Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Ciao! On 11/07/2012 05:27 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: Raffaella, would you please add a line in the webpage stating how to install cinelerra, once the the PPA has been enabled? Done! Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
I removed Cinelerra and installed Cinelerra-CV and this time it works. Thanks for all the discussion on this topic. It CV could not install because of dependency problems in Ubuntu 12.10 when I first tried it. However, it did work this week. Murray --- On Thu, 11/8/12, raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu wrote: From: raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Received: Thursday, November 8, 2012, 2:33 AM Ciao! I finally migrated cinelerra's builds to use the new name cinelerra-cv. Thank you so much! :-) Raffaella, would you please add a line in the webpage stating how to install cinelerra, once the the PPA has been enabled? Sure. Sorry for the delay. Somehow I messed up my git push ability to update the Cin site. I have to fix that first. Ciao Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Ciao! I finally migrated cinelerra's builds to use the new name cinelerra-cv. Thank you so much! :-) Raffaella, would you please add a line in the webpage stating how to install cinelerra, once the the PPA has been enabled? Sure. Sorry for the delay. Somehow I messed up my git push ability to update the Cin site. I have to fix that first. Ciao Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Dear All, I finally migrated cinelerra's builds to use the new name cinelerra-cv. The name change will affect all the related libraries. The new builds are available in the main PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa If you have been using such PPA, I recommend installing the cinelerra-cv package. This will remove the old series (cinelerra) and install the new one. It goes without saying that the older cinelerra builds are no longer available nor maintained. Raffaella, would you please add a line in the webpage stating how to install cinelerra, once the the PPA has been enabled? sudo apt-get install cinelerra-cv Please let me know if you find any issue. Thanks. Nicola From: blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:07:53 +1100 On 06/11/12 20:32, Raffaella Traniello wrote: Ciao! On 11/06/2012 05:20 AM, Basil Chupin wrote: I looked at this- http://cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.php which shows that Cinelerra CV has not been compiled for Ubuntu for quite some time ... actually it shows only that I forgot to update that page!! Sorry about that. I'll fix it as soon as I can. Ciao! Raffaella Ah! Well, there you are: the answer is readily at hand :-) . BC -- Using openSUSE 12.2 x86_64 KDE 4.9.2 kernel 3.6.5-1 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair Vengeance RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Ciao! On 11/06/2012 05:20 AM, Basil Chupin wrote: I looked at this- http://cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.php which shows that Cinelerra CV has not been compiled for Ubuntu for quite some time ... actually it shows only that I forgot to update that page!! Sorry about that. I'll fix it as soon as I can. Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
On 06/11/12 20:32, Raffaella Traniello wrote: Ciao! On 11/06/2012 05:20 AM, Basil Chupin wrote: I looked at this- http://cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.php which shows that Cinelerra CV has not been compiled for Ubuntu for quite some time ... actually it shows only that I forgot to update that page!! Sorry about that. I'll fix it as soon as I can. Ciao! Raffaella Ah! Well, there you are: the answer is readily at hand :-) . BC -- Using openSUSE 12.2 x86_64 KDE 4.9.2 kernel 3.6.5-1 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair Vengeance RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. Does this apply to everyone? Like is the CV version itself no longer maintained and we should all use Heroine's version 4.x? If that's not the case, for those of us running straight Debian, is deb-multimedia still the recommended place to get the packages? Thanks for the clarification. Sincerely, Sean M. Pappalardo - This E-Mail message has been scanned for viruses content and cleared by smaRTmail from Renegade Technologies http://www.renegadetech.com/ - ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote: On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. Does this apply to everyone? Like is the CV version itself no longer maintained and we should all use Heroine's version 4.x? If that's not the case, for those of us running straight Debian, is deb-multimedia still the recommended place to get the packages? Thanks for the clarification. The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. What your problem is is that the CV is not being compiled from source file for Ubuntu. On the other hand, I am using openSUSE and I have the very latest Cinelerra CV - released only a day or so ago - readily available (and installed). BC -- Using openSUSE 12.2 x86_64 KDE 4.9.2 kernel 3.6.5-1 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair Vengeance RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Ciao! On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. I remember the discussion of a few year ago about the confusion between Cinelerra HV and Cinelerra CV, especially for packaging. At the time both packages were available for Ubuntu. Then we decided to call the community version cinelerra-cv and the original upstream cinelerra The website title was renamed accordingly http://cinelerra.org/ and so the git repo http://git.cinelerra.org/gitweb?p=CinelerraCV.git;a=summary That cleared the confusion. I'm in favour of maintaining this tradition and naming all packages of the community version cinelerra-cv. I'd prefer the PPA containing the community version to be called cinelerra-cv A PPA called cinelerra should contain the HV version. Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
From: Basil Chupin blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 5:02:17 AM Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote: On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. Does this apply to everyone? Like is the CV version itself no longer maintained and we should all use Heroine's version 4.x? If that's not the case, for those of us running straight Debian, is deb-multimedia still the recommended place to get the packages? Thanks for the clarification. The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. What your problem is is that the CV is not being compiled from source file for Ubuntu. On the other hand, I am using openSUSE and I have the very latest Cinelerra CV - released only a day or so ago - readily available (and installed). BC I am using Ubuntu 12.10 and would not want to change distributions simply to be able to use Cinelerra-CV. I am getting the impression that the CV version is not being kept up to date for Ubuntu, and perhaps not for many other distributions such as Debian. Is that correct? If so, I guess I will have to stick with the HW Version. Murray
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
BC Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for Ubuntu, in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The current binaries are based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent patches. I am not sure why you keep saying that CV is not compiled from source for CV. I have no interest nor motivation to make another ppa for the HW, maybe someone else can take that task. When time will allow me, I will try to modify the package names to reflect that what is in the PPA really is cinelerra-cv. NF From: wmstr...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:21:42 -0800 From: Basil Chupin blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 5:02:17 AM Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote: On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. Does this apply to everyone? Like is the CV version itself no longer maintained and we should all use Heroine's version 4.x? If that's not the case, for those of us running straight Debian, is deb-multimedia still the recommended place to get the packages? Thanks for the clarification. The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. What your problem is is that the CV is not being compiled from source file for Ubuntu. On the other hand, I am using openSUSE and I have the very latest Cinelerra CV - released only a day or so ago - readily available (and installed). BC I am using Ubuntu 12.10 and would not want to change distributions simply to be able to use Cinelerra-CV. I am getting the impression that the CV version is not being kept up to date for Ubuntu, and perhaps not for many other distributions such as Debian. Is that correct? If so, I guess I will have to stick with the HW Version. Murray
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Furthermore, as suggested, if one prefers, compiling cinelerra (either version, really) it's simple enough. From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:03:13 -0800 BC Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for Ubuntu, in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The current binaries are based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent patches. I am not sure why you keep saying that CV is not compiled from source for CV. I have no interest nor motivation to make another ppa for the HW, maybe someone else can take that task. When time will allow me, I will try to modify the package names to reflect that what is in the PPA really is cinelerra-cv. NF From: wmstr...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:21:42 -0800 From: Basil Chupin blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 5:02:17 AM Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote: On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. Does this apply to everyone? Like is the CV version itself no longer maintained and we should all use Heroine's version 4.x? If that's not the case, for those of us running straight Debian, is deb-multimedia still the recommended place to get the packages? Thanks for the clarification. The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. What your problem is is that the CV is not being compiled from source file for Ubuntu. On the other hand, I am using openSUSE and I have the very latest Cinelerra CV - released only a day or so ago - readily available (and installed). BC I am using Ubuntu 12.10 and would not want to change distributions simply to be able to use Cinelerra-CV. I am getting the impression that the CV version is not being kept up to date for Ubuntu, and perhaps not for many other distributions such as Debian. Is that correct? If so, I guess I will have to stick with the HW Version. Murray
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Due to the confusion over the two repositories, I am updating the cinelerra-cv ppa with the latest builds (currently building, available in a few hours): A: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/cinelerra-cv The only difference (to the user) between these builds and those in the main PPA B: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa is the different name for cinelerra (now cinelerra-cv). I would appreciate if anybody interested could test these new builds. A few precautions: 1. Uninstall the current cinelerra you might have from the PPA. 2. Disable the main PPA (B, above). 3. Enable the cinelerra-ppa PPA (A, above) 4. Install cinelerra-cv. If no issues are found, I will port those builds to the official PPA, so that the only available build will be, cinelerra-cv. Thanks, Nicola From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:04:36 -0800 Furthermore, as suggested, if one prefers, compiling cinelerra (either version, really) it's simple enough. From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:03:13 -0800 BC Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for Ubuntu, in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The current binaries are based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent patches. I am not sure why you keep saying that CV is not compiled from source for CV. I have no interest nor motivation to make another ppa for the HW, maybe someone else can take that task. When time will allow me, I will try to modify the package names to reflect that what is in the PPA really is cinelerra-cv. NF From: wmstr...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:21:42 -0800 From: Basil Chupin blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 5:02:17 AM Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote: On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. Does this apply to everyone? Like is the CV version itself no longer maintained and we should all use Heroine's version 4.x? If that's not the case, for those of us running straight Debian, is deb-multimedia still the recommended place to get the packages? Thanks for the clarification. The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. What your problem is is that the CV is not being compiled from source file for Ubuntu. On the other hand, I am using openSUSE and I have the very latest Cinelerra CV - released only a day or so ago - readily available (and installed). BC I am using Ubuntu 12.10 and would not want to change distributions simply to be able to use Cinelerra-CV. I am getting the impression that the CV version is not being kept up to date for Ubuntu, and perhaps not for many other distributions such as Debian. Is that correct? If so, I guess I will have to stick with the HW Version. Murray
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
On 11/05/2012 02:02 PM, Basil Chupin wrote: The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. Okay, so we needn't worry about the different version numbers then? So Cin-CV built on 7 Aug 2012, though version 2.2 still has many/most features as Cin-HV 4.4 built on 12 Sept 2012? (The cinelerra.org home page doesn't have any posts since 2011.) Sincerely, Sean M. Pappalardo smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
På Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:02:17 +0100, skrev Basil Chupin blchu...@iinet.net.au: The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. Nope. CinHV used to be "upstream", which CinCV _followed_,by merging with CinHV's releases. CinHV has progressed fastermost of the time between those merges.And CinCV broke off with upstream after CinHV 4.0, becausemerging became hard. Since then CinCV must have fallenbehind quite considerably, though I have not tested CinHVlately to see how big the difference is.-- Herman Robak
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Ciao! And CinCV broke off with upstream after CinHV 4.0, because merging became hard. Since then CinCV must have fallen behind quite considerably, I don't think so. They diverged. CV has some feature that are not in HV and HV has some features that are not on CV. A clear distinction on the website is needed. Anyone here is using both Cinelerras? Can we make a collection of differences? Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
On 06/11/12 03:03, Nicola Ferralis wrote: BC Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for Ubuntu, in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The current binaries are based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent patches. I am not sure why you keep saying that CV is not compiled from source for CV. I have no interest nor motivation to make another ppa for the HW, maybe someone else can take that task. When time will allow me, I will try to modify the package names to reflect that what is in the PPA really is cinelerra-cv. NF Ummm, what would you compile it from other than the source? :-) I looked at this- http://cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.php which shows that Cinelerra CV has not been compiled for Ubuntu for quite some time - but I got my copy updated only a few hours ago with the latest update release made available only some 4 hours ago (at the time of writing this). BC -- Using openSUSE 12.2 x86_64 KDE 4.9.2 kernel 3.6.5-1 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair Vengeance RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
On 06/11/12 02:21, Murray Strome wrote: *From:* Basil Chupin blchu...@iinet.net.au *To:* cinelerra@skolelinux.no *Sent:* Monday, November 5, 2012 5:02:17 AM *Subject:* Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote: On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa https://launchpad.net/%7Ecinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. Does this apply to everyone? Like is the CV version itself no longer maintained and we should all use Heroine's version 4.x? If that's not the case, for those of us running straight Debian, is deb-multimedia still the recommended place to get the packages? Thanks for the clarification. The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. What your problem is is that the CV is not being compiled from source file for Ubuntu. On the other hand, I am using openSUSE and I have the very latest Cinelerra CV - released only a day or so ago - readily available (and installed). BC I am using Ubuntu 12.10 and would not want to change distributions simply to be able to use Cinelerra-CV. I am getting the impression that the CV version is not being kept up to date for Ubuntu, and perhaps not for many other distributions such as Debian. Is that correct? If so, I guess I will have to stick with the HW Version. Murray Which distro you use is not for me to say but I have tried (almost) all of them and there is nothing as good as... :-) . I looked here to see which versions were available for which distro- http://cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.php Whether this list is up to date, I don' know. BC -- Using openSUSE 12.2 x86_64 KDE 4.9.2 kernel 3.6.5-1 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair Vengeance RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Basil, If you refer to packages in in the official Ubuntu repositories, well you won't find any. That is why I made the PPA in first place. Regarding cinelerra.org, I don't really know what is in the official website other than links to various sources. All I know is that the PPA offers builds with the current version of the source for git (with patches of 09/24/2012). In fact these binaries were compiled on the 10/10/2012. Now, you may have a source that is newer than the official git in cinelerra.org. All I know is that the last update on it was on 09/24. The next time an the git tree is update, you will find a new build for Ubuntu in the PPA. This obviously doesn't prevent people from compiling their own packages. Regards, Nicola From: blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:20:16 +1100 On 06/11/12 03:03, Nicola Ferralis wrote: BC Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for Ubuntu, in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The current binaries are based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent patches. I am not sure why you keep saying that CV is not compiled from source for CV. I have no interest nor motivation to make another ppa for the HW, maybe someone else can take that task. When time will allow me, I will try to modify the package names to reflect that what is in the PPA really is cinelerra-cv. NF Ummm, what would you compile it from other than the source? :-) I looked at this- http://cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.php which shows that Cinelerra CV has not been compiled for Ubuntu for quite some time - but I got my copy updated only a few hours ago with the latest update release made available only some 4 hours ago (at the time of writing this). BC -- Using openSUSE 12.2 x86_64 KDE 4.9.2 kernel 3.6.5-1 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair Vengeance RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU
[CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
After reading the Handy Tutorial, Install Cinelerra in Ubuntu 12.04 12.10http://handytutorial.com/install-cinelerra-in-ubuntu-12-04-12-10/ I decided that it would be best to install the CV version on my newly installed Ubuntu 12.10.However, when I tried to do so following the instructions in the tutorial, I get the following error message:Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you haverequested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstabledistribution that some required packages have not yet been createdor been moved out of Incoming.The following information may help resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cinelerra-cv : Depends: libguicast1 (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libmpeg3cine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libquicktimecine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installedE: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.--I then decided to just install the other version (sudo apt-get install cinelerra) after adding that repository. It seemed to install OK. Which version is recommended? Of course, if I want to use it, my only option is the non-CV version. Is this problem a bug which needs to be fixed, or is there something different that I should be doing? Thanks for any suggestions/advice.
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
The PPA install binary has been prepared for 12.04 (correct me if I am wrong). Haven't heard of anyone compiling under 12.10 yet, and hence overcoming any issues likely to occur. Will let the more technical boffins on this distribution list expand further... BTW, I'm not planning to upgrade my 12.04 at the moment. On 04/11/12 11:26, Murray Strome wrote: After reading the Handy Tutorial, Install Cinelerra in Ubuntu 12.04 12.10 http://handytutorial.com/install-cinelerra-in-ubuntu-12-04-12-10/ I decided that it would be best to install the CV version on my newly installed Ubuntu 12.10. However, when I tried to do so following the instructions in the tutorial, I get the following error message: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cinelerra-cv : Depends: libguicast1 (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libmpeg3cine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libquicktimecine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- I then decided to just install the other version (sudo apt-get install cinelerra) after adding that repository. It seemed to install OK. Which version is recommended? Of course, if I want to use it, my only option is the non-CV version. Is this problem a bug which needs to be fixed, or is there something different that I should be doing? Thanks for any suggestions/advice.
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
The official, maintained and up-to-date PPA for cinelerra is, well, cinelerra (not cinelerra-cv): https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. From a binary perspective, both PPA come from the same source, i.e. the community version of cinelerra. So I strongly recommend to use the one provided in the link above. Current packages in the cinelerra PPA ara available for ubuntu releases from Hardy (8.04) to Quantal (12.10). As I maintain the PPA, please let me know if you have any question/comment/bug to report. Nicola From: bod...@netspace.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:59:25 +1100 The PPA install binary has been prepared for 12.04 (correct me if I am wrong). Haven't heard of anyone compiling under 12.10 yet, and hence overcoming any issues likely to occur. Will let the more technical boffins on this distribution list expand further... BTW, I'm not planning to upgrade my 12.04 at the moment. On 04/11/12 11:26, Murray Strome wrote: After reading the Handy Tutorial, Install Cinelerra in Ubuntu 12.04 12.10 http://handytutorial.com/install-cinelerra-in-ubuntu-12-04-12-10/ I decided that it would be best to install the CV version on my newly installed Ubuntu 12.10. However, when I tried to do so following the instructions in the tutorial, I get the following error message: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cinelerra-cv : Depends: libguicast1 (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libmpeg3cine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libquicktimecine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- I then decided to just install the other version (sudo apt-get install cinelerra) after adding that repository. It seemed to install OK. Which version is recommended? Of course, if I want to use it, my only option is the non-CV version. Is this problem a bug which needs to be fixed, or is there something different that I should be doing? Thanks for any suggestions/advice.
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
PPA binaries are available for 12.04. I will start preparing packages for 13.04 fairly soon. From: bod...@netspace.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:59:25 +1100 The PPA install binary has been prepared for 12.04 (correct me if I am wrong). Haven't heard of anyone compiling under 12.10 yet, and hence overcoming any issues likely to occur. Will let the more technical boffins on this distribution list expand further... BTW, I'm not planning to upgrade my 12.04 at the moment. On 04/11/12 11:26, Murray Strome wrote: After reading the Handy Tutorial, Install Cinelerra in Ubuntu 12.04 12.10 http://handytutorial.com/install-cinelerra-in-ubuntu-12-04-12-10/ I decided that it would be best to install the CV version on my newly installed Ubuntu 12.10. However, when I tried to do so following the instructions in the tutorial, I get the following error message: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cinelerra-cv : Depends: libguicast1 (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libmpeg3cine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libquicktimecine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- I then decided to just install the other version (sudo apt-get install cinelerra) after adding that repository. It seemed to install OK. Which version is recommended? Of course, if I want to use it, my only option is the non-CV version. Is this problem a bug which needs to be fixed, or is there something different that I should be doing? Thanks for any suggestions/advice.
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
I just uploaded the new source for Raring (13.04). Binaries will be available for it in the next few hours in the Cinelerra ppa. From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 18:30:00 -0700 PPA binaries are available for 12.04. I will start preparing packages for 13.04 fairly soon. From: bod...@netspace.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:59:25 +1100 The PPA install binary has been prepared for 12.04 (correct me if I am wrong). Haven't heard of anyone compiling under 12.10 yet, and hence overcoming any issues likely to occur. Will let the more technical boffins on this distribution list expand further... BTW, I'm not planning to upgrade my 12.04 at the moment. On 04/11/12 11:26, Murray Strome wrote: After reading the Handy Tutorial, Install Cinelerra in Ubuntu 12.04 12.10 http://handytutorial.com/install-cinelerra-in-ubuntu-12-04-12-10/ I decided that it would be best to install the CV version on my newly installed Ubuntu 12.10. However, when I tried to do so following the instructions in the tutorial, I get the following error message: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cinelerra-cv : Depends: libguicast1 (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libmpeg3cine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libquicktimecine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- I then decided to just install the other version (sudo apt-get install cinelerra) after adding that repository. It seemed to install OK. Which version is recommended? Of course, if I want to use it, my only option is the non-CV version. Is this problem a bug which needs to be fixed, or is there something different that I should be doing? Thanks for any suggestions/advice.
