[Bug 1307197] perl-Module-CPANfile-1.1002 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307197



--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  ---
No. Suitable for Fedora >= 24. Because that's the oldest Fedora with previous
version.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1307197] perl-Module-CPANfile-1.1002 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307197

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CPANfile-1.1002
   ||-1.fc24



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
Fixes running in taint mode. Suitable for all Fedoras.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Module-CPANfile (master). "1.1002 bump"

[notifications]

From a22952610fb0c651b54251afc92ae9de1c695153 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:56:05 +0100
Subject: 1.1002 bump

---
 .gitignore| 1 +
 perl-Module-CPANfile.spec | 7 +--
 sources   | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e8487c8..3039dd4 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 /Module-CPANfile-1.0001.tar.gz
 /Module-CPANfile-1.1000.tar.gz
 /Module-CPANfile-1.1001.tar.gz
+/Module-CPANfile-1.1002.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Module-CPANfile.spec b/perl-Module-CPANfile.spec
index 7907022..09870de 100644
--- a/perl-Module-CPANfile.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-CPANfile.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Module-CPANfile
-Version:1.1001
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.1002
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Parse cpanfile
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 15 2016 Petr Pisar  - 1.1002-1
+- 1.1002 bump
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.1001-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 2adf85f..b411e07 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-dcee6be0ecfd5cd56bd58a41b2fda9ee  Module-CPANfile-1.1001.tar.gz
+a6b53848e44d13aac42b8bb6ea9f0d07  Module-CPANfile-1.1002.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Module-CPANfile.git/commit/?h=master=a22952610fb0c651b54251afc92ae9de1c695153
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar uploaded Module-CPANfile-1.1002.tar.gz for perl-Module-CPANfile

[notifications]

a6b53848e44d13aac42b8bb6ea9f0d07  Module-CPANfile-1.1002.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Module-CPANfile/Module-CPANfile-1.1002.tar.gz/md5/a6b53848e44d13aac42b8bb6ea9f0d07/Module-CPANfile-1.1002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: dnf remove qemu-img uninstall kernel

[Jan Zelený]

On 12. 2. 2016 at 18:42:50, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2016-02-12 at 19:36 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
> > Il 12/02/2016 19:22, Sérgio Basto ha scritto:
> > > On Sex, 2016-02-12 at 19:18 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
> > > > I've installed qemu to play with arm virtualization, now I want
> > > > to
> > > > uninstall it, but it seems that trying to uninstall anything qemu
> > > > related also removes all installed kernels Is this a DNF bug?
> > > 
> > > no this is :
> > > 
> > > clean_requirements_on_remove=true
> > > 
> > > in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
> > 
> > Thanks, setting it to "false" avoid kernel uninstalling.
> > 
> > But if it's not a bug, I can hardly see the reason to have a
> > "feature" 
> > that removes the kernel... dnf should not autoremove mandatory
> > system 
> > components. But that's my opinion, there's probably an important
> > reason 
> > for which I'm wrong.

This behavior might not be caused by a bug in dnf. There has recently been a 
bug in PackageKit which you might be hitting. It can also be that you reached 
limit of installonly packages. It's difficult to tell without deeper 
troubleshooting.

> You may mark kernel and others stuff that you don't want install and by
> default dnf have autoremove , I don't remember now the exact commands

I'm not sure I understand but I think the command you are looking for is dnf 
mark install. The packages you specify will be marked as "user installed" and 
dnf will no longer consider them for auto removal.

Thanks
Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1307197] perl-Module-CPANfile-1.1002 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307197

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|jples...@redhat.com,|ppi...@redhat.com
   |mmasl...@redhat.com |
   Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1307195] perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307195

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(p...@city-fan.org
   ||)



--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar  ---
Any reason why to run-require IPC::Run? IPC::Cmd uses IPC::Open3 on non-Windows
instead. See the BEGIN section in IPC::Cmd:

$USE_IPC_RUN= IS_WIN32 && !IS_WIN98;
$USE_IPC_OPEN3  = not IS_VMS;

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1307195] perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307195



--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar  ---
A bug fix release suitable for all Fedoras.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCC6: failure with -isystem /usr/include

[Orcan Ogetbil]

On 15 February 2016 at 01:46, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
> The new version of qjackctl, which now depends on qt5. We cannot do
> the update without fixing this. As far as I can tell, the qjackctl
> does not use the QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS directly. The offending flags
> come through qmake.
>

Here is a scratch SRPM which can be used for testing:
https://oget.fedorapeople.org/qjackctl/qjackctl-0.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm

Orcan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCC6: failure with -isystem /usr/include

[Orcan Ogetbil]

On 14 February 2016 at 18:42, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
>> The current (as of this email) qt5-qtbase is built with GCC6, but the
>> issue persists.
>> The builds seem fine with the above QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS line removed
>> manually. Should this issue be fixed in the qt5-qtbase package?
>
>
> what package is affected here?
>
> I have a suspicion that QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS is being misused in this
> context.

The new version of qjackctl, which now depends on qt5. We cannot do
the update without fixing this. As far as I can tell, the qjackctl
does not use the QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS directly. The offending flags
come through qmake.

Other than this the new qsynth also has the same issue when built with
autotools. Fortunately, qsynth provides an alternative cmake build
system which doesn't call qmake. We were able to build qsynth with
that one.

I don't know any other examples but I suspect any package using
qmake-qt5 could have this problem.

Orcan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305134] Review Request: perl-Data-Page-Pageset - Change long page list to be shorter and well navigate

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305134



--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius  ---
Thanks, Denis

Update:
spec: https://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Data-Page-Pageset.spec
srpm:
https://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Data-Page-Pageset-1.02-2.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] 2016-02-15 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 24 Blocker Review

[Adam Williamson]

# F24 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-02-15
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! We have a couple of proposed blockers for Final and a couple
of proposed freeze exceptions for Alpha, so let's take some time to
review them tomorrow morning.

If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting -  the full lists can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . Remember to check
each milestone (Alpha, Beta, Final).

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the 
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not 
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F24 can be found on the 
wiki [0].

For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, 
check out these links:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting 
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out 
the SOP on the wiki:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

Have a good night and see you tomorrow!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] 2016-02-15 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2016-02-15
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net

Greetings testers!

It's meeting time again tomorrow! We have some follow ups and I guess
some other topics? I know there are some but I don't remember what they
are. I just got off a plane, I can't think straight. Everyone suggest
your favourite topic!

== Proposed Agenda Topics ==

1. Previous meeting follow-up
2.+  find out tomorrow when Adam's brain works again
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fwd: Use suid_dumpable=2 for development releases

[Jakub Filak]

On 02/12/2016 07:57 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 07:24:06AM -0500, Jakub Filak wrote:

The default value 0 is there for good security reason, but I would
like to propose changing the default value to 2 for development
Fedora releases (Alpha, Beta, Rawhide). In this case, kernel would
send core dump to ABRT (or systemd-coredump) and the ABRT record
would be accessible only to root.

It seems like this would be unsafe if core_pattern is not a pipe or
fully qualified path.

   Ref: https://lwn.net/Articles/503682/

That's fine when ABRT is running, but would be unsafe if someone
disabled ABRT by directly setting core_pattern (eg. to "core.%p"), but
forgot about suid_dumpable.

The kernel does emit KERN_WARNING about this situation (upstream
commit 54b501992dd2), but it's not clear if a sysadmin would notice.

(I'm actually quite happy for the default to be changed as you
suggest, but can see it's a bit of a minefield.)

We could change the kernel to add suid_dumpable == 3 which is like
suid_dumpable==2 but only if the core_pattern is a pipe.


I didn't know that 3 is supported for suid_dumpable.
The value of 3 is not documented [1] and I can't find it in the source 
code [2].



Regards,
Jakub


1: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/proc.5.html
2: 
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/sched.h#n456

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fwd: Use suid_dumpable=2 for development releases

[Jakub Filak]

The issue described in the article was fixed by requiring an absolute
path in core_pattern (If I understand it correctly).

If core_pattern is unsafe, the process is not dumped at all  (man 5 proc).

The kernel commit adds a warning, because kernel was silently ignoring
crashes and no one could notice.


Regards,
Jakub

On 02/12/2016 07:32 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 07:24:06AM -0500, Jakub Filak wrote:

The default value 0 is there for good security reason, but I would
like to propose changing the default value to 2 for development
Fedora releases (Alpha, Beta, Rawhide). In this case, kernel would
send core dump to ABRT (or systemd-coredump) and the ABRT record
would be accessible only to root.

It seems like this would be unsafe if core_pattern is not a pipe or
fully qualified path.

   Ref: https://lwn.net/Articles/503682/

That's fine when ABRT is running, but would be unsafe if someone
disabled ABRT by directly setting core_pattern (eg. to "core.%p"), but
forgot about suid_dumpable.

The kernel does emit KERN_WARNING about this situation (upstream
commit 54b501992dd2), but it's not clear if a sysadmin would notice.

(I'm actually quite happy for the default to be changed as you
suggest, but can see it's a bit of a minefield.)

Rich.


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1308272] perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS: additional builds

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308272



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS-3.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-40aaea1f0d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1308272] perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS: additional builds

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308272



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS-3.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-582be1350c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Exception request: major version bump for Nginx

[Ken Dreyer]

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Jamie Nguyen  wrote:
> Sound reasonable?

As an EPEL nginx user, thanks for looking into this, and you have my
+1 for updating to a new secure version.

- Ken
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 343  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087   
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
 105  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-5aba523f53   
phpMyAdmin-4.4.15.4-1.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-a65d7ed780   
python-pymongo-2.5.2-4.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-638137e4de   
wordpress-4.4.2-1.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-c8f005b596   
mingw-curl-7.47.0-1.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-a140bf655b   
mingw-libpng-1.6.21-1.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6a9bb3d488   
mingw-libxml2-2.9.3-1.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6d2a530b12   
mingw-pcre-8.38-1.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-2d8fa2e036   
firebird-2.5.5.26952.0-2.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-23f4cb12a2   
php-horde-horde-5.2.9-1.el7
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-50304d1e1f   
nodejs-0.10.42-4.el7
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-bc557a5441   
nghttp2-1.7.1-1.el7
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-287d763bcd   
GraphicsMagick-1.3.23-4.el7 gdl-0.9.5-3.el7 octave-3.8.2-19.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

GraphicsMagick-1.3.23-4.el7
MUMPS-5.0.1-12.el7
ciphertest-0.2.2-1.el7
dnsdist-1.0.0-0.6.alpha2.el7
dvdisaster-0.79.5-1.el7
elk-3.3.17-17.el7
freight-0.3.5-10.el7
gdal-1.11.4-1.el7
gdl-0.9.5-3.el7
gpaw-0.11.0.13004-21.el7
hgsubversion-1.8.5-1.el7
letsencrypt-0.4.0-1.el7
mingw-opus-1.1.2-2.el7
nghttp2-1.7.1-1.el7
octave-3.8.2-19.el7
openprops-0.7.1-1.el7
osbs-client-0.17-1.el7
perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS-3.1-3.el7
php-horde-kronolith-4.2.14-1.el7
php-pecl-event-1.11.3-1.el7
php-phpunit-PHPUnit-4.8.23-1.el7
python-acme-0.4.0-1.el7
python-pika-0.10.0-3.el7
quantum-espresso-5.3.0-7.el7
quassel-0.12.3-1.el7
sipp-3.5.0-2.el7
xrootd-4.2.3-5.el7

Details about builds:



 GraphicsMagick-1.3.23-4.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-287d763bcd)
 An ImageMagick fork, offering faster image generation and better quality

Update Information:

Security fix for CVE-2015-8808

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1305505 - CVE-2015-8808 GraphicsMagick: out-of-bound read in the 
parsing of GIF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305505




 MUMPS-5.0.1-12.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-dc7ff09ff6)
 A MUltifrontal Massively Parallel sparse direct Solver

Update Information:

- Added linker flags to fix unused-direct-shlib-dependency




 ciphertest-0.2.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-8aa7206d68)
 An SSL cipher checker

Update Information:

Update to latest upstream version 0.2.2




 dnsdist-1.0.0-0.6.alpha2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e4cb3c6363)
 Highly DNS-, DoS- and abuse-aware loadbalancer

Update Information:

First preview release of dnsdist for EPEL 7




 dvdisaster-0.79.5-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-622c9196b6)
 Additional error protection for CD/DVD media

Update Information:

Update to 0.79.5




 elk-3.3.17-17.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-a60799cd6a)
 FP-LAPW Code

Update Information:

Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild

[Bug 1308272] perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS: additional builds

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308272



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS-3.1-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b409a676ed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1308272] perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS: additional builds

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308272

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS-3.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-c57b34286a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 239  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828   
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
 221  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031   
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
 215  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168   
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
 147  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8148   
optipng-0.7.5-5.el6
 147  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8156   
nagios-4.0.8-1.el6
 105  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
  77  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-35e240edd9   
thttpd-2.25b-24.el6
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-579c4e2951   
prosody-0.9.10-1.el6
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6eee18cd6e   
phpMyAdmin-4.0.10.14-1.el6
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-eb496fe204   
python-pymongo-2.5.2-3.el6.1
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-cd56c646d5   
wordpress-4.4.2-1.el6
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-cb3b95bd2f   
firebird-2.5.5.26952.0-2.el6
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-8aee7a9340   
php-horde-horde-5.2.9-1.el6
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-f61ec30f9f   
poco-1.4.2p1-3.el6
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-791080c274   
nodejs-0.10.42-4.el6
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-eb24bfea0d   
octave-3.4.3-2.el6 gdl-0.9.5-4.el6 GraphicsMagick-1.3.23-4.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

GraphicsMagick-1.3.23-4.el6
MUMPS-5.0.1-12.el6
exim-4.72-8.el6
freight-0.3.5-7.el6
gdl-0.9.5-4.el6
octave-3.4.3-2.el6
osbs-client-0.17-1.el6
perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS-3.1-3.el6
php-horde-kronolith-4.2.14-1.el6
xrootd-4.2.3-5.el6

Details about builds:



 GraphicsMagick-1.3.23-4.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-eb24bfea0d)
 An ImageMagick fork, offering faster image generation and better quality

Update Information:

Security fix for CVE-2015-8808

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1305505 - CVE-2015-8808 GraphicsMagick: out-of-bound read in the 
parsing of GIF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305505




 MUMPS-5.0.1-12.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-79dda7684e)
 A MUltifrontal Massively Parallel sparse direct Solver

Update Information:

- Added linker flags to fix unused-direct-shlib-dependency




 exim-4.72-8.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-8e8ac9dfda)
 The exim mail transfer agent

Update Information:

This is an update backporting openssl_options which can be used for e.g.
disablement of SSLv3.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1274822 - Why there is  still exim 4.72 in epel 6?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274822




 freight-0.3.5-7.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e6d7b375ed)
 A modern take on the Debian archive

Update Information:

- Fix compatibility with apt 1.1 (Debian Stretch, Ubuntu Xenial)




 gdl-0.9.5-4.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-eb24bfea0d)
 GNU Data Language

Update Information:

Security fix for CVE-2015-8808

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1305505 - CVE-2015-8808 GraphicsMagick: out-of-bound read in the 
parsing of GIF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305505




 octave-3.4.3-2.el6 

[Bug 1305249] perl-Devel-Timer-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305249

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-Timer-0.07-1.fc2 |perl-Devel-Timer-0.07-1.fc2
   |3   |3
   ||perl-Devel-Timer-0.07-1.fc2
   ||2



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1304558] perl-Log-Report-1.13 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304558

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.13-1.fc24 |perl-Log-Report-1.13-1.fc24
   |perl-Log-Report-1.13-1.fc23 |perl-Log-Report-1.13-1.fc23
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.13-1.fc22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1304558] perl-Log-Report-1.13 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304558



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-Report-1.13-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305249] perl-Devel-Timer-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305249



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Devel-Timer-0.07-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305188] perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305188

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55-1. |perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55-1.
   |fc23|fc23
   ||perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55-1.
   ||fc22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305188] perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305188



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1304558] perl-Log-Report-1.13 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304558

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.13-1.fc24 |perl-Log-Report-1.13-1.fc24
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.13-1.fc23
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-02-14 21:53:15



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1304558] perl-Log-Report-1.13 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304558



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-Report-1.13-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305188] perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305188



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305249] perl-Devel-Timer-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305249



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Devel-Timer-0.07-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305188] perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305188

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55-1.
   ||fc23
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-02-14 21:52:13



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305249] perl-Devel-Timer-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305249

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-Timer-0.07-1.fc2
   ||3
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-02-14 21:52:17



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305714] perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.43 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305714



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.43-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1301214] perl-Email-Valid: please update in epel7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301214



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Email-Valid-1.198-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1301214] perl-Email-Valid: please update in epel7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301214

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Email-Valid-1.198-1.el
   ||7
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-02-14 19:56:44



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

[Martin Kolman]

- Original Message -
> From: "Josh Boyer" 
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" 
> 
> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 10:29:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without 
> coordinating with them first
> 
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Till Maas  wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > On Sa, Feb 13, 2016 at 09:43:06 -0800, Alex Gagniuc wrote:
> >
> >> I was in the process of upgrading to the latest upstream releases,
> >> which came out about a week ago. You've interrupted the process by
> >> pushing some unrelated changes, and now I have to figure out what
> >
> > the changes were not unrelated but fixed the build error for pulseview
> > on Rawhide and extending the build overrides fixed the build errors on
> > F23 (which you can also read in the changelog).
> >
> >> You've done that without  any attempt at contacting me. There are
> >
> > This is not true, since I tried to contact you via IRC.
> 
> I'm not going to weigh in on the changes, but I did want to address
> this in public so others can learn.
> 
> IRC alone is not sufficient.  We cannot expect volunteer maintainers
> to be on IRC all the time.  In the future, please email and wait at
> least a bit for a reply.
I think some automated tooling for this would be very beneficial - basically 
something
like a GitHub/GitLab pull request for the distgit repo, that fires an email 
notification once submitted.

There could be two types of pull requests - one "normal" that needs to be 
accepted by the maintainer
and one "timed" that proven-packagers can submit that self-applies after say 48 
hours.

The main advantage would be that you can just "fire away" without having to ask 
for permission and the system
takes care for the rest - by notifying the maintainer and giving him the chance 
to review the changes before
they are applied (and to possibly apply them differently, etc.).
> 
> josh
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Self Introduction: John M. Harris, Jr.

[John M. Harris, Jr.]

I'm a developer, currently working on a project called OpenBlox. To
that end, I have packaged a library used by both my project and a
project which is already packaged in Fedora. You may find that review
request at the link below:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308367
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCC6: failure with -isystem /usr/include

[Rex Dieter]

Orcan Ogetbil wrote:

> The current (as of this email) qt5-qtbase is built with GCC6, but the
> issue persists.
> The builds seem fine with the above QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS line removed
> manually. Should this issue be fixed in the qt5-qtbase package?


what package is affected here?

I have a suspicion that QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS is being misused in this 
context.

-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - lnovich ooprala and vjancik

[Pete Travis]

On Feb 14, 2016 2:07 PM, "Kevin Fenzi"  wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:59:18 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 10:06:58PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:34:28PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > > > for these package maintainers are no longer valid.  I'm starting
> > > > the unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
> > > > interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them
> > > > update their email addresses in FAS).  If they're not interested
> > > > in maintaining or we can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the
> > > > packages so that others can take them over.
> > > >
> > > > If you have a way to contact these maintainers, please let them
> > > > know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > lnovich:
> > > >
> > > > default_assignee
> > > >  - virtualization-administration-guide (Fedora Documentation)
> > > >  - virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide (Fedora
> > > >Documentation)
> > >
> > > I forwarded this message to Laura's new address.  Will follow up if
> > > I get a response.
> >
> > Laura says she has no time to work on Fedora packaging.  The packages
> > can be orphaned.  I'll see if I can get our new documentation manager
> > to pick them up.
>
> ok. Note that these are docs, not packages... I can ask Fedora Docs
> folks too if there's someone else who might want to own them.
>
> kevin

I've changed the default assignee for Laura's components over to the Docs
list, the group will take responsibility for now.

--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - lnovich ooprala and vjancik

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:59:18 +
"Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 10:06:58PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:34:28PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:  
> > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > > for these package maintainers are no longer valid.  I'm starting
> > > the unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
> > > interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them
> > > update their email addresses in FAS).  If they're not interested
> > > in maintaining or we can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the
> > > packages so that others can take them over.
> > > 
> > > If you have a way to contact these maintainers, please let them
> > > know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
> > > Thanks!
> > > 
> > > lnovich:
> > > 
> > > default_assignee
> > >  - virtualization-administration-guide (Fedora Documentation)
> > >  - virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide (Fedora
> > >Documentation)  
> > 
> > I forwarded this message to Laura's new address.  Will follow up if
> > I get a response.  
> 
> Laura says she has no time to work on Fedora packaging.  The packages
> can be orphaned.  I'll see if I can get our new documentation manager
> to pick them up.

ok. Note that these are docs, not packages... I can ask Fedora Docs
folks too if there's someone else who might want to own them. 

kevin




pgpkaclkPthE0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Are branches permanent in Fedora SCM?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:58:31 -0500
Randy Barlow  wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> I've been working on a big change to a package's spec file, so I
> wanted to do my work in a branch separate of master or f23. Now that
> I am done with my branch, it seems that I cannot delete the branch
> 
> $ git push origin :rbarlow-16.01
> remote: FATAL: + refs/heads/rbarlow-16.01 rpms/ejabberd rbarlow DENIED
> by fallthru
> remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/rbarlow-16.01
> 
> Is there a way for me to remove this branch, or is it going to be
> there permanently?

Currently there's not a way to remove it. 

We need to get it to where we can say for sure no official build ever
happened from that branch before we remove it. I think the plan was to
restrict builds to only "normal" branches, but I don't think thats yet
in place. 

kevin


pgpaGwLBR5Wmm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1308365] New: slic3r crashes when loading known good stl files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308365

Bug ID: 1308365
   Summary: slic3r crashes when loading known good stl files
   Product: Fedora
   Version: 23
 Component: slic3r
  Assignee: mhron...@redhat.com
  Reporter: johnduc...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: mhron...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Created attachment 1127097
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1127097=edit
This is an stl file that slic3r is having trouble with. It is an sd card holder

Description of problem:
slic3r loads a known good stl file, announces that it is too large and was
automatically scaled down to fit your print bed, on saying 'ok' slic3r closes
completely.
The file is 'known good' as it loads into the slic3r in Fedora 22 with no
problem (not too large)

I ran from terminal with these results:

[jduchek@localhost ~]$ slic3r
Warning: File size doesn't match number of facets in the header
Caught C++ exception of unknown type at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Slic3r/GUI/Plater.pm line 1791.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.2.9-3.fc23

How reproducible:
always on the files it decides are too large.  Some files still load properly.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Run slic3r
2.add affected file (stl)
3.say ok, when it tells you it has fixed the file.

Actual results:  slic3r closes so you have to start over


Expected results: display the loaded file.


Additional info: I have attached an affected stl file

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

[Till Maas]

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:50:34PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 05:40:07PM -0800, Alex Gagniuc wrote:

> > yes, I have an IRC bouncer server, so I was able to find your question
> > after some grepping. It was posted before dawn in my timezone, so I
> > wouldn't have had a chance to respond anyhow.
> 
> Since I assumed that you would like it if pulseview was fixed and the
> update complete.

Sorry, I forgot half the sentence here:
Since I assumed that you would like it if pulseview was fixed and the
update complete I just wanted to make sure that you are not working on
it right now to avoid any conflicting commits. Therefore if you were not
available on IRC I assumed you were also not working on it at that time.

Kind regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Are branches permanent in Fedora SCM?

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 01:09:33PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:58:31 -0500
> Randy Barlow  wrote:
> 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > I've been working on a big change to a package's spec file, so I
> > wanted to do my work in a branch separate of master or f23. Now that
> > I am done with my branch, it seems that I cannot delete the branch
> > 
> > $ git push origin :rbarlow-16.01
> > remote: FATAL: + refs/heads/rbarlow-16.01 rpms/ejabberd rbarlow DENIED
> > by fallthru
> > remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/rbarlow-16.01
> > 
> > Is there a way for me to remove this branch, or is it going to be
> > there permanently?
> 
> Currently there's not a way to remove it. 
> 
> We need to get it to where we can say for sure no official build ever
> happened from that branch before we remove it. I think the plan was to
> restrict builds to only "normal" branches, but I don't think thats yet
> in place. 
Maybe it would be possible to allow removals of branches whose
tip commit it rechable from another branch? IIUC, you don't need
the actual branch, just the commit from which something was built.

Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

corsepiu pushed to perl-Params-Validate (f22). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild"

[notifications]

From 8b58093889e9252f52424a7abc2c44dbd981e848 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:18:25 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild

---
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 5 -
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index 64bbd77..e172092 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 Summary:   Params-Validate Perl module
 Name:  perl-Params-Validate
 Version:   1.21
-Release:   2%{?dist}
+Release:   3%{?dist}
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Validate/
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.21-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 22 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-2
 - Modernise spec.
 
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Validate.git/commit/?h=f22=8b58093889e9252f52424a7abc2c44dbd981e848
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

corsepiu pushed to perl-Params-Validate (f22). "Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f23' into f22"

[notifications]

From bd211f29aa6a32e38f1c6d17109410924871541a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= 
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:58:10 +0100
Subject: Modernise spec.

---
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 7 ---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index 94d20da..64bbd77 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 Summary:   Params-Validate Perl module
 Name:  perl-Params-Validate
 Version:   1.21
-Release:   1%{?dist}
+Release:   2%{?dist}
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Validate/
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ BuildRequires:  aspell-en
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Portability::Files)
 %endif
 
-%{?perl_default_filter}
-
 %description
 The Params::Validate module allows you to validate method or function
 call parameters to an arbitrary level of specificity. At the simplest
@@ -101,6 +99,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jan 22 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-2
+- Modernise spec.
+
 * Sun Jul 26 2015 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-1
 - Upstream update.
 - Reflect Attribute::Params::Validate having been dropped from
-- 
cgit v0.11.2


From 8b58093889e9252f52424a7abc2c44dbd981e848 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:18:25 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild

---
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 5 -
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index 64bbd77..e172092 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 Summary:   Params-Validate Perl module
 Name:  perl-Params-Validate
 Version:   1.21
-Release:   2%{?dist}
+Release:   3%{?dist}
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Validate/
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.21-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 22 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-2
 - Modernise spec.
 
-- 
cgit v0.11.2


From 66fd938610ecc12b750b42b88ad7c1a5f004060e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= 
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:48:38 +0100
Subject: Upstream update.

- Reflect changes to BRs.
---
 .gitignore|  2 +-
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 11 +--
 sources   |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 908043e..dc68f3c 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/Params-Validate-1.21.tar.gz
+/Params-Validate-1.22.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index e172092..29708e4 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
 
 Summary:   Params-Validate Perl module
 Name:  perl-Params-Validate
-Version:   1.21
-Release:   3%{?dist}
+Version:   1.22
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Validate/
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(base)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Devel::Peek)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Temp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(JSON::PP) >= 2.27300
 BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Fatal)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.96
@@ -61,6 +62,8 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::LinkCheck)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::No404s)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::Spelling)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Synopsis)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::CPAN::Meta::JSON) >= 0.16
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Mojibake)
 BuildRequires:  aspell-en
 # Optional:
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Portability::Files)
@@ -99,6 +102,10 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 14 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.22-1
+- Upstream update.
+- Reflect changes to BRs.
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.21-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 7829b51..0dc465d 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c81e5d44cbda5aeb8a3be03b35dc410b  Params-Validate-1.21.tar.gz
+f97cfb4669cdfaa10f85c4e200ffdd35  Params-Validate-1.22.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2


From 

corsepiu pushed to perl-Params-Validate (f22). "Modernise spec."

[notifications]

From bd211f29aa6a32e38f1c6d17109410924871541a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= 
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:58:10 +0100
Subject: Modernise spec.

---
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 7 ---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index 94d20da..64bbd77 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 Summary:   Params-Validate Perl module
 Name:  perl-Params-Validate
 Version:   1.21
-Release:   1%{?dist}
+Release:   2%{?dist}
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Validate/
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ BuildRequires:  aspell-en
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Portability::Files)
 %endif
 
-%{?perl_default_filter}
-
 %description
 The Params::Validate module allows you to validate method or function
 call parameters to an arbitrary level of specificity. At the simplest
@@ -101,6 +99,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jan 22 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-2
+- Modernise spec.
+
 * Sun Jul 26 2015 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-1
 - Upstream update.
 - Reflect Attribute::Params::Validate having been dropped from
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Validate.git/commit/?h=f22=bd211f29aa6a32e38f1c6d17109410924871541a
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

corsepiu pushed to perl-Params-Validate (f22). "Upstream update. (..more)"

[notifications]

From 66fd938610ecc12b750b42b88ad7c1a5f004060e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= 
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:48:38 +0100
Subject: Upstream update.

- Reflect changes to BRs.
---
 .gitignore|  2 +-
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 11 +--
 sources   |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 908043e..dc68f3c 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/Params-Validate-1.21.tar.gz
+/Params-Validate-1.22.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index e172092..29708e4 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
 
 Summary:   Params-Validate Perl module
 Name:  perl-Params-Validate
-Version:   1.21
-Release:   3%{?dist}
+Version:   1.22
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Validate/
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(base)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Devel::Peek)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Temp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(JSON::PP) >= 2.27300
 BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Fatal)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.96
@@ -61,6 +62,8 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::LinkCheck)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::No404s)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::Spelling)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Synopsis)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::CPAN::Meta::JSON) >= 0.16
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Mojibake)
 BuildRequires:  aspell-en
 # Optional:
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Portability::Files)
@@ -99,6 +102,10 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 14 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.22-1
+- Upstream update.
+- Reflect changes to BRs.
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.21-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 7829b51..0dc465d 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c81e5d44cbda5aeb8a3be03b35dc410b  Params-Validate-1.21.tar.gz
+f97cfb4669cdfaa10f85c4e200ffdd35  Params-Validate-1.22.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Validate.git/commit/?h=f22=66fd938610ecc12b750b42b88ad7c1a5f004060e
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

corsepiu pushed to perl-Params-Validate (f22). "Cleanup merger."

[notifications]

From 4bbc86f8d5ee88643ee27540d421879662f69e0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= 
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:08:53 +0100
Subject: Cleanup merger.

---
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index 29708e4..1624a87 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -106,9 +106,6 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 - Upstream update.
 - Reflect changes to BRs.
 
-* Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.21-3
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
-
 * Fri Jan 22 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-2
 - Modernise spec.
 
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Validate.git/commit/?h=f22=4bbc86f8d5ee88643ee27540d421879662f69e0c
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

[Till Maas]

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 04:29:38PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

> I'm not going to weigh in on the changes, but I did want to address
> this in public so others can learn.

IMHO the kind of changes are important here. The situation was that
there were was an incomplete update to the sigrok packages in Rawhide
and Fedora 23 testing for about a week. This means that any Rawhide user
wanting to use pulseview (the GUI tool for sigrok) could not install it
freshly or would get broken dependency warnings when trying to update
Rawhide. The same goes for F23 testing. Also the necessary buildroot
overrides required for F23 were expired, requiring them to be extended
to be able to build pulseview and also sigrok-cli, which just failed in
F23 because of missing dependencies from the buildroot overrides.
But pulseview also did not compile because of errors already fixed by
upstream.

So the main change I did was adding unmodified upstream patches to
pulseview getting it to compile. While doing this I noticed that
pulseview was not using the %license macro yet, so I fixed this as well.

> IRC alone is not sufficient.  We cannot expect volunteer maintainers
> to be on IRC all the time.  In the future, please email and wait at
> least a bit for a reply.

Given the changes that I described, do you still state that this (fixing
incomplete updates/dependencies/package building) is something that
provenpackagers should first get permission to do by the package
maintainer? I mainly cared about not doing the same work twice and
making sure that I do not commit something conflicting to the GIT as the
same time the maintainer might commit something, which is why I found
IRC sufficient at that time. Also IMHO it is beneficial to the Fedora
project to fix breakage in the repositories as soon as possible. And as
a package maintainer myself I would be thankful for every other package
maintainer fixing bugs in my packages while I sleep. Since I am a
volunteer maintainer myself, the strict requirement to get permission
via e-mail to fix sigrok in this situation would have meant that I would
have done nothing. Yesterday I had time and motivation to look into it
and fix it. But if I asked "May I please fix your package?", it is very
likely that I would not have the time or motivation to actually do it
once I get the response.

Kind regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide 20160214 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Cloud disk raw i386
Minimal disk raw armhfp
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Kde live x86_64

Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160213:

Design_suite live x86_64
Generic boot x86_64
Lxde live i386
Soas disk raw armhfp
Xfce disk raw armhfp
Cloud vagrant virtualbox x86_64
Xfce live i386
Lxde live x86_64
Design_suite live i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Games live x86_64
Robotics live i386
Workstation live i386
Games live i386
Cloud_atomic disk qcow x86_64
Workstation disk raw armhfp
Generic boot i386
Security live x86_64
Cloud vagrant libvirt x86_64
Cinnamon live i386
Xfce live x86_64
Soas live i386
Cinnamon live x86_64
Mate live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Cloud docker x86_64
Robotics live x86_64
Soas live x86_64
Mate disk raw armhfp
Mate live i386
Security live i386

No images in Rawhide 20160213 but not this.

Failed openQA tests: 18 of 63

ID: 5317Test: x86_64 workstation_live default_install@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5317
ID: 5316Test: x86_64 workstation_live default_install
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5316
ID: 5315Test: i386 generic_boot default_install
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5315
ID: 5321Test: i386 workstation_live default_install
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5321
ID: 5304Test: i386 universal server_repository_http_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5304
ID: 5305Test: i386 universal server_scsi_updates_img
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5305
ID: 5303Test: i386 universal package_set_minimal
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5303
ID: 5306Test: i386 universal server_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5306
ID: 5307Test: i386 universal server_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5307
ID: 5292Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5292
ID: 5299Test: i386 universal server_lvmthin
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5299
ID: 5308Test: i386 universal server_btrfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5308
ID: 5309Test: i386 universal server_ext3
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5309
ID: 5302Test: i386 universal package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5302
ID: 5300Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5300
ID: 5294Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5294
ID: 5301Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5301
ID: 5279Test: x86_64 universal package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/5279

Passed openQA tests: 42 of 63
3 openQA tests may be still running or broken!
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

[Till Maas]

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 05:40:07PM -0800, Alex Gagniuc wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Till Maas 
> wrote:

> # Zero-day patches after 0.3.0 release. Extract using:
> # $ git clone git://sigrok.org/pulseview.git
> # $ cd pulseview
> # $ git checkout a1a3656b4e18cb9fc078a51bf4256066ee307620
> # $ git format-patch pulseview-0.3.0

These instructions are great. Btw. I was told on IRC that there might be
a bugfix sigrok release soonish that includes these fixes.

> yes, I have an IRC bouncer server, so I was able to find your question
> after some grepping. It was posted before dawn in my timezone, so I
> wouldn't have had a chance to respond anyhow.

Since I assumed that you would like it if pulseview was fixed and the
update complete.

> > Also pushing
> > dependent builds in separate updates is against best practices as this
> > will lead to broken updates.
> 
> I haven't been able to stay up-to date with the latest and greatest
> guidelines in the past several years due to jobs, military training,
> etc, though I'm always looking for hints on how to improve the process
> of pushing out these updates.

Probably everyone has not enough time to keep up with everything. I am
sure that some of my packages are also still using %doc instead of
%license, since I update this when I need to update the package anyhow -
and sometimes someone else is kind enough to do it.  However, I guess I
was not clear enough about the updates bundling. You should publish all
related builds in one update, i.e. add the sigrok-cli build to the big
other update. This ensures that all builds are pushed together and
avoids that only some of the builds are updated on a system breaking the
other tools.

Kind Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1308342] perl-Mojolicious-6.46 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308342



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12981090

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rawhide report: 20160214 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

Compose started at Sun Feb 14 05:15:03 UTC 2016
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libOpenMeshCore.so.3.2
[alliance]
alliance-5.0-40.20090901snap.fc22.i686 requires libXm.so.2
[asterisk]
asterisk-alembic-13.7.2-2.fc24.i686 requires alembic
[bluetile]
bluetile-0.6-30.fc24.i686 requires 
ghc(gtk-0.13.9-617097e8e58bbdfcb14229157446fd13)
bluetile-0.6-30.fc24.i686 requires 
ghc(gio-0.13.1.0-be3d2018727671c3e3e37abf8b7e522d)
[bustle]
bustle-0.4.8-6.fc24.i686 requires 
ghc(gtk-0.13.9-617097e8e58bbdfcb14229157446fd13)
bustle-0.4.8-6.fc24.i686 requires 
ghc(gio-0.13.1.0-be3d2018727671c3e3e37abf8b7e522d)
[castxml]
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMXCoreInfo.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMXCoreDisassembler.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMXCoreDesc.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMXCoreCodeGen.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMXCoreAsmPrinter.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMX86Info.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMX86Disassembler.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMX86Desc.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMX86CodeGen.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMX86AsmPrinter.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMX86AsmParser.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSystemZInfo.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSystemZDisassembler.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSystemZDesc.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSystemZCodeGen.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSystemZAsmPrinter.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSystemZAsmParser.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSupport.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSparcInfo.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSparcDisassembler.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSparcDesc.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSparcCodeGen.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSparcAsmPrinter.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMSparcAsmParser.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMPowerPCInfo.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMPowerPCDisassembler.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMPowerPCDesc.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMPowerPCCodeGen.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMPowerPCAsmPrinter.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMPowerPCAsmParser.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMOption.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMNVPTXInfo.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMNVPTXDesc.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMNVPTXCodeGen.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMNVPTXAsmPrinter.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMMipsInfo.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMMipsDisassembler.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMMipsDesc.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMMipsCodeGen.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMMipsAsmPrinter.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMMipsAsmParser.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMMSP430Info.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMMSP430Desc.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMMSP430CodeGen.so.3.7
castxml-0.1-0.9.20160125gitfc71eb9.fc24.i686 requires 
libLLVMMSP430AsmPrinter.so.3.7

[Bug 1308342] perl-Mojolicious-6.46 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308342



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1127035
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1127035=edit
[patch] Update to 6.46 (#1308342)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1303926] gtk3-3.19.8-2.fc24 breaks introspection ABI at gdk_rgba_parse()

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303926

Mamoru TASAKA  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1308030



--- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA  ---
rubygem-gdk3 test suite is also broken due to this.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308030
[Bug 1308030] rubygem-gdk3: FTBFS in rawhide
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1308342] New: perl-Mojolicious-6.46 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308342

Bug ID: 1308342
   Summary: perl-Mojolicious-6.46 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Mojolicious
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
robinlee.s...@gmail.com



Latest upstream release: 6.46
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.45-3.fc24
URL: http://mojolicio.us/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCC 6: template argument deduction/substitution failed

[Tom Hughes]

On 14/02/16 11:59, Michael Schwendt wrote:


Is there any helpful list of major changes in GCC 6, which may give a hint
about what C++ gotchas that used to build with GCC 5 may not be valid anymore?


https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/porting_to.html is the main thing I think.


And is there a bugzilla tracker ticket for other packages with C++ compilation
issues?


Well the mass rebuild FTBFS tracker ticket is probably the closest thing 
to that?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305208

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCC 6: template argument deduction/substitution failed

[Florian Weimer]

On 02/14/2016 12:59 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Is there any helpful list of major changes in GCC 6, which may give a hint
> about what C++ gotchas that used to build with GCC 5 may not be valid anymore?

I think this case might be a missing #include .

> jack-ng.cc:259:42: error: no matching function for call to 'end(jack_port_t* 
> [10])'
>  std::fill (m_ports, std::end (m_ports), nullptr);
>   ^

If the compiler can't find a function, it's useful to check where it is
declared, and that happens to be  (according to
cppreference.com, I didn't check the standard).

Florian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCC 6: template argument deduction/substitution failed

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:21:23 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:

> I think this case might be a missing #include .

Indeed.  was not enough anymore.

Thank you, Florian!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20160212 compose check report

[Adam Williamson]

On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 10:04 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 21:25:56 +0100,
>   Adam Williamson  wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 19:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> > >  
> > > Failed openQA tests: 16 of 63
> > 
> > 32-bit tests are still failing to boot, still kernel issue there.
> 
> I suspect the real issue is with binutils rather than the kernel.

OK, sure - point is, whatever that bug is, it's still the same one :)
(AFAICT).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Rawhide 20160214 nightly compose nominated for testing

[adamwill]

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 24 Rawhide 20160214. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Notable package version changes:
lorax - 20160210: 24.9-2, 20160214: 24.10-1
anaconda - 20160210: 24.11-1, 20160214: 24.12-1

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/24

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20160214_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20160214_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20160214_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20160214_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20160214_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20160214_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20160214_Security_Lab
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20160214_Download

Thank you for testing!
-- 
Mail generated by relval: https://www.happyassassin.net/wikitcms/
On behalf of: adamwill
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

liborigin FTBFS

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hello,

Yesterday I was notified that liborigin failed to build in rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307729

For the past couple of days I've been away on a work trip and I won't
be back until the end of next week. Unless this failure messes someone
else's packages, would it be OK to ignore the error until then?

Best regards
Alex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Are branches permanent in Fedora SCM?

[Randy Barlow]

Hello!

I've been working on a big change to a package's spec file, so I wanted
to do my work in a branch separate of master or f23. Now that I am done
with my branch, it seems that I cannot delete the branch

$ git push origin :rbarlow-16.01
remote: FATAL: + refs/heads/rbarlow-16.01 rpms/ejabberd rbarlow DENIED
by fallthru
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/rbarlow-16.01

Is there a way for me to remove this branch, or is it going to be there
permanently?

-- 
Randy Barlow
xmpp: bowlofe...@electronsweatshop.com
irc:  bowlofeggs on Freenode



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20160212 compose check report

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 21:25:56 +0100,
 Adam Williamson  wrote:

On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 19:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:

 
Failed openQA tests: 16 of 63


32-bit tests are still failing to boot, still kernel issue there.


I suspect the real issue is with binutils rather than the kernel.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

corsepiu pushed to perl-Params-Validate (f23). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild"

[notifications]

From 8b58093889e9252f52424a7abc2c44dbd981e848 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:18:25 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild

---
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 5 -
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index 64bbd77..e172092 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 Summary:   Params-Validate Perl module
 Name:  perl-Params-Validate
 Version:   1.21
-Release:   2%{?dist}
+Release:   3%{?dist}
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Validate/
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.21-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 22 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-2
 - Modernise spec.
 
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Validate.git/commit/?h=f23=8b58093889e9252f52424a7abc2c44dbd981e848
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

corsepiu pushed to perl-Params-Validate (f23). "Modernise spec."

[notifications]

From bd211f29aa6a32e38f1c6d17109410924871541a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= 
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:58:10 +0100
Subject: Modernise spec.

---
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 7 ---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index 94d20da..64bbd77 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 Summary:   Params-Validate Perl module
 Name:  perl-Params-Validate
 Version:   1.21
-Release:   1%{?dist}
+Release:   2%{?dist}
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Validate/
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ BuildRequires:  aspell-en
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Portability::Files)
 %endif
 
-%{?perl_default_filter}
-
 %description
 The Params::Validate module allows you to validate method or function
 call parameters to an arbitrary level of specificity. At the simplest
@@ -101,6 +99,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jan 22 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-2
+- Modernise spec.
+
 * Sun Jul 26 2015 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-1
 - Upstream update.
 - Reflect Attribute::Params::Validate having been dropped from
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Validate.git/commit/?h=f23=bd211f29aa6a32e38f1c6d17109410924871541a
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

corsepiu pushed to perl-Params-Validate (f23). "Upstream update. (..more)"

[notifications]

From 66fd938610ecc12b750b42b88ad7c1a5f004060e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= 
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:48:38 +0100
Subject: Upstream update.

- Reflect changes to BRs.
---
 .gitignore|  2 +-
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 11 +--
 sources   |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 908043e..dc68f3c 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/Params-Validate-1.21.tar.gz
+/Params-Validate-1.22.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index e172092..29708e4 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
 
 Summary:   Params-Validate Perl module
 Name:  perl-Params-Validate
-Version:   1.21
-Release:   3%{?dist}
+Version:   1.22
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Validate/
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(base)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Devel::Peek)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Temp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(JSON::PP) >= 2.27300
 BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Fatal)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.96
@@ -61,6 +62,8 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::LinkCheck)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::No404s)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::Spelling)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Synopsis)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::CPAN::Meta::JSON) >= 0.16
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Mojibake)
 BuildRequires:  aspell-en
 # Optional:
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Portability::Files)
@@ -99,6 +102,10 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 14 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.22-1
+- Upstream update.
+- Reflect changes to BRs.
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.21-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 7829b51..0dc465d 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-c81e5d44cbda5aeb8a3be03b35dc410b  Params-Validate-1.21.tar.gz
+f97cfb4669cdfaa10f85c4e200ffdd35  Params-Validate-1.22.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Validate.git/commit/?h=f23=66fd938610ecc12b750b42b88ad7c1a5f004060e
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

corsepiu pushed to perl-Params-Validate (f23). "Cleanup merger."

[notifications]

From 4bbc86f8d5ee88643ee27540d421879662f69e0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= 
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:08:53 +0100
Subject: Cleanup merger.

---
 perl-Params-Validate.spec | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
index 29708e4..1624a87 100644
--- a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-Validate.spec
@@ -106,9 +106,6 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2>/dev/null ';'
 - Upstream update.
 - Reflect changes to BRs.
 
-* Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.21-3
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
-
 * Fri Jan 22 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.21-2
 - Modernise spec.
 
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Validate.git/commit/?h=f23=4bbc86f8d5ee88643ee27540d421879662f69e0c
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Is my package a special Conflict: snowflake?

[Igor Gnatenko]

I would ask Peter. CCed.

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016, 12:55 AM Randy Barlow 
wrote:

> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > You don't state the actual conflict anywhere in this mail, so my
> > reply is based on my guess what the problem is.
>
> Hello Zbyszek, thank you for your input!
>
> To clarify, rebar (the Erlang build tool) wants to find the package
> "xmlrpc" in %{_erllibdir}/xmlrpc-*/, and what it finds inside must also
> follow this name. Frankly, I'm pretty new at Erlang, so this is just
> based on my anecdotal evidence of playing with it for several weeks.
>
> So the issue is that my xmlrpc and the one that's already in Fedora both
> "want" to be in that same folder.
>
> I could attempt to rename the package, but this would mean adjusting all
> references to its name internally, as well as references to its name
> externally in ejabberd. I'm not sure how much effort this would be, but
> doing it with sed might not be the best choice because I wouldn't want
> to assume that any use of the string "xmlrpc" should be replaced.
>
> > Let me add another reason for avoiding Conflicts that has become more
> > prominent over time: upgrades.
>
> This is a compelling point that I had not considered. Users from F22 or
> 23 who have ejabberd and the other package will hit a conflict on
> upgrading. I agree that is bad.
>
> > Also under the new bundling guidelines [1] you can bundle the other
> > version. Since the plan is to move to a different dependency soon
> > anyway, this is imho tottally reasonable in this case.
>
> This is a good point too. I think I will invest a little time in seeing
> if I can figure out how to do this today.
>
> Thanks so much for your input. I'm a new Fedora packager and I'm also
> new at Erlang, so I appreciate your perspective!
>
> --
> Randy Barlow
> xmpp: bowlofe...@electronsweatshop.com
> irc:  bowlofeggs on Freenode
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
-- 

-Igor Gnatenko
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

GCC 6: template argument deduction/substitution failed

[Michael Schwendt]

Is there any helpful list of major changes in GCC 6, which may give a hint
about what C++ gotchas that used to build with GCC 5 may not be valid anymore?

And is there a bugzilla tracker ticket for other packages with C++ compilation
issues?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1307334

if g++ -fPIC -DPIC -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security 
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong 
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches 
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -std=c++0x 
-std=gnu++11 -ffast-math -Wall -pipe -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wtype-limits 
-Woverloaded-virtual -fvisibility=hidden -include config.h   -I../.. -c -o 
jack-ng.plugin.o jack-ng.cc; then \
printf "Successfully compiled jack-ng.cc (plugin).\n"; \
else \
err=$?; printf "Failed to compile jack-ng.cc (plugin)!\n"; exit $err; \
fi
jack-ng.cc: In member function 'virtual void JACKOutput::close_audio()':
jack-ng.cc:259:42: error: no matching function for call to 'end(jack_port_t* 
[10])'
 std::fill (m_ports, std::end (m_ports), nullptr);
  ^
In file included from /usr/include/libaudcore/audstrings.h:26:0,
 from jack-ng.cc:22:
/usr/include/c++/6.0.0/initializer_list:99:5: note: candidate: template constexpr const _Tp* std::end(std::initializer_list<_Tp>)
 end(initializer_list<_Tp> __ils) noexcept
 ^~~
/usr/include/c++/6.0.0/initializer_list:99:5: note:   template argument 
deduction/substitution failed:
jack-ng.cc:259:42: note:   mismatched types 'std::initializer_list<_Tp>' and 
'jack_port_t** {aka _jack_port**}'
 std::fill (m_ports, std::end (m_ports), nullptr);
  ^
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Is my package a special Conflict: snowflake?

[Florian Weimer]

On 02/14/2016 12:54 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> You don't state the actual conflict anywhere in this mail, so my
>> reply is based on my guess what the problem is.
> 
> Hello Zbyszek, thank you for your input!
> 
> To clarify, rebar (the Erlang build tool) wants to find the package
> "xmlrpc" in %{_erllibdir}/xmlrpc-*/, and what it finds inside must also
> follow this name. Frankly, I'm pretty new at Erlang, so this is just
> based on my anecdotal evidence of playing with it for several weeks.
> 
> So the issue is that my xmlrpc and the one that's already in Fedora both
> "want" to be in that same folder.

What we do with other languages is to patch the sources of the
application to use the library under the name as it is provided by
Fedora (or perhaps bundle the library with the application, under the
new rules).

I'm not sure how common it is these days, but there used to be
considerable variance of the include paths under /usr/include, for example.

Florian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - lnovich ooprala and vjancik

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 10:06:58PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:34:28PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for these package maintainers are no longer valid.  I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> > in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
> > addresses in FAS).  If they're not interested in maintaining or we
> > can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others
> > can take them over.
> > 
> > If you have a way to contact these maintainers, please let them
> > know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > lnovich:
> > 
> > default_assignee
> >  - virtualization-administration-guide (Fedora Documentation)
> >  - virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide (Fedora
> >Documentation)
> 
> I forwarded this message to Laura's new address.  Will follow up if I
> get a response.

Laura says she has no time to work on Fedora packaging.  The packages
can be orphaned.  I'll see if I can get our new documentation manager
to pick them up.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org