[Elecraft] K3 - Removing screws with split lock washers - care...

2009-02-21 Thread Stewart Rolfe
When loosening screws that have split lock washers underneath, the washer
often turns with the screw initially and scores (or worse) the
underlying copper earthing ring; earthing could be affected but also
there may be copper 'filings' floating around the rest of the board.


I've just replaced the DSP board on K3 #145 due to a minor
fault which only came to light after fitting the KRX3 (scratchy audio
for 10 -15 minutes after switch on while the front panel warms up and
which disappears when the aux dsp is removed - presumably a faulty aux
dsp I/O on the main dsp board); I found I'd slightly damaged the
mounting holes while removing the 3 metal pillars that support the aux
dsp pcb.


If I was doing this for another reason which meant
re-installing the main dsp board it would be much better in this
particular instance to hold the screw still with a cross-head
screwdriver and loosen by undoing the pillar on the other side with a
nut driver; that way the washer should stay still and not scrape the
copper ring.


Incidentally, dealing with Elecraft support was easy,
efficient and totally painless. If only the rest of life was this
good..

Apologies to anyone who has read this before when I originally posted this 
message via Nabble; for some reason Nabble didn't want to forward it here.


73,


Stewart Rolfe, GW0ETF


(Hoping to be C56/GW0ETF with the rejuvenated K3 late Feb/early March...)



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 phones - separate left/right volume adjustment?

2009-02-21 Thread Karsten Beyer
Hello, this is Karsten, DL1QC,

I´m slightly handicaped in hearing on left ear, so I hear CW with K3  
always a litte bit out of the middle. Is there an option or procedure to  
adjust the level of the stereo phones left/right separately?
vy 73 es tnx for all
de Karsten - DL1QC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Elecraft] PC Color Codes

2009-02-21 Thread David Robertson
Mike,

The universal color codes that PC's use on their cound card plugs are:
Red=Mic in
Green=Line out
Blue=Line in

This is assuming your sound card is set up for analog sound out and not 6 
channel digital.

On some sound cards there are additional plugs for rear speakers and digital 
output which you dont use for amateur radio connunications.

Old sound cards use lables (which are hard to read) and are all the same color 
plugs.

73
Dave KD1NA

Dave Wrote...but did apply all of the applicable hardware mods to date. So
hopefully the distortion is not hardware related but operator error in
driving my soundcard too hard.

Dave,
When I have my K3 Line Out plugged into my sound card rear microphone input
I see IMD products that I don't see when I plug into the Line In on the PC
soundcard. It is difficult for me to know which one I am plugged into
because I do not understand the color code on the PC sound input output
panel. The only way I make sure I am plugged into Line In is to bring up the
Windows microphone panel and mute all inputs but Line In and make sure that
I am getting a waterfall trace with only Line In selected. If no noise on
the waterfall I plug into another socket until I finally arrive at Line In.
I found this made quite a difference on my set up when I finally plugged
into the correct place.

Mike Scott__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1

2009-02-21 Thread Bill Johnson
It seems we need to find a set of colored LED's that give similar output as
the reds  With the research done so far, doesn't look at that likely. I
wonder if there are other resources.  I wonder if a resistor pack of a
slightly higher value than 470 might be a better compromise and change the
value of the SWR reds so they won't draw more than the others. This would
help reduce power draw.


73,

Bill
K9YEQ
K2 #35; KX1 #35; K3 #1744; mini mods


-Original Message-
From: Doug Joyce [mailto:d_jo...@sympatico.ca] 
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:40 PM
To: Bill Johnson; 'Dave Van Wallaghen'; 'Jack Smith'
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; 'Ken Kopp'
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1

Bill:  I've done some further testing and believe it's going to take
increasing the current to approx 6 to 7 ma to get the new coloured LEDs to
be bright enough.  That would involve reducing the 2.2 Ks to approx 470 ohms
and finding a source for a suitable resistor pack.  At this higher current
the red LEDs are still brighter than the other colours and there is no easy
way to separately control the current to individual colours.

There are also a number of other things to check such as the ability of the
U3 regulator to handle the increased current.  Battery life will also be
reduced and perhaps this coloured version needs to be run from a wall
wart.

73

Doug,  VE3MV

- Original Message - 


The Professional version does not have this message



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1

2009-02-21 Thread Tom McCulloch
I'm in the process of building the W1 and have substituted the colored LED's
on the SWR readout as has been discussed.

I really haven't been following this thread closely and I haven't finished
the  W1 build yet so this may have already been covered.

I include myself when I say that it seems that everyone seems to be
replacing SOME of the red LED's with the green, amber and yellow jobbies.
And we seem to be using the red LEDs that came with the W1.

Has anyone replaced ALL of the LEDs, including the RED ones.  Wouldn't using
all now LED's from the same manufacturer, and specs give the desired results
of consistent brightness?

Again, I didn't do this because I wasn't aware of the issue when started,
but the LEDs I got from Mouser were relatively inexpensive (about $0.15
each) so this might have been an easier fix.

Perhaps this had previously been covered.

Just a thought

Tom
WB2QDG
K2 1103

- Original Message - 
From: Doug Joyce d_jo...@sympatico.ca
To: Bill Johnson b...@creeksidecomputing.com; 'Dave Van Wallaghen' 
w8...@comcast.net; 'Jack Smith' jack.sm...@cliftonlaboratories.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; 'Ken Kopp' k...@rfwave.net
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1


 Bill:  I've done some further testing and believe it's going to take
 increasing the current to approx 6 to 7 ma to get the new coloured LEDs to
 be bright enough.  That would involve reducing the 2.2 Ks to approx 470 
 ohms
 and finding a source for a suitable resistor pack.  At this higher current
 the red LEDs are still brighter than the other colours and there is no 
 easy
 way to separately control the current to individual colours.

 There are also a number of other things to check such as the ability of 
 the
 U3 regulator to handle the increased current.  Battery life will also be
 reduced and perhaps this coloured version needs to be run from a wall
 wart.

 73

 Doug,  VE3MV

 - Original Message - 
 From: Bill Johnson b...@creeksidecomputing.com
 To: 'Dave Van Wallaghen' w8...@comcast.net; 'Jack Smith'
 jack.sm...@cliftonlaboratories.com
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; 'Ken Kopp' k...@rfwave.net
 Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1


 Thanks for the excellent discussion and possible solutions.  Please
 include
 me in the effort to experiment.  My Hakko 808 hasn't been used for a 
 month
 so I wouldn't mind helping out.  I will gladly put in some $'s to 
 purchase
 parts/share in cost to get at a solution.  Suggestion: if the green and
 yellow output is sufficient and the amber is the only low output, perhaps
 it
 might best to revert back to either yellow or red... the user could
 decide.

 Let me know what I can do.  I would also be ok with replacing the drive
 resistors to boost the LED output for SWR readings: perhaps reducing the
 Power LED output slightly might be a power consideration for battery
 conservation.


 73,

 Bill
 K9YEQ
 K2 #35; KX1 #35; K3 #1744; mini mods


 -Original Message-
 ... my guess is that the W1 was designed for low
 current consumption being battery operated and used for portable ops. So
 I'm sure your calculations are right on.

 ...
 ordered the Lumex line of red, yellow and green leds that Doug spoke
 about. They are all very close in forward voltage and are all rated at
 10mcd output. I also ordered the amber, although it is only rated at
 5mcd and their super red which is rated at 80mcd. I will try these out
 on my W1 to see the differences. Besides, I just bought a new Hakko 808
 I've been wanting to try out.

 My guess is at worst, the power scale leds may be brighter than the SWR
 scale, but I can at least get the SWR uniform in brightness. Other than
 that, it might take replacing the power scale leds as well for those who
 want it totally uniform. Or like Jack alluded to, replacing the series
 resistors which doesn't sound like much fun to me (and possibly
 increasing current consumption).

 I will make current measurements before I replace anything and record
 the changes in current while experimenting. I will post my results back
 to the list. If there is enough interest (and it seems like there is) I
 would not mind ordering these in quantity and a splitting them up 
 73,
 Dave W8FGU

 Jack Smith wrote:
  I have some experience driving LEDs from a PIC (both in my book
  Programming the PIC Microcontroller with MBasic) as well as the Z100 CW
  tuning aid kit that I developed. (Still available, should anyone be
  interested, as well as the book is still in print.)
 
  The Z100 uses red, yellow and  green rectangular LEDs, driven from a 
  PIC
  with a small series resistor.
  http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/z100_tuning_aid.htm for more 
  details.
 
  For all practical purposes, a PIC won't source more than about 20 mA
  even into a short circuit. Looking at the W1's schematic (I don't own
  one) it seems that the maximum current available to 

Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1

2009-02-21 Thread Dave Van Wallaghen
Good Morning Bill,

There has been a lot of back and forth on this, so let me share the 
direction I'm going to take on this.

I ordered red, yellow and green LED's made by Luxen that all have very 
similar specs. My guess is that they will be significantly less bright 
than the existing red LED's and that we would have to play with a 
resistor pack value that would provide the happy medium of brightness 
and current draw (and not stressing the LM78L05 as Jack has pointed out).

Doug has already experimented a little with this and found 470 ohms gave 
him the brightness he desired. At this point, I'm not sure what the 
current draw would be or if that is feasible with the LM78L05.

I believe that I might be able to come up with the right combination of 
LED's and resistor packs to obtain a decent level of brightness with 
uniformity between the LED's without compromising the design with an 
exorbitant current draw.

As I said yesterday, I will take current measurements before I start and 
make comparisons during the experimentation, hopefully arriving at a 
state that provides the happy medium discussed above. I should have most 
of the parts in here sometime early next week.

My desire is to have the least impact possible on the W1 design and 
minimize the impact on the builder as well. And hopefully we can provide 
this solution to new as well as existing units.

Then again, I may be all wet here ;-) I guess the worst case is that I 
have to buy another W1 from Elecraft ;-)

73,
Dave W8FGU



Bill Johnson wrote:
 It seems we need to find a set of colored LED's that give similar output as
 the reds  With the research done so far, doesn't look at that likely. I
 wonder if there are other resources.  I wonder if a resistor pack of a
 slightly higher value than 470 might be a better compromise and change the
 value of the SWR reds so they won't draw more than the others. This would
 help reduce power draw.
 
 
 73,
 
 Bill
 K9YEQ
 K2 #35; KX1 #35; K3 #1744; mini mods
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Doug Joyce [mailto:d_jo...@sympatico.ca] 
 Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:40 PM
 To: Bill Johnson; 'Dave Van Wallaghen'; 'Jack Smith'
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; 'Ken Kopp'
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1
 
 Bill:  I've done some further testing and believe it's going to take
 increasing the current to approx 6 to 7 ma to get the new coloured LEDs to
 be bright enough.  That would involve reducing the 2.2 Ks to approx 470 ohms
 and finding a source for a suitable resistor pack.  At this higher current
 the red LEDs are still brighter than the other colours and there is no easy
 way to separately control the current to individual colours.
 
 There are also a number of other things to check such as the ability of the
 U3 regulator to handle the increased current.  Battery life will also be
 reduced and perhaps this coloured version needs to be run from a wall
 wart.
 
 73
 
 Doug,  VE3MV
 
 - Original Message - 
 
 
 The Professional version does not have this message
 
 
 
 
 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Reminder - UK Elecraft net Sundays 1000 local, 3630 KHz

2009-02-21 Thread Dave G4AON
The frequency is plus or minus the QRM. Note the
start time of 1000 hours to try and minimise
European QRM.

73 Dave, G4AON
K3/100, Acom 1000, dipole







__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: cw xmiting 2 signals 600hz apart: HELP

2009-02-21 Thread Vic K2VCO
Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy wrote:
 Hi Doug,
 
 This certainly happens with the K2.
 
 The cause in the K2 case is that the CW sidetone oscillator signal gets into 
 the VCO's varicap circuit and frequency modulates the VCO. The sidebands 
 that I can see coming from my K2 in CW mode are symmetrical above and below 
 carrier, one pair about 90db below carrier and the others much lower in 
 amplitude. Their level varies with band.

I had a bad case of this with my K2 and fixed it by replacing the quad DAC IC.
-- 
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Fwd:RE:RE:RE:RE Off Topic question about shortwave broadcasting

2009-02-21 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
I don't think anyone ignored you, Jim. According to the time stamps on the
e-mails I got yesterday morning, your answer to the question arrived *after*
Tom, I, and at least one other fellow answered all within a few minutes.

That happens sometimes because there may be a significant delay in the
e-mail server between the time you submit a post and when it is distributed
to others reading the posts. The delay is not the same for everyone. 

In that case I checked for answers just before submitting my response and
there were none - a couple of comments that didn't answer the question but
no answers yet, not even yours. 

Yes, it might feel like a bit of a 'waste of time' when several virtually
identical answers appear like that, but isn't that better than no answer at
all?

Ron AC7AC


-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tom, N5GE
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:30 PM
To: JIM DAVIS
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Fwd:RE:RE:RE:RE Off Topic question about shortwave
broadcasting

On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:39:13 -0800, you wrote:




   Did not anybody get MY EXPLANATION about 40m SW broadcasters earlier???

OH WELL!  Sometimes offering information out here is a WASTE OF TIME!!!


Jim/nn6ee

I think I sent that before you explained the new band plan.

73 es have a good weekend


73,

Tom, N5GE

K3 806
XV144
XV432

http://www.n5ge.com
http://www.swotrc.net

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Another new K3

2009-02-21 Thread Wayne Adams
Hi all. New K3 #2717 here, and thought you old timers might be amused, and
you yet-to-be old timers might be interested in the rig's 1st impressions.

I ordered on Monday, and it arrived in 7 days last Monday, a full week ahead
of when I expected it. I would say it took working on and with it all week
to finally get things under control and feeling very familiar. Today I even
had a chance to hook it up with N1MM and poke around the DX CW contest at
3AM. Yes, my sleep patterns have changes since the K3's arrival.

I run a compromise roof antenna, and prepared for the K3's arrival with a 9'
vertical wire in the corner of the shack for the 2nd receiver Diversity
receive. That's working really well. Even with the marginal setup, I can
hear the propagation switching from ear to ear. I think that's what I like
best.

I have been doing A/B same antenna comparisons between my old FT897 and the
K3, and the DX contest was a perfect opportunity for testing with weak
signals repeating CQ over and over. At first I was surprised to find the
FT897 receiving quite well. In fact strong signals come through much louder
on the FT897's AGC. Most weak signals were present on both rigs. Now I see
(hear) the difference. On the FT897 they're there, but I can not copy. Seems
muddled, and perhaps losing just enough dits here and there to be confusing.
On the K3 weak signals are still weak signals, but the DSP brings them
through sharper with less noise, and the copy is OK. It's the difference
between making or breaking the QSO. I'm sure most on this list already knew
that, but I didn't. If there's a signal to receive at all, it can be done. I
think it's what I like best.

My roof antenna starts right out of the tuner, through walls and ceilings to
the roof where it stretches out for 170'. The 2nd receiver vertical indoor
wire is right next to the feed point. I was only getting light (compared to
loud at times when I really had things screwed up) relay noise from the K3
on 80M. I ran a 20' radial off the indoor antenna's tuner, and the relay
noise is gone. That's luck, and a good sign that all things are fixable with
enough wire.

The Tune feature is really sweet, actually showing the SWR numbers at low
power. The keyer memory is fantastic, and fills in information for 50% of
most QSO content. This is my 1st QSK machine, and it's silent and great. Let
me just say I like what every knob and button does. And I've yet to try
phone and see what awaits me there.

I am happy. I think that's what I like best.

Now if someone would recommend very comfortable headphones to replace the
$15 jobbie that got at Walgreens, I would be even happier.

73,

Wayne WA9VEE
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] K3 phones - separate left/right volume adjustment?

2009-02-21 Thread Bill W4ZV



Karsten Beyer wrote:
 
 Hello, this is Karsten, DL1QC,
 
 I´m slightly handicaped in hearing on left ear, so I hear CW with K3  
 always a litte bit out of the middle. Is there an option or procedure to  
 adjust the level of the stereo phones left/right separately?
  

Not sure if you have the Sub RX but this may work if you do:

MCU 2.67 / 1.96, 11-12-2008

* MAIN/SUB BALANCE CONTROL:  If CONFIG:SUB AF is set to BALANCE,
then the SUB AF GAIN control becomes a main/sub AF balance control when
the sub receiver is turned on (including diversity mode). In this case the
MAIN
AF GAIN controls the AF gain level for both receivers. When SUB AF is at
12 o’ clock, both receivers will be at full volume (main left, sub right).
If SUB AF
is rotated fully counter-clockwise, you’ll hear only the main receiver. If
it’s 
rotated fully clockwise, you’ll hear only the sub receiver. At intermediate
settings
you’ll hear both. A BALANCE control is very useful for contesting and split 
operation. But it can also save a lot of AF gain control tweaking (i.e.,
matching 
main and sub), since MAIN AF controls both main and sub receiver audio.


73,  Bill

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/K3-phones---separate-left-right-volume-adjustment--tp2363403p2364244.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Elecraft] K2 deaf on 40 m

2009-02-21 Thread Svend Spanget
Hi all.

My K2 is working fine on 160m, 80m, 30m and 20m but not 40m. I have
switched between ANT1 and 2. RANT is OFF. Nothing helps...
What went wrong for me?
Any settings to check or could it be a hardware failure?

73,
Svend OZ7UV




TDC Bredbånd for 0 kr.
- Spar 695 kr. Se http://tdc.dk/freemailtilbud/

Denne mail er sendt via Mail på TDC Online
- Læs mere om TDC's mailtjeneste på http://mail.tdconline.dk/

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] K3 phones - separate left/right volume adjustment?

2009-02-21 Thread Jim
Well I did learn something today. Like many I waited until the 2nd receiver
was available adding it to my K3 and had not even attempted to use it for
dual receive split operation until yesterday. On 20 meters working the K5D
when I would turn the sub on I would hear an increase in noise  a rumbling
sound that was very distracting. I checked to ensure both receivers were
same bandwidth, agc, volume etc. Not figuring it out I contacted Support 
was advised to check the REF CAL  VCO CAL. This did not fix it.

Here was the simple solution that I stumbled upon that's in the menu, I
changed SUB AF from NOR to BALANCE.

Now all is well.

73 de KE4WY Jim

  

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill W4ZV
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 11:18 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 phones - separate left/right volume adjustment?




Karsten Beyer wrote:
 
 Hello, this is Karsten, DL1QC,
 
 I´m slightly handicaped in hearing on left ear, so I hear CW with K3  
 always a litte bit out of the middle. Is there an option or procedure to  
 adjust the level of the stereo phones left/right separately?
  

Not sure if you have the Sub RX but this may work if you do:

MCU 2.67 / 1.96, 11-12-2008

* MAIN/SUB BALANCE CONTROL:  If CONFIG:SUB AF is set to BALANCE,
then the SUB AF GAIN control becomes a main/sub AF balance control when
the sub receiver is turned on (including diversity mode). In this case the
MAIN
AF GAIN controls the AF gain level for both receivers. When SUB AF is at
12 o’ clock, both receivers will be at full volume (main left, sub right).
If SUB AF
is rotated fully counter-clockwise, you’ll hear only the main receiver. If
it’s 
rotated fully clockwise, you’ll hear only the sub receiver. At intermediate
settings
you’ll hear both. A BALANCE control is very useful for contesting and split 
operation. But it can also save a lot of AF gain control tweaking (i.e.,
matching 
main and sub), since MAIN AF controls both main and sub receiver audio.


73,  Bill

-- 
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/K3-phones---separate-left-right-volume-adjustment--tp23
63403p2364244.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1

2009-02-21 Thread Doug Joyce
Tom:  Most of this has already been covered to some degree, but let me try
to summarize.

I got from Digi-Key some of the green LEDs from the same mfr (Avago) as the
red ones provided with the W1 kit.  Yellow and amber / orange are also mf'd
by Avago but are not available in reasonable quantities (min order of over
3000 each), so I got some yellow and amber mf'd by Lumex with similar
characteristics.  (part numbers etc are in one of my prior posts).

I installed green for D16, D17  D18 (SWR of 1.1, 1.2 1.3), yellow for D19
 D20 (SWR of 1.5  1.7) and amber for D21 (SWR of 2.0).  When installed on
the W1, all of the new colours are significantly dimmer than the red -
depending on ambient lighting level ranging from very dim to visible.   In
the W1, the current in the LEDs is approx 1.5 ma per LED (calculated as
[5V - 2V (the voltage drop across the LED)] / 2k) and it is switched on and
off to each pair of LEDs by the microprocessor and back and forth from POWER
and SWR by Q3  Q4 (2N7000s).

Using some of the extra LEDs, I hooked up one each of red, green, yellow and
amber to a power supply set for 3 volts with a resistor substitution box and
found that at 1.5 ma the brightness was as when installed in the W1.  To get
the brightness of the new colours up to a reasonable level took approx 6 to
7 ma and the red ones continued to be brighter than the other colours.
(Note that the Luminous Intensity for the Avago LEDs is spec'd at a fwd
current of 20 ma and this design is using fwd currents significantly less
than that.  (Lumex devices have similar spec's).

 The solution seems to be to reduce the value used for the resistor pack
keeping in mind that the reds will always be brighter than the other
colours because of the different fwd current vs luminosity curves for the
different colours at this low current.  With the given circuit layout, it is
not possible to use different value resistors for each colour of LED because
they are driven in pairs and then switched back and forth from POWER to SWR
by Q3  Q4.  Note that RP2A serves to provide the current for both D6 (FWD
Pwr of 1.5W) and D16 (SWR of 1.1:1) and so on.

I'm  going to continue looking for a different value of resistor pack to
increase the visibility of the new colours without compromising the other
aspects of the design - power dissipation in U3, battery life etc.

Hope this helps.

73

Doug,  VE3MV


- Original Message - 
From: Tom McCulloch th...@att.net
To: Doug Joyce d_jo...@sympatico.ca
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1


 I'm in the process of building the W1 and have substituted the colored
LED's
 on the SWR readout as has been discussed.

 I really haven't been following this thread closely and I haven't finished
 the  W1 build yet so this may have already been covered.

 I include myself when I say that it seems that everyone seems to be
 replacing SOME of the red LED's with the green, amber and yellow jobbies.
 And we seem to be using the red LEDs that came with the W1.

 Has anyone replaced ALL of the LEDs, including the RED ones.  Wouldn't
using
 all now LED's from the same manufacturer, and specs give the desired
results
 of consistent brightness?

 Again, I didn't do this because I wasn't aware of the issue when started,
 but the LEDs I got from Mouser were relatively inexpensive (about $0.15
 each) so this might have been an easier fix.

 Perhaps this had previously been covered.

 Just a thought

 Tom
 WB2QDG
 K2 1103



-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 1012 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: cw xmiting 2 signals 600hz apart: HELP

2009-02-21 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
Vic K2VCO wrote on Saturday, February 21, 2009 3:32 PM

 The cause in the K2 case is that the CW sidetone oscillator signal gets 
 into the VCO's varicap circuit and frequency modulates the VCO. The 
 sidebands that I can see coming from my K2 in CW mode are symmetrical 
 above and below carrier, one pair about 90db below carrier and the others 
 much lower in amplitude. Their level varies with band.

 I had a bad case of this with my K2 and fixed it by replacing the quad DAC 
 IC.

-

Hi Vic,

I tried that with my K2, and it should have made some difference, but maybe 
the quad DACs that I bought fell off the back of a truck. So I have not 
bothered to do anything more because the sidebands are so far down, and not 
heard by anyone that I have asked to check when signals are S9+.

This question was asked by Doug about K3s, but I thought that I would 
mention the K2 in case the K3's sidetone signal does something similar.

73,
Geoff
GM4ESD

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1

2009-02-21 Thread Bill Johnson
Is there a red LED with similar characteristics to the other colors so that
increasing the current will not result in the increase in red output
relative to the rest?
I brought all current contributors into the address in the event we move off
list.  I am also collecting into a single file by filtering my mail.

73,

Bill
K9YEQ

-Original Message-
Tom:  Most of this has already been covered to some degree, but let me try
to summarize.

I got from Digi-Key some of the green LEDs from the same mfr (Avago) as the
red ones provided with the W1 kit.  Yellow and amber / orange are also mf'd
by Avago but are not available in reasonable quantities (min order of over
3000 each), so I got some yellow and amber mf'd by Lumex with similar
characteristics.  (part numbers etc are in one of my prior posts).

I installed green for D16, D17  D18 (SWR of 1.1, 1.2 1.3), yellow for D19
 D20 (SWR of 1.5  1.7) and amber for D21 (SWR of 2.0).  When installed on
the W1, all of the new colours are significantly dimmer than the red -
depending on ambient lighting level ranging from very dim to visible.   In
the W1, the current in the LEDs is approx 1.5 ma per LED (calculated as
[5V - 2V (the voltage drop across the LED)] / 2k) and it is switched on and
off to each pair of LEDs by the microprocessor and back and forth from POWER
and SWR by Q3  Q4 (2N7000s).

Using some of the extra LEDs, I hooked up one each of red, green, yellow and
amber to a power supply set for 3 volts with a resistor substitution box and
found that at 1.5 ma the brightness was as when installed in the W1.  To get
the brightness of the new colours up to a reasonable level took approx 6 to
7 ma and the red ones continued to be brighter than the other colours.
(Note that the Luminous Intensity for the Avago LEDs is spec'd at a fwd
current of 20 ma and this design is using fwd currents significantly less
than that.  (Lumex devices have similar spec's).

 The solution seems to be to reduce the value used for the resistor pack
keeping in mind that the reds will always be brighter than the other
colours because of the different fwd current vs luminosity curves for the
different colours at this low current.  With the given circuit layout, it is
not possible to use different value resistors for each colour of LED because
they are driven in pairs and then switched back and forth from POWER to SWR
by Q3  Q4.  Note that RP2A serves to provide the current for both D6 (FWD
Pwr of 1.5W) and D16 (SWR of 1.1:1) and so on.

I'm  going to continue looking for a different value of resistor pack to
increase the visibility of the new colours without compromising the other
aspects of the design - power dissipation in U3, battery life etc.

Hope this helps.
73
Doug,  VE3MV

- Original Message - 
 I'm in the process of building the W1 and have substituted the colored
LED's
 on the SWR readout as has been discussed.

 I really haven't been following this thread closely and I haven't finished
 the  W1 build yet so this may have already been covered.

 I include myself when I say that it seems that everyone seems to be
 replacing SOME of the red LED's with the green, amber and yellow jobbies.
 And we seem to be using the red LEDs that came with the W1.

 Has anyone replaced ALL of the LEDs, including the RED ones.  Wouldn't
using
 all now LED's from the same manufacturer, and specs give the desired
results
 of consistent brightness?

 Again, I didn't do this because I wasn't aware of the issue when started,
 but the LEDs I got from Mouser were relatively inexpensive (about $0.15
 each) so this might have been an easier fix.

 Perhaps this had previously been covered.

 Just a thought

 Tom
 WB2QDG
 K2 1103



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1

2009-02-21 Thread Bill Johnson
Doug, Perhaps we should all by additional units just for experimenting. A
bit of fun, don't you think?


73,

Bill
K9YEQ

-Original Message-
From: Dave Van Wallaghen [mailto:w8...@comcast.net] 
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 8:53 AM
To: Bill Johnson
Cc: 'Doug Joyce'; 'Jack Smith'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net; 'Ken Kopp'
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1

Good Morning Bill,

There has been a lot of back and forth on this, so let me share the 
direction I'm going to take on this.

I ordered red, yellow and green LED's made by Luxen that all have very 
similar specs. My guess is that they will be significantly less bright 
than the existing red LED's and that we would have to play with a 
resistor pack value that would provide the happy medium of brightness 
and current draw (and not stressing the LM78L05 as Jack has pointed out).

Doug has already experimented a little with this and found 470 ohms gave 
him the brightness he desired. At this point, I'm not sure what the 
current draw would be or if that is feasible with the LM78L05.

I believe that I might be able to come up with the right combination of 
LED's and resistor packs to obtain a decent level of brightness with 
uniformity between the LED's without compromising the design with an 
exorbitant current draw.

As I said yesterday, I will take current measurements before I start and 
make comparisons during the experimentation, hopefully arriving at a 
state that provides the happy medium discussed above. I should have most 
of the parts in here sometime early next week.

My desire is to have the least impact possible on the W1 design and 
minimize the impact on the builder as well. And hopefully we can provide 
this solution to new as well as existing units.

Then again, I may be all wet here ;-) I guess the worst case is that I 
have to buy another W1 from Elecraft ;-)

73,
Dave W8FGU



Bill Johnson wrote:
 It seems we need to find a set of colored LED's that give similar output
as
 the reds  With the research done so far, doesn't look at that likely.
I
 wonder if there are other resources.  I wonder if a resistor pack of a
 slightly higher value than 470 might be a better compromise and change the
 value of the SWR reds so they won't draw more than the others. This would
 help reduce power draw.
 
 
 73,
 
 Bill
 K9YEQ
 K2 #35; KX1 #35; K3 #1744; mini mods
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Doug Joyce [mailto:d_jo...@sympatico.ca] 
 Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:40 PM
 To: Bill Johnson; 'Dave Van Wallaghen'; 'Jack Smith'
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; 'Ken Kopp'
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Leds for W1
 
 Bill:  I've done some further testing and believe it's going to take
 increasing the current to approx 6 to 7 ma to get the new coloured LEDs to
 be bright enough.  That would involve reducing the 2.2 Ks to approx 470
ohms
 and finding a source for a suitable resistor pack.  At this higher current
 the red LEDs are still brighter than the other colours and there is no
easy
 way to separately control the current to individual colours.
 
 There are also a number of other things to check such as the ability of
the
 U3 regulator to handle the increased current.  Battery life will also be
 reduced and perhaps this coloured version needs to be run from a wall
 wart.
 
 73
 
 Doug,  VE3MV
 
 - Original Message - 
 
 
 The Professional version does not have this message
 
 
 
 
 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Birdies

2009-02-21 Thread Larry

I have had success in eliminating birdies using Waynes new program. I think
the existing approach is sufficent in that you only have to do it
once/birdie.  So its no big deal.  As Wayne noted some birdies requie more
than one shift and its not clear [to me] when to shift up or down. Would
guess with time I will understand that.
So help is on th way!!!   Larry moore w6od

Robert Dorchuck wrote:
 
 I recently installed the KRX3 and seem to have some of the birdie problems
 others have noted, the loudest on 14.186.7 (S3).  The others are masked
 when connected to an antenna and are not a problem.
 
 I have tried adjusting the cables and saw some improvement but it will
 not be a solution as Wayne noted.  Has anyone tried the test firmware
 that Wayne mentioned a week or so ago?
 
 Thanks all,
 Bob  W6VY
 
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/K3-Birdies-tp2361933p2364647.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 deaf on 40 m

2009-02-21 Thread Hans Østnell
Svend,

Chack the bandpass filters. Especially check the capasitor values in the
BP-filters. I bet that you will find the soultion of your problem there.

73!

Hans / LA2MOA

2009/2/21 Svend Spanget span...@privat.dk

  Hi all.

 My K2 is working fine on 160m, 80m, 30m and 20m but not 40m. I have
 switched between ANT1 and 2. RANT is OFF. Nothing helps...
 What went wrong for me?
 Any settings to check or could it be a hardware failure?

 73,
 Svend OZ7UV

 

 TDC Bredbånd for 0 kr.
 - Spar 695 kr. Se http://tdc.dk/freemailtilbud/

 Denne mail er sendt via Mail på TDC Online
 - Læs mere om TDC's mailtjeneste på http://mail.tdconline.dk/
 

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] K2 deaf on 40 m

2009-02-21 Thread Don Wilhelm
Svend,

Is this a newly built K2, or one that used to work and has now failed.  
Do you have the K60XV option?
If it is newly built, check to be certain you have installed C6 (on the 
bottom of the RF Board near the rear panel) correctly.  Its leads should 
be in the outer holes of the set of 3 holes between L1 and L2.

If you installed the headers for the K60XV option (or the rework 
eliminators), you must insert the board into J15.  Does it receive on 60 
meters?

If this is a K2 that worked before, there is likely some failure in 
either in the Bandpass Filter or the Low Pass Filter.
Does it transmit on 40 meters?

73,
Don W3FPR


Svend Spanget wrote:
 Hi all.

 My K2 is working fine on 160m, 80m, 30m and 20m but not 40m. I have 
 switched between ANT1 and 2. RANT is OFF. Nothing helps...
 What went wrong for me?
 Any settings to check or could it be a hardware failure? 

 73,
 Svend OZ7UV

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Just finished building my K3

2009-02-21 Thread James Sarte
Dear group,

 

Just finished building my K3!  It took me about 10 hours from start to
finish.  I ran into a few problems, but thankfully nothing major.

 

My K3 is a 100w version with sub receiver and full complement of filters on
both sub and main receivers.  A transverter board and voice recorder module
are also installed.

 

Lessons learned:

 

1.  Don't drink while putting this kit together. without realizing, I
ended up getting pretty drunk during the course of assembly just sipping on
beer.  Mistakes can and will happen when you're tired AND drunk.
2.  Screw drivers and circuit board traces don't mix. see item number 1.
(My screwdriver slipped when I was trying to pry the sub receiver board out
of its metal casing and scratched a few of the small traces.  Fortunately,
no major damage and the circuit remained in tact.  Also, those damn holes on
the sub receiver board don't line up with the metal shield.  This is why I
had to take the thing out in the first place and sand the nubs down with a
dremel.)
3.  Read the assembly manual at least 3 times from cover to cover before
you even start building.  It really helped knowing ahead of time what's
expected.
4.  Have a small pair of diagonal cutters.  Cutting jumper W1 and W2 for
the transverter board was a pain in the ass.  I had to go to the store at
10PM last night to look for cuticle cutters (I should have listened to you
Gary).
5.  Don't work tired!!!  I kept pushing myself to finish last night, and
while I didn't complete it I ended up making mistakes.  I forgot to install
the voice recorder and ended up having to take the front panel off again.
6.  Sleep for 8 hours before resuming assembly if you have to stop
assembly at night.  I went to bed at 4AM and woke up at 9AM to finish.
While I was cleaning up, I pulled the power plug for my PS out of the power
strip.  I wasn't paying attention and my thumb and pointer finger hit the
two power plug terminals WHILE it was still half way into the socket.
Suffice it to say, I didn't need coffee this morning and my skin is still
tingling.  It's no fun getting electrocuted.

 

Anyway, this thing works great now that I have everything calibrated and
installed.  Thanks to all the folks out there that took the time to answer
my questions and help me out.

 

Gary Smith - special thanks to you for the assembly tips and the filters.

 

73,

James KC2UEE

 

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] [K3]PSK31 DM780

2009-02-21 Thread Steve Ward
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:59:38 +, Dave Van Wallaghen wrote:

 Has anyone else using DM780 with a K3 noticed that very strong psk sigs 
 produce other images on the waterfall? It is about 2k further up or down from 
 the original signal and can be decoded on the screen although weaker. I'm 
 also running LP-Pan but don't notice the images on the panadapter.
   
Also check your NB settings, I've found that the more aggressively the 
noise blanker is working the more likely the ghost signals are to 
appear.  OTOH, I have not yet gotten to the AF mods so I am probably 
seeing a combination of factors.

73,
Steve
AD7OG
K3 S/N 1544
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 deaf on 40 m

2009-02-21 Thread Svend Spanget
Don,

thank you for answering! This K2 used to work, but after I got my K3, it
was left in the background...
It will tune to a good SWR.
The K60XV option is not installed.

73
Svend, OZ7UV

- Original meddelelse -

 Fra: Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com
 Til: Svend Spanget span...@privat.dk
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Dato: Lør, 21. feb 2009 19:57
 Emne: Re: [Elecraft] K2 deaf on 40 m
 
 Svend,
 
 Is this a newly built K2, or one that used to work and has now
 failed.
 Do you have the K60XV option?
 If it is newly built, check to be certain you have installed C6 (on
 the
 bottom of the RF Board near the rear panel) correctly. Its leads
 should
 be in the outer holes of the set of 3 holes between L1 and L2.
 
 If you installed the headers for the K60XV option (or the rework
 eliminators), you must insert the board into J15. Does it receive on
 60
 meters?
 
 If this is a K2 that worked before, there is likely some failure in
 either in the Bandpass Filter or the Low Pass Filter.
 Does it transmit on 40 meters?
 
 73,
 Don W3FPR
 
 
 Svend Spanget wrote:
  Hi all.
 
  My K2 is working fine on 160m, 80m, 30m and 20m but not 40m. I have
  switched between ANT1 and 2. RANT is OFF. Nothing helps...
  What went wrong for me?
  Any settings to check or could it be a hardware failure?
 
  73,
  Svend OZ7UV
 




TDC Bredbånd for 0 kr.
- Spar 695 kr. Se http://tdc.dk/freemailtilbud/

Denne mail er sendt via Mail på TDC Online
- Læs mere om TDC's mailtjeneste på http://mail.tdconline.dk/

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] Just finished building my K3

2009-02-21 Thread drewko
Its quarter to three,
Theres no one in the place cept K3 and me
So set em up joe
I got a little story I think you oughtta know...


73,
Drew
AF2Z



On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:10:15 -0500, James KC2UEE wrote:

Dear group,

 

Just finished building my K3!  It took me about 10 hours from start to
finish.  I ran into a few problems, but thankfully nothing major.

 

My K3 is a 100w version with sub receiver and full complement of filters on
both sub and main receivers.  A transverter board and voice recorder module
are also installed.

 

Lessons learned:

 

1. Don't drink while putting this kit together. without realizing, I
ended up getting pretty drunk during the course of assembly just sipping on
beer.  Mistakes can and will happen when you're tired AND drunk.
2. Screw drivers and circuit board traces don't mix. see item number 1.
(My screwdriver slipped when I was trying to pry the sub receiver board out
of its metal casing and scratched a few of the small traces.  Fortunately,
no major damage and the circuit remained in tact.  Also, those damn holes on
the sub receiver board don't line up with the metal shield.  This is why I
had to take the thing out in the first place and sand the nubs down with a
dremel.)
3. Read the assembly manual at least 3 times from cover to cover before
you even start building.  It really helped knowing ahead of time what's
expected.
4. Have a small pair of diagonal cutters.  Cutting jumper W1 and W2 for
the transverter board was a pain in the ass.  I had to go to the store at
10PM last night to look for cuticle cutters (I should have listened to you
Gary).
5. Don't work tired!!!  I kept pushing myself to finish last night, and
while I didn't complete it I ended up making mistakes.  I forgot to install
the voice recorder and ended up having to take the front panel off again.
6. Sleep for 8 hours before resuming assembly if you have to stop
assembly at night.  I went to bed at 4AM and woke up at 9AM to finish.
While I was cleaning up, I pulled the power plug for my PS out of the power
strip.  I wasn't paying attention and my thumb and pointer finger hit the
two power plug terminals WHILE it was still half way into the socket.
Suffice it to say, I didn't need coffee this morning and my skin is still
tingling.  It's no fun getting electrocuted.

 

Anyway, this thing works great now that I have everything calibrated and
installed.  Thanks to all the folks out there that took the time to answer
my questions and help me out.

 

Gary Smith - special thanks to you for the assembly tips and the filters.

 

73,

James KC2UEE

 

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 deaf on 40 m

2009-02-21 Thread Don Wilhelm
Svend,

In that case, try the Cheap and Dirty Signal Tracing in the K2 that 
you can download from the Elecraft website Builder's Resource page then 
Troubleshooting Tips link.
The direct link is 
http://www.elecraft.com/TechNotes/SigTr/K2%20Cheap%20%27n%20Dirty%20Signal%20Tracing.pdf.

That should reveal whether the problem is with the bandpass filter or 
the low pass filter.

Once you have located the problem area, check the soldering - yes, even 
though it used to work, there could still be an unsoldered or poorly 
soldered connection that has finally developed enough oxidation to now fail.

If the soldering is good, the next item to check is the relay  K1 if the 
problem is in the bandpass filter or K12 in the low pass filter.  Set 
the band to 40 meters and check for continuity directly across the relay 
contacts with your ohmmeter.  The relays are latching, so they can be 
checked after power is removed from the K2. The schematic shows the 
relays in their non-selected position (i.e. when 40 meters is selected, 
there should be continuity between K1 pins 3 and 4, but not pins 2 and 3).

73,
Don W3FPR

Svend Spanget wrote:
 Don,

 thank you for answering! This K2 used to work, but after I got my K3, 
 it was left in the background...
 It will tune to a good SWR.
 The K60XV option is not installed.

 73
 Svend, OZ7UV


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [K3]PSK31 DM780

2009-02-21 Thread Dave Van Wallaghen
Thanks for the suggestion Steve. I usually default the NB and NR off 
until I need them and I rarely use them. But that makes sense.

As an update to this topic, first, thanks to everyone here who made 
suggestions. It was a great learning experience for me.

I did go back and adjust the input to my soundcard. It is on a laptop 
and the only input is a mic connection. Looking at the setup on the 
computer, I found that the gain was turned up all the way at 100% with 
some special processing enabled for voice. I turned it down to about 35% 
and disabled the special processing on the line.

I also found that my CONFIG: LIN OUT was set at 20! I don't know when I 
did that, but I went through the setup of my soundcard as Jim described 
by starting out with everything at a minimum. I then brought the levels 
up until I could see decoding with DM780. I then wound up with the 
CONFIG: LIN OUT setting at 4 with good decoding and no noticeable 
harmonics on the screen.

On my DM780 waterfall, the noise level is just visible on the bottom of 
the Spectrum  Grid window and weak signals are now fairly visible in 
the waterfall. The audio level monitor on DM780 now shows in the low 20% 
range as opposed to the upper 60's and occasional Overload as it did before.

As a test, I then worked back to back Italian stations on 40m at 30 
watts. Works for me :-)

Thanks again  73,
Dave W8FGU

Steve Ward wrote:
 On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:59:38 +, Dave Van Wallaghen wrote:
 
 Has anyone else using DM780 with a K3 noticed that very strong psk sigs 
 produce other images on the waterfall? It is about 2k further up or down 
 from the original signal and can be decoded on the screen although weaker. 
 I'm also running LP-Pan but don't notice the images on the panadapter.
   
 Also check your NB settings, I've found that the more aggressively the 
 noise blanker is working the more likely the ghost signals are to 
 appear.  OTOH, I have not yet gotten to the AF mods so I am probably 
 seeing a combination of factors.
 
 73,
 Steve
 AD7OG
 K3 S/N 1544
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Kx-1 ---help

2009-02-21 Thread Garrett, Russ
I'm moving through the bands just fine until it is supposed to nove to 14 mhz.  
Instead it shows as 13?  This must be something simple.  Did not have this 
problem last night.  

Thanks
Russ
Kd7mpk


--
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Russ Garrett
Bullivant|Houser|Bailey PC
805 Broadway Street, Suite 400
Vancouver, WA  98660-3310
mailto:russ.garr...@bullivant.com
direct dial: 360.737.3363 - fax: 360.695.8504 http://www.bullivant.com Seattle 
. Vancouver . Portland . Sacramento . San Francisco . Las Vegas

mail.bullivant.com made the following annotations
-
Please be advised that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax 
advice contained in this e-mail, including attachments, is not intended to be 
used by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be 
imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.
*
This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains 
information belonging to Bullivant Houser Bailey, which is confidential and/or 
legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking of any action in 
reliance on the contents of this e-mail information is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender 
by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

-

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] K3 phones - separate left/right volume adjustment?

2009-02-21 Thread Carl Clawson
Elecraft: my vote is yes, please!

As Bill mentioned, there is a balance control only if you are using the
subreciever.

I also have a hearing imbalance and would greatly appreciate a left/right
balance control that operates regardless of whether the subreceiver is on or
off. With subreceiver on, the operation of it would be as it is now --
either balance or subreceiver volume depending on a menu selection. With the
subreceiver off or absent it would be left/right balance. 

73 and thanks for listening
Carl WS7L
K3 #486

 -Original Message-
 
 Hello, this is Karsten, DL1QC,
 
 I´m slightly handicaped in hearing on left ear, so I hear CW 
 with K3 always a litte bit out of the middle. Is there an 
 option or procedure to adjust the level of the stereo phones 
 left/right separately?
 vy 73 es tnx for all
 de Karsten - DL1QC

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Speaker vibrations and other oddities

2009-02-21 Thread James Sarte
Just built my K3. first, the speaker vibrates even with the foam donut on
the end of the shield. also, the sub receiver doesn't seem to have the same
volume output as the main even if both RF and AF pots are set the same.
Suggestions?

 

73,

James KC2UEE

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] Kx-1 ---help

2009-02-21 Thread wayne burdick
Hi Russ,

What you see when changing bands is the MHz value that you're tuned to 
on each band. You must have the VFO tuned below 14 MHz on 20 m.

73,
Wayne
N6KR

On Feb 21, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Garrett, Russ wrote:

 I'm moving through the bands just fine until it is supposed to nove to 
 14 mhz.  Instead it shows as 13?  This must be something simple.  Did 
 not have this problem last night. 


---

http://www.elecraft.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 phones - separate left/right volume adjustment?

2009-02-21 Thread ni0c
I also have a slight difference between my two ears, and have the K3, but no 
SubRx (yet!).  

I found a very nice pair of stereo headphones at Radio Shack that have separate 
volume controls.  I'm not sure of the part number-- the only number I can find 
on my set is 06A08.  MFJ makes a monaural set (MFJ-392B) with separate volume 
controls.

Both of these headsets have worked well for me; however I prefer the stereo 
sound that can utilize the AFX in the K3.

73,

Chuck Guenther  NI0C
K3 s/n 1061
   __
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net Announcement

2009-02-21 Thread Phil and Christina
Hi gang,

The weekly Elecraft SSB net will meet tomorrow (Sunday, 2/22/09) at 1800Z.
We will start at 14.316 MHz, and QSY if needed.  The net control is in
western Oregon, but we will need a good east coast or midwest station to
relay a few west coast signals that may be too close to net control.
Join us if you need a break from the DX contest or for any other reason.
See you there.

73,

Phil, NS7P

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] ZN-QRP Paddle

2009-02-21 Thread Jim Miller
Just posted a review on eham of my new ZN-QRP paddle.

Very, very nicely executed. Form follows function and it functions
beautifully.

http://www.eham.net/reviews/review/78283

I'm completely spoiled now with this beauty plugged into my K3/10.

73

jim ab3cv (just a very satisfied customer)
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] Kx-1 ---help

2009-02-21 Thread Garrett, Russ
Thanks.   I rotated the vfo first thinking that was it.  Didn't rotate it far 
enough.  Now I'm back.  Thanks Wayne.   


--
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Russ Garrett
Bullivant|Houser|Bailey PC
805 Broadway Street, Suite 400
Vancouver, WA  98660-3310
mailto:russ.garr...@bullivant.com
direct dial: 360.737.3363 - fax: 360.695.8504 http://www.bullivant.com Seattle 
. Vancouver . Portland . Sacramento . San Francisco . Las Vegas


- Original Message -
From: wayne burdick n...@elecraft.com
To: Garrett, Russ
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sat Feb 21 13:28:20 2009
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Kx-1 ---help

Hi Russ,

What you see when changing bands is the MHz value that you're tuned to 
on each band. You must have the VFO tuned below 14 MHz on 20 m.

73,
Wayne
N6KR

On Feb 21, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Garrett, Russ wrote:

 I'm moving through the bands just fine until it is supposed to nove to 
 14 mhz.  Instead it shows as 13?  This must be something simple.  Did 
 not have this problem last night. 


---

http://www.elecraft.com


mail.bullivant.com made the following annotations
-
Please be advised that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax 
advice contained in this e-mail, including attachments, is not intended to be 
used by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be 
imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.
*
This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains 
information belonging to Bullivant Houser Bailey, which is confidential and/or 
legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking of any action in 
reliance on the contents of this e-mail information is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender 
by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

-

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Elecraft] K3 sub receiver settings questions

2009-02-21 Thread James Sarte
Dear group,

 

I've been playing around with the sub receiver with a goal to SWL.  The way
I have my K3 set up is to have the general receive module on the sub.  The
main has a 13k, 6k, 2.7k, and .5k filter in FL1, Fl2, FL3, and FL4
respectively.  The sub receiver has a 13k, 2.7k, and .5k in FL1, FL3, and
Fl4 slots.

 

Now, when listening to the sub receiver, I've noticed that I cannot change
filter settings for the sub unless I go into B-SUB.  When I go into B-SUB
however, the audio level drops quite a bit, even though I'm still listening
to the sub receiver and the RF gain hasn't changed.  I'm not sure how to
best explain it, but you can definitely tell that you've gone to B-SUB mode
as the volume drops.  This does not change if the main receiver's RF and AF
settings match the sub receiver.

 

Is there a way to link the main receiver filter controls to the sub
receiver  And what gives with the lowered audio signal when switching to
B-SUB?

 

73,

James KC2UEE

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] Speaker vibrations and other oddities

2009-02-21 Thread Bob Garrett
Jim,

Did you set the sub preamp to on?  If not, you would have a different volume 
level in the sub versus the main RX.

73,  Bob K3UL__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Elecraft] CW to Data for RTTY

2009-02-21 Thread jpk5lad
I'm trying some new things and I've run into a problem.  I'm trying 
to use the CW to Data for RTTY feature and I don't get any 
results.  If I'm on CW, I can send CW via the paddles, and if I try 
DATA/PSK D (31 bPS) the CW to PSK31 works correctly (outputs 
PSK 31).
If I try to set up DATA/AFSK A (45 bPS), I get nothing.  Going 
back to the other two configurations, it works properly so I know 
the paddles are working.  This is the first time I've tried it so I can't 
say, It worked before but not now.

Is there a CONFIG setting that I've missed?

The receive decoder is working properly on RTTY and I'm able to 
decode both on the VFO B display and the K3 Utility's terminal 
screen.

It's just the CW to RTTY sending that's got me corn-fused  I 
hope someone will say, Oh, yeah, I had that same problem and I 
_  I need to know 
what goes in that blank.

Thanks and 73,
Jim - K5LAD




It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something
stupid to say and then don't say it. -- Sam Levenson
=
My Web Page - http://www.hayseed.net/~jpk5lad


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] CW to Data for RTTY

2009-02-21 Thread wayne burdick
Jim,

You need to use FSK-D, not AFSK-A, to do CW-to-RTTY. AFSK-A is an 
audio-transmit mode, like DATA-A, while FSK-D is for direct input 
from either a computer or the K3's keyer paddle.

This is covered pretty well in the owner's manual, around page 34 
(CW-to-DATA).

73,
Wayne
N6KR

On Feb 21, 2009, at 3:13 PM, jpk5...@cox.net wrote:

 I'm trying some new things and I've run into a problem.  I'm trying
 to use the CW to Data for RTTY feature and I don't get any
 results.  If I'm on CW, I can send CW via the paddles, and if I try
 DATA/PSK D (31 bPS) the CW to PSK31 works correctly (outputs
 PSK 31).
 If I try to set up DATA/AFSK A (45 bPS), I get nothing.  Going
 back to the other two configurations, it works properly so I know
 the paddles are working.  This is the first time I've tried it so I 
 can't
 say, It worked before but not now.

 Is there a CONFIG setting that I've missed?

 The receive decoder is working properly on RTTY and I'm able to
 decode both on the VFO B display and the K3 Utility's terminal
 screen.

 It's just the CW to RTTY sending that's got me corn-fused  I
 hope someone will say, Oh, yeah, I had that same problem and I
 _  I need to know
 what goes in that blank.

 Thanks and 73,
 Jim - K5LAD




 It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something
 stupid to say and then don't say it. -- Sam Levenson
 =
 My Web Page - http://www.hayseed.net/~jpk5lad


 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



---

http://www.elecraft.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] CW to Data for RTTY

2009-02-21 Thread jpk5lad
Thanks Wayne --
That's the area in the book I'd been looking at and I thought I'd 
tried them all but obviously not.  Sure enough, that works.

Thanks for you help.  Perhaps now I can get those guys at K5D 
on RTTY.  

Hey, you do good work!
73,
Jim - K5LAD


On 21 Feb 2009 at 15:21, wayne burdick wrote:

 Jim,
 
 You need to use FSK-D, not AFSK-A, to do CW-to-RTTY. AFSK-A is an 
 audio-transmit mode, like DATA-A, while FSK-D is for direct input 
 from either a computer or the K3's keyer paddle.
 
 This is covered pretty well in the owner's manual, around page 34 
 (CW-to-DATA).
 
 73,
 Wayne
 N6KR
 
 On Feb 21, 2009, at 3:13 PM, jpk5...@cox.net wrote:
 
  I'm trying some new things and I've run into a problem.  I'm trying
  to use the CW to Data for RTTY feature and I don't get any
  results.  If I'm on CW, I can send CW via the paddles, and if I try
  DATA/PSK D (31 bPS) the CW to PSK31 works correctly (outputs
  PSK 31).
  If I try to set up DATA/AFSK A (45 bPS), I get nothing.  Going
  back to the other two configurations, it works properly so I know
  the paddles are working.  This is the first time I've tried it so I 
  can't
  say, It worked before but not now.
 
  Is there a CONFIG setting that I've missed?
 
  The receive decoder is working properly on RTTY and I'm able to
  decode both on the VFO B display and the K3 Utility's terminal
  screen.
 
  It's just the CW to RTTY sending that's got me corn-fused  I
  hope someone will say, Oh, yeah, I had that same problem and I
  _  I need to know
  what goes in that blank.
 
  Thanks and 73,
  Jim - K5LAD
 
 
 
 
  It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something
  stupid to say and then don't say it. -- Sam Levenson
  =
  My Web Page - http://www.hayseed.net/~jpk5lad
 
 
  __
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
 
 
 ---
 
 http://www.elecraft.com
 

It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something
stupid to say and then don't say it. -- Sam Levenson
=
My Web Page - http://www.hayseed.net/~jpk5lad


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] CW to RTTY

2009-02-21 Thread Evert Bakker (PA2KW)
I have firmware version 2.67/1.96.

In this version it is still not possible to use CW to RTTY when using SPLIT.

Has this been fixed in the newer firmware version?

 

I now use XIT, but this is not so powerfull.

 

73's, Evert PA2KW

 

 

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] ZN-QRP Paddle

2009-02-21 Thread Sam Morgan
for others that may have been as confused as I was,
here are some additional links:
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/7169
http://www.n3znkeys.com/

just a confused link follower g
-- 
GB  73
KA5OAI
Sam Morgan

Jim Miller wrote:
 Just posted a review on eham of my new ZN-QRP paddle.
  
 Very, very nicely executed. Form follows function and it functions 
 beautifully.
  
 http://www.eham.net/reviews/review/78283
  
 I'm completely spoiled now with this beauty plugged into my K3/10.
  


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] (no subject)

2009-02-21 Thread W0MU Mike Fatchett
I just received the W2ENY headset. 

After trying them out I was very disappointed.

This headset is a Frisby brand FHP-100.  After doing a bit of research this
headset can be purchased online for under $10.00.  He has added the
conversion mic cables that go to various radios.  He sells them for $50.00.

The MIC in this headset is not communication quality.  The response is far
too wide for communications work.  If you wanted to get an equalizer or mess
with your mic settings you might get it to work well.  Otherwise your audio
is going to sound like mush.

The headphones are not very comfortable.  I cannot see using this headset
for long durations.

His website advertises noise cancelling and there is none for either the
headphones of the mic.

This is a headset designed for computer and web type applications.

Hopefully I will be able to send it back for a refund.  If not one of the
kids can use it on their computers.  


I also purchased two of the footswitch options.  They are made by Treadlite
and are good quality.  They come with an 1/8 inch plug on it which I will
change over to an rca.


Mike W0MU


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] W2ENY headset

2009-02-21 Thread Ralph Tyrrell
Mike:
Thank you for your report.
I would have mailed off an order tomorrow. Thanks again.
Now will hold off.

I bought the Warren Gregoire headset, very comfortable, good reports on sound 
quality. BUT it is not  stereo, therefor the AFX in the K3 is not working. 

I do have stereo speakers that work well.

Using the 
Elecraft MH-2 (good quality) and Sony headphones, cheep and not very good.

Still looking for a good head set for the K3.  Next step?

thanks, 

Ty, W1TF, K2 #696


--- On Sat, 2/21/09, W0MU Mike Fatchett w...@w0mu.com wrote:

 From: W0MU Mike Fatchett w...@w0mu.com
 Subject: [Elecraft] (no subject)
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Cc: 'reflector cq-contest' cq-cont...@contesting.com
 Date: Saturday, February 21, 2009, 7:28 PM
 I just received the W2ENY headset. 
 
 After trying them out I was very disappointed.
 
 This headset is a Frisby brand FHP-100.  After doing a bit
 of research this
 headset can be purchased online for under $10.00.  He has
 added the
 conversion mic cables that go to various radios.  He sells
 them for $50.00.
 
 The MIC in this headset is not communication quality.  The
 response is far
 too wide for communications work.  If you wanted to get an
 equalizer or mess
 with your mic settings you might get it to work well. 
 Otherwise your audio
 is going to sound like mush.
 
 The headphones are not very comfortable.  I cannot see
 using this headset
 for long durations.
 
 His website advertises noise cancelling and there is none
 for either the
 headphones of the mic.
 
 This is a headset designed for computer and web type
 applications.
 
 Hopefully I will be able to send it back for a refund.  If
 not one of the
 kids can use it on their computers.  
 
 
 I also purchased two of the footswitch options.  They are
 made by Treadlite
 and are good quality.  They come with an 1/8 inch plug on
 it which I will
 change over to an rca.
 
 
 Mike W0MU



  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] (no subject)

2009-02-21 Thread Grant Youngman
I don't think you said which model you purchased.

Just out of curiosity, I checked the eHam reviews -- all pretty good,  
and looked at the info on his website.  While I've never touched one  
of these, he advertises the microphone element as being wide  
range (100Hz-16Khz) , so that shouldn't have been much of a surprise  
if you were looking for nicely pinched communications audio out of  
the box.

There is no advertising or specification reference to noise  
cancellation in the headset, and the mic is likely typical of most  
ported acoustic noise cancellation mics.  It's apparently acoustic  
(given the pricing) and not electronic, probably doesn't work  
miracles, but probably does lower the level of extraneous background  
noise a bit.

Doesn't sound like what one gets for $50 was misrepresented ...


Grant/NQ5T




On Feb 21, 2009, at 6:28 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:

 I just received the W2ENY headset.


 The MIC in this headset is not communication quality.  The response  
 is far
 too wide for communications work.



 His website advertises noise cancelling and there is none for either  
 the
 headphones of the mic.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] W2ENY headset

2009-02-21 Thread Rob May

I like these from Micro Innovations:
http://tinyurl.com/d8rsc4
I run them on the K3 with the EQ set flat and get unsolicited compliments on 
the audio all the time.  I've had them for 6 months so far and they seem 
durable enough.  For less that $20, you can't go wrong.  I wear them backwards 
so that the mic ends up on the left side because the radio is to my left and 
the computer is in front of me.  I use a footswitch for PTT.
Rob
NV5E

 Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:56:08 -0800
 From: w...@yahoo.com
 To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [Elecraft] W2ENY headset
 
 Mike:
 Thank you for your report.
 I would have mailed off an order tomorrow. Thanks again.
 Now will hold off.
 
 I bought the Warren Gregoire headset, very comfortable, good reports on sound 
 quality. BUT it is not  stereo, therefor the AFX in the K3 is not working. 
 
 I do have stereo speakers that work well.
 
 Using the 
 Elecraft MH-2 (good quality) and Sony headphones, cheep and not very good.
 
 Still looking for a good head set for the K3.  Next step?
 
 thanks, 
 
 Ty, W1TF, K2 #696
 
 
 --- On Sat, 2/21/09, W0MU Mike Fatchett  wrote:
 
 From: W0MU Mike Fatchett 
 Subject: [Elecraft] (no subject)
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Cc: 'reflector cq-contest' 
 Date: Saturday, February 21, 2009, 7:28 PM
 I just received the W2ENY headset. 
 
 After trying them out I was very disappointed.
 
 This headset is a Frisby brand FHP-100.  After doing a bit
 of research this
 headset can be purchased online for under $10.00.  He has
 added the
 conversion mic cables that go to various radios.  He sells
 them for $50.00.
 
 The MIC in this headset is not communication quality.  The
 response is far
 too wide for communications work.  If you wanted to get an
 equalizer or mess
 with your mic settings you might get it to work well. 
 Otherwise your audio
 is going to sound like mush.
 
 The headphones are not very comfortable.  I cannot see
 using this headset
 for long durations.
 
 His website advertises noise cancelling and there is none
 for either the
 headphones of the mic.
 
 This is a headset designed for computer and web type
 applications.
 
 Hopefully I will be able to send it back for a refund.  If
 not one of the
 kids can use it on their computers.  
 
 
 I also purchased two of the footswitch options.  They are
 made by Treadlite
 and are good quality.  They come with an 1/8 inch plug on
 it which I will
 change over to an rca.
 
 
 Mike W0MU
 
 
 
   
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

_
Access your email online and on the go with Windows Live Hotmail.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_AE_Access_022009
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] (no subject)

2009-02-21 Thread W0MU Mike Fatchett
Sorry about that.

This is the premium headset 


A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may
never get over. Ben Franklin
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Grant Youngman
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:03 PM
To: Elecraft Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] (no subject)

I don't think you said which model you purchased.

Just out of curiosity, I checked the eHam reviews -- all pretty good, and
looked at the info on his website.  While I've never touched one of these,
he advertises the microphone element as being wide range (100Hz-16Khz) ,
so that shouldn't have been much of a surprise if you were looking for
nicely pinched communications audio out of the box.

There is no advertising or specification reference to noise cancellation in
the headset, and the mic is likely typical of most ported acoustic noise
cancellation mics.  It's apparently acoustic (given the pricing) and not
electronic, probably doesn't work miracles, but probably does lower the
level of extraneous background noise a bit.

Doesn't sound like what one gets for $50 was misrepresented ...


Grant/NQ5T




On Feb 21, 2009, at 6:28 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:

 I just received the W2ENY headset.


 The MIC in this headset is not communication quality.  The response is 
 far too wide for communications work.



 His website advertises noise cancelling and there is none for either 
 the headphones of the mic.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] W2ENY headset

2009-02-21 Thread Dale Putnam

Headset... headset... that's so I can hear cw better... what's that thing in 
front for?

*LOL*

 

duckin, and runnin for the safety of the paddles..

--... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy


 
 From: roblitesp...@hotmail.com
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:08:51 -0600
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] W2ENY headset
 
 
 I like these from Micro Innovations:
 http://tinyurl.com/d8rsc4
 I run them on the K3 with the EQ set flat and get unsolicited compliments on 
 the audio all the time. I've had them for 6 months so far and they seem 
 durable enough. For less that $20, you can't go wrong. I wear them backwards 
 so that the mic ends up on the left side because the radio is to my left and 
 the computer is in front of me. I use a footswitch for PTT.
 Rob
 NV5E
 

_
Windows Live™ Hotmail®…more than just e-mail. 
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_hm_justgotbetter_howitworks_022009__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Elecraft] Just finished building my K3

2009-02-21 Thread Don Rasmussen
 1.  Don't drink while putting this kit together. without realizing, I
ended up getting pretty drunk during the course of assembly just sipping on
beer.  Mistakes can and will happen when you're tired AND drunk. 

Agreed - That's the down side. On the plus side, if you attach the ground clip 
from your antistatic mat to the beer can, this will ensure you are always 
grounded (given proper to generous consumption rates). 

As they say, one can never be too well grounded. ;-)

I completed my new K3 last Monday and was in such an excited hurry I forgot to 
drink alltogether. But somehow everything came together and I have made 
hundreds of QSO's, including this weekend in the ARRL DX CW contest. The 
signals are very strong to JA, BD, KH and even though I only have the 2.7 
roofing filter that comes with the K3, performance is 100%.

Contacts are with DX and Alaska/Hawaii only, report is RST and state for US 
stations, RST and power for the Dx. 

[Elecraft] Just finished building my K3
James Sarte kc2uee at gmail.com 
Sat Feb 21 14:10:15 EST 2009 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Just finished building my K3

2009-02-21 Thread James Sarte

Don,

My beer cans were large, but not well grounded...

I have the 2.7k filter for both receivers; didn't bother with the 2.8's, and
so far no complaints. 

I ordered matched filters for diversity and all 5 pole filters were -.73
with no deviation.  (sweet)  

Now I just have to figure out if I can adjust filters for the sub with the
main controls instead of having to go into the SUB-B menu.

I really wish I had some chocolate though... craving chocolate now.

Woohoo, thpppt, and 73,
James too tired to type yet too wired to stay coherent any longer Sarte

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Don Rasmussen
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 9:00 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Just finished building my K3

 1.  Don't drink while putting this kit together. without realizing, I
ended up getting pretty drunk during the course of assembly just sipping on
beer.  Mistakes can and will happen when you're tired AND drunk. 

Agreed - That's the down side. On the plus side, if you attach the ground
clip from your antistatic mat to the beer can, this will ensure you are
always grounded (given proper to generous consumption rates). 

As they say, one can never be too well grounded. ;-)

I completed my new K3 last Monday and was in such an excited hurry I forgot
to drink alltogether. But somehow everything came together and I have made
hundreds of QSO's, including this weekend in the ARRL DX CW contest. The
signals are very strong to JA, BD, KH and even though I only have the 2.7
roofing filter that comes with the K3, performance is 100%.

Contacts are with DX and Alaska/Hawaii only, report is RST and state for US
stations, RST and power for the Dx. 



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Just finished building my K3

2009-02-21 Thread Richard Ferch
James Sarte wrote:

 Now I just have to figure out if I can adjust filters for the sub with the
 main controls instead of having to go into the SUB-B menu.

How about A/B, adjust filters, A/B? 

This seems to work here. You can set the filters using the main controls,
then the A/B transfers them to the sub and brings back the original main
settings, frequency and mode.

There is one exception to this (is this a bug or a missing feature?): the
RTTY dual-tone filter. It seems that the only way to have the DTF set
differently on the subRX than on the main is to use BSET. After you set or
clear the DTF in BSET using the DUAL PB button, the change also applies to
the main RX (this does not appear to happen with other filter settings), but
you can reverse it with the DUAL PB button without affecting the subRX, so
you can have DTF on in one VFO and off in the other. However, when you do an
A/B or turn the subRX off, the previous VFO B DTF setting is lost and it
reverts to the same DTF setting as the main RX.

73,
Rich VE3KI
 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Announcement

2009-02-21 Thread Kevin Rock
Good Evening,
   It was a nice, sunny week here on the mountain.  There is still snow but the 
sun helps.  I have received a couple reports concerning 40 meters near net time 
but they are not promising.  The time change next week may help so please keep 
sending reception reports to me.  I will reinstate the 40 meter net soon though 
because my fingers are getting itchy!  Even if it is just me and hopefully one 
other that is OK.  I can always read while I am sending my CQ ECN.  
   Hopefully your dawn skies are clear because Comet Lulin is near its closest 
approach to earth.  It is in the morning sky in Virgo.  Here is a sky map URL 
for you: 
http://www.spaceweather.com/images2009/20feb09/skymap_north_lulin.gif?PHPSESSID=cpobuv33pg4c33t242fdfd6r57
  Binoculars show it clearly if your skies are transparent and dark.  If your 
eyes are good and the skies are too you will not need optical aid.  

Please join us tomorrow evening.
 
1) Hail signs  (first letter or two of the suffix of your call)
2) NCS help (as well as QSP/QNP relay help)
 
Sunday 2300z (Sunday 3 PM PST) 14050 kHz

   Stay warm,
  Kevin.  KD5ONS

-
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Command to read KAT3 settings

2009-02-21 Thread Marian Morys
Hi,

Is there a way to read  the L and C settings of the KAT3 after auto-tune
cycle? Either computer command or control panel readout would work for me.

73,

Marian

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] CW to RTTY

2009-02-21 Thread David Yarnes
Evert, 

Are you sure you are engaging FSK-D rather than FSK-A?  Also, if you are trying 
to use an external keyer, it won't work.  You have to use the internal keyer.  
I've been working RTTY split, using paddle input, with no problem and through 
all the updates.  

Dave W7AQK

  
  - Original Message 
  From: Evert Bakker (PA2KW) 
  To: 'Elecraft Discussion List' 
  Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:36 PM
  Subject: [Elecraft] CW to RTTY


  I have firmware version 2.67/1.96.

  In this version it is still not possible to use CW to RTTY when using SPLIT.

  Has this been fixed in the newer firmware version?

   

  I now use XIT, but this is not so powerfull.

   

  73's, Evert PA2KW

   

   

   



--


  __
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] Command to read KAT3 settings

2009-02-21 Thread wayne burdick
Sure, Marian. Just set CONFIG:KAT3 to LCSET, then exit the menu. Next, 
tap ATU TUNE. Instead of starting ATU tuning, this will display the L 
and C settings (Ct/Ca configuration and C value on VFO A, L on VFO B). 
In fact you can then tap ANT to change Ct/Ca, and rotate VFO A and B to 
change C and L, respectively, if you want to manually adjust the match.

73,
Wayne
N6KR

On Feb 21, 2009, at 8:17 PM, Marian Morys wrote:

 Hi,
 Is there a way to read  the L and C settings of the KAT3 after 
 auto-tune cycle? Either computer command or control panel readout 
 would work for me.
 73,
 Marian
  

---

http://www.elecraft.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html