On 18 Sep 2016 17:37, "Werner LEMBERG" <w...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > OK, I have rewritten the code for augmentation dot positioning.
> Great, and thanks a lot!
> > Personally, I like the results of this code better than the Gould
> > recommendations. I would use this code, and make the default value
> > of chord-dots-limit be 1.
> I agree.
> > I'm attaching a copy of Dots.pdf created with the new code. I have
> > not updated any of the markups describing the results, because this
> > allows you to better see the differences, I think.
> This looks very good, but there are two glitches, namely 13b and 23b,
> which can't be right. 23c looks wrong, too.
Hi Carl, thanks! I'll take a look later today. Would you be happy to send
me a patch for the current source code HEAD? (Or just the modified file).
I was looking at the current code on Friday to try and understand it, so it
would be good to see what you've changed. Also to have a local build with
the fix in!!
lilypond-user mailing list