On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:52:10PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running Win XP with IE and Zonealarm Pro (active and switched off, no
difference).
Please don't use IE with Freenet. You don't want to compromise your anonymity,
whether you now feel you need it or not.
As for the
for the
entries that have a numeric value?
Salah Coronya wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will someone please post the new .conf file with min/max and defaults?
Apparently the .conf file is not updated when the version is updated.
Toad
Very unlikely to be a Freenet problem. Are you going through a DSL
router or similar device? Sometimes they have really bad limits, and
freenet can break them...
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 03:34:01PM +0200, Manfred Huber wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing the following problem with Freenet:
After
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:31:41AM +0200, Jano wrote:
Latest stable, windows 2000, java 1.4.2:
After a restart and seeing that I have these peers:
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 13 (12/1/200)
OUCH! Have you reseeded recently? In any case if you leave it running
for a day
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:49:46PM +0200, Someone wrote:
Toad schrieb:
OUCH! Have you reseeded recently? In any case if you leave it running
for a day or so it should accumulate more... a reasonable number is 100+
connections...
I found that around 30 connections or normal and 60
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:21:19PM +0200, Someone wrote:
Michael R. Stork schrieb:
It depends on when they do system maintenance. As long as their system
is up, and you stay connected, you should keep renewing the same IP.
No, it is not system maintenance here in germany. In fact it's
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:48:53PM +0200, Someone wrote:
Troed S?ngberg schrieb:
I'm myself on 8/1 ADSL with a static IP, and I just got my VDSL modem
in the mail so in 1-2 weeks I should be up on ~13-20Mbit both ways ...
(depends on the distance to the station).
Cost?
?43/month.
the majority by breaking all their TCP connections every 6-24 hours?
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:12:08PM +0200, Someone wrote:
Toad schrieb:
SIX HOURS? Woah... my address gets changed at most once a month...
The longest time any of the major ISPs for DSL/Dialup allow you to
have an IP is 24 hours
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:03:18PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[putting every image into an iframe to work around Freenet's
reloading bugs]
It works pretty
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:17:30PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
b) the failing file is an image. In that case it just disappears and
you have to reload
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 07:29:05PM -0700, ShoeyFighter wrote:
I'm using the latest freenet client on win98se (don't say anything ;p) and Java
1.42, and I can't get the maximum connections to work properly. I set my max
connections to 75, and my max threads to 200, but when I access my node
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:15:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using the latest freenet client on win98se (don't say anything ;p) and Java
1.42, and I can't get the maximum connections to work properly. I set my max
connections to 75, and my max threads to 200, but when I
access my
Uh, you want us to tell you where you can get WaReZ from on Freenet,
right? That would almost certainly be illegal... and this IS an open
list. Personally I try to avoid proprietary software, but that which I
*DO* use (games) I pay for...
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:14:48PM +0800, currency
Really people, can we take the advocacy to chat or private email? Oh and
btw, the number of nodes on freenet is ~ 4000-16000.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 07:53:38PM -0400, Michael R. Stork wrote:
David Masover wrote:
an excuse to tell them how ignorant they are for not doing it your way
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:55:08AM -0700, miguel wrote:
Hey there! I have a 6+ gigabyte datastore(yeah, yeah, hold the praise.
Thank you, thank you...)
My 3 nodes (usually 1-2 of them are running) have DSs of:
storeSize=0.9G (second unstable node used for testing)
storeSize=19G (stable node)
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:07:02AM -0400, Michael R. Stork wrote:
Toad wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:55:08AM -0700, miguel wrote:
What I can't figure is this...
When I stop Freenet for whatever reason, and then restart it, it looks
to me like it should load some of my previously
Strange... what Java version are you running it under?
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:09:54PM +0200, Hessi James wrote:
hi,
i run an up-to-date windows version of freenet. the webinterface however
is not reachable, the site does not finish loading.
in freenet.log i get many errors like this
Is the store full? If not, this is probably a bug...
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:33:53PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
I've just started running a freenet node again, it's been up for a few
hours (and is getting bombarded by incoming connections :P). However,
I'm trying to download FUQID
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:17:30PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a) one does not use Fproxy for fetching a file
In which case whatever you did use would retry.
Not necessarily. Scripts talking FCP via netcat most likely won't...
And, I think
You appear to have set outputBandwidthLimit=250. That is not a good
idea!
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 11:15:26AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having lot of trouble getting anywhere after installation. Can anyone tell me
what the problem is from looking at this info?
Node Version 0.5
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:45:46AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Madeline Brubaker wrote:
| Would someone step me through setting up Norton Internet Security
| Professional properly? I'm not entirely sure how to
Do yourself a favor, and
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 12:15:09AM -0400, Michael R. Stork wrote:
David Masover wrote:
Michael R. Stork wrote:
[...]
| a hardware firewall and NAT. I wouldn't connect any PC direct to a
| cable/DSL line.
I would. A linux one. Or better, a BSD one. With daily updates. The
firewall
Because the solution he offered was actually reasonably practical. For a
lot of people anyway. Maybe not trivial but certainly not hard, and
probably not expensive. However we are straying dangerously close to
advocacy here...
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 12:25:15AM -0400, Michael R. Stork wrote:
:)
Good point. Personally I've never used Norton even on a Windows
machine.. maybe somebody here has.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 02:08:00AM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Now that we have let off the steam, did anyone ever really try to answer this nice
person's questions to her satisfaction?
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:46:24PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
| I had an external firewall only that sat between the cable modem and the
| house LAN, but there was a problem; someone else on the LAN got a worm
| (they aren't as savvy) and I was running Windows without a firewall, and
| with
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:01:24PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Find the IP address of my NAT or Firewall.
The FAQ says to consult my manual but I can't find this information.
check http://www.whatismyip.com/
it displays your ip from their POV which is the IP the freenet nodes have
I would respond to this, but this is DEFINITELY getting off-topic.
Please take distribution/OS advocacy to chat.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 06:04:59PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicholas Sturm wrote:
| Dear
|
|Madeline Brubaker:
|
|
|
If you are just using NIS and connecting directly to the DSL modem/cable
modem, then you just need to tell NIS to allow incoming connections on
the listenPort... you probably don't need to set ipAddress. And if you
do, on a dynamic DNS system, it probably would be a bad idea anyway.
On Sun, Jun
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:29:53PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
Saw this on /. - thought it might interest someone. Especially the part
about using the server JVM instead of client JVM when speed is an issue
(i.e, if you have plenty of ram but you feel Freenet use too much CPU)
My
, miguel wrote:
Could Toad or Ian or someone out there supply us with some config file settings that
will make Freenet run optimally(on most machines) without us having to do
experiment after time-consuming experiment until we eventually(or not) discover
which settings are best. And please
What build of Freenet? How much memory in the machine? Did you try to
reduce the memory limit? Are you running on Windows? If you are running
on *nix, please send your start-freenet.sh .. if you are running on
Windows, there's an equivalent issue with direct memory settings but I
don't know what
I can get it easily enough. Would you like me to email you
seednodes.ref? I could bzip2 it, if you have bzip2 to decompress it, to
save space (it'll still be ~ 2MB...).
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:59:10AM +0200, Mathieu Benoit wrote:
Dear all,
I'm not able to connect to any freenet servers to
How is your node now?
What did you set the ipAddress to? It needs to be the external IP
address of your router... if it's on a dynamic IP, the best way to do
this is with dyndns...
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:24:28PM +, runya sairon wrote:
i run my T1 ( win xp ) behind a DI-604
I can add a special case to make this work. But I need the output of
the uname command on OS/X.
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:12:49AM +, Paul wrote:
Hi. I have successfully run freenet on Mac OS X for some time.
I have downloaded installed the latest
stable, but when I attempt to start
Does this still happen? I think it was caused by tempfile leaks which
hopefully are fixed now...
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:54:28AM -0400, Daves Lists wrote:
My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the thread
limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:33:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for my late reply I was out of town most of last week.
The newest build seems to have fix the problem with it almost always being
overloaded, but it still is getting overloaded by this by a lot. It will get
My reply is on tech. That is the more appropriate forum. Or perhaps even
chat.
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
First they came for the child porn sites ...
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1232422,00.html
Discussion on
How long has the node been up?
Go to advanced mode on the web interface. What is the error message now?
It will be more detailed.
How many incoming connections do you have?
Show me the top few lines of the following page:
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html
As the warning on
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:41:57AM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I have just tried to insert a file into the network, running stable
build 5084. After the successful insertion, I used the URI:
freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to request the file just inserted on the main web interface
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 06:06:46AM -0500, Robert Greenage wrote:
is there a problem if my nodes data store reaches 100% ?
No.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
There are some minor technical issues happening:
Sourceforge appears to be down: CVS is not working, at least not from my
PC. Cannot connect to host. Interestingly, the web site is still up.
The seednodes.ref (stable seednodes) file consists of one node:
physical.tcp=82.32.16.59:49561
...
End
/etc/security/limits ?
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 12:15:28AM +, tripolar wrote:
I have read Ed's tips below though I am still at a loss as how to add
ulimit stuff to /etc/profile and /etc/initscript
here is the path to java
/usr/lib/j2re1.4-sun/bin/java
and the path for freenet is
All nodes, whether transient or not, now accept queries and process
them for other nodes. It is unclear whether transient actually means
anything, we will probably remove it soon.
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 07:33:16AM +, Cossack wrote:
Would it be advantageous to make freenet default to a
Freenet stable build 5084 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP, if you
are running a stable branch node (if you're not, you'll know). You can
do this by running the update.sh script on POSIX like systems such as
Linux or MacOS/X (stop the node first, then update it, then start it),
or on
If you downloaded 5083 or 5084 recently, for a POSIX-like platform such
as Linux or MacOS/X, if you downloaded the tgz, rather than upgrading
an existing node, or if you built from CVS, you may have got an
incorrect update.sh. It accidentally slipped in in 5083 and has now been
corrected. It would
Hmmm. What are you running this on? If unix, what's your ulimit -n ?
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:10:58PM +, tripolar wrote:
java.io.IOException: Too many open files
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method)
at
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:46:10PM +, tripolar wrote:
I am running Debian-sid
I am currently trying to find my ulimit -n ??
Any clues?
Thanks
Just type it at a command line.
Toad wrote:
Hmmm. What are you running this on? If unix, what's your ulimit -n ?
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004
Hi. Some users have been reporting NullPointerException's on startup of
their stable nodes. I have a possible fix, but I'd like to test this
before merging it to stable. If you have this problem please mail me and
I'll send you a jar to test. Include which branch you are running.
--
Matthew J
Woah. Oh well, what do you expect from the Church of Scientology?
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Having found that I was using Mozilla 1.6 for most browsing, I allowed it to become
the default browser with EarthLink TotalAccess. Before that I'd had
Internet
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 07:52:20PM +0100, Toad wrote:
Woah. Oh well, what do you expect from the Church of Scientology?
I heard they own Earthlink, that all. If they don't, I apologize for
spreading malicious rumours.
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 12:55:14PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Having
Woah. We have MUCH less bandwidth in the UK. :|
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 10:13:04AM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:39:14 -0400, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's either not that speed, or not DSL!
ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little
Freenet stable build 5083 is now available. All stable branch users
should upgrade. This build will be made mandatory in the fairly near
future, so it is a good idea to upgrade soon. If you don't know which
branch you're on you're probably running stable. If on linux, MacOS/X,
or other POSIX
A 1.4 JVM is an absolute requirement, because we use NIO. Sorry. Kaffe
or GCJ might run on NetBSD, however, right now the NIO doesn't work on
that either (bugs, being worked on, but can't give you a schedule).
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:23:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I recently
Does it start anyway?
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:12:49AM +, Paul wrote:
Hi. I have successfully run freenet on Mac OS X for some time.
I have downloaded installed the latest
stable, but when I attempt to start freenet, here is the result:
iMac:~/freenet paul$ sh ./start-freenet.sh
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:13:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds
successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes
to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:15:25AM +0200, Garb wrote:
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
I find Java's memory requirements to be totally
unreasonable, its performance lackluster, and I've
finally come to the conclusion that it was indeed a
poor choice of language in which to implement a project
of
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:49:30PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
But if I understand, Freenet can't work on a network without fixed IP
or dns server ?
Freenet can't work with an internal IP and port redirection from the
external IP so no way to go throw a firewall ?
Lot of constraint for
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 05:53:51AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have re download the seednode after thinking freenet was frozen for 5 minutes
because no progress bar working (another bug).
What exactly happened? You tried to access a freenet site and it took
more than 5 minutes to fetch
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:27:07PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said above, it is technically possible to run it behind a firewall
ok so I have put an automatic update of dns name in my internal Dns server which
point to my external IP (externalIP.server.network) and put it in the
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 01:37:24PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Below
Or use a service such as dyndns.org and put your hostname in your
freenet.ini. Freenet has routines to check for IP changes (I've
disabled them - static IP), so it should work pretty well once it's
established, but
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:34:18AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:04:53AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Not terribly well, because of high level bandwidth limiting. The node
needs to know how much bandwidth is available
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:08:25PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
version 0.5.2.8 on win2k server and I install it by just clicking on freenet-
webinstall.exe .
I am on a Nat so I have modify freenet.ini file with ipAddress=192.168.0.1 and
a redirector to this ip with the random freenet
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:39:34PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2004 10:51:20 -0400, Jay Oliveri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Fred takes too much CPU and RAM because it's written in Java.
I hate this depate.
It's true that object orienting uses up (a few) more bytes than
Go to Advanced mode on the Web Interface. Then tell us exactly what the
error message says when you try to get the page(s).
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:26:07AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to get http://127.0.0.1:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] but always same error Couldn't
retrieve key and
at it then, see if I can find where
to do the limiting. I knew Java knowledge would come in handy :P
So for now my node is offline. I've lowered my rate limiting to 500
bytes/sec to keep things under control, but I'm waiting for my ISPs
traffic information to come back online...
Toad
much traffic it wants, and this will oscillate
wildly
according to how many domestic versus international nodes are
connecting. I'm
*hoping* domestic nodes will learn that it is worthwhile connecting to
me, but
they may be put off by the average they get. I don't know. Someday
when Toad
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:32:50AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One thing that I can think of is limiting the size of incoming files
not requested by the node directly - stop splitfiles and things going
through. I'm more interested in the
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:42:28PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
Toad wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:05:42AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
So I've been working towards a Linux traffic shaper that gives sets no
limits on traffic with domestic IP addresses and limits international
traffic
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 01:39:37AM +0200, Martin Scheffler wrote:
On Friday 21 May 2004 22:27, Toad wrote:
STUN is used to determine whether you are behind NAT. If you are then you
need a third party to start connections to others behind NAT. The third
party need not be a single server
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:27:41PM +, c enrique wrote:
hello i just need some help with this issue. When I try to run freenet.sh
this is the error message i'm getting :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] freenet]$ sh start-freenet.sh
Detected freenet-ext.jar
Detected freenet.jar
Starting Freenet now:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 03:44:20PM +0200, Ole Tange wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2004 20:32:08 +0100, Toad wrote:
and most of the rest are
behind NATs which the user doesn't properly work around. :)
Is there any reason why we cannot use STUN to avoid the NAT problems? It
ought to be fairly
Umm. I was told that most NATs would use the port number to forward
packets from any and all external hosts to the one internal PC that has
used a given port.. is that wrong?
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 06:48:42PM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On
In any case, is it fair to say that we will probably need some sort of
introduction over the network for anything like this to work? i.e. we
will need a way to send a message to a node we are not directly
connected to, through the network?
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 07:36:16PM +0100, Toad wrote
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 07:37:25PM +0100, Toad wrote:
In any case, is it fair to say that we will probably need some sort of
introduction over the network for anything like this to work? i.e. we
will need a way to send a message to a node we are not directly
connected to, through the network
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 09:36:57PM +0200, Ole Tange wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:02:39 +0100, dave-kId6I2PxnVtBDgjK7y7TUQ wrote:
and most of the rest are
behind NATs which the user doesn't properly work around. :)
Is there any reason why we cannot use STUN to avoid the NAT problems? It
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:21:31AM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Toad wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
=20
And to further the mail objection against having to use my ISP's mailer
to talk to *this* list
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 04:13:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems so, as if the snapshots do not get updated anymore. At least the
unstable-latest.jar (or similiar, the file which gets downloaded from the update
script) is still version 60103, although 60105 was already announced.
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 08:08:22PM -0700, pineapple wrote:
The paypay-freenet incident has landed on slashdot.
Wonder how the website will hold up? :)
The website isn't a problem, it's hosted on sourceforge.
The problem with slashdot is usually that the network gets 10,000 new
hosts, of which
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:54:28AM -0400, Daves Lists wrote:
My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the thread
limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My datastore is set to 50
gigs and is no where near full. Below are the stats before and after. Were
those
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:13:48AM +0200, TLD wrote:
Daves Lists wrote:
My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the
thread limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My datastore is
set to 50 gigs and is no where near full. Below are the stats before and
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:14:36AM -0500, tripolar wrote:
I am running Debian-sid, 2.6.3 kernel, and java from sun ( j2re-1_4_2_04
). I installed freenet, edited the conf file- just added my ip address.
When I started freenet $sh start-freenet.sh I get this error ( below)
though this part
This shouldn't happen any more - at least, not from SORBS.
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:29:19AM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 18 09:25:34 2004
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 09:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem MAILER-DAEMON
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arguably we should change the index format to not include actual
pathnames.
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:07:48AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote:
Or adding code to handle the situation better even...
/N
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:33:50AM -0400, Ed Soniat wrote:
I have a freenet configuration which was working great and then it started crashing.
Since it was working fine and I haven't changed anything I doubt it is the
configuration file.
Some times it runs for several minutes, some times
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:30:59PM -0700, Chris Linstruth wrote:
Reversing this should do the trick. SORBS.NET is way too aggressive and
often out-of-date with marginal support in gettting erroneous entries removed.
Spamhaus hasn't given me any problems at all. Nor has the mail-abuse.org
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Someone wrote:
Edward J. Huff schrieb:
Nothing goes through my ISP's mail server,
but since traffic on port 25 is unencrypted, they can read my
mail anyway.
As an alternative you could post to and read the lists via the gmane
news group server,
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:27:41AM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 09:40, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote:
Also, linux's FAT32 driver doesn't care for case... However, if the
Freenet client get a directory listing and do
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:04:06PM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 15:55, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote:
As I said, FAT32 filesystems under Linux are
*case-insensitive*...Whenever you type the name in UPPER or lower
case,
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:16:58PM -0400, Jay Oliveri wrote:
Don't wait for someone to implement what you've suggested (allowing direct
SMTP connections from a dynamic IP); there's enough work to do without
building these kinds of things that just lead to constant maintenance.
There's
The account has apparently been frozen. Feel free to slashdot. (I was
rather tempted to CC this to announce, but I don't think it would have
been a good idea :) ). We should be able to get the money back
(fortunately there wasn't much in the account).. but it may take 6
months... Apparently the
Sure. On Windows:
Mozilla, Opera (with some configuration, specifically you must set
it not to ignore MIME types), Firebird/Firefox, Lynx, Links.
On Linux/BSD/etc:
Mozilla, Firebird/Firefox, Konqueror (probably; not thoroughly tested),
Links, Lynx.
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:41:50AM -0700, mary
We need seednode sources for stable urgently.
All you need to do is give dodo.freenetproject.org access to mainport:
mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,212.13.198.248
in your freenet.conf
And send me the address of the node.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official
Freenet stable build 5082 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Please upgrade ASAP. Stable branch users should upgrade at
least weekly as Freenet is still at a relatively early phase of
development. You can use the update option on the start menu, or
freenet-webinstall.exe to update
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:37:44PM -0500, tripolar wrote:
I restarted freenet- works now!
Lesson I learned today-Dont delete temp files :-)
Or don't install software into the temp directory :)
tripolar wrote:
I deleted windows temp files- call me paranoid stupid ;-) because I
was
Okay.
Show me the header (the lines at the top, before the table) from
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html
If it says 0 node references, stop freenet, remove it, reinstall it with
new seednodes, and if it still doesn't work, send me your freenet.log
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:57:25PM -0400, Peter E. Urban Jr. wrote:
Clear Dayjust found your software, but can not do anythingi.e. couldn't retrieve
key any of them did not work
help
thanks
Pete
Firstly, please don't use HTML mail, if you can avoid it, when talking
to us.
Secondly,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:07:47PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Most Win users are not at all accustomed to finding and editing .ini files
because those went out of general use about three Win-generations ago
when Microsoft decided that those darn users just don't know how to
use our software
Freenet stable build 5081 is now available. Please upgrade, unless you
are running an unstable build. Users of the stable network should
upgrade weekly on average. The snapshots are updating. You can get the
new build by using freenet-webinstall.exe on Windows, or update.sh on
Linux/*nix/MacOS X.
Fixed in 5080. Upgrade!
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 08:34:05PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
On 11-May-2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows XP Pro
After having Freenet disabled for a couple of weeks while I was doing some
heavy downloading I decided to fire it up again. I figured it
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now I believe I can live with freenet being slow and that
many documents are not immediately available. What is
annoying me is that _I_ will have to do the retrying. Why is
that
401 - 500 of 706 matches
Mail list logo