Hi neale,
Sorry for not replying to your email in time.
192.168.2.20 --192.168.3.20 VPP2VPP1
A brief description of the problem:
When vpp without MPLS the ping packet from CE to CE is ok.
When vpp configured MPLS the ping packet from CE to CE is failed ,the
assertion occured at the
Hi Neal,
I fully agree with you. The intend of my message was to point out the effect of
your patch and the need for an L3 output feature, should VLAN 0 with
appropriate PCP/DEI bits be required on certain output packets.
Regards,
John
-Original Message-
From: Neale Ranns (nranns)
Hi John,
Do we want VPP to send on VLAN-0 out of a routed port just because [one] host
on that LAN sent a packet VLAN0 encapped? I didn’t think so.
I agree this solution and the sub-interface solution cannot co-exist, but the
trouble with creating a sub-interface for VLAN-0 is that it will be
Alessio,
I also did an experimental patch to drop chosen UDP packets to a UDS socket.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6721/
Currently being used for integration with DHCPKIT.
Cheers,
Ole
> On 30 May 2017, at 19:37, Florin Coras wrote:
>
> Hi Alessio,
>
> Take a look at
Hi Alessio,
Take a look at udp_register_dst_port () and at how it is used in other places
(e.g., lisp/vxlan).
Cheers,
Florin
> On May 30, 2017, at 1:01 AM, Alessio Silvestro
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am currently working on VPP and I am interested in receiving
Hi Juraj,
Please try this:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6936/
which is intended to implement Ole’s suggestion.
thanks,
neale
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of "Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes -
PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
Date:
Please look at the clib_calljmp(...) call in src/vlib/unix/main.c. It calls the
function "thread0" on the first allocated thread stack. All of the other calls
are similar.
Thanks... Dave
From: Mahesh Ishwar Mathad [mailto:mi.mah...@globaledgesoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:25 AM
To:
Thank you. As you mentioned function f, could you please tell for which
function respected stack is created and what is that function f is
responsible for?
On Tuesday 30 May 2017 05:10 PM, Dave Barach (dbarach) wrote:
Longjmp.S provides setjmp/longjmp and "call a function f on a new stack"
Im sorry im forget to add vpp version and host system.vpp 17.04 and vpp master
17.07, CentOS 7.3 x86_64
--
Yours sincerely,
Denis Lotarev
- Forwarded Message -From: Denis Lotarev To:
"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017, 5:00:49
Hi!
We are testing VPP SNAT plugin, simple SNAT working wheel, but:
In this example:
Client A cannot ping and connect to client B by IP address 2.2.2.3. Client A
can access to internet.
Client B cannot ping and connect to client A by IP address 2.2.2.2. Client B
can access to internet.
Another
The UX for the sample plugin is broken. Especially when you consider
that the people most likely to try it and use it, are those least
familiar with VPP.
I tried the use it a few months ago in training and found the UX similar
then. So I put together a number of changes to integrate the
Hi Ole,
Thanks for the clarification, here's the ticket:
https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-870
Juraj
-Original Message-
From: otr...@employees.org [mailto:otr...@employees.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 May, 2017 10:46
To: Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
HiNagp,
Does this work for you?
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6918/
/neale
From: on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 09:28
To: Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru , vpp-dev
Subject:
Hi Guys,
I need some help in understanding contents of the file ie.
./src/vppinfra/longjmp.S .
--
Thanks & Regards,
Mahesh Mathad.
Disclaimer:- The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s)
Personally, I would be very surprised if it was effective to add actual support
for the OpenFlow protocol to fd.io / vpp.
Having said that, I believe fd.io includes capabilities to provide fine-grain
controls such as 5-tuple acls and policy routing. Is that what you are looking
for?
Yours,
Hi Ole,
Not yet, but i don't know whether fd.io projects can provide fine-grained
traffic control as openflow does, or whether fd.io can be agile on traffic.
What's your opnion?
Regards,
Ewan
yug...@telincn.com
From: otroan
Date: 2017-05-30 15:50
To: yugang
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re:
Dear all,
I am currently working on VPP and I am interested in receiving UDP traffic
at a specific port.
However, I have seen that the project regarding L4 protocols (e.g., TCP,
UDP) namely TLDK (Transport Layer Development Kit), is still a project
proposal.
Is there a simple way to listen to
Hi there Ewan,
> Is there any plan to surpport openflow?
I thought that particular unicorn was dead. ;-)
But if you find a problem openflow solves...
What are you trying to do?
Best regards,
Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Hi,
In the recent change made to the above function to register for ARP events,
it looks like there is an access to the pool elements using pointers across
a pool_get call.
--
while (p && *p != ~0)
{
mc = pool_elt_at_index (am->mac_changes, *p);
if (mc->node_index == node_index
Hi all,
Is there any plan to surpport openflow?
Regards,
Ewan
yug...@telincn.com
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 04:32 +, Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In CSIT we did not observe booting timeouts but in fact our timeout values are
> not that tight.
Ok, would it be possible to share which timeout value do you guys use?
My previous
On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 16:20 +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> On 29/05/2017 15:54, Marco Varlese wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 15:35 +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have not seen that behavior before.
> > >
> > > The dpdk_crypto_sw is only for
22 matches
Mail list logo