I've just started working at a place that is using Radiant for it's web site
and I've noticed our general pages are usually somewhere around 150kb and
take, on my system, around 800ms. FWIW, just now dslreports showed my
download speed (on my client box) avg at around 5000Kb.
Since it's a small
Rob Levin wrote:
I've just started working at a place that is using Radiant for it's web site
and I've noticed our general pages are usually somewhere around 150kb and
take, on my system, around 800ms. FWIW, just now dslreports showed my
download speed (on my client box) avg at around 5000Kb.
Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
Rob Levin wrote:
I've just started working at a place that is using Radiant for it's web site
and I've noticed our general pages are usually somewhere around 150kb and
take, on my system, around 800ms. FWIW, just now dslreports showed my
download speed (on my client
some things that come to mind immediately:
- make sure you are not serving css and/or js from radiant
- make sure you have mod_deflate setup up to compress all text files
- avoid excessive use of page parts
- avoid using paperclipped or page_attachments for design assets (like
your logo or icons
oh and i'd think 300-400ms or less spent inside the rails process
would be sufficient for all but the most performance critical
applications since your web server should be able to serve the rest of
your page (static assets, css, js) in less than 100ms
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 6:49 PM, john muhl
Mohit:
Are you trying to reduce the 150KB or the 800ms?
I assume we're going to hopefully improve by reducing the 150kb but I'd
still like to proportionally decrease the load time if at all possible.
change the page caching time to a much larger value compared to the
default 5 minutes if your
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Rob Levin roblevinten...@gmail.com wrote:
change the page caching time to a much larger value compared to the
default 5 minutes if your pages can manage it.
Yes, I'm looking in to this. I'm almost positive we're just using the
default. I agree that this may
Rob,
Looking at http://www.snaplogic.com/ the first and biggest thing I
would suggest would be to combine your 7 (not including
ga_tracker) .js files into one.
You could also look into using the google hosted versions of jquery
and mootools.
-Arthur
Hey Rob -
Also think about combining whatever (non-repeating background) images you
have into one sprite file, combining CSS and JS files into one file, for
each respectively. You're going to see a big hit in perceived speed if
you're making that many requests to your web server. Do a fresh
I did not see a clear way to do this and I have some pages that are not
appropriate to show up. Is there a way without hacking a negation regex into
the source?
___
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search:
Hi Rob,
I believe that on each page, clicking the more link under the title
will reveal an option to not have that page searchable.
-Arthur
___
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Thanks. Don't know how I missed that ;)
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Arthur Gunn art...@gunn.co.nz wrote:
Hi Rob,
I believe that on each page, clicking the more link under the title
will reveal an option to not have that page searchable.
-Arthur
Rob,
In addition to the other comments, the use of Google's FireFox plugin, Page
Speed, for tuning up the front-end code would help with reducing load time.
Best regards,
-Bill
On Dec 28, 2009, at 6:17 PM, radiant-requ...@radiantcms.org wrote:
So my questions are: What would be a
13 matches
Mail list logo
