Re: [U2] UV PE Linux

2011-03-04 Thread Brian Leach
All I'm told it is on the way - apparently it's been in the queue for getting onto the Rocket website for a couple of weeks now. Just like the other UniVerse 11 stuff :( It exists - really - I was able to get a private download direct from Rocket to test out a specific issue that I needed to

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 04/03/11 00:55, Bill Brutzman wrote: It is not clear to me how SubVersion and GIT developers refer to the latest rev of their subs. Also the reverse...what programs use the subs. This is where OSGI fits in. I have heard rumblings that people are working on an Eclipse-compatible OSGI

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 03/03/11 20:50, Tony Gravagno wrote: Some people apparently have brains that toggle IF NOT ELSE faster than others. But apparently this construct is of concern to some people, whether as a matter of elegance or a matter of coding effectiveness. Recognizing this, the more I can eliminate

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 03/03/11 06:04, Allen E. Elwood wrote: I dunno, just makes me laugh every time I think about the fact that at the lowest level there is really no such thing as digital because electricity is analog lol Is it? Quantum and all that? Actually, I think I'd sort of agree with you.

Re: [U2] Git and U2

2011-03-04 Thread Steve Romanow
The difference I see here is whether you are talking about a library or tool you intend to share vs internal code that is not for public use. Companies would keep their internal work in repo's they host on their own servers. Something I have not come to grips with is in the dvcs world, it is

Re: [U2] Git and U2

2011-03-04 Thread Steve Romanow
On 3/3/2011 7:09 PM, Doug wrote: I think the idea of Distributed Version Control System (DVSC) has some merit for certain applications. Google Code supports Subversion, and Mercurial and maybe others in its DVSC system. Several of our customers make us jump through hoops to get at their source

Re: [U2] UV PE Linux

2011-03-04 Thread Bob Little
Good to know it's on its way. Thanks for the info. Doesn't seem to ease the frustration however. :) -bob -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Brian Leach Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 3:49 AM To: 'U2

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Mecki Foerthmann
What absolute and utter rubbish! You never had to write IF (test) ELSE ... in Pick. READ did have a THEN clause as far back as I can remember (mid-80s) - only LOCKED came later. You just don't use it that often because you usually only want to do something if your READ fails. Typically READ rec

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Mecki Foerthmann
Come on - if something can be in two or more places at the same time it is digital? On 04/03/2011 10:54, Wols Lists wrote: On 03/03/11 06:04, Allen E. Elwood wrote: I dunno, just makes me laugh every time I think about the fact that at the lowest level there is really no such thing as digital

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread bradley . schrag
Come on - if something can be in two or more places at the same time it is digital? My hands are digital and they're always in just one place: at the ends of my arms. :-P U.S. BANCORP made the following annotations -

Re: [U2] UV PE Linux

2011-03-04 Thread David Wolverton
Well, I can tell you from an UniData document error on the web site - that web group is SLOW AS MOLASSES at things -- my guess, Rocket's acquisitions mode keeps them in a constant state! g If you have an urgent need, find an alternate way to 'get' the PE download. You could wait a while for the

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Rex Gozar
good comprehension = faster, accurate programming (that's programming, not code execution) We all want fast and accurate programming. To improve comprehension, you have to write code to (a) reveal its logical structure, and (b) reveal the business rules implemented in the code. Sorry, but

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Charles_Shaffer
Rex Gozar Said We all want fast and accurate programming. To improve comprehension, you have to write code to (a) reveal its logical structure, and (b) reveal the business rules implemented in the code. I agree. My first language was C and I went through a phase of cramming as much code as

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread David A. Green
count += (value == 3); Careful some programming languages represent TRUE as -1. (all bits turned on) David A. Green (480) 813-1725 DAG Consulting -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wols Lists Sent:

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Charlie Noah
As usual, Mecki, you expressed my thoughts eloquently. I agree 100%. IF (test) ELSE drives me about as buggy as multiple IF/THEN/ELSE all on the same line. If I can figure out what the original intent was, I change the code so I can understand it at a glance later. I'm not sure why, but OPEN

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Bill Brutzman
When fixing THIS.APP, copy all the source code from THIS.APP.R3 to THIS.APP.R4, complile .R4, test .R4 in a SandBox, change VOC in LIVE from R3 to R4. ED VOC THIS.APP 1: PA 2: RUN BP.INV THIS.APP.R3 --Bill -Original Message- From:

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Bill Brutzman
One year ago, I was editing all of my code with EditPlus, an FTP editor. From an editing perspective, the source code was a file in a folder on a Unix box, the same Unix box that was running UniVerse. Inside UniVerse, there was a file pointer (in VOC) to the source and object code. One of

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Symeon Breen
I still think all of these constructs as just sooo basic that if you can't just read them either which way, then you had better think about another career. From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Rex Gozar Sent: 04 March 2011 14:09

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread George Gallen
Actually, A:B:C NE '' THEN CUMM(M) = A+B+C doesn't slow anything down compared to? If A# OR B# OR C# THEN CUMM(M) = A+B+C Or just CUMM(M) = A+B+C (with no IF) Depending on whether it's expected that the majority of times A,B, or C will have something or won't have a value will determine

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread u2ug
agreed -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen Sent: March 4, 2011 11:05 AM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting? I still think all of these constructs as just sooo

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Rex Gozar
Symeon wrote: I still think all of these constructs as just sooo basic that if you can't just read them either which way,  then you had better think about another career. They are basic, but even good programmers will occasionally ASSUME they understand what's going on when they really don't

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Doug
Bill: You are editing locally: that is how Eclipse works. You must copy from the database or version control to edit the programs in this case. Unidata and Universe do not have an external BASIC compiler. We must compile within the U2 database. We have created tools in Eclipse to copy all or

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Charles_Shaffer
Symeon wrote: I still think all of these constructs as just sooo basic that if you can't just read them either which way, then you had better think about another career. Yes, for an experienced UniBasic programmer. What if there is a new programmer, or a programmer that normally works in

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Rex Gozar
George wrote: Actually, A:B:C NE '' THEN CUMM(M) = A+B+C doesn't slow anything down... I think you're talking about execution speed; I was talking about comprehension. What data type is A? Apparently, it can be an empty string or a number. But more importantly, what does it represent?

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Doug
Hi Bill: I find this very messy. After a program has been changed 50 times, do I really care what the other 49 versions look like in my U2 account. I think not. I sometimes change a program every 1 to 5 minutes as I'm going through testing process. Then sometimes about an hour into it I

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Kevin King
Wow Dave, you really opened up a discussion on this one. We shall call you Pandora... :) ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread George Gallen
In this sense, I'd agree. Descriptive variables can never be a bad thing. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users- boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Rex Gozar Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:57 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Is

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Dave Laansma
Kevin, if you only knew ... Sincerely, David Laansma IT Manager Hubbard Supply Co. Direct: 810-342-7143 Office: 810-234-8681 Fax: 810-234-6142 www.hubbardsupply.com Delivering Products, Services and Innovative Solutions -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Allen E. Elwood
Hey Wol, Now were you talking loop quantum gravity or string theory? (I'm a follower of Dr. Michio Kaku.) An electron is just another piece of matter that exhibits both wave and particle characteristics. A member of the lepton class, sharing both charge, spin and interactions with it's fellow

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Steve Romanow
On 3/4/2011 11:59 AM, Doug wrote: Hi Bill: I find this very messy. After a program has been changed 50 times, do I really care what the other 49 versions look like in my U2 account. I think not. I sometimes change a program every 1 to 5 minutes as I'm going through testing process. Then

[U2] SB+ positions available

2011-03-04 Thread Tom Dodds
I know a company that is looking for SB+ North America based contract programmers for 3 months projects (to test you) and then you commonly get extended for 6 or 9 months more. Work on-site for project kick off, then remote, on-site for code drops and go-live. Pays well, including TL. Please

Re: [U2] SB+ positions available

2011-03-04 Thread Paul Wilson
Where ?? I don't care who at the moment - but where does matter. From: Tom Dodds t...@ix.netcom.com To: U2 User group u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Fri, March 4, 2011 1:01:11 PM Subject: [U2] SB+ positions available I know a company that is looking for

Re: [U2] SB+ positions available

2011-03-04 Thread Tom Dodds
I really don't know anything more than was included in their pre-prepared announcement. Send me you resume and I will pass it on and then you will know. Tom Dodds t...@ix.netcom.com 630.235.2975 On Mar 4, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Paul Wilson wrote: Where ?? I don't care who at the moment - but

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread fft2001
No assumption. You are masking the very issue by merely saying condition when it was a NOT condition :) -Original Message- From: Rex Gozar rgo...@gmail.com To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Fri, Mar 4, 2011 6:09 am Subject: Re: [U2] Is this worth

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread fft2001
And then they (the anonymous they) came out with a version that allowed the source to be unlimited while still limiting the object to 32K Which made the whole world scratch their head. -Original Message- From: Charlie Noah cwn...@comcast.net To: U2 Users List

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread fft2001
The point is, why make a construct which is harder to understand, when it takes the exact same amount of effort to make one which is easier to understand? Answer that one Symeon? Why deliberately obfuscate ? -Original Message- From: Symeon Breen syme...@gmail.com To:

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Ron Hutchings
I am not crazy about IF (condition) ELSE logic but the compiler supports it. The versions of Information I was on did not support THEN on the reads until the 90s. Once it was available we jumped on it. Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:25:48 + From: mec...@gmx.net To:

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Charlie Noah
Hi Ron, I don't know what version you worked on, but I worked with Information in the mid 80s and the THEN was supported, both on READ and IF. I would have gone ballistic if it hadn't been, since I ported many of my utilities. I don't know about OPEN, I rarely use THEN with OPEN even now. I

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread fft2001
Ron is right that the OPEN, and READ did not originally support the THEN clause, just the ELSE. Speaking of Microdata, Ultimate and R83 versions. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Ron Hutchings
Now that you have backed me in a corner, I remember that the READ supported THEN and ELSE. There were a couple of constructs that only had ELSE that had THEN added. Now, I can't remember which they were. Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:16:43 -0600 From: cwn...@comcast.net To:

Re: [U2] Version Control

2011-03-04 Thread Susan Joslyn
David, I agree! This is my main argument for driving the sdlc / change control from within U2. ( And of course my product, PRC. ) Plus you can control all kinds of outside stuff - talking back and forth to other products - from within U2. Those other applications cannot 'drive' the change

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Mecki Foerthmann
OPEN and WRITE come to mind. But that is still no reason to use IF condition ELSE. On 04/03/2011 20:50, Ron Hutchings wrote: Now that you have backed me in a corner, I remember that the READ supported THEN and ELSE. There were a couple of constructs that only had ELSE that had THEN added.

[U2] AUTO: Chris Thornton, Milton Keynes DataStage software engineer, is on leave. (returning 15/03/2011)

2011-03-04 Thread Chris Thornton1
I am out of the office until 15/03/2011. I am on leave until Tuesday 15th March. For 8.5 migration and concierge issues, please email conci...@us.ibm.com For other support issues please email dave.cheese...@uk.ibm.com For techlist (IBM internal mailing list) please contact Tony Curcio. For any

Re: [U2] Is this worth rewriting?

2011-03-04 Thread Wols Lists
On 04/03/11 20:10, Ron Hutchings wrote: I am not crazy about IF (condition) ELSE logic but the compiler supports it. The versions of Information I was on did not support THEN on the reads until the 90s. Once it was available we jumped on it. Exactly. I've only ever really used INFORMATION