* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [snip lengthy Puff tMD discussion]
>
> Well, for what it's worth, I just called a friend of mine who knew
> Peter Yarrow while growing up, and although she has never asked him, I
> have requested that she do so if she speaks to him.
>
> dave, getting
[snip lengthy Puff tMD discussion]
Well, for what it's worth, I just called a friend of mine who knew
Peter Yarrow while growing up, and although she has never asked him, I
have requested that she do so if she speaks to him.
dave, getting this settled.
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Robin Houston wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 04:25:26PM +, Aaron Trevena wrote:
> >
> > ingestion has several downsides - lack of control of dosage (assuming you
> > eat it at a significant lump at a time), longer effects, stronger
> > effects (making it hard to get do
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 04:25:26PM +, Aaron Trevena wrote:
>
> ingestion has several downsides - lack of control of dosage (assuming you
> eat it at a significant lump at a time), longer effects, stronger
> effects (making it hard to get dosage right) and also slow absorbtion.
Though all of
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Redvers Davies wrote:
> > I thought it was about 'chasing the dragon' - ie heating a resinous
> > substance on tinfoil with a lighter and inhaling the fumes, this is
> > probably less bad for you than smoking stuff in a cigarette form. Although
> > hookah pipes with resin are
> I thought it was about 'chasing the dragon' - ie heating a resinous
> substance on tinfoil with a lighter and inhaling the fumes, this is
> probably less bad for you than smoking stuff in a cigarette form. Although
> hookah pipes with resin are probably healthier still.
Myself and a couple of f
>
> On a tangentially related point - I've just overheard someone in the
> office mention the rumour that "Puff, the magic dragon" was "written
> by someone who was smoking a joint". I guess I'm just surprised that
> there are people to whom this fact isn't obvious.
I thought it was about 'chas
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 17 January 2001 11:14
Subject: Re: PIMB T-shirts
> At 17 Jan 2001 10:09:29 +, Dave Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> [Puff the Magic Dragon]
>
Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Jonathan Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On a tangentially related point - I've just overheard someone in the
> > > office mention the rumour that "Puff, the magic dragon" was "written
> > > by someone who was smoking a joint". I guess I'm
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 06:14:27AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
> Which I'd be happy to read in detail if it wasn't for the fscking midi
> of the tune blasting out and letting everyone in the office know
> exactly what I'm doing.
>
> Dave...
> [who wishes that Netscape had a "no multimedia at all.
At 17 Jan 2001 10:09:29 +, Dave Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Puff the Magic Dragon]
> Snopes has this to say:
>
> http://www.snopes2.com/music/songs/puff.htm
Which I'd be happy to read in detail if it wasn't for the fscking midi
of the tune blasting out and letting everyone in th
Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:17:29 + (GMT), Mark Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Quite frankly I'd rather not piss of O'Reilly. IMHO they're a nice
> > company that do nice things and the legality of the issue really has
> > nothing to do with it.
* Jonathan Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On a tangentially related point - I've just overheard someone in the
> > office mention the rumour that "Puff, the magic dragon" was "written
> > by someone who was smoking a joint". I guess I'm just surprised that
> > there are people to whom thi
> On a tangentially related point - I've just overheard someone in the
> office mention the rumour that "Puff, the magic dragon" was "written
> by someone who was smoking a joint". I guess I'm just surprised that
> there are people to whom this fact isn't obvious.
It's not obvious! I listened to
At Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:17:29 + (GMT), Mark Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite frankly I'd rather not piss of O'Reilly. IMHO they're a nice
> company that do nice things and the legality of the issue really has
> nothing to do with it.
I think this is a _very_ good point.
On a tangen
* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > discussion about legal aspects re using a camel smoking a joint
> >on a t-shirt.
>
> If these are private individuals selling t-shirts, may I suggest just
> omitting the word 'perl' from anywhere on the t-shirt. Then O'Reilly's
> trademark iss
> discussion about legal aspects re using a camel smoking a joint
>on a t-shirt.
If these are private individuals selling t-shirts, may I suggest just
omitting the word 'perl' from anywhere on the t-shirt. Then O'Reilly's
trademark issues don't even come into effect (See page 'iv' of Pro
* Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> people just seem to
> want *nix boxen configured these days :-/
>
sounds like the start of a song
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
An entity claiming to be Alex Page ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
:
: IANAL, but AFAIK parody is protected under trademark law, as long as you're not
:making profit (I presume beer money for the hassle of T-shirt making is excusable).
:
Parody is protected under copyright law (fair use), not trade
From: "Matthew Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cripes, just remembered, I owe paulm UKP10 for the PIMB one! Next time I
see
> you, paul.
A different paulm? I haven't made any Ts yet (except for yapc::Europe) but
have offered since I can get 'em cheap(ish).
> How about some Tees with some of that th
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, you wrote:
> >however, having said that, still like the # , ! , perl one ;-)
>
> that ought to be
>
>
> |\/|
> | \__/ |
> |______|
> \
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:43:00PM +, Robin Houston wrote:
> Don't we have someone here who *is* a lawyer? :-)
More to the point, don't we have someone who could drop a mail to one of the happy
bunnies at O'Rielly and ask them nicely not to sue us?
Alex
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:09:55AM -0500, Alex Page wrote:
> IANAL, but AFAIK parody is protected under trademark law, as long as
> you're not making profit (I presume beer money for the hassle of
> T-shirt making is excusable).
IANAL either, but I think it's quite complicated.
"More interesting
It's been done. But go for it.
http://www.uiowa.edu/~commstud/adclass/camel/images/motorcycle.jpg
(http://www.uiowa.edu/~commstud/adclass/camel/JoeCool.html)
S.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Alex Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:59:44PM +, Redvers Davies wrote:
>
> > There is a temptation
>* Marcel Grunauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> Greg McCarroll writes:
>>
>> >Apparently Amsterdam.pm are looking for a design for YAPC::Europe 2001 ;-)
>> >
>> >however, having said that, still like the # , ! , perl one ;-)
>>
>> that ought to be
>>
>> _
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:59:44PM +, Redvers Davies wrote:
> There is a temptation to insert a joint into the mouth of the "Republic of
> Perl" camel. Of course this would never happen[1].
> [1] Something tells me that would have to be a trademark thing that O'Reilly
> would protect.
IANA
"David H. Adler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 11:37:57AM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
> > David Hodgkinson wrote:
> >
> > > Can I reserve 2 to go to the States? I guess I should enquire about
> > > sizes...
> >
> > Sure, no problem.
>
> Shall I enquire at NY.pm tomorrow
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:32:47PM +, Marcel Grunauer wrote:
> How about "Smoking Perl" for Amsterdam?
"YAPC::Europe::Amsterdam - A Week-Long Hashref"
Alex
[ hash bang perl ]
>(i'll have an XXL simon)
I'll have a medium, Simon.
Cripes, just remembered, I owe paulm UKP10 for the PIMB one! Next time I see
you, paul.
How about some Tees with some of that thar Perl poetry that some of you Real
Programmers write? Hm?
--
matt
I blame the drugs
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:04:42PM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
> "David H. Adler" wrote:
>
> > Shall I enquire at NY.pm tomorrow about demand?
>
> Yup. Might eb up for doing anohter run if necessary.
>
> Plus I have some other ideas.
I think this is one of those instances were
discretion is the
* Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> "David H. Adler" wrote:
>
> > Shall I enquire at NY.pm tomorrow about demand?
>
> Yup. Might eb up for doing anohter run if necessary.
>
> Plus I have some other ideas.
Apparently Amsterdam.pm are looking for a design for YAPC::Europe 2001 ;-)
howev
"David H. Adler" wrote:
> Shall I enquire at NY.pm tomorrow about demand?
Yup. Might eb up for doing anohter run if necessary.
Plus I have some other ideas.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 11:37:57AM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
> David Hodgkinson wrote:
>
> > Can I reserve 2 to go to the States? I guess I should enquire about
> > sizes...
>
> Sure, no problem.
Shall I enquire at NY.pm tomorrow about demand?
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http:/
Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Hodgkinson wrote:
>
> > Can I reserve 2 to go to the States? I guess I should enquire about
> > sizes...
>
> Sure, no problem.
>
> You coming to the Technical Meeting on Thursday?
Yes. Probably.
--
Dave Hodgkinson,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 10:58:36AM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
> Sorry they never got over to the states ... I checked with the Post
> oFfice and the cost was going to be ridiculous to send them Data Post or
> whatever it's called. And because of (and here I quote the guy behind
> the counter when
David Hodgkinson wrote:
> Can I reserve 2 to go to the States? I guess I should enquire about
> sizes...
Sure, no problem.
You coming to the Technical Meeting on Thursday?
Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Hodgkinson wrote:
>
> > Are there any of these left?
>
> Yeah, I've got about 10 or so left I think.
Can I reserve 2 to go to the States? I guess I should enquire about
sizes...
--
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodg
David Hodgkinson wrote:
> Are there any of these left?
Yeah, I've got about 10 or so left I think.
Sorry they never got over to the states ... I checked with the Post
oFfice and the cost was going to be ridiculous to send them Data Post or
whatever it's called. And because of (and here I quote
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:31:27PM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
> Keep me informed. I'll call a meeting.
If they've dried up or $demand > $supply I am happy to do a
run: I have some credits at the place in San Fran that did the
yapc::Europe shirts. I'm starting to think some variation of
Mark F
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:05:54PM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
> And how can we get them to the states? Now that I think of it, do the
> vienna/belfast contingents still have the ones that didn't make it
> here last month? I know at least a couple of ny.pm people want
> them...
Nope - they nev
"David H. Adler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 07:29:31PM +, David Hodgkinson wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to the states "soon" but there's nothing certain.
>
> Keep me informed. I'll call a meeting.
X-)
--
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodg
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 07:29:31PM +, David Hodgkinson wrote:
>
> I'm going to the states "soon" but there's nothing certain.
Keep me informed. I'll call a meeting.
dha
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
"Well, sure, being a ruthless godless dictator is
"David H. Adler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 09:39:07AM +, David Hodgkinson wrote:
> >
> > Are there any of these left?
>
> And how can we get them to the states? Now that I think of it, do the
> vienna/belfast contingents still have the ones that didn't make it
>
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 09:39:07AM +, David Hodgkinson wrote:
>
> Are there any of these left?
And how can we get them to the states? Now that I think of it, do the
vienna/belfast contingents still have the ones that didn't make it
here last month? I know at least a couple of ny.pm people
44 matches
Mail list logo
