subject:"Re\: \[DISCUSS\] \- SVN to Gitbox"

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Mark Struberg

I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss 
those separate without having any pressure.
Wdyt?

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon :
> 
> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
> 
> regards,
> 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org 
> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>> +1 to have one repo per spec
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org 
>> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>>> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
>>> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do one 
>>> repo per atomic release.
>>> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or work 
>>> with infra to bulk migrate it).
>>> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
>>> 
>>> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
>>> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;))
>>> 
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>>>  | Old Blog 
>>>  | Github 
>>>  | LinkedIn 
>>>  | Book 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre >> > a écrit :
>>> Hi Mark,
>>> 
>>> I guess you mean for the release ? 
>>> 
>>> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s 
>>> what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>>> 
>>> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less 
>>> convenient anyway).
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
>>> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg >> > > a écrit :
>>> > 
>>> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git repo, 
>>> > isn't?
>>> > 
>>> > LieGrue,
>>> > strub
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org 
>>> >> :
>>> >> 
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >> 
>>> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
>>> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> I think we can start with this projects:
>>> >> 
>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/ 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/ 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/ 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
>>> >> 
>>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
>>> >> 
>>> >> regards,
>>> >> 
>>> >> -- 
>>> >> François
>>> >> fpa...@apache.org 
>>> >> 
>>> > 
>>>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Francois Papon

Ok, understand

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 12/05/2021 à 09:53, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
> let's do a bulk vote for all but spec then a discuss thread dedicated
> to specs if some disagree to have one repo per spec
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
>
>
> Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 09:49, Francois Papon
> mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>> a
> écrit :
>
> You mean having a vote per spec repository?
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org 
>
> Le 12/05/2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit :
>> I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And
>> then discuss those separate without having any pressure.
>> Wdyt?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon
>>> >> >:
>>>
>>> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> François
>>> fpa...@apache.org 
>>> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :

 +1 to have one repo per spec

 regards,

 François
 fpa...@apache.org 
 Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to
> say we do one repo per atomic release.
> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can
> automate it or work with infra to bulk migrate it).
> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
>
> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved
> to that ;))
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
> 
>
>
> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre
> mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I guess you mean for the release ?
>
> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a
> single repo (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>
> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo
> per spec (less convenient anyway).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  > a écrit :
> >
> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec
> as own git repo, isn't?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org
> :
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of
> our project
> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> >>
> >>
> >> I think we can start with this projects:
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> 
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> 
> >>
> >> -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> 
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> 
> >>
> >>
> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> >>
> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> 
> >>
> >>
> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you
> want to move.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> --
> >> François
> >> fpa...@apache.org 
> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau

let's do a bulk vote for all but spec then a discuss thread dedicated to
specs if some disagree to have one repo per spec


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 09:49, Francois Papon 
a écrit :

> You mean having a vote per spec repository?
>
> regards,
>
> Françoisfpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 12/05/2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit :
>
> I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss
> those separate without having any pressure.
> Wdyt?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon <
> francois.pa...@openobject.fr>:
>
> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
>
> regards,
>
> Françoisfpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>
> +1 to have one repo per spec
>
> regards,
>
> Françoisfpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>
> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do
> one repo per atomic release.
> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or
> work with infra to bulk migrate it).
> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
>
> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;))
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
>
>
> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I guess you mean for the release ?
>>
>> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s
>> what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>>
>> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less
>> convenient anyway).
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
>> >
>> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git
>> repo, isn't?
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> >
>> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
>> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I think we can start with this projects:
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
>> >>
>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
>> >>
>> >> regards,
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> François
>> >> fpa...@apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Francois Papon

You mean having a vote per spec repository?

regards,

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 12/05/2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit :
> I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then
> discuss those separate without having any pressure.
> Wdyt?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon
>> mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>>:
>>
>> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org
>> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>>>
>>> +1 to have one repo per spec
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> François
>>> fpa...@apache.org
>>> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
 Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
 The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say
 we do one repo per atomic release.
 For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it
 or work with infra to bulk migrate it).
 Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:

 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to
 that ;))

 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau  |  Blog
  | Old Blog
  | Github
  | LinkedIn
  | Book
 


 Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre >>> > a écrit :

 Hi Mark,

 I guess you mean for the release ?

 If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single
 repo (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix).

 But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per
 spec (less convenient anyway).

 Regards
 JB

 > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg >>> > a écrit :
 >
 > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as
 own git repo, isn't?
 >
 > LieGrue,
 > strub
 >
 >
 >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org
 :
 >>
 >> Hi,
 >>
 >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our
 project
 >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
 >>
 >>
 >> I think we can start with this projects:
 >>
 >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
 
 >>
 >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
 
 >>
 >> -
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
 
 >>
 >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
 
 >>
 >>
 >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
 >>
 >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
 
 >>
 >>
 >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want
 to move.
 >>
 >> regards,
 >>
 >> --
 >> François
 >> fpa...@apache.org 
 >>
 >

>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread JB Onofré

It makes sense to me. 

Regards 
JB

> Le 12 mai 2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss 
> those separate without having any pressure.
> Wdyt?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
>> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon :
>> 
>> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org
>> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>>> +1 to have one repo per spec
>>> 
>>> regards,
>>> 
>>> François
>>> fpa...@apache.org
>>> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
 Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
 The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do 
 one repo per atomic release.
 For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or 
 work with infra to bulk migrate it).
 Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
 
 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;))
 
 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
 
 
 Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a 
 écrit :
> Hi Mark,
> 
> I guess you mean for the release ? 
> 
> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s 
> what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
> 
> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less 
> convenient anyway).
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> > 
> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git 
> > repo, isn't?
> > 
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> > 
> > 
> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I think we can start with this projects:
> >> 
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> >> 
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> >> 
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> >> 
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> >> 
> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
> >> 
> >> regards,
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> François
> >> fpa...@apache.org
> >> 
> > 
> 
>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Francois Papon

Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!

regards,

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>
> +1 to have one repo per spec
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
>> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we
>> do one repo per atomic release.
>> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it
>> or work with infra to bulk migrate it).
>> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
>>
>> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
>> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to
>> that ;))
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  | Old Blog
>>  | Github
>>  | LinkedIn
>>  | Book
>> 
>>
>>
>> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre > > a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I guess you mean for the release ?
>>
>> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single
>> repo (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>>
>> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec
>> (less convenient anyway).
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg > > a écrit :
>> >
>> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own
>> git repo, isn't?
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> >
>> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org
>> :
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our
>> project
>> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I think we can start with this projects:
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
>> 
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
>> 
>> >>
>> >> -
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
>> 
>> >>
>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
>> 
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
>> >>
>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
>> 
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to
>> move.
>> >>
>> >> regards,
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> François
>> >> fpa...@apache.org 
>> >>
>> >
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Francois Papon

+1 to have one repo per spec

regards,

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we
> do one repo per atomic release.
> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or
> work with infra to bulk migrate it).
> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
>
> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;))
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
>
>
> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  > a écrit :
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I guess you mean for the release ?
>
> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single
> repo (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>
> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec
> (less convenient anyway).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  > a écrit :
> >
> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own
> git repo, isn't?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org
> :
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> >>
> >>
> >> I think we can start with this projects:
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> 
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> 
> >>
> >> -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> 
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> 
> >>
> >>
> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> >>
> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> 
> >>
> >>
> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to
> move.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> --
> >> François
> >> fpa...@apache.org 
> >>
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-11 Thread Mark Struberg

specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git repo, isn't?

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> 
> 
> I think we can start with this projects:
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> 
> 
> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> 
> 
> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
> 
> regards,
> 
> -- 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-11 Thread Raymond Augé

+1

Ray

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 9:15 AM Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:

> > 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
>
> I can only give +1 to this point ;)
>
>
> Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2021, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> > Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
> > The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we
> > do one repo per atomic release.
> > For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it
> > or work with infra to bulk migrate it).
> > Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
> >
> > 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
> > 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to
> > that ;))
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
> >
> >
> > Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> > écrit :
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > I guess you mean for the release ?
> > >
> > > If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo
> > > (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
> > >
> > > But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec
> > > (less convenient anyway).
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  a écrit
> > > :
> > > >
> > > > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own
> > > git repo, isn't?
> > > >
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our
> > > project
> > > >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I think we can start with this projects:
> > > >>
> > > >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> > > >>
> > > >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> > > >>
> > > >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> > > >>
> > > >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> > > >>
> > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to
> > > move.
> > > >>
> > > >> regards,
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> François
> > > >> fpa...@apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> --
> Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
> Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics
>
> Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
> Max-Planck-Str. 39
> D-74081 Heilbronn
> phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar)
> mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de
> web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/
>


-- 
*Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay)
OSGi Fellow

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-11 Thread Zowalla, Richard

> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)

I can only give +1 to this point ;)


Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2021, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we
> do one repo per atomic release.
> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it
> or work with infra to bulk migrate it).
> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
> 
> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to
> that ;))
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
> 
> 
> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> écrit :
> > Hi Mark,
> > 
> > I guess you mean for the release ? 
> > 
> > If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo
> > (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
> > 
> > But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec
> > (less convenient anyway).
> > 
> > Regards
> > JB
> > 
> > > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  a écrit
> > :
> > > 
> > > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own
> > git repo, isn't?
> > > 
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > > 
> > > 
> > >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
> > >> 
> > >> Hi,
> > >> 
> > >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our
> > project
> > >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> I think we can start with this projects:
> > >> 
> > >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> > >> 
> > >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> > >> 
> > >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> > >> 
> > >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> > >> 
> > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to
> > move.
> > >> 
> > >> regards,
> > >> 
> > >> -- 
> > >> François
> > >> fpa...@apache.org
> > >> 
> > > 
> > 
-- 
Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics

Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
Max-Planck-Str. 39 
D-74081 Heilbronn 
phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar)
mail: richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de
web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau

Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do one
repo per atomic release.
For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or work
with infra to bulk migrate it).
Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:

1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;))

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
écrit :

> Hi Mark,
>
> I guess you mean for the release ?
>
> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s
> what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>
> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less
> convenient anyway).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> >
> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git
> repo, isn't?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
> >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> >>
> >>
> >> I think we can start with this projects:
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> >>
> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> >>
> >>
> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> >>
> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> >>
> >>
> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> --
> >> François
> >> fpa...@apache.org
> >>
> >
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre

Hi Mark,

I guess you mean for the release ? 

If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s what 
I’m doing at ServiceMix).

But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less 
convenient anyway).

Regards
JB

> Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git repo, 
> isn't?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
>> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
>> repositories from svn to gitbox.
>> 
>> 
>> I think we can start with this projects:
>> 
>> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
>> 
>> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
>> 
>> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
>> 
>> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
>> 
>> 
>> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
>> 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
>> 
>> 
>> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> -- 
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org
>> 
>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre

Hi,

No objection from my side.

Regards
JB

> Le 11 mai 2021 à 05:39, fpa...@apache.org a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> 
> 
> I think we can start with this projects:
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> 
> 
> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> 
> 
> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
> 
> regards,
> 
> -- 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau

+1

Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 05:43, JB Onofré  a écrit :

> Hi
>
> No objection from my side.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 05:40, fpa...@apache.org a écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
> > repositories from svn to gitbox.
> >
> >
> > I think we can start with this projects:
> >
> > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> >
> > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> >
> > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> >
> > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> >
> >
> > Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> >
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> >
> >
> > Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > --
> > François
> > fpa...@apache.org
> >
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-10 Thread JB Onofré

Hi

No objection from my side. 

Regards 
JB

> Le 11 mai 2021 à 05:40, fpa...@apache.org a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> 
> 
> I think we can start with this projects:
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> 
> 
> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> 
> 
> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
> 
> regards,
> 
> -- 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
>

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

15 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information