Re: mod_ssl and SSLPolicy
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:39:08PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Thanks for all the input. What I see is consensus about the SSLPolicy change: > > 'SSLPolicy' -> stay as is > ' ' > (I prefer the verb above the noun here since mod_ssl uses verbs in other > config name.) > Looks better that way to me too. vh Mads Toftum -- http://flickr.com/photos/q42/
Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain
On 12/04/2017 08:16 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: Not much input regarding this naming change. Personally, I like to keep ' Sounds good to me.
Re: mod_ssl and SSLPolicy
On 12/04/2017 07:56 AM, Daniel wrote: Sounds like a good change if anyone asks me. :) 2017-12-04 13:39 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : Thanks for all the input. What I see is consensus about the SSLPolicy change: 'SSLPolicy' -> stay as is ' ' Sounds fine to me. I will also respect your decision if you choose not to make this change, as I said elsewhere in the thread. Cheers, Stefan Am 03.12.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Rainer Jung : Am 28.11.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Rich Bowen: As one of the folks that answers questions on IRC, I would like to object to the existence of SSLPolicy and . I think it's unwise to have two directives with the same name, for reasons of end-user support. As long as it's still only in trunk, we still have an opportunity to avert user confusion. I request that one of these be renamed. (No, I'm not suggesting specific names. I suck at naming things.) What about keeping the simple SSLPolicy directive (the name of the policy to apply) and renaming the container directive from to . One other solution would by keeping and rewnaming the simple directive to SSLPolicyApply. Regards, Rainer
Re: mod_ssl and SSLPolicy
On 11/29/2017 04:23 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: Having slept a night over this and the mod_md config change request, I say this leaves me somewhat sour. A request for an unspecified change by someone important in this project is basically blocking any progress for me. I am sure that was not your intention, but I feel the current choice of naming good, because that is why they are there, and I am not convinced that any alternative I come up with falls on fertile ground. That could lead to a groundhog day experience with me doing the work and others saying 'nah!' afterwards. I'm very sorry, that was not at all my intention. I am merely trying to avoid user confusion. If you disagree, just say so, and I'll drop it. This change is obviously important to you, so please lead a consensus on how it should be changed. The code change I will then do afterwards if no one else feels like it. Cheers, Stefan Am 28.11.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Rich Bowen : As one of the folks that answers questions on IRC, I would like to object to the existence of SSLPolicy and . I think it's unwise to have two directives with the same name, for reasons of end-user support. As long as it's still only in trunk, we still have an opportunity to avert user confusion. I request that one of these be renamed. (No, I'm not suggesting specific names. I suck at naming things.) Thanks. --Rich
mod_md and ManagedDomain
Not much input regarding this naming change. Personally, I like to keep '
Re: mod_ssl and SSLPolicy
Sounds like a good change if anyone asks me. :) 2017-12-04 13:39 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : > Thanks for all the input. What I see is consensus about the SSLPolicy change: > > 'SSLPolicy' -> stay as is > ' ' > (I prefer the verb above the noun here since mod_ssl uses verbs in other > config name.) > > If no one objects, I will go for this change in the next days. > > Cheers, > > Stefan > >> Am 03.12.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Rainer Jung : >> >> Am 28.11.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Rich Bowen: >>> As one of the folks that answers questions on IRC, I would like to object >>> to the existence of SSLPolicy and . I think it's unwise to have >>> two directives with the same name, for reasons of end-user support. >>> As long as it's still only in trunk, we still have an opportunity to avert >>> user confusion. >>> I request that one of these be renamed. (No, I'm not suggesting specific >>> names. I suck at naming things.) >> >> What about keeping the simple SSLPolicy directive (the name of the policy to >> apply) and renaming the container directive from to >> . >> >> One other solution would by keeping and rewnaming the simple >> directive to SSLPolicyApply. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer > -- Daniel Ferradal IT Specialist email dferradal at gmail.com linkedin es.linkedin.com/in/danielferradal
Re: mod_ssl and SSLPolicy
Thanks for all the input. What I see is consensus about the SSLPolicy change: 'SSLPolicy' -> stay as is ' ' Am 03.12.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Rainer Jung : > > Am 28.11.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Rich Bowen: >> As one of the folks that answers questions on IRC, I would like to object to >> the existence of SSLPolicy and . I think it's unwise to have two >> directives with the same name, for reasons of end-user support. >> As long as it's still only in trunk, we still have an opportunity to avert >> user confusion. >> I request that one of these be renamed. (No, I'm not suggesting specific >> names. I suck at naming things.) > > What about keeping the simple SSLPolicy directive (the name of the policy to > apply) and renaming the container directive from to > . > > One other solution would by keeping and rewnaming the simple > directive to SSLPolicyApply. > > Regards, > > Rainer