Hi All,
Below is the initial design draft for Flow aware scheduler.
Pls review the document and provide your valuable feedback.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HDHHxSMtHNWl9_
sWIVoKRaB4zdsb4hT-PKK6sUB708s/edit?usp=sharing
Regards,
Bala
y the application.
>> Once the application receives the incoming packet based on the HW generate
>> flow he might switch the packet to a SW generated flow in the next phase
>> which could be based on a hash generated from set of fields or a "tag"
>> like
>> SPI
t of fields or a "tag" like
SPI index.
Regards,
Bala
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:35 AM, Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Based on the requirements from our customers, we have come across certain
> > limitations in the current scheduler design,
>
Hi,
Based on the requirements from our customers, we have come across certain
limitations in the current scheduler design,
1) Creating a huge number of odp_queue_t is very expensive operation since
each queue contains a context and having millions of queues creates memory
constraints in the platf
This API is being supported in ODP for quite some time. The minimum header
length in the pool is set by the applications and they are usually aware of
the header length supported in the first segment. Hence applications
calling this API should be aware that this will not contain the entire
packet l
re not destroyed. So I
> assume either it should be done there, or the user is responsible for
> retrieving and destroying those queues.
>
The queue created using this mechanism will have to be destroyed by the
implementation. Application will not have to worry about these
implementation crea
hash_proto_t hash_proto;
};
};
>
> --
> Oriol Arcas
> Software Engineer
> Starflow Networks
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In addition configuring the hashing on the pktio interface as Petri
>> suggested, you ca
Hi,
In addition configuring the hashing on the pktio interface as Petri
suggested, you can also configure hashing on CoS.
By configuring hashing on CoS, you can effectively configure hashing for a
particular flow.
Regards,
Bala
On 4 January 2018 at 20:51, Oriol Arcas wrote:
> Bill, Petri, Bogd
My two cents
I personally prefer Proposal 1, since it provides a single branch
(api-next) which gives me a snapshot of the future of master branch.
In case of proposal 2, let's say there are two different branches/PR
for API changes in pktio and queue we will not know how they will look
together
Hi,
IMO We need to add the following enhancements to IPsec if we want to
include handling of Dummy packets and TCP arbitrary padding
Dummy packets
=
1). We need to add bits in odp_ipsec_warn_t to indicate the reception
of dummy packets so that when an IPsec implementation receives an
packet
with DST ip addr 10.10.x.x it will be delivered to queue1 (CoS1) and
the application will have to call odp_queue_deq(queue1) to receive
this packet.
Regards,
Bala
>
> Liron
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bala Manoharan [mailto:bala.manoha...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Frid
onfigured using
odp_pktin_event_queue().
Packets delivered after classification can be received by application
either using odp_queue_deq() or odp_schedule() function depending upon
the dst_queue configured with CoS.
Regards,
Bala
>
> Liron
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bala
Hi,
Both these modes cannot co-exist.
There is a parameter 'classifier_enable' and 'hash_enable' as part of
odp_pktin_queue_param_t which is used to identify whether classifier
or hashing is enabled for a particular pktio interface.
Both classifier and hash configuration are orthogonal and only o
I was hoping my PR for RED will get in soon.
I will work on this bug and get this in before TigerMoth.
Regards,
Bala
On 9 November 2017 at 21:22, wrote:
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2903
>
> --- Comment #10 from Bill Fischofer ---
> Ping to Bala. Still on your to-do list?
>
> --
Hi,
I was on vacation and went through this mail thread just now.
I wasn't sure where to inject my comments hence I am providing them at
the top for clarity.
1). I am not a huge fan of the idea of starting a timer to perform the
SA delete since calculating this timer's timeout will be an issue an
Hi,
I would propose to remove this odp_packet_unshared_length(), from an
implementation point of view this API will require additional software
overhead as this feature is not inherently supported in the HW and
there are concerns when creating multiple references.
If we do not foresee any serious
Yes. This is an implementation bug. Will fix the bug.
Minor correction, when classifier_enabled is set the current design is
to create all the queues in a single shot rather than as needed since
it will create network jitter if queues are created at random.
Regards,
Bala
On 3 October 2017 at 09:5
umentation as is setting
"classifier_enable" is a mandatory field. I will update the test cases
accordingly.
Regards,
Bala
>
>
> Liron
>
>
>
> *From:* Bala Manoharan [mailto:bala.manoha...@linaro.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 27, 2017 04:48
> *To:* Liron Himi
> *
On 26 July 2017 at 01:24, Liron Himi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a few questions/clarifications regarding classification in PKTIO:
>
> 1. As part of the 'odp_pktin_queue_param_t' application should set
> 'classifier_enable' to '1' if classification support is wanted. Is that
> correct?
>
> 2.
On 25 July 2017 at 16:17, Nikhil Agarwal wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Balasubramanian Manoharan
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 8:07 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: [lng-odp] [API-NEXTv4 1/3] api: cla
Regards,
Bala
On 25 July 2017 at 06:51, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Balasubramanian Manoharan <
> bala.manoha...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Enable packet hashing per CoS to be able to distribute incoming packets to
>> multiple queues linked with a CoS.
>>
>> Signed-
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 14 July 2017 at 18:13, Petri Savolainen
wrote:
> Add status ID for warning messages. Outbound inline soft lifetime
> expiration is currently the only source of these events. API spec
> keeps simple when the same warning structure is shared with IPSEC
>
On 14 July 2017 at 19:18, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> > Balasubramanian Manoharan
> > Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 12:12 PM
> > To: lng-odp@lis
On 14 July 2017 at 04:33, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <
> dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> On 13.07.2017 21:20, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Bala Manoharan
&
On 13 July 2017 at 16:25, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> > Github ODP bot
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 5:00 PM
> > To: lng-odp@lists.linaro
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 12 July 2017 at 19:24, Petri Savolainen
wrote:
> Added a parameter for passing salt/nonce for algorithms that
> need it. Currently, only AES GCM needs it with 4 bytes of
> salt. Later on, other cipher (or auth) algorithms may need
> als
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 13 July 2017 at 15:13, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Petri Savolainen
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> > Github ODP bot
On 11 July 2017 at 18:24, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> > Github ODP bot
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 5:00 PM
> > To: lng-odp@lists.linaro
Regards,
Bala
On 15 June 2017 at 19:51, Petri Savolainen
wrote:
> Added packet pool parameters for more fine grained pool
> configuration. The basic usage of the parameters is not changed,
> except that implementation may now round up 'num' by default.
> Application can limit the round up with n
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 16 June 2017 at 16:19, Petri Savolainen
wrote:
> Applies on top of: "[API-NEXT PATCH v2 0/2] IPsec API update"
>
> Input and output of IPSEC operations are packets. Parameter and
> result structures are cleaner when packet arrays are dir
On 16 June 2017 at 21:14, Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Can you please explain the use case for this API?
>
> We already have odp_schedule_order_unlock and odp_schedule_order_lock.
> These APIs can be used to do the same operation.
>
Yes. This API can be interna
Regards,
Bala
On 16 June 2017 at 19:42, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Balasubramanian Manoharan
> wrote:
> > Adds api to release an existing ordered lock and acquire a new lock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
> > ---
> > include/odp/api/spec/schedu
Regards,
Bala
On 15 June 2017 at 23:20, Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 15 June 2017 at 10:58, Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
> > On 15 June 2017 at 20:00, Francois Ozog
> wrote:
> >
> >> I wonder then how packet receive in
>
> FF
>
> On 15 June 2017 at 15:42, Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
>
>> Add on. It is also possible that the pool might not be linked to any pktio
>> eg buffer pools, hence in implementation we can not wait for the pool to
>> be
>> linked to pktio.
>>
t; opportunity the implementation has to fail the pool creation in a
> defined manner.
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
> > Same here. Pool is created during odp_pool_create API.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bala
> >
> > O
Same here. Pool is created during odp_pool_create API.
Regards,
Bala
On 15 June 2017 at 12:36, Nikhil Agarwal wrote:
> Pool is created at odp_pool_create only. You can allocate packets form it
> even before pktio_open.
>
> Regards
> Nikhil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto
On 13 June 2017 at 04:10, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Balasubramanian Manoharan
> wrote:
> > Add random early discard configuration to class-of-service
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
> > ---
> > include/odp/api/spec/classification.h | 44
> +++
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
Regards,
Bala
On 5 June 2017 at 21:52, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
>> Regards,
>> Bala
>>
>>
>> On 5 June 2017 at 18:24, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Stanisla
Regards,
Bala
On 5 June 2017 at 18:24, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Stanislaw Kardach wrote:
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Stanislaw Kardach
>>
>> On 06/05/2017 02:27 PM, Balasubramanian Manoharan wrote:
>>> Adds threshold limit of the pool to the pool parameters.
>>> Thi
Regards,
Bala
On 5 June 2017 at 18:42, Stanislaw Kardach wrote:
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Stanislaw Kardach
>
> On 06/05/2017 02:54 PM, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Stanislaw Kardach wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Stanislaw Kardach
>>>
>>> On 06/05/2017 02:27 PM, B
Regards,
Bala
On 5 June 2017 at 18:02, Stanislaw Kardach wrote:
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Stanislaw Kardach
>
> On 06/05/2017 02:27 PM, Balasubramanian Manoharan wrote:
>> Adds threshold limit of the pool to the pool parameters.
>> This threshold limit is a percentage of total size of the pool.
>>
>
On 31 May 2017 at 14:03, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/include/odp/api/spec/init.h b/include/odp/api/spec/init.h
>
> I think it's better to have a new file for this (feature.h). It may be needed
> also in other parts (of implementation) than init.
>
>
>> index 154c
On 30 May 2017 at 21:24, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On 30 May 2017 at 18:30, Bala Manoharan wrote:
>> On 30 May 2017 at 20:46, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 30 May 2017 at 18:06, Bala Manoharan wrote:
>>>> On 30 May 2017 at 20:30, Githu
On 30 May 2017 at 20:46, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On 30 May 2017 at 18:06, Bala Manoharan wrote:
>> On 30 May 2017 at 20:30, Github ODP bot wrote:
>>> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>>>
>>> Currently odp_crypto_session_create() (unlike other creati
On 30 May 2017 at 20:30, Github ODP bot wrote:
> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>
> Currently odp_crypto_session_create() (unlike other creation functions)
> returns int result with session being returned through pointer argument.
> Replace it with odp_crypto_session_create2 directly returning a s
Regards,
Bala
On 19 May 2017 at 07:23, Balakrishna Garapati
wrote:
> dpdk pmd's require to minatain min, max, inc fields for all
> crypto capabilitites. By making iv_len to feature like dpdk pmd's
> it is easier to create cipher entires in odp based on key_len.
>
> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Gar
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 10 May 2017 at 12:00, Github ODP bot wrote:
> From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>
> RFC4301 marks AH support as MAY instead of MUST. Some platforms might
> skip implementing AH. Thus we should provide capability to allow
> applications to check if AH is act
On 10 May 2017 at 11:00, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On 10.05.2017 20:57, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>> On 05/10/2017 08:14 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>> On 10.05.2017 20:13, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-od
if you
send them to a specific control core/queue then it would cause a
bottleneck. IMO it is better to have them as part of the packet
result.
Regards,
Bala
>
> On 9 May 2017 at 21:37, Bala Manoharan wrote:
>> On 9 May 2017 at 00:04, Bogdan Pricope wrote:
>>> Hi,
>&
On 9 May 2017 at 00:04, Bogdan Pricope wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can we have this event for all cases: sync/async/inline,
> inbound/outbound, soft/hard limits? Lifetime expiration is destined to
> control part of the application... we should be able to process it on
> a different thread/queue.
In the othe
Regards,
Bala
On 3 May 2017 at 18:15, Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> @@ -846,11 +897,91 @@ int cls_classify_packet(pktio_entry_t *entry, const
>> uint8_t *base,
>>
>> *pool = cos->s.pool;
>> pkt_hdr->p.input_flags.dst_queue = 1;
>> - pkt_hdr->dst_queue = co
eed of
transmission.
Regards,
Bala
>
> --
> Oriol Arcas
> Software Engineer
> Starflow Networks
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
>>
>> Can you please share the code as to how are you enqueing packets to
>> odp_tm_queue() are you creating pa
Can you please share the code as to how are you enqueing packets to
odp_tm_queue() are you creating packets of same size?
I would like to know how these packets are enqueued to these 3 queues?
Regards,
Bala
On 2 May 2017 at 18:50, Oriol Arcas wrote:
> Bill, Barry, Bala,
>
> I've been thinking a
On 28 April 2017 at 18:32, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On 28.04.2017 15:32, Bala Manoharan wrote:
>> On 28 April 2017 at 15:41, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 28.04.2017 12:27, Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
On 28 April 2017 at 15:41, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On 28.04.2017 12:27, Peltonen, Janne (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Dmitry
>>> Eremin-
>>> Solenikov
>>> Sent: Friday, April 28,
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
> On 25-Apr-2017, at 4:56 AM, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <
> dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Add proper handling for errors returned by odp_packet_copy_from_pkt().
>>
>> Signed-off-b
Regards,
Bala
On 22 April 2017 at 22:15, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> Add proper handling for errors returned by odp_packet_copy_from_pkt().
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> ---
> platform/linux-generic/odp_crypto.c | 22 +++---
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+
On 21 April 2017 at 02:05, Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
> On 20 April 2017 at 13:54, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>I looked at the shmem pool APIs for allocating smaller chunks of
>>> shared memory. Following are th
Regards,
Bala
On 12 April 2017 at 18:28, Matias Elo wrote:
> Add fields to odp_pool_info_t for maximum number of packets of any length,
> maximum number of minimum length packets, and maximum number of maximum
> length packets.
>
> odp_pool_param_t documentation is updated to reflect these new f
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 15 April 2017 at 07:18, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> Instead of having magic 0-1-2 numbers, let's have the special enum for
> feature support levels (unsupported/supported/preferred).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> ---
> include/odp/
> On 14-Apr-2017, at 11:28 PM, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> wrote:
>> Instead of having magic 0-1-2 numbers, let's have the special enum for
>> feature support levels (unsupported/supported/preferred).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin
Regards,
Bala
On 14 April 2017 at 16:52, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> wrote:
>> Instead of having magic 0-1-2 numbers, let's have the special enum for
>> feature support levels (unsupported/supported/preferred).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry E
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
> On 13-Apr-2017, at 9:13 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
>
> For this series: Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
>
>
>> On 13 April 2017 at 10:14, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>> For this series: Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer
>>
>> This sho
Regards,
Bala
On 3 April 2017 at 15:41, Petri Savolainen wrote:
> Added capability information about maximum number of queues
> and queue sizes. Both are defined per queue type, since
> plain and scheduled queues may have different implementations
> (e.g. one uses HW while the other is SW).
>
>
Regards,
Bala
On 12 April 2017 at 10:05, Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
> On 11 April 2017 at 05:51, Bala Manoharan wrote:
>> On 10 April 2017 at 21:47, Honnappa Nagarahalli
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Bala,
>>> Continuing the discussion from the call, as I mentioned
On 10 April 2017 at 21:47, Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
> Hi Bala,
> Continuing the discussion from the call, as I mentioned in the
> call today, the queues need to hold all kinds of events and not just
> packets. The events need not be defined by ODP (like timeout events)
> also. The applicati
Hi Bill,
I will post a patch implementing this proposal next week.
Regards,
Bala
On 6 April 2017 at 18:07, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> Bala, any idea when this can advance from the RFC stage to a real patch?
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:15 AM, Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
>>
Regards,
Bala
On 6 April 2017 at 00:53, Brian Brooks wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Balasubramanian Manoharan
> wrote:
>> Adds support to spread packet from a single CoS to multiple queues by
>> configuring hashing at CoS level.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
>> ---
>
For this series:
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 30 March 2017 at 15:59, Petri Savolainen wrote:
> Added configuration option for inbound SPI range (for
> lookups). Removed unique SPI requirement and added config
> option for overlap. Added default queue for lookup misses.
> Added SA
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 28 March 2017 at 16:37, Petri Savolainen wrote:
> Checksum insertion has pktio interface level configuration
> options. Per packet override is needed for example when
> L4 checksumming is enabled and application forwards packets.
> Forwarded packets nee
n
"enable_lookup" per SA which when disabled will
remove the SA from any lookup and we can configure the lookup mode as
a global configuration.
Regards,
Bala
>
> Janne
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lis
Regards,
Bala
On 23 March 2017 at 17:40, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>> >
>> > /**
>> > @@ -381,11 +547,29 @@ typedef enum odp_ipsec_lookup_mode_t {
>> > ODP_IPSEC_LOOKUP_DISABLED = 0,
>> >
>> > /** Inbound SA lookup is enabled. Used SPI values must be
>> unique.
Regards,
Bala
On 23 March 2017 at 17:32, Nikhil Agarwal wrote:
> Few initial comments:
>
> - For Mixing inline and async processing must maintain same SA context in HW
> and implementation. In that case, we should shift to async SA creation so
> that while creating an SA, HWinterface can r
Regards,
Bala
On 21 March 2017 at 19:47, Petri Savolainen wrote:
>
> Added support for inline IPSEC processing on packet input and
> output. Inline mode IPSEC and traffic manager cannot be enabled
> (currently) on the same pktio interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
> ---
> include/odp
Regards,
Bala
On 21 March 2017 at 19:47, Petri Savolainen
wrote:
> Added configuration option for inbound SPI range and default
> queue. Added SA disable function and status event for the
> response from it. The same event may be used for e.g. IPSEC
> statistics, etc queries. Improved outbound f
Hi,
This proposal supports both sync and async compression offload in a single
API following the crypto model, IMO We can separate SYNC and ASYNC
compression offload as two different APIs and only add ASYNC compression
offload in the first version and if required we can add SYNC compression
mode a
gment APIs documented in packet.h file to access
the packet.
Regards,
Bala
>
> Regards,
> {Nanda]
>
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 at 15:51 Verma, Shally
> wrote:
>
>> Have a question by chained , do you mean a "Segmented" packets?
>>
>> ---
egards,
Bala
>
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 at 14:01 Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 15 March 2017 at 18:42, Nanda Gopal wrote:
>>
>> *Hi,*
>>
>>
>>
>> *When we pass, odp_crypto_op_params_tparams to odp_crypto_operation
>>
>&g
On 15 March 2017 at 18:42, Nanda Gopal wrote:
> *Hi,*
>
>
>
> *When we pass, odp_crypto_op_params_tparams to odp_crypto_operation
> (), as per the documentation, if we set params-> out_pkt to INVALID, a new
> pkt would be created from the original pkt pool, data copied from original
> pkt a
On 15 March 2017 at 09:35, Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 14 March 2017 at 17:18, Bill Fischofer
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 14 March 2017 at 14:41, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> >> wrote:
>
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan mailto:bala.manoha...@linaro.org>>
> On 13-Mar-2017, at 7:32 PM, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
> Address bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2908 by checking
> the pool capability max packet length and modifying the test in
> test_extend_ref() to account
Hi,
Pls find the architecture document for IPsec inline offload proposal.
https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/document/d/1vwOGNHJcRSiQaHgyRrKhlGxgEw9156Dnna8AmXA7G5k/edit?usp=sharing
Regards,
Bala
For the series: Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 1 March 2017 at 14:57, Petri Savolainen wrote:
> Use conversion function instead of casting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
> ---
> platform/linux-generic/include/odp_packet_internal.h | 5 +
> platform/linux-generic/odp_packet
Regards,
Bala
On 24 February 2017 at 21:43, Matias Elo wrote:
> Previously packet_test_concatsplit() could fail on some pool
> implementations as the pool ran out of buffers. Increase default pools size
> and use capability to make sure the value is valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matias Elo
> ---
>
to API to use the same approach as single?
>
> Thanks
> Dima
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bala Manoharan [mailto:bala.manoha...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:17 PM
> To: Dmitri Epshtein
> Cc: lng-odp-forward; Nir Erez; Mike Holmes
> S
On 16 February 2017 at 13:31, Dmitri Epshtein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of action items from previous meeting I am going to suggest crypto
> APIs with burst support.
>
> But before I would like to confirm my understanding of existing
> odp_crypto_operation() API definition
>
> int odp_cryp
On 9 February 2017 at 21:02, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I still think that packet ref API should be defined so that an implementation
> may fall back to doing packet copy instead of reference to shared data (if it
> simply cannot handle packets by reference). Now after
Hi Dmitri,
Pls see inline..
Regards,
Bala
On 7 February 2017 at 16:46, Dmitri Epshtein wrote:
> Hi Bala,
>
> See inline
>
> Thanks
> Dima
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bala Manoharan [mailto:bala.manoha...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017
Regards,
Bala
On 6 February 2017 at 18:08, Dmitri Epshtein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are two issues in current odp_crypto APIs (file
> $ODP_DIR/include/odp/api/spec/crypto.h)
>
> 1. No support batch/burst for crypto operations
> 2. No support crypto results polling by application in case
Regards,
Bala
On 25 January 2017 at 13:07, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
wrote:
>
> Le 01/24/2017 à 06:11 PM, Bala Manoharan a écrit :
>> On 24 January 2017 at 22:25, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
>> wrote:
>>> Just a quick question about the API.
>>>
>>
On 24 January 2017 at 22:25, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
wrote:
> Just a quick question about the API.
>
> Bala introduced a patch to check/enable loopback mode on interface.
> But the patch adds an "enable_loop" in odp_pktio_config_t and a
> "loop_supported" in odp_pktio_capability_t.
>
> As ther
Hi,
ODP Cavium implementation has not been publicly released.
Regards,
Bala
On 19 January 2017 at 22:23, Mike Holmes wrote:
>
>
> On 19 January 2017 at 11:43, Gyanesh Patra
> wrote:
>
>> There is no link available for the "Cavium implementation" by Support
>> Account on the ODP download page.
There is a lot of code duplication in this example rom
example/traffic_mgmt/odp_traffic_mgmt.c file.
Maybe the common code should be moved or we should reduce the scope of
this example.
Regards,
Bala
On 19 December 2016 at 11:31, wrote:
> From: Xuelin Shi
>
> introduce a new example of traffi
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 13 January 2017 at 11:58, Nikhil Agarwal wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Nikhil Agarwal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Petri
> Savolainen
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 8:16 PM
> To: lng-
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 22 December 2016 at 18:13, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> Address Bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2790 by adding an
> assert. odp_packet_input_index() only returns a negative value if the
> packet did not originate on an I/O interface, which is know
Except for the Minor documentation comment below
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 5 January 2017 at 20:25, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> Introduce three new APIs that support efficient sharing of portions of
> packets.
>
> odp_packet_ref_static() creates an alias for a base packet
>
> odp_pa
Regards,
Bala
On 3 January 2017 at 20:02, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
>> Regards,
>> Bala
>>
>>
>> On 2 January 2017 at 05:10, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>>> Introduce three new APIs that support
This patch got lost somehow. Pls review the same.
Regards,
Bala
On 4 November 2016 at 23:04, Balasubramanian Manoharan
wrote:
> Updates classification configuration documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
> ---
> v2: Incorporates review comments
> include/odp/api/spec/pack
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
On 22 December 2016 at 20:03, Petri Savolainen
wrote:
> Concat and copy_from_pkt operations must be called with src and
> dst packet handles which refer to the same packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
> ---
> include/odp/api/spec/packet.h | 6
1 - 100 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
