Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427#discussion_r72898521
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategySuite.scala
---
@@ -407,6 +407,39 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427
**[Test build #63053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63053/consoleFull)**
for PR 14427 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
Done, see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427
[SPARK-16818] Exchange reuse incorrectly reuses scans over different sets
of partitions
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425 rebased for branch-2.0
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
@ericl there is a conflict with branch-2.0. Can you create a pull request
for branch-2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Why creating a new pull request? All the discussions were in the other pull
request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63052/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400
**[Test build #63052 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63052/consoleFull)**
for PR 14400 at commit
Github user sylvinus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9860
Might I suggest we have another look at this, to save users from breaking
their cmd-R keys? :-)
This JS snippet (which you can paste in the Chrome console to test) solves
2 of the issues
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63051/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14419
**[Test build #63051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63051/consoleFull)**
for PR 14419 at commit
Github user sakky11 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14402
I know its trivial but it still avoids duplication of code and make it more
readable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400
**[Test build #63052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63052/consoleFull)**
for PR 14400 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400#discussion_r72897142
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CastSuite.scala
---
@@ -727,6 +727,16 @@ class CastSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11209#discussion_r72897064
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/HashBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -119,11 +146,12 @@ object HashBenchmark {
.add("map",
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63050/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user xubo245 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14422
@HyukjinKwon Thank you.
This is my first time to push request to spark, Sorrry, I will follow the
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark later.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14419
**[Test build #63051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63051/consoleFull)**
for PR 14419 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63049/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11209#discussion_r72896977
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/HashBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -119,11 +146,12 @@ object HashBenchmark {
.add("map",
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406
**[Test build #63049 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63049/consoleFull)**
for PR 14406 at commit
Github user deanchen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
Would be great to get this in too. Currently using a hack where we iterate
through all the date columns at the end of our run and manually converting the
values to the string values formatted as
Github user deanchen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118
Would be great to get a resolution to this. We're running into issues in
production attempting to parse csv's with nullable dates. Personally prefer
option b for our use case.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63048/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
**[Test build #63048 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63048/consoleFull)**
for PR 14426 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
**[Test build #63050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63050/consoleFull)**
for PR 14398 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14419#discussion_r72896264
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetCompatibilityTest.scala
---
@@ -119,8 +119,19 @@ private[sql]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406
**[Test build #63049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63049/consoleFull)**
for PR 14406 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
**[Test build #63048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63048/consoleFull)**
for PR 14426 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
This PR grows too much. Sometime, scrolling is lack. I close this and open
a new one https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426 .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
[SPARK-16475][SQL] Broadcast Hint for SQL Queries
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to achieve the following two goals in Spark SQL.
**1. Generic
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63047/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
**[Test build #63047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63047/consoleFull)**
for PR 14425 at commit
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425#discussion_r72895545
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -130,7 +130,9 @@ private[sql] object
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
Yep, both fail prior to the fix.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016, 3:32 PM Reynold Xin wrote:
> LGTM (assuming the test case would fail without the fix)
>
> â
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425#discussion_r72895137
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -130,7 +130,9 @@ private[sql] object
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
LGTM (assuming the test case would fail without the fix)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425#discussion_r72895124
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategySuite.scala
---
@@ -408,6 +408,39 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
**[Test build #63047 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63047/consoleFull)**
for PR 14425 at commit
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425
[SPARK-16818] Exchange reuse incorrectly reuses scans over different sets
of partitions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This fixes a bug wherethe file scan operator does
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14412#discussion_r72894823
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerId.scala
---
@@ -37,10 +37,11 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
class
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14415
DId you add a test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14419#discussion_r72894773
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetCompatibilityTest.scala
---
@@ -119,8 +119,19 @@ private[sql]
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14421
Isn't this just
```
new JavaSparkContext(session.sparkContext)
```
?
Perhaps we should just update the documentation to say that.
---
If your project is set up
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14422
I guess it might be ncer if the contributions you make follow
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark.just
like other contributions.
---
If your project is set
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14419
No, I don't :). I just meant I wanted to say that this fix is reasonable
and the reason I didn't submit a PR has not been because there is potential
incompatability. It was because just I was
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14417
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14402
This patch is only a one-line reduction of code and touches a file which
hasn't needed to be modified in ages; is this change really necessary / worth
spending review time on?
---
If your
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14402
Did you compile this locally before pushing?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14406#discussion_r72892893
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ class SQLConfSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14419
@HyukjinKwon do you have a PR for this? If so I can go ahead and close this
one (and lets maybe sync some on the deprecation stuff we are both cleaning up
:))
---
If your project is set up for
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14419
So yes as @HyukjinKwon says its just in the tests.
I figured this would be ok across the hadoop versions we target because I
looked at the build deps files and they all listed
Github user xubo245 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14424
It add for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14422
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14424
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user xubo245 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14422
I add test : https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14424
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user xubo245 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14424
Add test:DenseMatrix.rand with no rng
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63046/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
**[Test build #63046 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63046/consoleFull)**
for PR 13713 at commit
Github user sakky11 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14402
I think the issue should be fixed now.Sorry for trouble.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14363
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14363
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63045/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14363
**[Test build #63045 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63045/consoleFull)**
for PR 14363 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14422
Doesn't that need a JIRA, test and PR descriptio maybe?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user lins05 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14380
@srowen I have looked about those files, but for complex equations, (e.g.
[this
Github user xubo245 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14422#discussion_r72890434
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,20 @@ object DenseMatrix {
}
/**
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14423
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user xubo245 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14423
Add zeros(size: Int) function
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please
Github user sakky11 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14402
Hey sorry @srowen ,Actually I have fixed the compilation error but missed
it in adding in a pull request.Sorry.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14402
@sakky11 you have not even addressed the compilation error. This is wasting
everyone's time. Please _compile_ this locally and fix it before pinging again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14416
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63044/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14416
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14416
**[Test build #63044 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63044/consoleFull)**
for PR 14416 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14419
Could cc @liancheng who has more insight about thie please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user sakky11 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14402
Added the required fix.Can you please start the build ??
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14422#discussion_r72889871
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,20 @@ object DenseMatrix {
}
/**
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
**[Test build #63046 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63046/consoleFull)**
for PR 13713 at commit
Github user drcrallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
@tnachen this test is a little larger than I originally anticipated. Let me
see if I can add some unit tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user drcrallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
OoooOOO master updated to 1.0.0
Fixed merge conflicts
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zasdfgbnm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14231
Yes this patch looks clearer
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14422
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user xubo245 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14422
we can use it to replacebreeze.linalg.DenseMatrix.rand(numRows: Int,
numCols: Int)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user xubo245 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14422
Add rand(numRows: Int, numCols: Int) functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14363
**[Test build #63045 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63045/consoleFull)**
for PR 14363 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14420
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63043/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14420
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14400#discussion_r72889243
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CastSuite.scala
---
@@ -727,6 +727,16 @@ class CastSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14420
**[Test build #63043 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63043/consoleFull)**
for PR 14420 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14405
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo