Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 at 16:37 Carl Sorensen wrote:That certainly is strange. I wonder why it drops to four dots instead of > 5, given that there are 5 notes in the cluster. And the G space dot would > only be two staff positions away from the E. > > I'm looking into the code now. I'll see if I

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

For the sake of argument, here's what Sibelius does in similar circumstances, and which I think is right, and actually within the spirit of Gould's coments. Chris ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 at 17:33 Carl Sorensen wrote: > > I note that sib1.png is exactly the same chord as in the Gould scan. And > it has two less dots than Gould shows. So it's not consistent with Gould. > I'm not quite sure what she's showing in that example you scanned, but I thought it was a

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On 15 Sep 2016 22:45, "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > > > On 9/15/16 10:41 AM, "Chris Yate" wrote:> > > > >I think the trouble with Gould's rules is that they're inconsistent, or > >could at least be interpreted in such a way. She says to u

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

ensen" wrote: > > > On 9/15/16 4:15 PM, "Chris Yate" wrote: > > > > >Please note I'm working without her examples, but I disagree about > >[Lilypond's interpretation of] Gould's rules, because they appear to be > >in contradiction wi

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On 18 Sep 2016 17:37, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > > > > OK, I have rewritten the code for augmentation dot positioning. > > Great, and thanks a lot! > > > Personally, I like the results of this code better than the Gould > > recommendations. I would use this code, and make the default value > > of

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 02:31 Carl Sorensen wrote: > On 9/18/16 4:00 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > >Chris, > > > >Here's a patch. But as Werner pointed out, it's not quite done yet. I > >think I need to improve the badness scoring in order to get better > >configurations from which to remove exc

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 09:38 Chris Yate wrote: > On 9/18/16 4:00 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote: >>> >Chris, >>> > >>> >Here's a patch. But as Werner pointed out, it's not quite done yet. I >>> >think I need to improve the b

Re: Building Lilypond on Ubuntu 16.04

On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 at 10:14 Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > What I did was: > > > > $ sudo ln -s /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config > /usr/include/freetype2/config > > $ sudo sed -i 's|/freetype2$|/freetype2/freetype|' > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/freetype2.pc > > $ ./configure > > $ ma

Question: Cross compilation

Hi all, Apologies for the potentially "blindingly obvious" question, bu't having read the devel webpages about compiling Lilypond for mingw/Windows, I'm none the wiser. I can compile for native linux using the gnu make (via the smart-autoconf.sh script). However, I'm trying to track down a crash

Re: Question: Cross compilation

hours on a Core i7 quad core system. > > HTH > > -- > Phil Holmes > > > > - Original Message - > *From:* Chris Yate > *To:* Lilypond-User Mailing List > *Sent:* Monday, September 26, 2016 6:54 PM > *Subject:* Question: Cross compilation > > Hi all, > >

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote: > Chris Yate writes: > > > Hi Phil, > > > > Sigh... Yes, that's basically the conclusion I'd already come to, but > that > > it seemed such a ludicrous state of affairs that _somebody_ must have a >

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On 26 Sep 2016 20:16, "Phil Holmes" wrote: > > TBH, you'd probably find it far easier to install a Linux VM on your Windows host, and compile the problematic score on that. I've done both, and what I suggest here is what I would do. That's exactly what I've done - I do a lot of my day job with V

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote: > > That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online > compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly > even just to its information/documentation, maybe it _can_ do it > already) are of course welcome:

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 23:05 Chris Yate wrote: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote: > >> >> That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online >> compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly >> even ju

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On 27 Sep 2016 03:59, "David Kastrup" wrote: > > > At a brief look over GUB, the really big question in my mind is why on > > earth it seems to want to build *everything*. > > It wants to be _able_ to build everything, like autoconf. Fine. But Autoconf doesn't ship with makefiles for everything.

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On 27 Sep 2016 18:31, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:. > > > A Lilypond build tool for all platforms to which someone's added half > > a dozen extra unrelated targets (possibly very large ones such as > > OpenOffice) = a terrible idea. > > Thanks! GUB was the first to be so generic that it could be us

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On 25 Oct 2016 3:36 p.m., "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > > > > > At any rate, I have some results from Chris's test file. I have adjusted > the text to contain my assessment of the results. Please let me know if > you disagree with any of my assessments. > > chord-dots-limit = 1 is better in most circ

Re: Augmentation dots reg test

On 29 Oct 2016 04:39, "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > > I have worked some more on the augmentation dot algorithms, including adding the directions (/DotsUp, /DotsDown). > > I would like your opinion on whether the attached regression test, which is different from the current development regression tests

Re: Augmentation dots reg test

The test case isn't ideal (maybe is better than , but I think the dotted minim a needs an individual dot... On 29 Oct 2016 20:21, "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > > > On 10/29/16 3:29 AM, "Chris Yate" wrote: > > > >What happens with your new code with

Re: Augmentation dots regtests

On 2 Nov 2016 06:37, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > > > > 1) The kievan dot for a notehead on a line moved to a space, when it > >should have stayed on a line. > > > > 2) When notes are displayed without a staff, the dot should stay on > >the same level as the notehead, but it shifts up a half

Re: Augmentation dots regtests

On 2 Nov 2016 08:13, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > > > > Does moving the dot-column-engraver to voice sort out the confusing > > horizontal spacing in these situations? First time I've seen that > > and it does interesting things to the positioning of dots. > > Alas, it doesn't work reliably in many

Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator

On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 at 18:03 tisimst wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Kieren MacMillan [via Lilypond] <[hidden > email] > wrote: > > It's *legitimate* in all musical circles, though it's not *embraced* by > all. > > ... as Kieren and I

Re: request for programming advice

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 at 11:10 Gerard McConnell wrote: > Hello, > About 10 years ago I wrote some Java applets which allow a user to test > their understanding of intervals ( > http://homepage.eircom.net/~gerfmcc/interval.html and triads ( > http://homepage.eircom.net/~gerfmcc/chords.html) and minor

Re: request for programming advice

BB that is beautiful On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 at 11:47 bb wrote: > May be that is what you lokk for? > > http://www.vexflow.com/ > > http://www.vexflow.com/vextab/tutorial.html > > Regards BB > > On 07.11.2016 12:25, Chris Yate wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016

Re: Photoscore

Hi Andrew Apologies in advance, I'm going to be *that guy*... ;-) For what it’s worth, I’m a huge fan of Linux, Lilypond and Muse and all the other wonderful **free** tools that we have available BUT if I was in any sense interested in working with a commercial publisher – especially for p

Re: Photoscore

Menu Muzhic wrote: > Hello Chris, > > How does Finale behave in the commercial publishing industry, compared to > Sibelius, in terms of market share? > > Le 28 nov. 2016 à 00:03, Chris Yate a écrit : > > Hi Andrew > > > Apologies in advance, I'm going t

Re: Photoscore

On 27 Nov 2016 23:49, "Urs Liska" wrote: > > > > Am 28.11.2016 um 00:41 schrieb Chris Yate: >> >> Hi Jacques, >> >> I don't know... It seems ridiculous that they have no common format - but it's a relatively tiny industry... But I dou

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 09:11, "David Kastrup" wrote: > > > > > > > You mean, if it doesn't already own you. My father is a retired > professor of theoretical physics who is still publishing. He received a > final draft of such a paper back from a physics journal along with > instructions to put any corr

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 16:13, "Johan Vromans" wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:48:59 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > > > The big houses more or less *exclusively* use Sibelius and Finale in > > parallel, with a very low share still using SCORE and an actually tiny > > share using Amadeus. > > > > Breitkopf ju

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 20:12, "David Wright" wrote: > > > The most important thing in this situation is not to panic. > It's quite possible that only two things have been altered: > the Master Boot Record may have been overwritten, and the > partition types may have been altered in the absence of any > ot

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 21:13, "David Kastrup" wrote: > > > Depending on the importance of the data, Well, that's the knub of it. The ideal situation is that everything you can't afford to lose is stored off site - possibly multiple times. Github, Bitbucket, or other means. I try my best... :) That's eas

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 23:11, "David Kastrup" wrote: >> > > > I don't keep up to date on this stuff, so I'm no authority. All I know is > > that I used to load XP into a VM using parallels and did not ecnounter such > > a problem. > > You don't "encounter" licensing problems unless you actually read > th

Re: Photoscore

On 29 Nov 2016 13:40, "Karlin High" wrote: > > On 11/28/2016 12:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > I thought the Windows EULA protested against being subjected to a VM? > > Buy a Windows full-version retail license for the virtual machine and > you should be good to go. > > Windows 10 EULA (2)(d)(iv)

Re: New LilyPond website

On 29 Nov 2016 01:33, "John Roper" wrote: > > I have thought about the no scripts idea, and I belive that right now, there are not many websites that do not use javascript for some functionality. Wordpress it's self is almost entirely built upon javascript and php and it makes up >25% of all websi

Re: New LilyPond website

Having now looked at it, though only on my phone, I quite like it. But I did have to scroll scroll scroll to read what would be about one page of content. What I saw was a very "sexy" marketing site for Lilypond, and I think it does it justice. However, as someone already sold on the tool, all I

Re: New LilyPond website

On 30 Nov 2016 01:00, "Tim McNamara" wrote: > > > The cosmetic appearance of the web site is most certainly an influential factor in expanding the "mindshare" of Lilypond. Completely agree. > Take me- I am a musician. I know nothing useful about C and it's variants, Scheme, etc. Lilypond mig

Re: New LilyPond website

On 11 Dec 2016 07:23, "David Kastrup" wrote: Werner LEMBERG writes: >>> I just don't think I am the best person for the job. >> >> Roper has finally posted something I agree with. > > Why this unwarranted hostility? His final design was sound, and I > think we should adapt some key elements.

<    1   2