RE: [Asterisk-Users] Randy Bush is a destructive force with a hidden professional agenda
Bradley D. Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your on notice as of now and you're being watched. Don't try to destroy this community like the trail of destruction behind you! Who died and made you king of the mail list? From what I can see, Randy Bush asked a question about whether he should use SIP or IAX. It seems that some members of this community are determined to drive him away from IAX and have him use SIP. It would seem to me that anyone new to Asterisk would wonder why a proprietary protocol has been created when SIP is a well established IETF standard. I know the answer, as do many others. If you're unable to post a well reasoned argument for or against IAX then perhaps you should refrain from following up to such questions in the future. People are entitled to ask questions; If no questions were asked then this mail list would not have the volume of articles that it has. -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Randy Bush ate my hamster (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] Randy Bush is a destructive force with a hidden professional agenda)
he did i tell you! i'm still in counselling... altho come to think , i was in counselling anyway.. Steve On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Bradley D. Thornton wrote: . Monday, July 5, 2004 15:50:06 (-08:00hrs UTC) Hello asterisk-users, From the following post: On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Joe Baptista wrote: On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote: i did not criticize the protocol. remember, my question started with i am looking at iax to see if it is applicable to my needs. i don't need nats, nat traversal, nat anything. if i did, iax might well be one of the technologies i would consider. but i don't. Your up to no good again. Trying to troll? Look Bush it pretty easy - if you want a PBX use asterisk if not go away. regards joe Watch out for this man Bush! He is a professional espionage troll and hides his agent status behind his condescending facade. What do you want Randy? Go back to Admiralty way with all your ICANNite cronies if you're not going to behave here! Your on notice as of now and you're being watched. Don't try to destroy this community like the trail of destruction behind you! If you wanna play nice in the sandbox then okay, but most people know better than to trust you any farther than they can throw you already - This community and the associated technologies aren't subject to usurpation by the Special Interest groups that fund your espionage and agitation activities! Lots of people on this list already know who are - the bane of DNS. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Randy Bush is a destructive force with a hidden professional agenda
Bradley D. Thornton wrote: snip i don't need nats, nat traversal, nat anything. if i did, iax might well be one of the technologies i would consider. but i don't. snip Watch out for this man Bush! He is a professional espionage troll and hides his agent status behind his condescending facade. What do you want Randy? Go back to Admiralty way with all your ICANNite cronies if you're not going to behave here! I have no idea who Randy Bush is but I found it funny the first article I found on him was a presentation on why NAT is evil espically for voice. Now he asserts that NAT traversal is not needed. http://www.apnic.net/meetings/17/docs/sigs/policy/addrpol-pres-randy-nats.pdf Can anyone give me a quick rundown on why there's such discontent for this person -Adam ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Randy Bush is a destructive force with a hidden professional agenda
I have no idea who Randy Bush is but I found it funny the first article I found on him was a presentation on why NAT is evil espically for voice. Now he asserts that NAT traversal is not needed. http://www.apnic.net/meetings/17/docs/sigs/policy/addrpol-pres-randy-nats.pdf I read his message as saying that NAT isn't an problem /he will be facing in what he is aiming to setup/. Given the context around his stuff, I wouldn't be surprised if thats what he meant. / -- emphasis|deemphasis things. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Randy Bush is a destructive force with a hidden professional agenda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no idea who Randy Bush is but I found it funny the first article I found on him was a presentation on why NAT is evil espically for voice. Now he asserts that NAT traversal is not needed. http://www.apnic.net/meetings/17/docs/sigs/policy/addrpol-pres-randy-nats.pdf I read his message as saying that NAT isn't an problem /he will be facing in what he is aiming to setup/. Given the context around his stuff, I wouldn't be surprised if thats what he meant. / -- emphasis|deemphasis things. Very true, my apologies, I only saw what people had selected in their replies. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
