Re: [Evolution-hackers] Issues during building evolution from source
Hi, you may also want to look into running apt-get build-dep to get hold of all dependencies. Best, Tobi On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 10:38 +0100, Paweł @ Bogdan wrote: > Hello. > I'm trying to build evolution from sources. I'm running Ubuntu 20.04 > on WSL 2. > I installed slapd and ldap-utils (I found such packages on the > Internet), but during calling cmake on the evolution-data-server I am > obtaining that > > At least 2.0 OpenLDAP version required. > > Any hints? > Please help. > > Best regards > Paweł Bogdan > > Pobierz aplikację Outlook dla systemu Android > ___ > evolution-hackers mailing list > evolution-hackers@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PGP] decrypt into local folder
Hi, On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 12:25 +0200, J T via evolution-hackers wrote: > I encrypt almost all my emails with PGP. This has several significant > drawbacks: > 1. Since I generate new private key every year, I need to keep track > of all of them to be able to decrypt and look at my old emails. yeah, this is a general problem. General in the sense that MUAs are particularly bad about maintaining OpenPGP state. But you can't blame them, really, because GnuPG wants to maintain state and puts itself in an awkward position. Anyway, some MUAs (well, I know only one) store the session keys in a database, s.t. you don't need the private keys anymore. Evolution could do that, too, along with storing the plaintext of some encrypted information (which, currently, is only the text of the body, but some proposals exist to also encrypt the subject and other headers). > I don't like this. I want to archive old keys only for emergency > purposes and have clean PGP keyring. Well. Another angle is to fix your OpenPGP implementation... Have you tried disabling your key? GnuPG supports that, but few people know. > I think it would be nice to have option or message-filter 'Decrypt > into (local) folder', where emails are kept decrypted. Why would you want to keep the encrypted version? Cheers, Tobi ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Support for Autocrypt?
Hi. On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 13:45 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > The > biggest problem is that the whole thing depends on the mail > applications, as both ends should use clients which understand the > feature, thus there's a problem with interoperability (at the moment) > and basically no use for it in corporate environments (read: with > Outlook users) Well. The spec has just been released, so I'm not surprised that the number of clients supporting autocrypt is not at its peak just yet. How feasible is it, though, to implement this as a plugin to Evolution? AFAIU it would need to be able to get the context in terms of what headers the currently replied-to email has. If it is possible indeed, then I could imagine this to be an extended internship with the GNOME community. Cheers, Tobi ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Account autoconfiguration/autodiscover
Hi! On Mi, 2016-02-24 at 11:58 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > it's not a large change, but not a tiny too. Hm. GSoC is 12 weeks or so. And the intern would probably be completely unaware of Evolution's codebase. Do you think that's feasible, still? > b) a better option would be to add a new Edit->Server Accounts (the > wording is awful, I know), where you fill only User name and E- > Mail > (or server domain, if not email), and then the wizard will check > what that domain offers based on the SVR records, well-known HTTPs > entry points and so on and offers to add all sources it'll find > for the user, thus you gen not only Mail, but also Contacts, > Calendar, Memos and Tasks, if the server supports it. Furthermore, > users will be able to manage which sources should be visible in > the UI (offered to other evolution-data-server clients) here, not > like it is done currently, where you get all or nothing. hm. sounds complicated indeed. How about a separate tool that will then set up your evolution accounts..? Could anybody mentor such a project at all? Cheers, Tobi ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Account autoconfiguration/autodiscover
Hi! On Mi, 2016-02-24 at 10:20 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > the current Evolution (also the development version 3.19.90) doesn't > support any kind of this autodiscover thing for mail accounts. Do you think it would be something for the upcoming Summer of Code or Outreachy rounds? Cheers, Tobi ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Reconsidering our release cycle
Hi. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 07:21:46AM -0400, Paul Smith wrote: On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 10:58 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: And if a distribution ships a few weeks before a release, that now means they can be shipping a version of Evolution which is a *year* old, instead of only six months old. I agree with David. My main frustration with Evo right now is that I'm always a release behind because my distribution appears to be chronically one Gnome release back (I understand this is due to my distribution and not the responsibility of the developers), for whatever reason. That means I was stuck on 3.4 until May (which was bad as there were numerous problems with 3.4), and will be using 3.6 for most of the rest of the year. Hm. I'm wondering whether this is a problem for the rest of GNOME, too. Do the arguments brought up in this thread apply to Evolution (and friends) only? If no: Would the rest of GNOME also benefit from a different release schedule? If yes: Why would that be? The arguments on favour of a longer cycle seem to be very generic to me. Cheers, Tobi ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] mail address validation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey :-)
On 21.01.2010 19:17, Roberto -MadBob- Guido wrote:
In the first version of the patch
( http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=146701 ) I've
provided a routine built on regular expressions (regcomp() and
regexec()). Opinions about that?
Thanks for you contribution. However, it is way too strict.
It misses all the interesting characters that are allowed in the local
part, i.e.:
! $ * - = ^ ` | ~ # % ' + / ? _ { }
RFC 5322 (4.3.1) says the local part is a dot-atom, 3.2.3 says a
dot-atom is a atext which includes alphanumeric plus the characters
mentioned above.
I'd be delighted to see an implementation that parses all corner cases,
i.e. foo/bar=...@example.com or !foo%bar?baz*...@example.com, correctly.
That might be a challenging Summer of Code assignment ;-)
Happy Hacking ;-)
Tobi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAktYsaMACgkQPuBX/6ogjZ6xBQCgrkvs7pKQ6SKARF2ja20Wt0Bk
pb4AoISpqLFf27yDVaiS3aAIJt8tMQqM
=0XVy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] mail address validation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 21.01.2010 19:57, Tobias Mueller wrote: I'd be delighted to see an implementation that parses all corner cases, i.e. foo/bar=...@example.com or !foo%bar?baz*...@example.com, correctly. That might be a challenging Summer of Code assignment ;-) Just found this obviously correct RegEx in http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/MAURICE/Email-Valid-0.15/Valid.pm: $RFC822PAT = 'EOF'; [\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\ xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xf f\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*(?:(?:[^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\x ff]+(?![^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff])|[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015 ]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015]*)*)[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\ xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80 - -\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]* )*(?:\.[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\ \\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\ x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*(?:[^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x8 0-\xff]+(?![^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff])|[^\\\x80-\xff\n \015]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015]*)*)[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x 80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^ \x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040 \t]*)*)*...@[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([ ^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\ \\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*(?:[^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\ x80-\xff]+(?![^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff])|\[(?:[^\\\x80- \xff\n\015\[\]]|\\[^\x80-\xff])*\])[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015() ]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\ x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*(?:\.[\04 0\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\ n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\ 015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*(?:[^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff]+(?! [^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff])|\[(?:[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015\[\ ]]|\\[^\x80-\xff])*\])[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\ x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\01 5()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*)*|(?:[^(\040)@,;:. \\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff]+(?![^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff] )|[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015]*)*)[^ ()@,;:.\\\[\]\x80-\xff\000-\010\012-\037]*(?:(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\0 15()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][ ^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)|[^\\\x80-\xff\ n\015]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015]*)*)[^()@,;:.\\\[\]\ x80-\xff\000-\010\012-\037]*)*[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(? :(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80- \xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*(?:@[\040\t]* (?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015 ()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015() ]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*(?:[^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff]+(?![^(\0 40)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff])|\[(?:[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015\[\]]|\\ [^\x80-\xff])*\])[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\ xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]* )*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*(?:\.[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80 - -\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x 80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t ]*)*(?:[^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff]+(?![^(\040)@,;:.\\ \[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff])|\[(?:[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015\[\]]|\\[^\x80-\xff]) *\])[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x 80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80 - -\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*)*(?:,[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015( )]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\ \x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*...@[\040\t ]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\0 15()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015 ()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*(?:[^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff]+(?![^( \040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff])|\[(?:[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015\[\]]| \\[^\x80-\xff])*\])[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80 - -\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^\x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015() ]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040\t]*)*(?:\.[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x 80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:\\[^ \x80-\xff][^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\))[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*)*\)[\040 \t]*)*(?:[^(\040)@,;:.\\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff]+(?![^(\040)@,;:. \\\[\]\000-\037\x80-\xff])|\[(?:[^\\\x80-\xff\n\015\[\]]|\\[^\x80-\xff ])*\])[\040\t]*(?:\([^\\\x80-\xff\n\015()]*(?:(?:\\[^\x80-\xff]|\([^\\ \x80-\xff\n
Re: [Evolution-hackers] stacktraces, debug: How to link evolution with debug version of glib, gtk on ubuntu karmic
Heya :) On 24.12.2009 20:43, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote: I try to get glib debug information for the glib libraries in backtraces on ubuntu karmic. Even though I installed the debug packages, gdb does not pick up the non-stripped library: Sounds like a bug to me. How do you know it doesn't pick the debug symbols up though? Do I have to build glib myself and install it in the same prefix as evolution? Doesn't really matter where you install it, as long as the non-stripped binaries get pulled. Thus, you need to tell the linker to use the new library, i.e. with LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_PRELOAD. HTH, Tobi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Core dumps from Evolution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heya :-)
On 15.10.2009 16:57, Paul Smith wrote:
I'm seeing pretty common core dumps, all of which have the same
signature:
#0 0x7f49a9ddab0a in __xmlParserInputBufferCreateFilename
(URI=0x7f4994045710
/home/psmith/.evolution/mail/config/et-expanded-imap:__paul+mad-scientist...@localhost:40993_INBOX,
enc=XML_CHAR_ENCODING_NONE) at ../../libxml2/xmlIO.c:2521
2521if (((z_stream *)context)-avail_in 4) {
I've had that a couple of month ago and the problem was a 64bit issue. I
don't know remember what exactly the issue was. Something with zlib and
libxml not building wide enough filepointers or so. Anyway, adding
module_autogenargs['libxml2'] = autogenargs + '
CFLAGS=-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE'
to my ~/.jhbuildrc fixed that for me.
HTH,
Tobi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkraAgIACgkQPuBX/6ogjZ4OagCePFVft1jkNGidWH8eEvioRJJF
O/AAoIQN7XqtnVUkxx+r4xg8KaL7rkoi
=w54e
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Changes from 2.26 to 2.28
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey Rohan :) Thanks for your critics :) On 04.10.2009 02:47, Rohan Agrawal wrote: * In the panel that lists the mails, each mail is given a much wider space, which seems like a waste. GNOME already consumes a lot of screen space with very big controls and text, when compared to Windows or to KDE. Could you make a screenshot and file a bug at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/? * The Date column now shows 24-hour times rather than 12 hour times, and there doesn't seem to be a way to change it. Hm. It should respect your LC_TIME environment variable. * The Date column now uses n days ago for mails within the last week, rather than the day of the week. My impression is that Sunday is more understandable than 6 days ago. If there is no (obvious) setting for this, I'd file a bug :-) Thanks and Cheers, Tobi -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrIaUgACgkQPuBX/6ogjZ6zYgCeLp8rqwwDrAYJXD9SYiIoabAr GlgAn3+uPk0ljU1DlKzfJ8NiYEaezoSX =VMUj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] unable to build from trunc: changes only found in git repository
Hey :) Holger Goetz wrote: can someone confirm that latest changes only get included to the new git repository and no longer find their way into svn? confirmed. AFAIK, the SVN is read only. No problem to use git instead of svn when compiling from trunc - but it seems that the git repository doesn't contain all pieces (e.g. autogen.sh, README, AUTHORS etc. for evolution)... ACK. This is a known problem being worked on. Is there any known time line when git will become the current revision control system? Yes, it was a couple of days ago ;-) Cheers, Tobi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Cannot run evolution built using jhbuild
Hi, On 07.01.2009 22:20, Stefano Canepa wrote: 2) what's going wrong the evolution built by jhbuild? The build itself works properly, right? Running your newly build Evolution fails, if I read your log correctly. To run evolution, you should do a jhbuild run evolution. It is not clear to me, what evolution-cvs is or does. Also, you should do an export LANG=C to reset the language before you post any logs, because reading messages in your language might be difficult for somebody ;-) What I can guess from the error messages is, that you run an old gconfd on your host system and don't run the new, dbus-ified GConfD from jhbuild. Try to run the gconf deamon from your jhbuild prefix. i.e. jhbuild run /opt/gnome/libexec/gconfd-2 before you run your evolution-trunk. Happy Hacking, Muelli ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Can't build Evolution-Data-Server due to undefined reference to `e_proxy_require_proxy_for_uri'
Bonjour :) On 09.06.2008 20:10 Muelli wrote: I have troubles building e-d-s: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-pointer-sign -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed -o .libs/soap-test soap-test.o -pthread -Wl,-R/usr/lib/nspr ../../libedataserver/.libs/libedataserver-1.2.so -L/opt/gnome2/lib -L/usr/lib/nspr ./.libs/libegroupwise-1.2.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libbonobo-2.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libbonobo-activation.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libsoup-2.4.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libxml2.so -lm /opt/gnome2/lib/libgnutls.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libtasn1.so -lz /opt/gnome2/lib/libgcrypt.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libgpg-error.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libgio-2.0.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libgconf-2.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libORBit-2.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libgthread-2.0.so -lrt /opt/gnome2/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so -lnsl /opt/gnome2/lib/libdbus-1.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /opt/gnome2/lib/libglib-2.0.so -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -ldl -lpthread -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/opt/gnome2/lib ./.libs/libegroupwise-1.2.so: undefined reference to `e_proxy_require_proxy_for_uri' ./.libs/libegroupwise-1.2.so: undefined reference to `e_proxy_setup_proxy' ./.libs/libegroupwise-1.2.so: undefined reference to `e_proxy_new' ./.libs/libegroupwise-1.2.so: undefined reference to `e_proxy_peek_uri' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [soap-test] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/muelli/svn/gnome2/evolution-data-server/servers/groupwise' make[3]: *** [all] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/muelli/svn/gnome2/evolution-data-server/servers/groupwise' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/muelli/svn/gnome2/evolution-data-server/servers' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/muelli/svn/gnome2/evolution-data-server' make: *** [all] Error 2 *** error during stage build of evolution-data-server: ## Error running make *** [52/54] You might want to have a look at the full build log at http://rafb.net/p/Uwlhfj78.html Especially ./libedataserver/e-proxy.c seems to be built. As I notice that pastebin-link has vanished, I'll attach the build log here. I hope, somebody can enlighten me. Cheers, Tobi eds.txt.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] can't configure evolution as of rev 34033 due to ?
Hi folks,
I desperately try to build evolution but even the configure fails.
Please see the following transcript:
*** Checking out evolution *** [1/1]
svn update .
Uhelp/es/es.po
Updated to revision 34033.
*** Configuring evolution *** [1/1]
./autogen.sh --prefix /opt/gnome2 --libdir '${exec_prefix}/lib64'
--disable-static --disable-scrollkeeper --disable-gtk-doc --with-openldap=yes
--enable-nntp=yes --enable-ipv6=yes --enable-test-component=yes
--enable-nss=yes --enable-smime=yes --enable-plugins=all
/opt/gnome2/bin/gnome-autogen.sh
checking for autoconf = 2.53...
testing autoconf2.50... not found.
testing autoconf... found 2.60
checking for automake = 1.6...
testing automake-1.10... found 1.10
checking for libtool = 1.4.3...
testing libtoolize... found 1.5.22
checking for glib-gettext = 2.2.0...
testing glib-gettextize... /opt/gnome2/bin/glib-gettextize: line 74: echo:
write error: Broken pipe
/opt/gnome2/bin/glib-gettextize: line 75: echo: write error: Broken pipe
found 2.14.1
checking for intltool = 0.25...
testing intltoolize... found 0.36.1
checking for pkg-config = 0.14.0...
testing pkg-config... found 0.21
checking for gnome-doc-utils = 0.4.2...
testing gnome-doc-prepare... found 0.11.1
Checking for required M4 macros...
Checking for forbidden M4 macros...
Processing ./configure.in
Running libtoolize...
Running glib-gettextize... Ignore non-fatal messages.
Copying file mkinstalldirs
Copying file po/Makefile.in.in
Please add the files
codeset.m4 gettext.m4 glibc21.m4 iconv.m4 isc-posix.m4 lcmessage.m4
progtest.m4
from the /aclocal directory to your autoconf macro directory
or directly to your aclocal.m4 file.
You will also need config.guess and config.sub, which you can get from
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/config/.
Running intltoolize...
Running gnome-doc-prepare...
You should update your 'aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
Running aclocal-1.10...
/opt/gnome2/share/aclocal/audiofile.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition of
AM_PATH_AUDIOFILE
/opt/gnome2/share/aclocal/audiofile.m4:12: run info '(automake)Extending
aclocal'
/opt/gnome2/share/aclocal/audiofile.m4:12: or see
http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal
configure.in:102: warning: AC_ARG_PROGRAM invoked multiple times
Running autoconf...
configure.in:102: warning: AC_ARG_PROGRAM invoked multiple times
Running autoheader...
configure.in:102: warning: AC_ARG_PROGRAM invoked multiple times
Running automake-1.10...
configure.in:102: warning: AC_ARG_PROGRAM invoked multiple times
data/Makefile.am:4: `%'-style pattern rules are a GNU make extension
data/Makefile.am:12: `%'-style pattern rules are a GNU make extension
gnome-doc-utils.make:63: HAVE_GNOME_DOC_UTILS does not appear in
AM_CONDITIONAL
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:133: ENABLE_SK does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:182: ENABLE_SK does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:74: if $(DOC_H_FILE: non-POSIX variable name
gnome-doc-utils.make:74: (probably a GNU make extension)
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:77: if $(DOC_H_FILE: non-POSIX variable name
gnome-doc-utils.make:77: (probably a GNU make extension)
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:110: if $(DOC_USER_FORMATS: non-POSIX variable name
gnome-doc-utils.make:110: (probably a GNU make extension)
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:115: if $(filter environment,$(origin LINGUAS: non-POSIX
variable name
gnome-doc-utils.make:115: (probably a GNU make extension)
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:115: filter $(LINGUAS: non-POSIX variable name
gnome-doc-utils.make:115: (probably a GNU make extension)
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:144: shell xmllint --format $(2: non-POSIX variable name
gnome-doc-utils.make:144: (probably a GNU make extension)
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:144: notdir $(patsubst %/$(notdir $(2: non-POSIX
variable name
gnome-doc-utils.make:144: (probably a GNU make extension)
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:144: if $(_ENABLE_SK: non-POSIX variable name
gnome-doc-utils.make:144: (probably a GNU make extension)
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:160: if $(DOC_MODULE: non-POSIX variable name
gnome-doc-utils.make:160: (probably a GNU make extension)
help/Makefile.am:3: `gnome-doc-utils.make' included from here
gnome-doc-utils.make:160: wildcard
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.11.6(.1), Evolution-Data-Server 1.11.6(.1), GtkHTML 3.15.6 and Evolution-Exchange 2.11.6(.1) released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 08.08.2007 19:15, William John Murray wrote: Thanks Matthew - except that on F7 there seems to be a packaging problem. If I yum update evolution --enablerepo=development (and add evolution-exchange via rpm) I get: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_impl errors on starting evolution. I ran into a similar issue as well. This is due to a new glib [1], which you probably don't have installed. So try to install a very recent glib. Cheers, Tobi [1] http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/glib/trunk/glib/gthread.h?view=diffr1=5615r2=5616 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGul0+PuBX/6ogjZ4RAgvxAJ9YNyFq8beFlLq4HOGhEw4nM5DNXACeMft1 lVCllDup2jLj/c5yYGjZTpY= =ars0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Error dialogs in evolution data server plugin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi :) On 20.06.2007 06:53, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: I don't think you can do a error display from EDS. Just see how the e-cal errors/failures work. They return a code to the clients (Evolution) and Evolution displays a error using e-error. This is, how things actually /should/ work, I guess. But look at libedataserverui/e-passwords.c, there the e-d-s displays password entry dialogs. That raises a question in my mind: Is that (e-d-s is the user interface) desired behaviour, or should we care to move this kind of functionality off the e-d-s into the clients, say, Evo? Regards, Tobi -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGg/RIPuBX/6ogjZ4RAtxHAKCSSKdCeRbMp3ZNCYD6cinKRxaRRQCeKLFB Prs4IsYv2HeX/9iVtdMx4yE= =UVmg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Simple Question to ChangeLog
Hi Evolution Hackers :) Please let me introduce myself. I am Tobias Mueller, from Hamburg, Germany and I want to hack on Evolution. I am a SoC student and I want to improve Evolutions behaviour in displaying threaded emails. I am digging through the code and try to understand, how things work. I tried to build evolution from SVN as well, but I ran into some problems. The critical ones are already fixed :) So now I can compile Evolution even with automake 1.6 ;-) But the test-component doesn't seem to work as described in #444289 [1]. I am about to commit this patch which is accepted-commit_now. But I am not quite sure about this ChangeLog thing. I am supposed to update the ChangeLog, but I don't know exactly how. HACKING[2] states: It must include ChangeLog entries in the appropriate ChangeLog for the file modified. Use emacs, C-4-a will start a properly formatted ChangeLog entry in the correct ChangeLog file automatically. But I am not used to Emacs and my Emacs doesn't do that anyway :( So I just can guess that a correct ChangeLog entry looks like: 2007-06-17 Tobias Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fixes #444289 * shell/evolution-test-component.c: Removed createdControls stuff But since this is a rather trivial change, a ChangeLog might not even be necessesary. There are revision even without a ChangeLog update. See [3] for example. So should I alter ChangeLog, and if, in the proposed way? And does a strict ChangeLog policy exists? http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/arch.shtml helped me a bit to understand evos source code, but I am far away from understanding it though. I am completly new to glib, Corba and stuff, thus I have to read a lot. Anyway I found a typo there: it says: ,,The corba piece is asyncrhonous'' which I propose should be ,,asynchronous''. And on b.g.o [4] I found that the link under Product Info labeled with GNOME SVN points to http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/Evolution/trunk which does not exists (note the capital e in Evolution). But guenter already told me, that this might not be easy to fix. I appreciate any further documentation on Evos internals and the way things work :) Cheers, Tobi [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444289 [2] http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/evolution/trunk/HACKING?view=markup [3] http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/evolution?view=revisionrevision=30057 [4] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=Evolution signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
