Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
Hi Sri, We have submitted a new version addressing all the comments we received: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-04 Thanks! Carlos On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 8:51 PM CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO wrote: > Hi Sri, > > We'll do. Thanks! > > Carlos > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) < > sgund...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for all the feedback. >> >> Authors: Please post a revised document, addressing all the comments that >> you have received. >> >> Sri >> >> From: dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli < >> sgund...@cisco.com> >> Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM >> To: "dmm@ietf.org" >> Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 >> >> Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC >> on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. >> >> *We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from >> Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the >> authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not >> sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep >> this on experimental track.* >> >> The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of >> reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and >> there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the >> document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the >> working group. >> >> >> The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. >> >> Document Link: >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt >> <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03...txt> >> >> The target status for this document is “Experimental”. >> >> Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. >> >> >> Thanks! >> Dapeng & Sri >> >> >> ___ >> dmm mailing list >> dmm@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> > ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
Hi Sri, We'll do. Thanks! Carlos On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) < sgund...@cisco.com> wrote: > Thanks for all the feedback. > > Authors: Please post a revised document, addressing all the comments that > you have received. > > Sri > > From: dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli < > sgund...@cisco.com> > Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM > To: "dmm@ietf.org" > Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 > > Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC > on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. > > *We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from > Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the > authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not > sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep > this on experimental track.* > > The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of > reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and > there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the > document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the > working group. > > > The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. > > Document Link: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt > <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03...txt> > > The target status for this document is “Experimental”. > > Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. > > > Thanks! > Dapeng & Sri > > > ___ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
Thanks a lot John! We'll address your comments in the next revision. Carlos On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 6:11 PM John Kaippallimalil < john.kaippallima...@huawei.com> wrote: > Review and comments on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03. > > > > The text in the draft is clear, and it is ready to move forward in my view. > > > > A couple of comments below: > > (not repeating nits that Dirk has already posted) > > > > Section 3: > > “As another note, the solution described in this document allows > performing per-prefix anchoring decisions, to support e.g., some flows to > be anchored at a central Home-DPA (like a traditional LMA)” > > Would be good to clarify a bit here: is this a result of the MN requesting > central anchoring (or not), or the result of the mobility topology (MAARs, > CMDs). > > > > Section 3.4: > > Does the implementation with parallel operations need to mention something > about race conditions. > It is probably fine in practice, but not a completely safe operation > (e.g., MAAR2 may forward data to MAAR1 before the route update at MAAR1 is > complete) > > Overall – the draft looks really good and ready. > > > > John > > > > > > > > *From:* dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of * > dirk.von-h...@telekom.de > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 16, 2019 10:18 AM > *To:* sgund...@cisco.com > *Cc:* dmm@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 > > > > Hi all, > > I agree to forward the mature and very useful document to IESG. > > > > I just detected 3 very minor nits presumably created during recent > re-formatting: > > P.7 > > the MN-ID, Pref1 and MAAr1's address as a Proxy-CoA => the MN-ID, Pref1, > and MAAR1's address as a Proxy-CoA > > > > 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) an unicast a Router Advertisement > (RA) to the MN with Pref1 => 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) and > unicasts a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN with Pref1 > > P.9 > > Step 6. Is an empty one and SHOULD be deleted > > ;-) > > > > Thanks! > > Kind regards > > Dirk > > > > *From:* dmm *On Behalf Of *Sri Gundavelli > (sgundave) > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019 19:44 > *To:* dmm@ietf.org > *Subject:* [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 > > > > Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC > on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. > > > > *We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from > Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the > authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not > sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep > this on experimental track.* > > > > The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of > reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and > there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the > document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the > working group. > > > > > > The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. > > > > Document Link: > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt > <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt> > > > > The target status for this document is “Experimental”. > > > > Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. > > > > > > Thanks! > > Dapeng & Sri > > > > > ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
Review and comments on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03. The text in the draft is clear, and it is ready to move forward in my view. A couple of comments below: (not repeating nits that Dirk has already posted) Section 3: "As another note, the solution described in this document allows performing per-prefix anchoring decisions, to support e.g., some flows to be anchored at a central Home-DPA (like a traditional LMA)" Would be good to clarify a bit here: is this a result of the MN requesting central anchoring (or not), or the result of the mobility topology (MAARs, CMDs). Section 3.4: Does the implementation with parallel operations need to mention something about race conditions. It is probably fine in practice, but not a completely safe operation (e.g., MAAR2 may forward data to MAAR1 before the route update at MAAR1 is complete) Overall - the draft looks really good and ready. John From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of dirk.von-h...@telekom.de Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 10:18 AM To: sgund...@cisco.com Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 Hi all, I agree to forward the mature and very useful document to IESG. I just detected 3 very minor nits presumably created during recent re-formatting: P.7 the MN-ID, Pref1 and MAAr1's address as a Proxy-CoA => the MN-ID, Pref1, and MAAR1's address as a Proxy-CoA 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) an unicast a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN with Pref1 => 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) and unicasts a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN with Pref1 P.9 Step 6. Is an empty one and SHOULD be deleted ;-) Thanks! Kind regards Dirk From: dmm mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019 19:44 To: dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep this on experimental track. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working group. The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. Document Link: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://www.ietf..org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt> The target status for this document is "Experimental". Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. Thanks! Dapeng & Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
Hi all, I support the WGLC for this draft, as well. Best regards Luis On 2019-01-09 19:43, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: > Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. > > WE HAVE ALSO MADE ONE KEY CHANGE TO THE DOCUMENT STATUS, MOVING IT FROM > STANDARDS TRACK TO EXPERIMENTAL TRACK. WE THE CHAIRS HAVE TALKED TO THE > AUTHORS AND THEY ARE OK WITH THIS CHANGE. WE ARE DONG THIS AS WE ARE NOT SURE > ABOUT ANY POTENTIAL VENDOR IMPLEMENTATIONS AND SO WE CHOSE TO KEEP THIS ON > EXPERIMENTAL TRACK. > > The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of > reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and > there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the > document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the > working group. > > The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. > > Document Link: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt [1] > > The target status for this document is "Experimental". > > Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. > > Thanks! > Dapeng & Sri > > ___ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm -- ___ Luis M. Contreras i...@lmcontreras.com luismiguel.contrerasmuri...@telefonica.com Links: -- [1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
Hi Dirk, Thanks a lot. We'll address your comments once the WGLC is finished. Carlos On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:17 PM wrote: > Hi all, > > I agree to forward the mature and very useful document to IESG. > > > > I just detected 3 very minor nits presumably created during recent > re-formatting: > > P.7 > > the MN-ID, Pref1 and MAAr1's address as a Proxy-CoA => the MN-ID, Pref1, > and MAAR1's address as a Proxy-CoA > > > > 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) an unicast a Router Advertisement > (RA) to the MN with Pref1 => 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) and > unicasts a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN with Pref1 > > P.9 > > Step 6. Is an empty one and SHOULD be deleted > > ;-) > > > > Thanks! > > Kind regards > > Dirk > > > > *From:* dmm *On Behalf Of *Sri Gundavelli > (sgundave) > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019 19:44 > *To:* dmm@ietf.org > *Subject:* [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 > > > > Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC > on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. > > > > *We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from > Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the > authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not > sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep > this on experimental track.* > > > > The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of > reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and > there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the > document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the > working group. > > > > > > The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. > > > > Document Link: > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt > <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt> > > > > The target status for this document is “Experimental”. > > > > Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. > > > > > > Thanks! > > Dapeng & Sri > > > > > ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
Hi all, I agree to forward the mature and very useful document to IESG. I just detected 3 very minor nits presumably created during recent re-formatting: P.7 the MN-ID, Pref1 and MAAr1's address as a Proxy-CoA => the MN-ID, Pref1, and MAAR1's address as a Proxy-CoA 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) an unicast a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN with Pref1 => 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) and unicasts a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN with Pref1 P.9 Step 6. Is an empty one and SHOULD be deleted ;-) Thanks! Kind regards Dirk From: dmm On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019 19:44 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep this on experimental track. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working group. The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. Document Link: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://www.ietf..org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt> The target status for this document is "Experimental". Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. Thanks! Dapeng & Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
I support progressing this version of the document on the experimental track. marco From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019 19:44 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep this on experimental track. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working group. The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. Document Link: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://www.ietf..org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt> The target status for this document is "Experimental". Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. Thanks! Dapeng & Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
+1 I support WGLC for this draft. Experimental track seems to be a good choice as well for this draft. Cheers, Pablo. From: dmm on behalf of Akbar Rahman Date: Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 15:34 To: "dmm@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 +1 I support progressing this document. As mentioned by Sri, this document has good through several reviews already, and I think it is in good shape . Best Regards, Akbar From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Moses, Danny Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:33 AM To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 Hi, I support WGLC for this draft. Danny From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:43 PM Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 To: dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> mailto:dmm@ietf.org>> Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital.com%7C60274eeab4b34a7c71ff08d67add3f2c%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831488005258628=GoGZrluqjX6gEPkzX3iWJW9mosQw56UHQZJlNEdml%2BE%3D=0>. We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep this on experimental track. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working group. The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. Document Link: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://na01.safelinks..protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital.com%7C60274eeab4b34a7c71ff08d67add3f2c%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831488005258628=CDUxNnfJvMooSN2666U4mpJmmRT6G54XxU78XgsmKag%3D=0> The target status for this document is “Experimental”. Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. Thanks! Dapeng & Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdmm=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital.com%7C60274eeab4b34a7c71ff08d67add3f2c%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831488005258628=W7lx74PGJ2u09iyEuJ7lB%2FoBAS4uN9IqpDQgOeU5PZ8%3D=0> - A member of the Intel Corporation group of companies This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
+1 I support progressing this document. As mentioned by Sri, this document has good through several reviews already, and I think it is in good shape .. Best Regards, Akbar From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Moses, Danny Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:33 AM To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 Hi, I support WGLC for this draft. Danny From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:43 PM Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 To: dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> mailto:dmm@ietf.org>> Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital..com%7C60274eeab4b34a7c71ff08d67add3f2c%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831488005258628=GoGZrluqjX6gEPkzX3iWJW9mosQw56UHQZJlNEdml%2BE%3D=0>. We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep this on experimental track. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working group. The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. Document Link: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital..com%7C60274eeab4b34a7c71ff08d67add3f2c%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831488005258628=CDUxNnfJvMooSN2666U4mpJmmRT6G54XxU78XgsmKag%3D=0> The target status for this document is "Experimental". Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. Thanks! Dapeng & Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm<https://na01.safelinks.protection..outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdmm=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital.com%7C60274eeab4b34a7c71ff08d67add3f2c%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831488005258628=W7lx74PGJ2u09iyEuJ7lB%2FoBAS4uN9IqpDQgOeU5PZ8%3D=0> - A member of the Intel Corporation group of companies This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
Hi, I support WGLC for this draft. Danny From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:43 PM Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 To: dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> mailto:dmm@ietf.org>> Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep this on experimental track. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working group. The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. Document Link: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt> The target status for this document is “Experimental”. Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. Thanks! Dapeng & Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm - A member of the Intel Corporation group of companies This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
[DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep this on experimental track. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working group. The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. Document Link: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt The target status for this document is "Experimental". Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. Thanks! Dapeng & Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
