Re: Quantity UOM in Supplier Product
Hello Pierre, A JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9580> is created for further tracking the improvements. Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:22 AM, pierre <pierre.gau...@nereide.biz> wrote: > Hi all, > We made something very similar. > > We use this information of purchasing orders until the reception. > > I am going to supply a patch and more details of what we made in the > course of September (at present I am on holidays) > > Is there Jira to propose a patch? > > Many thanks > > Pierre > > On 14/08/2017 10:43, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Thanks Scott, >> >> Inline too >> >> >> Le 14/08/2017 à 08:20, Scott Gray a écrit : >> >>> Hi Vaibhav, >>> >>> Comments inline. >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> On 11 August 2017 at 02:55, Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> Thank you so much Scott for sharing these details, indeed they are really >>>> helpful. >>>> Kindly see my comments inline. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Scott Gray < >>>> scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Vaibhav, >>>>> >>>>> It's a good question and mailing list archives (that are available) >>>>> don't >>>>> really answer the question clearly. At the moment as far as I can >>>>> tell, >>>>> the quantityUomId and unitsIncluded field do nothing, they're display >>>>> >>>> only. >>>> >>>>> I think SupplierProduct.unitsIncluded is the same as >>>>> Product.quantityIncluded, the field types are the same and the names >>>>> >>>> imply >>>> >>>>> similar things. I actually think unitsIncluded is a better name than >>>>> quantityIncluded which is confusing because the number doesn't relate >>>>> to >>>>> any quantity fields we normally use. >>>>> >>>>>IMO, quantityIncluded name can be better choice, because as my >>>> undestanding >>>> unitsIncluded is used to define units of product (like each, pack etc.) >>>> but we may have products in various UOMs like (weight UOM, Liquid/Volume >>>> UOM e.t.c.) >>>> >>>> The confusing part is that quantityIncluded implies it has some >>> relation to >>> the OrderItem.quantity being ordered but that isn't the case. I see your >>> point though. Perhaps a name like uomQuantityIncluded would make more >>> sense. >>> >> +1 for uomQuantityIncluded, too late to change? >> >> >>> >>>> From the Product entity definition we have this explanation of the >>>>> >>>> fields: >>>> >>>>> "If you have a six-pack of 12oz soda cans you would have >>>>> quantityIncluded=12, quantityUomId=oz, piecesIncluded=6" >>>>> >>>>> piecesIncluded is missing from ProductSupplier but I think the >>>>> definition >>>>> for quantityIncluded/unitsIncluded can stand without it. >>>>> >>>>> As per my understanding the quantityIncluded defines the quantity >>>> included >>>> in the respective quantityUomId and we do not need piecesIncluded here. >>>> >>>> The need is really based on the real-world use case. piecesIncluded >>> could >>> have a place in a purchasing use case in the same way it does for a >>> selling >>> use case. >>> >> +1 for putting in piecesIncludedin case of purchase also. >> >> >>> >>> "If you have a six-pack of 12oz soda cans you would have >>>>>> >>>>> quantityIncluded=6 quantityUomId=pack" >>>> >>>> As per my understanding, I think, "oz" is a weightUomId and this should >>>> be >>>> managed at product level not at SupplierProduct. Please let me know your >>>> thoughts on this. >>>> >>>> The purpose of the Product.quantityUomId is to define how we choose to >>> describe our product. Likewise the SupplierProduct.quantityUomId defines >>> how the supplier describes their product. >>> >>> To extend my earlier use-case: If I am a house paint
Re: Quantity UOM in Supplier Product
Thank you so much Scott for sharing these details, indeed they are really helpful. Kindly see my comments inline. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Scott Gray <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hi Vaibhav, > > It's a good question and mailing list archives (that are available) don't > really answer the question clearly. At the moment as far as I can tell, > the quantityUomId and unitsIncluded field do nothing, they're display only. > > I think SupplierProduct.unitsIncluded is the same as > Product.quantityIncluded, the field types are the same and the names imply > similar things. I actually think unitsIncluded is a better name than > quantityIncluded which is confusing because the number doesn't relate to > any quantity fields we normally use. > IMO, quantityIncluded name can be better choice, because as my undestanding unitsIncluded is used to define units of product (like each, pack etc.) but we may have products in various UOMs like (weight UOM, Liquid/Volume UOM e.t.c.) > From the Product entity definition we have this explanation of the fields: > "If you have a six-pack of 12oz soda cans you would have > quantityIncluded=12, quantityUomId=oz, piecesIncluded=6" > > piecesIncluded is missing from ProductSupplier but I think the definition > for quantityIncluded/unitsIncluded can stand without it. > As per my understanding the quantityIncluded defines the quantity included in the respective quantityUomId and we do not need piecesIncluded here. >> "If you have a six-pack of 12oz soda cans you would have quantityIncluded=6 quantityUomId=pack" As per my understanding, I think, "oz" is a weightUomId and this should be managed at product level not at SupplierProduct. Please let me know your thoughts on this. > So I think what we can conclude from this detail is that these fields are > informative and not functional, and they shouldn't have any bearing against > other fields such as lastPrice. > Agreed! > I think there could be room for making use of the fields, an example: > Let's say you are a house painter and you need to order 12 litres of paint > for a job. The supplier has two products available, 2 litre tins @ $10 and > 4 litre tins @ $15: > minimumOrderQuantity="1" orderQtyIncrements="1"/> > minimumOrderQuantity="1" orderQtyIncrements="1"/> > > So you tell your amazing OFBiz system that you'd like to order 12 liters of > paint, OFBiz will then look at your SupplierProduct records and determine > which record gives you the best price and fits within the supplier's > purchasing rules (i.e. you can't order half a tin of paint). OFBiz > ultimately puts the selection into OrderItem.supplierProductId and sets the > unitPrice accordingly. As a second function, OrderItem.supplierProductId > can then also serve to correctly format the PO that the supplier receives > so that instead of seeing: > "Send me 12 litres of paint @ $3.75/litre please" > they could instead see: > "Send me 3 units of 4 litre paint @ $15/unit please" > It wouldn't alter what we see in the OrderItem record, but it could be used > for information the supplier receives and perhaps also for shipment receipt > verification (if you wanted 4L tins and they sent you 2L tins, maybe that's > an issue that needs to be dealt with). > It's a great use case, what I have concluded from this is, We should use quantityUomId and quantityIncluded fields, Just additional thought, if we use these fields then these fileds should be the part of OrderItem entity as well. This will help in maintaining the information at order item level. Please correct me on this, if I understand anything incorrectly. > I hope that helps. I've made a few assumptions here so if anyone thinks > Indeed very helpful, thanks so much :) I'm incorrect please speak up. > > Regards > Scott > > > > > > On 9 August 2017 at 23:31, Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com> > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > There are two fields, *quant**ityUomId* and *unitsIncluded* in > > SupplierProduct entity. > > Can someone please elaborate the use of these fields? > > > > After creating a record of SupplierProduct with *quantityUomId*="box" and > > *unitsIncluded*="10", created a purchase order but didn't notice any > > change. > > > > How are these fields entertained in the purchase order? > > > > Thanks & Regards > > Vaibhav Jain > > Hotwax Systems, > > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com > > >
Re: Keep deleteProductionRunRoutingTask?
Hello Jacques, Just for easy reference >>Please give your opinion on OFBIZ-9568 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9568>before I continue on OFBIZ-9185 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9185> Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Please give your opinion on OFBIZ-9568 before I continue on OFBIZ-9185 > > Thanks > > Jacques > >
Re: [Proposal] - Leverage the CMS capability for Product Store's Email
+1 Swapnil
Thanks & Regards
Vaibhav Jain
Hotwax Systems,
vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Swapnil Mane <
swapnil.m...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> Hello Devs,
>
> While looking into the support of email templates for Product Store, we
> found it is managed by screens.
>
> Like for Order Completion
>
> bodyScreenLocation="component://ecommerce/widget/EmailOrderScreens.xml#
> OrderCompleteNotice"
> emailType="PRDS_ODR_COMPLETE" fromAddress="ofbizt...@example.com"
> productStoreId="9000" subject="OFBiz Demo - Your Order Is Complete
> #${orderId}"/>
>
> Here you can see, we are having dependency on screens (i.e. templates
> defined in file system)
> Due to this, the user is unable to edit the email template on the fly.
>
> We can enhance this mechanism by making the template as content driven.
> Here is the design plan,
>
> We can extend the ProductStoreEmailSetting entity by contentId field.
> While rendering email based on its type, if the contentId is present, this
> content will render, else system will look for bodyScreenLocation (our
> existing implementation)
>
> Using this we can leverage the CMS capability of the OFBiz.
> Right now if end user (client) wants to make any change in the email
> template, it required the changes in the file.
> If we manage this by content, the user can edit this on the fly with the
> help of CMS.
>
> All the inputs and suggestions are welcome!
>
>
> - Best Regards,
> Swapnil M Mane
> www.hotwaxsystems.com
> www.hotwax.co
>
Re: Quantity UOM in Supplier Product
Hello Scott, Thank you very much for your continuous efforts on this discussion.Please check comments inline On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Scott Gray <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hi Vaibhav, > > Comments inline. > > Regards > Scott > > On 11 August 2017 at 02:55, Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com> > wrote: > >> Thank you so much Scott for sharing these details, indeed they are really >> helpful. >> Kindly see my comments inline. >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Scott Gray <scott.g...@hotwaxsystems.com >> > >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Vaibhav, >> > >> > It's a good question and mailing list archives (that are available) >> don't >> > really answer the question clearly. At the moment as far as I can tell, >> > the quantityUomId and unitsIncluded field do nothing, they're display >> only. >> > >> > I think SupplierProduct.unitsIncluded is the same as >> > Product.quantityIncluded, the field types are the same and the names >> imply >> > similar things. I actually think unitsIncluded is a better name than >> > quantityIncluded which is confusing because the number doesn't relate to >> > any quantity fields we normally use. >> > >> >> IMO, quantityIncluded name can be better choice, because as my >> undestanding >> unitsIncluded is used to define units of product (like each, pack etc.) >> but we may have products in various UOMs like (weight UOM, Liquid/Volume >> UOM e.t.c.) >> > > The confusing part is that quantityIncluded implies it has some relation > to the OrderItem.quantity being ordered but that isn't the case. I see > your point though. Perhaps a name like uomQuantityIncluded would make more > sense. > Yes, fully agreed for the name *uomQuantityIncluded*. > > >> >> >> > From the Product entity definition we have this explanation of the >> fields: >> > "If you have a six-pack of 12oz soda cans you would have >> > quantityIncluded=12, quantityUomId=oz, piecesIncluded=6" >> > >> > piecesIncluded is missing from ProductSupplier but I think the >> definition >> > for quantityIncluded/unitsIncluded can stand without it. >> > >> >> As per my understanding the quantityIncluded defines the quantity included >> in the respective quantityUomId and we do not need piecesIncluded here. >> > > The need is really based on the real-world use case. piecesIncluded could > have a place in a purchasing use case in the same way it does for a selling > use case. > Okay got it, As I understand we need to introduce new field *piecesIncluded* in SupplierProduct entity. This will be just an informative field for supplier product. At the time of receive product value of SupplierProduct.*piecesIncluded* will be copied to Product.*piecesIncluded* which help in maintaining detailed information of product. Please correct me on this, if I understand anything wrong. > > >> >> >> "If you have a six-pack of 12oz soda cans you would have >> quantityIncluded=6 quantityUomId=pack" >> >> As per my understanding, I think, "oz" is a weightUomId and this should be >> managed at product level not at SupplierProduct. Please let me know your >> thoughts on this. >> > > The purpose of the Product.quantityUomId is to define how we choose to > describe our product. Likewise the SupplierProduct.quantityUomId defines > how the supplier describes their product. > Agreed! > > To extend my earlier use-case: If I am a house painter in NZ but I import > my paint from the US, then chances are I would be ordering from a supplier > who works in fluid ounces, US quarts or gallons. Despite that, I still > want to be able to sell paint locally by the litre. > Nice use case let me explain. As system is belongs to painter. So we need to define defaultProductUom(On which product UOM is managed in the system). In this case *defaultProductUom*="Litre". Paint is sell by a supplier and supplier is belongs to USA i.e. supplier product UOM might be Ounce/Gallon/Quarts. Now in supplier product entity *quantityUomId*="Ounce/Gallon/Quarts" *uomQunatityIncluded*="litres in Ounce/Gallon/Quarts". And inventory recieved will be *quantity***uomQuantityincluded*. > > >> > So I think what we can conclude from this detail is that these fields >> are >> > informative and not functional, and they shouldn't have any bearing >> against >> > other fields such as lastPrice. >> > >> >> Agreed! >> >>
Re: [Proposal] - Using CommonErrorUiLabels.xml for common UiLabels
Hello Pallavi, Yes, we can create error message UI labels in CommonErrorUiLabels.xml for the common errors (like City, Postal code etc). No need to create duplicate UI label for same error in every component. Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Pallavi Goyal <goyalpallav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Dev, > > While working on OFBIZ-7737 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7737> to improve service > level > error messages for missing required fields, I observed there are > many UiLabels for missing fields which are common throughout OFBiz such as > Postal Code, City, Order Id etc. > > So, should we proceed to put these common UiLabels in > CommonErrorUiLabels.xml file instead of making multiple component specific > copies in ErrorUiLabels.xml. > > Thanks and Regards > Pallavi Goyal >
Quantity UOM in Supplier Product
Hello all, There are two fields, *quant**ityUomId* and *unitsIncluded* in SupplierProduct entity. Can someone please elaborate the use of these fields? After creating a record of SupplierProduct with *quantityUomId*="box" and *unitsIncluded*="10", created a purchase order but didn't notice any change. How are these fields entertained in the purchase order? Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com
Re: Rule to deprecated a service
+1 Nicolas
Thanks & Regards
Vaibhav Jain
Hotwax Systems,
vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Suraj Khurana <
suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> +1 Nicolas.
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> *Suraj Khurana* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer
> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems
> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello with the thread https://lists.apache.org/
> thread.html/Zoz5yfpkrfcxts1
> > and the voluntary to have a good coherence on crud service name,
> >
> > I would be have your suggest to manage old name and deprecated process.
> >
> > I review the issue OFBIZ-9550 [1] that contains this problematic :
> >
> > - > + >
> > Currently I follow this process :
> >
> > * duplicate the service definition
> > * Rename the duplicate with the correct name
> > * Set "DEPRECATED : use ${new service} instead" in the service
> description
> > * implement on old service definition : return error("use ${new service}
> > instead") to help developer to correct their specific code.
> >
> > I image that we can create a generic code to return the error and change
> > the old service definition like this :
> >
> > > default-entity-name="MarketingCampaignPromo" engine="deprecated"
> > invoke="create" auth="true">
> > Deprecated please replace by
> > createMarketingCampaignPromo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > And deprecated engine return always error with the service description.
> >
> > After a new ofbiz stable branche creation, we remove all deprecated
> > service ?
> >
> > Any suggests, othet ideas, comments ?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9550
> >
> > --
> > logoNrd <https://nereide.fr/>
> > Nicolas Malin
> > The apache way <http://theapacheway.com/> : *Openness* Technical
> > decisions are made publicly
> > informat...@nereide.fr
> > 8 rue des Déportés 37000 TOURS, 02 47 50 30 54
> >
> > Apache OFBiz <http://ofbiz.apache.org/>|The Apache Way <
> > http://theapacheway.com/>|ofbiz-fr <http://www.ofbiz-fr.org/>|réseau LE
> <
> > http://www.libre-entreprise.org/>
> >
>
Re: Suggestions Request: OFBiz Business Process Reference Book/Guide
Thanks for the initiative Pranay: +1 I am looking forward into it. Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Sharan Foga <sharan.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great idea Pranay! (and big +1) > > Thanks > Sharan > > > On 19/08/17 06:24, Pranay Pandey wrote: > >> Hello Devs, >> >> This is something where I wanted to request your suggestions. I am >> planning >> to rename and restructure the documentation on OFBiz Wiki page- Business >> Process Stories and Use Cases Library >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/1gm8Ag>. >> >> The idea will still be the same i.e. to help OFBiz Evaluators. All the >> people who are more interested in written content to prove the >> implementation. Provide a robust process documentation that supports >> decision-makers to choose OFBiz over any other proprietary software. To >> help them take this content to a wider audience who take the decision for >> choosing a business automation software. >> >> I am planning to rename this page to: "*OFBiz Business Process Reference >> Book*". >> Then review and overhaul the overall content on this page to clarify the >> purpose of all the documents in this tree(Directory). >> >> Now restructure the child pages with new names with business significance >> i.e. the process names that industry people refer e.g. CRM, Product >> Information Management(PIM), Procurement, Fulfilment etc. >> >> Now every module page will have two child pages so the structure would be >> changed like this- >> >> - Catalog Management >> -- Product Information Management (PIM) >> --- PIM Process Overview (Content: Process Overview, Business Purpose, >> Level-1,2, and 3 Activity Diagrams as applicable to demonstrate the >> process >> flow) >> --- PIM User Stories, Use Cases and Test Cases (Content: Review, refine >> and >> add missing user stories, use cases, and test cases) >> -- Merchandising >> --- Merchandising Process Overview (Content: Process Overview, Business >> Purpose, Level-1,2, and 3 Activity Diagrams as applicable to demonstrate >> the process flow) >> --- Merchandising User Stories, Use Cases and Test Cases >> -- Store Management >> --- Store Management Process Overview >> --- Store Management User Stories, Use Cases and Test Cases >> ... >> ... >> ... >> >> I am planning to create a JIRA ticket with these details and would like to >> start from there with sub tasks. This way we'll be able to collaborate in >> this effort. >> >> How does that all sound to you? Please let me know your thoughts, >> feedback, >> and improvement suggestions for the mentioned effort. >> >> Kind regards, >> Pranay Pandey >> >> >
Re: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records
Hello Swapnil/James, There are many dependencies of inventory transfer in Business Requirements like: 1. In Inventory transfer generally, there is more than one product in any inventory transfer. 2. Inventory transfer should have an association with Shipment which is missing. 3. Inventory transfer should have an association with Accounting which is missing. 4. Tax should be calculated(Applicable in India after GST) on inventory transfer. 5. If the tax is exempted then need "Stock transferring" documentation. 6. Tracking of Transferred inventory. 7. Tracking of associated peoples(Picker, Packer, driver) with the respective transfer order. Most of the attribute of inventory transfer is belongs to Order management system. Hence we should have a flow to create a "Transfer Order" for inventory transfer. Inventory Transfer can be treated as "Receive product". Business does not have workflows to receive the product directly i.e. PO should be created to receive the product. If anyone wants to surpass the PO workflow and want to receive the product then "Receive product" is useful. Same for inventory transfer we should have a flow of transfer order and inventory transfer can be used like "Receive Product" workflow. Please share your thoughts Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Swapnil Shah < swapnil.s...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Yes James, > ITH should work. I would prefer to have ITH tightly coupled with > InventoryTransfer(IT) i.e. even in case of single item transfer create > corresponding entries in ITH and IT both to maintain data integrity. Also, > We can try tying up Inventory Transfer with Shipment through ITH itself or > a separate entity e.g., InventoryTransferShipment. > > Thanks & Regards, > Swapnil > > -Original Message- > From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 9:26 PM > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Subject: Re: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records > > Hi Swapnil, > > Another possible solution is to have an header entity, e.g. > InventoryTransferHeader (ITH), containing additional or common info > related to the group transfer. > For group transfer, ITH is created and each InventoryTransfer will contain > a FK to ITH. > For single transfer, ITH can be empty. > > Regards, > James Yong > > On 2017-10-14 18:59, Swapnil Shah <swapnil.s...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > Folks, > > One very frequent use case that we encounter is that any transfer > > request initiated from one facility to another is generally for > > multiple products as they all need to go in a single shipment against > > transfer request so as to be cost effective. > > > > Current schema has the limitation that any given inventory transfer > > can only be for single inventory item (and hence only one product). > > Would it make sense and be feasible if we enhance the existing design > > such that multiple products/inventory can be tied with a single > > transfer > > (InventoryTransferId) request (possibly by having InventoryTransferId > > + InventoryItemId as PK) and shipment is tied up with it as well. Of > > course by leaving a proper audit trail via InventoryItemDetail etc. > > > > Let's share any further thoughts or similar business cases and then we > > can try to support it if it is generic enough. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Swapnil > > > > -Original Message- > > From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org] > > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 9:36 PM > > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records > > > > Hi all, > > > > It is better to add InventoryTransferId column to Inventory Item > > Detail > > (IID) table so that we easily link the IID record to the Inventory > > Transfer table. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Regards, > > James Yong > > > > On 2017-10-13 23:18, "James Yong"<jamesy...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Suraj, > > > > > > Shouldn't the transfer detail be stored at Inventory Item Detail > table? > > > > > > Regards, > > > James Yong > > > > > > On 2017-10-13 16:44, Suraj Khurana <suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > While creating inventory transfers, a new inventory item is > > > > created and successfully gets updated after completing inventory > transfer. > > > > As per current imple
Re: Implementing GST tax in Ofbiz - CGST , SGST , IGST
Rajesh replies this on user mailing list. Thanks Vaibhav for the reply , Although we have been asked to move this discussion to dev ML . [ apologies for that ;-) ] bypassing HSN is just a temporary arrangement as our product line has a fixed HSN code , so we have keep the rate at flat 9% or 18%. The ability to have different tax rates for different Product Category already exists so it shall be best to bank upon it . (as you have already done it in the example you gave). >> >> As we know GST in India is based on ORIG_LOCATION and DEST_LOCATION >> and is currently it is the only tax. >> >> But in a general situation where you have "GST like" taxes and some other >> taxes >> also say "Education Cess" (now defunct,i think) there needs to be an >> option to >> >Thanks for the make me remeber about about "CESS". Yes we need to entertain >"CESS" as well. >> have custom logic association with different kind of taxes and was the >> concern which >> i had raised. > > Not able to get your point. Can you please elaborate? Governments of various GEOIDs are free to implement arbitrarily complex or simple tax regimes . So i was asking for categorization of taxes so that appropriate logic (based on local tax regime) can be applied to various "kinds" (category) of taxes. As a person who is adopting ofbiz for first time , my convenience would have been (1) ofbiz OOTB UI / Web Tools allowed me to create some Tax Categories (2) ofbiz OOTB UI / Web Tools allowed me to associate a TaxAuthority with one or more Tax Categories (3) write code in calcTax to provide appropriate treatment to TaxAuthority based on its Tax Category. hope i was able to convey. kind regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Vaibhav Jain < vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Moving discussion to DEV list > == > > Hello Rajesh/Everyone, > > GST(India) can be implemented in OFBiz as follow: > > After GST tax will apply on the basis of HSN code of product not on the > product directly. So we can associate HSN code with tax slab in > ProductCategoryRollup entity like > > parentProductCategoryId="TAX_SLAB" fromDate="2017-07-01 12:00:00.0" > sequenceNum="1"/> > > As we need to define tax slab, ProductCategory entity can be used to > categorise the tax slabs like > > productCategoryTypeId="TAX_CATEGORY" description="5.00 %" > categoryName="5.00 %"/> > > Now tax slab is associated with HSN. So, product will be associated with > HSN code in ProductCategoryMember entity like > > fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00.000"/> > > All the HSN code can be stored in ProductCategory entity > > productCategoryTypeId="HSN_CATEGORY" categoryName="XX" > description="Cheese and curd"/> > > Tax authority can be stored in PartyTaxAuthInfo entity like > > taxAuthPartyId="IGST" fromDate="2017-06-01 00:00:00.0" isNexus="Y" > partyTaxId="XGSTINXXX"/> > taxAuthPartyId="CGST" fromDate="2017-06-01 00:00:00.0" isNexus="Y" > partyTaxId="XGSTINXXX"/> > taxAuthPartyId="IN-AN_UTGST" fromDate="2017-06-01 00:00:00.0" isNexus="Y" > partyTaxId="XGSTINXXX"/> > taxAuthPartyId="IN-AP_SGST" fromDate="2017-06-01 00:00:00.0" isNexus="Y" > partyTaxId="XGSTINXXX"/> > > GST can be configurable in OFBiz using ProductStoreTaxSetting entity > We can write a separate service to calculate GST and configure at > ProductStore level using taxServiceName attribute of ProductStoreTaxSetting > entity. > > Just for Info > Right now In PO and SO OFBiz does not entertain both SHIP_ORIG_LOCATION > and SHIP_DESTINATION_LOCATION. We need to introduce this as well to > calculate the GST. > > Thanks & Regards > > Vaibhav Jain > Hotwax Systems, > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Rajesh Mallah <mallah.raj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi , >> >> I need help regarding how to apply taxes broadly based on the >> fact whether the supplier and consumer are in same state or not. >> >> We are able to apply taxes based on GEO ID of the customer but >> what is really required is the below: >> >> If Supplier.state == Customer.state >> add adjustment SGST @ X% >> add adjustment CGST @ X% >> else >> add adjustment IGST @ X+X% >> >> >> where: >> CGST --> Central Goods & Services Tax >> SGST --> State Goods & Services Tax >> IGST --> Integrated Goods & Services Tax >> >> >> Any help on this regard is solicited. >> >> >> regds >> mallah. >> > > >
Re: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records
+1 to introduce "quantity" attribute in InventoryTransfer entity. Please create a JIRA for this as well. Thanks & Regards -- Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Suraj Khurana < suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hello, > > While creating inventory transfers, a new inventory item is created and > successfully gets updated after completing inventory transfer. > As per current implementation, we don't store transferred quantity anywhere > in *InventoryTransfer *entity and quantity is only available on the newly > created inventory item. Problem is, it gets deluded on time being and user > won't get exact quantity for which inventory transfer was initialized. > > IMO, we should maintain transferred quantity at *InventoryTransfer *entity > as well for proper history maintenance of records. > > Please share your thoughts on this. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > *Suraj Khurana* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer > *HotWax Commerce* by *HotWax Systems* > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010 >
Re: Security group permission association must have date range
+1 Suraj Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Suraj Khurana < suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hello, > > There might be many scenarios in the real business that you need to > maintain specific permission to a specific group for some specified time > only. Like at the time of business expansion, permission related work > allotment to current employees, so maintaining history becomes important > here. > > IMO, there should be *fromDate* and *thruDate* fields on > *SecurityGroupPermission* entity as well with *fromDate* as part of primary > key. > > Please let me know your thoughts on this. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > *Suraj Khurana* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer > *HotWax Commerce* by *HotWax Systems* > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010 >
Re: Extend type entities to add name of detail entity where hasTable is true.
+1 for introducing new attribute "tableName". Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure this one is best practice or not, but it should be follow. We > should try to name the type same as entity name. > Other examples; > - PartyTpe >> PERSON and PARTY_GROUP > - PaymentMethodType >> CREDIT_CARD, FIN_ACCOUNT, EFT_ACCOUNT, GIFT_CARD > etc. > > IMO, best practice is to have the hasTable attribute in the entity. Also if > its entity exists then value must be Y. > > I see ShipmentGatewayConfigType and PaymentGatewayConfigType not setting > value to Y for the types system having the entities. Also PaymentMethodType > does not have the hasTable attribute. > > So I think we should fix both these and no need to have the extra field. > > > > Rishi Solanki > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > Direct: +91-9893287847 > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > www.hotwax.co > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Arun Patidar <arun.patidar@hotwaxsystems. > com > > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > 'hasTable' field of 'Type' entities is used to give an idea that detail > > entity exists or not. We generally get the name of detail entity on the > > basis of typeId field value. > > > > For example : > > > > ContactMechType,contactMechTypeId = "POSTAL_ADDRESS" then we go to > > PostalAddress for detail. > > > > similarly, > > ContactMechType,contactMechTypeId = "TELECOM_NUMBER" then we go to > > TelecomNumber for detail. > > > > is it a best practice to identify the name of detail entity on the basis > of > > typeId value? > > > > If yes, then there are some entities that are not following the pattern. > > Some of them are: > >- ShipmentGatewayConfigType > >- PaymentGatewayConfigType > > > > if not, then we can add a field in Type entities to mention the name of > > detail entity. > > > > > > Please let me know your thoughts. > > > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards > > --- > > Arun Patidar > > Manager, Enterprise Software Development > > > > HotWax Systems Pvt Ltd. > > > > www.hotwaxsystems.com > > >
Re: [Proposal] Support for more decimals in price fields
+1 Taher Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Deepak Dixit <deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com > wrote: > Looks good Taher. > > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < > slidingfilame...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > So this is one area where I faced many problems in the past, with > > units generally and money specifically. You could be surprised how > > many times something like rounding and accuracy can end up being a > > _big_ problem in systems. > > > > I think to really achieve flexibility (which is one of the strong > > points of OFBiz) then we should have a general purpose accuracy > > system. We can perhaps implement it as follows: > > - Amount could be a free field with no restriction on accuracy (it > > goes as far as the environment provides) > > - Accuracy should be a parameter with a default value. However, the > > parameter should be customizable to each unit of measurement > > (currency) separately. So for example, you can set USD to 2, KWD to 3, > > etc ... > > > > > https://www.currency-iso.org/en/home/tables/table-a1.html > > > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > www.hotwaxsystems.com > www.hotwax.co > > > > > > > - Rounding method should be a parameter with a default value. Examples > > could be ROUND_UP, ROUND_DOWN, ROUND_NEAREST > > - Rounding time should be a parameter with a default value. Perhaps > > something like DURING_CALCULATION, AFTER_CALCULATION > > - Then we implement all basic calculations in services or utility > > methods that fully utilize the above parameters and settings. > > > > Sorry if I went overboard :) But I usually always lean towards root > > solutions that solve many problems at once. Not sure if any folks are > > interested but if you like the idea I'd be willing to help with it. > > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Chinmay Patidar > > <chinmay.pati...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > Hello Devs, > > > > > > Ofbiz places a restriction on saving more than 3 decimal places in > price > > > related entity-fields. But there can be a number of use cases where a > > user > > > needs to store more than 2 or 3 decimal places in the currency related > > > entity-fields. > > > > > > I even saw some discussions related to this but didn't found any > > > conclusions from them. Even one issue > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-494> has been created but > > for > > > limited fields. So, I would like to propose support for multiple or > more > > > than 2/3 decimals in price related fields. > > > > > > Following are some findings related to the currency fields which would > be > > > helpful to examine the requirement: > > > Ofbiz uses two field types to store the currency related entity-fields. > > > These two types are 'currency-amount' and 'currency-precise' with their > > > respective types being NUMBER(18,2) and NUMBER(18,3). > > > > > > Upon initial research, one can conclude that changing the field > > definitions > > > of 'currency-amount' and 'currency-precise' would achieve the > > requirement. > > > But doing so will raise following questions which need to be answered. > > Feel > > > free to add in them. > > > > > >- What would be the precise value of precision(number of decimals)? > > >- Will these changes can make the system inconsistent? > > > > > > In addition, I would like to know the significance of having two > separate > > > field types, i.e. 'currency-amount' and 'currency-precise'. > > > > > > Also, I have marked one improvement which will be needed to realize the > > > solution. There are multiple occurrences where hardcoded scaling of 2 > has > > > been set to either display or store a currency field. This needs to be > > > changed and must be set dynamically. > > > > > > I'd like to hear your thoughts. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > *Chinmay Patidar* > > >
Fwd: Implementing GST tax in Ofbiz - CGST , SGST , IGST
Moving discussion to DEV list == Hello Rajesh/Everyone, GST(India) can be implemented in OFBiz as follow: After GST tax will apply on the basis of HSN code of product not on the product directly. So we can associate HSN code with tax slab in ProductCategoryRollup entity like As we need to define tax slab, ProductCategory entity can be used to categorise the tax slabs like Now tax slab is associated with HSN. So, product will be associated with HSN code in ProductCategoryMember entity like All the HSN code can be stored in ProductCategory entity Tax authority can be stored in PartyTaxAuthInfo entity like GST can be configurable in OFBiz using ProductStoreTaxSetting entity We can write a separate service to calculate GST and configure at ProductStore level using taxServiceName attribute of ProductStoreTaxSetting entity. Just for Info Right now In PO and SO OFBiz does not entertain both SHIP_ORIG_LOCATION and SHIP_DESTINATION_LOCATION. We need to introduce this as well to calculate the GST. Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Rajesh Mallah <mallah.raj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi , > > I need help regarding how to apply taxes broadly based on the > fact whether the supplier and consumer are in same state or not. > > We are able to apply taxes based on GEO ID of the customer but > what is really required is the below: > > If Supplier.state == Customer.state > add adjustment SGST @ X% > add adjustment CGST @ X% > else > add adjustment IGST @ X+X% > > > where: > CGST --> Central Goods & Services Tax > SGST --> State Goods & Services Tax > IGST --> Integrated Goods & Services Tax > > > Any help on this regard is solicited. > > > regds > mallah. >
Re: [PROPOSAL] Extend returnId and shipmentId in FinAccountTrans entity
Hello all, Thank you very much to all of you for sharing this valuable information. As we can conclude this conversation here. 1. Payment entity already has a field finAccountTransId. So there is no need of paymentId in the FinAccountTrans entity. 2. A financial account transaction may have multiple order so there is no need of orderId and orderItemSeqId in FinAccountTrans entity. If the following points are looking good then I will create a JIRA for this. Thanks & Regards, Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Paul Foxworthy <p...@cohsoft.com.au> wrote: > On 21 November 2017 at 21:48, Suraj Khurana <suraj.khurana@hotwaxsystems. > com > > wrote: > > > > > I think in this case, one *FinAccountTrans* record will be created when > you > > receive a cheque payments from a customer with DEPOSIT purpose which > marks > > *paymentId* in *FinAccountTrans *entity. > > > > Yes, there's a paymentId in the FinAccountTrans entity. That assumes there > will be one and only one Payment for the FinAccountTrans. That assumption > is flawed to my mind. There is also a finAccountTransId in the Payment. If > we dropped the paymentId, we would have a one-to-many between > FinAccountTrans and Payment, instead of one-to-one. That would be an > improvement. > > If you pay my invoice by direct deposit to my bank account, that should be > recorded with both a Payment and a FinAccountTrans in OFBiz. If you send me > a cheque, that should be recorded with a Payment. When I deposit a batch of > cheques, there should be a FinAccountTrans for that. > > Think of the statement you receive from the bank and you want to reconcile > against your own records. As far as the bank is concerned, there was one > deposit of a total amount. That's the amount you want to reconcile against > your FinAccountTrans. A payment from a customer is not necessarily the same > thing or the same amount as a FinAccountTrans. > > And moving further when certain amount from that payment is applied to any > > invoice, another *FinAccountTrans *will be created with corresponding > > orderId/shipmentId with WITHDRAWAL purpose. > > > > Nope. I receive a payment from a customer, and deposit the money in my bank > account. Applying the payment to a sale invoice does *not* reduce my bank > balance. It does mean the invoice has been paid. There are two separate > balances: the Accounts Receivable balance in an account in my GL, and the > balance of my account with the financial institution. > > The accounting transaction that varies the Accounts Receivable balance is > not a FinAccountTrans. It's an AcctgTrans. > > Any shipment will already be associated with an order. Storing the > shipmentId a second time in FinAccountTrans is redundant. There may be more > than one shipment anyway, so a single shipmentId attribute in > FinAccountTrans is not enough to hold the truth and would be misleading. > > > > In this manner I think we can track every transaction happened with the > > *FinAccount.* > > > > I do not dispute the need to track all this. Where I disagree is which > entities should be doing the tracking. Are you thinking any accounting > transaction is a FinAccountTrans? I think FinAccountTrans is more > specialised than that. A FinAccountTrans should correspond to and be > reconciled against a single line in a statement from a bank or other > financial institution. > > If you want to know the order or orders for a FinAccountTrans, go > > FinAccountTrans -> Payment -> PaymentApplication -> Invoice -> InvoiceItem > -> OrderItem -> OrderHeader > > If you want to know the shipment or shipments for a FinAccountTrans, go > > FinAccountTrans -> Payment -> PaymentApplication -> Invoice -> InvoiceItem > -> OrderItem -> ItemIssuance -> Shipment > > As I said, if you know that in your organisation there will always be only > one shipment, create custom screens and views to hide that complexity. But > the entities should be able to handle more complex organisations too. > > Cheers > > Paul Foxworthy > > -- > Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd > PO Box 2773 > Cheltenham Vic 3192 > Australia > > Phone: +61 3 9585 6788 > Web: http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/ > Email: i...@coherentsoftware.com.au >
Re: [Proposal] Extend facility entity
Hello all, Sorry for late reply as I was out of town. Thank you very much to all of you for sharing this valuable information. As we can conclude this conversation here. I will create a new entity facilityCalendar which will create the one-to-many relationship between facility and calendar. Here are the entity attributes: 1. facilityId* 2. calendarId* 3. fromDate* 4. thruDate A calendar will be used to store *openingTime*, *closingTime*, working weekdays and all this type of stuff. If this looks good to everyone then I will raise a JIRA for this. Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Deepak, > > Seems to me that FacilityCalendar would be easier > > My 2cts > > Jacques > > > > Le 27/11/2017 à 07:00, Deepak Dixit a écrit : > >> I think we can use TemporalExpression to manage this data. >> >> Thanks & Regards >> -- >> Deepak Dixit >> www.hotwaxsystems.com >> www.hotwax.co >> >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Arun Patidar < >> arun.pati...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: >> >> +1 for FacilityCalendar entity with purpose. >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks & Regards >>> --- >>> Arun Patidar >>> Manager, Enterprise Software Development >>> >>> HotWax Systems Pvt Ltd. >>> >>> www.hotwaxsystems.com >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, pierre <pierre.gau...@nereide.biz> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Pierre, >>>> >>>> The "primary" pattern is often used such in productCategory or >>>> productStore entity. >>>> It can simplify acces for simple use. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Pierre G >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 25/11/2017 22:26, Pierre Smits wrote: >>>> >>>> Why would a new field called primaryCalendarId be required when this >>>> >>> could >>> >>>> be resolved through you proposed FacilityCalendar entity? >>>> If there is only one it is the primary. And if multiple are required >>>> then >>>> one can have facilityCalendarPurposeId = >>>> primary/default/whatever-your-Definition-for-that-is. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Pierre >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 21:59 pierre.gaudin <pierre.gau...@nereide.fr> < >>>> >>> pierre.gau...@nereide.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Can we set a primaryCalendarId field on Facility entity and add a join >>>> entity FacilityCalendar with fields facilityId, caldendarId, >>>> facilityCalendarPurposeId, description for complex use ? >>>> >>>> Pierre >>>> >>>> >>>> On 25/11/2017 19:18, Pierre Smits wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jacques, All, >>>> >>>> Consider following scenarios: >>>> >>>> 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city >>>> government >>>> has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for >>>> trucks, >>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> other set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: >>>> 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service >>>> providers >>>> 2. a calendar for customers >>>> 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: >>>> 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics >>>> service providers >>>> 2. The outpatient clinic: a calendar for the opening hours >>>> 3. The nursing departments: a calendar regarding visiting hours >>>> >>>> Plus , for any kind of legal entity: one or more calendars regarding >>>> working hours of staff. I feel confident that you and others can dream >>>> up >>>> other scenarios too. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Pierre Smits >>>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> <http://www.orrtiz.com> >>>> OFBiz based solutions & services >>>> >>>> OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ >>>> 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project >>>> &
Re: [PROPOSAL] Extend returnId and shipmentId in FinAccountTrans entity
Hello All, Here is a link to ticket OFBIZ-9998 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9998> raised on JIRA. Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Suraj Khurana < suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Thanks, Paul and everyone for the detailed description. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > *Suraj Khurana* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer > *HotWax Commerce* by *HotWax Systems* > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010 > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav.jain@hotwaxsystems. > com> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > Thank you very much to all of you for sharing this valuable information. > > > > As we can conclude this conversation here. > > > >1. Payment entity already has a field finAccountTransId. So there is > no > >need of paymentId in the FinAccountTrans entity. > >2. A financial account transaction may have multiple order so there is > >no need of orderId and orderItemSeqId in FinAccountTrans entity. > > > > If the following points are looking good then I will create a JIRA for > > this. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Vaibhav Jain > > Hotwax Systems, > > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com > > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Paul Foxworthy <p...@cohsoft.com.au> > > wrote: > > > > > On 21 November 2017 at 21:48, Suraj Khurana > <suraj.khurana@hotwaxsystems. > > > com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think in this case, one *FinAccountTrans* record will be created > when > > > you > > > > receive a cheque payments from a customer with DEPOSIT purpose which > > > marks > > > > *paymentId* in *FinAccountTrans *entity. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there's a paymentId in the FinAccountTrans entity. That assumes > > there > > > will be one and only one Payment for the FinAccountTrans. That > assumption > > > is flawed to my mind. There is also a finAccountTransId in the Payment. > > If > > > we dropped the paymentId, we would have a one-to-many between > > > FinAccountTrans and Payment, instead of one-to-one. That would be an > > > improvement. > > > > > > If you pay my invoice by direct deposit to my bank account, that should > > be > > > recorded with both a Payment and a FinAccountTrans in OFBiz. If you > send > > me > > > a cheque, that should be recorded with a Payment. When I deposit a > batch > > of > > > cheques, there should be a FinAccountTrans for that. > > > > > > Think of the statement you receive from the bank and you want to > > reconcile > > > against your own records. As far as the bank is concerned, there was > one > > > deposit of a total amount. That's the amount you want to reconcile > > against > > > your FinAccountTrans. A payment from a customer is not necessarily the > > same > > > thing or the same amount as a FinAccountTrans. > > > > > > And moving further when certain amount from that payment is applied to > > any > > > > invoice, another *FinAccountTrans *will be created with corresponding > > > > orderId/shipmentId with WITHDRAWAL purpose. > > > > > > > > > > Nope. I receive a payment from a customer, and deposit the money in my > > bank > > > account. Applying the payment to a sale invoice does *not* reduce my > bank > > > balance. It does mean the invoice has been paid. There are two separate > > > balances: the Accounts Receivable balance in an account in my GL, and > the > > > balance of my account with the financial institution. > > > > > > The accounting transaction that varies the Accounts Receivable balance > is > > > not a FinAccountTrans. It's an AcctgTrans. > > > > > > Any shipment will already be associated with an order. Storing the > > > shipmentId a second time in FinAccountTrans is redundant. There may be > > more > > > than one shipment anyway, so a single shipmentId attribute in > > > FinAccountTrans is not enough to hold the truth and would be > misleading. > > > > > > > > > > In this manner I think we can track every transaction happened with > the > > > > *FinAccount.* > > > > > > > > > > I do not dispute the need to track all this. Where I disagree is which > > > entities
[Proposal] Extend facility entity
Hello all, *Facility* entity has attributes for *openedDate* and *closedDate* which specify that facility opening date and closing date if the facility is closed i.e. not in-use. All facilities are not open on all weekdays. We can have an attribute to record this. A retail store is also a facility and we should record *openingTime* and *closingTime* in facility entity. *openingTime* and *closingTime* may be different for some of the weekdays as well. Please share your thoughts on this. -- Thanks and Regards, Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com
Re: Are we ready to publish a new release (16.11.04)?
+1 Thanks & Regards, Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Aditya Sharma < aditya.sha...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 > > Thanks and Regards, > > *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems > <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-sharma-78291810a/> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Swapnil Mane < > swapnil.m...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > - Best Regards, > > Swapnil M Mane > > > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > we have published our last release mostly 6 months ago and since then > we > > > have merged several bug fixes to our 16.11 branch: I think it is time > to > > > publish a new one! > > > > > > If there are no objections I am going to prepare the release files in > the > > > next few days and then we will start the release vote: if you think we > > > should backport fixes to that branch this is the right time to do it > > before > > > we start the release process. > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Jacopo > > > > > >
[PROPOSAL] Extend returnId and shipmentId in FinAccountTrans entity
Hello all, Currently, orderId field is available and returnId, shipmentId fields can be introduced in the FinAccountTrans entity. These fields are useful while recording fin account transactions. Please let me know your thoughts on it. Thanks in advance Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Extend returnId and shipmentId in FinAccountTrans entity
Hello Pierre, I am talking about OFBiz trunk. Here is the path of the file: applications/datamodel/entitydef/accounting-entitymodel.xml:462 Just for more information, you can directly access this entity from entityengine https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/FindGeneric?entityName=FinAccountTrans Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Valibhav, > > Which version of OFBiz are you talking about? I looked in data > model.entitydef.accounting-entitymodel.xml and this entity did not show > up. > I may be overlooking something.. > > Best regards, > > > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Vaibhav Jain < > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > Currently, orderId field is available and returnId, shipmentId fields can > > be introduced in the FinAccountTrans entity. > > > > These fields are useful while recording fin account transactions. > > > > Please let me know your thoughts on it. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Vaibhav Jain > > Hotwax Systems, > > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com > > >
Re: [PROPOSAL] Extend returnId and shipmentId in FinAccountTrans entity
Hello Pierre, For reference, In inventoryItemDetail entity, we are recording orderId, returnId and shipmentId to track the transaction of inventory item. Comments Inline Grin. I indeed must have overlooked something. > > So the orderId field is present in that entity. With that we can derive > anything related, including shipments, returns, invoices, return shipments, > etc. > Yes we can derive all the related shipment, return, invoices and return Shipment from the order id but it is not recorded at financial transaction level which create a gap that why this transaction happen. We should record this type of references on transaction level. > > If we're going to include the fields you suggest, I surmise that before > long someone else comes along with another addition he/she finds convenient > to have in that table. As the name of the entity suggest. This is about > Financial Transactions (meaning cashflow related), not generic accounting > transactions related. > Yes, FinancialAccountTrans entity is used to record the financial transaction(Cashflow related) of any party. And in OFBiz financial transaction may be generated by various operations like Order, Shipment and Return e.t.c. So we should have information like why this transaction happens. WDYT? > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Vaibhav Jain < > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > Hello Pierre, > > > > I am talking about OFBiz trunk. > > > > Here is the path of the file: > > applications/datamodel/entitydef/accounting-entitymodel.xml:462 > > > > Just for more information, you can directly access this entity from > > entityengine > > https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/ > > FindGeneric?entityName=FinAccountTrans > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > > Vaibhav Jain > > Hotwax Systems, > > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Valibhav, > > > > > > Which version of OFBiz are you talking about? I looked in data > > > model.entitydef.accounting-entitymodel.xml and this entity did not > show > > > up. > > > I may be overlooking something.. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Pierre Smits > > > > > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > > > OFBiz based solutions & services > > > > > > OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 > > > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > > 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Vaibhav Jain < > > > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > Currently, orderId field is available and returnId, shipmentId fields > > can > > > > be introduced in the FinAccountTrans entity. > > > > > > > > These fields are useful while recording fin account transactions. > > > > > > > > Please let me know your thoughts on it. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > > > Vaibhav Jain > > > > Hotwax Systems, > > > > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Initial inventory import in OFBiz
Hello all, As per the further findings, I found that there can be various ways to import initial inventory from legacy system to OFBiz 1. We can import the inventory of the legacy system to OFBiz using receive inventory. And inventory cost can be calculated according to respective COGS method of the organisation. 2. We can create an inbound shipment in OFBiz for existing inventory of legacy system. Initial inventory import affects various modules of OFBiz. Please share your thoughts on it. Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com > wrote: > How to manage initial inventory import in OFBiz migrated from the legacy > system? > > How to manage initial inventory cost in accounting module? > > Vaibhav Jain > Hotwax Systems, > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com >
Initial inventory import in OFBiz
How to manage initial inventory import in OFBiz migrated from the legacy system? How to manage initial inventory cost in accounting module? Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com
Re: [Proposal] Extend facility entity
Hello all, Here is the link to ticket OFBIZ-10040 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10040> raised on JIRA. Thanks & Regards, Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Vaibhav Jain < vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Sorry for late reply as I was out of town. > > Thank you very much to all of you for sharing this valuable information. > > As we can conclude this conversation here. > > I will create a new entity facilityCalendar which will create the > one-to-many relationship between facility and calendar. Here are the entity > attributes: > >1. facilityId* >2. calendarId* >3. fromDate* >4. thruDate > > A calendar will be used to store *openingTime*, *closingTime*, working > weekdays and all this type of stuff. > > If this looks good to everyone then I will raise a JIRA for this. > > Thanks & Regards > > Vaibhav Jain > Hotwax Systems, > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >> Hi Deepak, >> >> Seems to me that FacilityCalendar would be easier >> >> My 2cts >> >> Jacques >> >> >> >> Le 27/11/2017 à 07:00, Deepak Dixit a écrit : >> >>> I think we can use TemporalExpression to manage this data. >>> >>> Thanks & Regards >>> -- >>> Deepak Dixit >>> www.hotwaxsystems.com >>> www.hotwax.co >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Arun Patidar < >>> arun.pati...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 for FacilityCalendar entity with purpose. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks & Regards >>>> --- >>>> Arun Patidar >>>> Manager, Enterprise Software Development >>>> >>>> HotWax Systems Pvt Ltd. >>>> >>>> www.hotwaxsystems.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:31 AM, pierre <pierre.gau...@nereide.biz> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Pierre, >>>>> >>>>> The "primary" pattern is often used such in productCategory or >>>>> productStore entity. >>>>> It can simplify acces for simple use. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Pierre G >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 25/11/2017 22:26, Pierre Smits wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why would a new field called primaryCalendarId be required when this >>>>> >>>> could >>>> >>>>> be resolved through you proposed FacilityCalendar entity? >>>>> If there is only one it is the primary. And if multiple are required >>>>> then >>>>> one can have facilityCalendarPurposeId = >>>>> primary/default/whatever-your-Definition-for-that-is. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Pierre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 21:59 pierre.gaudin <pierre.gau...@nereide.fr> >>>>> < >>>>> >>>> pierre.gau...@nereide.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can we set a primaryCalendarId field on Facility entity and add a join >>>>> entity FacilityCalendar with fields facilityId, caldendarId, >>>>> facilityCalendarPurposeId, description for complex use ? >>>>> >>>>> Pierre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 25/11/2017 19:18, Pierre Smits wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Jacques, All, >>>>> >>>>> Consider following scenarios: >>>>> >>>>> 1. A business with a facility in a city center, where city >>>>> government >>>>> has placed restrictions on the access of the city center for >>>>> trucks, >>>>> >>>>> and >>>>> >>>>> other set of restrictions of opening hours for customers: >>>>> 1. a calendar for suppliers and other logistics service >>>>> providers >>>>> 2. a calendar for customers >>>>> 2. A hospital with multiple child facilities: >>>>> 1. The warehouse: a calendar for suppliers and other logistics >>>>> service provide
Re: RE: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records
Hello All, Thanks Swapnil for the detailed business scenarios. Thanks James for the reply. I just want to convey that there is no need to use a separate data model for inventory transfer. We can use order data model for inventory transfer. We can create a SO from one facility which create an automated PO for another facility. Inventory transfer will be done using sales/purchase order. Stock move is used for intra-warehouse inventory transfer while inventory transfer is for inter-warehouse inventory transfer. We can achieve inventory transfer using order data model instead of using separate data model for inventory transfer. 1. On the basis of from party and to party we can identify that order is transfer order(In transfer order fromParty and toParty are same). 2. status of inventory transfer can be maintained in OrderStatus entity. 3. Tax is applied or not can be configurable. 4. Shipment is already associated with order data model. 5. Order adjustment can be used to record adjustments. 6. The Orderitem entity can be used to transfer multiple products at a time. 7. Reservation and issuance are already working in order data model. 8. The OrderContent entity can be used to attach Stock transfer document(legal document vary according to country law) with inventory transfer. Please correct me if I missed something. Thanks & Regards -- Vaibhav Jain Hotwax Systems, vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:54 PM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Swapnil, > > You may want to consider having the following modifications: > > 1) Item Issuance & Shipment Receipt entities: Add columns (i.e. > InventoryTransferHeaderId & InventoryTransferId ) to support inventory > transfer with shipment. > > 2) Inventory Transfer Adjustment entity: For the tax. > > 3) Inventory Transfer Header entity: For group transfer (as discussed > earlier) > > Regards, > James Yong > > On 2017-10-19 19:12, Swapnil Shah <swapnil.s...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > Let me try adding few more insights/details with regard to stock transfer > > flow. > > > > > > > > As we are referring to intra-organizational goods movement i.e., so > > movement of goods would be for and within the same business entity. Here > > are few pointers (if it can help in assessing any kind of technical > > trade-off that needs to be made with respect to current implementation) : > > > >- Stock Transfer per se are going to involve goods exchange but there > is > >no real time money exchange involved between shipper and receiver as > they > >are both the very same business entity in the legal sense. So business > >might not be necessarily interested in generating any sales or > purchase > >invoice against such transactions. Nor will there be any real time > payment > >or invoice settlement required at either end. > >- In financial terms there are tax implications but its applicability > >varies depending upon the laws of the land or country/state-specific > tax > >regulations. For example: > > - In US the very same item transferred in certain state might be > > taxable at certain rate but totally exempted or taxed at > > different rate in > > another (someone with better understanding of US or EUR tax > > regulations can > > throw more light and let us know if currently intra-company > > goods transfer > > are even taxable or not) > > - In India, the tax implications in the case of goods transfer is > now > > shifted on the supply of goods. As a result: > > - For inter-state transfer *there is tax liability and in this > > case, only a separate “Tax Invoice”* needs to be issued along > with > > stock transfer note and supporting document (depending on the > > inter-state > > regulations while crossing the state borders) > > - For intra-state transfers if business entity is having single > > registration for originating and receiving branches with tax > > authority then *there > > is no tax liability and hence no Tax Invoice *needs to be issue. > > Only Delivery Note should suffice to transfer the goods. > > - For intra-state transfers if business entity is having > different > > registration for originating and receiving branches with tax > > authority then *there > > is tax liability and in this case, only a separate “Tax > Invoice”* > > needs to be issued along with stock transfer note. > > - Any kind of applicable tax (if any) needs to be paid t
Re: Welcome to Swapnil M. Mane as new committer!
Congratulations Swapnil! Vaibhav Jain Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems m: 782-834-1900 e: vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:31 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > The OFBiz PMC has invited Swapnil to become a new committer and we > arepleased to announce that he has accepted. > > Swapnil has a high level of commitment for Apache OFBiz and consistently > works with the community. > > He is one of the most advanced contributors (including committers) in the > functional domain. > > Please join me in welcoming and congratulating Swapnil. > > Jacques > >
Re: Welcome to Aditya Sharma as new committer!
Congratulations Aditya! Vaibhav Jain Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems m: 782-834-1900 e: vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:30 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > The OFBiz PMC has invited Aditya to become a new committer and we > arepleased to announce that he has accepted. > > Aditya has proved to be committed and doing a very good work as a > contributor. > > He notably coordinated the work around the refactoring of the data model > documents, helped in a lot of Jiras and answered appropriately on MLs. > > Please join me in welcoming and congratulating Aditya. > > Jacques > >
Re: Welcome to Suraj Khurana as new committer!
Congratulations Suraj! Vaibhav Jain Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems m: 782-834-1900 e: vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:30 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > The OFBiz PMC has invited Suraj to become a new committer and we > arepleased to announce that he has accepted. > > Suraj has proved to be committed for a long time now and is doing a very > good work as a contributor. > > He helped in a lot of Jiras, answered properly on MLs and proposed a few > quite interesting subjects. > > Please join me in welcoming and congratulating Suraj. > > Jacques > >
Re: New ASF Member from OFBiz Community
Congratulations Deepak! Vaibhav Jain Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems m: 782-834-1900 e: vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Suraj Khurana < suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Many congratulations Deepak. > > -- > Best Regards, > *Suraj Khurana* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer > *HotWax Commerce* by *HotWax Systems* > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010 > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:47 AM Amit Gadaley <amit.gadaley@hotwaxsystems. > com> > wrote: > > > Congratulations Deepak!! > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Akash Jain < > akash.j...@hotwaxsystems.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Many Congratulations Deepak! > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > -- > > > Akash Jain > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 9:08 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > > > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > today the ASF has published the list of newly nominated members and > > "our" > > > > Deepak Dixit is one of them: > > > > > > > > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the-apache- > > > > software-foundation-welcomes2 > > > > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://blogs.apache.org/ > > > > foundation/entry/the-apache-software-foundation-welcomes2& > > > > sa=D=hangouts=1525357595561000= > > > > AFQjCNHXDpgnyJ1wgnbZ06kEPTsbXs9MDQ> > > > > > > > > Congratulations Deepak! > > > > > > > > Jacopo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks and Regards, > > *Amit Gadaley <https://about.me/amit_gadaley>* | Senior Enterprise > > Software > > Engineer > > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems > > <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, > > Indore, > > M.P., India - 452010 > > Cell phone: +91 958.459.3069 > > > > <https://about.me/amit_gadaley?promo=email_sig> > > >
Re: Check for only QOH while doing reservations
+1 Suraj I agree with Rishi, We should start another mail thread to discuss race condition. IMO, At the time of reservation, we should check for ATP instead of QOH(As Suraj suggest). Vaibhav Jain Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems m: 782-834-1900 e: vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com <desiree.jenkin...@hotwax.co> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Suraj Khurana < suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Thanks everyone for your input. > > Here <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10337> is the ticket > created for the same. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > *Suraj Khurana* | Omni-channel OMS Technical Expert > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems > <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010 > Cell phone: +91 96697-50002 > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks Swapnil for adding the use case. > > > > After this it looks like, this is kind of scenario when we couldn't lean > on > > the ATP. Which should be discussed and addressed. But now I'm sure that > > what Suraj suggested makes sense we can go with the improvement Suraj > > suggested. > > > > In isolation we can discuss and try to address the race condition issue > and > > follow the steps. > > > > - Add script to replicate the issue multiple multiple times. > > - Discuss and finalize the fix. > > - Provide fix. > > > > I would like to help in the race condition issue Swapnil shared. > > > > +1 for Suraj to move ahead for the improvement. > > > > > > Rishi Solanki > > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > > Direct: +91-9893287847 > > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > www.hotwax.co > > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Swapnil Shah < > > swapnil.s...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > > > There are certain business cases around order promising where we found > > that > > > systemic ATP hasn't proved that much reliable. Especially when its > > business > > > decision to not accept or promise more orders than allocated units of > > > supply > > > for sale. > > > > > > For example, during heavy load(ordering) there could be instances when > > > higher number of open orders/carts are competing for same systemic ATP > at > > > any given point of time. In such scenarios due to any reason if rate of > > > performing systemic reservations lags behind the rate of ordering than > > > systemic ATP would also keep lagging behind the actual allocation being > > > made > > > with respect to QOH. Thus system would always keep on accepting orders > > and > > > promising them unless systemic ATP goes down to zero (but in reality > the > > > QOH > > > Is already exhausted way before than systemic ATP went to zero). It > leads > > > to > > > the problem of "Over Promising" and eventually higher than acceptable > > > number > > > of backorders to honor for business. In the hindsight it looks like > this > > > could be one of the reason why the additional check on QOH was in place > > > before. > > > > > > I am not sure if it’s the best way, but one of the possible alternative > > we > > > tried to handle such cases was by grounding the order creation logic > > based > > > on the fact whether there is positive "Available to Order (ATO)" at the > > > time > > > of order submission or adding items to cart rather than ATP. At high > > level > > > ATO for any given SKU could be determined on run time as follows: > > > ATO = QOH + Incoming Shipments(Scheduled Receipts) - (Total unshipped > > units > > > on Open Orders & Carts) > > > > > > I hope such cases could help in providing more holistic view while > > > leveraging or relying upon the reservation logic. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Swapnil > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jacopo Cappellato <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 1:47 PM > > > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Check for only QOH while doing reservations > > > > > > Thanks Suraj, > > > > > > after reviewing that old commit I am inclined to think that the change > > you > > > are suggesting makes sense. > > > Before
Re: Confusing entity names
+1 Suraj Vaibhav Jain Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems m: 782-834-1900 e: vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com <desiree.jenkin...@hotwax.co> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Swapnil Mane < swapnil.m...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 > > We maintain the document for users to upgrade the revision. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/ > Revisions+Requiring+Data+Migration+-+upgrade+ofbiz > So, IMO we can proceed with this change. > > > - Best Regards, > Swapnil M Mane > www.hotwaxsystems.com > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Suraj Khurana < > suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > There are some entities which could be renamed as per their usage. > > > >- *OrderItemShipGroup*: It shows order ship groups and it doesn't > >contain anything at order item level. So, it could be re-named as > >*OrderShipGroup.* > >- *OrderItemShipGroupAssoc: *It do not maintain any association type, > it > >just contains order item with respect to ship group, so this could be > >re-named as *OrderItemShipGroup *to maintain consistency and code > >readablity. > > > > I know that these entities are crucial part of OOTB data model since > > inception. Having thought in mind that 'Naming should be self > explanatory', > > this is a proposal and It would be great to hear communities thought on > > this topic. > > > > Please share your opinions on this. > > > > -- > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > *Suraj Khurana* | Omni-channel OMS Technical Expert > > *HotWax Commerce* by *HotWax Systems* > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010 > > Cell phone: +91 96697-50002 > > >
Re: RE: RE: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records
Hello Pawan, Inventory transfer is a type of order. So, IMO instead of introducing a new data model for inventory transfer, we should use Order data model. +1 for Design approach #3 Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems m: 782-834-1900 e: vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Pawan Verma <pawan.ve...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Here is the right link for the subtask OFBIZ-10365< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10365>. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > > *Pawan Verma* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems > <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part ||, Near Brilliant Convention Center, > Indore, > M.P, India - 452010 > Cell phone: +91 9977705687 > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Pawan Verma < > pawan.ve...@hotwaxsystems.com> > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > I have added possible 4 different Design approaches for this improvement > > at subtask OFBIZ-10365<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/10365>. We > > can discuss on this and finalize best possible approach for this task. > > > > -- > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > *Pawan Verma* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer > > HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems > > <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part ||, Near Brilliant Convention Center, > > Indore, M.P, India - 452010 > > Cell phone: +91 9977705687 > > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Pawan Verma < > > pawan.ve...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > >> Hello All, > >> > >> Thanks, everyone for your thoughts and inputs. > >> > >> Here <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10353> is the ticket > >> created for the same. Soon I will add the high-level design of the task. > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks and Regards, > >> > >> *Pawan Verma* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer > >> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems > >> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > >> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part ||, Near Brilliant Convention Center, > >> Indore, M.P, India - 452010 > >> Cell phone: +91 9977705687 > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> An internal order policy with appropriate process definition and > >>> protocols > >>> is a widely accepted solution. > >>> > >>> Best regards > >>> > >>> Pierre > >>> > >>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 at 14:59 James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> > +1 for Inventory Transfer without using Order entity. > >>> > > >>> > On 2017-10-28 02:13, Swapnil Shah <swapnil.s...@hotwaxsystems.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > Thanks all your suggestions. > >>> > > I think similarity of the discussed requirements with ordering flow > >>> lead > >>> > to > >>> > > the suggestions to use Order model. I don't have strong preference > >>> to use > >>> > > one over another as long as we are able to support bulk of the > >>> discussed > >>> > > requirements in this thread in a less complicated, easy to maintain > >>> and > >>> > most > >>> > > flexible way. > >>> > > > >>> > > If we all are in agreement to take Inventory Transfer route then > >>> let's > >>> > cut a > >>> > > JIRA to proceed with it. > >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks, > >>> > > Swapnil > >>> > > > >>> > > -Original Message- > >>> > > From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org] > >>> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 8:27 PM > >>> > > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > >>> > > Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer > >>> records > >>> > > > >>> > > Hi all, > >>> > > > >>> > > Having suggested possible entity changes to both approaches (with > or > >>> > without > >>> > > Order entity), I prefer not to make use of Order entity for > inventory > >>> > >
Re: Move SecurityPermission, SecurityGroup and SecurityGroupPermission Data to seed data files
+1 Arun Vaibhav Jain Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems m: 782-834-1900 e: vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 1:13 PM Rishi Solanki wrote: > +1 for Arun's thought on considering SecurityPermission as seed and > SecurityGroup and SecurityGroupPermission as demo. > > -- > Rishi Solanki > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > Direct: +91-9893287847 > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > www.hotwax.co > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:53 PM Gil Portenseigne < > gil.portensei...@nereide.fr> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Le vendredi 21 sept. 2018 à 11:19:39 (+0530), Arun Patidar a écrit : > > > Deepak, > > > > > > IMO, 'SecurityPermission' data should always be part of seed data. but > > > SecurityGroup and SecurityGroupPermission like a sample data so should > be > > > part of demo data. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > Arun Patidar > > > Director of Information Systems > > > > > > *HotWax CommerceReal OmniChannel. Real Results.* > > > m: +91 9827353082 > > > w: www.hotwax.co > > > > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/hotwaxcommerce/> > > > <https://www.facebook.com/HotWaxCommerce/> > > > <https://twitter.com/hotwaxcommerce> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:59 AM Deepak Nigam < > deepak.nigam1...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > Currently, SecurityPermission, SecurityGroup and > > SecurityGroupPermission > > > > data are mixed in demo and seed data files. Shouldn't these all data > be > > > > part of seed data files only? > > > > > > > > Most of the SecurityPermission data is already part of seed data > > except the > > > > files HumanresDemoData.xml and SecurityGroupDemoData.xml files, but > > there > > > > is not any fixed pattern for the SecurityGroup and > > > > SecurityGroupPermissionData. > > > > > > > > A Jira ticket OFBIZ-10575 > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10575> is available for > > the > > > > same. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > > -- > > > > Deepak Nigam > > > > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > > > > > > >
Re: ProductFacility creation on 'Receive Inventory'
Hello Deepak, IMO, It should be configurable that either *ProductFacility* is required or not. But we need to think on the respective points to proceed further If ProductFacility is required then 1. The user needs to create a ProductFacility record before receiving inventory Or 2. Silently system can create a ProductFacility record for the specific one If ProductFacility is not required then need to check the following workflows 1. How to show the inventory of the product which is not associate with the respective facility 2. How inventory reservation will work? as of now, the reservation does not handle this type of inventory. 3. How inventory valuation entertain this inventory? As of now, the inventory valuation does not handle this type of inventory. 4. Do we need any other workflow to manage this type of inventory? Thanks & Regards Vaibhav Jain Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems m: 782-834-1900 e: vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:28 PM Scott Gray wrote: > Sounds like there are 3 options available: > 1. Improve any view/report screens to not rely on ProductFacility but > instead report on what is actually in the warehouse via InventoryItem. > 2. Require ProductFacility but silently create it when it is absent > 3. Require ProductFacility and reject receipt of products when it is absent > > My first thought is that if ProductFacility were truly required then we > would have a foreign key constraint on InventoryItem to prevent them from > being created. So I'm guessing the original intent wasn't to require a > ProductFacility record. > > IMO we should first look to improving the view/report screens to not > require ProductFacility, if that is not possible or overly complicated then > we could look at requiring ProductFacility. If we wanted to require > ProductFacility in order to enforce business rules, then that should > probably be configurable. > > Regards > Scott > > On 19 September 2018 at 10:49, Deepak Nigam > wrote: > > > Thanks, Suraj. > > > > @All, as per the suggestions provided in the Jira ticket, should we > > restrict the receiving of non-associated products and simply return an > > error message? WDYT? > > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:45 PM Suraj Khurana < > > suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello Deepak, > > > > > > Please have a look. > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7481 > > > > > > HTH. > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > Suraj Khurana > > > Omnichannel OMS Technical Expert > > > HotWax Systems > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:38 PM, deepak nigam < > > deepak.nigam1...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > We can directly receive inventory of a product into a facility by > using > > > the > > > > option 'Facility' -> 'Receive Inventory'. Here we can select a > product > > > for > > > > receiving which is not associated with the receiving facility (e.g. > > > product > > > > -> Purple Gizmo GZ-5005, facility -> WebS Store Warehouse). > > > > > > > > After a successful receive also, the product is not getting > associated > > > with > > > > the facility. Due to this, we can't find the newly received product > > under > > > > the 'Inventory' section of the facility. Should the product be > > associated > > > > with the facility after receiving? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > > -- > > > > Deepak Nigam > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DOC] Example asciidoc file as guideline
Hi Michael, +1 Vaibhav Jain Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems m: 782-834-1900 e: vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:26 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > Maybe I was not clear enough... I am suggesting some kind of style guide. > > I think if we provide it in the early stage, people might get inspired > from it and have examples in a very compressed form. I find the several > examples that I've studied very helpful but they are cluttered all over > the internet so it could be a shortcut for others. > > I will provide an example to make it clearer. Will take some days as I > am off until coming Wednesday. > > Thanks, > > Michael Brohl > ecomify GmbH > www.ecomify.de > > > Am 18.03.18 um 17:46 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb: > > Hmmm, Sounds like a good idea, but perhaps maybe a bit early? We might > > be still evolving and learning how to structure our documents. > > > > Also, maybe if we keep our documents clean and consistent, then they > > themselves offer an example for how to write stuff? Examples usually > > run out of date quickly unless we have some kind of mechanism in place > > for always keeping them up to date. Anyway, if we decide to go that > > route, [1] serves as a nice sample for us to imitate but with > > instructions specific to OFBiz > > > > [1] https://asciidoctor.org/docs/asciidoc-recommended-practices/ > > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Michael Brohl > wrote: > >> Heyho, > >> > >> I played around with asciidoc a bit and did some minor changes to > display a > >> nice title page and did some configurations for the user/developer > manuals. > >> > >> I studied a few example .adoc files and wonder if we should provide a > best > >> practice example .adoc file. This could contain all formatting, > guidelines > >> to mark special contents (info, attention, citations etc.) or how to > format > >> code examples. > >> > >> It would be a guideline as well as an example to learn from. I am hoping > >> that it is easier for people to get started and it could also improve > the > >> quality. > >> > >> This document itself could be in the codebase and evolve over time. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Michael Brohl > >> ecomify GmbH > >> www.ecomify.de > >> > >> > >> > > >
Re: Create return till ...
Hello Suraj, *Bottom Line:* We should have a field to manage days to Return at the product and product store level both. *Story:* We have a flag on the product level to manage that product is returnable or not. We can not manage the information on the product store level only because each product is returnable for a different and specific time period (depends on business). We can manage this on the product store level which can be used if the product is returnable but days to return is not specified on the product level. Does this make sense to you as well? Kind Regards, *Vaibhav Jain* | Senior Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore, M.P 452010 Linkedin: *Vaibhav Jain* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaibhav-jain-170793/> On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 1:20 PM Suraj Khurana wrote: > Hello, > > In OFBiz, we can create a return for order without checking when that order > is placed, it might be years long. > IMO, we should have a field something like daysToReturn at product store > level to allow creating return till after that much days of order > completion. > > I could not find anything else relevant to this and this is a very common > e-commerce scenario for any business. > > Am I missing something? > Please share your thoughts on the same. > > -- > Best Regards > Suraj Khurana > TECHNICAL CONSULTANT > mobile: +91 9669750002 > email: suraj.khur...@hotwax.co > www.hotwax.co >
Re: Create return till ...
Agree with Arun, Just an addon If we are using ProductFacility entity then we should think to move the returnable flag from product to the productFacility entity. Kind Regards, *Vaibhav Jain* | Senior Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore, M.P 452010 Linkedin: *Vaibhav Jain* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaibhav-jain-170793/> On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 5:45 PM Arun Patidar wrote: > We can use ProductFacility entity for storing number of days and can copy > to it to OrderItem during order creation. > > > Kind Regards, > *Arun Patidar* | Manager, Enterprise Development > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, > Indore, M.P. 452010 > Linkedin: *Arun Patidar* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/arunpatidar> > > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 4:37 PM Rishi Solanki > wrote: > > > +1 for having this. The only thing I would like to add go for global > > setting which should be overridden by product level setting. For > example; A > > site may deal in industry which may require different number of days for > > the different products. > > Also agree with Pierre on point we should be aware of the fact that > > unnecessary data model extension should be avoided. > > > > Question: how should we manage if we would like to have two store and for > > both stores we want to have different number of days limit for return. > > My Answer: While configuring the store the System property should be > > configured against prefix/suffix of store id. > > > > Please feel free to add more details or alternative way for handling > this. > > > > Best Regards, > > -- > > Rishi Solanki > > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > > Direct: +91-9893287847 > > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > www.hotwax.co > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 1:20 PM Suraj Khurana > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > In OFBiz, we can create a return for order without checking when that > > order > > > is placed, it might be years long. > > > IMO, we should have a field something like daysToReturn at product > store > > > level to allow creating return till after that much days of order > > > completion. > > > > > > I could not find anything else relevant to this and this is a very > common > > > e-commerce scenario for any business. > > > > > > Am I missing something? > > > Please share your thoughts on the same. > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards > > > Suraj Khurana > > > TECHNICAL CONSULTANT > > > mobile: +91 9669750002 > > > email: suraj.khur...@hotwax.co > > > www.hotwax.co > > > > > >
Re: Welcome to Deepak Nigam as new committer!
Many congratulations Deepak Nigam! Kind Regards, Vaibhav Jain Senior Enterprise Software Engineer *HotWax Systems* *Enterprise open source experts* cell: 782 834 1900 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:46 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > Congratulations and Welcome, Deepak! > > Regards, > > Michael > > Am 13.06.19 um 07:48 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > > The OFBiz PMC has invited Deepak to become a new committer and we are > > pleased to announce that he has accepted. > > > > Deepak is part of the community since January 2016 and has proved to > > be committed since. > > > > He notably made a great work for OFBIZ-10518 "Inventory (Supply) > > Allocation Planning " > > > > He not only worked in Jira, but also answered accurately on MLs where > > he supported our users. > > > > Please join me in welcoming and congratulating Deepak. > > > > Jacques > > > >
ReturnContactMech is not used
*Bottom line:* ReturnContactMech entity is not used in OFBiz *Story:* ContactMech of parties involved in an order is captured in OrderContactMech entity. ContactMech of parties involved in the return is not captured in ReturnContactMech entity. Kind Regards, *Vaibhav Jain* | Senior Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore, M.P 452010 Linkedin: *Vaibhav Jain* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaibhav-jain-170793/> [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail_medium=signature_campaign=signaturevirality5;> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail_medium=signature_campaign=signaturevirality5;> 04/27/19, 12:23:48 PM
Re: ReturnContactMech is not used
Thanks for the quick response. A JIRA is created to add a workflow to capture the contactMech of associated parties in the ReturnContactMech entity. Here is the reference for the same https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10971 Kind Regards, *Vaibhav Jain* | Senior Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore, M.P 452010 Linkedin: *Vaibhav Jain* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaibhav-jain-170793/> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 2:37 PM Swapnil M Mane wrote: > +1 > > - Best Regards, > Swapnil M Mane, > ofbiz.apache.org > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:33 PM Vaibhav Jain < > vaibhav.j...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > *Bottom line:* > > ReturnContactMech entity is not used in OFBiz > > > > *Story:* > > ContactMech of parties involved in an order is captured in > OrderContactMech > > entity. > > ContactMech of parties involved in the return is not captured in > > ReturnContactMech entity. > > > > Kind Regards, > > *Vaibhav Jain* | Senior Enterprise Software Engineer > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, > > Indore, > > M.P 452010 > > Linkedin: *Vaibhav Jain* < > https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaibhav-jain-170793/ > > > > > > > [image: Mailtrack] > > < > > > https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail_medium=signature_campaign=signaturevirality5; > > > > > Sender > > notified by > > Mailtrack > > < > > > https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail_medium=signature_campaign=signaturevirality5; > > > > > 04/27/19, > > 12:23:48 PM > > >
How to get reservations happened in a specific period
Hello team, We are managing the master inventory data in the OFBiz and want to do real-time/hourly basis inventory sync up with a third party system. Question: How can we get the reservations that happened in a specific period? Kind Regards, Vaibhav Jain cell: 782 834 1900
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7274) Pagination issue when list of item is shown in pop-up
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7274: --- Summary: Pagination issue when list of item is shown in pop-up Key: OFBIZ-7274 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7274 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ALL APPLICATIONS Reporter: Vaibhav Jain Priority: Minor This is one place where I observed the issue but exist at all the places for lookup for any anything. So need to correct it at all the places. Possibly needs a correction at the framework level. Steps to regenerate the issue: 1. Go to order manager. 2. Go to sub-menu "Quotes" 3. Click on look-up button of partyId in the form 4. In a pop-up screen of "Lookup party by name" click on find button. Actual: 1. In the header section of data table "Display 1-50 of x" is missing. (Please refer screenshot for more detail) Expected : 1. "Display 1-50 of x" should be shown there. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7274) Pagination issue when list of item is shown in pop-up
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7274: Attachment: OFBIZ7274.png > Pagination issue when list of item is shown in pop-up > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7274 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ALL APPLICATIONS > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ7274.png > > > This is one place where I observed the issue but exist at all the places for > lookup for any anything. So need to correct it at all the places. Possibly > needs a correction at the framework level. > Steps to regenerate the issue: > 1. Go to order manager. > 2. Go to sub-menu "Quotes" > 3. Click on look-up button of partyId in the form > 4. In a pop-up screen of "Lookup party by name" click on find button. > Actual: > 1. In the header section of data table "Display 1-50 of x" is missing. > (Please refer screenshot for more detail) > Expected : > 1. "Display 1-50 of x" should be shown there. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7154) Update Survey Question is not working from the list of SurveyQuestionAppl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vaibhav jain updated OFBIZ-7154: Attachment: OFBIZ-7154.patch In the last patch is missing by mistake. So, here is the updated patch. > Update Survey Question is not working from the list of SurveyQuestionAppl > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7154 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: content >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Swapnil M Mane >Assignee: Pranay Pandey > Attachments: OFBIZ-7154.patch, OFBIZ-7154.patch, ui_improvement.png, > update_question.png > > > Steps to regenerate: > 1.) Find Survey (https://localhost:8443/content/control/FindSurvey) > 2.) Open any Survey > 3.) Select the sub-menu 'Questions' > 4.) In 'Edit Survey Questions Survey ID' section, Question field is editable. > 5.) Edit the Question detail in this field. > 6.) Use the Update option in the row. > 7.) The question doesn't get updated. > Please find the screenshot (update_question.png) for more details. > Also, it has minor UI improvement, > 1.) Select the 'Edit Question' option in 'Edit Survey Questions Survey ID #' > section > 2.) Now, in the 'Edit Question' section below, the submit button title should > be 'Update' instead of 'Create' > Please refer screenshot (ui_improvement.png) for more details. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7154) Update Survey Question is not working from the list of SurveyQuestionAppl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vaibhav jain updated OFBIZ-7154: Attachment: OFBIZ-7154.patch Here is the patch > Update Survey Question is not working from the list of SurveyQuestionAppl > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7154 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: content >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Swapnil M Mane > Assignee: vaibhav jain > Attachments: OFBIZ-7154.patch, ui_improvement.png, update_question.png > > > Steps to regenerate: > 1.) Find Survey (https://localhost:8443/content/control/FindSurvey) > 2.) Open any Survey > 3.) Select the sub-menu 'Questions' > 4.) In 'Edit Survey Questions Survey ID' section, Question field is editable. > 5.) Edit the Question detail in this field. > 6.) Use the Update option in the row. > 7.) The question doesn't get updated. > Please find the screenshot (update_question.png) for more details. > Also, it has minor UI improvement, > 1.) Select the 'Edit Question' option in 'Edit Survey Questions Survey ID #' > section > 2.) Now, in the 'Edit Question' section below, the submit button title should > be 'Update' instead of 'Create' > Please refer screenshot (ui_improvement.png) for more details. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7115) Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
vaibhav jain updated OFBIZ-7115:
Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-7154.patch)
> Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7115
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: specialpurpose/projectmgr
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: vaibhav jain
>Assignee: Pranay Pandey
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7115.patch
>
>
> Steps to regenerate (load the system with demo data)
> 1. Go to "PROJECT" menu (https://localhost:8443/projectmgr/control/main)
> 2. Select the 'Timesheet' sub-menu option
> 3. Click on "find" button.
> 4. Click on DEMO-TIMESHEET1 in the list.
> 5. The system working as expected but the terminal throws the following error
> {code}
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,631 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13
> |FlexibleStringExpander|W| Error evaluating scriptlet
> [${groovy:workEffortId!=void&&!"Totals".equals(workEffortId)?workEffortId:""}];
> error was: groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property:
> workEffortId for class: script1463806799411782919921
> [java] groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property:
> workEffortId for class: script1463806799411782919921
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.unwrap(ScriptBytecodeAdapter.java:53)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoGetPropertySite.getProperty(PogoGetPropertySite.java:52)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callGroovyObjectGetProperty(AbstractCallSite.java:307)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> and
> |W| Could not get a system property for widget.autocompleter.defaultDelay :
> null
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,732 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
> |E| XmlFileLoader: File
> file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
> process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
> 'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,795 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
> |E| XmlFileLoader: File
> file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
> process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
> 'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (OFBIZ-7115) Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
vaibhav jain updated OFBIZ-7115:
Comment: was deleted
(was: In the last patch is missing by mistake. So, here is the updated
patch.)
> Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7115
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: specialpurpose/projectmgr
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: vaibhav jain
>Assignee: Pranay Pandey
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7115.patch
>
>
> Steps to regenerate (load the system with demo data)
> 1. Go to "PROJECT" menu (https://localhost:8443/projectmgr/control/main)
> 2. Select the 'Timesheet' sub-menu option
> 3. Click on "find" button.
> 4. Click on DEMO-TIMESHEET1 in the list.
> 5. The system working as expected but the terminal throws the following error
> {code}
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,631 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13
> |FlexibleStringExpander|W| Error evaluating scriptlet
> [${groovy:workEffortId!=void&&!"Totals".equals(workEffortId)?workEffortId:""}];
> error was: groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property:
> workEffortId for class: script1463806799411782919921
> [java] groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property:
> workEffortId for class: script1463806799411782919921
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.unwrap(ScriptBytecodeAdapter.java:53)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoGetPropertySite.getProperty(PogoGetPropertySite.java:52)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callGroovyObjectGetProperty(AbstractCallSite.java:307)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> and
> |W| Could not get a system property for widget.autocompleter.defaultDelay :
> null
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,732 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
> |E| XmlFileLoader: File
> file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
> process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
> 'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,795 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
> |E| XmlFileLoader: File
> file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
> process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
> 'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7115) Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
vaibhav jain updated OFBIZ-7115:
Attachment: OFBIZ-7154.patch
In the last patch is missing by mistake. So, here is the updated patch.
> Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7115
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: specialpurpose/projectmgr
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: vaibhav jain
>Assignee: Pranay Pandey
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7115.patch, OFBIZ-7154.patch
>
>
> Steps to regenerate (load the system with demo data)
> 1. Go to "PROJECT" menu (https://localhost:8443/projectmgr/control/main)
> 2. Select the 'Timesheet' sub-menu option
> 3. Click on "find" button.
> 4. Click on DEMO-TIMESHEET1 in the list.
> 5. The system working as expected but the terminal throws the following error
> {code}
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,631 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13
> |FlexibleStringExpander|W| Error evaluating scriptlet
> [${groovy:workEffortId!=void&&!"Totals".equals(workEffortId)?workEffortId:""}];
> error was: groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property:
> workEffortId for class: script1463806799411782919921
> [java] groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property:
> workEffortId for class: script1463806799411782919921
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.unwrap(ScriptBytecodeAdapter.java:53)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoGetPropertySite.getProperty(PogoGetPropertySite.java:52)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callGroovyObjectGetProperty(AbstractCallSite.java:307)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> and
> |W| Could not get a system property for widget.autocompleter.defaultDelay :
> null
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,732 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
> |E| XmlFileLoader: File
> file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
> process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
> 'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,795 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
> |E| XmlFileLoader: File
> file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
> process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
> 'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7184) 'Data Source Id' should be editable/visible on error view screen of createDataSource
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7184: Description: Steps to regenerate the issue Go to https://localhost:8443/marketing/control/main Click on sub-menu DataSource Click on create data source Hit "Save" button without filling input fields Instead of input field, label is shown Could not be found: [] was: Steps to regenerate the issue Go to https://localhost:8443/marketing/control/main Click on sub-menu DataSource Click on create data source Hit "Save" button without filling input fields > 'Data Source Id' should be editable/visible on error view screen of > createDataSource > > > Key: OFBIZ-7184 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7184 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Chandan Khandelwal > Attachments: screenshot-1.png > > > Steps to regenerate the issue > Go to https://localhost:8443/marketing/control/main > Click on sub-menu DataSource > Click on create data source > Hit "Save" button without filling input fields > Instead of input field, label is shown Could not be found: [] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7184) 'Data Source Id' should be editable/visible on error view screen of createDataSource
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7184: Description: Steps to regenerate the issue Go to https://localhost:8443/marketing/control/main Click on sub-menu DataSource Click on create data source Hit "Save" button without filling input fields Instead of input field, label is shown Could not be found: [] (Please refer screenshot for more details) was: Steps to regenerate the issue Go to https://localhost:8443/marketing/control/main Click on sub-menu DataSource Click on create data source Hit "Save" button without filling input fields Instead of input field, label is shown Could not be found: [] > 'Data Source Id' should be editable/visible on error view screen of > createDataSource > > > Key: OFBIZ-7184 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7184 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Chandan Khandelwal > Attachments: screenshot-1.png > > > Steps to regenerate the issue > Go to https://localhost:8443/marketing/control/main > Click on sub-menu DataSource > Click on create data source > Hit "Save" button without filling input fields > Instead of input field, label is shown Could not be found: [] > (Please refer screenshot for more details) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-7184) 'Data Source Id' should be editable/visible on error view screen of createDataSource
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain reassigned OFBIZ-7184: --- Assignee: Vaibhav Jain > 'Data Source Id' should be editable/visible on error view screen of > createDataSource > > > Key: OFBIZ-7184 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7184 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Chandan Khandelwal > Assignee: Vaibhav Jain > Attachments: screenshot-1.png > > > Steps to regenerate the issue > Go to https://localhost:8443/marketing/control/main > Click on sub-menu DataSource > Click on create data source > Hit "Save" button without filling input fields > Instead of input field, label is shown Could not be found: [] > (Please refer screenshot for more details) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-7170) Improvements in 'Find Shipment' screen to make it consistent with other find screens
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain reassigned OFBIZ-7170: --- Assignee: Vaibhav Jain > Improvements in 'Find Shipment' screen to make it consistent with other find > screens > > > Key: OFBIZ-7170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7170 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: product >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Chandan Khandelwal >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain >Priority: Minor > Attachments: screenshot-1.png > > > -- 'Find Shipment' button should be in screenlet-body > -- On find action, if no search result or single record found then it is > redirected to ViewShipment. > -- Use Like operator for 'Shipment Id' search constraint. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7170) Improvements in 'Find Shipment' screen to make it consistent with other find screens
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7170: Attachment: 7170.png Here is the screenshot of update UI > Improvements in 'Find Shipment' screen to make it consistent with other find > screens > > > Key: OFBIZ-7170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7170 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: product >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Chandan Khandelwal >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain >Priority: Minor > Attachments: 7170.png, OFBIZ-7170.patch, screenshot-1.png > > > # 'Find Shipment' button should be in screenlet-body > # On find action, if no search result or single record found then it is > redirected to ViewShipment. > # Use Like operator for 'Shipment Id' search constraint. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7170) Improvements in 'Find Shipment' screen to make it consistent with other find screens
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7170: Attachment: OFBIZ-7170.patch Here is the patch for the issue > Improvements in 'Find Shipment' screen to make it consistent with other find > screens > > > Key: OFBIZ-7170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7170 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: product >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Chandan Khandelwal >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-7170.patch, screenshot-1.png > > > # 'Find Shipment' button should be in screenlet-body > # On find action, if no search result or single record found then it is > redirected to ViewShipment. > # Use Like operator for 'Shipment Id' search constraint. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7115) Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
vaibhav jain created OFBIZ-7115:
---
Summary: Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on
terminal
Key: OFBIZ-7115
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: specialpurpose/projectmgr
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: vaibhav jain
Assignee: vaibhav jain
Priority: Minor
Steps to regenerate (load the system with demo data)
1. Go to "PROJECT" menu (https://localhost:8443/projectmgr/control/main)
2. Select the 'Timesheet' sub-menu option
3. Click on "find" button.
4. Click on DEMO-TIMESHEET1 in the list.
5. The system working as expected but the terminal throws the following error
__
[java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,631 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |FlexibleStringExpander
|W| Error evaluating scriptlet
[${groovy:workEffortId!=void&&!"Totals".equals(workEffortId)?workEffortId:""}];
error was: groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: workEffortId
for class: script1463806799411782919921
[java] groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: workEffortId
for class: script1463806799411782919921
[java] at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.unwrap(ScriptBytecodeAdapter.java:53)
~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
[java] at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoGetPropertySite.getProperty(PogoGetPropertySite.java:52)
~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
[java] at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callGroovyObjectGetProperty(AbstractCallSite.java:307)
~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
and
|W| Could not get a system property for widget.autocompleter.defaultDelay : null
[java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,732 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
|E| XmlFileLoader: File
file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
[java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,795 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
|E| XmlFileLoader: File
file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
__
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7115) Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
vaibhav jain updated OFBIZ-7115:
Description:
Steps to regenerate (load the system with demo data)
1. Go to "PROJECT" menu (https://localhost:8443/projectmgr/control/main)
2. Select the 'Timesheet' sub-menu option
3. Click on "find" button.
4. Click on DEMO-TIMESHEET1 in the list.
5. The system working as expected but the terminal throws the following error
{code}
[java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,631 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |FlexibleStringExpander
|W| Error evaluating scriptlet
[${groovy:workEffortId!=void&&!"Totals".equals(workEffortId)?workEffortId:""}];
error was: groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: workEffortId
for class: script1463806799411782919921
[java] groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: workEffortId
for class: script1463806799411782919921
[java] at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.unwrap(ScriptBytecodeAdapter.java:53)
~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
[java] at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoGetPropertySite.getProperty(PogoGetPropertySite.java:52)
~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
[java] at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callGroovyObjectGetProperty(AbstractCallSite.java:307)
~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
and
|W| Could not get a system property for widget.autocompleter.defaultDelay : null
[java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,732 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
|E| XmlFileLoader: File
file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
[java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,795 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
|E| XmlFileLoader: File
file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
{code}
was:
Steps to regenerate (load the system with demo data)
1. Go to "PROJECT" menu (https://localhost:8443/projectmgr/control/main)
2. Select the 'Timesheet' sub-menu option
3. Click on "find" button.
4. Click on DEMO-TIMESHEET1 in the list.
5. The system working as expected but the terminal throws the following error
__
[java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,631 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |FlexibleStringExpander
|W| Error evaluating scriptlet
[${groovy:workEffortId!=void&&!"Totals".equals(workEffortId)?workEffortId:""}];
error was: groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: workEffortId
for class: script1463806799411782919921
[java] groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: workEffortId
for class: script1463806799411782919921
[java] at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.unwrap(ScriptBytecodeAdapter.java:53)
~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
[java] at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoGetPropertySite.getProperty(PogoGetPropertySite.java:52)
~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
[java] at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callGroovyObjectGetProperty(AbstractCallSite.java:307)
~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
and
|W| Could not get a system property for widget.autocompleter.defaultDelay : null
[java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,732 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
|E| XmlFileLoader: File
file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
[java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,795 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
|E| XmlFileLoader: File
file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
__
> Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7115
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: specialpurpose/projectmgr
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: vaibhav jain
>Assignee: vaibhav jain
>Priority: Minor
>
> Steps to regenerate (load the system with demo data)
> 1. Go to "PROJECT" menu (https://localhost:8443/projectmgr/control/main)
> 2. Select the 'Timesheet' sub-menu option
> 3
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7333) UI improvement on find requirement page of ORDER component
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7333: Attachment: before.png > UI improvement on find requirement page of ORDER component > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7333 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: order > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain >Priority: Minor > Attachments: after.png, before.png > > > Steps to regenerate the issue: > 1. Go to order manager. > 2. Go to sub-menu "Requirements" > 3. Sub-menu of "Requirements" are not looking good. > 4. "Find Requirement" title is not looking good. > 5. Buttons and title should be consistent. > (Please refer screenshots for more detail) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7333) UI improvement on find requirement page of ORDER component
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7333: --- Summary: UI improvement on find requirement page of ORDER component Key: OFBIZ-7333 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7333 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: order Reporter: Vaibhav Jain Assignee: Vaibhav Jain Priority: Minor Steps to regenerate the issue: 1. Go to order manager. 2. Go to sub-menu "Requirements" 3. Sub-menu of "Requirements" are not looking good. 4. "Find Requirement" title is not looking good. 5. Buttons and title should be consistent. (Please refer screenshots for more detail) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7333) UI improvement on find requirement page of ORDER component
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7333: Attachment: after.png > UI improvement on find requirement page of ORDER component > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7333 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: order > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain >Priority: Minor > Attachments: after.png, before.png > > > Steps to regenerate the issue: > 1. Go to order manager. > 2. Go to sub-menu "Requirements" > 3. Sub-menu of "Requirements" are not looking good. > 4. "Find Requirement" title is not looking good. > 5. Buttons and title should be consistent. > (Please refer screenshots for more detail) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7170) Improvements in 'Find Shipment' screen to make it consistent with other find screens
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7170: Attachment: OFBIZ-7170.patch Hello Pranay, Thank you for reviewing the patch.Updated patch is attached with the issue. > Improvements in 'Find Shipment' screen to make it consistent with other find > screens > > > Key: OFBIZ-7170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7170 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: product >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Chandan Khandelwal >Assignee: Pranay Pandey >Priority: Minor > Attachments: 7170.png, OFBIZ-7170.patch, OFBIZ-7170.patch, > screenshot-1.png > > > # 'Find Shipment' button should be in screenlet-body > # On find action, if no search result or single record found then it is > redirected to ViewShipment. > # Use Like operator for 'Shipment Id' search constraint. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7184) 'Data Source Id' should be editable/visible on error view screen of createDataSource
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7184: Description: Steps to regenerate the issue Go to https://localhost:8443/marketing/control/main Click on sub-menu DataSource Click on create data source Hit "Save" button without filling input fields > 'Data Source Id' should be editable/visible on error view screen of > createDataSource > > > Key: OFBIZ-7184 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7184 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Chandan Khandelwal > Attachments: screenshot-1.png > > > Steps to regenerate the issue > Go to https://localhost:8443/marketing/control/main > Click on sub-menu DataSource > Click on create data source > Hit "Save" button without filling input fields -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7115) Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
vaibhav jain updated OFBIZ-7115:
Attachment: OFBIZ-7115.patch
Here is the patch
> Timesheet overview page of projectmgr throw error on terminal
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7115
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7115
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: specialpurpose/projectmgr
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: vaibhav jain
>Assignee: Pranay Pandey
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7115.patch
>
>
> Steps to regenerate (load the system with demo data)
> 1. Go to "PROJECT" menu (https://localhost:8443/projectmgr/control/main)
> 2. Select the 'Timesheet' sub-menu option
> 3. Click on "find" button.
> 4. Click on DEMO-TIMESHEET1 in the list.
> 5. The system working as expected but the terminal throws the following error
> {code}
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,631 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13
> |FlexibleStringExpander|W| Error evaluating scriptlet
> [${groovy:workEffortId!=void&&!"Totals".equals(workEffortId)?workEffortId:""}];
> error was: groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property:
> workEffortId for class: script1463806799411782919921
> [java] groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property:
> workEffortId for class: script1463806799411782919921
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.unwrap(ScriptBytecodeAdapter.java:53)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoGetPropertySite.getProperty(PogoGetPropertySite.java:52)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> [java] at
> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callGroovyObjectGetProperty(AbstractCallSite.java:307)
> ~[groovy-all-2.4.5.jar:2.4.5]
> and
> |W| Could not get a system property for widget.autocompleter.defaultDelay :
> null
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,732 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
> |E| XmlFileLoader: File
> file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
> process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
> 'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
> [java] 2016-05-21 18:25:47,795 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-13 |UtilXml
> |E| XmlFileLoader: File
> file:/home/common/ofbiz/specialpurpose/projectmgr/widget/forms/TimeSheetForms.xml
> process error. Line: 209. Error message: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute
> 'value-field' must appear on element 'entity-one'.
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-7154) Update Survey Question is not working from the list of SurveyQuestionAppl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vaibhav jain reassigned OFBIZ-7154: --- Assignee: vaibhav jain (was: Swapnil M Mane) > Update Survey Question is not working from the list of SurveyQuestionAppl > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7154 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: content >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Swapnil M Mane > Assignee: vaibhav jain > Attachments: ui_improvement.png, update_question.png > > > Steps to regenerate: > 1.) Find Survey (https://localhost:8443/content/control/FindSurvey) > 2.) Open any Survey > 3.) Select the sub-menu 'Questions' > 4.) In 'Edit Survey Questions Survey ID' section, Question field is editable. > 5.) Edit the Question detail in this field. > 6.) Use the Update option in the row. > 7.) The question doesn't get updated. > Please find the screenshot (update_question.png) for more details. > Also, it has minor UI improvement, > 1.) Select the 'Edit Question' option in 'Edit Survey Questions Survey ID #' > section > 2.) Now, in the 'Edit Question' section below, the submit button title should > be 'Update' instead of 'Create' > Please refer screenshot (ui_improvement.png) for more details. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7366) FTL formatting in the whole application
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7366: --- Summary: FTL formatting in the whole application Key: OFBIZ-7366 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7366 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: ALL APPLICATIONS Reporter: Vaibhav Jain Assignee: Pranay Pandey There is a formatting issue in the most of FTL files in OFBiz. We need to format the code as per best practice to make it more readable. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7406) Find Projects throw "EntityListIterator Not Closed for Entity" error on terminal
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7406:
---
Summary: Find Projects throw "EntityListIterator Not Closed for
Entity" error on terminal
Key: OFBIZ-7406
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7406
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: specialpurpose/projectmgr
Reporter: Vaibhav Jain
Assignee: Vaibhav Jain
Priority: Minor
Steps to regenerate issue:
1. Go to PROJECTS component
2. Click on sub-menu "Projects"
3. Click on find button
#Browse the link:
https://localhost:8443/projectmgr/control/FindProject
{code}
[java] 2016-06-18 11:06:18,741 |Finalizer|SQLProcessor
|E| Error closing the result, connection, etc in finalize SQLProcessor
[java] java.lang.NullPointerException
[java] at
org.apache.commons.dbcp2.DelegatingConnection.closeInternal(DelegatingConnection.java:235)
~[commons-dbcp2-2.1.jar:2.1]
[java] at
org.apache.commons.dbcp2.DelegatingConnection.close(DelegatingConnection.java:218)
~[commons-dbcp2-2.1.jar:2.1]
[java] at
org.apache.commons.dbcp2.managed.ManagedConnection.close(ManagedConnection.java:166)
~[commons-dbcp2-2.1.jar:2.1]
[java] at org.ofbiz.entity.jdbc.SQLProcessor.close(SQLProcessor.java:235)
~[ofbiz-entity.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.entity.jdbc.SQLProcessor.finalize(SQLProcessor.java:844)
[ofbiz-entity.jar:?]
[java] at java.lang.System$2.invokeFinalize(System.java:1270) [?:1.8.0_66]
[java] at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.runFinalizer(Finalizer.java:98)
[?:1.8.0_66]
[java] at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.access$100(Finalizer.java:34) [?:1.8.0_66]
[java] at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:210)
[?:1.8.0_66]
[java] 2016-06-18 11:06:18,742 |Finalizer|EntityListIterator
|E|
[java]
[java] EntityListIterator Not Closed for Entity
[WorkEffortAndPartyAssign], caught in Finalize
[java]
[java]
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7333) Correct location of New Requirement button on Requirements view
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7333: Attachment: OFBIZ-7333.patch Here is the patch for the UI improvement > Correct location of New Requirement button on Requirements view > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7333 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: order > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Assignee: Pranay Pandey >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-7333.patch, after.png, before.png > > > Steps to regenerate the issue: > 1. Go to order manager. > 2. Go to sub-menu "Requirements" > 3. Find Requirements view is having New Requirement button placed at wrong > position. > Please refer screenshots for more detail. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7365) fonts.pdf Throw error on terminal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7365:
Description:
Steps to regenerate the issue:
1. Go to "EXAMPLE" component.
2. Click on sub-menu "FOP fonts in a PDF"
_
Direct link
https://localhost:8443/example/control/fonts.pdf
_
{code}
[java] 2016-06-13 19:25:34,639 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-10 |ScreenFopViewHandler
|E| Unable to write to OutputStream:
org.apache.catalina.connector.ClientAbortException: java.io.IOException: Broken
pipe; Screen XSL:FO text was:
[java]
[java] 2016-06-13 19:25:35,084 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-10 |ScreenFopViewHandler
|E| Multiple errors rendering FOP
[java] 2016-06-13 19:25:35,085 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-10 |ControlServlet
|E| Error in request handler:
[java] java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOutputStream() has already been
called for this response
[java] at
org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.getWriter(Response.java:564)
~[tomcat-8.0.33-catalina.jar:8.0.33]
[java] at
org.apache.catalina.connector.ResponseFacade.getWriter(ResponseFacade.java:212)
~[tomcat-8.0.33-catalina.jar:8.0.33]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.fo.ScreenFopViewHandler.renderError(ScreenFopViewHandler.java:191)
~[ofbiz-widget.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.fo.ScreenFopViewHandler.render(ScreenFopViewHandler.java:174)
~[ofbiz-widget.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.renderView(RequestHandler.java:1001)
~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:653)
~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlServlet.doGet(ControlServlet.java:213)
[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
[java] at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:622)
[servlet-api-3.1.jar:?]
[java] at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729)
[servlet-api-3.1.jar:?]
{code}
was:
Steps to regenerate the issue:
1. Go to "EXAMPLE" component.
2. Click on sub-menu "FOP fonts in a PDF"
_
Direct link
https://ofbiz-trunk.hotwaxsystems.com/example/control/fonts.pdf
_
{code}
[java] 2016-06-13 19:25:34,639 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-10 |ScreenFopViewHandler
|E| Unable to write to OutputStream:
org.apache.catalina.connector.ClientAbortException: java.io.IOException: Broken
pipe; Screen XSL:FO text was:
[java]
[java] 2016-06-13 19:25:35,084 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-10 |ScreenFopViewHandler
|E| Multiple errors rendering FOP
[java] 2016-06-13 19:25:35,085 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-10 |ControlServlet
|E| Error in request handler:
[java] java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOutputStream() has already been
called for this response
[java] at
org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.getWriter(Response.java:564)
~[tomcat-8.0.33-catalina.jar:8.0.33]
[java] at
org.apache.catalina.connector.ResponseFacade.getWriter(ResponseFacade.java:212)
~[tomcat-8.0.33-catalina.jar:8.0.33]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.fo.ScreenFopViewHandler.renderError(ScreenFopViewHandler.java:191)
~[ofbiz-widget.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.fo.ScreenFopViewHandler.render(ScreenFopViewHandler.java:174)
~[ofbiz-widget.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.renderView(RequestHandler.java:1001)
~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:653)
~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlServlet.doGet(ControlServlet.java:213)
[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
[java] at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:622)
[servlet-api-3.1.jar:?]
[java] at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729)
[servlet-api-3.1.jar:?]
{code}
> fonts.pdf Throw error on terminal
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7365
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: specialpurpose/example
>Reporter: Vaibhav Jain
>Assignee: Pranay Pandey
>
> Steps to regenerate the issue:
> 1. Go to "EXAMPLE" component.
> 2. Click on sub-menu "FOP fonts in a PDF"
> _
> Direct link
> https://localhost:8443/example/control/fonts.pdf
> _
> {code}
> [java] 2016-06-13 19:25:34,639 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-10 |ScreenFopViewHandler
> |E| Unable to write to O
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7365) fonts.pdf Throw error on terminal
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7365:
---
Summary: fonts.pdf Throw error on terminal
Key: OFBIZ-7365
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7365
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: specialpurpose/example
Reporter: Vaibhav Jain
Assignee: Pranay Pandey
Steps to regenerate the issue:
1. Go to "EXAMPLE" component.
2. Click on sub-menu "FOP fonts in a PDF"
_
Direct link
https://ofbiz-trunk.hotwaxsystems.com/example/control/fonts.pdf
_
{code}
[java] 2016-06-13 19:25:34,639 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-10 |ScreenFopViewHandler
|E| Unable to write to OutputStream:
org.apache.catalina.connector.ClientAbortException: java.io.IOException: Broken
pipe; Screen XSL:FO text was:
[java]
[java] 2016-06-13 19:25:35,084 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-10 |ScreenFopViewHandler
|E| Multiple errors rendering FOP
[java] 2016-06-13 19:25:35,085 |ttp-nio-8443-exec-10 |ControlServlet
|E| Error in request handler:
[java] java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOutputStream() has already been
called for this response
[java] at
org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.getWriter(Response.java:564)
~[tomcat-8.0.33-catalina.jar:8.0.33]
[java] at
org.apache.catalina.connector.ResponseFacade.getWriter(ResponseFacade.java:212)
~[tomcat-8.0.33-catalina.jar:8.0.33]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.fo.ScreenFopViewHandler.renderError(ScreenFopViewHandler.java:191)
~[ofbiz-widget.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.widget.renderer.fo.ScreenFopViewHandler.render(ScreenFopViewHandler.java:174)
~[ofbiz-widget.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.renderView(RequestHandler.java:1001)
~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:653)
~[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
[java] at
org.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlServlet.doGet(ControlServlet.java:213)
[ofbiz-webapp.jar:?]
[java] at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:622)
[servlet-api-3.1.jar:?]
[java] at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729)
[servlet-api-3.1.jar:?]
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6789) image management cannot share images
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vaibhav jain updated OFBIZ-6789: Attachment: OFBIZ-6789.patch Fix is attached as a patch of the issue. > image management cannot share images > > > Key: OFBIZ-6789 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6789 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: product >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Wai > Attachments: OFBIZ-6789.patch > > > -go to https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/Imagemanagement > -upload an image for a product > -go to https://localhost:8443/catalog/control/ListImageGallery > -select the product in question > -notice that clicking the 'share' button does nothing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7636) FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7636: --- Summary: FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7636 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7636 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: framework Reporter: Vaibhav Jain Assignee: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7645) Web POS : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7645: --- Summary: Web POS : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7645 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7645 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: specialpurpose/webpos Reporter: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7637) FTL formating
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7637: --- Summary: FTL formating Key: OFBIZ-7637 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7637 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: accounting Reporter: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7639) Manufacturing:FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7639: --- Summary: Manufacturing:FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7639 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7639 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: manufacturing Reporter: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7638) Content:FTL formatting
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7638: Summary: Content:FTL formatting (was: FTL formatting) > Content:FTL formatting > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-7638 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7638 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: content > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7637) Accounting:FTL formating
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7637: Summary: Accounting:FTL formating (was: FTL formating) > Accounting:FTL formating > > > Key: OFBIZ-7637 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7637 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: accounting > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7642) Product : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7642: --- Summary: Product : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7642 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7642 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: product Reporter: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7643) Work Effort : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7643: --- Summary: Work Effort : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7643 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7643 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: workeffort Reporter: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7644) E-commerce : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7644: --- Summary: E-commerce : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7644 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7644 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce Reporter: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7645) Web POS : FTL formatting
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7645: Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) Parent: OFBIZ-7366 > Web POS : FTL formatting > > > Key: OFBIZ-7645 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7645 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: specialpurpose/webpos > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7640) Order : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7640: --- Summary: Order : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7640 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7640 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: order Reporter: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7638) FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7638: --- Summary: FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7638 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7638 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: content Reporter: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7641) Party : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7641: --- Summary: Party : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7641 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7641 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: party Reporter: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7646) Scrum : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7646: --- Summary: Scrum : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7646 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7646 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/scrum Reporter: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6930) HumanResDemoData.xml doesn't load
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15202723#comment-15202723 ] vaibhav jain commented on OFBIZ-6930: - Hi Pierre Smits, I run the command ./ant load-demo and data of HumanResDemoData.xml is loaded successfully on both MySQL and Derby. Following are the details of my local box: OFBiz Version: Trunk Mysql version: 5.5.47 Operating System: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS > HumanResDemoData.xml doesn't load > - > > Key: OFBIZ-6930 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6930 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: humanres >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Pierre Smits > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7949) E-commerce : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7949: --- Summary: E-commerce : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7949 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7949 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce Reporter: Vaibhav Jain Assignee: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7864) Ebaystore : FTL formatting
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7864: Attachment: OFBIZ-7864.patch Here is the patch for formatted files of Ebaystore component > Ebaystore : FTL formatting > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-7864 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7864 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: specialpurpose/ebaystore > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain > Attachments: OFBIZ-7864.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7864) Ebaystore : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7864: --- Summary: Ebaystore : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7864 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7864 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/ebaystore Reporter: Vaibhav Jain Assignee: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7863) Ebay : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7863: --- Summary: Ebay : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7863 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7863 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/ebay Reporter: Vaibhav Jain Assignee: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7863) Ebay : FTL formatting
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7863: Attachment: OFBIZ-7863.patch Here is the patch for formatted file of eBay component > Ebay : FTL formatting > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7863 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: specialpurpose/ebay > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain > Attachments: OFBIZ-7863.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7865) Example : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7865: --- Summary: Example : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7865 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7865 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/example Reporter: Vaibhav Jain Assignee: Vaibhav Jain -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7865) Example : FTL formatting
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7865: Attachment: OFBIZ-7865.patch Here is the patch for formatted file of Example component > Example : FTL formatting > > > Key: OFBIZ-7865 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7865 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: specialpurpose/example > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain > Attachments: OFBIZ-7865.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7333) Correct location of New Requirement button on Requirements view
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7333: Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) Parent: OFBIZ-7661 > Correct location of New Requirement button on Requirements view > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7333 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: order > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Assignee: Pranay Pandey >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-7333.patch, after.png, before.png > > > Steps to regenerate the issue: > 1. Go to order manager. > 2. Go to sub-menu "Requirements" > 3. Find Requirements view is having New Requirement button placed at wrong > position. > Please refer screenshots for more detail. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7636) Framework : FTL formatting
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7636: Attachment: OFBIZ-7636.patch Here is the patch for formatted FTL files of framework component > Framework : FTL formatting > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-7636 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7636 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: framework > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain > Attachments: OFBIZ-7636.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7863) Ebay : FTL formatting
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7863: Attachment: OFBIZ-7863.patch Thanks Pranay for reviewing the patch. Here is the updated patch > Ebay : FTL formatting > - > > Key: OFBIZ-7863 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7863 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: specialpurpose/ebay > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain > Attachments: OFBIZ-7863.patch, OFBIZ-7863.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7678) BI : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7678: --- Summary: BI : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7678 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7678 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/bi Reporter: Vaibhav Jain Assignee: Vaibhav Jain Priority: Minor -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7679) Asset Maintenance : FTL formatting
Vaibhav Jain created OFBIZ-7679: --- Summary: Asset Maintenance : FTL formatting Key: OFBIZ-7679 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7679 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: specialpurpose/assetmaint Reporter: Vaibhav Jain Assignee: Vaibhav Jain Priority: Minor -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7679) Asset Maintenance : FTL formatting
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-7679: Attachment: OFBIZ-7679.patch Here is the patch for formatted files of Asset maintenance component > Asset Maintenance : FTL formatting > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-7679 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7679 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: specialpurpose/assetmaint > Reporter: Vaibhav Jain >Assignee: Vaibhav Jain >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-7679.patch > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
