[xmail] Re: 1.25 just started to seg fault

On Tue, 20 May 2008, fred wrote: > Thanks for replying. > > Francis, absolutely nothing changed since the server started to core dump, I > can assure you. Friday morning, when I got to work XMAIL wasn't accepting > emails anymore because it's partition was full, it had 105GB left Thursday > nigh

[xmail] Re: 1.26-pre01

On Wed, 14 May 2008, Hal Dell wrote: > > Hal wrote --- > > > Is the "NoAuth" option is designed to fix the Postini lockdown issue? > > Thefore is the syntax: "SmtpConfig-," "NoAuth". > > And this option looks at IPPROP for the whitelist? > > Sorry. Jumped the gun here. Yes, this should solve m

[xmail] Re: 1.26-pre01

On Tue, 13 May 2008, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > I put out a pre01 version of 1.26: > > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.26-pre01.tar.gz > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.26-pre01.win32bin.zip > > > Changes: > > - Fixed a bug that allowed non-RFC

[xmail] 1.26-pre01

I put out a pre01 version of 1.26: http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.26-pre01.tar.gz http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.26-pre01.win32bin.zip Changes: - Fixed a bug that allowed non-RFC characters inside domain names. - Fixed OSX Leopard build error. - Added "timeo" option to flags executio

[xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail

On Fri, 2 May 2008, David Lord wrote: > On 2 May 2008 at 10:27, Hal Dell wrote: > > > Hello... > > > > For those of you who don't know Postini -- the company was founded in 1999 > > in California as a eMail Communication Security and Compliance company. By > > May 2004 it was relaying 1.4B eMai

[xmail] Re: Aliases.tab

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Jayson Keidel wrote: > Under Exim on a Debian server, I was able to create system-wide aliases > that would send an email to multiple accounts. > Example: help@ would be forwarded both to me & the other > tech support guy working with that server. > > In Xmail's aliases.tab

[xmail] Re: Compiling XMail 1.25 fails on OSX Leopard

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: > GREAT! ;-) > > Can you give a non-C guru some hint how to apply the diff? $ cd XMAILSROUCE $ patch -p1 < PATCHFILE - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For ge

[xmail] Re: Compiling XMail 1.25 fails on OSX Leopard

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: > Compiling fails with > > $ OSTYPE=Darwin make -f Makefile.bsd > gcc -o bin/MkMachDep MkMachDep.o -lssl -lcrypto -lkvm -lpthread > ld: library not found for -lkvm > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [bin/MkMachDep] Error 1 > > OpenSSL

[xmail] Re: Virtual memory used by xmail

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, arni wrote: > In the search for an easy to install lightweight mailserver, I found > xmailserver and instantly installed it on my machine without any problems. > > The only problem I have with it is its imense virtual memory usage. > While its only using about 1.5Mb real ra

[xmail] Re: multiple smtprelay servers for custdomains and 5xx er rors

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Oliver Stöneberg wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > > > > > Seems there was some post about this. > > > > > > The BIG figure is when the final domain have multiple mx servers. > > > Suppose the final domain have two mx and one is misconfigured and return

[xmail] Re: XMailServer 1.25 Memory Footprint

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Vinny Wadding wrote: > Absolutely... It seemed to make no difference if the filters were running o= > r not. I tried it both ways around. Results were the same when submittin= > g mails for that domain - the buffers/cache would immediately start increas= > ing where as the

[xmail] Re: XMailServer 1.25 Memory Footprint

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Vinny Wadding wrote: > Damn, I was hoping I had missed an option in server.tab. ;-) > > I only mentioned the memory usage above to clarify that I didn't look like = > it I was any leak in XMail itself. Obviously, this is a new server and at = > the moment only test traffic i

[xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Hal Dell wrote: > > Dear Clement Francis / Davide - > > > First at all xmail doc for smtp.ipprop.tab syntax says : > > "Address selection mask are formed by an IP address > > (network) plus the number of valid bits inside the network mask" > > [...snip...] > > "96.227.65.4

[xmail] Re: multiple smtprelay servers for custdomains and 5xx er rors

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Seems there was some post about this. > > The BIG figure is when the final domain have multiple mx servers. > Suppose the final domain have two mx and one is misconfigured and return > a 5xx. > So if xmail tries first the 'bad' server, what to do next

[xmail] Re: XMailServer 1.25 Memory Footprint

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Vinny Wadding wrote: > Hi guys, > I have just installed XMail 1.25 and am not seeing some odd behaviour > from it. It has taken me a while to try and track down what is > happening, but here it is from what I can find. > > The new server is put live and works extremely we

[xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Hal Dell wrote: > Dear Davide - > > As you can see from my previous messages I was unable to lockdown the xMail > Server based upon the config below. I did discover that SmtpConfig now seems > to work after an upgrade from 1.24 to 1.25. > > Now , when I attempt to connect d

[xmail] Re: Help with Gentoo install

On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, J. wrote: > #!/sbin/runscript > # Copyright 1999-2004 Gentoo Foundation > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 > # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/mail-mta/xmail/files/xmail.initd,v 1.3 > 2005/06/06 13:22:45 > ticho Exp $ > > depend() { >

[xmail] Re: XMail Installer

On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Shawn Anderson wrote: > Davide, > > You are correct, it has been too long since I updated it to support the new > features and functionality of XMail. So to that order, I have put together > a brand new version and am making a beta version available today. > > For anyone loo

[xmail] Re: Help with Gentoo install

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, J. wrote: > I've been trying get version 1.22 running after installing a gentoo ebuild > for it. I read in the > gentoo forums that running it in the /var/MailRoot environment is less > problematic with gentoo > than trying to do it under /chroot. > > So, I've set it up foll

[xmail] Re: Glst.conf and gmail

On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Dale Qualls wrote: > Okay, I got around the mkdep issue with: > touch /usr/local/bin/mkdep > chmod a+x /usr/local/mkdep > > I'm about ready to start testing glst but I'm concerned about the mnet > info for gmail. I found this on the web but I'm unable to find the mask > for

[xmail] Re: XMail Installer

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Tony Shiffer wrote: > I have a copy of this. Would you like me to email it? Probably that software is VERY old, and not working properly on newer XMail versions. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAI

[xmail] Re: glst compile question

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Dale Qualls wrote: > Davide (or anyone) > > I'm trying to compile the glst executables and keep getting this: > > vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26 # vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26 # make -f > Makefile.unx > -bash: vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26: No such file or directory > mkdep -f .depe

[xmail] Re: hotmail delivery problems

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, max toro q wrote: > Davide, > I totally agree that Hotmail drops the messages, but I don't have that > problem when I use Postfix. Can you think of a reason for that? The likely have some broken script/filter on their side. Hard to say. I send emails to Hotfail accounts w/out

[xmail] Re: hotmail delivery problems

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, max toro q wrote: > I don't think it's a SPF issue. I have another server with Postfix > running, and all messages that I send to Hotnail through that server > are delivered. But with Xmail messages get lost almost always. Lost? I doubt. Dropped by Hotmail, likely. - David

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD 7 and lc_r

On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote: > OK - I found a small amount of info that seems to indicate that the > correct flag is simply -pthread without -lc_r, and this is also true for > FreeBSD 6, although the only problem I ran into with FreeBSD 6 was a > show stopping 64 bit compile issue.

[xmail] Re: Header 'Received :' question/suggestion

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Hello Davide and list > > Here is a sample xmail generated 'Received :' header : > > Received: from some_sender_name ([aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd]:p) > (not important) > > What is exactly the 'some_sender_name' actual value ? > - The value of th

[xmail] Re: eventlog error

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Hello > > Filter error -5 means 'Timeout' > > So your script take too long to complete. > Verify manually your filter to see if : > - it work > - it doesn't wait for anything > - evaluate it's maximum time execution > > But at this time, you can't se

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: > I see - but it would be helpful to ignore and move th the next server > in the list in some situations. That's a rather odd behaviour. A 5xx means "NO, the operation will never succeed". If you put a server that gives a 5xx in front of another one

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: > I tested it with smtp.wanadoo.fr which gives a "Relay denied" and a > working 2nd server. The mail was never forwarded to #2. "Relay denied" is a permanent failure (5xx). XMail never retries upon that code. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this l

[xmail] Re: -ERR Invalid Syntax on PASS command (POP)

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Rob Arends wrote: > I believe that, at startup, if xmail does not find ALL the folders it > requires, then it should do one of two things. > > 1. create the missing folders > Or > 2. terminate after logging to the log_files/ screen/ event_log, depending on > platform and or d

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: > When a server is down, it does not instantly pick the next one in the list. Said who? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > it is possible to configure a list of forwarding SMTPs in smtpfwd.tab: > > "*"[TAB]"server1;server2;..." > > would be nice to have XMail to select e.g. server2 when server1 gives a > timeout or some other error. And what's wrong with the

[xmail] Re: Help with Postini

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Hal Dell wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Hal Dell wrote: > > > Hello.. All... I have a shared xMail eMail Server with several dozen > domains... > > > > A couple of the domains filter the eMail thru postini first... Thus we > get... > > > > Postini MTA In ---> SPAM Engine -

[xmail] Re: Help with Postini

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Hal Dell wrote: > > Hello.. All... I have a shared xMail eMail Server with several dozen > domains... > > A couple of the domains filter the eMail thru postini first... Thus we > get... > > Postini MTA In ---> SPAM Engine --> Postini SMTP Out --> My xMail MTA > > The ques

[xmail] Re: -ERR Invalid Syntax on PASS command (POP)

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Juan Carlos Muro wrote: > In /MailRoot/mailusers.tab: > > "mydomain.com" "xmailuser" "" 1 "xmailuser" "U" > "mydomain.com" "user1" "54575651" 2 "user1" "U" > =20 > I send a message from 'user1' to 'xmailuser', and seems to reac

[xmail] Re: How to start a mailing list?

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Vladimir Bibel wrote: > Hello, could somebody advice me? > > I am trying to start a mailing list on xmail server. > > I put this line into user.tab: > > "ListSender" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > I put mailing list users into mlusers.tab: > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "RW" > "[EMAIL

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote: > By the way, the trace does, and always has, produced the correct name > servers (dns1.buehlertech.net and dns2.buehlertech.net), it just > continues to trace after that result. Do they set the correct AUTHORITY bit in the answer? - Davide - To uns

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote: > > > yes there is TAB in fact 1.24 works fine. > > The fact that it works fine in 1.24 does not mean that there's a TAB. IP > parsing code changed in 1.25, and it there was

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote: > OK, just to add to my confusion, here is part of what is going on - this > server also provides the authoritative DNS for trikorausa.com (but not > local DNS queries or caching!). It does not provide any other services > for trikorausa.com (no email e

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote: > yes there is TAB in fact 1.24 works fine. The fact that it works fine in 1.24 does not mean that there's a TAB. IP parsing code changed in 1.25, and it there was a TAB in 1.24, that'd have been parsed fine anyway. XMail would have been fetched the f

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote: > smtprelay.tab: > > "10.0.0.0" "255.0.0.0" > "195.60.190.0" "255.255.255.0" > "195.60.191.0" "255.255.255.0" > "213.178.209.0" "255.255.255.0" > "147.123.125.0" "255.255.255.0" > "195.60.88.128" "255.255.255.128" > "213.136.179.21""255.2

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report ed earlier?)

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Hello Davide > > Recently I asked you how SMARTDnshost variable affected xmail internal > resolver, and you said that when using SmartDnsHost, xmail only ask for = > the > 'final' request (directly the mx lookup without trying first soa, ns, = >

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem reported earlier?)

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote: > Hi Davide - > > Everything works when I use SmartDNS host to point to the same resolver > as the server uses (a m0n0wall router). > If I do not use SmartDNS host, I get the error to domains that can > receive email from other sources. > > One example

[xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem reported earlier?)

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote: > Hi David - > I spoke too soon! The problem has reappeared, and consistently. So it was > NOT the line speed issue. > I will test SmartDNS settings and post the results. Presently > /etc/resolv.conf is set to the m0n0wall router on the LAN. Are you us

[xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Rosario Pingaro wrote: > we have a proble after upgrading to 1.25 > a linux sendmail daemon that relay to xmail get this error: > > The original message was received at Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:13:36 +0100 > from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] > >- The following addres

[xmail] Re: XMail control panel for Windows

On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Filip Supera wrote: > Bonjour Davide, > > R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 15/02/2008 =E0 20:58 : > > > I'm relaying here a message I received about a new XMail control panel for > > Windows: > > I downloaded the thing and launched it.=20 > > Here is the installer interface

[xmail] XMail control panel for Windows

I'm relaying here a message I received about a new XMail control panel for Windows: -- Hello, I have released a free windows hosting control panel that uses xmail as mail server. Would you please add that to your tools section. http://sourceforge.net/projects/windowshostingc Regards, Samir

[xmail] Re: External & Filter in mailproc.tab

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > isn't the External command meanwhile obsolete ? > IMHO there is nothing you can do with it which cannot be done with filters. Yes, you can do the same with filters. But, the code to support that is almost zero, and I cannot cut a feature lik

[xmail] Re: Problem with XMail on NetBSD-4

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, David Lord wrote: > On 30 Jan 2008, at 23:35, David Lord wrote: > > > Now back to NetBSD-4.0. > > I'm still unable to get local mail outgoing from NetBSD-4.0 > > whilst mail to public addresses seems be delivered ok. > > > > The dns server is same for NetBSD-3.1 as for NetBS

[xmail] Re: How works XMail SmartDNSHost setting

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Hello Davide > > When using SmartDNSHost setting in xmail server.tab file, does xmail use the > same internal resolving algo (ask for the domain soa, then ns servers, ..., > when mx records, ...), or does it make directly (and only) the final query >

[xmail] Re: Problem with XMail on NetBSD-4

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > I've still to try an earlier version of xmail on NetBSD-4.0 and also > > try again with ipv6 enabled. > > I think XMail is getting a ERR_DNS_NXDOMAIN (NXDOMAIN) from your DNS > server. When that's happening, XMail do

[xmail] Re: Problem with XMail on NetBSD-4

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, David Lord wrote: > On 20 Jan 2008, at 12:34, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > Give me a summary :) Should I look into it or not? > > > > Seems way hostnames are checked is different between NetBSD-4.0 > (xmail-1.25-pre16) and NetBSD-3.1 (xmail

[xmail] Re: SOLVED: Re: XMail 1.25 fails to build on RedHat Enterprise Server

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: > Gotit! Must have been my fault due to some additional linebreak. The > correct modification in the makefile is: > > CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -I. -I/usr/kerberos/include -D__UNIX__ -D__LINUX__ > -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DHAS_S > > ... written in

[xmail] Re: XMail 1.25 fails to build on RedHat Enterprise Server

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to build XMail on this machine: > > Linux version 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > (gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Lin > ux 3.2.3-47)) #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 23:35:44 EST 2005 > > ... but the build process stops with > >

[xmail] Re: Problem with XMail on NetBSD-4

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, David Lord wrote: > On 20 Jan 2008, at 2:43, David Lord wrote: > > > > > > > > > I've just been setting up a new server running NetBSD-4 and copied my > > > existing 1.25-pre25 NetBSD 3.1 directory and binaries. > > > > > > 'telnet localhost 25' > > > > > > Allows me to c

[xmail] Re: new Twist on POP3 Tail Issue?

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Hal Dell wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Davide Libenzi > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 3:30 PM > To: xmail@xmailserver.org > Subject: [xmail] Re: new Twist on POP

[xmail] Re: new Twist on POP3 Tail Issue?

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Hal Dell wrote: > Hello all... > Some time ago, in July of 2006, Davide wrote the xbmf post-data filter to > filter out eMail messages with the POP3 Tail Issue plus other related > issues. One place you can see Davide's posting about this is: >

[xmail] Re: Maximum DNS quesry depth exceeded

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote: > Bonjour Davide, > > R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 10/01/2008 =E0 20:04 : > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig paruvendu.com mx +trace > > > ; <<>> DiG 9.4.2 <<>> paruvendu.com mx +trace > > ;; global options: printcmd > > .. 118237 I

[xmail] Re: xspamc 0.4.4 on 1.25

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote: > On Wednesday 09 January 2008 20:03, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote: > > > On Monday 07 January 2008 20:05, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote: > > &g

[xmail] Re: xmailserver.org down

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Radu Spineanu wrote: > Hi > > It seems just as I was going to brink back online the Romanian mirror or > xmailserver.org the website went down. > > Any ideas when it will be fixed? It's fixed now. Somehow, sometimes, logrotate's `thttpd restart` fail to bring up thttpd.

[xmail] Re: Maximum DNS quesry depth exceeded

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote: > Hello, > > One one of two machines running XMAil, I have the following error. On > the other machine everything is OK. Same version of XMail (1.25). Any > clue ? Thanks ! > > [<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[Recipient > domain "paruvendu

[xmail] Re: xspamc 0.4.4 on 1.25

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote: > On Monday 07 January 2008 20:05, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > After upgrading from 1.24, xspamc 0.4.4 (unix) with spamd 3.1.0 on > > > Bluewhite 64 s

[xmail] Re: 1.25 is out

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote: > Davide Libenzi : > > > > > I will setup www.fr.xmailserver.org as CNAME of , where is the > > host name that you will give me. Such host name must have a virtual server > > that will accept requests for www.fr

[xmail] Re: xspamc 0.4.4 on 1.25

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote: > Hello, > > After upgrading from 1.24, xspamc 0.4.4 (unix) with spamd 3.1.0 on Bluewhite > 64 simply refuses to work. As command line is not supported in xspamc, no > debug is available. No message reaches spamd, no entry in XMail or xspamc > logs, the e

[xmail] Re: 1.25 is out

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote: > Bonjour Davide, > > R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 07/01/2008 =E0 00:03 : > > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote: > > >> Bonjour Davide, > >>=20 > >> >> Maybe Mihai will sort this out. All other mirrors but Italy, > >> >> Netherland and Eye-Catche

[xmail] Re: 1.25 is out

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Ivo Smits wrote: > Davice, > > How about (read-only) rsync? I think rsync is even better than HTTP HEAD. The site is not big, so I don't need that extra optimization. Plus, I consume only about 40GB of the monthly 200GB I have ;) > I can host (another) mirror in The Nethe

[xmail] Re: 1.25 is out

On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote: > Bonjour Davide, > > >> Maybe Mihai will sort this out. All other mirrors but Italy, > >> Netherland and Eye-Catcher are showing 1.25. Italy is still showing > >> 1.22. May be you have to speak Italian to the webmaster. Should not be > >> a big problem :-)

[xmail] Re: Windows compatible mail pickup support in XMail

On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Michal A. Valasek wrote: > Hello, > > I have feature request: let local mailer in Xmail support Windows Mail > Pickup Service format, in addition to its own. > > Why? It seems that built-in SMTP server in Windows is going to be > deprecated. In Windows Server 2008 it must be

[xmail] Re: 1.25 is out

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote: > Bonjour Davide, > > >> Slovenia is the best, Italy the worst and Romania seems to have > >> server problems ! > > > I need to remove Romania. The mirror is no more available AFAICT. > > Maybe Mihai will sort this out. All other mirrors but Italy, > Neth

[xmail] Re: 1.25 is out

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2008 23:55, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote: > > > On Friday 04 January 2008 20:28, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > > Slovenia is the best, Italy the worst and Roman

[xmail] Re: 1.25 is out

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Mihai Dobre wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2008 20:28, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > Slovenia is the best, Italy the worst and Romania seems to have > > > server problems ! > > > > I need to remove Romania. The mirror is no more ava

[xmail] Re: XMail 1.25 Bug

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Mike Harrington wrote: > I've located a bug in 1.25... I'm not sure how far-reaching it is yet. I > can only assume it is related to the Fixed strengthened RFC address parsing. > The admin protocol allows for bad domain names to be passed in, as shown in > the example below

[xmail] Re: 1.25 is out

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Filip Supera wrote: > Bonjour Davide, > > R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 04/01/2008 =E0 00:45 : > > > No changes since 1.25-pre25: > > > http://www.xmailserver.org/ChangeLog.html#jan_3__2008_v_1_25 > > > http://www.xmailserver.org/ > > Thanks Davide and Happy new year ! >

[xmail] 1.25 is out

No changes since 1.25-pre25: http://www.xmailserver.org/ChangeLog.html#jan_3__2008_v_1_25 http://www.xmailserver.org/ - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body o

[xmail] Re: Happy new year !

On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Happy new year to all xmail users, and especialy to Davide. > > Hope 2008 will be the year of xmail 2.0 ;) Happy new year! Let's start with making 1.25 before :) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the b

[xmail] Re: mprc subfolders being trashed by mailproc.tab

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Harald Schneider wrote: > Hi Davide, > a forum user discovered that the spool's mprc folders are being trashed > with huge amount of files, when a user's mailproc.tab contains only a > single "mailbox" line. Would be nice if you could have a look on it. I'll need some more in

[xmail] Re: SMTP Forward

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: > These users are (at this moment) using our smtp server to send their > messages. But, for some strange reason that we could not solve until now, > even with all kind of smtp authentication marked in their MUA the X-Auth > field doesn´t arrives her

[xmail] Re: SMTP Forward

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: > Hi all, > > Due some persistent problems with Outlook and Outlook Express with SMTP > Authentication, we are instructing some companies that uses our services to > install XMail Server internally. > But in Brazil many adsl connections uses dynamic

[xmail] Re: Strange kernel error-messages.

On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Tjeerd Makel wrote: > > Hi all, > > Every now and then, my system echoes strange error messages which are > also logged in '/var/log/messages'. They look like this : > > Oct 7 17:19:25 server1 XMail[551]: Invalid command "WAIT" in file > "/storage/MailRoot/spool/9/12/cust/1

[xmail] Re: Problems with attachments after server upgrade

On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Stig Østvang wrote: > Hi, Davide. > > Yes, I tried to save it to disk, and it was the same size as Yahoo claimed= > (145kb, original was 105kb). I have no idea. Seems ackwardly strange. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the b

[xmail] Re: Problems with attachments after server upgrade

On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Stig Østvang wrote: > Something else I just found out. When I click on Preview for the attachment > in Yahoo, it shows properly, but it's still too large... File type is > application/octet-stream. Hmm, did you try to save it on disk and see the on-disk size? I give it for g

[xmail] Re: ErrCode -40 vs -215

On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote: > Hi all, > > since installing 1.25 I notice that when a message gets frozen > immediately because of a DNS problem there are two kinds of slog messages. > > One is familiar since 1.23 > > ErrCode = -215 > ErrString = DNS name not exist > Recipien

[xmail] Re: filter problem when running in daemon mode

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Matic wrote: > Damn, I thought you were a wizard! :( > Seriously, i thought it might be some specific system code or whatever. The execution was successful from a system POV (see the "0" before the "250"). But your "whatever" was run in your filter, returned 250. - Davi

[xmail] Re: filter problem when running in daemon mode

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Matic wrote: > Hi, > > I have moved the script from mailproc.tab to filters.in.tab to se what > would be in the filterslog > and this is it: > > .. "in" "" "0" "250" "path to the executabale" > > what could cause the 250 exit code? You ask me?!? That's the

[xmail] Re: long delay before xmail header

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Matic wrote: > I meant etc/hosts file > 10.0.0.11 srv6 > . > the strangest thing is that if I exec telnet 10.0.2.2 25 I get > Connected.. > Escape chara. > > and no xmail header > > > but if I press enter 2 times I immediately get the xmail header and 2 times > 5

[xmail] Re: filter problem when running in daemon mode

On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Matic wrote: > hi > > i have just moved one xmail server from win to linux and everything > seems to work fine. I just have one glitch with one of the filters in > mailproc > > in mailproc.tab i have > "mailbox" > "external" "path to bash script" "@@FILE" (real TABs)

[xmail] Re: long delay before xmail header

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Matic wrote: > yes, it is in private range behind NAT > > Davide Libenzi pravi: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Matic wrote: if I connect from > anyother computer on the network or even from outside of network the header > comes up immediately so I think this

[xmail] Re: long delay before xmail header

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Matic wrote: > if I connect from any other computer on the network or even from outside of > network the header comes up immediately so I think this is IP->hostname > resolution, but htne again i have a record for this IP in xmail hosts file. > any suggestion how could I test

[xmail] Re: long delay before xmail header

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Matic wrote: > Hi, > I am experiencing long delay before initial header and only from one > machine. All other machines with same netmask and connected to same > switch get the xmail response immediately. What could be the cause for > such behavior? It is a DNS slowdown. E

[xmail] Re: 2-4 hour delay on relays....

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, David Lord wrote: > I should have added that defaults for retries seem very conservative > and much safer for a production server than my values that ramp up > the period between reduced number of retries much more agressively. > > Davide, please correct me if I've calculat

[xmail] Re: 2-4 hour delay on relays....

On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, David Lord wrote: > Only a home server here, k6-400, NetBSD 3.1, total memory = 127 MB, > avail memory = 119 MB. I used to send a batch of 12 emails from a > remote account as test of spamassassin and fprot, 6 x connections > each to 2 accounts. Occasionally all would slowl

[xmail] Re: 2-4 hour delay on relays....

On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote: > Same problem thing this morning. Sent a message, waited 30 minutes and > it's still sitting in the queue, no SLOG file, message was sitting in > the spool just fine. Restart XMail and the message flies on through. > Is there anything strange with my c

[xmail] Re: Am I still subscribed?

On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Francesco Vertova wrote: > Mailbox full last night ... return -ENOPARSE; :) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message t

[xmail] Re: 2-4 hour delay on relays....

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote: > Strange. I flushed the queue, using Haralds manager, and it shot the > message right through. Ok, forget the tools. Let's go to the file system. Stop XMail and clean the spool `find spool/ -type f | xargs rm -f` (if spossible - this will nuke possible

[xmail] Re: bug fix for xmail crash (core dump) when build in Win32 debug mode

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Oliver Stöneberg wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote: > > > > > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > I think this (and many of the patches you sent) it is just *your* > > > > problems > > > >

[xmail] Re: 2-4 hour delay on relays....

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote: > Hello all, I've got a bit of a head scratcher here. > > I have a couple of XMail boxes setup to do relaying (no filtering of any > kind) as backup MX servers and I've never really paid much attention but > it appears that they relay received messages ab

[xmail] Re: bug fix for xmail crash (core dump) when build in Win32 debug mode

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > I think this (and many of the patches you sent) it is just *your* problems > > with a broken compiler. The Standard define non-local non-initialized > > object to be pre-initialized with zero. &

[xmail] Re: bug fix for xmail crash (core dump) when build in Win32 debug mode

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Fabian Cenedese wrote: > > >I think this (and many of the patches you sent) it is just *your* problems > >with a broken compiler. The Standard define non-local non-initialized > >object to be pre-initialized with zero. > > Where is this standard written? I don't know of ne

[xmail] Re: bug fix for xmail crash (core dump) when build in Win32 debug mode

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote: > Situation: > > - Win32 [release or] debug build (yep, I use MSVC2005 project files, NOT > the makefile, but that does not make any real difference here) > - link to the DLL version of the OpenSSL library (0.9.9 tested, will > VERY probably happe

[xmail] Re: fix for xmail command line handling of -SI ip[:port], etc. OPTIONAL [:port] spec handling

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt wrote: > If you use -SI (-PI / -XI / -FI / -CI / -WI ) with the > optional [:port] section included to specify a non-standard port for the > interface address(es), you're SOL as the code calls the appropriate > routine but does not extract the decoded

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >