On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2014, at 07:54 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
> That collective database is then generally used to produce works that
> are a produced work of the database of geocoding results as part of a
> collective database.
I find the definition of "g
Hello Alex,
Alex Barth writes:
I just updated the Wiki with a proposed community guideline on geocoding.
Please review:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Geocoding_-_Guideline
Thank you for working on these legal guidelines. A task the typical
developer is not keen to wo
Am 11.07.2014 14:40, schrieb Stephan Knauss:
..
> A while ago there was a discussion about the word "geocode" which seems
> to be a trademark in some jurisdictions. So opposed to the general term
> "geocoding" the word "geocode" might need to be used with care.
>
Yes, correct, Alex can you
hi, I believe the proposal is very biased towards non-open.
with citations it must also include 4.6 of ODbL. so it means triggering
share-alike clause (if it's derivative db).
so wording "As Geocodes are a Produced Work, they do not trigger the
share-alike clauses of the ODbL. " is totally again
Hi,
On 07/11/2014 04:41 PM, Michal Palenik wrote:
> so wording "As Geocodes are a Produced Work, they do not trigger the
> share-alike clauses of the ODbL. " is totally against section 4.6.
This was something that we often discussed during the license change -
what if somebody uses produced works
> Am 11/lug/2014 um 16:41 schrieb Michal Palenik :
>
> so wording "As Geocodes are a Produced Work, they do not trigger the
> share-alike clauses of the ODbL. " is totally against section 4.6.
+1
the data contained in produced works remains ruled by ODbL / share alike, this
is stated in 4.3:
We're 100% in grey territory on geocoding and you can keep reading the
ODbL in circles.
> “Produced Work” – a work (such as an image, audiovisual material, text, or
> sounds) resulting from using the whole or a Substantial part of the Contents
> (via a search or other query) from this Database,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
> We're 100% in grey territory on geocoding and you can keep reading the
> ODbL in circles.
Yes, and thanks a lot Alex for taking the lead in writing up these
guidelines. I think a lot of value in this discussion will come from
well defined examp
On Jul 11, 2014, at 04:11 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
What I'm looking for a is a clear interpretation by the community,
supported OSMF, an interpretation that is a permissive reading of the
ODbL on geocoding to unlock use cases.
Guidelines need to be accurate and supported by the ODbL and shouldn
