This is not surprising, when the Foundation and all the external
consultants advising it on this exercise are all US-based.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Leinonen Teemu
wrote:
> Hej,
>
> Gerard made some very important points. My observation (not an opinion :-)
> is also that the initiatives
Hej,
Gerard made some very important points. My observation (not an opinion :-) is
also that the initiatives in, and with a focus on, global south are under
served. They are more difficult to do, because of various reasons, but this
should not be a reason not to do them. It is also true that la
Hoi,
The one serious flaw of the current practice is that English Wikipedia
receives more attention than it deserves based on its merits[1]. This bias
can be found in any and all areas. There is for instance a huge educational
effort going on for English and there is no strategy known, developed,
t
This Board was fomed in 2007 to advise the Wikimedia Foundation, and was
required to be renewed annually. No resolution was made to do so in 2015,
so by the beginning of 2016 it had lapsed. This status is reflected at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Advisory_Board but the corresponding page
at h
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Strainu wrote:
> 2017-06-23 23:48 GMT+03:00 Pine W :
> > Could you elaborate on the benefits of this timetable change for people
> who
> > are not involved with affiliates?
>
>
>
> Starting from this assumption, and considering the fact that even the
> most activ
2017-06-23 23:48 GMT+03:00 Pine W :
> Could you elaborate on the benefits of this timetable change for people who
> are not involved with affiliates?
Hi Pine,
I would like to give my view on this since extending the deadlines was
the main feedback that I gave after the last phase of the
consultat