Scott Hernandez wrote:
If anything, I would think that the xpath expression language would be a
good start. I'm not sure if I would want an expression language included
with nant though. This could however be an addin, or extension. Adding
expressions (as we have discussed before) seems to me to b
ommunity? Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean
, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a divi
;!(1=1)", false);
Assert("substring('abcde',1,2)='bc'", true);
Assert("trim(' ab ')='ab'", true);
Assert("trimstart(' ab ')='ab '", true);
Assert("trimend(' ab ')=' ab'", true);
Ass
nts in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveSta
From my reading of the docs they are not orthogonal. ie when you are
satisfied that the source is in a releasable state then you add the
rtags so you can always get that version at a later date. Branching
however gives you a seperate dev line which enables you to polish a
release while still ma
ick Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of S
make the
release, it becomes very difficult to manage them all while the current
release is finalised and there is a big risk of those changes being lost.
Ian
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe I'm missing somthing but I'm
I'd just like to ask anyone submitting patches to run the following
astyle command on the sources before posting them:
astyle -j -s4 -o -a -p --convert-tabs
this will enforce most of the nant coding guidelines with regard to formatting and layout and makes the reviewer/committers job much easier
onate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
t?
I'll propose something like this:
...
What's your opinion?
Gius_.
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.
LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http
onate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveStat
looks like you already decided. Thats fine. Sending full paths is good.
Ian
Gert Driesen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
TED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help
After the previous discussion on branching I propose that we adopt a
branching policy and document it on the wiki. I vote for the deferred
branching policy [1] mentioned by Tom in a previous mail.
Since its probably about time to start the 0.8.4 beta release cycle and
I have some changes to com
Done,
thanks Jarek.
Ian
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
Gert, Ian,
Can you include my task (expression evaluator) in releaseplan.html.
The patch contains proposed changes to html.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ian MacLean&qu
IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
------------
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is spo
urceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http:/
s.
I think the commandline wrapper is probably the better way to go
initially - certainly it will be quicker :)
Ian
Mike Roberts wrote:
Ian MacLean wrote:
Bob,
They are. I've gotten a bit sidetracked - and then I had 3 weeks
vacation. Jean Rajotte posted his own simplified version of a p
create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Devel
Hi Damir,
According to an email I found
(http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/14603/2002/9/0/9638108/) the
correct behavior for is to set the included file's basedir
to the basedir of the file including it.
This is not the case. Files should always be included relative to the
file doing the
does anyone use the nant task in the following form :
< nant target="foo" />
ie with no buildfile specified. Currently if no buildfile attribute is
specified it defaults to using the current buildfile to 'make recursive
builds easier' according to the comments. It doesn't check that a target
h
, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division o
Every task should at least output somthing for each unit of work its
doing - unloess its very fine grained. If it outputs nothing then you
never see the [taskname] so its hard to know if that task has run at all.
Ian
Hi again (hope last one today)
I found verbosity level of many tasks very inc
lick Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a divis
rgument for allowing properties in expressions to be written
without "$": Compare:
with
The ugliness factor is close to zero in the latter case, IMHO.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" &
Gert Driesen wrote:
I actually still prefer using the ${foo} syntax as :
- its easier to distinguish properties (as Ian originally said)
I'm happy with either one of Jareks options 2 and 3:
2. if=${length($propertyname)=length($someotherpropertyname)}"
3. if=${length(propertyname)=length(some
apologies. I missed a previous email in the thread. I didn't realize the
choice was between lt and <.
Ian
I also don't think we should use lt, gt, ... instead of ==, > for
operators,
both XSLT and MSBuild use similar operators ... so I don't see why we
should
be different ...
not so. From th
Is anyone actually using numeric property names ? I say we should
dissallow them and be done with it.
Ian
Martin Aliger wrote:
- it won't break compatibility for properties with numeric names (eg
${123})
Can you have properties with such names? What's the use for them? Maybe
they
Sorry - I wrote that the wrong way around. Nant properties are/ have
been macro expansions, meaning that they are simple text substitutions
that occur before any semantic processing of the build file occurs -
similar to macros in C. Xslt's variables are true variables and have an
associated typ
tasklocation('taskname')" instead of
"nant.tasks.TASKNAME.location". Assuming this, there would be no need to
have properties with dashes in them.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" &
sts/listinfo/nant-developers
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-develo
Some interesting discussion by way of John Lams weblog:
http://www.iunknown.com/000371.html
There is also some discussion on the use of conditions among the 3
projects ( msbuild, Ant and NAnt ).
http://stefanbodewig.blogger.de/stories/10616/
thanks Stefan - I didn't realize you had a blog. :)
us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
--
Original Message
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Perforce tasks
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 11:41:08 +0900
From: Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bob Arnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Where did you find that bit of info ?
Ian
Gert Driesen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev]
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sp
Awesome, thanks !
Ian
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
OK. Committed.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:23 AM
Subject: R
us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
h
Jarek,
What does your "custom function loading code" do?
I presume that you want to load functions from external dlls and make them
available to EE.
thats correct. It scans assemblies looking for classes marked with a
special attribute - then loads MethodInfo objects from those classes
into a
In that case I should check when I'm scanning for methods that they are
all lowercase - or we can just map a lowercase name to the correct
methodinfo object. So even if you define the method in code as
void SomeFunc()
it will be mapped to the nant custom function somefunc() and attempting
to
t;test" desctiption="test
function"]
int SomeFunc(int arg)
{
return arg*2;
}
where name and namespace are required attributes?
Martin
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
T
Thanks Nick,
I tracked down the cause of this from an earlier bug report an am
working on fix. Thanks for the detailed report.
Ian
N. V. wrote:
the problem is with resources, sorry!
Another problem with resources, I've discovered that since it creates
a copy of the ressources files with the
Lets hold up till I get the custom function loading stuff committed.
Should be later today or tomorrow.
Ian
What do you think?
Can we merge EE-patches with main branch as soon as we have this semantics
implemented?
Jarek
---
This SF.net emai
LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a divis
? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
elp you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveS
The category could also be implemented using a tag in the xml comments.
The advantage with using an attribute property is that you can get the
compiler to force the property to be set. Not too bothered either way.
Ian
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
The next thing I'll look at is namespace support wh
Good work on the userdoc stuff for functions Jarek. I just built after
syncing your checkins. It looks great - we just need to fill those doc
comments in now. I can see that a category is needed though - that
index page is looking pretty crowede already.
Ian MacLean wrote:
The category could
orge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more producti
FunctionSetAttribute'
- changes to the function index to split functions by category
- maybe we should place this information on each function's reference page
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL
elp us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveS
I don't know - the categories you have suggested all look good. I guess
anything we add thats really core and doesn't fit easily into a
namespace. If everything is in a namespace though - thats fine.
Ian
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
Looks good. There may well be some functions that go un-prefixed -
s mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Givebac
ll send it to that list if you like).
The task is accompanied by 12 tests, and is fully documented.
Best,
Bill
William E. Caputo
ThoughtWorks, Inc.
http://www.williamcaputo.com
----
idia ktesis, koine chresis
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveStat
least 3 tasks, like Ant has : dirname, basename,
and path-combine (or something, doesn't exist in Ant)
What do you think ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William E Caputo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL
functions ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "William E Caputo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Nant-Developers (E-M
+1 on the if task refactoring. I'm not sure about removing
though. I realize that a getenv() function would provide equivalent
functionality, however I like the fact that I just need to do
and then I have access to the environment block without having to call
any more functions. Maybe I have
Sounds good to me.
Ian
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
Should I add Deprecated attribute to "propertyexists", "propertytrue" and
"taskexists" in EE-patches?
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaroslaw Kowal
Hmm - thats got me thinking. Currently we auto load 3 types of nant
objects - Tasks, types and now functions. However there is only the one
corresponding task -
I'm wondering if we should either :
add two extra tasks and
or have scan for all nant objects - it might need renaming in
that case
Yeah,
And now we have an excellent definition of what should be a task and
what should be a function - that we can add to the docs. One of us needs
to play devils advocate - quite often its been me :).
Ian
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
PS. Sorry if I sometimes sound negative about expression suppo
lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more pr
Sounds good to me. Thanks !
Ian
Damir Simunic wrote:
You'd probably want to call it then.
Damir
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian
MacLean
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 4:06 AM
To: Jaroslaw Kowalski
Cc: Nant-Developers (E
_
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tut
Gert Driesen wrote:
It is sufficient to change this line:
to:
But this is not solution of course...
We are aware of this, and we need to look into automatic selection of the
correct framework, but this might not be easy as I don't think its possible
to find out if the
OTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX
x27;s
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/
This is a good thing. We should have enabled this some time ago.
Ian
As a sideefect to enable this I have to enable also use of type-defs in
TaskContainer (used in and )
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an
been redirected to a
file. This is very handy for programs like perforce were the output of the
command is needed to determine build events later on in the script.
The data return for both properties is always that last execution of the process
(for example, if you use retrycount).
James.
--
Ian Ma
Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
___
nant-
Using xpathnavigators for this stuff would be nice. There was an msdn
article a while back implementing an xpathnavigator interface over a zip
file. It would work well for any sort of hierarchical data. +1 on using
some sort of hierarchical storage for task inputs and outputs.
Ian
Scott Hernan
I'll approach them about splitting
that out into its own project. There will be enough there to justify that I
think.
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Nant-Developers (E-mail)"
ginal Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "! nant"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-d
}<br>
[Function("test-func")]<br>
public static string Testfunc( ) {<br>
return "some result ";<br>
}<br>
override the default name here.</pre><br>
<tt>Jarek</tt><br>
<br>
<tt>- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><br>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><br>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:31 PM<br>
l Message -----
From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] custom functions with the script task
Nice.
I also though about
ists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configura
??
Tim Dallmann
?Ó+?ÞéX???'???u??=?ß? J??~??z+-??Z?Ô~??àjv?zg??,???}?xv?q?[??Ü)?q?Zn)b?'?jwZ???q?Z???~t?Z??+??Åçi?zrß? ?Zv???m?_???v???^??h??ì??x%??gj{?u?Þ?^l??.?Ç?? ?w???i+-??(?? ~??{?Þ?b+-?w??v???^
OK - I think we can do without the definefunctions attribute though.
I'll just make the implicit script class a FunctionSet behind the scenes
and remove the constraint that you have to have a "ScriptMain".
Ian
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
that should be doable. The class would automatically have t
t make the implicit script class a FunctionSet behind the scenes
and remove the constraint that you have to have a "ScriptMain".
What about the namespace?
Jarek
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http:/
oblem.
I'm afraid there's no global namespace ;-( And parser does rely on the fact
that every function is prefix::function-name()...
Jarek
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
-
attribute "outputpropertymode". It can be
set to standard, error, or all. The default is all. I've also corrected a small
bug where I was not adding a linefeed to the output.
James.
Quoting Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
James,
This looks good. However I'm wondering i
From: "Rodrigo B. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jaroslaw Kowalski"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] custom functions
This is kind of the msbuild model where you can define inputs and
outputs for a task and therefor it knows what to clean. I think that
going this route would require some sort of task output framework like
the xml stuff that was discussed previously ) rather than adding options
on a task by tas
Interesting. If you look at CompilerBase.cs you can see that it allows
multiple resourceFilesets. This is allows you to use different prefixes
for different groups of files and so fileset merging wouldn't work there.
I'm not sure that multiple filesets in a single copy task is much better
than
What do you think? Should I prepare patch for it?
sure. I'd like to see it.
Ian
Martin
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching ca
Is this the right patch ? if it is possible to have two valid projects
with an identical guid should we use a different key for the hash table
- perhaps a combination of the guid and the projectname ?
Ian
Hi all,
I found one very annoying feature/bug of task:
Projects (.csproj) are loaded in
I'm convinced. Committed.
Ian
I think Martins patch should go in and I love the error message, very
describing giving both
the problem and solution.
/Nicke
Is this the right patch ? if it is possible to have two valid projects
with an identical guid should we use a different key for the hash
Right now it doesn't support remote stylesheets and in fact with recent
changes ( current cvs ) it will give the following error instead:
'http://www.agamura.com/quxo/stylesheets/current/html/chunk.xsl' is not
a valid
value for attribute 'style' of .
The given path's format is not supported.
Gert Driesen wrote:
Giuseppe can always first download the stylesheet to his local filesystem
using the task. This has the advantage that he's able to set both
proxy and authentication information for fetching the file and it would also
increase performance for subsequent transformations.
sur
To be honest I'd like to see us release a 1.0 with the current feature
set before implementing somthing like typed properties.
it would be kinda nice to unify properties and type references which are
both essentially different types of variables. However I do feel that
this is peripheral to wha
Ah - I misunderstood. I agree that a uri backed attribute that allows
local files and can determine modified datetime of remote files would be
great. As you say this would be preferable to relying on xslt's
validation and would keep it consistent with other tasks that use uri's.
Ian
sure thats
Sure this is clean in a mathematical sense but personally I'd rather see
a more verbose layout that actually gives me an idea of what files the
fileset will match just by looking at it. Given that it can be hard to
determine what a given fileset will match right now I imagine it will be
that mu
at about scoped properties?
- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-
-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 January 2004 7:07 AM
To: Jaroslaw Kowalski
Cc: Mitch Denny;
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere
Juliano ,
Did you recompile mono and mcs after installing ICU ?
Ian
Juliano Morais Barbosa wrote:
Hi Ianm.
I get nant-0.84, I get icu-2.8.
I compile and install icu.
When I type make clean && make all I get this:
make clean && make all
rm bin/*.* -f
make bootstrap
make[1]: Entering direct
nd deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
___________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://list
Thanks for your time,
Dustin
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.h
1 - 100 of 661 matches
Mail list logo
