Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I also wonder what happened to rubygem-slop [1], because it says it is > retired, while it should be only orphaned [2]. > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-slop Looks like some debugging slipped it way to the release and introduced a bug, thanks for catching this, it has been fixed. Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
There is very likely more packages like this: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-tern-cordovajs Vít Dne 05. 05. 20 v 8:53 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > I also wonder what happened to rubygem-slop [1], because it says it is > retired, while it should be only orphaned [2]. > > > Vít > > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-slop > > [2] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AI57XN2SQVXMT7QQBGSZECYVJP4H3LOK/ > > > Dne 04. 05. 20 v 17:13 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): >> Good Morning Everyone, >> >> You may remember the email below from a little while ago. >> >> Well, we just wanted to let you know that this is now running in production >> and >> the data present in the fedora-scm-requests repo has been migrated and that >> git >> repo has been cleared of a large number of files. >> >> Let us know if you run into any problems or have any questions with this. >> >> >> Happy packaging! >> >> Pierre >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >>> Good Morning Everyone, >>> >>> A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to >>> stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. >>> >>> However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides >>> (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point >>> of >>> contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). >>> >>> Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on >>> pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository >>> at >>> fedora-scm-request[2]. >>> >>> This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate >>> if >>> you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your >>> liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ >>> >>> The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the >>> staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of >>> the >>> overrides in production as of yesterday. >>> >>> Here is an example with an override: >>> https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/0ad >>> >>> >>> One note: in the rpms namespace, the UI will always show you the default >>> assignee for Fedora and Fedora EPEL, regardless of whether the package is in >>> EPEL. >>> This is a shortcoming we are aware of and will be looking at fixing in the >>> near >>> future but potentially after it has reached production. >>> >>> >>> Thank you for your understanding and help testing this, >>> Pierre >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UWVJBV3RBVCW2IW5Z47QJTBO5T5KDGNJ/ >>> [2] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests >>> [3] https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/ >> ___ >> devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
I also wonder what happened to rubygem-slop [1], because it says it is retired, while it should be only orphaned [2]. Vít [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-slop [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AI57XN2SQVXMT7QQBGSZECYVJP4H3LOK/ Dne 04. 05. 20 v 17:13 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > Good Morning Everyone, > > You may remember the email below from a little while ago. > > Well, we just wanted to let you know that this is now running in production > and > the data present in the fedora-scm-requests repo has been migrated and that > git > repo has been cleared of a large number of files. > > Let us know if you run into any problems or have any questions with this. > > > Happy packaging! > > Pierre > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> Good Morning Everyone, >> >> A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to >> stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. >> >> However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides >> (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point of >> contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). >> >> Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on >> pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository >> at >> fedora-scm-request[2]. >> >> This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate >> if >> you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your >> liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ >> >> The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the >> staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of the >> overrides in production as of yesterday. >> >> Here is an example with an override: >> https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/0ad >> >> >> One note: in the rpms namespace, the UI will always show you the default >> assignee for Fedora and Fedora EPEL, regardless of whether the package is in >> EPEL. >> This is a shortcoming we are aware of and will be looking at fixing in the >> near >> future but potentially after it has reached production. >> >> >> Thank you for your understanding and help testing this, >> Pierre >> >> >> [1] >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UWVJBV3RBVCW2IW5Z47QJTBO5T5KDGNJ/ >> [2] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests >> [3] https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/ > ___ > devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 07:02:35PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > It seems that only the main admin can edit the owners (they have > displayed the "edit" button), is that expected? E.g. checking > rubygem-puma [1], where I have admin bit, I cannot edit the BZ assignee, > while for rubygem-tilt [2] as a main admin, I can. Miro has asked for cvsadmin to be able to edit the bugzilla overrides and the simplest solution to this request was to allow all project admins to change them. I have a patch (already merged) that I'm thinking to apply on the current release to make this available sooner. Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On 04. 05. 20 19:08, Vít Ondruch wrote: And since I am asking questions like this, how does it work for group owned packages (if there are any, can't find any example ATM, but there used to be, right?)? There aren't any. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
And since I am asking questions like this, how does it work for group owned packages (if there are any, can't find any example ATM, but there used to be, right?)? Vít Dne 04. 05. 20 v 19:02 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > It seems that only the main admin can edit the owners (they have > displayed the "edit" button), is that expected? E.g. checking > rubygem-puma [1], where I have admin bit, I cannot edit the BZ assignee, > while for rubygem-tilt [2] as a main admin, I can. > > > Vít > > > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-puma/ > > [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-tilt > > > Dne 04. 05. 20 v 17:13 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): >> Good Morning Everyone, >> >> You may remember the email below from a little while ago. >> >> Well, we just wanted to let you know that this is now running in production >> and >> the data present in the fedora-scm-requests repo has been migrated and that >> git >> repo has been cleared of a large number of files. >> >> Let us know if you run into any problems or have any questions with this. >> >> >> Happy packaging! >> >> Pierre >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >>> Good Morning Everyone, >>> >>> A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to >>> stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. >>> >>> However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides >>> (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point >>> of >>> contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). >>> >>> Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on >>> pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository >>> at >>> fedora-scm-request[2]. >>> >>> This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate >>> if >>> you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your >>> liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ >>> >>> The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the >>> staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of >>> the >>> overrides in production as of yesterday. >>> >>> Here is an example with an override: >>> https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/0ad >>> >>> >>> One note: in the rpms namespace, the UI will always show you the default >>> assignee for Fedora and Fedora EPEL, regardless of whether the package is in >>> EPEL. >>> This is a shortcoming we are aware of and will be looking at fixing in the >>> near >>> future but potentially after it has reached production. >>> >>> >>> Thank you for your understanding and help testing this, >>> Pierre >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UWVJBV3RBVCW2IW5Z47QJTBO5T5KDGNJ/ >>> [2] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests >>> [3] https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/ >> ___ >> devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
It seems that only the main admin can edit the owners (they have displayed the "edit" button), is that expected? E.g. checking rubygem-puma [1], where I have admin bit, I cannot edit the BZ assignee, while for rubygem-tilt [2] as a main admin, I can. Vít [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-puma/ [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-tilt Dne 04. 05. 20 v 17:13 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > Good Morning Everyone, > > You may remember the email below from a little while ago. > > Well, we just wanted to let you know that this is now running in production > and > the data present in the fedora-scm-requests repo has been migrated and that > git > repo has been cleared of a large number of files. > > Let us know if you run into any problems or have any questions with this. > > > Happy packaging! > > Pierre > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> Good Morning Everyone, >> >> A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to >> stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. >> >> However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides >> (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point of >> contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). >> >> Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on >> pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository >> at >> fedora-scm-request[2]. >> >> This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate >> if >> you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your >> liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ >> >> The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the >> staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of the >> overrides in production as of yesterday. >> >> Here is an example with an override: >> https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/0ad >> >> >> One note: in the rpms namespace, the UI will always show you the default >> assignee for Fedora and Fedora EPEL, regardless of whether the package is in >> EPEL. >> This is a shortcoming we are aware of and will be looking at fixing in the >> near >> future but potentially after it has reached production. >> >> >> Thank you for your understanding and help testing this, >> Pierre >> >> >> [1] >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UWVJBV3RBVCW2IW5Z47QJTBO5T5KDGNJ/ >> [2] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests >> [3] https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/ > ___ > devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
Good Morning Everyone, You may remember the email below from a little while ago. Well, we just wanted to let you know that this is now running in production and the data present in the fedora-scm-requests repo has been migrated and that git repo has been cleared of a large number of files. Let us know if you run into any problems or have any questions with this. Happy packaging! Pierre On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to > stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. > > However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides > (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point of > contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on > pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository at > fedora-scm-request[2]. > > This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate if > you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your > liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ > > The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the > staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of the > overrides in production as of yesterday. > > Here is an example with an override: > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/0ad > > > One note: in the rpms namespace, the UI will always show you the default > assignee for Fedora and Fedora EPEL, regardless of whether the package is in > EPEL. > This is a shortcoming we are aware of and will be looking at fixing in the > near > future but potentially after it has reached production. > > > Thank you for your understanding and help testing this, > Pierre > > > [1] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UWVJBV3RBVCW2IW5Z47QJTBO5T5KDGNJ/ > [2] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests > [3] https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/ ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
Good Morning Everyone, You may remember the email below from a little while ago. Well, we just wanted to let you know that this is now running in production and the data present in the fedora-scm-requests repo has been migrated and that git repo has been cleared of a large number of files. Let us know if you run into any problems or have any questions with this. Happy packaging! Pierre On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to > stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. > > However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides > (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point of > contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on > pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository at > fedora-scm-request[2]. > > This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate if > you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your > liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ > > The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the > staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of the > overrides in production as of yesterday. > > Here is an example with an override: > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/0ad > > > One note: in the rpms namespace, the UI will always show you the default > assignee for Fedora and Fedora EPEL, regardless of whether the package is in > EPEL. > This is a shortcoming we are aware of and will be looking at fixing in the > near > future but potentially after it has reached production. > > > Thank you for your understanding and help testing this, > Pierre > > > [1] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UWVJBV3RBVCW2IW5Z47QJTBO5T5KDGNJ/ > [2] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests > [3] https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/ ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:56:01AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 03. 20 14:45, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > If you are logged in and on a package where you have admin rights, > > > > there should > > > > be an "update" button underneath, clicking it makes a pop-up (a modal) > > > > appear, > > > > in which you can update the settings. > > > It appears you need to be main admin to do this. Is that intended? > > Reading the code it is definitely intended: > > https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/blob/master/f/pagure_distgit/plugin.py#_417 > > but I guess we could relax this to all project admins. > > May I suggest that members of the cvsadmin group should be able to change > this as well? > > I can change the main admin but not the bugizlla assignee which is kinda > weird. > > I am able to get the thing done by making myself the main admin, doing it > and giving the package back to the original owner, but it feels silly and > overcomplicated. That is a good point > Should I file a ticket at https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/ ? Please yes :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On 17. 03. 20 14:45, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: If you are logged in and on a package where you have admin rights, there should be an "update" button underneath, clicking it makes a pop-up (a modal) appear, in which you can update the settings. It appears you need to be main admin to do this. Is that intended? Reading the code it is definitely intended: https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/blob/master/f/pagure_distgit/plugin.py#_417 but I guess we could relax this to all project admins. May I suggest that members of the cvsadmin group should be able to change this as well? I can change the main admin but not the bugizlla assignee which is kinda weird. I am able to get the thing done by making myself the main admin, doing it and giving the package back to the original owner, but it feels silly and overcomplicated. Should I file a ticket at https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/ ? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:26:18PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 03. 20 14:14, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 17. 03. 20 11:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality > > > > on > > > > pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git > > > > repository at > > > > fedora-scm-request[2]. > > > > > > Thank You both \o/ > > > > > > > This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much > > > > appreciate if > > > > you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your > > > > liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ > > > > > > 1. Can you make the usernames clickable please? > > > > That should be doable, to http://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/user/ I > > guess? > > I guess so. Plus extra care for groups. > > > > 2. I don't understand how to update the information, I can only understand > > > how to read it. > > > > If you are logged in and on a package where you have admin rights, there > > should > > be an "update" button underneath, clicking it makes a pop-up (a modal) > > appear, > > in which you can update the settings. > > It appears you need to be main admin to do this. Is that intended? > > The fields seem to have no validation: > > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pip This has been addressed and the new code deployed in staging. If there are no other issues found/reported, I would like to look at pushing this to production next week. Thanks for your feedback! Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
Dne 17. 03. 20 v 14:24 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:25:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 17. 03. 20 v 11:58 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): >>> Good Morning Everyone, >>> >>> A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to >>> stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. >>> >>> However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides >>> (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point >>> of >>> contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). >>> >>> Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on >>> pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository >>> at >>> fedora-scm-request[2]. >> >> Am I supposed to be able to modify the owners? > Yes and your comment as well as Miro's makes me wonder if something isn't > working as it should. The "Update" together with the icon is probably not intuitive. I thought that the button will refresh the fields or something. Also, the UX differs from the "monitoring status", where there is popup. > >>> This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate >>> if >>> you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your >>> liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ >>> >>> The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the >>> staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of >>> the >>> overrides in production as of yesterday. >>> >>> Here is an example with an override: >>> https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/0ad >>> >>> One note: in the rpms namespace, the UI will always show you the default >>> assignee for Fedora and Fedora EPEL, regardless of whether the package is in >>> EPEL. >> >> Packages coming from RHEL are the same I assume. I just asking, because >> there is difference in not being in EPEL and being in EPEL transitively >> from RHEL. > I am not quite following you here, what I meant is that the UI always displays > Fedora and EPEL for the rpms namespace, even, for example, for the kernel > which > is definitely not in EPEL. > I am not sure I'm clearer, so I must be missing something here, sorry. If package might be in EPEL, but it is not, because nobody have imported it seems to be different case then Kernel, which can't be in EPEL. These two should be distinguished. Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:26:18PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 03. 20 14:14, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 17. 03. 20 11:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality > > > > on > > > > pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git > > > > repository at > > > > fedora-scm-request[2]. > > > > > > Thank You both \o/ > > > > > > > This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much > > > > appreciate if > > > > you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your > > > > liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ > > > > > > 1. Can you make the usernames clickable please? > > > > That should be doable, to http://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/user/ I > > guess? > > I guess so. Plus extra care for groups. > > > > 2. I don't understand how to update the information, I can only understand > > > how to read it. > > > > If you are logged in and on a package where you have admin rights, there > > should > > be an "update" button underneath, clicking it makes a pop-up (a modal) > > appear, > > in which you can update the settings. > > It appears you need to be main admin to do this. Is that intended? Reading the code it is definitely intended: https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/blob/master/f/pagure_distgit/plugin.py#_417 but I guess we could relax this to all project admins. > The fields seem to have no validation: > > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pip That is indeed correct for the moment. Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:14:46PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > If you are logged in and on a package where you have admin rights, there > should > be an "update" button underneath, clicking it makes a pop-up (a modal) appear, > in which you can update the settings. > > > > The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to > > > the > > > staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of > > > the > > > overrides in production as of yesterday. > > > > When the data does not reflect the state of the fedora-scm-requests repo, > > should we report it as a bug? Example: > > > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/blob/master/f/rpms/python-tox > > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tox > > Reporting here should be enough, I'll check this. Ok, so pebkac on this one. I kept doing a git pull that was showing my git repo as up to date, except that it was pulling from my fork... Pulling from the right (upstream) repo did bring the override info for python-tox and the script is re-running right now. Sorry for the inconvenience, Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:17:13PM +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to > > stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. > > > > However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides > > (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point > > of > > contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). > > > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on > > pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository > > at > > fedora-scm-request[2]. > > > > This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate > > if > > you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your > > liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ > > > > The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the > > staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of > > the > > overrides in production as of yesterday. > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/setroubleshoot - main admin - > plaut...@redhat.com > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814223 - Assignee Petr Lautrbach > > but > > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/setroubleshoot - > > Bugzilla Assignee: > Fedora: > dwalsh > EPEL: > dwalsh This is because the main maintainer of the package in staging is still dwalsh and there is no overrides that I can see in fedora-scm-requests. In production, you can see the main admin is plautrba, so once we move this to production, plautrba will show as default assignee for both Fedora and EPEL. Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On 17. 03. 20 14:14, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 17. 03. 20 11:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository at fedora-scm-request[2]. Thank You both \o/ This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate if you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ 1. Can you make the usernames clickable please? That should be doable, to http://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/user/ I guess? I guess so. Plus extra care for groups. 2. I don't understand how to update the information, I can only understand how to read it. If you are logged in and on a package where you have admin rights, there should be an "update" button underneath, clicking it makes a pop-up (a modal) appear, in which you can update the settings. It appears you need to be main admin to do this. Is that intended? The fields seem to have no validation: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pip The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of the overrides in production as of yesterday. When the data does not reflect the state of the fedora-scm-requests repo, should we report it as a bug? Example: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/blob/master/f/rpms/python-tox https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tox Reporting here should be enough, I'll check this. OK. Thanks. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:25:03PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 17. 03. 20 v 11:58 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to > > stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. > > > > However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides > > (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point > > of > > contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). > > > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on > > pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository > > at > > fedora-scm-request[2]. > > > Am I supposed to be able to modify the owners? Yes and your comment as well as Miro's makes me wonder if something isn't working as it should. > > This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate > > if > > you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your > > liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ > > > > The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the > > staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of > > the > > overrides in production as of yesterday. > > > > Here is an example with an override: > > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/0ad > > > > One note: in the rpms namespace, the UI will always show you the default > > assignee for Fedora and Fedora EPEL, regardless of whether the package is in > > EPEL. > > Packages coming from RHEL are the same I assume. I just asking, because > there is difference in not being in EPEL and being in EPEL transitively > from RHEL. I am not quite following you here, what I meant is that the UI always displays Fedora and EPEL for the rpms namespace, even, for example, for the kernel which is definitely not in EPEL. I am not sure I'm clearer, so I must be missing something here, sorry. Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 03. 20 11:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on > > pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository > > at > > fedora-scm-request[2]. > > Thank You both \o/ > > > This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate > > if > > you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your > > liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ > > 1. Can you make the usernames clickable please? That should be doable, to http://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/user/ I guess? > 2. I don't understand how to update the information, I can only understand > how to read it. If you are logged in and on a package where you have admin rights, there should be an "update" button underneath, clicking it makes a pop-up (a modal) appear, in which you can update the settings. > > The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the > > staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of > > the > > overrides in production as of yesterday. > > When the data does not reflect the state of the fedora-scm-requests repo, > should we report it as a bug? Example: > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/blob/master/f/rpms/python-tox > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tox Reporting here should be enough, I'll check this. Thanks! :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
Dne 17. 03. 20 v 11:58 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > Good Morning Everyone, > > A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to > stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. > > However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides > (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point of > contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on > pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository at > fedora-scm-request[2]. Am I supposed to be able to modify the owners? > > This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate if > you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your > liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ > > The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the > staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of the > overrides in production as of yesterday. > > Here is an example with an override: > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/0ad > > > One note: in the rpms namespace, the UI will always show you the default > assignee for Fedora and Fedora EPEL, regardless of whether the package is in > EPEL. Packages coming from RHEL are the same I assume. I just asking, because there is difference in not being in EPEL and being in EPEL transitively from RHEL. Vít > This is a shortcoming we are aware of and will be looking at fixing in the > near > future but potentially after it has reached production. > > > Thank you for your understanding and help testing this, > Pierre > > > [1] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UWVJBV3RBVCW2IW5Z47QJTBO5T5KDGNJ/ > [2] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests > [3] https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On 17. 03. 20 11:58, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository at fedora-scm-request[2]. Thank You both \o/ This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate if you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ 1. Can you make the usernames clickable please? 2. I don't understand how to update the information, I can only understand how to read it. The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of the overrides in production as of yesterday. When the data does not reflect the state of the fedora-scm-requests repo, should we report it as a bug? Example: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/blob/master/f/rpms/python-tox https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tox -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > A little while ago[1], we integrated anitya in dist-git itself, allowing to > stop using fedora-scm-request's[2] git repository to store this information. > > However, this git repository is still being used to store bugzilla overrides > (i.e.: default assignee on bugzilla ticket when they differ from the point of > contact (main admin) of the package in dist-git). > > Together with Karsten Hopp we worked on integrating this functionality on > pagure-dist-git[3], thus allowing to get rid entirely of the git repository at > fedora-scm-request[2]. > > This work has been deployed in staging today. We would very much appreciate if > you could take a few minute of your time and see if it works to your > liking: https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/ > > The overrides information from production has been migrated yesterday to the > staging dist-git, so what you see in the UI reflects the current state of the > overrides in production as of yesterday. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/setroubleshoot - main admin - plaut...@redhat.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814223 - Assignee Petr Lautrbach but https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/setroubleshoot - Bugzilla Assignee: Fedora: dwalsh EPEL: dwalsh signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
