Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Silviu On 12 May 2001 at 09:56:22 +0300 (which was 07:56 where I live) Silviu Cojocaru rearranged electrons to get > It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to someone, > with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ?

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Silviu Cojocaru ! On Sat, 12 May 2001 09:56:22 +0300 GMT your local time, which was 12.05.2001, 08:56 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: > It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send > to someone, with PGP, I need his/her

TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread daveiw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Please help, I receive messages from work under the address dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between the *n* and the *(* ). If I 'reply'to this message it of course goes back to the sender, however if I were t

Re: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear daveiw On 12 May 2001 at 08:59:30 +0100 (which was 08:59 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] thoughtfully wrote the following > Please help, I receive messages from work under the address dave.wilson > (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between t

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Thomas
Hello Gerd, On Sat, 12 May 2001 09:50:25 +0200 GMT (12/05/2001, 15:50 +0800 GMT), Gerd Ewald wrote: >> And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I >> sent to him/her, that user must have *my* public key right ? GE> No, the recipients needs his/her secret key to decrypt the me

Re: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread Thomas
Hello Dave, On Sat, 12 May 2001 08:59:30 +0100 GMT (12/05/2001, 15:59 +0800 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dcn> Please help, I receive messages from work under the address dcn> dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between the *n* and the dcn> *(* ). If I 'reply'to this m

Re: ! and GnuPg ?

2001-05-12 Thread Silviu Cojocaru
Thursday, May 10, 2001, 4:26:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 >> Its my opinion that GPG is not ready for windows yet, > GPG is not even available for Windows ... it's for DOS ;-) >> but have fun. > oh, but i have ! > seriously, it works just

Re: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello daveiw, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 9:59:30 AM, you wrote: dcn> Please help, I receive messages from work under the dcn> address dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between dcn> the *n* and the *(* ). If I 'reply'to this message it of course dcn> goes back to the sender,

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas ! On Sat, 12 May 2001 16:38:41 +0800 GMT your local time, which was 12.05.2001, 10:38 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: >>> And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I >>> sent to him/her, that user must have *my*

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David! On Saturday, May 12, 2001 at 9:18:02 AM you wrote: > No. You can encrypt the message to as many keys as you like the minimum is > one i.e. the recipient. However this is a bit silly as once encrypted you

Re: deleting threads behaivor

2001-05-12 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Brandt! On Saturday, May 12, 2001 at 2:54:23 AM you wrote: > When I use shift-crtl-del to kill threads, I always get booted back > to the top of my list. Is this a behavior I can get around, or a bug? > It doesn't happen when I delete regu

Re[2]: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread David Elliott
Yes -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List: Unsubscribe: You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re[2]: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread daveiw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 9:38:30 AM, you wrote: DE> What is the [Reply To:] from the original email ? The 'Reply To' is "Wilson, Dave I (Dept)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Dept) - -- Best regards, Dave Wilson. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (E-mail me

Re[3]: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello daveiw On 12 May 2001 at 11:07:44 +0100 (which was 11:07 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points DE>> What is the [Reply To:] from the original email ? > The 'Reply To' is "Wilson, Dave I (Dept)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: ! and GnuPg ?

2001-05-12 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Silviu, On 12 May 2001 at 11:48:37 +0300 (which was 09:48 where I live) Silviu Cojocaru wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: SC> Why does TB have problems when trying to import GnuPG public SC> keys ? This might be the moment to m

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Thomas
Hello Gerd, On Sat, 12 May 2001 11:03:49 +0200 GMT (12/05/2001, 17:03 +0800 GMT), Gerd Ewald wrote: GE> Even if B doews not have the senders public key, in our example pKa, GE> she would be able to decrypt the message. She wouldn't be able to GE> verify the signature but she could reveal the pla

Outbox pointing on the Wrong folder

2001-05-12 Thread Maxime.Moulin
Hello, In a multiple account use, one of my outbox links on another account outbox. For example : smtih's outbox link on the john's outbox folder. How can i change that as the smith outbox folder option are inn gray. I can't change The directory or anything. Thanx for your help Xcuse my en

Re: basic template question

2001-05-12 Thread A Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 12 May 2001 07:52:34 +0300, Silviu wrote these words of wisdom: >> Would someone give me an example of how I would set up a NEW template >> for my TBUDL folder to set the TO: field to the list address. SC> Are you sure you want to do thi

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread A Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 12 May 2001 18:42:34 +0800, Thomas contributed this to our collective wisdom: GE>> Even if B doews not have the senders public key, in our example pKa, GE>> she would be able to decrypt the message. She wouldn't be able to GE>> verify the sig

Re[4]: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread daveiw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 11:23:44 AM, you wrote: DE> So if you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is wrong. DE> What happens if you type [EMAIL PROTECTED] is that wrong ? Unfortunately neither go to my work address, but the other Dave

Re: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello daveiw, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 12:07:44 PM, you wrote: dcn> The 'Reply To' is "Wilson, Dave I (Dept)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Dept) What happens if you use exactly this address in the To: field of a new message? My guess is that you companys mail system uses the "Wilson, Dave I (Dept)"

TB and OpenPGP

2001-05-12 Thread Silviu Cojocaru
Hopefully this will be the last message about this stuff that comes from me. I imported the public key of a friend of mine into the key manager but I cant set the validity level... Whenever I try to check the signature of his mail it turns out invalid and there's a grey dot in the Validity col

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Thomas
Hello Allie, On Sat, 12 May 2001 06:25:31 -0500 GMT (12/05/2001, 19:25 +0800 GMT), A Curtis Martin wrote: T>> Would she? I think you do need the sender's public key to drecypt a T>> message. Maybe I'm wrong about this? ACM> AFAIK, you only need the senders public key to verify their signatures.

Re: TB and OpenPGP

2001-05-12 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Silviu Cojocaru ! On Sat, 12 May 2001 15:55:51 +0300 GMT your local time, which was 12.05.2001, 14:55 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: > I imported the public key of a friend of mine into the > key manager but I cant set the validity leve

Re: TB and OpenPGP

2001-05-12 Thread Silviu Cojocaru
Saturday, May 12, 2001, 3:55:51 PM, Silviu Cojocaru wrote: > Hopefully this will be the last message about this stuff that > comes from me. > I imported the public key of a friend of mine into the > key manager but I cant set the validity level... Whenever I try > to check the signature of h

Re: TB and OpenPGP

2001-05-12 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Silviu, On Sat, 12 May 2001, at 15:55:51 +0300 you wrote: SC> I imported the public key of a friend of mine into the key SC> manager but I cant set the validity level... Whenever I try SC> to check the signature of his mail it turns out invalid and SC> there's a grey dot in the Validity column

Re: TB and OpenPGP

2001-05-12 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Silviu, On 12 May 2001 at 15:55:51 +0300 (which was 13:55 where I live) Silviu Cojocaru wrote to TBUDL and made these points: SC> I imported the public key of a friend of mine into the SC> key manager but I cant set the validity level... Whenev

Re: folder popup delay time

2001-05-12 Thread CaLViN
Hello Batters, > So when I drag an email onto the top Personal Mails folder it takes > about 4 seconds until the folder opens up and displays the > sub-folders. How can I reduce this delay? One option would be to use the keyboard. Hit CTRL-V and you can navigate through the folder structure easi

Re[2]: Edit Message Window

2001-05-12 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Friday, May 11, 2001, 10:52:32 AM, David Elliott wrote: > Whilst replying to the email from the edit window choose [View] then > un-tick [Original text] Excellent. -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat!

Re[5]: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hail Dave, On 12 May 2001 at 13:17:26 +0100 (which was 13:17 where I live) Dave Wilson wrote and made these points DE>> So if you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is wrong. DE>> What happens if you type [EMAIL PROTECTED] is that wrong ? > Unf

Re: Edit Message Window

2001-05-12 Thread Silviu Cojocaru
Friday, May 11, 2001, 6:52:32 PM, David Elliott wrote: >> If I reply a message, at 'edit mail message' window, there is >> two window. One for write message and one for read original >> message. I want to elimininate the window for reading >> original message. How to do it? > Whilst replying to

Re[2]: Edit Message Window

2001-05-12 Thread j. allen r. day
SC> I've always wondered since I started using TB what good does SC> that "Original text" window do... I used to use it all of the time, until I switched over to a laptop with a low 800 x 600 resolution & had to conserve screen space where I could. When handling my personal mail, I don

Re: TB and OpenPGP

2001-05-12 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 12, 2001, at 6:19:48 AM, Gerd Ewald wrote: > The validity is set by signing the key with your secret key. But this > means you have verified the authenticity of the public key by comparing > the fingerprint with your friend. Correct, but also

Re: Outbox pointing on the Wrong folder

2001-05-12 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 12, 2001, at 3:50:13 AM, Maxime.Moulin wrote: > In a multiple account use, one of my outbox links on another account > outbox. For example : smtih's outbox link on the john's outbox folder. Do you mean that messages in the Outbox for Account

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 11, 2001, at 11:56:22 PM, Silviu Cojocaru wrote: > It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to > someone, with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ? Correct. Contained within that Public Key are all the User Pre

Re: PGP question regarding encrypting messages

2001-05-12 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 12, 2001, at 4:25:31 AM, A Curtis Martin wrote: > AFAIK, you only need the senders public key to verify their signatures. > However, to decrypt an encrypted message to you, you only need your > private key to decrypt it. The messages encryptio

Re: Changing Dictionaries

2001-05-12 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 11, 2001, at 10:52:24 PM, John Phillips wrote: > OK. I downloaded the International Pack, selected British English for > the spell checker. > Still uses the American English dictionary. In what respect? Do you mean that as you type the mess

Re: Filtering on 'reply-to'

2001-05-12 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 10, 2001, at 11:43:00 PM, Maurice Snellen wrote: > I subscribe to a number of mailinglists where people will often send > announcements to more than one list. My current filtering setup causes > all these crossposts to end up in the folder of

Re: deleting threads behaivor

2001-05-12 Thread Cilfa
Hello Brandt, Long time ago, on Saturday, May 12, 2001, 2:54:23 AM, you wrote: > Hello TBUDL, > When I use shift-crtl-del to kill threads, I always get booted back > to the top of my list. Is this a behavior I can get around, or a bug? > It doesn't happen when I delete regular messages. Th

Re[2]: deleting threads behaivor

2001-05-12 Thread Cilfa
Correction: > This strange behavior you mention will not occur when you select the > "root" e-mail of the to-be-deleted thread. You have to close the thread first before you hit CTRL+SHIFT+DEL :) Cilfa -- __ Archives :

Re[2]: Changing Dictionaries

2001-05-12 Thread John Phillips
Hello Nick You wrote On Sat, 12 May 2001, at 09:55:34 [GMT -0700] (02:55 Australian Eastern Time,Sunday): > In what respect? Do you mean that as you type the message, TB! isn't > correcting words like "favorite" and suggesting you change it to > "favourite"? That would be a function of SpellCh

Re: Changing Dictionaries

2001-05-12 Thread Nick Andriash
On May 12, 2001, at 12:24:53 PM, John Phillips wrote: > But if I click on "Dictionaries" when the spell checker pops up, the > next pop up window ("Edit Dictionaries") says that American English > (oxymoron?) is being used. Confirmed. Nick -- -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=-

Re: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello David, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 5:24:54 PM, you wrote: DE> (3) I can not understand how any mail routed to you at work can DE> get to you if it had been routed to "Wilson, Dave I (Dept)" DE> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> it must be looking at the info from DE> "Wilson, Dave I (Dept)" and not <[EMAIL

Re: Changing Dictionaries

2001-05-12 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 12, 2001, at 12:48:56 PM, Nick Andriash wrote: > Confirmed. Sorry, forgot to add that although I confirm the behaviour, nevertheless it's the British Dictionary that is actually used. :o) Nick - -- -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Cana

Re[2]: deleting threads behaivor

2001-05-12 Thread Brandt
Hello Cilfa, You're correct as far as my TBUDL folder is concerned. However another mailing list I am on that does not use refernce numbers, this does not hold true for. On it I am booted back to the top regardless of where in the thread I am, or if it is expanded or not. I'm guessing that after

Re[2]: Outbox pointing on the Wrong folder

2001-05-12 Thread Maxime.Moulin
Bonjour Nick, NA> Do you mean that messages in the Outbox for Account "A" are somehow linked NA> to messages in the Outbox of Account "B"? I've never heard of that NA> happening before... and if that's the case, perhaps the answer lies in NA> some kind of Account sharing setup in Network & Admini

Re[2]: folder popup delay time

2001-05-12 Thread André Engelhardt
Hello CaLViN, On Saturday, May 12, 2001 at 15:52:04GMT +0200 (which was 3:52:04 PM where I live) you wrote: C> Hello Batters, >> So when I drag an email onto the top Personal Mails folder it takes >> about 4 seconds until the folder opens up and displays the >> sub-folders. How can I reduce t