Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-24 Thread Lawrence Rhodes via EV
My comment to Toyota:

I have been an electric vehicle and alternative energy enthusiast  
professional for two decades.  It was 1997 when a Kummerow electric vehicle 
powered by a Zinc air battery went 1000 miles on a charge.  However it took 
three days and 4 drivers.  It was a golf cart like vehicle limited to 25 mph.  
They simply circled the former Alameda Naval Air Station.  That was 18 years 
ago.  A lot has changed since then.  I've owned several Hondas that got 50 or 
more miles per gallon,(manufactured from 1980 to 1995) A CNG Dodge Van  
numerous electric vehicles http://www.evalbum.com/611 .  Toyota is by far the 
most competent manufacturer on the planet.  Everyone comes to you to learn how 
to make a better assembly line.  However it is obvious that you didn't do the 
math on Fuel Cells.  Using the EPA mileage rating all the BEV models have well 
over 100MPGE(around 120) while fuel cells struggle hit 60 mpge.  It will cost 
twice as much to run a fuel cell vehicle in fuel.  The Mirai is twice a
 s expensive as most BEV vehicles.  While this may change with mass production 
the math will never work for the fuel efficiency.  It will always be twice as 
expensive in fuel to run a fuel cell vehicle.  Much progress has been made in 
solar vehicles.  The addition of the cruiser class at the World Solar Challenge 
which is for practical 2 to 4 passenger solar vehicles proves that you can have 
a vehicle that is not a rolling ping pong table yet will have a 500 mile range 
on 16 kw of batteries and 1.5kw of solar panels.  Stella, the winner of the 
first cruiser class World solar challenge, will never need conventional fueling 
in normal use.  That means all you have to do is park it in the sun and you are 
fueled.  However if you drive steady long distances or at night frequently it 
will fuel like any other BEV.  
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2767806/Meet-Stella-solar-powered-car-drives-500-miles-SINGLE-charge-warns-traffic-lights-change.html
  Toyota I challenge yo
 u to produce a vehicle that requires little or no additional fuel from outside 
sources.  This is the vehicle that everyone will want.  Not fuel cells.  An 
autonomous solar vehicle.  The World Solar Challenge has proven this.  Just 
make it light and efficient and the design will work.  If Dutch students can do 
it Toyota can do it.
Lawrence Rhodes
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-24 Thread Mark Abramowitz via EV


Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 24, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Lawrence Rhodes via EV ev@lists.evdl.org wrote:

 
 It will always be twice as expensive in fuel to run a fuel cell vehicle.

This statement puzzled me. What about future pricing of fuel for a BEV would 
cause the price to rise so much?

Or do you expect the cost of hydrogen to drop that much? If so, could you share 
why you think so? I would be astounded if that were to be the case.
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



[EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-23 Thread Robert Bruninga via EV
Earlier today, I  got an email from Toyota promoting their Fool Cell
vehicle (with no reply address).

So I went to the Toyota web site and found the CONTACT link and filled out
an on-line email telling them to stop throwing good money after bad in
last years ideas (Fool cells) and to come out with a competitive Toyota
BEV...

IN less than 3 hours, I got a response:

We are sorry to hear of your concerns with Toyota's positioning of the
fuel cell vehicle. We respect your opinions regarding both
battery-electric vehicles and the FCV, and have documented your comments
at our National Headquarters, where they remain available for review from
the appropriate departments. It is through feedback such as yours we are
able to monitor and improve upon the quality of our products and
services.

If they are actively sending out a broad reach advertising campaign for
their FCV, then they are also obviously open to feedback!

Bob, WB4APR
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-23 Thread Ben Goren via EV
On Apr 23, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Cor van de Water via EV ev@lists.evdl.org wrote:

 [T]his industry has put it into law that you can get
 credits for providing a zero-emission long range vehicle[]

I think it would make the contrast between BEVs and FCVs much starker if the 
requirement wasn't tailpipe emissions but well-to-wheel emissions.

In that case, FCVs have little hope of competing, since basically all of the 
hydrogen comes from mined hydrocarbons with said carbon being released into the 
atmosphere before the hydrogen is delivered to the vehicle. BEVs, on the other 
hand, can be entirely solar powered -- and many of those on the road already 
are.

The absolute best that a FCV can possibly hope for is to use solar power to 
analyze water and collect the hydrogen to power the car. Seen that way, it's 
obvious that the fool cell is in direct competition with a battery...and, given 
an hour of insolation on a square meter of panels, I just don't see a FCV going 
anywhere near as far on the resulting charge as a BEV.

Maybe somebody else has done (or knows) the math and could put some hard 
numbers to it? I'd be willing to eat my words.

b
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: 
http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150423/8ed3891a/attachment.pgp
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-23 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
On 24 Apr 2015 at 1:08, Peri Hartman via EV wrote:

 Eventually people will wise up to the taxes, aka subsidies, needed to
 support a fuel cell auto industry when they start wondering where
 their tax payments are going.  Education will shorten that time. 

Watch out, that's a sharp two-edged sword.  If we're not careful, it'll 
swing the other way, and cut off BEV subsidies too.

David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
EVDL Administrator

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
EVDL Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
Note: mail sent to evpost and etpost addresses will not 
reach me.  To send a private message, please obtain my 
email address from the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-23 Thread Jorg Brown via EV
Surely, rather than fighting _against_ FCVs, we should be fighting _with_
them, against our common enemy the internal combustion engine?

https://youtu.be/kHHitXxH-us?t=44s

(I'm not a big fan of FCVs, but it seems to me they will go away on their
own; we don't need to hasten their demise, other than perhaps to get states
like California to stop spending our taxes on them.)

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Robert Bruninga via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
wrote:

 Earlier today, I  got an email from Toyota promoting their Fool Cell
 vehicle (with no reply address).

 So I went to the Toyota web site and found the CONTACT link and filled out
 an on-line email telling them to stop throwing good money after bad in
 last years ideas (Fool cells) and to come out with a competitive Toyota
 BEV...

 IN less than 3 hours, I got a response:

 We are sorry to hear of your concerns with Toyota's positioning of the
 fuel cell vehicle. We respect your opinions regarding both
 battery-electric vehicles and the FCV, and have documented your comments
 at our National Headquarters, where they remain available for review from
 the appropriate departments. It is through feedback such as yours we are
 able to monitor and improve upon the quality of our products and
 services.

 If they are actively sending out a broad reach advertising campaign for
 their FCV, then they are also obviously open to feedback!

 Bob, WB4APR
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150423/3205398c/attachment.htm
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-23 Thread Ben Goren via EV
On Apr 23, 2015, at 9:10 PM, EVDL Administrator via EV ev@lists.evdl.org 
wrote:

 On 24 Apr 2015 at 1:08, Peri Hartman via EV wrote:
 
 Eventually people will wise up to the taxes, aka subsidies, needed to
 support a fuel cell auto industry when they start wondering where
 their tax payments are going.  Education will shorten that time. 
 
 Watch out, that's a sharp two-edged sword.  If we're not careful, it'll 
 swing the other way, and cut off BEV subsidies too.

Any time anybody complains about subsidies going to electric vehicle 
manufacturers I just have to roll my eyes and ask about the auto industry 
bailout.

Same thing with solar energy and our military expenditures to ensure compliant 
regimes in oil-producing lands -- not to mention corporate welfare in general.

You want a level playing field? Look at what gasoline costs in Europe. How well 
do you think Detroit could compete with EVs if cheap gasoline was $8 / gallon?

...sorry, preaching to the choir, I know

b
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: 
http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150423/fe3123e3/attachment.pgp
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-23 Thread Cor van de Water via EV
I have the impression that no matter how hard we argue here until we are blue 
in the face
(and it will edify some and give a solid background about *why* they are called 
fool cells)
it will not sway much of the  compliance car that Toyota is building (or the 
battery swap
that Tesla is doing), simply because this industry has put it into law that you 
can get
credits for providing a zero-emission long range vehicle, which is seen as 
required by
the lawmakers and only two variants are being offered / developed at the moment:
Hydrogen refilling (no matter how clumsy and inefficient and lacking 
infrastructure)
and battery swapping (no matter that only a single station needed to be 
demonstrated).
There you have it, as far as I know that is the reason we see what we see.
To change this, we better watch legislators more closely / lobby better and 
educate them
where we can, so we can get rid of these monstrosities and focus on things that 
work,
such as BEV and get those into mainstream with all the money available instead 
of
wasting it on pipe-dreams.

Let me know if I am besides the point...

Cor van de Water
Chief Scientist
Proxim Wireless

office +1 408 383 7626  Skype: cor_van_de_water
XoIP   +31 87 784 1130  private: cvandewater.info
www.proxim.com


This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and 
proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you received this 
message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any unauthorized 
use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of this message is 
prohibited.


-Original Message-
From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of Mr23 via EV
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 4:44 PM
To: ev@lists.evdl.org
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

Bob, thanks for writing in about your effort and the response. It spurred me 
into action, I went there and submitted my thoughts on the Prius (I have an 
'02, and on the newest models), but more so on the FCV vs BEV debate. Perhaps 
many of us could sway them, eventually.
Thanks again,
-Chris

On 4/23/2015 5:03 PM, Robert Bruninga via EV wrote:
 Earlier today, I  got an email from Toyota promoting their Fool Cell 
 vehicle (with no reply address).

 So I went to the Toyota web site and found the CONTACT link and filled 
 out an on-line email telling them to stop throwing good money after 
 bad in last years ideas (Fool cells) and to come out with a 
 competitive Toyota BEV...

 IN less than 3 hours, I got a response:

 We are sorry to hear of your concerns with Toyota's positioning of 
 the fuel cell vehicle. We respect your opinions regarding both 
 battery-electric vehicles and the FCV, and have documented your 
 comments at our National Headquarters, where they remain available for 
 review from the appropriate departments. It is through feedback such 
 as yours we are able to monitor and improve upon the quality of our 
 products and services.

 If they are actively sending out a broad reach advertising campaign 
 for their FCV, then they are also obviously open to feedback!

 Bob, WB4APR
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-23 Thread Peri Hartman via EV
Yep.  Better education is the key.  Eventually people will wise up to 
the taxes, aka subsidies, needed to support a fuel cell auto industry 
when they start wondering where their tax payments are going.  Education 
will shorten that time.


Peri

-- Original Message --
From: Cor van de Water via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List ev@lists.evdl.org
Sent: 23-Apr-15 5:48:18 PM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell 
vehicle


I have the impression that no matter how hard we argue here until we 
are blue in the face
(and it will edify some and give a solid background about *why* they 
are called fool cells)
it will not sway much of the  compliance car that Toyota is building 
(or the battery swap
that Tesla is doing), simply because this industry has put it into law 
that you can get
credits for providing a zero-emission long range vehicle, which is seen 
as required by
the lawmakers and only two variants are being offered / developed at 
the moment:
Hydrogen refilling (no matter how clumsy and inefficient and lacking 
infrastructure)
and battery swapping (no matter that only a single station needed to be 
demonstrated).
There you have it, as far as I know that is the reason we see what we 
see.
To change this, we better watch legislators more closely / lobby better 
and educate them
where we can, so we can get rid of these monstrosities and focus on 
things that work,
such as BEV and get those into mainstream with all the money available 
instead of

wasting it on pipe-dreams.

Let me know if I am besides the point...

Cor van de Water
Chief Scientist
Proxim Wireless

office +1 408 383 7626 Skype: cor_van_de_water
XoIP   +31 87 784 1130 private: cvandewater.info
www.proxim.com


This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential 
and proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you 
received this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender. 
 Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part 
of this message is prohibited.



-Original Message-
From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of Mr23 via EV
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 4:44 PM
To: ev@lists.evdl.org
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell 
vehicle


Bob, thanks for writing in about your effort and the response. It 
spurred me into action, I went there and submitted my thoughts on the 
Prius (I have an '02, and on the newest models), but more so on the FCV 
vs BEV debate. Perhaps many of us could sway them, eventually.

Thanks again,
-Chris

On 4/23/2015 5:03 PM, Robert Bruninga via EV wrote:

 Earlier today, I  got an email from Toyota promoting their Fool Cell
 vehicle (with no reply address).

 So I went to the Toyota web site and found the CONTACT link and 
filled

 out an on-line email telling them to stop throwing good money after
 bad in last years ideas (Fool cells) and to come out with a
 competitive Toyota BEV...

 IN less than 3 hours, I got a response:

 We are sorry to hear of your concerns with Toyota's positioning of
 the fuel cell vehicle. We respect your opinions regarding both
 battery-electric vehicles and the FCV, and have documented your
 comments at our National Headquarters, where they remain available 
for

 review from the appropriate departments. It is through feedback such
 as yours we are able to monitor and improve upon the quality of our
 products and services.

 If they are actively sending out a broad reach advertising campaign
 for their FCV, then they are also obviously open to feedback!

 Bob, WB4APR
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)




___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)





___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-23 Thread Mr23 via EV
Bob, thanks for writing in about your effort and the response. It 
spurred me into action, I went there and submitted my thoughts on the 
Prius (I have an '02, and on the newest models), but more so on the FCV 
vs BEV debate. Perhaps many of us could sway them, eventually.

Thanks again,
-Chris

On 4/23/2015 5:03 PM, Robert Bruninga via EV wrote:

Earlier today, I  got an email from Toyota promoting their Fool Cell
vehicle (with no reply address).

So I went to the Toyota web site and found the CONTACT link and filled out
an on-line email telling them to stop throwing good money after bad in
last years ideas (Fool cells) and to come out with a competitive Toyota
BEV...

IN less than 3 hours, I got a response:

We are sorry to hear of your concerns with Toyota's positioning of the
fuel cell vehicle. We respect your opinions regarding both
battery-electric vehicles and the FCV, and have documented your comments
at our National Headquarters, where they remain available for review from
the appropriate departments. It is through feedback such as yours we are
able to monitor and improve upon the quality of our products and
services.

If they are actively sending out a broad reach advertising campaign for
their FCV, then they are also obviously open to feedback!

Bob, WB4APR
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)




___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-23 Thread Peri Hartman via EV
I'm not so sure FCVs are an ally to EVs.  Whether FCVs go away on their 
own or not, to build the infrastructure will cost billions and then 
billions more of subsidies to generate hydrogen at a competitive price.  
Once that infrastructure exists, it is a beast, not an ally.


Peri

-- Original Message --
From: Jorg Brown via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
To: Robert Bruninga bruni...@usna.edu; Electric Vehicle Discussion 
List ev@lists.evdl.org

Sent: 23-Apr-15 9:11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell 
vehicle


Surely, rather than fighting _against_ FCVs, we should be fighting 
_with_

them, against our common enemy the internal combustion engine?

https://youtu.be/kHHitXxH-us?t=44s

(I'm not a big fan of FCVs, but it seems to me they will go away on 
their
own; we don't need to hasten their demise, other than perhaps to get 
states

like California to stop spending our taxes on them.)

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Robert Bruninga via EV 
ev@lists.evdl.org

wrote:


 Earlier today, I  got an email from Toyota promoting their Fool Cell
 vehicle (with no reply address).

 So I went to the Toyota web site and found the CONTACT link and 
filled out
 an on-line email telling them to stop throwing good money after bad 
in
 last years ideas (Fool cells) and to come out with a competitive 
Toyota

 BEV...

 IN less than 3 hours, I got a response:

 We are sorry to hear of your concerns with Toyota's positioning of 
the

 fuel cell vehicle. We respect your opinions regarding both
 battery-electric vehicles and the FCV, and have documented your 
comments
 at our National Headquarters, where they remain available for review 
from
 the appropriate departments. It is through feedback such as yours we 
are

 able to monitor and improve upon the quality of our products and
 services.

 If they are actively sending out a broad reach advertising campaign 
for

 their FCV, then they are also obviously open to feedback!

 Bob, WB4APR
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
 http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
 For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150423/3205398c/attachment.htm

___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)





___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle

2015-04-23 Thread Lee Hart via EV

Peri Hartman via EV wrote:

I'm not so sure FCVs are an ally to EVs. Whether FCVs go away on their
own or not, to build the infrastructure will cost billions and then
billions more of subsidies to generate hydrogen at a competitive price.
Once that infrastructure exists, it is a beast, not an ally.


I agree. In 2000, fuel cell vehicles were loudly promoted as the way to 
*replace* battery electric vehicles. The auto and oil industry used them 
to suck all the funding *away* from battery research and development.


In fact, every time EVs begin to get serious press, and rising numbers 
of EVs manage to get out on the roads, fuel cells get trotted out 
*again* as a replacement. We don't need EVs; why, in just a few more 
years, we'll have fuel cell vehicles perfected!


--
If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it
yourself. -- Albert Einstein
--
Lee Hart, 814 8th Ave N, Sartell MN 56377, www.sunrise-ev.com
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)