Re: [systemd-devel] Predictable Network Interface Name Bug?

2021-12-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:37:41PM -0500, Tim Safe wrote: > Hello- > > I have an Ubuntu Server 20.04 (systemd 245 (245.4-4ubuntu3.13)) box that I > recently installed a Intel quad-port Gigabit ethernet adapter (E1G44ETBLK). > > It appears that the predictable interface naming is only renaming the

Re: [systemd-devel] Predictable Network Interface Name Bug?

2021-12-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 07:27:44AM -0500, Tim Safe wrote: > Thanks for the reply! Here's the output: > > $ udevadm test-builtin net_id /sys/class/net/ens8f0 > ID_NET_NAME_SLOT=ens8f0 > > $ udevadm test-builtin net_id /sys/class/net/ens8f1 > ID_NET_NAME_SLOT=ens8f1 > > $ udevadm test-builtin net_

Re: [systemd-devel] Predictable Network Interface Name Bug?

2021-12-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
As Lennart wrote, some of the changes since v245 are likely to fix your issue. I'd put my money on https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/2c8ec0095e i.e. systemd 247, but it's probably best to try systemd 249. Zbyszek

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] [systemd‑devel] Why is using fstab the preferred approach according to systemd.mount man page?

2022-01-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:15:22PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> "Manuel Wagesreither" schrieb am 10.01.2022 um 11:43 > >>> in > Nachricht <759bd805-ab37-4dc9-93cd-137668acf...@www.fastmail.com>: > > Hi all, > > > > currently, the systemd.mount man page [1] claims that "In general, > > confi

[systemd-devel] version bump of minimal kernel version supported by systemd?

2022-03-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi all, we are considering dropping upstream support for kernel versions < 4.4. Would this be a problem for anyone? (*). Zbyszek (*) If you answer "yes", please substantiate why you are running new systemd with such old kernels.

Re: [systemd-devel] version bump of minimal kernel version supported by systemd?

2022-03-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 08:07:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:27:07PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > we are considering dropping upstream support for kernel versions < 4.4. > > Would this be a problem for anyone?

Re: [systemd-devel] version bump of minimal kernel version supported by systemd?

2022-03-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:26:05AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:17:36AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 08:07:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:27:07PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >

Re: [systemd-devel] version bump of minimal kernel version supported by systemd?

2022-03-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 03:58:22PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 12:38 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:28:29AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 11:59 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: version bump of minimal kernel version supported by systemd?

2022-03-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 08:21:37AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote: > I wonder: > > Why not providing some test suite instead: If the test suite succeeds, systemd > might work; if it doesn't, manual steps are needed. > My guess is that most people will quit trying once manual steps are needed. > In addi

Re: [systemd-devel] version bump of minimal kernel version supported by systemd?

2022-03-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 08:08:31AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:11:36PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > CIP 4.4 is supposed to be maintained until 2027, which is awfully > > long. The question is: is anyone putting new systemd on thos

Re: [systemd-devel] version bump of minimal kernel version supported by systemd?

2022-03-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:28:39AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 09:38 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mi, 23.03.22 11:28, Luca Boccassi (bl...@debian.org) wrote: > > > > > At least according to our documentation it wouldn't save us much > > > anyway, as the biggest le

Re: [systemd-devel] all numeric usernames not allowed in systemd (version 245 onward)

2022-04-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 04:37:48PM +0530, Nikhil Kshirsagar wrote: > Is there any chance systemd could support a configuration option in the > future to get the earlier "all numeric" user logins to work? With an > understanding that it would be at the users own risk? No. > Are there any pam_system

Re: [systemd-devel] Splitting sd-boot from systemd/bootctl for enabling sd-boot in Fedora

2022-04-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:12:02PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > Hey all, Hi Neal, thank you for starting the discussion. I think it'd be good to figure out what are the high-level options we have as a community… > Some of you might know about the recent discussion in Fedora about > dropping BIOS s

Re: [systemd-devel] Splitting sd-boot from systemd/bootctl for enabling sd-boot in Fedora

2022-04-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:55:55AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 6:47 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:12:02PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > Hi Neal, > > > > tha

Re: [systemd-devel] Splitting sd-boot from systemd/bootctl for enabling sd-boot in Fedora

2022-04-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:31:10AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 7:41 AM Lennart Poettering > wrote: > It is not very friendly when you're in a failure scenario or have to > deal with boot stuff. Well, if you have a boot failure, then a text-based interface is better than a g

Re: [systemd-devel] Splitting sd-boot from systemd/bootctl for enabling sd-boot in Fedora

2022-04-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:26:14AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:31:10AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 7:41 AM Lennart Poettering > &g

Re: [systemd-devel] Splitting sd-boot from systemd/bootctl for enabling sd-boot in Fedora

2022-04-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:48:04AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:46 AM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 11:26 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > &

Re: [systemd-devel] Splitting sd-boot from systemd/bootctl for enabling sd-boot in Fedora

2022-04-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:40:36AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:26 AM Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > Note that it means Fedora CI, pull requests from contributors, and > > > releng auto-rebuilds will no longer wo

Re: [systemd-devel] Should `MACAddressPolicy=persistent` for bridges/bonds/all-software-devices be reconsidered?

2022-05-09 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 03:57:21PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 09.05.22 11:23, Thomas Haller (thal...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > this email is for discussing MACAddressPolicy=persistent in > > /data/src/systemd/network/99-default.link > > I think this would be be

Re: [systemd-devel] issues with systemd-cryptsetup@.service after in 251-rc3

2022-05-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 01:42:43PM +0200, Daan De Meyer wrote: > > Am 19.05.22 um 05:32 schrieb Dusty Mabe: > > > I'm requesting help to try to find a problematic commit between > > > v251-rc2..v251-rc3. > > > > > > We have a test in Fedora CoreOS [1] that tests luks and this test > > > started fai

Re: [systemd-devel] issues with systemd-cryptsetup@.service after in 251-rc3

2022-05-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 03:51:58PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 01:42:43PM +0200, Daan De Meyer wrote: > > > Am 19.05.22 um 05:32 schrieb Dusty Mabe: > > > > I'm requesting help to try to find a problematic commit betwe

Re: [systemd-devel] Configuring systemd to build systemd-tempfiles in Yocto

2022-05-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 01:24:44PM +, Dave Glenton wrote: > Sorry if this question is covered elsewhere, but a couple of days of googling > and experimentation has failed to find a solution and hopefully someone in > this list can give me some pointers. > > I am trying to configure an Open E

Re: [systemd-devel] Fwd: make pystemd part of systemd repo.

2022-08-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
[I misplaced the original mail, so I'm replying to a forward. Apologies if threading is broken.] > What do we propose to do? > - > > We want to bring pystemd[1] into the systemd organization, and merge > (functionality wise) with python-systemd[2], so that there is a single > Python library,

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-timer way of queuing jobs like 'at' command does ?

2022-12-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 08:00:06PM +1100, Michael Chapman wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:17 AM Nicolas Pillot > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > I am wondering if i can dynamically plan jobs (once) using systemd timer. > > > What i mean

Re: [systemd-devel] Unsubscribing doesn't work.

2023-03-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 01:50:02PM -0400, Znoteer wrote: > Hi, > > I've tried twice sending an email to systemd-devel-request@l.f.o with > unsubscribe in the subject and then in the body. Thoese mails were both > rejected. > > I tried also subscribing via the maillist web site form. That also

Re: [systemd-devel] Root remaining read-only after boot, no obvious reason why

2023-05-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:21:27PM +, Dave Re wrote: > > Hi, all, > > Hoping to get some assistance root causing this issue. We have a set of > CentOS 7 based systems in AWS that we're using the leapp tool to migrate to > AlmaLinux 8.7. Following migration, the root filesystem is ending up

Re: [systemd-devel] Root remaining read-only after boot, no obvious reason why

2023-05-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 02:37:58PM +, Dave Re wrote: > > Hi, Zbyszek, > > The kernel default is to mount root ro, so unless there's some configuration > to > mount or remount it rw, it'll stay ro. Generally this is configured in two > places 'rw' on the kernel command line and 'rw' in /etc/f

Re: [systemd-devel] Root remaining read-only after boot, no obvious reason why

2023-05-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:26:00PM +, Dave Re wrote: > One step I haven't taken is turning on debug level logging in systemd - not > sure what to expect (or not expect) out of it, but I guess that's my next > step. I'd welcome any pointers to debugging resources, etc, but realize this > is a

[systemd-devel] deprecating Forward-Secure Sealing (FSS) in the journal

2023-07-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi, I'd like to start $subject. First, we'd just add an entry in NEWS and make the key generation code print a warning, but then in a release or few remove the code. See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/28433/commits/1ecd1a994733d. If you're using FSS, please speak up. Zbyszek

Re: [systemd-devel] Networkd's IPv6 Compliance Issues

2023-07-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 03:23:14AM +, Muggeridge, Matt wrote: > Hi, > > Recently, we ran a test suite to check networkd's conformance to IPv6 > Protocol (see https://www.ipv6ready.org/resources.html). I found a large > number of test failures (more than 80) and after examining a small numbe

Re: [systemd-devel] Is systemd-cryptsetup binary internal?

2023-09-19 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:17:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 18.09.23 15:22, mpan (systemdml-bfok4...@mpan.pl) wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I got redirected to here from #systemd on Libera. While responding to a > > query from another person (not on #systemd), I came across an amb

Re: [systemd-devel] libraries can not found since 252

2023-11-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 02:33:55PM +0800, d tbsky wrote: > Hi: >I saw systemd 252 release notes: > > Private shared libraries (libsystemd-shared-nnn.so, > libsystemd-core-nnn.so) are now installed into arch-specific > directories to allow multi-arch installs. > > I don't know if that is rel

Re: [systemd-devel] Bugfix release(s)

2019-01-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 01:09:16PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 14.01.19 11:26, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote: > > > > > > Well, that sounds as if you want to volunteer as release engineer? ;-) > > > > > > Thing is, we are understaffed. I too have a wishlist of things I'd >

[systemd-devel] planned v241 release

2019-01-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi everyone, 241 will be released soon. Current list of outstanding tickets [1]: "23 wireguard peers hang systemd-networkd" #11404 opened 3 days ago by darkk network: wait for kernel to reply ipv6 peer address #11428 (needs review) "Bump numbers for v241" #11387 (release mechanics) "Add 'udevad

Re: [systemd-devel] WantedBy=default.target

2019-03-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:31:18AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am Do., 7. März 2019 um 11:24 Uhr schrieb Lennart Poettering > : > > > > On Do, 07.03.19 10:30, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > Looks like quite a few services use > > > WantedBy=default.target > > > https://codesear

Re: [systemd-devel] can I use network-online.target without NM and networkd

2019-03-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:18:06PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 25.03.19 um 22:00 schrieb Belisko Marek: > > in my app I need to delay startup until network is really up & running. > > I go through [1] and it mentions that it works only with NetworkManager > > and systemd-networkd. I'm us

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 242-rc1

2019-04-03 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 07:55:42AM +, systemd tag bot wrote: > A new systemd ☠️ pre-release ☠️ has just been tagged. Please download the > tarball here: Please ignore this one. The version number was not bumped properly. v242-rc2 has already been tagged. Zbyszek _

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-coredump[2529]: Process 2326 (xfwm4) of user 1000 dumped core maybe because of lightdm[2482]: gkr-pam: unable to locate daemon control file

2019-04-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 09:22:30PM +0200, linuxfr...@gmx.at wrote: > Hi, > > i do not know who is the correct person / mailing list, to ask for this one. > > 1) screen-lock locks the screen  (OK) > > 2) screensaver comes and screen is going to be black.  (OK) > > 3) Everytime i unlock my locked

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-coredump[2529]: Process 2326 (xfwm4) of user 1000 dumped core maybe because of lightdm[2482]: gkr-pam: unable to locate daemon control file

2019-04-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 09:32:57PM +0200, linuxfr...@gmx.at wrote: > Hi Zbyszek, > > > i've already did this. > > It started after desktop freezes here: > > https://forum.manjaro.org/t/xfce-desktop-freezes-after-automated-screen-lock-manjaro-18-0-4-illyria/84717/12 > > which were solved, but t

Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl list all possible (including unloaded) services

2019-05-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 09:27:17AM -0600, Roger Pack wrote: > Hello, I'm trying to answer this question: > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/517872/systemctl-list-all-possible-including-disabled-services > > Basically, I have a my_service.service that is disabled, I wish I > could "see t

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Re: "bad" status for genersated target; why?

2019-05-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:04:28PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 16.05.2019 um 10:29 > in > Nachricht <20190516082910.GA24042@gardel-login>: > > On Do, 16.05.19 08:55, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni‑regensburg.de) > wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> After having re

Re: [systemd-devel] Does "systemctl daemon-reload" discard service information?

2019-05-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 03:36:28PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > I have had the effect that a "systectl status" before and after a > "daemon-reload" is different, while the service in question wasn't restarted: Whenever making a report like this, always include the exact systemd version yo

Re: [systemd-devel] Node.js sd-notify module visibility

2019-05-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote: > Hi, > > I actively maintain a Node.js module "sd-notify" available on GitHub > (https://github.com/roryrjb/sd-notify) and npm > (https://www.npmjs.com/package/sd-notify) that has been contributed to > and is being used by others. As

Re: [systemd-devel] Node.js sd-notify module visibility

2019-05-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
n 23/05/2019 10:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I actively maintain a Node.js module "sd-notify" available on GitHub > >> (https://github.com/roryrjb/sd-

Re: [systemd-devel] Node.js sd-notify module visibility

2019-05-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
; On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:05 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I actively maintain a Node.js m

Re: [systemd-devel] Node.js sd-notify module visibility

2019-05-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:43:27PM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote: > Yup, go for it. Done. Zbyszek > On 23/05/2019 12:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:27:56PM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote: > >> Yeah of course, didn't even think. I'

Re: [systemd-devel] How to get hardware watchdog status when using systemd

2019-05-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:59:27PM +0200, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote: > Hello, > > I've enabled "RuntimeWatchdogSec=30" in /etc/systemd/system.conf > (after reading excellent "systemd for Administrators" series [0]). > > Before enabling that "wdctl" printed nice statistics but now it only > inform

Re: [systemd-devel] How to get hardware watchdog status when using systemd

2019-05-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 01:50:53PM +0200, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote: > Hi Zbyszek, > > On 28.05.2019 13:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >What kind of information are you after? > > One interesting statistic I'd like to see changing is the time when > t

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and chroot()

2019-06-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:42:35PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > We are adding some new functionality to the NFS server that > will make it a bit more container friendly... > > This new functionality needs to do a chroot(2) system call. > This systemcall is failing with EPERM due to

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd spends much time about 30 seconds for every unit

2019-06-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 03:48:58AM +, 程 书意 wrote: > Hi all, > > I am working on virtualization on armv8 platform and encountered a complex > problem. From the below boot log, we can find: > > 1. Every unit init need about 30 seconds. > 2. status_printf function doesn't work. [no status

Re: [systemd-devel] Building systemd

2019-06-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 05:58:16PM -0300, Leonardo Akel Daher wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to make a Pull Request for systemd, but I am struggling running > the tests locally (before making any code changes). I get the error of the > attached image when running "ninja -C build/ test". Hi, please

Re: [systemd-devel] swap on zram service unit, using Conflicts=umount

2019-06-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 02:11:03PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sa, 22.06.19 10:42, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've got a commit to add 'Conflicts=umount.target' to this zram > > service based on a bug comment I cited in the comment. But I'm not > > ce

Re: [systemd-devel] swap on zram service unit, using Conflicts=umount

2019-06-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:55:27AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 24.06.19 13:16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > > So for tmpfs mounts that don't turn off DefaultDependencies= we > > > implicit add in an After=swap.target o

Re: [systemd-devel] connection failure

2019-07-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 03:39:04PM +0200, ABDUL MAJITH wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to use the Docker in GNS3, when I try to launch it show the > error as follows, > > -- The start-up result is done. > Jul 02 15:21:55 reccon.irisa.fr systemd[1]: docker.service: Start request > repeated too qu

Re: [systemd-devel] Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?

2019-07-09 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 08:49:32AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > It seems "--state=failed" is being ignored silently for "systemctl status" > (in version 228). Is this by design? Nope. In 242-1092+ it seems to work fine. Zbyszek ___ systemd-dev

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?

2019-07-09 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:23:47AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek schrieb am 09.07.2019 um > 10:05 > in Nachricht <20190709080527.gk17...@in.waw.pl>: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 08:49:32AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> It seems "‑‑state=failed" is bei

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-07-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:57:44AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > At $JOB, on some of our SLES12 boxes, our logs are getting swamped > with messages saying: > > "Too many concurrent connections, refusing" Please always specify the systemd version in use. We're not all SLES users, and even if we

Re: [systemd-devel] OFFLIST Re: systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-07-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 11:05:50PM +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:28 PM Brian Reichert wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 11:21:13AM +0100, > > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org wrote: > > > Hi Brian > > > > > > I feel embarrassed at having recommended you to join t

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-07-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:51:36AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 07:37:19AM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > It's a bug report as any other. Writing a meaningful reply takes time > > and effort. Lack of time is a much better explanation than ressentiments.

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-07-11 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:08:43AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:44:14PM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > That's ancient... 228 was released almost four years ago. > > That's the joy of using a commercial Linux distribution; they tend > to be conservative

Re: [systemd-devel] "Unknown lvalue '' in section 'Service'"

2019-07-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:46:59AM +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:34 AM Ulrich Windl < > ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I noticed that a line of "===" in "[Service]" cases the message " > > Unknown lvalue '' in section 'Service'". > > (

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-07-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:48:40PM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to backup the journal logs for the current boot in a > "raw" format so I can reuse it later with "journalctl > --file=my-backup". > > But looking at the different values for "-o" option I can't find the answer.

Re: [systemd-devel] KExecWatchdogSec NEWS entry needs work

2019-07-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:32:44AM +1000, Clinton Roy wrote: > Particularly the following sentence: > > This option defaults to off, since it depends on drivers and > software setup whether the watchdog is correctly reset again after > the kexec completed, and thus for the general case not clear i

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-08-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > you can export and write to a journal file with: > > journalctl -o export ... | /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journal-remote -o > > /tm

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-08-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:37:31AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:36:41AM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 14:56 -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > > > I see, between 13:49:30 and 13:50:01, I see 25 'successful' calls > > > for close(), e.g.: > > > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-08-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:26:50AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szme

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-08-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:52:07AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:36 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:26:50AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:45 AM Zbigniew Jędr

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-08-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 08:46:58AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 08:17:01AM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > The kernel will use the lower-numbered available fd, so there's lot of > > "reuse" of the same numbers happening. This strace means that between > > ea

Re: [systemd-devel] lto issues

2019-08-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi, > > today I tried compiling systemd v242 (on Debian sid) once using lto > (-Db_lto=true) and once without lto (-Db_lto=false). > > The lto build took approximately twice as long on my laptop (using > dpkg-buildpackage, which int

Re: [systemd-devel] lto issues

2019-08-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:34:36AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am Di., 6. Aug. 2019 um 09:26 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > : > > > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > today I tried comp

Re: [systemd-devel] nspawn blocks sync_file_range on arm

2019-08-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:02:35PM +0100, Steve Dodd wrote: > ARM has two sync_file_range syscalls, sync_file_range and sync_file_range2. > The former is apparently not used, and glibc calls the latter whenever a > userspace program calls sync_file_range. I'm guessing systemd-nspawn > doesn't know

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-boot on Fedora 30?

2019-08-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:43:43AM -0700, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to get sd-boot to work on Fedora 30, made some progress > but not fully there yet... > > First I found my partition GPT type in /boot was incorrect and bootctl was > trying to use /boot/efi instead. O

Re: [systemd-devel] logind: 242~rc2 break VT/tty switching on Fedora 31

2019-08-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 04:08:39PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > I already filed a github issue for $subject: > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/13437 > > But I'm not sure how close github issues are watched hence this email. It > would be nice if we can get this fixed for F3

Re: [systemd-devel] When will my timer next run?

2019-08-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 06:04:22PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I've created my service timer with the following: > > [Timer] > # wait a bit after boot to let our victim catch up with its work > OnBoot=13m This needs to be OnBootSec=13m. (systemd-analyze verify is your friend in cases like this

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd243rc2, sysd-coredump is not triggered on segfaults

2019-09-03 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 07:55:20PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Maybe it's something unique to gnome-shell segfaults, that's the only > thing I have crashing right now. But I've got a pretty good reproducer > to get it to crash and I never have any listings with coredumpctl. > > process segfaults

Re: [systemd-devel] Unload disabled units

2019-09-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 03:12:22AM +, Daniel Duong wrote: > Hi, > > I have a 2 template units: 1 for a service and 1 for a socket. Each > instance is a version of my web application. > > After a successful deploy, I stop and disable the old version and I > enable the new one: > systemct

Re: [systemd-devel] Replacement for JoinControllers

2019-10-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 09:34:09AM +0200, azu...@pobox.sk wrote: > Hi guys. > > recently, we upgraded one of our servers from Debian Stretch > (systemd version 232-25+deb9u12) to Debian Buster (systemd version > 241-7~deb10u1). Soon after, we found out that setting > 'JoinControllers' is not longe

Re: [systemd-devel] cannot unsubscribe from this list

2019-10-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:08:24PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > I initiated an unsubscribe from this web page: > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/systemd-devel > > That created a confirmation email, that I replied to. Yeah, that doesn't work. Use the web interface: > https://l

[systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
In principle, the watchdog for services is nice. But in practice it seems be bring only grief. The Fedora bugtracker is full of automated reports of ABRTs, and of those that were fired by the watchdog, pretty much 100% are bogus, in the sense that the machine was resource starved and the watchdog

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:54:31AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:50:44 + > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > In principle, the watchdog for services is nice. But in practice it seems > > be bring only grief. The Fedora bugtracker is full of

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 05:50:44PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > In principle, the watchdog for services is nice. But in practice it seems > > be bring only grief. The Fedora bugtracker is full of autom

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
g. There might be cases where the kernel is dead-locked internally, and e.g. open() or modprobe() never returns. For those cases it might be useful to get the backtrace, but actually killing the process and/or storing the coredump is useful. Zbyszek > > Umut > > On Mon, Oct 21,

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:35:13AM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:34:45PM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote: > > > I am curious Zbigniew of how you find out if the coredum

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 02:56:55PM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:45:32AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:35:13AM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-

[systemd-devel] getting ready for v244

2019-10-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi everyone, I think it's time to get ready for a v244-prerelease. Currently, 8 issues are open on https://github.com/systemd/systemd/milestones/v244 without a PR. I'll be working on the remaining issues and hope to release an -rc1 late this week or early next. If there is stuff I should review

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:30:33PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 21.10.19 17:50, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > In principle, the watchdog for services is nice. But in practice it seems > > be bring only grief. The Fedora bugtracker is

Re: [systemd-devel] Dead link in the documentation of the Journal File Format on freedesktop.org

2019-11-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:12:55PM +, kein name wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to report a dead link in the documentation of the Journal File > Format on freedesktop.org[1]. > The link[2] goes to gmane.org which is dead, it should probably use your own > mailing list archive[3]. Thanks, updated.

Re: [systemd-devel] Please reopen issue #12506

2019-11-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:41:20AM +, Marcos Mello wrote: > Although util-linux's fstab.d work has stalled, there is still systemd code > that needs porting to libmount. See Karel's last comment: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/12506 Reopened. Zbyszek _

Re: [systemd-devel] No error even a Required= service does not exist

2019-11-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 06:13:17PM +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote: > On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 15:19 +0200, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > > Requires=xyz.service > > > > > > produces no complaint and starts the service even if there is no > > > xyz.service > > > Is this the normal behavior or can I configure

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Why does initrd-parse-etc.service re-start initrd-fs.target?

2019-12-14 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 11:58:37AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 09.12.2019 10:06, Ulrich Windl пишет: > >> > >> After real root is mounted daemon-reload re-runs fstab generator which > >> parses real root /etc/fstab and may pull mount points from it. > > > > I wonder: Are there realistic cases

Re: [systemd-devel] Minimize systemd for kdump's initramfs

2020-01-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:21:26AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > Some component, like Systemd, have grown by a lot, here is a list of > the size of part of binaries along with the binaries they required in > F31: > /root/image/bin/systemctl > 20M . > /root/image/usr/bin/systemctl > 20M . > /r

Re: [systemd-devel] Minimize systemd for kdump's initramfs

2020-01-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 03:29:26PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Kairui Song writes: > > > What I'm trying to do is reduce the initramfs size used for kdump. > > Kdump loads a crash kernel and kdump initramfs image in a prereseved > > memory region, which get booted when current kernel crashed a

Re: [systemd-devel] Minimize systemd for kdump's initramfs

2020-01-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 11:48:53AM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > On 01/03/20 at 11:45am, Dave Young wrote: > > On 01/02/20 at 09:02am, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:21:26AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > > > > Some component, like Syst

[systemd-devel] lunch&meet before devconf

2020-01-09 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Dear all, we'll be having an open meeting in Brno on Thursday, Jan 23rd, 2020, before the DevConf.cz conference. Everyone interested in systemd development is invited. The plan is to meet for lunch around 1 PM, and then go the Red Hat office afterwards for discussion and planning. We should be at

Re: [systemd-devel] lunch&meet before devconf

2020-01-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Dear all, > > we'll be having an open meeting in Brno on Thursday, Jan 23rd, 2020, > before the DevConf.cz conference. Everyone interested in systemd > development is invited. The plan is to meet for lunch around 1 PM, and > then go

Re: [systemd-devel] Minimize systemd for kdump's initramfs

2020-02-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 01:12:08PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 3:23 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 11:48:53AM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > > On 01/03/20 at 11:45am, Dave Young wrote: > > > > On 01/02/20

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-daemon documentation clarification

2020-03-03 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 01:38:54PM +0100, Łukasz Niemier wrote: > > AFAIK both stdout and stderr even get attached to the same journal pipe by > > default, so they should also be interpreted in the same way. > > > > The description of SyslogLevelPrefix= in systemd.exec(5) also says: "This > > on

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 245-rc2

2020-03-03 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 07:43:22AM +, systemd tag bot wrote: > A new systemd ☠️ pre-release ☠️ has just been tagged. Please download the > tarball here: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/archive/v245-rc2.tar.gz It's mostly bufixes, but still 146 commits since -rc1. The plan is t

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC] pstore: options to enable kernel writing into the pstore

2020-03-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 01:05:22PM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote: > >Below is a proposal for adding a couple of settings to the systemd pstore > >service so that it can enable the kernel parameters that allow the > >kernel to write into the pstore. Hi, please submit this as PR. > > From 837d716c6e7

Re: [systemd-devel] user service conflict and confusion

2020-04-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:53:36AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Greetings, > > I am hitting a confusing scenario with my system. I am running 245.4-2 > (Debian). > > I have a user service, mpd, which is failing to start. It is enabled: > > $ systemctl --user is-enabled mpd > enabled > > And

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >