Hi all,
what a strange thread. However, I also second to remove these options - all the
stuff already takes too much space if somebody really wants to use the wiki.
Thus, it would have been good to have some agreement or even an info if
somebody changes something that visible. So please remove
Hi Christoph, :-)
The Alfresco platform is installed on a LibreOffice sub-domain (both
portals) and is at the service of every team in the project. The
decision to grant it a subdomain was an officially voted and
documented SC decision. It therefore merits its place in the
LibreOffice wiki top me
Hi,
Not sure this is the correct list BTW so apologies if not.
Recently a call for a 1st North American Community on-line meeting went
out and a Doodle calendar setup to help organize same. The poll was
closed today with a date/time of Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:00 PM EST
(12:00 AM UTC) selected.
Hi Drew,
On 26/04/2011 11:57, drew wrote:
Hi,
Not sure this is the correct list BTW so apologies if not.
Recently a call for a 1st North American Community on-line meeting went
out and a Doodle calendar setup to help organize same. The poll was
closed today with a date/time of Thursday, April 2
On 4/26/11 10:57 AM, drew wrote:
Assuming that is acceptable to everyone then one more question, what
exactly would I need to do, beyond this request, in this regard?
Hi Drew, as Florian is the person with the best overview of our
infrastructure, I think that you should ping him just in case
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 12:02 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> Hi Drew,
> On 26/04/2011 11:57, drew wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not sure this is the correct list BTW so apologies if not.
> >
> > Recently a call for a 1st North American Community on-line meeting went
> > out and a Doodle calendar setup to he
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 11:10 +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> On 4/26/11 10:57 AM, drew wrote:
>
> > Assuming that is acceptable to everyone then one more question, what
> > exactly would I need to do, beyond this request, in this regard?
>
> Hi Drew, as Florian is the person with the best overview o
Hi,
Italo Vignoli wrote on 2011-04-26 11.10:
Hi Drew, as Florian is the person with the best overview of our
infrastructure, I think that you should ping him just in case he is not
subscribed to the website mailing list (I am almost sure he is). But as
Sophie has already told you, you basically
For some reason, I have had problems with the wiki page in edit mode. I
default to the Rich editor mode. If I choose "Disable Rich Editor" and
do some edits and them save, I have had all the data disappear.
The times this has happened is when I have added the script to add the
native language
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 11:28 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Italo Vignoli wrote on 2011-04-26 11.10:
> > Hi Drew, as Florian is the person with the best overview of our
> > infrastructure, I think that you should ping him just in case he is not
> > subscribed to the website mailing lis
Hi all,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 08:46, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi, :-)
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 14:42, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
>
> wrote:
> > Silly game.
> > Strange behaviour.
>
> I agree. So please stop playing, Klaus. ;-)
@David:
could you please try to communicate a little bit more sensi
Hi Nino, :-)
I was a bit surprised at your message. I get the feeling that you're
the one who needs to carefully re-read the threads. Any points of view
I have posted have been perfectly rational and sensible. And I am
certainly not engaged in any "personal struggle" with Sophie or anyone
else. :-
2011/4/26 Marc Paré
> For some reason, I have had problems with the wiki page in edit mode. I
> default to the Rich editor mode. If I choose "Disable Rich Editor" and do
> some edits and them save, I have had all the data disappear.
>
> The times this has happened is when I have added the script
Hi Drew,
drew wrote on 2011-04-26 12.18:
How about a plan to use the TDF and if it is busy (time is our friend
here I think) then we can just open a different one and jump over to it
- at least for this 1st meeting.
sure! Feel free to use the TDF channel, didn't want to deny you that.
:-) Jus
Hi Marc, Paulo,
Am 26.04.2011 13:23, schrieb Paulo de Souza Lima:
2011/4/26 Marc Paré
For some reason, I have had problems with the wiki page in edit mode. I
default to the Rich editor mode. If I choose "Disable Rich Editor" and do
some edits and them save, I have had all the data disappear.
T
2011/4/26 klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
> Hi Marc, Paulo,
> Am 26.04.2011 13:23, schrieb Paulo de Souza Lima:
>
>> 2011/4/26 Marc Paré
>>
>> For some reason, I have had problems with the wiki page in edit mode. I
>>> default to the Rich editor mode. If I choose "Disable Rich Editor" and do
>>> some ed
Hi, :-)
I've updated the Getting Help page on LibreOffice.org with links to
some external forums, and also added information about the Nabble
gateway to put it forward more prominently. See [1].
[1] http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to websit
Hi David, *
David Nelson wrote:
> Hi, :-)
>
> I've updated the Getting Help page on LibreOffice.org with links to
> some external forums, and also added information about the Nabble
> gateway to put it forward more prominently. See [1].
>
> [1] http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/
You're sure y
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 20:17 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi, :-)
>
> I've updated the Getting Help page on LibreOffice.org with links to
> some external forums, and also added information about the Nabble
> gateway to put it forward more prominently. See [1].
>
> [1] http://www.libreoffice.org/ge
David,
please bear with me as I am not an native English speaker, so therefore
I might pick the wrong expression or idiom from time to time.
My mail is intended to disclose possible issues of mutual
misunderstanding. Of course, maybe I'm somtimes exaggerating a bit but
look at it as a caricat
Hi Nino, :-)
I have not read your entire post above, but frankly I consider this kind of
discussion unsuitable, off-topic, misrepresenting the facts and personally
unpleasant. I had thought that the "atmosphere" on the website had calmed
down in comparison to the beginning of the year but it seems
Hi, :-)
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 21:07, drew wrote:
> Hi David
>
> You should of read the entire 'forums again' thread on the discuss list
> and therefore you must of known that there are at least three community
> members quite strongly opposed to at least one of those links and that
> the questi
Hi David,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:51:08 +0800
David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Nino, :-)
>
> I have not read your entire post above, but frankly I consider this kind of
> discussion unsuitable, off-topic, misrepresenting the facts and personally
> unpleasant. I had thought that the "atmosphere" on the
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 21:59 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi, :-)
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 21:07, drew wrote:
> > Hi David
> >
> > You should of read the entire 'forums again' thread on the discuss list
> > and therefore you must of known that there are at least three community
> > members quit
Hi,
Le Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:11:22 -0400,
drew a écrit :
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 21:59 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> > Hi, :-)
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 21:07, drew wrote:
> > > Hi David
> > >
> > > You should of read the entire 'forums again' thread on the
> > > discuss list and therefore
Hello everyone,
As you know we have a conference coming up in October in Paris :-)
We should start to prepare our website and the conference on an online
aspect. For the moment we have this set of simple pages:
http://conference.libreoffice.org/
We need to work on two specific items:
- posting t
Hi, :-)
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 23:43, Charles-H. Schulz
wrote:
>> IMO, and that is all it is at this point, the link to
>> LibreOfficeForum.org for sure should come down and please come with me
>> to the discuss list and let us see what happens, if you would.
>>
> +1 to all the above, Drew.
OK,
Hi, :-)
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 23:59, Charles-H. Schulz
wrote:
> Anyone willing to help?
Feel free to count me in, Charles.
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive:
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 23:40 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi, :-)
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 23:43, Charles-H. Schulz
> wrote:
> >> IMO, and that is all it is at this point, the link to
> >> LibreOfficeForum.org for sure should come down and please come with me
> >> to the discuss list and let us
Drew,
>
> ps - oh yeah the second thing, any past statements not withstanding -
> I ought to give the MC the chance to turn me down..
>
I think you ought, they won't miss the opportunity to vet you :-)
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe i
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 18:18 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> Drew,
>
> >
> > ps - oh yeah the second thing, any past statements not withstanding -
> > I ought to give the MC the chance to turn me down..
> >
>
> I think you ought, they won't miss the opportunity to vet you :-)
God don;t I know
Hi David,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 15:51, David Nelson wrote:
> I have not read your entire post above, but frankly I consider this
> kind of discussion unsuitable, off-topic, misrepresenting the facts
> and personally unpleasant.
Well - it was just an attempt.
Personally, I was offended by
Hi Klaus:
Le 2011-04-26 07:43, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol a écrit :
Maybe it is this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/website@libreoffice.org/msg00915.html
Without Rich Editor your script works quite well:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:K-j/it
Cheers
Marc
Cheers
Actual
Hi Paulo
Le 2011-04-26 07:52, Paulo de Souza Lima a écrit :
Yes, I have seen that thread, but sometimes it's necessary to paste some
stuff into the page.
That's why I preffer to use script text than rich text format ;-) It's
needed to learn some basic commands, but none too much difficult.
I
Hi Nino,
Just so history does not get twisted, the true facts are that I had
originally added a link to the LibreOffice Alfresco platform in the
LibreOffice wiki top menu, alongside the links to other LibO/TDF
resources. Klaus-Jürgen Weghorn arbitrarily removed it. I put it back
again.
As regards
Hi David,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 19:50, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Nino,
>
> Just so history does not get twisted, the true facts are that I had
> originally added a link to the LibreOffice Alfresco platform in the
> LibreOffice wiki top menu, alongside the links to other LibO/TDF
> resources. Kla
Hi David, all!
Also some comments from my side, since I hope it might improve how we
talk to each other.
Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 01:50 +0800 schrieb David Nelson:
> Hi Nino,
>
> Just so history does not get twisted, the true facts are that I had
> originally added a link to the LibreOffice
Hi Nino, all,
it is not about the Litmus link but about the Alfresco link.
The Litmus link wont be the problem. It isn't of any interests by David.
Let me describe it:
David made a link to Alfresco on the top menu. He doesn't tell us why he
do so. He has no need do to so.
I asked him why and he
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 21:19 +0200, ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote:
> Hi Nino, all,
> it is not about the Litmus link but about the Alfresco link.
Hi K-J,
Ok - let's stick to the alfresco link.
> The Litmus link wont be the problem. It isn't of any interests by David.
> Let me describe it:
> David
Hi!
Am 26.04.2011 08:01, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:
Hi Sophie, Am 26.04.2011 06:09, schrieb Sophie Gautier:
Hi all,
Could you please remove the link to The Litmus QA tool until it is
ready to use? We have still a lot of work on it before people can
freely use it.
I commented it out now
Hi Klaus-Jürgen,
On 26/04/2011 09:01, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote:
Hi Sophie,
Am 26.04.2011 06:09, schrieb Sophie Gautier:
Hi all,
Could you please remove the link to The Litmus QA tool until it is ready
to use? We have still a lot of work on it before people can freely use
it.
It will only a
Hi David, all,
after re-rereading some of the messages, I now realize my own
misunderstanding: I've mixed up Alfresco and Litmus issues as the
Alfresco thing was talked about in the Litmus thread. My fault, sorry
for that.
So my communication analysis (which you have not read anyways) is
the
Hi K-J,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 21:19, ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote:
> it is not about the Litmus link but about the Alfresco link.
Ok, sorry. But then it would be better to keep the discussion on the
Alfresco thread.
I did not read the Alfresco thread at all as I did not have the time to
Hi *,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:48 PM, drew wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 23:40 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 23:43, Charles-H. Schulz
>> wrote:
>
> Also, if no one minds I would like to start a new thread on the discuss
> list for this, the current one is a bit long in
Hi Drew,
thanks for your explanations.
Am 26.04.2011 21:49, schrieb drew:
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 21:19 +0200, ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote:
Hi Nino, all,
it is not about the Litmus link but about the Alfresco link.
Hi K-J,
Ok - let's stick to the alfresco link.
The Litmus link wont be the
45 matches
Mail list logo