On 18 Sep 2016 17:37, "Werner LEMBERG" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > OK, I have rewritten the code for augmentation dot positioning. > > Great, and thanks a lot! > > > Personally, I like the results of this code better than the Gould > > recommendations. I would use this code, and make the default value > > of chord-dots-limit be 1. > > I agree. > > > I'm attaching a copy of Dots.pdf created with the new code. I have > > not updated any of the markups describing the results, because this > > allows you to better see the differences, I think. > > This looks very good, but there are two glitches, namely 13b and 23b, > which can't be right. 23c looks wrong, too. > > > Werner
Hi Carl, thanks! I'll take a look later today. Would you be happy to send me a patch for the current source code HEAD? (Or just the modified file). I was looking at the current code on Friday to try and understand it, so it would be good to see what you've changed. Also to have a local build with the fix in!! Chris
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
