In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:15:45 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
We do not yet know what sort of ash Ni-H cold fusion reactions produce. If
Storms is correct, the ash is deuterium which is impossible to detect with
this configuration.
...just for the sake of comparison, the
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
And how do we even know this is cold fusion?
There is no chemical fuel in the cell, so assuming the heat is real, cold
fusion is the only likely source of heat. Also, it resembles many other
cold fusion reactors.
I think you are the one that
From: Blaze Spinnaker
Ø And how do we even know this is cold fusion? I think you are the one that
is leaping to conclusions here. Maybe wait for some kind of ash analysis
first...
Yes that is wise. Any and all pronouncements from the sidelines should await
isotope analysis, since
I am saying that *IF* X is true, Y and Z follow. IF the measurements are
correct, it follows that this is probably cold fusion, and IF it is cold
fusion, it will often continue indefinitely until you quench it.
And this is how you think lenr science should be done?
Also, as I have explained many many times my one estimate is just one guess
of the jelly beans in the jelkybeanjar. You need a lot of guessers to get
something accurate. Preferably folks with a history of being able to guess
accurately. I refuse to let the fact that no one else has the courage
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, as I have explained many many times my one estimate is just one guess
of the jelly beans in the jelkybeanjar. You need a lot of guessers to get
something accurate.
Or, you need one person who makes the effort to understand the technical
Well, your idea of science is to make speculative leaps / assumptions.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, as I have explained many many times my one estimate is just one
guess of the jelly beans in
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In fact with no radioactivity, this looks as much like a version of a
fractional hydrogen reaction - f/H – as nuclear. Isotope analysis could
move it into the LENR camp - but as of now, no conclusion is justified.
There is never much radioactivity from
I'm assuming this is just nonsense but some of the patho-skeptics are
claiming that the russian report would have to produce dry steam in order
to reach the energy levels he's claiming.
While I'm still very skeptical, and his COP numbers have already been
proven to be nonsense, I would assume
Steam Quality1000.950.90.850.8Deg C1,2901,290
1,2901,2901,290min4040404040W498498498498498J
(Elec)
1,195,200 1,195,200 1,195,200 1,195,200 1,195,200kg
Water (Evap) 1.21.141.0260.87210.69768J (Evap) 2,712,000
2,576,400
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming this is just nonsense but some of the patho-skeptics are
claiming that the russian report would have to produce dry steam in order
to reach the energy levels he's claiming.
If you assume the results are in error, they would have to
No, they have not. This is your imagination.
The COP numbers don't include the ramp up to 1000. Stoyan pointed this
out as well.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming this is just nonsense
Thanks chem e .. Very informative.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:58 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Steam Quality1000.950.90.850.8Deg C1,2901,290
1,2901,2901,290min4040404040W498498498498498J
(Elec) 1,195,200 1,195,200
Don't get me wrong, the results are interesting for sure. The COP is
making huge assumptions that the excess energy would continue.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, they have not. This is your imagination.
The COP numbers don't include
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't get me wrong, the results are interesting for sure. The COP is
making huge assumptions that the excess energy would continue.
No, those are not huge assumptions. The excess heat in cold fusion has
often continued, sometimes for weeks or
Jed -- I'm simply taking Stoyan's comment, verified it to make sure I
understood what he was saying, and repeated it.
If you want to call Stoyan ignorant and arrogant, be my guest..
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y3Bxr_aE2iosEKpGFUZiQgAcuT8AFN78RFCAlR-JqNw/edit
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Blaze Spinnakerblazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Note by translator Stoyan Sarg: The initial heating power and temperature
before reaching 1C is not shown in the plot of
And how do we even know this is cold fusion? I think you are the one that
is leaping to conclusions here. Maybe wait for some kind of ash analysis
first...
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
I will say, though Jed, kudos for expressing such confidence in an
experiment so easily replicated. You really are putting your reputation
and credibility on the line here in a way that is very impressive.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
And
19 matches
Mail list logo
