I will ask them, DGTG analytical studies need much work,
anyway they see transmutation and nucleosynthesis.
Very solid and reliable data, still far from complete interpretation.
Peter
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
> is it coherent with DGT claims about isotopic anomalies ?
is it coherent with DGT claims about isotopic anomalies ?
2012/8/24 Axil Axil
> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
> consistent to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products.
> These reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and s
And it is also not consistent with the Defkalion analyses.
It is a complex issue.
Peter
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
> to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
> reaction
The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
Yes, Rossi's info
Axil, thanks for the response.
However, I believe researchers have found out that current flows predominantly
on the outermost tube of a MWNT, not the innermost tube. So, in fact, the
doping of Nickel on the outermost tube is probably the reason why they are
getting superconductive behavior.
Jones, did some back of the napkin calculations.
Assuming a fusion event releases 18 MeV (I don't know exactly how much energy a
p + p fusion event would release but I think 18 MeV is a good number to use.)
The energy anomaly would be equal to 0.0002883919194 J. Meaning, there
has to
http://cdn.intechweb.org/pdfs/17002.pdf
The above paper attempts to prove that carbon nanotubes are superconductive
at very high temperatures by imbedding nickel nanoparticles in the outside
wall of a multi walled nanotube and detecting magnetic changes produced by
superconductivity.
This idea ma
Jones, I kept asking myself that if something like this were even remotely
true, that someone would have seen this is as some anomalous heating. So, in
fact, I was thinking of doing what you are suggesting.
Then it hit me, many of the labs doing CNT research would NOT have seen this.
There w
I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of
what starts the cold fusion reaction.
http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco
California
"Speculation: evanescent 'exotic' superconductivity (some form of HTSC) in
heavy-electron 'patches'?
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-hightemperature-superconductivity-in-patchesaug-23-2012
- also examines resistance fluctuations possibly correlated with LENR events
Al
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:15:15 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Dead moving pixies?
>
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2192008/Are-Martian-overlords---just-dead-pixels-camera-Images-beamed-Curiosity-lead-talk-UFOs-Mars.html
>
>T
..surely if they were dead pixels
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:29:22 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
With such a device you can leave the fuel in a long time, burning up most of the
actinides. Reprocessing implies extracting the little that remains, and adding
it to the fresh fuel, so that over the long term there is
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:57:39 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>www.nasa.gov/pdf/636883main_FDR_talk_NIAC_2012_final.pdf
[snip]
There is a drawing of solar panels attached to a fusion rocket. Has it not
occurred to them, that energy is not a problem when you have fusion power? :)
From: Jojo Jaro
Imagine a mat of Carbon nanohorns enveloped by high pressure molecular H2
gas. A considerable amount of H2 molecules will enter the nanohorn pipe
and would almost be trapped there .
Jojo - One practical approach you might consider is to contact any or all of
the variou
I don't know, but there was a Fredrick's of Hollywood ad on the page.
Coincidence? I think not. ;-)
Jeff
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:26 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson <
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> from Jed:
>
> ...
>
> > ...
> ...
> >
> http://www.modellismo.net/forum/statico-kits-info-e-
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
wrote:
> It would be like buying a thousand expensive integrated circuits without
> having independent evaluation of them, and without working with a
> development kit with one of them.
>
No its not. Its like doing a systems test rather than
I meant to say, "And his thermionic catalyst would NOT help the situation
also."
Why?, because thermionic catalyst emissions are inherently uncontrollable.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jojo Jaro
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 10:25 AM
Subject:
WOW, this paper is a gold mine, and most of it went over my head. This quantum
mechanical concepts are way past my paygrade. Maybe Jones, Fran or Axil and
others can chime in. Our resident expert who is "trained" in relativity is
also welcomed to chime in.
What I found interesting is this
You Da man! Mucho Thanks.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: ChemE Stewart
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Topology is Key. Carbon Nanostructures are King
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0112178.pdf
On Thursday, August 23,
Corrrection:
Interestingly, George Miley is a supporter of the fusion/fission hybrid. See
http://fire.pppl.gov/aps06_manheimer.pdf
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Such a concept is not possible politically. Pu239 breeding is not
> acceptable both to the government of the
Such a concept is not possible politically. Pu239 breeding is not
acceptable both to the government of the US and the current head of the
NRC. The thorium based U232/U233 fuel cycle produced by a fusion/fission
hybrid may be acceptable as proliferation resistant because of the high
level of U232 th
>From Abd,
>> > And we need reporters who will look more carefully. Any volunteers?
>
>>I volunteer you.
> Great. Thanks. I accept, any idea about funding?
I would suggest you contact Mr. Krivit and ask him how he funds his NET
reporting. Unfortunately, I don't think Mr. Krivit likes you.
Rega
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0112178.pdf
On Thursday, August 23, 2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
> **
> Does anyone have access to this paper?
>
> "Charge screening effect in metallic carbon nanotubes".
>
> I think this paper may hold the key to engineering the right size carbon
> nanotube.
>
>
> Jojo
>
Does anyone have access to this paper?
"Charge screening effect in metallic carbon nanotubes".
I think this paper may hold the key to engineering the right size carbon
nanotube.
Jojo
Nice model Dave.
Now, try it if the output temperature remains steady at 1200C as Rossi claims.
This implies very little positive feedback. What COP would he achieve?
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 7:54
On 08/23/2012 07:05 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 09:39 AM 8/23/2012, Andre Blum wrote:
Rossi's attempt to scale up did not fail, too.
We don't know that. Generally, in his post, Mr. Blum made a number of
statements, as if they were fact, that are not from independent
sources. [etc, etc.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
wrote:
> Actually, I don't think it's useful to ridicule Rossi, but pointing out
> how his business strategy, if he actually has functioning E-Cats in the 10
> KW range or so, is preposterous, isn't ridiculing him. It's pointing to the
> obviou
I have been fiddling with one of my models of the ECAT and just wanted to let
the group have a peek. Rossi has been active on his journal and suggested
that his device has certain characteristics which my model tends to support.
It should be noted that any model of Rossi's device is going to
In reply to Puppy Dog's message of Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:21:13 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
>After fusion in the ball of plasma is completed, the fusion ash and the left
>over tritium and deuterium find its way into a diverter that removes it from
>the burn chamber. The high energy neutrons produced by fusio
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:51:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I do not think there is evidence that this reaction can run away, or
>that it needs input to keep going or to prevent runaway. It needs input
>to trigger the reaction, and to keep the present cell at operating
>t
It is more than highly likely that Advanced Civilizations have thoroughly
achieved a SRC (spinning rotor center) that spins within a SHOE at least
60,000 RPM's (1,000 RPS's).
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 22 Aug 2012 01:29:06 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>
>Yes, it might be possible to control the device by limiting the fuel as you
>suggest. Once you sense something and use that information to adjust the
>fuel, you have enclosed the positive feedback insid
At 01:24 PM 8/23/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
In my opinion we should not even consider using cold fusion for
commercial or practical purposes before we are ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN it
can be fully controlled, and it does not produce dangerous
radiation. Not at start up, not in an accident, not ever. U
I meant to say:
As often happens, someone suggested GOVERNMENTS may use regulation as an
excuse to suppress the technology.
- Jed
At 09:52 AM 8/23/2012, James Bowery wrote:
While the Capronismo is humorous (did they envision ground effect?)
the comparison really isn't fair. Rossi's 1MW heat plant is low
complexity and makes a lot of sense from the standpoint of
industrial learning curve:
Base it on a standard unit of r
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> Investigational devices, sold with appropriate warnings, etc., would not
> need to meet those requirements.
>
That's true. For that matter, devices provided to UL and to the safety
agencies will not need to meet the requirements, but you cannot charge for
them.
If
At 09:39 AM 8/23/2012, Andre Blum wrote:
Rossi's attempt to scale up did not fail, too.
We don't know that. Generally, in his post, Mr. Blum made a number of
statements, as if they were fact, that are not from independent
sources. Like the claim that the 1 MW E-cat is "industrially
certified
At 01:48 PM 8/23/2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Ha!
LOL we have talked about this marvel
before and as being the perfect
> Rossi metaphor.
Looks reliable to me:
3 engines, 9 wings, 27 windows, seating 81,
someone had a trinity fetish
I have rewritten my ICCF17 presentation from my scintillating
conversational style into boring academese. I crammed it into the ICCF17
template. I would appreciate it if someone would volunteer to read through
it, especially to look for things like missing words caused by voice input
and sloppy typ
At 01:39 PM 8/23/2012, ChemE Stewart wrote:
I agree with Jed on safety. In the US these devices would need to
pass ASME, NFPA, OSHA, UL certifications as well as NRC guidelines
which I have no familiarity with but I am sure will apply based upon
the preliminary results DGT is showing of tran
At 01:30 PM 8/23/2012, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
After a very thorough analysis of the status of CF reporting was
summed up by Abd, he concludes with:
> And we need reporters who will look more carefully. Any volunteers?
I volunteer you.
Great. Thanks. I accept, any idea about fund
Terry Blanton wrote:
> Looks reliable to me:
>
> 3 engines, 9 wings, 27 windows, seating 81,
>
> someone had a trinity fetish
>
I missed that! That's hysterical.
- Jed
I have changed my opinion about the prospects for non-light water reactor
development since I wrote that naïve engineering assessment of FRC hybrid
fusion technology. There are insurmountable regulatory obstacles that block
the path of any “non-standard” nuclear reactor development. From a
scientif
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Ha! … LOL we have talked about this marvel before – and as being the perfect
> “Rossi metaphor”.
Looks reliable to me:
3 engines, 9 wings, 27 windows, seating 81,
someone had a trinity fetish
T
I agree with Jed on safety. In the US these devices would need to pass
ASME, NFPA, OSHA, UL certifications as well as NRC guidelines which I
have no familiarity with but I am sure will apply based upon the
preliminary results DGT is showing of transmutations, low level radiation,
heat & operatin
After a very thorough analysis of the status of CF reporting was
summed up by Abd, he concludes with:
> And we need reporters who will look more carefully. Any volunteers?
I volunteer you.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
James Bowery has it wrong. I am not actually making fun of Caproni and his
Ca-60 Transaereo. This was tragic case. Caproni was a gifted aircraft
designer. During WWI he made over 400 heavy bombers; the largest aircraft
outside of Russia. The biggest one was the Ca-43 triplane, 7 tons, 100 foot
wing
For the sake of the Future of Ourkind, of which we will never get even a
good idea of, let alone a glimpse of,,, I would like to briefly describe the
Capabilities of a genuine UFO, as in an, Extremely Advanced Craft and/or the
Crew Members that operate it.
At 09:08 AM 8/23/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Craig Brown wrote:
First of all, I would be ecstatic if Rossi's eCat was proven, but
the constant regurgitative reportage of "Rossi Says this, Rossi
says that" being pumped out by certain reporters has me reaching
for the vomit bag on an almost daily
James,
Agreed. So far I have just been revising my document as I go instead of
posting new announcements, etc. I am very new to blogging. I also cannot
figure out how to automatically add a signature/link to my blog
automatically to the bottom of my Gmail emails. I am boldfacing any
changes to
While the Capronismo is humorous (did they envision ground effect?) the
comparison really isn't fair. Rossi's 1MW heat plant is low complexity and
makes a lot of sense from the standpoint of industrial learning curve:
Base it on a standard unit of replication with a minimal connecting
infrastruct
From: Jed Rothwell
* The megawatt reactor looks impressive to such people as well. To me, it
looks like a gigantic white elephant. It is a distraction, and an absurd waste
of time and effort… but I would no more crank up the whole thing than I would
try to fly the Caproni Ca-60 Transaereo
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
> I am thinking about a new newsgroup for Evaporative Matter Nuclear
> Science.
>
To help increase the signal-to-noise ratio of your contributions to
vortex-l I suggest you post here in two modes:
1) As a regular participant but with your si
The difference between Celani's 21 W and Rossi's 16 kW is unimportant,
in my opinion. They are equally close to commercialization. The 16 kW
looks more impressive to people who do not understand the technical
issues. The megawatt reactor looks impressive to such people as well.
To me, it look
Found this post in my outbox, it wasn't sent.
At 06:46 PM 8/17/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
The production of neutrons may well be avoidable
if the reaction is properly designed. As a
model, Rossi has been purifying his reaction for
more than a year. My guess is that the use of
Deuterium is condu
from Jed:
...
> The difference between Celani's 21 W and Rossi's 16 kW is unimportant, in my
> opinion. They are equally close to commercialization. The 16 kW looks more
> impressive to people who do not understand the technical issues. The
> megawatt reactor looks impressive to such people as we
I will also suggest that the dark matter around the sun is consuming
hydrogen and radiating heat at up to 5.6×1032K
Dark Matter = Dark Gremlin
They come in different shades and sizes.
On earth as near the sun, best to feed them a steady diet of hydrogen else
you will end up with a mess of fission
Craig Brown wrote:
First of all, I would be ecstatic if Rossi's eCat was proven, but the
constant regurgitative reportage of "Rossi Says this, Rossi says that"
being pumped out by certain reporters has me reaching for the vomit
bag on an almost daily basis.
Yup, it is silly. But why get upse
Gremlins come in different colors:
Brown dwarf ~ Brown Gremlin
White dwarf ~ White Gremiln
Black hole ~.Black Gremlin
Micro black hole ~ Invisible Gremlin
The smaller they are the more elusive and more trouble they cause in their
surroundings.
On Thursday, August 23, 2012, ChemE Stewart w
Jones,
I agree. I believe this reaction starts with a collapse of matter
compressed within a crack or void. As in the macro scale universe, the
degree of collapse may vary all the way down to a micro black hole, which
is the extreme case. Any collapse should be instantly followed by a burst
of
Puppy Dog,
Just a preview of the Chan dancing hydride ion (H-) locked into an
orderly line by a magnetic field courtesy of "The Coil" and Ni/C nano
structures, but oscillating to the beat of an RFG accelerant.
Reminds me of the recently proposed Noble Gas Engine theory where He-
(Helium-elec
Axil,What ever happened in the field of FRC? You predicted the fruit of efforts would ripen in 2013 and be ready for harvesting.Cheers,Puppy Dog (AKA DD or Detective Dog)<<
62 matches
Mail list logo