[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 contact groups manipulation
Hello, Have you solved your problem 'cause I'm trying to do the same thing. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 -Map not showing up
You need a map key in your layout to use. Follow the instructions at the site and obtain the map api key. http://code.google.com/android/add-ons/google-apis/mapkey.html And in in your layout xml file in the place you have these lines add the map api key in the android:apikey place. com.google.android.maps.mapview android:id=@+id/mapview android:visibility=visible android:clickable=true android:apiKey=Add your map api key here android:layout_width=fill_parent android:layout_height=fill_parent / -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 battery level
Take a look at http://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/BatteryManager.html#EXTRA_VOLTAGE. Mihai Fonoage On Feb 15, 7:49 am, Maxood maqs...@salsoft.net wrote: Hi Mark! I want to display Batter level stats in my app as shown in the following link: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/app-genie/id352781306?mt=8 Wonder how can i access batter voltage/power information at runtime? On Dec 23 2009, 5:50 pm, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote: Motalen wrote: Is this to say that the Droid has the capability to report higher precision values given the nature of the hardware BUT there is no way to access it? Here is my interpretation: -- Precision refers to the fineness of detail. Many Android devices report at 1% precision, but the DROID reports at 10% precision. -- Accuracy refers to how well the reported values reflect reality. If I am mistaken, which I hope I am, how would we go about accessing the finer granularity that is needed when developing batteryapplications on the Droid? As far as I know, you can't. As Ms. Hackborn said, [10%] is just the precision the Droidbatteryreports. I have no problem getting single digit precision with other handsets only the Droid produces the strange '10's increments' only. That's the way Motorola elected to implement thebatterylevel information. The SDK does not mandate a minimum level of precision, so device manufacturers can report 1%, 10%, 3.14%, or whatever floats their boats. Applications (particularly paid ones) should not be relying upon some minimum level of precision, just as they should not be relying on certain LED colors or the availability of a physical CAMERA button. If you have more detailed questions on Motorola devices, I recommend asking Motorola the questions, since they have developer support boards: http://developer.motorola.com -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://twitter.com/commonsguy Android Development Wiki:http://wiki.andmob.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 battery level
Hi Mark! I want to display Batter level stats in my app as shown in the following link: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/app-genie/id352781306?mt=8 Wonder how can i access batter voltage/power information at runtime? On Dec 23 2009, 5:50 pm, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote: Motalen wrote: Is this to say that the Droid has the capability to report higher precision values given the nature of the hardware BUT there is no way to access it? Here is my interpretation: -- Precision refers to the fineness of detail. Many Android devices report at 1% precision, but the DROID reports at 10% precision. -- Accuracy refers to how well the reported values reflect reality. If I am mistaken, which I hope I am, how would we go about accessing the finer granularity that is needed when developing batteryapplications on the Droid? As far as I know, you can't. As Ms. Hackborn said, [10%] is just the precision the Droidbatteryreports. I have no problem getting single digit precision with other handsets only the Droid produces the strange '10's increments' only. That's the way Motorola elected to implement thebatterylevel information. The SDK does not mandate a minimum level of precision, so device manufacturers can report 1%, 10%, 3.14%, or whatever floats their boats. Applications (particularly paid ones) should not be relying upon some minimum level of precision, just as they should not be relying on certain LED colors or the availability of a physical CAMERA button. If you have more detailed questions on Motorola devices, I recommend asking Motorola the questions, since they have developer support boards: http://developer.motorola.com -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://twitter.com/commonsguy Android Development Wiki:http://wiki.andmob.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Google Maps Navigation and app use of turn-by-turn directions?
I would like to know if you could figure out a solution for this problem On Nov 14 2009, 5:10 pm, mobiledude akjer...@verizon.net wrote: While I don't have an answer to this question, I would like to concur with the sentiment in the hopes that this thread would get more attention. I am currently working on developing a location based service application and would like to use GoogleMapsNavigationas I don't want to get involved in thenavigationaspect of development. Although an API would be ideal, I was thinking one possible way to do this may be through a Content Provider (for example the Contacts database). If GoogleMapsuses a Content Provider that an application could get permission to access, then maybe the Content Provider can be used to supply a destination address for instance. Just a thought. Maybe someone out there may have some more insight into if or how one can interface with GoogleMapsNavigation. Thanks. On Oct 29, 1:19 pm, blindfold seeingwithso...@gmail.com wrote: Is anything known about how an app may tap turn-by-turn directions generated by Android 2.0's Google MapsNavigation? Until now we were prohibited by the GoogleMapsToS to offer turn-by-turn directions in our apps. Clearly it would be attractive to integrate some of that functionality in other mobile applications, or to be able to exert some level of control over Google MapsNavigationfrom one's app. In other words, are there any supplementary APIs for use with Google MapsNavigation? Or does Google MapsNavigationrun as a Service such that at least one need not switch between applications to still get spoken turn-by-turn directions even while one's app Activity is running in the foreground? See also the discussion in the TTS-for-Android group athttp://groups.google.com/group/tts-for-android/browse_thread/thread/4... Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0: Why does my transparent background turn white while scrolling??
never mind, I found the answer: http://developer.android.com/resources/articles/listview-backgrounds.html On Jan 7, 10:08 am, Flying Coder av8r.st...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm using a ListView with a transparent background. It works fine in Android 1.5 1.6, but in Android 2.0 and later, the ListView background turns white while scrolling. I want it to stay transparent, just like in 1.5 1.6. Does anyone know what's going on, or better yet, how I can get this working correctly? Thanks a bunch! Steve -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 battery level
Dianne, Is this to say that the Droid has the capability to report higher precision values given the nature of the hardware BUT there is no way to access it? If I am mistaken, which I hope I am, how would we go about accessing the finer granularity that is needed when developing battery applications on the Droid? I have no problem getting single digit precision with other handsets only the Droid produces the strange '10's increments' only. Much appreciated, Sean On Nov 10, 3:54 pm, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote: That is just the precision the Droid battery reports. Note that the Droid's battery measurement is actually much more accurate than the G1 or myTouch. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Scott sag5...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know if this is an Android 2.0 or a Motorola Droid issue, but I noticed that the battery level only reports in increments of 10's. For example 70%, 60% etc. Any apps or widgets also can only see this as well. Is this a bug, what happened to the detailed stats? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comandroid-developers%2Bunsubs cr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 battery level
Motalen wrote: Is this to say that the Droid has the capability to report higher precision values given the nature of the hardware BUT there is no way to access it? Here is my interpretation: -- Precision refers to the fineness of detail. Many Android devices report at 1% precision, but the DROID reports at 10% precision. -- Accuracy refers to how well the reported values reflect reality. If I am mistaken, which I hope I am, how would we go about accessing the finer granularity that is needed when developing battery applications on the Droid? As far as I know, you can't. As Ms. Hackborn said, [10%] is just the precision the Droid battery reports. I have no problem getting single digit precision with other handsets only the Droid produces the strange '10's increments' only. That's the way Motorola elected to implement the battery level information. The SDK does not mandate a minimum level of precision, so device manufacturers can report 1%, 10%, 3.14%, or whatever floats their boats. Applications (particularly paid ones) should not be relying upon some minimum level of precision, just as they should not be relying on certain LED colors or the availability of a physical CAMERA button. If you have more detailed questions on Motorola devices, I recommend asking Motorola the questions, since they have developer support boards: http://developer.motorola.com -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com | http://twitter.com/commonsguy Android Development Wiki: http://wiki.andmob.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Contacts FAQ?
Hi Rachel, This is a very informative and helpful blag. I really helped me in with questions I had about 2.0 API changes for Contacts. One thing I am still not able to resolve is How to get all the email address for a contact As you mentioned in your explaination that ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.CommonColumns class does not exist. so how did you made it to work? Thanks, Mo. On Nov 13, 11:22 pm, Rachel Blackman ceruleanspa...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 13, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Yao wrote: Another important thing is that are new contact APIs stable and public? Will they be changed in the next release? I've been seeing this is a private method many times. Contacts APIs were very stable before, but this time, new APIs is a big change without any document... Decent question. Okay, so the current list of Contacts Questions For a FAQ/Samples as far as I can tell is as follows. If anyone's interested in taking on one of them and writing up a sample to contribute, chime in? And as noted above, we probably should make sure whatever we figure out for any of these things is /guaranteed/ public, supported API, not private API that just ended up in the Javadocs or whatever. --- 1) How do I just get ALL the contacts under the 2.0 API? * I already posted an example of this, and I can readily turn something like that into a simple compilable project. 2) Given a contact, how do I get all the phone numbers? * Ditto above. 3) Given a contact, how do I get all the email addresses? * Ditto above, save that for some reason my copy of Eclipse claims that the ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.CommonColumns class does not exist. So my little sample from the other day doesn't compile for me, though replacing ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.CommonColumns.DATA with just data1 makes everything work fine. (Now I wonder if this is a problem in my install of the SDK, or if I misread the docs. Hrm.) 4) What sort of identifier should I represent a contact with in my local data, so I can later get their most-current data? * There was a thread about this on the mailing list, which someone could probably boil down into a sample 5) How do I set a contact photo? * There were SEVERAL threads on this on the mailing list, which could probably boil down into a sample. 6) How do I add a contact to the address book from within an app? * There's been at least one vague thread on this, which... maybe can be a sample? 7) How do I work with groups? (Create a group, delete a group, get or alter group membership.) * I don't think there's been a good answer to this. 8) How do I add custom data to a contact? * I don't think there's been a clear answer to this. 9) How do I /get/ the nifty status messages and the source for them (a'la 'Away for lunch' on 'Google Talk,' or 'eating a pie!' on 'Facebook'), so I can display them alongside a contact in my own app? (Alternatively, some ask how they can set the nifty status messages and have them appear in the QuickContact bar or in other apps.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 emulator (Droid skin) crawls
me four On 1 Des, 16:57, kanatacrude garnet.ulr...@gmail.com wrote: I have the same issue. Eclipse 3.4.2 with the 2.0 SDK,ADT0.9.4 . Android2.0 emulationslowas molasses, 1.6 is fine. Hmm. Guess not too many people have this problem given the lack of replies... garnet On Nov 12, 11:07 pm, Jay-andro jayan...@gmail.com wrote: Is it just me or is everyone experiencing excruciatinglyslowstartup time followed by extermely poor responsiveness on theAndroid2.0 emulator? I've got Eclipse Ganymede 3.4.1,AndroidSDK 5. MyAndroid 1.5 emulator launches in a flash and performs pretty close to the device itself. Whereas 2.0 moves in super-slow-mo. I'm using the Droid skin fromhttp://teavuihuang.com/android/ The hardware I'm running on is more than capable, albeit I admit I'm on Vista :-( The point is the old emulator flies (and all my other apps fly), and the new emulator crawls. Any ideas? Thanks Jay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
Yes Dmitri, this is exactly what I am doing -- I am not manually
inserting records into the contacts db like the test case does, but
there is definitely a contact with a mobile phone number
617939 (with real digits, not xs), and when I open a cursor on
the query:
Uri filterUri1 = Uri.withAppendedPath(Phones.CONTENT_FILTER_URL,
617939); // with real digits, not xs
I get back a valid cursor, but no rows (moveToFirst() returns false)
-- on 2.0 emulator only. On 1.6 emulator, it works fine.
// greg //
On Dec 4, 7:21 pm, Dmitri Plotnikov dplotni...@google.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
Take a look at the testPhonesFilterQuery unit test we have for
verifying the behavior in question:
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/packages/providers/Contacts...
Is what it's doing correct? Is it different from what you are doing?
Thank you,
- Dmitri
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:00 PM, ghassett greghass...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dmitri -- I am not sure that the old API is still functional. I am
using what I think is the standard way of getting a display name from
a phone number -- see the code below -- and it functions on a 1.6
emulator but on on a 2.0 emulator. Am I doing something wrong? Is
there an example somewhere of how to get a contact name from a phone
number that will function in 1.5, 1.6, and 2.0?
Here's the code -- it works when run in the 1.6 emulator, but not in
the 2.0 emulator (Cursor comes back non-null, but there are no records
so moveToFirst returns false):
public String getDisplayName (ContentResolver contentResolver)
{
String retval = mPhoneNumber;
Cursor cursor = contentResolver.query(
Uri.withAppendedPath
(Contacts.Phones.CONTENT_FILTER_URL,
Uri.encode(mPhoneNumber)),
new String[] { Contacts.Phones.DISPLAY_NAME
},
null, null, null);
if (cursor != nullcursor.moveToFirst())
{
retval = cursor.getString(0);
}
return retval;
}
// thanks // greg //
On Oct 30, 3:05 pm, Dmitri Plotnikov dplotni...@google.com wrote:
It's deprecated, not removed. The old API is still functional, but with
restrictions:
1. If your app was using something non-public, that part is likely to
break.
We tested a bunch of apps on the market against the legacy API - most
worked, but some did not. Those were the cases when the app was using some
knowledge of the undocumented underlying database structure.
2. Legacy API will only give you access to the primary account, i.e. the
first Google account you add to the phone.
- Dmitri
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM, nEx.Software
email.nex.softw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hold up... I'm confused. Are you saying that Contacts portion of the
SDK is deprecated? Whatever happened to stick to the SDK because
those are stable apis that won't break in future versions? Very
disappointing...
On Oct 30, 11:12 am, Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com wrote:
Could you post the exact Uri you're passing to query()? As the
javadoc describes, you need to append a filter string to the
CONTENT_FILTER_URI so it knows what to filter on.
Uri lookupUri = Uri.withAppendedPath(PhoneLookup.CONTENT_URI,
phoneNumber);
Also, you might be able to skip your second step, since you can
directly ask for the PhoneLookup.DISPLAY_NAME column in the
projection.
j
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:05 AM, agirardello
andrea.girarde...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I'm trying to adapt my application (Personalytics) for the brand new
Android 2.0, however I'm facing an issue while accessing contacts'
phone numbers...
What I need to do is to retrieve the name associated to a stored
contact based on his/her phone number. At present I'm doing this in
two steps:
1) from a phone number I get the corresponding ID of the stored
contact (if present)
2) I retrieve the contact's name based on that ID
I managed to use the correct CONTENT_URI for reading contacts by
using
reflection to be fully compatible with Android 2.0
(ContactsContract.Contacts.CONTENT_URI) and the previous versions
(People.CONTENT_URI).
Now I'm trying to do the same for Phones.CONTENT_URI (Android = 1.6)
and ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI (Android = 2.0)
which is needed by step 2) mentioned above. But as soon as I try to
get a contentResolver by using
ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI I get the following
exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown URL
content://com.android.contacts/phone_lookup
This looks really strange to me, since it should be correct (it is
part of the official API)! Moreover, I tried to look at the API
Re: [android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
Then it has to be an emulator issue, because the test passes fine on Droid. See if you can read the phone number using the plain Data.CONTENT_URI API. If you can, the issue is indeed with the lookup URI. On Dec 5, 2009 8:37 AM, ghassett greghass...@gmail.com wrote: Yes Dmitri, this is exactly what I am doing -- I am not manually inserting records into the contacts db like the test case does, but there is definitely a contact with a mobile phone number 617939 (with real digits, not xs), and when I open a cursor on the query: Uri filterUri1 = Uri.withAppendedPath(Phones.CONTENT_FILTER_URL, 617939); // with real digits, not xs I get back a valid cursor, but no rows (moveToFirst() returns false) -- on 2.0 emulator only. On 1.6 emulator, it works fine. // greg // On Dec 4, 7:21 pm, Dmitri Plotnikov dplotni...@google.com wrote: Hi Greg, Take a look at th... http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/packages/providers/Contacts... Is what it's doing correct? Is it different from what you are doing? Thank you, - Dmitri ... On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:00 PM, ghassett greghass...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dmitri -- I am not ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
Hi Greg,
Take a look at the testPhonesFilterQuery unit test we have for
verifying the behavior in question:
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/packages/providers/ContactsProvider.git;a=blob;f=tests/src/com/android/providers/contacts/LegacyContactsProviderTest.java;hb=HEAD
Is what it's doing correct? Is it different from what you are doing?
Thank you,
- Dmitri
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:00 PM, ghassett greghass...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dmitri -- I am not sure that the old API is still functional. I am
using what I think is the standard way of getting a display name from
a phone number -- see the code below -- and it functions on a 1.6
emulator but on on a 2.0 emulator. Am I doing something wrong? Is
there an example somewhere of how to get a contact name from a phone
number that will function in 1.5, 1.6, and 2.0?
Here's the code -- it works when run in the 1.6 emulator, but not in
the 2.0 emulator (Cursor comes back non-null, but there are no records
so moveToFirst returns false):
public String getDisplayName (ContentResolver contentResolver)
{
String retval = mPhoneNumber;
Cursor cursor = contentResolver.query(
Uri.withAppendedPath
(Contacts.Phones.CONTENT_FILTER_URL,
Uri.encode(mPhoneNumber)),
new String[] { Contacts.Phones.DISPLAY_NAME },
null, null, null);
if (cursor != null cursor.moveToFirst())
{
retval = cursor.getString(0);
}
return retval;
}
// thanks // greg //
On Oct 30, 3:05 pm, Dmitri Plotnikov dplotni...@google.com wrote:
It's deprecated, not removed. The old API is still functional, but with
restrictions:
1. If your app was using something non-public, that part is likely to break.
We tested a bunch of apps on the market against the legacy API - most
worked, but some did not. Those were the cases when the app was using some
knowledge of the undocumented underlying database structure.
2. Legacy API will only give you access to the primary account, i.e. the
first Google account you add to the phone.
- Dmitri
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM, nEx.Software email.nex.softw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hold up... I'm confused. Are you saying that Contacts portion of the
SDK is deprecated? Whatever happened to stick to the SDK because
those are stable apis that won't break in future versions? Very
disappointing...
On Oct 30, 11:12 am, Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com wrote:
Could you post the exact Uri you're passing to query()? As the
javadoc describes, you need to append a filter string to the
CONTENT_FILTER_URI so it knows what to filter on.
Uri lookupUri = Uri.withAppendedPath(PhoneLookup.CONTENT_URI,
phoneNumber);
Also, you might be able to skip your second step, since you can
directly ask for the PhoneLookup.DISPLAY_NAME column in the
projection.
j
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:05 AM, agirardello
andrea.girarde...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I'm trying to adapt my application (Personalytics) for the brand new
Android 2.0, however I'm facing an issue while accessing contacts'
phone numbers...
What I need to do is to retrieve the name associated to a stored
contact based on his/her phone number. At present I'm doing this in
two steps:
1) from a phone number I get the corresponding ID of the stored
contact (if present)
2) I retrieve the contact's name based on that ID
I managed to use the correct CONTENT_URI for reading contacts by using
reflection to be fully compatible with Android 2.0
(ContactsContract.Contacts.CONTENT_URI) and the previous versions
(People.CONTENT_URI).
Now I'm trying to do the same for Phones.CONTENT_URI (Android = 1.6)
and ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI (Android = 2.0)
which is needed by step 2) mentioned above. But as soon as I try to
get a contentResolver by using
ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI I get the following
exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown URL
content://com.android.contacts/phone_lookup
This looks really strange to me, since it should be correct (it is
part of the official API)! Moreover, I tried to look at the API
Demos project, in particular to the classes:
com.example.android.apis.view.List2
com.example.android.apis.view.List3
which are still using the deprecated People.CONTENT_URI and
Phones.CONTENT_URI and thus no data (i.e. contacts) is loaded (of
course I have sample contacts in the emulator).
- Do you have any suggestion to solve this problem?
- Or is there another approach I can use to get the name of a contact
based on one of his/her numbers? (This must work on all versions of
Android)
Thank you ;-)
Andrea
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 emulator (Droid skin) crawls
Me too. 2009/12/1 kanatacrude garnet.ulr...@gmail.com I have the same issue. Eclipse 3.4.2 with the 2.0 SDK, ADT 0.9.4 . Android 2.0 emulation slow as molasses, 1.6 is fine. Hmm. Guess not too many people have this problem given the lack of replies... garnet On Nov 12, 11:07 pm, Jay-andro jayan...@gmail.com wrote: Is it just me or is everyone experiencing excruciatingly slow startup time followed by extermely poor responsiveness on the Android 2.0 emulator? I've got Eclipse Ganymede 3.4.1, Android SDK 5. My Android 1.5 emulator launches in a flash and performs pretty close to the device itself. Whereas 2.0 moves in super-slow-mo. I'm using the Droid skin fromhttp://teavuihuang.com/android/ The hardware I'm running on is more than capable, albeit I admit I'm on Vista :-( The point is the old emulator flies (and all my other apps fly), and the new emulator crawls. Any ideas? Thanks Jay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comandroid-developers%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Review
I've been using Android since v1.0 and Dianne is right. I don't have v2.0 on my myTouch but there are options to turn on screen animations. Also, the dialer has always had big buttons... Do you USE an Android phone? Or have you just recently been using Android and feel you know enough to write an article? On Dec 1, 7:51 pm, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote: Um. they do themselves repeated injustice by presenting their technology on very weak hardware specifications What is Droid? The Vibrate on Keypress - where did we see this before? Its very similar to the HTC Hero. Actually it's been a feature of the standard platform IME since its first version. Android 2.0 does have some surprises up its sleeve: new widgets and new classes that give it that iPhone feeling: fade-in, fade out sexy-touch-and-feel. I don't think there were any new widget classes in 2.0, nor significant new app widgets (that go on the home screen). And the picture shown here is a little strange, since I don't think that api demo nor the controls in it changed significantly in 2.0 (there may have been some smallish tweaks to graphics as they were redone in high density). Also as far as animations -- the animations have always been a part of the platform since 1.0, but were turned off by default. 1.5 introduced a visible preference to turn them on, but left it off by default. 2.0 made this on by default, and added new animations involving the wallpaper since the wallpaper in 2.0 became a separate independent plane that applications could sit on top of. Finally, someone at Android figured out that increasing the button sizes for a phone dialer can only make the OS more user-friendly. This is really confusing since I think the buttons in 2.0 are actually a bit smaller, to allow space for the additional buttons on the bottom. :) The graphics did change, which makes them look a little larger horizontally, but the hit area is the same in that direction (and a little smaller vertically). -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 emulator (Droid skin) crawls
Me three. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 source group
This might be a bit crude, but what I usually do is this: 1. Search Google for: mediarecorder.java site:.kernel.org 2. Click on the first hit. 3. Find MediaRecorder.java on that page and click on the blob link next to it. 4. Click on HEAD. I've always found the source code I wanted this way. YMMV. Cheers //Johan On 30 Nov, 17:49, me michaeltcon...@gmail.com wrote: Would someone be kind enough to zipup the android 2.0 source code related to the MediaRecorder class and email it to me? My code works fine in the emulator but MediaRecorder.Start() is failing on the droid. There error message only says could not start. Thanks michaelto...@yahoo.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 emulator (Droid skin) crawls
I have the same issue. Eclipse 3.4.2 with the 2.0 SDK, ADT 0.9.4 . Android 2.0 emulation slow as molasses, 1.6 is fine. Hmm. Guess not too many people have this problem given the lack of replies... garnet On Nov 12, 11:07 pm, Jay-andro jayan...@gmail.com wrote: Is it just me or is everyone experiencing excruciatingly slow startup time followed by extermely poor responsiveness on the Android 2.0 emulator? I've got Eclipse Ganymede 3.4.1, Android SDK 5. My Android 1.5 emulator launches in a flash and performs pretty close to the device itself. Whereas 2.0 moves in super-slow-mo. I'm using the Droid skin fromhttp://teavuihuang.com/android/ The hardware I'm running on is more than capable, albeit I admit I'm on Vista :-( The point is the old emulator flies (and all my other apps fly), and the new emulator crawls. Any ideas? Thanks Jay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 camera.setParameters(p) - Picture size must be 213x350?
In 2.0, apps should call getSupportedPictureSizes to get valid picture sizes and then setPictureSize. http://developer.android.com/reference/android/hardware/Camera.Parameters.html#getSupportedPictureSizes() On Nov 17, 12:28 am, Streets Of Boston flyingdutc...@gmail.com wrote: That's just in the emulator. The emulatedcameraonly 'takes' 213x350 pixel pictures. And you need to deal with it anyway in your code, just in case you set some picture width/height that is not supported by some real Android phone. On Oct 29, 10:03 am, chrispix chris...@gmail.com wrote: I am having an issue w/ 2.0 in the emulator when I am trying to set a couple of parameters. Including the size. It appears these messages appear.. I guess my question is, why is the picture size stuck at 213x350? If I set my picture size to 640x480 it fails. Chris. 10-29 14:55:24.261: DEBUG/CameraService(31): getParameters(picture- format=jpeg;picture-size=213x350;preview-format=yuv422sp;preview-frame- rate=15;preview-size=176x144) 10-29 14:55:24.261: DEBUG/CameraService(31): setParameters(preview- size=176x144;preview-format=yuv422sp;picture-size=640x480;picture- format=jpeg;preview-frame-rate=15) 10-29 14:55:24.261: ERROR/CameraHardwareStub(31): Still picture size must be size of canned JPEG (213x350) 10-29 14:55:24.271: DEBUG/CameraService(31): setParameters(focus- mode=auto;preview-size=176x144;preview-format=yuv422sp;picture- size=640x480;rotation=90;picture-format=jpeg;preview-frame-rate=15) 10-29 14:55:24.271: ERROR/CameraHardwareStub(31): Still picture size must be size of canned JPEG (213x350) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Hi, Does this SDK support gdata api's? Regards ravi prasad On Oct 27, 9:45 pm, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
test On 27 oct, 10:45, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Thanks a lot for the work ! Regards On Nov 4, 9:07 am, Nishant nish...@saltriver.com wrote: Hello, Why in-build javax.sound API of Java not introduced in Android 2.0? Lots of problems occur in Android Sound API (AudioTrack as well as MediaPlayer). Regards, Nishant Shah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Contacts FAQ?
I would like to add one more question to this issue: 15) What is the best way to write the code so in case the API Level is below 5, some of the contacts actions can still be done correctly. As far as I've checked when publishing an application on the market there is no way to publish two apks, for different API levels. As noted in other threads, the only Phone I know of currently running Android 2.0 is the Motorola Droid. My guess is that every developer would like to be able to support other/older phones as well. On Nov 17, 8:38 pm, Rachel Blackman ceruleanspa...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Jeff Sharkey wrote: [ ... snip ... ] Thank you! I'll try to write up an updated FAQ this evening, with some short examples written for various queries, and post a draft. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Contacts FAQ?
On Nov 18, 2009, at 1:43 AM, GDroid wrote: I would like to add one more question to this issue: 15) What is the best way to write the code so in case the API Level is below 5, some of the contacts actions can still be done correctly. As far as I've checked when publishing an application on the market there is no way to publish two apks, for different API levels. As noted in other threads, the only Phone I know of currently running Android 2.0 is the Motorola Droid. My guess is that every developer would like to be able to support other/older phones as well. If I understand rightly from what the Google folks have said in this thread so far, as long as you're willing to accept the limitations of the old API (dealing only with the raw contacts of the primary Google account, not the combined ones) AND you are not using any private contacts API, things should still work. If you have specific bits of contact goo that are not working at all under 2.0, go ahead and share 'em so that people can hash them out? :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Contacts FAQ?
15) What is the best way to write the code so in case the API Level is below 5, some of the contacts actions can still be done correctly. Here's an excellent example that uses new ContactsContact APIs when available, or otherwise falls back to the original API: http://code.google.com/p/android-business-card/ -- Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 (eclair) source
[My Problem] repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git ... Getting manifest ... from git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git ssh: connect to host partner.source.android.com port 22: Connection timed out fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly fatal: cannot obtain manifest git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git [Fix] rm -rf .repo mv ~/.gitconfig ~/.gitconfig.bak repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git Hope this helps ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Contacts FAQ?
4) What sort of identifier should I represent a contact with in my local data, so I can later get their most-current data? Use lookup-style Uris, as they are designed to help with fuzzy resolution when the contact changes, or is split/joined by the user. Contacts.getLookupUri() and Data.getContactLookupUri() can help you build these lookup Uris from columns when you already know them, or from normal ContentUris.withAppendedId()-style Uris. 6) How do I add a contact to the address book from within an app? One of the easiest ways is to use Intents.Insert, since it doesn't require adding the WRITE_CONTACTS permission to your app: http://d.android.com/reference/android/provider/ContactsContract.Intents.Insert.html 7) How do I add custom data to a contact? Pick a well-scoped MIME-type and just start using it as Data.MIMETYPE when inserting custom Data rows. For example, a row describing a VoIP profile might use something like vnd.android.cursor.item/vnd.com.example.voip.profile. 9) How do I /get/ the nifty status messages and the source for them (a'la 'Away for lunch' on 'Google Talk,' or 'eating a pie!' on 'Facebook'), so I can display them alongside a contact in my own app? (Alternatively, some ask how they can set the nifty status messages and have them appear in the QuickContact bar or in other apps.) Status messages like that can be read through StatusUpdates, and each row is strongly tied to a Data row. When status information is displayed across the system, there is logic that picks the best update based on timestamp. http://d.android.com/reference/android/provider/ContactsContract.StatusUpdates.html To add StatusUpdates you should attach them to a specific RawContact owned by your application. (This allows users to split and join the RawContact from your service to the correct person in their address book.) 10) How do I add an action to the QuickContact bar for a contact? This is partially covered in this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/thread/fe814aa9149da1f0/ When Quick Contact encounters a custom Data row, it follows that row back to the owning sync adapter (through ACCOUNT_NAME and _TYPE) to look for XML metadata that describes how to render the row, both as a list item when viewing the contact, and as a Quick Contact icon. The Quick Contact case also performs PackageManager queries to find apps that support ACTION_VIEW on the custom MIME-type defined for that row, which means you'll need to add an intent-filter. 13) How do I add a contact to a group? 14) How do I remove a contact from a group? Similar to the original Contacts API, RawContacts can contain Data rows that indicate GroupMembership. -- Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Contacts FAQ?
On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Jeff Sharkey wrote: [ ... snip ... ] Thank you! I'll try to write up an updated FAQ this evening, with some short examples written for various queries, and post a draft. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
Hey Dmitri --
I have a question regarding the legacy apps only having access to the
primary account. I am writing an application that interfaces with
contacts and started on it before 2.0 was released. I am developing
with a Motorola CLIQ running 1.5 and my app works fine. Today, I
purchased a Droid (2.0) and after setting it up I installed this 1.5
application, only to find that I have a much larger list of contacts
and the names in the list are all blank! The code to read the
contacts is as follows:
String[] PROJECTION = new String[] { Contacts.People._ID,
Contacts.PeopleColumns.NAME };
Cursor c = managedQuery(Contacts.People.CONTENT_URI, PROJECTION,
null,
null, Contacts.People.DEFAULT_SORT_ORDER);
startManagingCursor(c);
adapter = new SimpleCursorAdapter(this,
android.R.layout.simple_list_item_multiple_choice, c,
new String[] { Contacts.PeopleColumns.NAME },
new int[] { android.R.id.text1 });
return adapter;
Can you riddle me this? Since I selected google mail as an already
existing source of contacts during the activation, was this somehow
designated my primary account? I notice this code is not picking up
contacts I add by hand to the Droid either. I understand the design
challenges with merging many lists, so I won't scream about this to
you. However, can you tell me how I would read the contacts under 2.0
and if there is a test I could make in my class to read them the 2.0
way or not? Also, can you tell me how the contact primary key comes
into play? I had to create my own SQL database to keep track of my
contact related attributes and I am keying on the _id from the contact
database.
Peace,
Scott
On Oct 30, 2:05 pm, Dmitri Plotnikov dplotni...@google.com wrote:
It's deprecated, not removed. The old API is still functional, but with
restrictions:
1. If your app was using something non-public, that part is likely to break.
We tested a bunch of apps on the market against the legacy API - most
worked, but some did not. Those were the cases when the app was using some
knowledge of the undocumented underlying database structure.
2. Legacy API will only give you access to the primary account, i.e. the
first Google account you add to the phone.
- Dmitri
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM, nEx.Software email.nex.softw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hold up... I'm confused. Are you saying that Contacts portion of the
SDK is deprecated? Whatever happened to stick to the SDK because
those are stable apis that won't break in future versions? Very
disappointing...
On Oct 30, 11:12 am, Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com wrote:
Could you post the exact Uri you're passing to query()? As the
javadoc describes, you need to append a filter string to the
CONTENT_FILTER_URI so it knows what to filter on.
Uri lookupUri = Uri.withAppendedPath(PhoneLookup.CONTENT_URI,
phoneNumber);
Also, you might be able to skip your second step, since you can
directly ask for the PhoneLookup.DISPLAY_NAME column in the
projection.
j
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:05 AM, agirardello
andrea.girarde...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I'm trying to adapt my application (Personalytics) for the brand new
Android 2.0, however I'm facing an issue while accessing contacts'
phone numbers...
What I need to do is to retrieve the name associated to a stored
contact based on his/her phone number. At present I'm doing this in
two steps:
1) from a phone number I get the corresponding ID of the stored
contact (if present)
2) I retrieve the contact's name based on that ID
I managed to use the correct CONTENT_URI for reading contacts by using
reflection to be fully compatible with Android 2.0
(ContactsContract.Contacts.CONTENT_URI) and the previous versions
(People.CONTENT_URI).
Now I'm trying to do the same for Phones.CONTENT_URI (Android = 1.6)
and ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI (Android = 2.0)
which is needed by step 2) mentioned above. But as soon as I try to
get a contentResolver by using
ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI I get the following
exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown URL
content://com.android.contacts/phone_lookup
This looks really strange to me, since it should be correct (it is
part of the official API)! Moreover, I tried to look at the API
Demos project, in particular to the classes:
com.example.android.apis.view.List2
com.example.android.apis.view.List3
which are still using the deprecated People.CONTENT_URI and
Phones.CONTENT_URI and thus no data (i.e. contacts) is loaded (of
course I have sample contacts in the emulator).
- Do you have any suggestion to solve
Re: [android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ravi textlo...@gmail.com wrote: Now 2.0 Breaks every thing. Wow that's pretty over-the-top. The original contacts API still works, as long as you weren't using private parts of it, and only for the primary Google account. So it still gives you the same functionality (the new feature of additional accounts is not accessible from it, but that is why a new API was required) as before. And as we've said repeatedly for everything, if you use private APIs you will break in the future, so that shouldn't be a surprise. -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
And as we've said repeatedly for everything, if you use private APIs you will break in the future, so that shouldn't be a surprise. You can also get your name on my handy dandy androidhallofshame website for using private APIs. :) On Nov 17, 1:31 pm, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ravi textlo...@gmail.com wrote: Now 2.0 Breaks every thing. Wow that's pretty over-the-top. The original contacts API still works, as long as you weren't using private parts of it, and only for the primary Google account. So it still gives you the same functionality (the new feature of additional accounts is not accessible from it, but that is why a new API was required) as before. And as we've said repeatedly for everything, if you use private APIs you will break in the future, so that shouldn't be a surprise. -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
Both Wow! and over-the-top. Now I am excited. This pattern/technique was lifted from a distinguished Android pro's recent textbook. So does the wow imply there is a better way to accomplish the mission? I think I considered the contact PICK Intent, but I need to allow the user to select multiples. If you can advise a published way to pull this off across the a- versions, I may just buy you a lovely beverage! Peace, Scott On Nov 17, 2:31 pm, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ravi textlo...@gmail.com wrote: Now 2.0 Breaks every thing. Wow that's pretty over-the-top. The original contacts API still works, as long as you weren't using private parts of it, and only for the primary Google account. So it still gives you the same functionality (the new feature of additional accounts is not accessible from it, but that is why a new API was required) as before. And as we've said repeatedly for everything, if you use private APIs you will break in the future, so that shouldn't be a surprise. -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
How do we then get all contacts/phonenumbers from all accounts? If I use the new Contacts API and send an ACTION.PICK for phone numbers like Intent i = new Intent(Intent.ACTION_PICK, android.provider.ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_URI); it doesn't give me for example Facebook account phone numbers. even Intent i = new Intent(Intent.ACTION_PICK, android.provider.ContactsContract.Contacts.CONTENT_URI); doesn't show a list of all available contacts from all accounts (again I tried with Facebook contacts and they didn't show up). Dianne, could you please tell us how we use the PICK intent to get a list of all available phone numbers from all accounts. This would be really helpful. On Nov 17, 3:31 pm, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ravi textlo...@gmail.com wrote: Now 2.0 Breaks every thing. Wow that's pretty over-the-top. The original contacts API still works, as long as you weren't using private parts of it, and only for the primary Google account. So it still gives you the same functionality (the new feature of additional accounts is not accessible from it, but that is why a new API was required) as before. And as we've said repeatedly for everything, if you use private APIs you will break in the future, so that shouldn't be a surprise. -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 camera.setParameters(p) - Picture size must be 213x350?
That's just in the emulator. The emulated camera only 'takes' 213x350 pixel pictures. And you need to deal with it anyway in your code, just in case you set some picture width/height that is not supported by some real Android phone. On Oct 29, 10:03 am, chrispix chris...@gmail.com wrote: I am having an issue w/ 2.0 in the emulator when I am trying to set a couple of parameters. Including the size. It appears these messages appear.. I guess my question is, why is the picture size stuck at 213x350? If I set my picture size to 640x480 it fails. Chris. 10-29 14:55:24.261: DEBUG/CameraService(31): getParameters(picture- format=jpeg;picture-size=213x350;preview-format=yuv422sp;preview-frame- rate=15;preview-size=176x144) 10-29 14:55:24.261: DEBUG/CameraService(31): setParameters(preview- size=176x144;preview-format=yuv422sp;picture-size=640x480;picture- format=jpeg;preview-frame-rate=15) 10-29 14:55:24.261: ERROR/CameraHardwareStub(31): Still picture size must be size of canned JPEG (213x350) 10-29 14:55:24.271: DEBUG/CameraService(31): setParameters(focus- mode=auto;preview-size=176x144;preview-format=yuv422sp;picture- size=640x480;rotation=90;picture-format=jpeg;preview-frame-rate=15) 10-29 14:55:24.271: ERROR/CameraHardwareStub(31): Still picture size must be size of canned JPEG (213x350) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 (eclair) source
Not sure how accurate this info is, but i read (can't remember where now! Doh!) that the eclair branch is not and will not be public. You have to wait until they merge it into master, i think some modules have been done done all ready. Let us know if this wrong!! Ne0 On 8 Nov, 06:51, jpntiger jpntiger.w...@gmail.com wrote: Anybody had success getting eclair source? On Nov 5, 9:27 am, Eric eric.gerv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue. It used to say that there were noeclair branch. Fair enough. However now there is aneclairbranch, only repo fails to get it with the ugly error message outlined by Doug. Eric On Oct 28, 8:50 pm, tu tuqh...@163.com wrote: Yes, I also entered the same error message, some body can help us ASAP? thanks and best regards. On 10月29日, 上午2时53分, Doug dougforp...@gmail.com wrote: Any idea when theeclairsourcewill be available viagit? If I try to init a repo with -beclair I get an error stating that the manifest is missing. If I init a repo to head there doesn't seem to be much/anyeclaircode in there. Why do I ask? Well, the docs looks like they're still in the process of being updated (fair enough) but certain methods that have now been deprecated don't seem to have been replaced with ones that perform similar tasks - I need to browse thesourceso I can find out how to get my application working against this new build. (I got the following init command fromhttp://source.android.com/download) $ repo init -ugit://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git-beclair Getting repo ... fromgit://android.git.kernel.org/tools/repo.git remote: Counting objects: 945, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (372/372), done. remote: Total 945 (delta 592), reused 894 (delta 553) Receiving objects: 100% (945/945), 282.14 KiB, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (592/592), done. . . . * [new branch] eclair - origin/eclair . . . Fromgit://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest * [new tag] android-1.0 -android-1.0 fatal: manifest 'default.xml' not available fatal: manifest default.xml not found -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 (eclair) source
Eclair is now in AOSP http://groups.google.com/group/android-platform/browse_thread/thread/db968455d490dfad On Nov 16, 7:24 am, Master_Ne0 master.ne0s.soluti...@googlemail.com wrote: Not sure how accurate this info is, but i read (can't remember where now! Doh!) that the eclair branch is not and will not be public. You have to wait until they merge it into master, i think some modules have been done done all ready. Let us know if this wrong!! Ne0 On 8 Nov, 06:51, jpntiger jpntiger.w...@gmail.com wrote: Anybody had success getting eclair source? On Nov 5, 9:27 am, Eric eric.gerv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue. It used to say that there were noeclair branch. Fair enough. However now there is aneclairbranch, only repo fails to get it with the ugly error message outlined by Doug. Eric On Oct 28, 8:50 pm, tu tuqh...@163.com wrote: Yes, I also entered the same error message, some body can help us ASAP? thanks and best regards. On 10月29日, 上午2时53分, Doug dougforp...@gmail.com wrote: Any idea when theeclairsourcewill be available viagit? If I try to init a repo with -beclair I get an error stating that the manifest is missing. If I init a repo to head there doesn't seem to be much/anyeclaircode in there. Why do I ask? Well, the docs looks like they're still in the process of being updated (fair enough) but certain methods that have now been deprecated don't seem to have been replaced with ones that perform similar tasks - I need to browse thesourceso I can find out how to get my application working against this new build. (I got the following init command fromhttp://source.android.com/download) $ repo init -ugit://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git-beclair Getting repo ... fromgit://android.git.kernel.org/tools/repo.git remote: Counting objects: 945, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (372/372), done. remote: Total 945 (delta 592), reused 894 (delta 553) Receiving objects: 100% (945/945), 282.14 KiB, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (592/592), done. . . . * [new branch] eclair - origin/eclair . . . Fromgit://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest * [new tag] android-1.0 -android-1.0 fatal: manifest 'default.xml' not available fatal: manifest default.xml not found -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 (eclair) source
Hi, discussion about the source code should be directed to android-porting, where these questions have probably already been answered. Thanks! On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Master_Ne0 master.ne0s.soluti...@googlemail.com wrote: Not sure how accurate this info is, but i read (can't remember where now! Doh!) that the eclair branch is not and will not be public. You have to wait until they merge it into master, i think some modules have been done done all ready. Let us know if this wrong!! Ne0 On 8 Nov, 06:51, jpntiger jpntiger.w...@gmail.com wrote: Anybody had success getting eclair source? On Nov 5, 9:27 am, Eric eric.gerv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue. It used to say that there were noeclair branch. Fair enough. However now there is aneclairbranch, only repo fails to get it with the ugly error message outlined by Doug. Eric On Oct 28, 8:50 pm, tu tuqh...@163.com wrote: Yes, I also entered the same error message, some body can help us ASAP? thanks and best regards. On 10月29日, 上午2时53分, Doug dougforp...@gmail.com wrote: Any idea when theeclairsourcewill be available viagit? If I try to init a repo with -beclair I get an error stating that the manifest is missing. If I init a repo to head there doesn't seem to be much/anyeclaircode in there. Why do I ask? Well, the docs looks like they're still in the process of being updated (fair enough) but certain methods that have now been deprecated don't seem to have been replaced with ones that perform similar tasks - I need to browse thesourceso I can find out how to get my application working against this new build. (I got the following init command fromhttp:// source.android.com/download) $ repo init -ugit:// android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git-beclair Getting repo ... fromgit://android.git.kernel.org/tools/repo.git remote: Counting objects: 945, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (372/372), done. remote: Total 945 (delta 592), reused 894 (delta 553) Receiving objects: 100% (945/945), 282.14 KiB, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (592/592), done. . . . * [new branch] eclair- origin/eclair . . . Fromgit://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest * [new tag]android-1.0 -android-1.0 fatal: manifest 'default.xml' not available fatal: manifest default.xml not found -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comandroid-developers%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Google Maps Navigation and app use of turn-by-turn directions?
While I don't have an answer to this question, I would like to concur with the sentiment in the hopes that this thread would get more attention. I am currently working on developing a location based service application and would like to use Google Maps Navigation as I don't want to get involved in the navigation aspect of development. Although an API would be ideal, I was thinking one possible way to do this may be through a Content Provider (for example the Contacts database). If Google Maps uses a Content Provider that an application could get permission to access, then maybe the Content Provider can be used to supply a destination address for instance. Just a thought. Maybe someone out there may have some more insight into if or how one can interface with Google Maps Navigation. Thanks. On Oct 29, 1:19 pm, blindfold seeingwithso...@gmail.com wrote: Is anything known about how an app may tap turn-by-turn directions generated by Android 2.0's Google MapsNavigation? Until now we were prohibited by the Google Maps ToS to offer turn-by-turn directions in our apps. Clearly it would be attractive to integrate some of that functionality in other mobile applications, or to be able to exert some level of control over Google MapsNavigationfrom one's app. In other words, are there any supplementary APIs for use with Google MapsNavigation? Or does Google MapsNavigationrun as a Service such that at least one need not switch between applications to still get spoken turn-by-turn directions even while one's app Activity is running in the foreground? See also the discussion in the TTS-for-Android group athttp://groups.google.com/group/tts-for-android/browse_thread/thread/4... Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 camera.setParameters(p) - Picture size must be 213x350?
Saw the same error. The app works fine on Android 1.5 and 1.6. On Oct 29, 7:03 am, chrispix chris...@gmail.com wrote: I am having an issue w/ 2.0 in the emulator when I am trying to set a couple of parameters. Including the size. It appears these messages appear.. I guess my question is, why is the picture size stuck at 213x350? If I set my picture size to 640x480 it fails. Chris. 10-29 14:55:24.261: DEBUG/CameraService(31): getParameters(picture- format=jpeg;picture-size=213x350;preview-format=yuv422sp;preview-frame- rate=15;preview-size=176x144) 10-29 14:55:24.261: DEBUG/CameraService(31): setParameters(preview- size=176x144;preview-format=yuv422sp;picture-size=640x480;picture- format=jpeg;preview-frame-rate=15) 10-29 14:55:24.261: ERROR/CameraHardwareStub(31): Still picture size must be size of canned JPEG (213x350) 10-29 14:55:24.271: DEBUG/CameraService(31): setParameters(focus- mode=auto;preview-size=176x144;preview-format=yuv422sp;picture- size=640x480;rotation=90;picture-format=jpeg;preview-frame-rate=15) 10-29 14:55:24.271: ERROR/CameraHardwareStub(31): Still picture size must be size of canned JPEG (213x350) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 and ADP (necessary to flash the ADP?)
if we want to use/create the wireless or blue-tooth application then what to use ? On Nov 13, 4:57 pm, WoodManEXP woodman...@gmail.com wrote: How are we suppose to take advantage of the 2.0 upgrades if it is not going to be available for the ADPs? Will it ever be available for the ADPs? On Nov 12, 2:24 pm, Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote: That is because android 2.0 is closed source. On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM,WoodManEXPwoodman...@gmail.com wrote: Apologies if this is a silly question, but is it necessary to flash an updated OS into the ADP1 to run SDK version 5 apps in the ADP? If so where are the images? I do not see them athttp://developer.htc.com/adp.html like for the other system images. Any one know? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK - BluetoothSocket Question
Nick, Thanks. Didn't know which discussion board you were reading more often :) Thanks for your response. Chen Ganir. On Nov 14, 2:31 am, Nick Pelly npe...@google.com wrote: Answered this one on android-platform. On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Chen Ganir chen.ga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I've read the new API specifications for the BluetoothSocket and i encountered some unresolved issues regarding the connection limitations for BluetoothServerSocket. At http://developer.android.com/reference/android/bluetooth/BluetoothAda... there is a description of the Creation of BluetoothServerSocket.It says there that it creates a new listening RFCOMMsocketfor incoming connections. One should use accept to get the connected BluetoothSocket from this ServerSocket. My questions are : 1. What happens if a connection is established before accept is called? Will it hold and wait for an accept command or dropped until an accept command is invoked and allow reconnection? 2. Can more than one connections exist to a single BluetoothSocketServer? Athttp://developer.android.com/reference/android/bluetooth/BluetoothSer... the accept method is described. My questions are : 3. Will i get a connected BluetoothSocket for a connection which was established prior to calling the accept method? 4. What happens if after the first accept, i do another accept? Will i get another incoming connection? Or will the BluetoothServerSocket block any incoming connections until the previous connection is disconnected? 5. If Connection Queue is available - what is the limit? how many connections will be held in Queue ? 5. Does the BluetoothServerSocket support multiple connections from different devices? What about multiple connections from the same device? Athttp://code.google.com/p/apps-for-android/source/browse/trunk/BTClick... there is a sample application demonstrating the use of BluetoothSocket and BluetoothServerSocket. This application creates 7 different servers (different UUID's) and listens to 7 incoming connections on 7 different servers. In addition, this sample closes the BluetoothServerSocket once a single connection is made to each of the servers. This does not show the behavior of the API as described in the official API documentation. I would appreciate any thoughts or ideas you have about this issue. Thanks, Chen Ganir. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Contacts FAQ?
A Blog entry about the new Contacts API from Google covering these points would be helpful. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 and ADP (necessary to flash the ADP?)
How are we suppose to take advantage of the 2.0 upgrades if it is not going to be available for the ADPs? Will it ever be available for the ADPs? On Nov 12, 2:24 pm, Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote: That is because android 2.0 is closed source. On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM,WoodManEXPwoodman...@gmail.com wrote: Apologies if this is a silly question, but is it necessary to flash an updated OS into the ADP1 to run SDK version 5 apps in the ADP? If so where are the images? I do not see them athttp://developer.htc.com/adp.html like for the other system images. Any one know? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Xavier, Where is the 2.0 system image for ADP? On Oct 27, 11:45 am, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 and ADP (necessary to flash the ADP?)
Hello, Sadly 2.0 is only available for the Motorola Droid at the moment, so stick with a 2.0 AVD for now. Tom. On Nov 12, 2:33 pm, WoodManEXP woodman...@gmail.com wrote: Apologies if this is a silly question, but is it necessary to flash an updated OS into the ADP1 to run SDK version 5 apps in the ADP? If so where are the images? I do not see them athttp://developer.htc.com/adp.html like for the other system images. Any one know? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 and ADP (necessary to flash the ADP?)
Thank you Tom. This means the android:minSdkVersion in the Manifest should stay at 3 or 4 for now, right, since the ADP can only get to 4? On Nov 12, 9:56 am, Thomas Riley tomrile...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello, Sadly 2.0 is only available for the Motorola Droid at the moment, so stick with a 2.0 AVD for now. Tom. On Nov 12, 2:33 pm,WoodManEXPwoodman...@gmail.com wrote: Apologies if this is a silly question, but is it necessary to flash an updated OS into the ADP1 to run SDK version 5 apps in the ADP? If so where are the images? I do not see them athttp://developer.htc.com/adp.html like for the other system images. Any one know? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Now just waiting for Android 2.0 Firmware for the Google Dev 1 Phone... So can actually test apps. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 vs 1.6 not running
Found the culprit.
I was calling Looper.prepare() in a thread outside of the main paint
thread, It seemed this stopped the painting.
Strange that 2.0 would not work but 1.6 worked.
On Nov 10, 5:03 pm, Chopcsu st...@kilsby.com.au wrote:
I Have an app that is running fine in 1.6,
I have now updated my sdk to 2.0 and the app never starts properly
I was wondering if anyone had an idea of what would stop an app
running on the newer version that runs fine usually.
Once it is started, it runs threads correctly, but nothing gets
displayed then i get the error
WARN/ActivityManager(69): Activity idle timeout for HistoryRecord
{43b57a38 com.vlm.DojoSquabble/.Mid}
I have another application that is very similar that works correctly.
Its manifest defines its Activity class
as android:name=.Mid , whereas the app that is failing has it as
android:name=Mid . Does not seem to make a difference when i change
it but it is the only thing i can see that is different
Any help would be appreciated but if I figure it out ill post my
findings here anyway.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 web capabilities question
Mark -- Thank you for the reply. I used the word streaming because my code uses C# Stream objects to download the file (one for reading, one for writing). One thing I didn't make clear is that I want my application to execute the downloads offline, in the background, something else I still need to make sure is possible. (Similar to the way my gmail gets downloaded while the Droid is in standby.) -ted -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 web capabilities question
Tuno wrote: Thank you for the reply. I used the word streaming because my code uses C# Stream objects to download the file (one for reading, one for writing). One thing I didn't make clear is that I want my application to execute the downloads offline, in the background, something else I still need to make sure is possible. (Similar to the way my gmail gets downloaded while the Droid is in standby.) Sure, downloading in the background is perfectly fine. You will want to create a Service that is scheduled via AlarmManager to wake up and grab the files at your desired time. Since that work may take a while, you'll need to grab a WakeLock, to make sure the phone doesn't go back to sleep while the work is going on. You can see an implementation of that pattern here: http://github.com/commonsguy/cw-advandroid/tree/master/SystemServices/Alarm/ There's probably an existing app that does scheduled file downloads if you don't want to write it yourself. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com | http://twitter.com/commonsguy Android 1.6 Programming Books: http://commonsware.com/books -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 (eclair) source
Anybody had success getting eclair source? On Nov 5, 9:27 am, Eric eric.gerv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same issue. It used to say that there were noeclair branch. Fair enough. However now there is aneclairbranch, only repo fails to get it with the ugly error message outlined by Doug. Eric On Oct 28, 8:50 pm, tu tuqh...@163.com wrote: Yes, I also entered the same error message, some body can help us ASAP? thanks and best regards. On 10月29日, 上午2时53分, Doug dougforp...@gmail.com wrote: Any idea when theeclairsourcewill be available via git? If I try to init a repo with -beclair I get an error stating that the manifest is missing. If I init a repo to head there doesn't seem to be much/anyeclaircode in there. Why do I ask? Well, the docs looks like they're still in the process of being updated (fair enough) but certain methods that have now been deprecated don't seem to have been replaced with ones that perform similar tasks - I need to browse thesourceso I can find out how to get my application working against this new build. (I got the following init command fromhttp://source.android.com/download) $ repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git -beclair Getting repo ... from git://android.git.kernel.org/tools/repo.git remote: Counting objects: 945, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (372/372), done. remote: Total 945 (delta 592), reused 894 (delta 553) Receiving objects: 100% (945/945), 282.14 KiB, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (592/592), done. . . . * [new branch] eclair- origin/eclair . . . From git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest * [new tag]android-1.0 -android-1.0 fatal: manifest 'default.xml' not available fatal: manifest default.xml not found -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 (eclair) source
I'm having the same issue. It used to say that there were no eclair branch. Fair enough. However now there is an eclair branch, only repo fails to get it with the ugly error message outlined by Doug. Eric On Oct 28, 8:50 pm, tu tuqh...@163.com wrote: Yes, I also entered the same error message, some body can help us ASAP? thanks and best regards. On 10月29日, 上午2时53分, Doug dougforp...@gmail.com wrote: Any idea when theeclairsourcewill be available via git? If I try to init a repo with -beclair I get an error stating that the manifest is missing. If I init a repo to head there doesn't seem to be much/anyeclaircode in there. Why do I ask? Well, the docs looks like they're still in the process of being updated (fair enough) but certain methods that have now been deprecated don't seem to have been replaced with ones that perform similar tasks - I need to browse thesourceso I can find out how to get my application working against this new build. (I got the following init command fromhttp://source.android.com/download) $ repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git -beclair Getting repo ... from git://android.git.kernel.org/tools/repo.git remote: Counting objects: 945, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (372/372), done. remote: Total 945 (delta 592), reused 894 (delta 553) Receiving objects: 100% (945/945), 282.14 KiB, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (592/592), done. . . . * [new branch] eclair - origin/eclair . . . From git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest * [new tag] android-1.0 -android-1.0 fatal: manifest 'default.xml' not available fatal: manifest default.xml not found -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Hello, Why in-build javax.sound API of Java not introduced in Android 2.0? Lots of problems occur in Android Sound API (AudioTrack as well as MediaPlayer). Regards, Nishant Shah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Hi. I'm trying to produce source code for the SDK (gather it from the git repository and put it under ./sources directory under platform-2.0). i can't however find a tag in the git repository of 2.0 ? can anyone tell me why ? how do i check out the code of 2.0 ? Eyal. On Oct 27, 6:45 pm, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Hi, You can download source code from: http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/dalvik.git;a=tree;hb=HEAD Thanks Regards, Nishant Shah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Thats not 2.0. ISTR 2.0 sources are tagged, but only the bare minimum to cover the sdk gpl requirements. On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Nishant nish...@saltriver.com wrote: Hi, You can download source code from: http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/dalvik.git;a=tree;hb=HEAD Thanks Regards, Nishant Shah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
It's deprecated, not removed. The old API is still functional, but with restrictions: 1. If your app was using something non-public, that part is likely to break. We tested a bunch of apps on the market against the legacy API - most worked, but some did not. Those were the cases when the app was using some knowledge of the undocumented underlying database structure. 2. Legacy API will only give you access to the primary account, i.e. the first Google account you add to the phone. - Dmitri On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM, nEx.Software email.nex.softw...@gmail.com wrote: Hold up... I'm confused. Are you saying that Contacts portion of the SDK is deprecated? Whatever happened to stick to the SDK because those are stable apis that won't break in future versions? Very disappointing... On Oct 30, 11:12 am, Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com wrote: Could you post the exact Uri you're passing to query()? As the javadoc describes, you need to append a filter string to the CONTENT_FILTER_URI so it knows what to filter on. Uri lookupUri = Uri.withAppendedPath(PhoneLookup.CONTENT_URI, phoneNumber); Also, you might be able to skip your second step, since you can directly ask for the PhoneLookup.DISPLAY_NAME column in the projection. j On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:05 AM, agirardello andrea.girarde...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I'm trying to adapt my application (Personalytics) for the brand new Android 2.0, however I'm facing an issue while accessing contacts' phone numbers... What I need to do is to retrieve the name associated to a stored contact based on his/her phone number. At present I'm doing this in two steps: 1) from a phone number I get the corresponding ID of the stored contact (if present) 2) I retrieve the contact's name based on that ID I managed to use the correct CONTENT_URI for reading contacts by using reflection to be fully compatible with Android 2.0 (ContactsContract.Contacts.CONTENT_URI) and the previous versions (People.CONTENT_URI). Now I'm trying to do the same for Phones.CONTENT_URI (Android = 1.6) and ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI (Android = 2.0) which is needed by step 2) mentioned above. But as soon as I try to get a contentResolver by using ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI I get the following exception: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown URL content://com.android.contacts/phone_lookup This looks really strange to me, since it should be correct (it is part of the official API)! Moreover, I tried to look at the API Demos project, in particular to the classes: com.example.android.apis.view.List2 com.example.android.apis.view.List3 which are still using the deprecated People.CONTENT_URI and Phones.CONTENT_URI and thus no data (i.e. contacts) is loaded (of course I have sample contacts in the emulator). - Do you have any suggestion to solve this problem? - Or is there another approach I can use to get the name of a contact based on one of his/her numbers? (This must work on all versions of Android) Thank you ;-) Andrea -- Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comandroid-developers%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Source code
anyone knows when 2.0 source will be public??? On Oct 31, 12:41 pm, AndroidKing rbasso...@gmail.com wrote: why isn't the source code for 2.0 on the public repository.. developing for Android without looking at the source code is impossible due to poor APIs and or documentations please make this public ASAP, or most applications will break with 2.0 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Bluetooth Code Samples
It's awesome thanks CLC On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:11 AM, CLC clchen+...@google.comclchen%2b...@google.com wrote: Hi jb, Here is some sample code that uses Bluetooth: http://code.google.com/p/apps-for-android/source/browse/trunk/BTClickLinkCompete This is the demo that was shown in the Eclair 2.0 video. You run the app on two (or more) Android 2.0 devices, and you can then flick the Android robot between the screens of the devices as if it were all just one big screen. -Charles On Oct 27, 5:25 pm, jb jburket...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone have any working code with the added Bluetooth support? Also, were you able to get Bluetooth working in the AVD? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comandroid-developers%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
Could you post the exact Uri you're passing to query()? As the javadoc describes, you need to append a filter string to the CONTENT_FILTER_URI so it knows what to filter on. Uri lookupUri = Uri.withAppendedPath(PhoneLookup.CONTENT_URI, phoneNumber); Also, you might be able to skip your second step, since you can directly ask for the PhoneLookup.DISPLAY_NAME column in the projection. j On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:05 AM, agirardello andrea.girarde...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I'm trying to adapt my application (Personalytics) for the brand new Android 2.0, however I'm facing an issue while accessing contacts' phone numbers... What I need to do is to retrieve the name associated to a stored contact based on his/her phone number. At present I'm doing this in two steps: 1) from a phone number I get the corresponding ID of the stored contact (if present) 2) I retrieve the contact's name based on that ID I managed to use the correct CONTENT_URI for reading contacts by using reflection to be fully compatible with Android 2.0 (ContactsContract.Contacts.CONTENT_URI) and the previous versions (People.CONTENT_URI). Now I'm trying to do the same for Phones.CONTENT_URI (Android = 1.6) and ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI (Android = 2.0) which is needed by step 2) mentioned above. But as soon as I try to get a contentResolver by using ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI I get the following exception: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown URL content://com.android.contacts/phone_lookup This looks really strange to me, since it should be correct (it is part of the official API)! Moreover, I tried to look at the API Demos project, in particular to the classes: com.example.android.apis.view.List2 com.example.android.apis.view.List3 which are still using the deprecated People.CONTENT_URI and Phones.CONTENT_URI and thus no data (i.e. contacts) is loaded (of course I have sample contacts in the emulator). - Do you have any suggestion to solve this problem? - Or is there another approach I can use to get the name of a contact based on one of his/her numbers? (This must work on all versions of Android) Thank you ;-) Andrea -- Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Hello, You probably need to set up the proxy settings in the Android application's Settings. That did the trick for me. See also this thread for other problems which was referenced above: http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/thread/63a44163a8d07cd9# Regards Marek On Oct 29, 2:05 pm, Abhi abhishek.r.sha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am having trouble upgrading my SDK 1.6 to 2.0 on my laptop. My laptop is behind my company's firewall and when I try to install the new SDK components using the Android SDK and AVD Manager, I get this error saying Failed to fetch URLhttp://dl-ssl.google.com/android/repository/repository.xml, reason: Connection timed out: connect. I tried all methods, using Eclipse, using command 'android.bat update sdk' and also directly running 'SDK Setup.exe'. Please help! I need to get this new SDK running ASAP. Thanks, Abhi On Oct 27, 12:45 pm, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
Hold up... I'm confused. Are you saying that Contacts portion of the SDK is deprecated? Whatever happened to stick to the SDK because those are stable apis that won't break in future versions? Very disappointing... On Oct 30, 11:12 am, Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com wrote: Could you post the exact Uri you're passing to query()? As the javadoc describes, you need to append a filter string to the CONTENT_FILTER_URI so it knows what to filter on. Uri lookupUri = Uri.withAppendedPath(PhoneLookup.CONTENT_URI, phoneNumber); Also, you might be able to skip your second step, since you can directly ask for the PhoneLookup.DISPLAY_NAME column in the projection. j On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:05 AM, agirardello andrea.girarde...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I'm trying to adapt my application (Personalytics) for the brand new Android 2.0, however I'm facing an issue while accessing contacts' phone numbers... What I need to do is to retrieve the name associated to a stored contact based on his/her phone number. At present I'm doing this in two steps: 1) from a phone number I get the corresponding ID of the stored contact (if present) 2) I retrieve the contact's name based on that ID I managed to use the correct CONTENT_URI for reading contacts by using reflection to be fully compatible with Android 2.0 (ContactsContract.Contacts.CONTENT_URI) and the previous versions (People.CONTENT_URI). Now I'm trying to do the same for Phones.CONTENT_URI (Android = 1.6) and ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI (Android = 2.0) which is needed by step 2) mentioned above. But as soon as I try to get a contentResolver by using ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI I get the following exception: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown URL content://com.android.contacts/phone_lookup This looks really strange to me, since it should be correct (it is part of the official API)! Moreover, I tried to look at the API Demos project, in particular to the classes: com.example.android.apis.view.List2 com.example.android.apis.view.List3 which are still using the deprecated People.CONTENT_URI and Phones.CONTENT_URI and thus no data (i.e. contacts) is loaded (of course I have sample contacts in the emulator). - Do you have any suggestion to solve this problem? - Or is there another approach I can use to get the name of a contact based on one of his/her numbers? (This must work on all versions of Android) Thank you ;-) Andrea -- Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
The original, public android.provider.Contacts APIs that has shipped since Android 1.0 are still very much supported, but are now marked as deprecated. There are additional features (like multiple accounts) that will require upgrading to the new android.provider.ContactsContract APIs to access. For example, only data from the primary account is exposed through the now-legacy android.provider.Contacts APIs. j On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM, nEx.Software email.nex.softw...@gmail.com wrote: Hold up... I'm confused. Are you saying that Contacts portion of the SDK is deprecated? Whatever happened to stick to the SDK because those are stable apis that won't break in future versions? Very disappointing... On Oct 30, 11:12 am, Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com wrote: Could you post the exact Uri you're passing to query()? As the javadoc describes, you need to append a filter string to the CONTENT_FILTER_URI so it knows what to filter on. Uri lookupUri = Uri.withAppendedPath(PhoneLookup.CONTENT_URI, phoneNumber); Also, you might be able to skip your second step, since you can directly ask for the PhoneLookup.DISPLAY_NAME column in the projection. j On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:05 AM, agirardello andrea.girarde...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I'm trying to adapt my application (Personalytics) for the brand new Android 2.0, however I'm facing an issue while accessing contacts' phone numbers... What I need to do is to retrieve the name associated to a stored contact based on his/her phone number. At present I'm doing this in two steps: 1) from a phone number I get the corresponding ID of the stored contact (if present) 2) I retrieve the contact's name based on that ID I managed to use the correct CONTENT_URI for reading contacts by using reflection to be fully compatible with Android 2.0 (ContactsContract.Contacts.CONTENT_URI) and the previous versions (People.CONTENT_URI). Now I'm trying to do the same for Phones.CONTENT_URI (Android = 1.6) and ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI (Android = 2.0) which is needed by step 2) mentioned above. But as soon as I try to get a contentResolver by using ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI I get the following exception: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown URL content://com.android.contacts/phone_lookup This looks really strange to me, since it should be correct (it is part of the official API)! Moreover, I tried to look at the API Demos project, in particular to the classes: com.example.android.apis.view.List2 com.example.android.apis.view.List3 which are still using the deprecated People.CONTENT_URI and Phones.CONTENT_URI and thus no data (i.e. contacts) is loaded (of course I have sample contacts in the emulator). - Do you have any suggestion to solve this problem? - Or is there another approach I can use to get the name of a contact based on one of his/her numbers? (This must work on all versions of Android) Thank you ;-) Andrea -- Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com -- Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: [Android 2.0] Accessing contact's phone numbers
Jeff, thanks for clarifying. I'd hate to have seen a bunch of apps break in the meantime. On Oct 30, 1:26 pm, Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com wrote: The original, public android.provider.Contacts APIs that has shipped since Android 1.0 are still very much supported, but are now marked as deprecated. There are additional features (like multiple accounts) that will require upgrading to the new android.provider.ContactsContract APIs to access. For example, only data from the primary account is exposed through the now-legacy android.provider.Contacts APIs. j On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM, nEx.Software email.nex.softw...@gmail.com wrote: Hold up... I'm confused. Are you saying that Contacts portion of the SDK is deprecated? Whatever happened to stick to the SDK because those are stable apis that won't break in future versions? Very disappointing... On Oct 30, 11:12 am, Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com wrote: Could you post the exact Uri you're passing to query()? As the javadoc describes, you need to append a filter string to the CONTENT_FILTER_URI so it knows what to filter on. Uri lookupUri = Uri.withAppendedPath(PhoneLookup.CONTENT_URI, phoneNumber); Also, you might be able to skip your second step, since you can directly ask for the PhoneLookup.DISPLAY_NAME column in the projection. j On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:05 AM, agirardello andrea.girarde...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I'm trying to adapt my application (Personalytics) for the brand new Android 2.0, however I'm facing an issue while accessing contacts' phone numbers... What I need to do is to retrieve the name associated to a stored contact based on his/her phone number. At present I'm doing this in two steps: 1) from a phone number I get the corresponding ID of the stored contact (if present) 2) I retrieve the contact's name based on that ID I managed to use the correct CONTENT_URI for reading contacts by using reflection to be fully compatible with Android 2.0 (ContactsContract.Contacts.CONTENT_URI) and the previous versions (People.CONTENT_URI). Now I'm trying to do the same for Phones.CONTENT_URI (Android = 1.6) and ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI (Android = 2.0) which is needed by step 2) mentioned above. But as soon as I try to get a contentResolver by using ContactsContract.PhoneLookup.CONTENT_FILTER_URI I get the following exception: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown URL content://com.android.contacts/phone_lookup This looks really strange to me, since it should be correct (it is part of the official API)! Moreover, I tried to look at the API Demos project, in particular to the classes: com.example.android.apis.view.List2 com.example.android.apis.view.List3 which are still using the deprecated People.CONTENT_URI and Phones.CONTENT_URI and thus no data (i.e. contacts) is loaded (of course I have sample contacts in the emulator). - Do you have any suggestion to solve this problem? - Or is there another approach I can use to get the name of a contact based on one of his/her numbers? (This must work on all versions of Android) Thank you ;-) Andrea -- Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com -- Jeff Sharkey jshar...@android.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0: Browser/WebView can no longer load fonts?
Here is the associated bug: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=4448 BoD On Oct 29, 11:57 pm, BoD bodl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Suppress local search on key event
I guess I'm answering myself again. *** And a question below. First to get this out of the way: Suppressing the quick search box works as before. Catch keyCode == KEY_SEARCH and return true; in the overriden onKeyDown() or onKeyUp() I got confused here for a while by the following problem: Following the release notes I switched from overriding onKeyDown() to onKeyUp() to call the desired functionality for all buttons with alternate action. In my case, this includes BACK. There's a problem with _BACK however. With the physical keyboard on an Ion running 1.6, onKeyUp() is being dispatched to the activity that BACK returns to (one back in the call stack). That of course leads to the unintended result of executing BACK there, now that onKeyUp() is used to execute the alternative action of the BACK key. That, I suppose, is behind the pattern in the release notes (http:// developer.android.com/intl/zh-TW/sdk/android-2.0.html), using .startTracking() and a couple of additional, new methods. The problem with this: This is 2.0 only, i.e. not backwards compatible, and the following advice is to hack something together so the legacy application (as the release notes so delicately put it) can function on both 1.x and 2.0 devices. With no chance to test this on 2.0 without a new device that uses soft keys, I suppose. (Have had that before) Let me propose a much simpler approach: * Is it possible for an app to query whether key events are issued in a key-down/key-up pair, or key-up only? With such a switch it should be much simpler: Just execute the alternative action following a key down for the variant key-down/key-up versus following a key up. On Oct 29, 10:05 pm, JP joachim.pfeif...@gmail.com wrote: One of my apps implements a search function which is invoked when the user presses the Search button. In 1.6, Android Quick Search Box can be suppressed by overriding Activity.onKeyDown() and picking out KEY_SEARCH. On Android 2.0, no more... Android's Quick Search pops up no matter whether Activity.onKeyDown(), Activity.onKeyUp() is overridden, or Activity.setDefaultKey(DEFAULT_KEYS_DISABLE) is set. Has anybody had any luck getting rid of the Android Quick Search? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
cl working On 10月28日, 上午12时45分, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Bluetooth Code Samples
Hi jb, Here is some sample code that uses Bluetooth: http://code.google.com/p/apps-for-android/source/browse/trunk/BTClickLinkCompete This is the demo that was shown in the Eclair 2.0 video. You run the app on two (or more) Android 2.0 devices, and you can then flick the Android robot between the screens of the devices as if it were all just one big screen. -Charles On Oct 27, 5:25 pm, jb jburket...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone have any working code with the added Bluetooth support? Also, were you able to get Bluetooth working in the AVD? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 (eclair) source
Yes, I also entered the same error message, some body can help us ASAP? thanks and best regards. On 10月29日, 上午2时53分, Doug dougforp...@gmail.com wrote: Any idea when theeclairsourcewill be available via git? If I try to init a repo with -beclair I get an error stating that the manifest is missing. If I init a repo to head there doesn't seem to be much/anyeclaircode in there. Why do I ask? Well, the docs looks like they're still in the process of being updated (fair enough) but certain methods that have now been deprecated don't seem to have been replaced with ones that perform similar tasks - I need to browse thesourceso I can find out how to get my application working against this new build. (I got the following init command fromhttp://source.android.com/download) $ repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git -beclair Getting repo ... from git://android.git.kernel.org/tools/repo.git remote: Counting objects: 945, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (372/372), done. remote: Total 945 (delta 592), reused 894 (delta 553) Receiving objects: 100% (945/945), 282.14 KiB, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (592/592), done. . . . * [new branch] eclair - origin/eclair . . . From git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest * [new tag] android-1.0 -android-1.0 fatal: manifest 'default.xml' not available fatal: manifest default.xml not found --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Hi, I am having trouble upgrading my SDK 1.6 to 2.0 on my laptop. My laptop is behind my company's firewall and when I try to install the new SDK components using the Android SDK and AVD Manager, I get this error saying Failed to fetch URL http://dl-ssl.google.com/android/repository/repository.xml, reason: Connection timed out: connect. I tried all methods, using Eclipse, using command 'android.bat update sdk' and also directly running 'SDK Setup.exe'. Please help! I need to get this new SDK running ASAP. Thanks, Abhi On Oct 27, 12:45 pm, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Bluetooth Code Samples
Hi, Thanks for the code sample. I have a problem, though. I've rad that the Emulator does not allow Bluetooth. How to test this? I have a G1 from an operator. Thanks, Tamas On okt. 29, 02:11, CLC clchen+...@google.com wrote: Hi jb, Here is some sample code that uses Bluetooth:http://code.google.com/p/apps-for-android/source/browse/trunk/BTClick... This is the demo that was shown in the Eclair 2.0 video. You run the app on two (or more) Android 2.0 devices, and you can then flick the Android robot between the screens of the devices as if it were all just one big screen. -Charles On Oct 27, 5:25 pm, jb jburket...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone have any working code with the added Bluetooth support? Also, were you able to get Bluetooth working in the AVD? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
When will the android 2.0 upgrade be pushed onto the phones like the G1 and myTouch? On Oct 29, 7:05 am, Abhi abhishek.r.sha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am having trouble upgrading my SDK 1.6 to 2.0 on my laptop. My laptop is behind my company's firewall and when I try to install the new SDK components using the Android SDK and AVD Manager, I get this error saying Failed to fetch URLhttp://dl-ssl.google.com/android/repository/repository.xml, reason: Connection timed out: connect. I tried all methods, using Eclipse, using command 'android.bat update sdk' and also directly running 'SDK Setup.exe'. Please help! I need to get this new SDK running ASAP. Thanks, Abhi On Oct 27, 12:45 pm, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Bluetooth Code Samples
There is not bluetooth support in the emulator. You will need a device running android 2.0 Xav On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:59 AM, tjozsa tjo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for the code sample. I have a problem, though. I've rad that the Emulator does not allow Bluetooth. How to test this? I have a G1 from an operator. Thanks, Tamas On okt. 29, 02:11, CLC clchen+...@google.com wrote: Hi jb, Here is some sample code that uses Bluetooth:http://code.google.com/p/apps-for-android/source/browse/trunk/BTClick... This is the demo that was shown in the Eclair 2.0 video. You run the app on two (or more) Android 2.0 devices, and you can then flick the Android robot between the screens of the devices as if it were all just one big screen. -Charles On Oct 27, 5:25 pm, jb jburket...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone have any working code with the added Bluetooth support? Also, were you able to get Bluetooth working in the AVD? Thanks. -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. Please do not send me questions directly. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Hi, I am all excited with the new release. I can't wait for the documentation to be released. I am having problems with the Maps API. Thanks and Regards, Dexter http://tech-droid.blogspot.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
On Oct 28, 9:40 am, mingkg21 mingkg21 mingk...@gmail.com wrote: http://androidappdocs.appspot.com/sdk/android-2.0.html 在中国用这个访问吧。 nice tips...lol --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
hi.i am new to this group..kindly tell me about Android. On Oct 28, 9:34 am, James W jpbwebs...@gmail.com wrote: A question about the Bluetooth functionality... it says that Bluetooth 2.1 is supported, and particularly the OPP (Object Push Profile). Specifically, does this mean that we will finally be able to send and receive files between other phones and PCs? OPP is I beleive based on OBEX, which is what tends to normally be used for this sort of thing. Really hoping the answer is yes, as then the most requested and highly starred issue in the Google Android codeset will finally be put to rest! http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=1725 I still feel a twinge of shame whenever I am asked to bluetooth a photo to a friend's WinMo or Nokia, and have to admit my shiny new Android smartphone lacks that basic functionality.. On Oct 28, 12:45 am, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
For what it's worth, I believe the biggest causes of apps breaking on the newer devices are them having trouble with the new screen densities / sizes, and them using private APIs. We got the screen support out earlier in 1.6 and have been trying to beat that drum to get people to start to address that, since that is one of the biggest impacts on them. It's also a tedious and boring task - not your fault obviously. That doesn't mean it'll get done any quicker though ;) There are certainly some specific kinds of apps where running against specific hardware is much more useful (open gl and camera are the two main ones that I would think about), but as far as dealing with different platform versions, the platform is the platform, and whether you run it in the emulator or on one device or another it behaves the same. Are you allowed to say anything about Droid's openGl version? From looking at all the leaks (or PR if you ask me) it seems to be a 2.0 device like the 3gs or pre but there is nothing in the documentation --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:16 AM, MrChaz mrchazmob...@googlemail.com wrote: Are you allowed to say anything about Droid's openGl version? From looking at all the leaks (or PR if you ask me) it seems to be a 2.0 device like the 3gs or pre but there is nothing in the documentation Hm, well OpenGL is not my area, but we would be making a lot of noise if there was some big upcoming device that was not compatible with any of the existing OpenGL apps. Of course, OpenGL is one of those tricky things since the actual implementation of the API comes with the hardware, so different hardware can have slight different behavior that breaks assumptions of some apps. -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Force close in contacts app
Xavier - one of our apps is very dependent on contact data. Right now, running it in the Emulator with a couple contacts added in the Contacts app, it appears to be completely broken. I suspect it is something to do with a change in the behaviour of group memberships. I'd like to port it to 2.0 and the new ContactsContract API. Before I can do that effectively, I will need to be able to populate an emulator with realistic test data, which I think means running a couple of sync adapters. Is there anything we can do to make progress ? Thanks, Richard On Oct 27, 11:53 pm, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: this is a known issue. However, note that the system image for 2.0 does not include any sync adapters so you wouldn't be able to add any account anyway. Xav On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Alexey alex...@gmail.com wrote: When I launch Contacts app in the emulator for API level 5, then go to Menu - Accounts, I get exception. Anyone else see this. How to try new multiple Accounts feature? -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. Please do not send me questions directly. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 Force close in contacts app
hi Xav, Andorid 2.0 SDK release page talks more about Contacts Sync Adaptor, which is not supported in Official Android 2.0 SDK. Could you please let me know when it will be supported. Will there be another 2.0 SDK release with Sync Adaptor changes?. Regards, Sukumar. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: this is a known issue. However, note that the system image for 2.0 does not include any sync adapters so you wouldn't be able to add any account anyway. Xav On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Alexey alex...@gmail.com wrote: When I launch Contacts app in the emulator for API level 5, then go to Menu - Accounts, I get exception. Anyone else see this. How to try new multiple Accounts feature? -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. Please do not send me questions directly. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
OK, I could not install Android 2.0, API 5, rev1 because of this error: SSL peer shut down incorrectly. What does this mean? Next, download from Eclipse is so slow, is there any way to download standalone redistributable for Android 2.0 and then install it? I mean, like it was for 1.5 and 1.6. Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
How can I use the new MotionEvent API with multiple touches on the emulator ? On Oct 27, 9:45 pm, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:34 PM, James W jpbwebs...@gmail.com wrote: A question about the Bluetooth functionality... it says that Bluetooth 2.1 is supported, and particularly the OPP (Object Push Profile). Specifically, does this mean that we will finally be able to send and receive files between other phones and PCs? Yes OPP is I beleive based on OBEX, which is what tends to normally be used for this sort of thing. OBEX is the object exchange protocol. OPP is Object Push. It is a description of how the user uses OBEX - in this case to push files. Android 2.0 has OBEX and OPP. Really hoping the answer is yes, as then the most requested and highly starred issue in the Google Android codeset will finally be put to rest! http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=1725 I still feel a twinge of shame whenever I am asked to bluetooth a photo to a friend's WinMo or Nokia, and have to admit my shiny new Android smartphone lacks that basic functionality.. On Oct 28, 12:45 am, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
Yeah it would but given it's their job to support the community and the community is demanding more maybe they should start to look at their practices. On Oct 26, 11:41 pm, Marco Nelissen marc...@android.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Frank arro...@gmail.com wrote: Why is the SDK for all android releases always so late on arrival? Developers usually have barely 1-2 weeks to prepare before the release is dropped into consumer's hands. With Android 2.0 coming out soon on the Droid, set to be announced in October 28th and then possibly releasing in November, the developers are once again VERY late in the game. I know it takes a lot of work in getting an SDK with all the documentation out. Yes, it does. But maybe release a beta SDK just for developers first? As changes are implemented, newer beta SDKs are provided? At Wouldn't that be even *more* work? least now developers are given MORE time to optimize and verify that their apps still work on the new version release. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
In the words of the big bad D - Huzzah! Android 2.0 SDK: http://bit.ly/bKGWM; Al. -- * Looking for Android Apps? - Try http://andappstore.com/ * == Funky Android Limited is registered in England Wales with the company number 6741909. The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's subsidiaries.On Oct 27, 9:14 am, MrChaz mrchazmob...@googlemail.com wrote: Yeah it would but given it's their job to support the community and the community is demanding more maybe they should start to look at their practices. On Oct 26, 11:41 pm, Marco Nelissen marc...@android.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Frank arro...@gmail.com wrote: Why is the SDK for all android releases always so late on arrival? Developers usually have barely 1-2 weeks to prepare before the release is dropped into consumer's hands. With Android2.0coming out soon on the Droid, set to be announced in October 28th and then possibly releasing in November, the developers are once again VERY late in the game. I know it takes a lot of work in getting an SDK with all the documentation out. Yes, it does. But maybe release a beta SDK just for developers first? As changes are implemented, newer beta SDKs are provided? At Wouldn't that be even *more* work? least now developers are given MORE time to optimize and verify that their apps still work on the new version release. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:14 AM, MrChaz mrchazmob...@googlemail.com wrote: Yeah it would but given it's their job to support the community and the community is demanding more maybe they should start to look at their practices. It's not my job to support the community, but since I'm obviously doing so poorly at it, this will be my last post. In any case, all I meant to say was that the reasoning in the first message in this thread is flawed: if SDKs are late because it's a lot of work to put them together, then having multiple beta SDK releases will be even more work, and is therefore likely not going to result in faster delivery. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
WOot! 2.0 SDK. And Multitouch! for devices that support it, up to 3 points at once. Great! On Oct 27, 11:25 am, Marco Nelissen marc...@android.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:14 AM, MrChaz mrchazmob...@googlemail.com wrote: Yeah it would but given it's their job to support the community and the community is demanding more maybe they should start to look at their practices. It's not my job to support the community, but since I'm obviously doing so poorly at it, this will be my last post. In any case, all I meant to say was that the reasoning in the first message in this thread is flawed: if SDKs are late because it's a lot of work to put them together, then having multiple beta SDK releases will be even more work, and is therefore likely not going to result in faster delivery. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
That assumes that each sdk is an independent unrelated release, which is not the case. Multiple -FINAL- sdks may in fact be more work, but multiple betas are not - the work done to release rc1 is built upon by rc2, rc3...rcN and the final release. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Marco Nelissen marc...@android.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:14 AM, MrChaz mrchazmob...@googlemail.com wrote: Yeah it would but given it's their job to support the community and the community is demanding more maybe they should start to look at their practices. It's not my job to support the community, but since I'm obviously doing so poorly at it, this will be my last post. In any case, all I meant to say was that the reasoning in the first message in this thread is flawed: if SDKs are late because it's a lot of work to put them together, then having multiple beta SDK releases will be even more work, and is therefore likely not going to result in faster delivery. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
I agree that the work may be built on each successive release. I think a bigger issue may be that items come and go through a beta release cycle. If you got beta1 and relied on getAndroidToastButteringSchedule(), if it never makes to to the final release and you failed to keep up with successive beta releases you are really going to be hacked off at everyone but yourself.The current developer community (present company excluded) seems to be very green and will probably make many mistakes regarding the development process. I have now lost my train of thought... I guess to sum it up it would be nice if there were beta releases for seasoned developers that know how to handle them and don't expect much support but I see it turning into a flame fest if that were to happen. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote: That assumes that each sdk is an independent unrelated release, which is not the case. Multiple -FINAL- sdks may in fact be more work, but multiple betas are not - the work done to release rc1 is built upon by rc2, rc3...rcN and the final release. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Marco Nelissen marc...@android.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:14 AM, MrChaz mrchazmob...@googlemail.com wrote: Yeah it would but given it's their job to support the community and the community is demanding more maybe they should start to look at their practices. It's not my job to support the community, but since I'm obviously doing so poorly at it, this will be my last post. In any case, all I meant to say was that the reasoning in the first message in this thread is flawed: if SDKs are late because it's a lot of work to put them together, then having multiple beta SDK releases will be even more work, and is therefore likely not going to result in faster delivery. -- Writing code is one of few things that teaches me I don't know everything. http://www.fuligin.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
Last cycle there were betas for seasoned developers - they were part of the still-missing open source release. (Unless you needed calendars or google services/google maps, it worked fine..) On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Wayne Wenthin wa...@fuligin.com wrote: I agree that the work may be built on each successive release. I think a bigger issue may be that items come and go through a beta release cycle. If you got beta1 and relied on getAndroidToastButteringSchedule(), if it never makes to to the final release and you failed to keep up with successive beta releases you are really going to be hacked off at everyone but yourself. The current developer community (present company excluded) seems to be very green and will probably make many mistakes regarding the development process. I have now lost my train of thought... I guess to sum it up it would be nice if there were beta releases for seasoned developers that know how to handle them and don't expect much support but I see it turning into a flame fest if that were to happen. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote: That assumes that each sdk is an independent unrelated release, which is not the case. Multiple -FINAL- sdks may in fact be more work, but multiple betas are not - the work done to release rc1 is built upon by rc2, rc3...rcN and the final release. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Marco Nelissen marc...@android.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:14 AM, MrChaz mrchazmob...@googlemail.com wrote: Yeah it would but given it's their job to support the community and the community is demanding more maybe they should start to look at their practices. It's not my job to support the community, but since I'm obviously doing so poorly at it, this will be my last post. In any case, all I meant to say was that the reasoning in the first message in this thread is flawed: if SDKs are late because it's a lot of work to put them together, then having multiple beta SDK releases will be even more work, and is therefore likely not going to result in faster delivery. -- Writing code is one of few things that teaches me I don't know everything. http://www.fuligin.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
wow~ Now we have bluetooth! On Oct 27, 5:45 pm, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Thanks for your hard work. On 27 oct, 17:45, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
I want to congratulate you guys on how speedy the 2.0 SDK has been pushed out. After just releasing 1.6 and it did not include many of the features people were hoping for (Bluetooth SDK, multi-touch, etc) I figured we'd be well into 2010 before we even were close to these much desired platform features. I haven't had a chance to look at sync adapters, but I think those could end up being the single greatest improvement to 2.0! So, once again, congratulations! I think the grumbling is more about how all the development is done behind closed doors, if this weren't the case then a simple git pull would be enough to give developers an idea of how their apps will work in future releases without putting extra burden on Android engineers. And I think most of us here know that it's not your guys' decision whether or not to keep Android and AOSP so far apart. I for one am excited about the speed of the maturation of the Android platform. Once the platform really matures, I think the difference between a hypothetical Android 3.1 and 3.2 won't be so great that everyone will be so touchy about the way it is released. Thanks again to all the android team. -E On Oct 27, 9:25 am, Marco Nelissen marc...@android.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:14 AM, MrChaz mrchazmob...@googlemail.com wrote: Yeah it would but given it's their job to support the community and the community is demanding more maybe they should start to look at their practices. It's not my job to support the community, but since I'm obviously doing so poorly at it, this will be my last post. In any case, all I meant to say was that the reasoning in the first message in this thread is flawed: if SDKs are late because it's a lot of work to put them together, then having multiple beta SDK releases will be even more work, and is therefore likely not going to result in faster delivery. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
Sorry if we hurt your feelings, but if you can't take the heat, then this indeed might not be for you. Outside of that I agree with Disconnect. We all like to think we're done in one step but the reality is a different one. From what I can gather, the Android team has lost the community by remaining silent about the release of 2.0 just to come out one full day in advance of the release of the first devices(s?). This doesn't work as far as the community of independent devs is concerned. Everybody understands that, and some acknowledgment on the part of the Android team would go a long way towards the future. On Oct 27, 9:25 am, Marco Nelissen marc...@android.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:14 AM, MrChaz mrchazmob...@googlemail.com wrote: Yeah it would but given it's their job to support the community and the community is demanding more maybe they should start to look at their practices. It's not my job to support the community, but since I'm obviously doing so poorly at it, this will be my last post. In any case, all I meant to say was that the reasoning in the first message in this thread is flawed: if SDKs are late because it's a lot of work to put them together, then having multiple beta SDK releases will be even more work, and is therefore likely not going to result in faster delivery. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
I'm guessing there must be some sort of non-disclosure involved with this Droid thing and Android 2.0, or else we would have something to work with. It's a bit frightening to think that there could be 100,000+ devices sold on day one and I've never seen the SDK, don't know if my app will break or have any idea what workload I'll be stuck with when the release reaches my desk. The real stinker here is that the popularity index in the market seems to be tied to the retention percentage (the number of people that download the app and keep it). If my apps malfunction on this droid thing and 2000 people download it, find it defective and uninstall, the app will plummet in the rankings (Radar Now is currently 60%, #28 in News and Weather and #478 overall). -John Coryat Radar Now! What Zip Code? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Love some of the new features in the new SDK! :) Any idea when the ADP1 will see a 2.0 ROM so my soon to be created 2.0 code can be tested in my hand? Thanks, Tom. On Oct 27, 4:45 pm, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Android 2.0 seems to be awesome!!! Will be available for ADP1/G1 ? I am asking, because I have ADP1 and I know that there are some storage problems and there was a discussion about 1.6 if it will be available to ADP1. I am with 1.6, but will 2.0 be available to ADP1? Thanks! And great improvements!!! On 27 Окт, 18:45, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Android 2.0 seems to have great improvements and interesting features. Great work. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Xavier Ducrohet x...@android.com wrote: Hello everyone! We've just announced the Android 2.0 SDK http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-support-in-sdk.html If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and Tools (fixed in rev 3) For more information about using the SDK Manager, see: http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html Have fun! Xav -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence. ... Albert Einstein. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Aniruddh Bajirao www.ryze.com/Aniruddh --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
I thought your ranking was based on absolute retention count, not on percentage. Your rating will suffer however even when only a fraction of those 2000 people give you 1 star because your app is broken on their phone... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0
We'll see here soon (tomorrow maybe?). I have an app ahead of me that's in the 1000-5000 count range for downloads and my install numbers are approaching 5000, so if it's absolute installs, then the app ahead of me should move to the 5000-1 count range by tomorrow. Interesting to find out. -John Coryat Radar Now! What Zip Code? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
