Could it be that the formation of untold numbers of SPP micro black holes
in space throughout the entire volume of the universe might produce an
excess of negative energy bubbles over their positive energy counterparts.
These negative bubbles of vacuum energy might disrupt the normally neutral
bal
Hi Esa,Yep, they announced on their Facebook page today that they would reveal the price during the Live webinar.I honestly have no idea of the price, but I can't see it being out of reach of the pockets of normal members of the public. After all, this is an attempt to sell a consumer grade electri
Wow Craig, just read that the price of the O-Cube will be revealed today!
I sincerely hope it's in the 100s to the 200 euros, rather than 500-1000-2000+
euros.
as I seriously could maybe afford that if it's <200€.
maybe.
http://freeenergy.news/steorn-orbo/o-cube-price-to-be-revealed-as-steorn-we
Personally, I'm VERY excited and it's been a long time coming, but worth the wait.Been following the lads at Steorn since 2006.Enjoying the build-up to it immensely.I think it's interesting that no one is talking about Steorn just now, but in a week or soLOLGet ready as the impossible becomes p
So, anyone excited at all for the Steorn O-Cube webinar starting today?
starts in 13+ hours, at http://app.webinarjam.net/register/19428/91401be0a7
On 22 October 2015 at 23:54, Terry Blanton wrote:
> No joy.
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
>
> - Reply message -
> From
I don't think that there are experts in particles created in condensed
matter physics. Holmlid is the first. We can't wait for experts to develop
out of the vacuum.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
> Yup with due respect to Holmlid who obviously has good well developed
> exp
Yup with due respect to Holmlid who obviously has good well developed expertise
in the field and years of experience and analysis behind him, we nevertheless
cannot know for sure until other experts are brought in to witness and process
the raw data and ideally the test is repeated independently
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
The alternatives are also hard to explain, however:
>
There is another alternative you didn't mention -- Holmlid has a fertile
imagination and is confused and needs to pull in someone who knows how to
measure charged particle radiation.
Eric
LENR is topological in nature. Shapes are important rather than material.
Mills lists most of the periodic table as having catalytic activity.
Piantelli says the same thing about substrates. LENR converts light into
dipole motion. The catalysts produce nanoparticles dynamically. The gas
must be a d
Not really, I'm more thinking about initially generating individual neutral
mesons or +/- pairs from decay of highly excited nuclei, with no actual nucleon
disintegration before some other kind of decay can occur, which might be almost
as weird.
What you are describing is a direct nucleon disi
Hello Terry,
It was a boring video (and slow) but I have to say that the content is very
compelling.
As I understand there are still some reliability issues as well as cost
issues with the "solar panel + battery" solution.
One of the many advantages I see with his solution is that it is
distributed
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
"*** If I understand correctly there are no sufficiently heavy elements
> available in Holmlids experiment for Kaons to form this way? …"
>
> This is not strictly correct. [ ... snip ... ]
>
Ni 62 and Fe 58 would both therefore be sufficient f
Abstract Observations provide increasingly strong evidence that the
universe is accelerating. This revolutionary advance in cosmological
observations confronts theoretical cosmology with a tremendous challenge,
which it has so far failed to meet. Explanations of cosmic acceleration
within the frame
LENR is not the only threat to coal. Any cost effective energy storage system
is. See Elon Musk's Power Wall introduction speech.
https://youtu.be/yKORsrlN-2k
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
Discovering possible new forces in nature is no mean task. The discovery of
gravity linked to Newton's arguably apocryphal apple experiment has
remained anchored in popular culture. In January 1986, Ephraim Fischbach,
Physics Professor from Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, had
his own
CPT violation must occur to produce charge and real matter. The negative
energy partner is retained inside the tachyon. Only K mesons violate the
CPT symmetry.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
> Assuming Kaons are generated within Ni 62 or Fe 58 Nuclei it still leads
> to so
Assuming Kaons are generated within Ni 62 or Fe 58 Nuclei it still leads to
some other questions:
Why would less energetic particles such as neutral Pions or +/- Pion pairs not
be produced from Nucleus first before the Kaons are generated? This could be
due to a couple of reasons:
1. I
Coal is 39% of U.S. railroad tonnage and 19% of their revenue. See:
https://www.aar.org/BackgroundPapers/Railroads%20and%20Coal.pdf
If cold fusion succeeds US railroads will be in deep trouble. Cold fusion
will have much wider effects than people realize.
Coal use is already declining as shown o
Ron Kita has alerted me to a conference with a session on LENR in 2016. It
is the STAIF 2, the "Space Technology & Applications International Forum"
in Albuquerque, NM USA on April 21-23, 2016. Here is the link to their
site:
http://staif2.org/
They have a session G on LENR that will be cha
Holmlid's remark which states that it takes many weeks of laser stimulation
before the Rydberg catalyst becomes active fits in with the tachyon theory
of LENR fuel preparation.
According to tachyon theory, it takes the storage of 10^6 GeV to form a
tachyon inside a black hole. If we have a trillio
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/oct-27-2015-lenr-info.html
LENR is interesting, surprising, hyperactive (soon) so more will come!
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
In answer to your original question Axil, could this be "why LENR produces
Neutral Kaons"?
1. Nickel 62 or Iron 58 acts as a source of long life K0 through some kind of
external stimulation to greater than 496 MeV, probably collective and entangled
stimulation, possibly from lasers, Phonons, mag
Regarding my earlier Comments :
" for a single K 0 to form this would imply a nucleus of heavier than Nickel…."
"*** If I understand correctly there are no sufficiently heavy elements
available in Holmlids experiment for Kaons to form this way? …"
This is not strictly correct.
Something new and po
23 matches
Mail list logo