An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071022/fb05b0eb/attachment.html
...@openehr.org
[mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Thurston
Sent: Monday, 22 October 2007 1:32 PM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: Multiple parents and max number of nested specialized
archetypes?
Hi all
I think that in the absence of a template
at openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Lisa Thurston
*Sent:* Monday, 22 October 2007 1:32 PM
*To:* For openEHR technical discussions
*Subject:* Re: Multiple parents and max number of nested specialized
archetypes?
Hi all
I think that in the absence of a template specification it is indeed
difficult to see
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071021/680fc2cd/attachment.html
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071019/86ceb3ed/attachment.html
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OceanC_small.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4972 bytes
)
Heather
From: openehr-technical-boun...@openehr.org
[mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Rong Chen
Sent: Friday, 19 October 2007 2:26 PM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: Multiple parents and max number of nested specialized
archetypes
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071019/5ef1c143/attachment.html
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OceanC_small.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4972 bytes
I should note that in the next generation of archetypes and tooling,
archetype 'source' files for specialised archetypes will be
'differential' in nature - i.e. valid ADL, but containing only added and
changed items from the parent, just as for subclasses in an
object-oriented programming
Hi!
Interesting discussion. I'm hope we can avoid multiple inheritance in
archetype specialisation. It will be interesting to see how far one
can get just using single inheritance and inclusion (clusters etc).
On 10/17/07, Koray Atalag atalagk at yahoo.com wrote:
There are now two alternative
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071018/3535f029/attachment.html
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OceanC_small.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4972 bytes
the archetype
etc.)
Cheers
Sebastian
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sundvall [mailto:erisu at imt.liu.se]
Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2007 5:04 PM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: Multiple parents and max number of nested specialized
archetypes?
Hi!
Interesting
Koray Atalag wrote:
In my former message, with the question of writing down B and A for
spelicalization section of C, I was proposing to write down the names of all
archetypes till the top level in specialization archetype- like an absolute
specialization path. This I think is not true
Erik Sundvall wrote:
Hi!
Can one share important sub-parts without sharing view on process and
structure. If so, will the information entered using the two different
archetypes be computable in a similar way for e.g. decision support
systems.
this is why we have Cluster Structure
: Thursday, 18 October 2007 8:46 AM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple parents and max number of nested specialized
archetypes?
Hi,
I also think we should avoid multiple inheritance - it is complex enough
the way it is - from a tooling as well as from an archetype design point
ah - 'data quality' in other words - i.e. markers / meta-data relating
to the data capture from the source, not the integrity of the data as
represented on the openEHR system?
I would like to expand that to data quality assurance. How can one
objectively and according to locally accepted
.
Heather
-Original Message-
From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical-
bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Erik Sundvall
Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2007 1:00 PM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: Multiple parents and max number of nested
] On Behalf Of Erik Sundvall
Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2007 1:00 PM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: Multiple parents and max number of nested specialized
archetypes?
Hi!
I know that it is technically possible. ;-) I was trying to ask if it
was clinically possible
Dear Graham,
Is multiple inheritance in the use case you presented, the only
solution?
I expect it is not.
So why use it.
When 'data integrity' is a recurring issue in several archetypes, re-
use by inclusion of a 'data integrity' archetype in an other
archetypes is a better other solution.
Grahame Grieve wrote:
At the moment we have not seen any need for multiple inheritance in
archetypes.
I see this as very similar to multiple inheritance in objects.
There is no *need*, but there is useful things that can be done.
The question is whether the price is justified.
The
at openehr.org
Subject: Multiple parents and max number of nested specialized archetypes?
Hi,
I have a question about the referencing of archetypes in specialization.
And also
want to know if there is a limit on the number of specializations of
archetypes.
For example:
A is top level archetype
B
Andrew Patterson wrote:
I should note that in the next generation of archetypes and tooling,
archetype 'source' files for specialised archetypes will be
'differential' in nature - i.e. valid ADL, but containing only added and
changed items from the parent, just as for subclasses in an
Hi Koray,
At the moment we have not seen any need for multiple inheritance in
archetypes. Do you have a particular use case? Note that C specialising
B means that C conforms to B and to A. Nothing special needed to do that.
- thomas beale
Koray Atalag wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about
Hi,
I have a question about the referencing of archetypes in specialization. And
also want to know if there is a limit on the number of specializations of
archetypes.
For example:
A is top level archetype
B is specialization of A
C has to further specialize B
and there is possibility that D
23 matches
Mail list logo