Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Xiangrui Meng]

+1 from myself.

The vote passed with the following +1s and no -1s:

* Denny Lee
* Jules Damji
* Xiao Li*
* Dongjoon Hyun
* Mingjie Tang
* Yanbo Liang*
* Marco Gaido
* Joseph Bradley*
* Xiangrui Meng*

I will send a result email soon. Please watch SPARK-25994 for future
discussions. Thanks!

Best,
Xiangrui


On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:14 PM Joseph Bradley 
wrote:

> +1  This will be a great long-term investment for Spark.
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:44 AM Marco Gaido  wrote:
>
>> +1 from me as well.
>>
>> Il giorno mer 6 feb 2019 alle ore 16:58 Yanbo Liang 
>> ha scritto:
>>
>>> +1 for the proposal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:46 PM Mingjie Tang 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 +1, this is a very very important feature.

 Mingjie

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:42 AM Xiao Li  wrote:

> Change my vote from +1 to ++1
>
> Xiangrui Meng  于2019年1月30日周三 上午6:20写道：
>
>> Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for
>> the offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation
>> 
>> of fraction values:
>>
>> The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting
>> individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in
>> which they might be intended and interpreted:
>> +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.'
>> -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'
>> -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational
>> justification for my feelings.'
>> ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!'
>> -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the
>> way if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.'
>> +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the
>> skills necessary to help out.'
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dongjoon,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly.
>>>
>>> I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch
>>> docs so that anyone can comment.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Martin
>>> On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Xiangrui Meng.
>>>
>>> +1 for the proposal.
>>>
>>> However, please update the following section for this vote. As we
>>> see, it seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost
>>> February).
>>> (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.)
>>>
>>> Q7. How long will it take?
>>>
>>>-
>>>
>>>If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we
>>>predict to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA 
>>> during
>>>April 2019, making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release 
>>> (3.0, ETA
>>>May, 2019).
>>>
>>> Bests,
>>> Dongjoon.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 +1

 Jules Damji  于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道：

> +1 (non-binding)
> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London.
> Well attended & well received.)
>
> —
> Sent from my iPhone
> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)
>
> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee 
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> yay - let's do it!
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
>> . It
>> introduces a new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports
>> property graph construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. 
>> The
>> proposal
>> 
>> was made available on user@
>> 
>> and dev@
>> 
>>  to
>> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to
>> SPARK-26028 .
>>
>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your
>> vote:
>>
>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
>> +0: Don't really care.
>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following
>> technical reasons.
>>
>> Best,
>> Xiangrui
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Joseph 

Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Joseph Bradley]

+1  This will be a great long-term investment for Spark.

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:44 AM Marco Gaido  wrote:

> +1 from me as well.
>
> Il giorno mer 6 feb 2019 alle ore 16:58 Yanbo Liang 
> ha scritto:
>
>> +1 for the proposal
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:46 PM Mingjie Tang  wrote:
>>
>>> +1, this is a very very important feature.
>>>
>>> Mingjie
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:42 AM Xiao Li  wrote:
>>>
 Change my vote from +1 to ++1

 Xiangrui Meng  于2019年1月30日周三 上午6:20写道：

> Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for
> the offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation
> 
> of fraction values:
>
> The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting
> individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in
> which they might be intended and interpreted:
> +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.'
> -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'
> -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational
> justification for my feelings.'
> ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!'
> -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way
> if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.'
> +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the
> skills necessary to help out.'
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns
>  wrote:
>
>> Hi Dongjoon,
>>
>> Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly.
>>
>> I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch
>> docs so that anyone can comment.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Martin
>> On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Xiangrui Meng.
>>
>> +1 for the proposal.
>>
>> However, please update the following section for this vote. As we
>> see, it seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost
>> February).
>> (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.)
>>
>> Q7. How long will it take?
>>
>>-
>>
>>If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we
>>predict to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA 
>> during
>>April 2019, making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release 
>> (3.0, ETA
>>May, 2019).
>>
>> Bests,
>> Dongjoon.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li  wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Jules Damji  于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道：
>>>
 +1 (non-binding)
 (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London.
 Well attended & well received.)

 —
 Sent from my iPhone
 Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)

 On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee 
 wrote:

 +1

 yay - let's do it!

 On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng 
 wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
> . It
> introduces a new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports
> property graph construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The
> proposal
> 
> was made available on user@
> 
> and dev@
> 
>  to
> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to
> SPARK-26028 .
>
> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your
> vote:
>
> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
> +0: Don't really care.
> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following
> technical reasons.
>
> Best,
> Xiangrui
>


-- 

Joseph Bradley

Software Engineer - Machine Learning

Databricks, Inc.

[image: http://databricks.com] 

Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Marco Gaido]

+1 from me as well.

Il giorno mer 6 feb 2019 alle ore 16:58 Yanbo Liang  ha
scritto:

> +1 for the proposal
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:46 PM Mingjie Tang  wrote:
>
>> +1, this is a very very important feature.
>>
>> Mingjie
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:42 AM Xiao Li  wrote:
>>
>>> Change my vote from +1 to ++1
>>>
>>> Xiangrui Meng  于2019年1月30日周三 上午6:20写道：
>>>
 Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for
 the offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation
 
 of fraction values:

 The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting
 individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in
 which they might be intended and interpreted:
 +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.'
 -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'
 -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational
 justification for my feelings.'
 ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!'
 -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way
 if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.'
 +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the
 skills necessary to help out.'


 On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns
  wrote:

> Hi Dongjoon,
>
> Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly.
>
> I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch
> docs so that anyone can comment.
>
> Best,
>
> Martin
> On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
>
> Hi, Xiangrui Meng.
>
> +1 for the proposal.
>
> However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see,
> it seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February).
> (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.)
>
> Q7. How long will it take?
>
>-
>
>If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we
>predict to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA during
>April 2019, making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release (3.0, 
> ETA
>May, 2019).
>
> Bests,
> Dongjoon.
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Jules Damji  于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道：
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London.
>>> Well attended & well received.)
>>>
>>> —
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)
>>>
>>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> yay - let's do it!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
 . It introduces
 a new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph
 construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal
 
 was made available on user@
 
 and dev@
 
  to
 collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to
 SPARK-26028 .

 The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your
 vote:

 +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
 +0: Don't really care.
 -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following
 technical reasons.

 Best,
 Xiangrui

>>>

Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Yanbo Liang]

+1 for the proposal



On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:46 PM Mingjie Tang  wrote:

> +1, this is a very very important feature.
>
> Mingjie
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:42 AM Xiao Li  wrote:
>
>> Change my vote from +1 to ++1
>>
>> Xiangrui Meng  于2019年1月30日周三 上午6:20写道：
>>
>>> Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for
>>> the offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation
>>> 
>>> of fraction values:
>>>
>>> The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting
>>> individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in
>>> which they might be intended and interpreted:
>>> +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.'
>>> -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'
>>> -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational
>>> justification for my feelings.'
>>> ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!'
>>> -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way
>>> if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.'
>>> +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the
>>> skills necessary to help out.'
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Dongjoon,

 Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly.

 I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch
 docs so that anyone can comment.

 Best,

 Martin
 On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:

 Hi, Xiangrui Meng.

 +1 for the proposal.

 However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see,
 it seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February).
 (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.)

 Q7. How long will it take?

-

If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we
predict to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA during
April 2019, making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release (3.0, 
 ETA
May, 2019).

 Bests,
 Dongjoon.

 On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li  wrote:

> +1
>
> Jules Damji  于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道：
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. Well
>> attended & well received.)
>>
>> —
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee  wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> yay - let's do it!
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
>>> . It introduces
>>> a new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph
>>> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal
>>> 
>>> was made available on user@
>>> 
>>> and dev@
>>> 
>>>  to
>>> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to
>>> SPARK-26028 .
>>>
>>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your
>>> vote:
>>>
>>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
>>> +0: Don't really care.
>>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following
>>> technical reasons.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Xiangrui
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Xiao Li]

Change my vote from +1 to ++1

Xiangrui Meng  于2019年1月30日周三 上午6:20写道：

> Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for the
> offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation
> 
> of fraction values:
>
> The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting individual
> feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in which they
> might be intended and interpreted:
> +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.'
> -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'
> -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational justification
> for my feelings.'
> ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!'
> -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way if
> everyone else wants to go ahead with it.'
> +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the skills
> necessary to help out.'
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns
>  wrote:
>
>> Hi Dongjoon,
>>
>> Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly.
>>
>> I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch docs
>> so that anyone can comment.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Martin
>> On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Xiangrui Meng.
>>
>> +1 for the proposal.
>>
>> However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see, it
>> seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February).
>> (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.)
>>
>> Q7. How long will it take?
>>
>>-
>>
>>If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we predict
>>to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA during April 
>> 2019,
>>making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release (3.0, ETA May, 2019).
>>
>> Bests,
>> Dongjoon.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li  wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Jules Damji  于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道：
>>>
 +1 (non-binding)
 (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. Well
 attended & well received.)

 —
 Sent from my iPhone
 Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)

 On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee  wrote:

 +1

 yay - let's do it!

 On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
> . It introduces a
> new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph
> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal
> 
> was made available on user@
> 
> and dev@
> 
>  to
> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to
> SPARK-26028 .
>
> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote:
>
> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
> +0: Don't really care.
> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following
> technical reasons.
>
> Best,
> Xiangrui
>

Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Xiangrui Meng]

Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for the
offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation

of fraction values:

The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting individual
feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in which they
might be intended and interpreted:
+0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.'
-0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'
-0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational justification
for my feelings.'
++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!'
-0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way if
everyone else wants to go ahead with it.'
+0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the skills
necessary to help out.'


On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns
 wrote:

> Hi Dongjoon,
>
> Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly.
>
> I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch docs
> so that anyone can comment.
>
> Best,
>
> Martin
> On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
>
> Hi, Xiangrui Meng.
>
> +1 for the proposal.
>
> However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see, it
> seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February).
> (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.)
>
> Q7. How long will it take?
>
>-
>
>If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we predict
>to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA during April 2019,
>making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release (3.0, ETA May, 2019).
>
> Bests,
> Dongjoon.
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Jules Damji  于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道：
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. Well
>>> attended & well received.)
>>>
>>> —
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)
>>>
>>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee  wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> yay - let's do it!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng  wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
 . It introduces a
 new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph
 construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal
 
 was made available on user@
 
 and dev@
 
  to
 collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to
 SPARK-26028 .

 The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote:

 +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
 +0: Don't really care.
 -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following
 technical reasons.

 Best,
 Xiangrui

>>>

Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Martin Junghanns]

Hi Dongjoon,

Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly.

I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch 
docs so that anyone can comment.


Best,

Martin

On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:

Hi, Xiangrui Meng.

+1 for the proposal.

However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see, 
it seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February).

(Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.)

Q7. How long will it take?

 *

If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we
predict to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA
during April 2019, making the SPIP part of the next major Spark
release (3.0, ETA May, 2019).

Bests,
Dongjoon.

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li > wrote:


+1

Jules Damji mailto:dmat...@comcast.net>>
于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道：

+1 (non-binding)
(Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in
London. Well attended & well received.)

—
Sent from my iPhone
Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)

On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee mailto:denny.g@gmail.com>> wrote:


+1

yay - let's do it!

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng
mailto:men...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi all,

I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
. It
introduces a new DataFrame-based component to Spark,
which supports property graph construction, Cypher
queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal


was made available on user@


and dev@


 to
collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc
attached to SPARK-26028
.

The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply
with your vote:

+1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
+0: Don't really care.
-1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the
following technical reasons.

Best,
Xiangrui

Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Dongjoon Hyun]

Hi, Xiangrui Meng.

+1 for the proposal.

However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see, it
seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February).
(Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.)

Q7. How long will it take?


   -

   If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we predict to
   be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA during April 2019,
   making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release (3.0, ETA May, 2019).


Bests,
Dongjoon.


On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li  wrote:

> +1
>
> Jules Damji  于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道：
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. Well
>> attended & well received.)
>>
>> —
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee  wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> yay - let's do it!
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
>>> . It introduces a
>>> new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph
>>> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal
>>> 
>>> was made available on user@
>>> 
>>> and dev@
>>> 
>>>  to
>>> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to
>>> SPARK-26028 .
>>>
>>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote:
>>>
>>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
>>> +0: Don't really care.
>>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following technical
>>> reasons.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Xiangrui
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Xiao Li]

+1

Jules Damji  于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道：

> +1 (non-binding)
> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. Well
> attended & well received.)
>
> —
> Sent from my iPhone
> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)
>
> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> yay - let's do it!
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
>> . It introduces a new
>> DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph
>> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal
>> 
>> was made available on user@
>> 
>> and dev@
>> 
>>  to
>> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to
>> SPARK-26028 .
>>
>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote:
>>
>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
>> +0: Don't really care.
>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following technical
>> reasons.
>>
>> Best,
>> Xiangrui
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Jules Damji]

+1 (non-binding) 
(Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. Well attended 
& well received.)

—
Sent from my iPhone
Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)

> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee  wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> yay - let's do it! 
> 
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994. It introduces a new 
>> DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph 
>> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal was made 
>> available on user@ and dev@ to collect input. You can also find a sketch 
>> design doc attached to SPARK-26028.
>> 
>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote:
>> 
>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
>> +0: Don't really care.
>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following technical 
>> reasons.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Xiangrui

Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Denny Lee]

+1

yay - let's do it!

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
> . It introduces a new
> DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph
> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal
> 
> was made available on user@
> 
> and dev@
> 
>  to
> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to
> SPARK-26028 .
>
> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote:
>
> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
> +0: Don't really care.
> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following technical
> reasons.
>
> Best,
> Xiangrui
>

[VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms

[Xiangrui Meng]

Hi all,

I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
. It introduces a new
DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph
construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal

was made available on user@

and dev@

to
collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to SPARK-26028
.

The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote:

+1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
+0: Don't really care.
-1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following technical
reasons.

Best,
Xiangrui