Hello
Ashish wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the information. I still am not entirely
clear about the versioning and have a couple of
questions.
1. As you said, reiserfs is included in the 2.6.7
kernel. Does that mean that the reiserfs bundled with
this kernel has all the latest updates and patches ?
Is ther
Hello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have the latest version of the module_init__tools and modutils?
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/
Jenn
I rally want to test reiser4 - but i have
this problem:
modprobe reiser4:
FATAL: Error inserting reiser
Hello
Cami wrote:
Hi All,
Last night i done monthly maintence on all of my
mailhosts and after doing a reiserfsck, it looks
like i'll have to rebuild the tree on one of my
mail clusters (the other 8 clusters were fine)..
[mailhost01][/root]# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted
Hello
Burnes, James wrote:
Is namesys et al trying for 2.6.8 inclusion for Reiser4?
We are going to send it out for inclusion into mm serie of kernel
jim burnes
security engineer
great-west, denver
The -mm tree is used because -mm stuff goes into mainline and
that's what the Reiser4 people are
Hans Reiser wrote:
Philippe Gramoulle' wrote:
Hello,
Below are results from bonnie++ done on reiser4 and reiserfs.
Each result is an average of 5 runs.
For Reiser4 i used default mkfs options and -o formatting=extents
For Reisefs i used default mount options and -o notails
Assuming that default beh
Hello
Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot
(http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.04).
It is against 2.6.8-rc2-mm2.
It is mostly bug fixes.
Look at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.04/READ.ME for install instructions
Hello
Adrian Ulrich wrote:
1. Only i386 and UML on i386 are supported.
ddabbs: Big endian appears to be supported.
I don't think so.
Mounting a reiser4 partiton on ppc-linux doesn't work
(mount segfaults + kernel Oops)
I created the FS on x86, so it's not the fault of mkfs.reiser4
(I didn't even c
Hello
Markus Törnqvist wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:16:12PM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
So, the problen cannot be fully solved. However, you can re-create all second
level sub-directories and assign another fibration plugins to them.
I've never gotten a real reply this question...
Will
Hello
Markus Törnqvist wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:43:33PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
I think only empty directory can be refibrated.
Are you thinking about implementing it/is it a matter of time and money?
Reiser4 provides plugin mechanism. Everyone is encouraged to write plugins
Hello
Markus Törnqvist wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 02:00:04PM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
simply changes id of fibration plugin associated with foo. Doing this
on non-empty foo would result in corruption and hence is
disabled. Vladimir, as far as I can tell, meant that if one writes
And on a f
Hello
Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot
(http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.13.04).
It is against 2.6.8-rc4-mm1.
Most of changes address warnings Andrew Morton made about patches for kernel reiser4
depends on.
Look at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.13.04/READ.ME for install
Hello
Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 06:23:45PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hello
hi
Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot
(http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.13.04).
It is against 2.6.8-rc4-mm1.
user-space tools are thos of 2004.08.09-internal.testing
Hi
Ian Morgan wrote:
> Any other suggestions, or am I screwed because I have too much RAM?
>
deletion of reachable file should work. Its inode gets removed from hash list.
If that does not work - the files either had more than one link or is still
open. It should be possible to find other links
Hi
Chris Mason wrote:
> > Did you change this to work so? I guess no, because this change would
> > touch not only reiserfs_get_block but few other things.
> > As in 3.5 - every pointer still had to exist. To be more pricise, file
> > can have hole (no indirect items) only at its end.
> >
>
> ye
Hi
Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thursday, May 10, 2001 02:22:39 AM +0400 "Vladimir V. Saveliev"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Chris Mason wrote:
> >
> >> > Did you change this to work so? I guess no, because this change
> >
> > Will have pointers for the first 50 blocks, and have no pointers for the
> > next 50 blocks.
> >
>
> Ok, but how would pap-5710 come up then?
>
Sorry, I sent this not completed.
How would not-numered message inode.c:873: "vs-: reiserfs_get_block: key should
not be found" occur?
>> in the
Hi
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using 2.4.5-pre1. Over the course of the last two weeks I have had
> DMA timeouts occur twice. Both times corrupted my fs. While this is not
> ideal, its not unexpected as things stand now. I have seen at least three
> other reports on lkml about errors
"Manfred H. Winter" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While trying to connect to ftp.reiserfs.org I get the following errors:
>
> ncftp> open reiserfs
> Could not open host ftp.reiserfs.org: invalid reply from server.
> Could not read reply from control connection: Verbindungsaufbau abgelehnt
>
> Are there any pr
Hi
Pierre Etchemaite wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tested reiserfsck 3.0k-pre4, to fix some small but annoying bitmap
> errors (system crash when running apt-get update, yuck). I made a backup before
> running it.
>
> * reiserfsck failed with "sysconf failed : Function not implemented", until
Hi
Krasi Zlatev wrote:
> I have 2.2.16 kernel, I see there is a patch in thte /pub/old-patches
> directory, but it is rather old.
> I would like to use the lastest stable version of reiserfs with that
> kernel, is that possible?
> Thank you.
You might want to take latest patch from
ftp.namesys.
Hi
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> This patch Works For Me (tm), but I have no idea what I'm doing apart from
> using kmap() and kunmap() instead of the allocation we used in the
> original patch Jim made for 2.2.19 :-)
>
> For those wondering, this fixes a readdir() problem for NFS --
> specif
Hi
Jim Ford wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just fitted a bigger disk to my 2.4.4 SMP Abit BP6 system and decided to set it
>up with a reiserf. During the cp of some files from my existing software RAID0
>system, the machine crashed several times
What were reasons of crashes - did you notice?
> and I
Hi
Xuan Baldauf wrote:
> Clemens Koller wrote:
>
> > Hello, folks,
> >
> > I am new on this list... hopefully, this is not an old FAQ entry somewhere
> > (I didn't find anything useful for me for that case)
> >
> > My Problem:
> > I have had a reiserfs partition on a SuSE Linux 7.0 System with i
Hi
Tom Allender wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across a bit of difficultly when I tried to force a fsck on reboot on a
> machine which has some reiserfs partitions marked to be fscked in /etc/fstab.
>
> reiserfsck rejected the -f option and returned a non-zero exit status which
> dropped the machine to
Hi
"Neil Macvicar " wrote:
> Apologies for my incorrect posting earlier.
>
> I am coming across a problem in my system in that when I create any file
> in the / mount (which is reiserfs formatted), it is created with 0666
> permissions, regardless of the umask, which is 022. This behaviour only
Hi
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> I'd like to use ReiserFS with 2.2.19, and got 3 simple questions:
>
> 1. Are there any known issues/problems with ReiserFS 3.5.32 I should be
> aware of ?
>
I would recommend few minor fixes (attached).
>
> 2. What are the differences between ReiserFS for 2.2.x k
Hi
Ragnar Kjørstad wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:12:22AM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> > > 2. What are the differences between ReiserFS for 2.2.x kernels and 2.4.x
> > > kernels as for now ? Except the target kernel version, of course...
> > >
Hi
Ragnar Kjørstad wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:47:51PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> > > > On a filesystem of 3.6 format you can have files longer than 2 gb and have
> > > > more that 64k links to a file.
> > > If you're refering to my pa
Hi
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> ... In case of tails you may even loose some of the information
> that was on disk previously.
No. It should not. If it does - this is a bug.
Thanks,
vs
>
>
> It can be argued if this is good or bad, but it is how it currently
> works, and can be seen in any files
Hi
Ragnar Kjørstad wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 06:41:42AM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> > > * there is no easy way to tell if a particular stat-data is in v1 or v2
> > > format in link.
> >
> > Yes, there is. They have different length.
>
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
>
> > It is doable, but afaics now it looks almost useless as far as st_nlink is 16 bit
> > even in stat64.
>
> glibc uses int for link count (all modes).
> typedef __u_int __nlink_t; /* Type of file
Hi
Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Die, 29 Mai 2001, Gergely Tamas wrote:
> > Did you use quotaon command on this target FS ?
>
> At startup:
>
> [root: ~] quotaon -avug
> quotaon: using /boot-backup/quota.group on /dev/hde3: Invalid argument
> /dev/hde3: user quotas turned on
>
> parts of my fstab
Hi
Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Here are two testcases (created using debugreiserfs -p) where reiserfsck
> fails. For the first one (which is badly damaged),
>
>http://www-isl.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de/reiserfs/md2.bmap.gz 11737
>http://www-isl.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de/reiserfs/md2.gz 14
Hi
Hans Reiser wrote:
> Erik Tews wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Can somebody please tell me what the current status of the lost space
> > bug is? I know that old versions of reiserfs lost free space during
> > crashes. I got a very old reiserfs here (version 3.5) How can I find out
> > if there is s
Hi
Ragnar Kjørstad wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 02:09:57PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > > I was doing some testing of a 53GB reiserfs file system on a machine I am
> > > building to see what the performance was like, and I stumbled across a
> > > problem.
> > >
> > this is bizarre, there is
subscribe
mailing wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, [iso-8859-1] Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, mailing wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, I get the following error from /var/log/message:
> > >
> > > Jun 28 05:06:01 desktop kernel: scsi0: ERROR on channel 0, id 0, lun 0, CDB:
>0x28 00 01 12 f8 03 00 00
Hi
You might want to look over ww.namesys.com's FAQ page. There should be a section like
"How do I setup reiserfs a root partition" or so.
Thanks,
vs
Abu Hudzaefah wrote:
> Ok. I have create new reiser filesystem on /dev/hda4, with mkfs.reiserfs
> but I cannot mount that device .
>
> [root@yus
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 05:03:16AM +0200, Ragnar Kj?rstad wrote:
>
> > If the partition used to hold a different filesystem, you should try to
> > run fsck on it, to see what can be recovered. Taking a backup first
> > could be wise. (a backup of the device)
>
> If it was
Hi
Jörg Spilker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here a part of my syslog:
>
> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/smtpd[2310]: 1F1101536:
> client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin postfix/cleanup[2193]: 1F1101536:
> message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Jun 30 11:33:04 daolin kernel: vs-9020: reiserfs_
Hi
Michael Forstner wrote:
> > Michael Forstner writes:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > if I create a reiserFS partition (doesn't matter if on HDD or ZIP or
> > > something other), I can mount it as user but not write !
> > >
> > > I have tried several settings in /etc/fstab but nothing works!!
Hi
Xuan Baldauf wrote:
> Is there already a "smart readahead" that does readahead on the logical and not
>physical layer? E.g. if
> there a file which is fragmented, readahead should not read beyond a fragment, but
>it should read the
> next fragment ahead.
Yes, generic_fileread never reads b
Hi
Harald Hannelius wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 12:03:03PM +0300, Harald Hannelius wrote:
>>
>>> box[/mnt] # quotacheck -avug
>>> Scanning /dev/sdc1 [/mnt] Hmm, file `/mnt/bigfile'
>>> not found
>>> Guess you'd better run fsck first !
>>>
Hi
Jan Johansson wrote:
> On a RH7.1 system, when booting and it checks root fs it appears to "hang",
> but if you press enter it shows something like "Do you wish to run this
> program [N/Yes] do note the need to type Yes". How do i disable that so it
> automatically checks? I looked trough th
Hi
It is under testing right now. It will probably appear on the web sie
tomorrow/
Thanks,
vs
Philippe Gramoulle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like quota patches didn't make it into 2.4.7.
>
> I hope a quota patch will be available soon as the 2.4.7pre6 patch on
> Gegerly Tamas web site gives
Hi
Marini Stefano wrote:
> About the reiser tools,
> I can't compile the 3.x.0j version under redhat 7.1
> because I obtain an implicit declaration of some function.
>
> Someone Knows what I have to do?
You may want to try to get the rpm:
ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/RPMS/reiserfsprogs-3.
Hi
Chris Mason wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Is there a schedule/map for things that need to happen before 3.x.0k is no
> longer considered a pre release? There's not much point in calling 3.x.0j
> the most recent on the ftp site, we've been pointing users away from it for
> months.
>
3.x.0k is not
Hi
Eoin Verling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That fatal question ... I've deleted something on a reiserFS partition, and I'm
>trying to recover it.
>
> The details, SuSE 7.1, 2.4.6 kernel (reiserFS that comes with distro suse 7.1)
>
> I have a large partition with the deleted file, I brought the machine to
"W. Wilson Ho" wrote:
> Andreas Dilger wrote:
> >
> > > Lastly, if a (single) user process creates files f1, f2, f3, ...
> > > in that order, does the file system guarantee the order of
> > > creation? That is, is it possible that after a journal playback,
> > > that f2 is gone but f1 and
Hi
Hauser Marcel wrote:
> Hi All
>
> hope this is not in any faq I haven't read !!. :)
>
> Question/Problem:
>
> I've currently changed my root partition to reiserfs. At the first boot i
> get the following error message:
> cramfs: wrong magic
> FAT: bogus logical sector size 0
> UMSDOS: msdos_r
Hi
"W. Wilson Ho" wrote:
>
> I now believe it is a reiserfs/kernel bug. I've managed to
> reproduce the bug in the following cases:
>
Ok, it appeared to be a known issue. When getting a problem do you have in your logs
something like:
"vs-: reiserfs_get_block: XXX YYY ZZZ UNKNOWN shoul
k is readable.
So, imho, it does not look like a reiserfs bug.
Thanks,
vs
>
> Cheers Marcel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: vs [mailto:vs]On Behalf Of Vladimir V. Saveliev
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:52
> To: Hauser Marcel
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi
Jeff Wilde wrote:
> I ran into a problem upgrading to the kernel 2.4.9 in that I got file
> size limit exceeded on the following:
>
> -rw-rw1 root root 53812 Aug 30 11:23 radacct.MYD
> -rw-rw1 root root 396383232 Aug 30 11:23 radacct.MYI
>
> It resulted in
David Lloyd wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> > Does the problem lie with tar/dd/etc?
>
> You could try:
>
> #! /usr/bin/perl
>
> my $count;
>
> while ($count++ < [a number of bytes]) {
> `echo "1" >> some_file.test`
> }
>
> That could eliminate the dd, tar thing.
Yes, but dd should also work, even
Hi
Tony Willoughby wrote:
> I've got a system with corrupted files. I can't figure out who the
> culprit is, DRBD or reiserFS. Here's my configuration:
>
> - Two nodes running Red Hat 6.1
> - DRBD Version: 58. Running over eth1 (10/100 ethernet).
> - ReiserFS version 3.5.24
> - Heartbeat 0.4.
Hi
Rosaire AMORE wrote:
> Hi
> I had a /etc/fstab (Linux Mandrake 7.2 - kernel 2.2.17) that contained
> the following lines :
>
> /dev/hda3 / reiserfs notail 1 1
> /dev/hdb6 /ext reiserfs rw,suid,dev,exec,auto,user,async 1 2
>
> Nothing to say about the first one.
Actually, there is something:
Hi
Randall Craig wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a slow modem connection to the internet. Today I was downloading
> a large iso file, which I accidently deleted during the ftp process.
>
> The ftp client continued to write until completion to the files node on
> reiserfs with SuSE 7.2.
>
> Any s
Hi
Herman Knief wrote:
> and I see from some other mail archives, that this is not the first time
> someone has hit this.
>
> I am running SuSE 7.2, Kernel 2.4.7 (from SuSE) w/ ReiserFS as an NFS
> server.
>
Weren't there anything from reiserfs just before vs-3050 started?
>
> Sep 2 09:01:35
Hi
Jimmie Mayfield wrote:
> Hi. I've spent most of the day creating and deleting rather large files (20MB
> on average) on a 2.4.8-ac11 system. A few minutes ago I got a NULL pointer
> OOPS while trying to delete 8 of these files.
>
> Here is the OOPS listing:
> Unable to handle kernel NULL po
Hi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> some days ago I posted a question concerning quotas > 4GB on reiserfs. I
> found that almost everyone uses the newer releases of the quota utilities (those
> from sourceforge), while I still have an old 1.70 (patched for reiserfs)
> doing its work here
Hi
Gerald Hochegger wrote:
> quota -v
>
> Filesystem blocks quota limit grace files quota limit grace
> /dev/sda9 164 0 0 42 0 0
>^^^
>|||
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=20mb bs=1024k count=20
>
> quota -v
>
> Filesys
Hi
Vitalie Cherpec wrote:
> Hello!
>
> How can I find file name who is owner for a specified block
> number?
> Or list of files affected by bad blocks ? I'm using latest reiserfs
> patch for kernel 2.2.19 + latestest reiserfs tools.
>
Currently, reiserfs tools do not have a feature you
Hi
Benjamin Albrecht wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have a Compaq Server and Workstations which are using the storage and
> some other services.
>
> Server:
>
> Compaq Prolaint
> 4x700MHz
> 1.5GB RAM
> 5x9GB SCSI && SmartArray Raid Controller
> 9x36GB SCSI && SmartArray Raid Controller
> Debian Linux (woody
Hi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've just recently upgraded from 2.4.1 with ReiserFS utils a to 2.4.8
> ReiserFS utils j.
>
> Things went well, although I haven't been able to convert my filesystems
> from 3.5. to the new 3.6 yet.
>
> Anyhow, I'm seeing data corruption and my box
Hi
Jeff Soule wrote:
> I am experiancing a problem with reiserfs and linux kernel 2.4.9 and the
> ac10 patch :-(
>
> The problem started as soon as I upgraded from 2.4.7. I was copying a
> large file (Over 2 Gig) when cp froze to the point where I could not
> even kill it with a kill -9 and had
Hi
Maik Holtkamp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have following machine:
>
> ---config---
> SuSE 7.1 (kernel 2.4.6)
> Promise PDC20265 on A7V
> hda:
> Model=Maxtor 34098H4, FwRev=YAH814Y0, SerialNo=L41YXCCC
> hdb:
> Model=IBM-DTLA-307030, FwRev=TX4OA60A, SerialNo=YKEYKMJ4510
> ReiserFS version 3.5.29
> /d
Hi
Jeff Soule wrote:
> OK this seems to have done the trick. I sucessfuly copied a file
> 2246934528bytes long. It did appear to take longer then I expected to
> copy the file. This is subjective since I did not time it and compaire
> to previous file copies of the same length...
>
> Was this
Hi
Timothy Reaves wrote:
> I would like to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.5 to 2.4.9. What patches, if
> any, do I need? Thanks!
2.4.10-pre4 got some reiserfs changes including fix for possible filesystem
corruption during writing to a hole of file.
Thanks,
vs
Hi
Jens Benecke wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:31:59PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> > Timothy Reaves wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.5 to 2.4.9. What
> > > patches, if any, do I need? Thanks!
> >
Hi
Ronald Moesbergen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing some weirdness when checking filesystems.
> When I check my 3.6.25 reiserfs filesystem with reiserfschk3.x.0j, I get no
> errors, but
> when i use reiserfschk3.x.0k-pre9, I get the following:
>
Yes, this is a bug in reiserfsck from 3.x.0k-p
Hi
"Philip R. Auld" wrote:
> Hi all,
> Unix fs semantics allow for a file to be unlinked while it is still open.
> Given a system crash it is then possible for a file to exist, consuming space,
> but
> not to be pointed to by any directory. On ext2 after the crash we would run fsck
> and
Marcel Kunath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have come upon something confusing to me.
>
> I own a new 17 gig Seagate drive and put it into a Linux box. I went ahead and
> did:
>
> mkreiserfs /dev/hdb
> mount -t reiserfs /dev/hdb /drive2
>
> No problems.
>
> I as well own a WDC 450AA drive which is not ne
Hi
Matthew Fletcher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry i am new to this list, but i need to ask a question quikly,.
>
> Being one of those unfortunate soals, who only just found out that 2.4.3 has
> "DANGER" written next to it, i would quite like to know some details about the
> problem,..
>
As far as I re
Hi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've got a kernel 2.4.10-pre13, (I tried with 2.4.7 patched, 2.4.9...), software
> raid5, nfsd and I cant use quotas...
> with the 2.4.7 patched, I could use 'usrquota' in fstab, but quotas were not
> functionnal.
> with 2.4.10-pre13, the 'usrquota' option is invali
Hi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi...
>
> I had an Oops under kernel 2.4.9, I believe it is from reiserfs.
>
> I was doing ./configure under kdelibs-2.1.1 trying to make and install it
> when this occured. the kdelibs directory is located in a reiserfs partition.
> When the oops happens, I can't i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:41:03 +0400
> "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you ./configure again - does it oops?
> > If yes - can you please ksymoops(8) the dump?
>
> it does oops, and in the same place,
Hi
James Troup wrote:
> I installed reiserfs on all my partitions except /boot
>
> When it boots it comes to Reiserfs checking / and just sits there with
> "will put log info to stderr" forever until you hit ENTER key.
>
> Anyone seen this?
>
Probably, reiserfsck awaits for confirmation from yo
Hi
"Jonas Jensen (by way of Jonas Jensen ) (by way of Jonas Jensen )"
wrote:
> One of my reiserfs disks became corrupted last week, and it's still causing
> me problems. I'll try to describe it in full detail, hoping that this problem
> can be fixed for good.
>
> The disk in question is a Linux
Hi
Brian DeShong wrote:
> Below are the specs of our box:
>
> Dell PowerEdge 4400
> Dual P3-866
> 1GB RAM
> RedHat Linux, Kernel 2.2.16-22
> 200GB RAID 5 array
>
> Here is the current df output for the box:
>
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda1
Hi
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does this point at anything? This happened running dbench with 2.4.11-pre2 working
> on a reiserfs on an LVM (1.01-rc2) volume. The prempt patch is also applied.
>
> Oct 3 17:41:56 oscar kernel: printing eip:
> Oct 3 17:41:56 oscar kernel: d680a49c
> Oct 3
Hi
Ok, I think I understand now: you concern about whether it is reliable to have
reiserfs filesystem filled up to 100%?
That should not cause any problems like file corruptions (but -ENOSPC, of
course).
But, it is known that it is not a good idea to allow filesystem to be that full
all the time.
Hi
>> A problem like this could be caused by a "shared objectids".
>> What happened there is that two files got the same objectid.
>They shouldn't have, right?
Yes.
>> You can try to find such files, make their new copies them, remove
>> originals, and rename copies to originals.
>That doesn'
Hi
Liu Tao wrote:
> I am using 2.4.12 and all my partions are reiserfs.
> Atfer a dirty reboot caused by an accident when i was using vim,
> a bad .viminfo appears in my home directory.
> Is that fs's fault?
>
It depends from what did happen with that file right before crash.
If vim wrote into
Hi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know the difference between the r5, tea and rupasov hash
Well, there is some well hidden documentation about it.
If you will get
ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.2/linux-2.2.18-reiserfs-3.5.30-patch.gz
and unpack it with
zcat linux-2.2.18-reiserfs-3.
Hi
Pierre Etchemaite wrote:
> Le 18-Oct-2001, Greg Ward écrivait :
> >> just performance wise i think an unlink to a new
> >> directory everytime a file is deleted will slow the fs down
> >
> > I would have thought intra-filesystem moves were pretty fast, but again
> > I know nothing about FS in
Hi
Harald Barth wrote:
> > I do not think so. The problem probably appeared not recently, but
> > some time ago. But, if you found a reliable way (either with this
> > arlad or with something else) to get files sharing one objectid that
> > would help us to find this bug.
>
> It took only 6 hour
Hello, Linus, Alan
This patch makes reiserfs to return -EINVAL when remount failed because of wrong
options specifed.
Please apply
diff -rup linux-2.4.13-pre5/fs/reiserfs/super.c linux-2.4.13-pre5-1/fs/reiserfs/super.c
--- linux-2.4.13-pre5/fs/reiserfs/super.c Fri Oct 19 19:15:21 2001
+
Hi
Gunnar Raetsch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got problems with hard links when using the kernel-nfsd and
> reiserfs. The nfs server gives e.g. the following error messages
>
> Oct 25 08:59:09 hebb kernel: nfsd Security: sbin/init bad export.
> Oct 25 08:59:10 hebb kernel: nfsd Security: bin/bash
Hi
Nikita Danilov wrote:
> Benjamin Scott writes:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I am new to ReiserFS, and this list, so my apologies for posting a
> > possibly annoying message, but I am looking at putting ReiserFS into
> > production soon, and I would like to run a few things by the expert
Benjamin Scott wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am new to ReiserFS, and this list, so my apologies for posting a
> possibly annoying message, but I am looking at putting ReiserFS into
> production soon, and I would like to run a few things by the experts here.
> (I also have some questions regard
Hi
Benjamin Scott wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> As I mentioned in my message entitled "New to ReiserFS...", I have some
> questions regarding the mkreiserfs utility and the choice of hash function.
> I have Linux kernel 2.2.19, reiserfs 3.5.34, and reiserfsprogs 3.x.0j. I am
> looking at the manu
Hi
Marcus Alanen DC wrote:
> Hi! We are experiencing a small problem using reiserfs.
> Currently there is one file which can't be accessed.
>
> [root]# ls -1 4113.
> ls: 4113.: Permission denied
> [root]# ls -1 | grep 4113\.
> 4113.
> [root]#
>
> Also any stat, cat etc. doesn't work, but the fil
Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is slightly cosmetic, but easy to fix...
>
> blocks on device 10241432
> 2171432 blocks marked used in on disk bitmap
> Pass 0 - 0% left 2171431,
> ...20%...40%...
Hi
Marco Bizzarri wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all.
>
> I'm using reiserfs 3.5.32, with kernel 2.2.19, quota-1.70 on a RH 6.2
> system.
>
> We have a problem here when we tryied to activate user and group
> quotas.
>
Do you mean quotaon?
>
> The problem is th
"Vladimir V. Saveliev" wrote:
>
> The latest reiserfs for 2.2 is 3.5.34. Although, iirc, the difference between
> then are rather cosmetic.
>
I just looked for differences between 3.5.32 and 3.5.34. The last one contains
few fixes - including fixes in quota support. S
Hi
Emanuel Quass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this is the right mailinglist, but I hope someone can point
> me the right way.
>
> I just created a snapshot of a reiserfs-filesystem. When I try to mount it,
> the mount fails and there is a entry in /var/log/messages:
>
> Nov 13 16:25:35 serve
Hi
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> No when I make the snapshot (of my root partn) its rw.
How do you provide that at that time there are transactions to be replied?
snapshot is read-only device so it will not be mounted if there are transactions
to be replied.
> I have been using this
> method the chech
Nikita Danilov wrote:
> Vladimir V. Saveliev writes:
> > Hi
> >
> > Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> >
> > > No when I make the snapshot (of my root partn) its rw.
> >
> > How do you provide that at that time there are transactions to be replied?
Chris Mason wrote:
> On Friday, November 16, 2001 07:02:37 PM +0300 "Vladimir V. Saveliev"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> >
> >> No when I make the snapshot (of my root partn) its rw.
> >
>
Hi
C S Ong wrote:
>Part 1.1Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
>Encoding: quoted-printable
> is there any windows program that can browse reiserfs partition ?
namesys did not do anything in that direction and did not hear anything
about anybody's attempt to do that.
Thanks,
vs
1 - 100 of 401 matches
Mail list logo
