Re: EN 55024 Annex A.1
Joe, The test was done by Nemko Canada using the clamp method. The clamp was calibrated a few hours before my test. The equipment was 10 cm over a ground plane, and they were monitoring the test voltage with a clamp to be sure not to overtest. Is the coupling network a better bet than the clamp? Our card does not have a ground plane and I suspect that this is part of the problem. Also the components for setting impedances could be closer to the chip. But before we scramble to fix the board I'd like to be sure it is possible to do with the AMD component. Their AEs are trying to get me this information, if you could put me in touch with your contact who passed with this chip that could help too. Thanks again for your input. Best regards, David.
Re: EN 55024 Annex A.1
In a message dated 5/24/01, David Gelfand writes: When we inject as per IEC 61000-4-6, the 1 kHz tone is demodulated and is VERY loud in the telephone earpiece! This happens no matter which i/o cable we inject, even the power cord. Hi David: While it is not surprising for an unprotected SLIC port to have trouble with the 61000-4-6 test, I think it is abnormal for the problem to be equally pronounced when cables other than tip/ring are being tested. There may be a problem with your ground connections and/or test setup. Are you using CDNs or the clamp method? Do you have a good ground plane as specified in the standard? I recently purchased most of the equipment required to perform this test, and I have been experimenting in the lab to characterize various DAAs and SLICs. I have found that the results I get are somewhat dependent on the specifics of the test setup. The first thing I would suggest is that you review your test setup to be sure it fully complies with 61000-4-6. I have not tested the AM79R70, but I did run some quick tests on a circuit that used the Intersil HC55183, which is also a ringing SLIC. In that test, the SLIC was pretty quiet at carrier frequencies above 1 MHz, but there was some 1 KHz demodulation at lower frequencies. I have not had time to experiment with possible fixes. I do know of someone who is using the AM79R70 and claims that they have passed this test. Unfortunately, I do not know the details. By the way, don't feel too bad if you are having trouble with this test. It is a brutal test, and most people I know who have tested their existing designs have failed. Since passing this test becomes mandatory on July 1 for CE marking, I expect that there will be a lot of activity as the July 1 date approaches. Joe Randolph Telecom Design Consultant Randolph Telecom, Inc. 781-721-2848 http://www.randolph-telecom.com
RTTE or only EMC / LVD ?
Hi Group, A satellite (range 10-14GHz) consists of two parts, the modulation unit (IDU= in door unit) and the RF unit (ODU= out door unit). The two units are connected together with a coaxial cable which can be up to 100m long and it carry the IF signal of a couple hundreds MHz. The ODU consists of an up-converter, amplifier, antenna and so on, while the IDU is the modulator/demodulator, power unit and generating the IF signal. We assume (for sure) that the complete system is covered by RTTE. But the IDU will also be available as a stand-alone unit on the marked. No teleterminal connections are available from the IDU, only RS-232 input and IF output on coax cable to the ODU. Our question is: For the IDU, will RTTE apply or will only EMC (and LVD) apply, as a stand-alone unit? We feel this system looks like a broadband TV-cable system. You have a RF transmitter, but it only transmits via cable. No harm on the RF spectrum. Best regards Amund Westin, Oslo/Norway -- Get your firstname@lastname email for FREE at http://Nameplanet.com/?su --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
Double Crimp - History Request
Folks, A while back I recall some interesting discussion revolving around the double crimp requirements of connectors onto conductors. The discussion held many interesting views in terms of what double crimp means and what the origins of the requirement were but alas, I can't seem to locate the threads on the RCIC archives. If anyone has a copy of the discussion threads, could someone please forward it on to me? My opinion and not that of my employer. Thanks in Advance, Kaz Gawrzyjal kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
RE: Cable Drawing Standards
Dick: Do you have this document available as a file? Please reply to the list so that others may contact you off-list to request a copy. Regards, Ed Ed Price ed.pr...@cubic.com Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab Cubic Defense Systems San Diego, CA USA 858-505-2780 (Voice) 858-505-1583 (Fax) Military Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis -Original Message- From: Dick Grobner [mailto:dick.grob...@medgraph.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 7:50 AM To: 'Veit, Andy' Cc: IEEE EMC-PSTC E-Mail Forum (E-mail) Subject: RE: Cable Drawing Standards Good Day Andy About three years ago I had the same dilemma. I searched and found no such standard that was directed toward just this subject. There are many articles written and published in magazines, technical books, etc. dealing with proper cable construction. I then decided that I would compile all of this info into an internal engineering standard titled - Shielded Cable Assemblies. This standard deals with molded signal cables used to externally interface our medical devices. These cables are sourced externally. So far, it seems to be doing the job! I reference this engineering standard on our cable specifications and a copy goes to all of our suppliers of this commodity. If you wish, I could send a copy of the document as a reference. Let me know if you would like a copy! I would be curious from the rest of the forum if such a standard does exist. I guess we will wait and see! -Original Message- From: Veit, Andy [mailto:andy.v...@mts.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 7:35 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Cable Drawing Standards All- I have an unusual request for information. I was recently asked if there are standards for cable construction, and standards that describe how a desired construction is to be documented - i.e. preferred ways to terminate shields on a connector backshell and how to show this type of information as clearly and unambiguously as possible on cable drawings. I am guessing that many of you have probably come across this type of thing before, either in your current work or in a past life. Are there IEEE, ANSI, MIL or other standards that are commonly used as guides when creating cable assembly drawings/documentation? I have also been told that workmanship standards exist as well, but I have not been able to locate any yet. Thank you- -Andy Andrew Veit MTS Systems --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
RE: EN 61000-3-2 and -3 equipment
Agilent are supposed to be writing a software upgrade to cover A14 of EN61000-3-2. There is no sign of it yet though. Regards Chris Colgan Compliance Engineer TAG McLaren Audio Ltd The Summit, Latham Road Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU *Tel: +44 (0)1480 415 627 *Fax: +44 (0)1480 52159 * Mailto:chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com * http://www.tagmclarenaudio.com -Original Message- From: Lothar Schmidt [SMTP:lothar.schm...@cetecomusa.com] Sent: 23 May 2001 19:10 To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' Subject: EN 61000-3-2 and -3 equipment Does anybody know which equipment is available here in the US to do this tests after Agilent decided not to continue their product? Which are the estimated costs for it? Each information is welcome. Best Regards Lothar Schmidt Technical Manager EMC/Bluetooth, BQB, Competent Body Cetecom Inc. 411 Dixon Landing Road Milpitas, CA 95035 Phone: +1 (408) 586 6214 Fax: +1 (408) 586 6299 ** Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com ** The contents of this E-mail are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this E-mail in error, please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either by E-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the E-mail. TAG McLaren Audio Ltd The Summit, 11 Latham Road Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU Telephone : 01480 415600 (+44 1480 415600) Facsimile : 01480 52159 (+44 1480 52159) ** Please visit us at www.tagmclarenaudio.com ** --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
RE: Cable Drawing Standards
Good Day Andy About three years ago I had the same dilemma. I searched and found no such standard that was directed toward just this subject. There are many articles written and published in magazines, technical books, etc. dealing with proper cable construction. I then decided that I would compile all of this info into an internal engineering standard titled - Shielded Cable Assemblies. This standard deals with molded signal cables used to externally interface our medical devices. These cables are sourced externally. So far, it seems to be doing the job! I reference this engineering standard on our cable specifications and a copy goes to all of our suppliers of this commodity. If you wish, I could send a copy of the document as a reference. Let me know if you would like a copy! I would be curious from the rest of the forum if such a standard does exist. I guess we will wait and see! -Original Message- From: Veit, Andy [mailto:andy.v...@mts.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 7:35 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Cable Drawing Standards All- I have an unusual request for information. I was recently asked if there are standards for cable construction, and standards that describe how a desired construction is to be documented - i.e. preferred ways to terminate shields on a connector backshell and how to show this type of information as clearly and unambiguously as possible on cable drawings. I am guessing that many of you have probably come across this type of thing before, either in your current work or in a past life. Are there IEEE, ANSI, MIL or other standards that are commonly used as guides when creating cable assembly drawings/documentation? I have also been told that workmanship standards exist as well, but I have not been able to locate any yet. Thank you- -Andy Andrew Veit MTS Systems --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall, --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
RE: Cable Drawing Standards
There are IPC standards here is one example, I am sure there are more; IPC-3710 - Acceptability of Wiring/Cable Harnesses, Electronic Cable Assemblies, Cord Sets, and Wires I am pretty sure these documents will not accommodate EMI design. That will be left to your imagination and expertise. These IPC documents help establish commonality of procedure throughout your company to the ever developing industry standards. It is basically a way of doing something consistently in manufacturing. I did not search the whole site but here is the address http://www.ipc.org/. They may have what your looking for. Check it out. Mark --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
Re: EN 61000-3-2 and -3 equipment
Lothar, Some years ago I used the harmonic analyzer and flicker equipment from the German company Spitzenberger + Spies. It worked very good. Check http://www.spitzenberger.de/ I guess they have an US dealer. Good luck! Best regards Amund Westin, Oslo/Norway On Wed, 23 May 2001 21:41:25 +0100 John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote: 5EFB06767D7DD211828C0008C74CE95B414981@CALVIN, Lothar Schmidt lothar.schm...@cetecomusa.com inimitably wrote: Does anybody know which equipment is available here in the US to do this tests after Agilent decided not to continue their product? Which are the estimated costs for it? Enquire again from Agilent. I believe they had second thoughts. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839 Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Why not call a vertically- applied manulo-pedally-operated quasi-planar chernozem-penetrating and excavating implement a SPADE? --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall, -- Get your firstname@lastname email for FREE at http://Nameplanet.com/?su --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
Cable Drawing Standards
All- I have an unusual request for information. I was recently asked if there are standards for cable construction, and standards that describe how a desired construction is to be documented - i.e. preferred ways to terminate shields on a connector backshell and how to show this type of information as clearly and unambiguously as possible on cable drawings. I am guessing that many of you have probably come across this type of thing before, either in your current work or in a past life. Are there IEEE, ANSI, MIL or other standards that are commonly used as guides when creating cable assembly drawings/documentation? I have also been told that workmanship standards exist as well, but I have not been able to locate any yet. Thank you- -Andy Andrew Veit MTS Systems --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
RE: CISPR Compliant Spectrum analyzer/receiver
The EMC-30 is spec'd for 75% relative humidity -- and they mean it. If you operate the instrument in RH above this, you will loose control, i.e., seems to be some shorting between front panel control functions. -- From: Ken Javor[SMTP:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] Reply To: Ken Javor Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:59 PM To: Wolak, Marvin; EMC-PSTC Newsgroup (E-mail) Subject: Re: CISPR Compliant Spectrum analyzer/receiver I would look at the Electrometrics EMC-30 and the Carnel NM 17/27. I think these have built-in quasi-peak detection, but I'm not sure. Both of these machines have tunable front ends (built-in preselection). -- From: Wolak, Marvin marvin.wo...@marconi.com To: EMC-PSTC Newsgroup (E-mail) emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: CISPR Compliant Spectrum analyzer/receiver Date: Wed, May 23, 2001, 11:11 AM I need to rent a CISPR 16 compliant spectrum analyzer/receiver over the frequency range 0.15 - 30 MHz. Any suggestions? I'm familiar with the good ol' HP 8566 / 8568 (Do I need the preselector with them for CISPR 16 compliance?), and the RS ESI. What else may be out there available in the rental shops? Thanks, Marvin Wolak Marconi Networks --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall, --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall, --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
Re: CISPR Compliant Spectrum analyzer/receiver
You could always use the worlds best kept secret, a Schaffner EMI receiver... There are 2, both fully CISPR compliant. Derek Walton. --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
RE: MIL-STD-185
The DoD standards base is at: http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ In this case, Mil-Std-185, a spec on copper alloys, has been cancelled. It may have been superseded by a Federal Standard 185A, also about copper alloys, and also cancelled. There is now an SAE-AMS-STD-185, on copper alloys. You have to buy this commercial document. (I sent Andy the SAE address.) Regards, Ed Ed Price ed.pr...@cubic.com Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab Cubic Defense Systems San Diego, CA USA 858-505-2780 (Voice) 858-505-1583 (Fax) Military Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis -Original Message- From: Pettit, Ghery [mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:38 PM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Cc: 'a.podgor...@ieee.org' Subject: MIL-STD-185 All, Andy Podgorski (a.podgor...@ieee.org) is looking for a copy of MIL-STD-185. He isn't a participant on this board (but I suggested to him that he ought to be), so I'm posting this for him. I haven't heard of this document and, courtesy of a recent hard drive crash, I don't have the URL of a source I used to have for downloading mil specs. If anyone knows where to find this (and other) mil specs, would you please let Andy know directly (and I wouldn't mind a refresher on the URL, either). Thanks for your help. Ghery Pettit Intel --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
MIL-STD-185
All, Andy Podgorski (a.podgor...@ieee.org) is looking for a copy of MIL-STD-185. He isn't a participant on this board (but I suggested to him that he ought to be), so I'm posting this for him. I haven't heard of this document and, courtesy of a recent hard drive crash, I don't have the URL of a source I used to have for downloading mil specs. If anyone knows where to find this (and other) mil specs, would you please let Andy know directly (and I wouldn't mind a refresher on the URL, either). Thanks for your help. Ghery Pettit Intel --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
Re: EN 50021 question
a9713061f01ad411b0f700d0b746ca6801550...@vacho6misge.cho.ge.com, Biggs, Daniel (IndSys, GEFanuc, NA) daniel.bi...@gefanuc.com inimitably wrote: In 1999, pR EN 50021 went to EN 50021. My question is...why have the spacings for Pollution degree 2 been changed between the preliminary version to the adopted version of 50021. The spacing requirements seem to have increased. A prEN is an unapproved draft. The subject was still under active discussion in IEC TC28 and IEC TC64 at the time, and the thinking changed between the prEN and the EN. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839 Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Why not call a vertically- applied manulo-pedally-operated quasi-planar chernozem-penetrating and excavating implement a SPADE? --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
Re: EN 61000-3-2 and -3 equipment
5EFB06767D7DD211828C0008C74CE95B414981@CALVIN, Lothar Schmidt lothar.schm...@cetecomusa.com inimitably wrote: Does anybody know which equipment is available here in the US to do this tests after Agilent decided not to continue their product? Which are the estimated costs for it? Enquire again from Agilent. I believe they had second thoughts. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839 Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Why not call a vertically- applied manulo-pedally-operated quasi-planar chernozem-penetrating and excavating implement a SPADE? --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on Virtual Conference Hall,
