On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 21:33, Mike Thompson wrote:
> In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest
> service makes a distinction between ATVs, highway vehicles, and "OHVs > 50"."
> The first two categories correspond to the tags motorcar=* and atv=* I think,
> but I hav
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 15:47, Markus wrote:
> I've noticed that recycling:food= has been added [1] to
> amenity=recycling wiki page with the meaning "community fridge [2] to
> help reduce food waste".
>
> [1]:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Drecycling&diff=1908674
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 14:43, Tobias Wrede wrote:
> Isn't the addr:* scheme used to describe the physical address of a
> location/building/amentiy/etc.?
>
> PO Boxes, privat bags etc. are addresses where mail for someone residing at
> said location is delivered to.
>
> As addr:* I would always p
On 18 September 2013 18:44, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> We already tag the whole site as landuse=allotments and we just need to
> mark individual plots with allotment[s]=plot(*). This makes it clear
> it's an allotment plot we're talking about, not anything else.
>
> Each plot will probably have a "
On 22 September 2013 15:34, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I wouldn't tag them as man_made=tower
Me neither. The typical large metal framework structures for carrying
high-voltage electricity cables would be unlikely to be called towers
in normal British English language usage. I would guess that m
On 7 October 2013 17:09, fly wrote:
> I wonder if it is useful to tag bicycle=dismount on ways.
>
> At least in Germany there is no official traffic sign despite of the
> existence of some.
I don't think the issue here is really whether there is a need within
instances of "no cycling" to distingu
On 10 October 2013 15:28, fly wrote:
> +1 for a separate tag and deprecating bicycle=dismount
To make the case for this clearer, consider the following. There are
four combinations of access for bicycles and cyclists, depending on
whether you are allowed to cycle and/or allowed to
push a bike:
On 14 October 2013 16:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2013/10/14 Richard Mann
>>
>> bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing
>
> +1, for routing that should be sufficient, but not for mapping ;-)
> If they are explicitly forbidden on all ways it would not be bad to have it
On 12 November 2013 18:16, Pee Wee wrote:
> Together with user Masimaster I've made a proposal for a new tag to improve
> bicycle routing. I think (and hope) the wiki is clear enough but I’ll say a
> few words about this new tag.
>
> The tag is introduced to separate 2 kinds of roads where you are
On 13 November 2013 23:06, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> In the Netherlands, segways, rollerblades, and skateboards are allowed
> on bike paths. In Austria, segways and rollerblades are allowed on
> bike paths, but skateboards are not. In Germany, segways are allowed
> on bike paths, but rollerblades
On 14 November 2013 09:13, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> I don't see why you can't tag the roads you're talking about
>> with bicycle=no (or maybe something like bicycle=restricted for the
>> cases where more significant use is allowed) and then add a second tag
>> along the lines of bicycle:restr
On 30 May 2014 08:28, Dave F. wrote:
> I believe byway shouldn't be deprecated. In my area most of them are signed
> as just 'byway' on the ground. There is no indication of their legal status
> (BOATs etc),
An official-looking council-installed sign saying "Byway" will almost
certainly be indica
On 24 July 2014 00:10, Dave F. wrote:
> Thanks for pointing that out to me. As I said, I personally had no problem
> with 'NR' but I'd be OK with it's removal is there was some king of infill.
> ATM there is none & it looks virtually invisible.
I'm not sure if this is in the right place, but I've
On 7 May 2015 at 23:11, pmailkeey . wrote:
> Tips on tagging a village sign please.
>
> Village sign: an ornate sign located fairly central to the village - such as
> on the village green.
There are lots of these signs near where I live. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Village_sign for examples.
On 15 June 2016 at 13:10, John Willis wrote:
> Why isn't having a footway=trail subtag (or something) seen as a much more
> reliable solution?
Perhaps more of an aside, but it may explain some people's reluctance
/ confusion with highway=trail:
As a native British English speaker, the word I wou
On 22 February 2017 at 19:56, Dave F wrote:
> A place where letters & parcels are sent to be sorted so they can then be
> delivered?
>
> In the Britain I think they'd normally be called a sorting office. but
> there's only 21 & 2 for postal_sorting_office from tag info
>
> Is post_depot the same t
On 30 November 2017 at 22:45, Daniel Koć wrote:
> While making some cleaning in osm-carto we have found that leisure=common
> and leisure=village_green are probably not clear enough to show them any
> more. They both have deep roots in British law and history and are
> frequently misused, as far a
On 16 September 2013 14:25, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> Stefano Fraccaro wrote:
>> I have some shops that sell only household goods like dishes, pots, coffee
>> makers, blenders, oven thermometers, ...
>> IMHO "shop=supermarket" and "shop=general" are non appropriate. Which is
>> the correct tag?
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
