Chowdhury <
> mosharafka...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > Mosharaf Chowdhury
> > http://www.mosharaf.com/
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 P
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Mosharaf Chowdhury wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Mosharaf Chowdhury
> http://www.mosharaf.com/
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Matei Zaharia >wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> >
+1
On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate
+1!
2014-02-10 20:27 GMT-08:00 Chris Mattmann :
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache S
+1
--
Mosharaf Chowdhury
http://www.mosharaf.com/
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> +1
>
> On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> > from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the
+1
On Feb 10, 2014 8:28 PM, "Chris Mattmann" wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apach
+1
To clarify to others, this is an IPCM vote so only the IPCM votes are binding :)
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Sandy Ryza wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Mark Hamstra wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Everyone,
n).
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:10 AM
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark
ot;general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:10 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
>I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text.
>
>Also, the two scope d
I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text.
Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different:
"related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis
on clusters."
v.
"related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation
and sharing across distributed a
Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for everyone, I’ve
updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to INFRA, we also
now have both pull request postings and comments on them forwarded to the our
mailing list.
snip
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems
Ted and Henry: Thanks for the thoughtful replies and indulging my concerns.
+1 (binding)
--David
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> HI David Nalley,
>
> Thank you for your comment and concern, really appreciate it.
>
> As Patrick had mentioned in his reply, this is not a pe
ator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
>I'm happy to see that my concerns about Spark are being actively
>addressed in a professional non-confrontational manner.
>
>The mismatch between committers and proposed PMC members has been
>r
I'm happy to see that my concerns about Spark are being actively addressed in a
professional non-confrontational manner.
The mismatch between committers and proposed PMC members has been resolved. I
guess the only missing bit is updating the graduation resolution.
The use of git for pull reques
SCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the
Incubator (was Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator)
>Hi Chris,
>
>On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Chris Mattmann
>wrote:
>>... Bertrand, you originally VOTEd +1 until Craig mentioned his concerns
>&g
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>... Bertrand, you originally VOTEd +1 until Craig mentioned his concerns
> about accounts not having been filed. Matei and others immediately
> stepped up (including myself), and explained the situation, and
> filed the accounts. Se
this project
and all of the things they have gotten right about the Apache
community.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Friday, February 7, 2014 5:12 AM
To: Incubator General
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduatio
+1
Agree with Ted here. I would write more but his input is succinct and
right on.
--Paul Ramirez
On 2/6/14 9:32 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue
>with some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:05 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> ...The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the
> community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind
> folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen
> on the mailing list...
Yes - cons
Thanks for describing this, Andrew. We’ll do it as well.
Matei
On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
>> The other option would be to somehow subscribe dev@ through the standard
>> GitHub watcher framework by making it the notification address
>
>
> jclouds does that for the jcl
I agree with Ted that these minor issues can be ironed out especially if
the community is open to constructive criticism as these folks are. IMHO
the health of the community is much more important than minor insignificant
shortcomings. Social development is changing many things and causing
incongru
+1 (binding)
--Andrew
On 2/6/14 10:51 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote:
+1 (binding)
Fully agree with Ted's view on the Spark community.
On 02/07/2014 06:32 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1 (binding)
These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the
issue with some committers not notic
+1 (binding)
Fully agree with Ted's view on the Spark community.
On 02/07/2014 06:32 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1 (binding)
These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue with
some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is actually due to a
better submissi
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:05 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the
> community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind
> folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen
> on the mailing list. That's a pretty
HI David Nalley,
Thank you for your comment and concern, really appreciate it.
As Patrick had mentioned in his reply, this is not a persistent problem.
The reminder I sent was about particular topic which could be
interpreted as design or roadmap topic rather than review for a patch.
Rather than
+1 (binding)
These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue with
some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is actually due to a
better submission and review process than most tlp's exhibit.
The spark community has more of the apache spirit in it than mos
Hey All - chiming in as an active Spark committer.
> The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the
> community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind
> folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen
> on the mailing list. That's a pretty f
>
> Hope this helps to ease your concern about Spark podling readiness to
> become TLP.
>
I am a bit conflicted. Part of me is inclined to join Craig, Sebb, and
Bertand and issue a -1. At the same time, there exist many +1s here
from folks that I respect and trust, including the mentors of the
po
> The other option would be to somehow subscribe dev@ through the standard
> GitHub watcher framework by making it the notification address
jclouds does that for the jclouds-mirror user (which is the one that
periodically mirrors the ASF Git repos which are the source of truth to
GitHub). See
I like the idea of sending these to the dev list. I’m going to open an INFRA
ticket for it.
While it seems that the current web hook only sends events when a pull request
is opened or closed, GitHub *can* email watchers for comments as well. I’m
watching the project on GitHub and I get an email
"jfarr...@apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
>Matei
>multiple TLPs using it as their main reviewing system? Outside of JClouds
>I
>am unaware of any others using it currently.
>
>I think this is a good discussion to have, but
iling Gerret was mentioned for git-style code review.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
>
> From: Marvin Humphrey
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 9:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
>
>
> On
9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote:
> How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review
> Board?
One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not.
> If
Matei
multiple TLPs using it as their main reviewing system? Outside of JClouds I
am unaware of any others using it currently.
I think this is a good discussion to have, but we should start another
thread with it so as to not hijack the Apache Spark graduation thread with
it.
-Jake
On Thu, Feb
On 02/06/2014 07:34 PM, Michael Joyce wrote:
> Let's try this again Marvin since you're jumping to the wrong conclusions
> here.
>
> If people are concerned about work on Github not being automatically
> mirrored to ASF mailing lists that's an Infra problem. They should go talk
> to them to help g
Let's try this again Marvin since you're jumping to the wrong conclusions
here.
If people are concerned about work on Github not being automatically
mirrored to ASF mailing lists that's an Infra problem. They should go talk
to them to help get it addressed, which includes the possibility of
contri
Once the mirror is setup and synced to github (24hr window for this
potentially to occur) then one of the Github Apache org admins can setup
the webhook. The project just needs to put in an infra ticket asking for it
-Jake
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> HI Marvin,
>
> T
HI Marvin,
The automatic email to dev@ list for github mirror PR, does it happen
for all ASF github mirrors or each podling need to do some setup to
make it work?
- Henry
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote:
>> How is do
The webhooks are in place to send pr notifications from github to the
dev@lists, the problem is that comments do not get sent only the
actions of
opening and closing of the pr are sent.
-Jake
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Michael Joyce wrote:
> How is doing a review on Github any different
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote:
> How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review
> Board?
One is captured to Apache controlled channels and the other is not.
> If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately mirrored on
> the mailin
This got me to thinking.
If git is the working tool of the team, and actions from the git site are
automatically forwarded to dev, how about putting release votes on git?
Could an action item be created in git by the release manager to release, say,
version 3.4.5 of the code? Voting could be do
Having developer/committer comments from a github review automatically show up
on dev@ lists will ease my concern that the git activities somehow avoid the
"if it isn't on the mail lists, it didn't happen" requirement.
Craig
On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:08 AM, Michael Joyce wrote:
> How is doing a rev
How is doing a review on Github any different than doing a review on Review
Board? If there's concern that work on Github isn't being adequately
mirrored on the mailing lists then that sounds like an Infra problem to me.
There are plenty of hooks [1] that makes this easy to do and, if I'm not
mista
>
> If you look at the GitHub code reviews
> (https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pulls), you'll see that lots of
> people are contributing to reviewing. But I agree that the new committer
> onboarding process should include having them do a test commit.
>
Matei:
Reviews being done on gi
Hi Craig,
On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Hi Craig,
>>
>> Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts.
>> I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were
>> thus never added to the repo.
>
> This is a significant
> What I meant by this is that all code is reviewed by another committer and
> merged by them. Different projects operate differently, but I believe this is
> a very normal way to operate. I’ve been a committer on Apache Hadoop, one of
> the most active Apache projects, since 2009, and nearly al
Thanks so much to sebb, Craig, Bertrand for catching the issue.
Will work with Apache Spark PPMCs to resolve it.
- Henry
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Craig L Russell
> wrote:
>> ...Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICL
Hi Craig,
I am one of the mentors for Spark podling.
Currently the Spark operates via the ASF Github mirror to do review
and commit requests.
The podling uses the Github pull requests mechanism, please see how to
contribute page [1]
By definition ASF committers are people who CAN commit code to
Hi Matei,
On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts.
> I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus
> never added to the repo.
This is a significant failure of
or.apache.org"
Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 9:05 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
>Hi Matei,
>
>On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
>
>> Hi Craig,
>>
>> Thanks for
atience.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 1:34 AM
To: Incubator General
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator
>On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Cra
On 4 February 2014 20:26, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> Thanks for the list, I'm following up with these folks to get them accounts.
> I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus
> never added to the repo. A couple of questions:
>
> - What do you mean by
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the list, I’m following up with these folks to get them accounts. I
think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus
never added to the repo. A couple of questions:
- What do you mean by “does not appear to be a committer” — that they weren’t
add
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> ...Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers;
> some have not
> even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the original proposal but
> have not contributed
> to the project during incubation...
Ouch.
-1 for this resolution as written.
Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers; some
have not even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the original
proposal but have not contributed to the project during incubation.
Regards,
Craig
On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:0
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:06 AM, sebb wrote:
> > ...There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above...
>
> That's a problem indeed, please fix the resolution to use all
> @apache.org addresses. They are used for example to let
>
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:06 AM, sebb wrote:
>> > ...There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above...
>>
>> That's a problem indeed, please fix
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:06 AM, sebb wrote:
> ...There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above...
That's a problem indeed, please fix the resolution to use all
@apache.org addresses. They are used for example to let
https://whimsy.apache.org/ validate the IDs.
+1 for graduation apart
On 1 February 2014 02:04, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well.
+1
best luck, guys!
On 01/02/14 03:04, Matei Zaharia wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as wel
On Jan 31, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as
+1 -C
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this ha
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion
> thread:http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen
+1
-Jake
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this
+2
On Feb 1, 2014 1:15 PM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote:
> +1
>
> Patrick
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia
> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache
> incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apa
+1
Patrick
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make t
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as
+ 1 (binding).
Suresh
On Jan 31, 2014, at 9:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 02/01/2014 02:00 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aE
+1 (already voted on the community thread)
On 02/01/2014 02:00 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http
+1
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happ
86 matches
Mail list logo
