Hello I have a list of users with links in class UserList. When I click the
link I need to display the clicked name in another page (DisplayUser). My
code snippet is as follows. When i click the link i get the error : No get
method defined for class: class User expression: link. When I added get/
I was trying to achieve the same thing to use one single web page to markup
into any format desired. What I did was to store HTML markup scriptlet of
popular components in a data source and using metadata on runtime to
determine a view (from my current application architecture)
On wicket side, I u
I will be helping out as well as my company is using extjs and we are
planning to move to wicket from existing web framework
Matt Jensen-2 wrote:
>
>
> I would be willing to contribute to this project, but I don't have the
> knowledge of Wicket internals (nor ExtJS internals, really) to pull o
Assume I have created 2 different sessions:
- standard session
- authenticated session
I have a class MyWebPage with this method:
- MyWebPage(boolean isAuthenticated) : true = request authentication
how do I do this programmatically?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ho
Whats that new wicket security framework?
On 1/12/08, jweekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We seem to be back up to the original interest levels again for our Feb 6th
> London Wicket Users Group event. As we had already pretty much hit our
> capacity for the first conference room we had booked
what matej built isnt that far from the examples we have of datatable
and tree/treetable. he added a ton more chrome, but in terms of
functionality they are pretty much the same...
so exactly what kinds of components would it be nice to see? a weather widget?
-igor
On Jan 12, 2008 7:57 PM, Evan
No, not really. I knew about and used that page. But one of the questions
that came up was about prebuilt components and the like. We used a number
of wiki pages and the examples page and others to ultimately push wicket
through. But a showcase of components being used beyond the rather vanilla
Hi,
reading the javadoc, I could note that
org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.form.DateTextField gets the
Locale if the developer does not supply one. But that it is not true,
once that the simplest constructor, DateTextField(String wicketId),
calls the "most advanced" DataTextField(wicketI
Is there a way for me to go into "Edit Mode" on an AjaxEditableLabel without
clicking on the actual label? I would like to have an Edit link or button
somewhere that will put the field in edit mode when clicked by the user.
Thanks,
g
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxEd
On Jan 12, 2008 5:20 PM, Karen Schaper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out this reference. Sorry though I should have been
> able to find this myself.
No problem. Just mentioned that to save you some time in case you
stumble against more such cases.
Eelco
--
Thanks for pointing out this reference. Sorry though I should have been
able to find this myself.
I appreciate the help.
Karen
> -Original Message-
> From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 6:54 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: I
> I disagree with this answer.
That's great! You are most welcome to disagree. I happen to disagree with
your disagreement.
That's the great thing about OSS... If you disagree strongly enough, then
maybe you can write more stuff on the wiki.
I think you're missing a good opportunity here: look
On Jan 12, 2008 12:50 PM, Evan Chooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know what I was trying to convince my current company to use wicket the
> question of "where else is it used" came up several times. Something like
> that would certainly have helped.
you mean
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/#In
it would be great if you guys could videotape the talks and share them :)
-igor
On Jan 12, 2008 2:33 PM, jweekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We seem to be back up to the original interest levels again for our Feb 6th
> London Wicket Users Group event. As we had already pretty much hit our
>
Ok, so rarely you need to roll your own
IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy, we do provide implementations to
cover most common cases. And even if you do, you only need to know
about IRequestTarget - which has good javadoc, and so does the coding
strategy. You dont need to know anything about the
irequ
On Jan 12, 2008 3:52 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, in your application override newConverterLocator and let it
> return the IConverterLocator instance you want.
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html states this btw. In
case you run into other things, you might want
Yup, in your application override newConverterLocator and let it
return the IConverterLocator instance you want.
Eelco
On Jan 12, 2008 3:28 PM, Karen Schaper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying upgrade some code from the wicket-1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> to the latest wicket.
Hello,
I am trying upgrade some code from the wicket-1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
to the latest wicket.
It appears that the IConverterLocatorFactory no longer exists.
I need to register a custom converter to the application.
Here is my code which will not compile now.
.
getApplicationSetting
Sign-up link so those interested have it handy.
http://jweekend.co.uk/dev/LWUGReg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 12, 2008 11:33 PM, jweekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PS Could someone please update the http://wicket.apache.org/ Wicket home
> page to reflect the fact that our events are now on the first Wednesday of
> every month?
Fixed.
Martijn
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dash
We seem to be back up to the original interest levels again for our Feb 6th
London Wicket Users Group event. As we had already pretty much hit our
capacity for the first conference room we had booked with 4 weeks still to
go, we have now booked a bigger room at Google that seats over 50 people
(th
Thanks, Matej that work.
Dale G. Herrig
- Original Message
From: Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 2:58:28 PM
Subject: Re: How to pass attributes from one page to the next
On Jan 11, 2008 11:54 PM, Dale Herrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 12, 2008 12:50 PM, Evan Chooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I completely agree, actually. I'm not opposed to the idea it just kinda
> struck me as odd at the time. I'm not entirely sure why, but there it is.
> Having one place even as a jumping off point would certainly help adoption.
> I
I completely agree, actually. I'm not opposed to the idea it just kinda
struck me as odd at the time. I'm not entirely sure why, but there it is.
Having one place even as a jumping off point would certainly help adoption.
I know what I was trying to convince my current company to use wicket the
q
As far as i know there are some things on the wiki that explains what
hooks (onXxx) is called when.
And for the public methods this is fine and that should be documented,
but still the rest should remain a black box as much as possibe
On 1/12/08, Dmitry Kandalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat
On Saturday 12 January 2008 23:25:43 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> sure, and all you need to know is that you subclass
> requestcycle.onbeginrequest() and add your own code there and it is
> called at the beginning of the request. why do you need to know the
> sequence of calls that leads to onbeginreques
On Jan 12, 2008 11:11 AM, Dmitry Kandalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 12 January 2008 19:56:41 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>
> I mostly agree but request processing is more exposed to user than xml parser.
> I mean it's easier to came across AjaxRequestTarget,
> RequestCycle#onBegin/EndReques
On Saturday 12 January 2008 19:56:41 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> should we document how our xml parser works? how about how wicket
> assembles parts of markup into different markup fragments? all these
> things have no effect on you as a wicket user.
>
> a question for you, in what way will knowing the
wicket-auth-roles is just an example. its not really meant to be
something you drop into your application, for that there is
wicketstuff-wasp and wicketstuff-swarm
-igor
On Jan 12, 2008 9:14 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have several successful Wicket projects going, and in
In the use case from the ajax autocomplete example the field gets submitted
when the selection
is made with the mouse. Is there a quick way to fix this?
Conny
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autocomplete-Textfield-gets-submitted-twice-on-mouse-click-tp14777002p14777002.ht
As far as I can tell IE7 should be added as supported. Also opera 9.
-Matej
On Jan 12, 2008 6:45 PM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't have to be wicket developers that provide this information. All
> may chip in with there results. A good benchmark would be the various ajax
> e
Look at the modal window example. The window in example can be closed
by a link or closed window and you can see what closed it on the
original page. Use similar approach in your case.
-Matej
On Jan 12, 2008 6:55 PM, Roberto Fasciolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've tried that and it works, th
Hi,
On Jan 12, 2008 10:45 AM, Per Newgro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Matej,
> > The issue tracker and SVN repository should be available in near future.
> Maybe i can make an RFE here. It would be nice if the editable grids would
> select the text in the cell if they gain the focus.
Yeah, I li
I've tried that and it works, the problem is that the modal window can be
closed in 2 different ways:
1. clicking on the window's close button, in this case nothing should happen
2. clicking on a link inside the window, in this case the page should change
I haven't found a way for knowing if the
+1
On 1/12/08, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree with this answer.
>
> The fact that request handling stuff is not a public api, is A GOOD REASON
> because it should be documented better, not viceversa.
>
> And I really don't understand in which way this could prevent you to
It doesn't have to be wicket developers that provide this information. All
may chip in with there results. A good benchmark would be the various ajax
examples. F.ex.:
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/repeater/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=%3Aorg.apache.wicket.example
On Jan 12, 2008 2:35 AM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2008 2:28 AM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 2008 5:08 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I just want to let you know that the TreeGrid and DataGrid comp
On Jan 12, 2008 3:25 AM, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Breadcrumbs should not list the history, but the hierarchy of the pages. See
> http://www.useit.com/alertbox/breadcrumbs.html
Interesting. Had I read the article before, it would probably have had
a big effect on the design of the
I have several successful Wicket projects going, and in all have used my own
authorization strategy based on annotations. I'm just trying
wicket-auth-roles for my next project, but seem confused by the apparent
String-only roles. I already have a domain model where a User has a Role or
Role(s), w
You need to call setResponsePage from within WindowClosedCallback.
(see ModalWindow#setWindowClosedCallback());
-Matej
On Jan 12, 2008 5:26 PM, Roberto Fasciolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to find a way for doing this:
> - in page A there's a table with many elements, all
Hello,
I'm trying to find a way for doing this:
- in page A there's a table with many elements, all having a link
- that link opens a modal window with details of the selected element
- in the modal window there's a link that should close the window itself and
make the browser showing page B.
Th
I *strongly* disagree with your answer. The fact is that this
information is only beneficial for a really very small portion of our
user base. The documentation effort on the other hand is HUGE! And
subject to change easily. From 1.1 to 1.2 we changed it quite
considerably. And I have no doubt thi
On Jan 12, 2008 7:16 AM, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree with this answer.
>
> The fact that request handling stuff is not a public api, is A GOOD REASON
> because it should be documented better, not viceversa.
should we document how our xml parser works? how about how wic
I disagree with this answer.
The fact that request handling stuff is not a public api, is A GOOD REASON
because it should be documented better, not viceversa.
And I really don't understand in which way this could prevent you to change
- eventually - in future wicket versions.
I not a newbie user
> >
> > The thing is, we don't really care what the topology is. The only
> > requirement is that the session gets immediately deserialized once it
> > is replicated to other node, which should be either default or at
> > least configurable on most containers.
> >
> > So we let the container manage
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 14:12 +0100, Matej Knopp wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2008 1:04 PM, C. Bergström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 13:35 +0100, Matej Knopp wrote:
> > > > > > Ideally, NodeB ought to "catch up" when it joins the cluster by
> > > > > > syncing the content in
On Jan 12, 2008 1:04 PM, C. Bergström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 13:35 +0100, Matej Knopp wrote:
> > > > > Ideally, NodeB ought to "catch up" when it joins the cluster by
> > > > > syncing the content in the disk page stores at that time. I
> > think
> > > > > it's a fl
Hi,
> > I tried adding breakpoints, but I lack the source. I guess i have to
> > attached it in my eclipse.
>
If you are using eclipse and maven read the following documentation.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin/examples/attach-library-sources.html
br,
edgar
--
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 13:35 +0100, Matej Knopp wrote:
> > > > Ideally, NodeB ought to "catch up" when it joins the cluster by
> > > > syncing the content in the disk page stores at that time. I
> think
> > > > it's a flaw we should track and fix at some point.
> > > >
> > > > Nice job, Matej!
> >
Breadcrumbs should not list the history, but the hierarchy of the pages. See
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/breadcrumbs.html
Tom
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Hello Alan,
yes, I know that example. But as I wrote I'm not using Panels but Pages. And
I don't understand that example very well anyway. Ma
currently not.
make a feature request for that (and mention the settings that would be nice
to have then)
The thing iis at what time do you want to set those?
johan
On 1/11/08, blueneogeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to be able to set different webrequestcycle settin
Hi Matej,
> The issue tracker and SVN repository should be available in near future.
Maybe i can make an RFE here. It would be nice if the editable grids would
select the text in the cell if they gain the focus.
But it looks pretty good.
Cheers
Per
--
I like it! Who knows... JSF keeps rambling about a market place for
custom component libraries, .net has such a market place. I don't see
why we shouldn't try to pursuit such an avenue.
Martijn
On Jan 12, 2008 8:47 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there would be a market for co
Thanks! It was really easy.
On Jan 9, 2008 5:09 PM, mfs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well since the WizardStep class already contains a form in it, thats the
> reason he suggested not to use one explicitly, also because wicket
> currently
> doesnt support nested forms i believe.
>
> So basi
> > > > It would be faster if you can help us. :)
> > >
> > > sure, it would probably be faster if i coded your project
> > > for you too :)
> >
> > Cool!
> >
> > Since you're now doing this kind of volunteer work, Igor,
> > how about coding some stuff for me, too? ;-)
> >
> > I'll send you the pr
I looked into this before (martijn also i think) maybe we should see
if we can support this somehow that we can have an objecxt in the
session that also has versions somehow..
You can simulate it by using the pag id and version number as keys for
something tha you store and maybe use something lik
We also have them on wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc i believe
Dont know if that is the latest version and i cant check it at this time
On 1/11/08, Ayodeji Aladejebi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The javadoc does not come with the wicket 1.3 bundle.
>
> Where can the javadoc for all the wicket1.3 build
57 matches
Mail list logo
