RE: Anti-Spam
Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I am already running Group Shield. Is it feasible to run mail essential as well? -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dcpromo on existing server
Anyone know how to configure exchange 5.5. sp3, on w2k to dial an isp via a newly installed isdn Terminal adapter ? I think i need to do somehing so theres an entry in the adress book, but what about the connections thing ? any help advice gratefully recieved. TIA Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam
Soysal Rest assured that Richard Cranium in accounting will subscribe to the cooking channel mailing list, or Jenny the Office Manager will forward the Good Luck Totem to everybody in her address book. At that point Richard and Jenny will complain even louder when they receive spam because the content filter that YOU put in place doesn't work. Then Johnny the PHB will tell you to increase the effectiveness of your content filter or lose your job. You'll do it and Richard and Jenny will complain to Johnny that they are not receiving business critical e-mails. Then Johnny will order you to go through all blocked messages and forward anything that is business critical. Soon, you'll discover that you can't do anything else but review the quarantined messages. You'll advise Johnny the PHB to promote Avi the OfficeBoy to Information Delivery Specialist position where he can go through all the messages so you can go back to installing service packs. Should I go on? /Soysal -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS Maintenance
Default settings are usually ok, but the main consideration is to ensure that your backup schedule does not conflict with the IS maintenance schedule. Neil -Original Message- From: Chad Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 15 January 2002 17:19 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: IS Maintenance Subject: IS Maintenance What is the best practice for IS maintenance?? Do you have it run everyday, twice a week? Also do you switch the view to 15 minute and just add a block to the time you want IS maintenace to start?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam
I know paul, but question is can I run mail essential on the server running group shield. Is there any performance related issues etc. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I am already running Group Shield. Is it feasible to run mail essential as well? -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam
Don't forget that MailSweeper provides anti-virus capabilities as well as content checking, so one option is to get rid of GroupShield and just use MailSweeper (or Mail Essentials, or even the new Trend offering if you like integrated AV engines...) Neil -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 January 2002 09:24 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Anti-Spam Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I know paul, but question is can I run mail essential on the server running group shield. Is there any performance related issues etc. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I am already running Group Shield. Is it feasible to run mail essential as well? -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troublesome IMS
Hello all, Our Exchange server is suffering from a problem where a mail gets delivered, but the mail sticks in the IMS's 'Outbound mail awaiting delivery' queue with '(host unreachable)' next to it. This results in the IMS retrying to redeliver the mail at the set intervals and the somewhat annoyed recipient receiving multiple copies of the mail until it expires. This only happens occasionally - most mail goes out fine. I have noticed that is does happen to one email that gets sent regularly from one of our users to an external mailbox. I have tried using nslookup from the server and can telnet in to port 25 of the other servers without a problem. Our box is set up as follows: NT4, Sp6a, PIII, 3 processors, 1gb mem. Exchange 5.5 sp4 (configured as per Q181420 - 'How to Configure Exchange or other SMTP with Proxy Server') Network Associates GroupShield (Antivirus Server Extension: 4.5.572.171 Server Admin Extension: 4.5.572.128) Network Associates Netshield 4.5.0 (with the recommended Exchange directories excluded from scanning). I also had the Network Associates Message Body Scanning tool installed but thought this might have been contributing to the problem so I removed it a few months ago, but the problem sill continues. Any ideas? Many thanks, Daniel. This e-mail may contain proprietary and confidential information, and is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not one of the named recipients, then disclosure, distribution, copying or printing of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and it must be deleted. Additionally you should notify the sender of the distribution error. Heal's will not accept any liability or responsibility for the completeness or accuracy of its contents and attachments. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem
Does the non-working Exchange server have a lmhost file with an old setting of sorts? I would check if that server can see the domain controller(s). Wins/DNS settings all ok and working? Sander -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes back telling me my credentials are wrong. Which is incorrect because it worked from the 2nd serverWhat a pain. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Normally? Are some not doing this? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem The server is in the same domain. So there is no trust relationship between them. Well, it works for users on the 2nd mail server that houses mailboxes. But it doesn't work for the first. Normally, we have users loggin in under the domain account profile. But for some reason it works for some and not others. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Is the other server in another domain? Is there a trust relationship between the two? If not, this is what I would expect to see on the client. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Problem All, I'm having a strange problem. We have 2 Exchange 5.5 servers that houses mailboxes. When users are logged into their local computer and they try to access their Outlook they get prompted for their credentials and once they put that in, it comes back with an error stating that the credentials are incorrect and try again. But on our other server that houses mailboxes it works just fine when
Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download?
I'd rather not put Outlook on a server, however I can't find the 32-bit Exchange Client for NT anywhere, Technet has plenty of updates but not the base installation. Can anyone provide a link, or a means of getting the file? Thanks in advance, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam
Irfan, you could run Mail Essentials and Groupshield together but you give no indication of the spec of your hardware so if I say yes and it all grinds to a halt, don't blame me! (Neil, have been using VScan 470 on Mimesweeper 4.2_6 and Groupshield, and Webshield and lucky rabbits feet and crossed fingers for god knows how long... I might just even install Trend for a bit of extra security, that'll be fun vbg) PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 09:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Don't forget that MailSweeper provides anti-virus capabilities as well as content checking, so one option is to get rid of GroupShield and just use MailSweeper (or Mail Essentials, or even the new Trend offering if you like integrated AV engines...) Neil -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 January 2002 09:24 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Anti-Spam Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I know paul, but question is can I run mail essential on the server running group shield. Is there any performance related issues etc. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I am already running Group Shield. Is it feasible to run mail essential as well? -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Troublesome IMS
Cisco PIX? No SMTP fixup -Original Message- From: Earl, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Troublesome IMS Hello all, Our Exchange server is suffering from a problem where a mail gets delivered, but the mail sticks in the IMS's 'Outbound mail awaiting delivery' queue with '(host unreachable)' next to it. This results in the IMS retrying to redeliver the mail at the set intervals and the somewhat annoyed recipient receiving multiple copies of the mail until it expires. This only happens occasionally - most mail goes out fine. I have noticed that is does happen to one email that gets sent regularly from one of our users to an external mailbox. I have tried using nslookup from the server and can telnet in to port 25 of the other servers without a problem. Our box is set up as follows: NT4, Sp6a, PIII, 3 processors, 1gb mem. Exchange 5.5 sp4 (configured as per Q181420 - 'How to Configure Exchange or other SMTP with Proxy Server') Network Associates GroupShield (Antivirus Server Extension: 4.5.572.171 Server Admin Extension: 4.5.572.128) Network Associates Netshield 4.5.0 (with the recommended Exchange directories excluded from scanning). I also had the Network Associates Message Body Scanning tool installed but thought this might have been contributing to the problem so I removed it a few months ago, but the problem sill continues. Any ideas? Many thanks, Daniel. This e-mail may contain proprietary and confidential information, and is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not one of the named recipients, then disclosure, distribution, copying or printing of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and it must be deleted. Additionally you should notify the sender of the distribution error. Heal's will not accept any liability or responsibility for the completeness or accuracy of its contents and attachments. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download?
look in the client directory on your Exchange Server CD. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? I'd rather not put Outlook on a server, however I can't find the 32-bit Exchange Client for NT anywhere, Technet has plenty of updates but not the base installation. Can anyone provide a link, or a means of getting the file? Thanks in advance, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Troublesome IMS
is this essential? i just checked our pix and smtp fixup is enabled - i'm not aware of any problems though... -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 12:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Troublesome IMS Cisco PIX? No SMTP fixup -Original Message- From: Earl, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Troublesome IMS Hello all, Our Exchange server is suffering from a problem where a mail gets delivered, but the mail sticks in the IMS's 'Outbound mail awaiting delivery' queue with '(host unreachable)' next to it. This results in the IMS retrying to redeliver the mail at the set intervals and the somewhat annoyed recipient receiving multiple copies of the mail until it expires. This only happens occasionally - most mail goes out fine. I have noticed that is does happen to one email that gets sent regularly from one of our users to an external mailbox. I have tried using nslookup from the server and can telnet in to port 25 of the other servers without a problem. Our box is set up as follows: NT4, Sp6a, PIII, 3 processors, 1gb mem. Exchange 5.5 sp4 (configured as per Q181420 - 'How to Configure Exchange or other SMTP with Proxy Server') Network Associates GroupShield (Antivirus Server Extension: 4.5.572.171 Server Admin Extension: 4.5.572.128) Network Associates Netshield 4.5.0 (with the recommended Exchange directories excluded from scanning). I also had the Network Associates Message Body Scanning tool installed but thought this might have been contributing to the problem so I removed it a few months ago, but the problem sill continues. Any ideas? Many thanks, Daniel. This e-mail may contain proprietary and confidential information, and is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not one of the named recipients, then disclosure, distribution, copying or printing of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and it must be deleted. Additionally you should notify the sender of the distribution error. Heal's will not accept any liability or responsibility for the completeness or accuracy of its contents and attachments. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Troublesome IMS
I'll have to defer to those that are running PIX.[1] A quick search through the archives will more then likely reveal that no fixup protocol smtp 25 is highly recommended. Additionally, a quick web search on no fixup protocol smtp 25 will reveal that use of the command is mixed. Some claim it is not needed others claim it is. Here is a quote from a poster on securepoint.com mailing list, This has been a problem forever. It has been fixed in some releases of the PIX firmware, but it has been broken in more releases than not. Just give up and turn off the smtp protocol fixup. no fixup protocol smtp 25 Better yet, I could suggest you do what we have done. Dump the Cisco PIX YMMV, -- Matthew Monteleone-Haught Information Technology E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wheaton USA Inc A member of the ALCAN group of companies MCSE [1]perfectly happy with my CheckPoint FW! -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Troublesome IMS is this essential? i just checked our pix and smtp fixup is enabled - i'm not aware of any problems though... -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 12:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Troublesome IMS Cisco PIX? No SMTP fixup -Original Message- From: Earl, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Troublesome IMS Hello all, Our Exchange server is suffering from a problem where a mail gets delivered, but the mail sticks in the IMS's 'Outbound mail awaiting delivery' queue with '(host unreachable)' next to it. This results in the IMS retrying to redeliver the mail at the set intervals and the somewhat annoyed recipient receiving multiple copies of the mail until it expires. This only happens occasionally - most mail goes out fine. I have noticed that is does happen to one email that gets sent regularly from one of our users to an external mailbox. I have tried using nslookup from the server and can telnet in to port 25 of the other servers without a problem. Our box is set up as follows: NT4, Sp6a, PIII, 3 processors, 1gb mem. Exchange 5.5 sp4 (configured as per Q181420 - 'How to Configure Exchange or other SMTP with Proxy Server') Network Associates GroupShield (Antivirus Server Extension: 4.5.572.171 Server Admin Extension: 4.5.572.128) Network Associates Netshield 4.5.0 (with the recommended Exchange directories excluded from scanning). I also had the Network Associates Message Body Scanning tool installed but thought this might have been contributing to the problem so I removed it a few months ago, but the problem sill continues. Any ideas? Many thanks, Daniel. This e-mail may contain proprietary and confidential information, and is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not one of the named recipients, then disclosure, distribution, copying or printing of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and it must be deleted. Additionally you should notify the sender of the distribution error. Heal's will not accept any liability or responsibility for the completeness or accuracy of its contents and attachments. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PAB Sync Tool
Yes, I did... Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PAB Sync Tool And you did this after you imported the PAB into your Contacts? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PAB Sync Tool Question, we had our user using the PAB Sync Tool when users personal distribution lists addresses need to be updated to the GAL. This was used when we had Outlook 98. This year we rolled out Outlook 2000 and the PAB Sync Tool no longer works. I found an Outlook feature in the contacts where you put your personal distribution lists in contacts and when you open the personal distribution list there is an update button. When you click the update button it gives you a few options to update the personal address book and remove any that could not be fixed. I ran this option and NOTHING happened. Is this Microsoft's joke to let users sit in front of the screen expecting something to happen to their distribution list or am I missing something here? If this feature doesn't work, does anyone know if there is a replacement for the PAB Sync Tool? Or...if it works will someone enlighten me? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook BUG question
I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PAB Sync Tool
It sounds as if something is corrupted... You dont need the PAB anymore do you? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PAB Sync Tool Yes, I did... Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PAB Sync Tool And you did this after you imported the PAB into your Contacts? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PAB Sync Tool Question, we had our user using the PAB Sync Tool when users personal distribution lists addresses need to be updated to the GAL. This was used when we had Outlook 98. This year we rolled out Outlook 2000 and the PAB Sync Tool no longer works. I found an Outlook feature in the contacts where you put your personal distribution lists in contacts and when you open the personal distribution list there is an update button. When you click the update button it gives you a few options to update the personal address book and remove any that could not be fixed. I ran this option and NOTHING happened. Is this Microsoft's joke to let users sit in front of the screen expecting something to happen to their distribution list or am I missing something here? If this feature doesn't work, does anyone know if there is a replacement for the PAB Sync Tool? Or...if it works will someone enlighten me? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam
Yeah, that's amazing. Anyway I got 1 Ghz Processor, with 1 GB of ram, with RAID 1 and RAID 5. Regards, -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Irfan, you could run Mail Essentials and Groupshield together but you give no indication of the spec of your hardware so if I say yes and it all grinds to a halt, don't blame me! (Neil, have been using VScan 470 on Mimesweeper 4.2_6 and Groupshield, and Webshield and lucky rabbits feet and crossed fingers for god knows how long... I might just even install Trend for a bit of extra security, that'll be fun vbg) PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 09:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Don't forget that MailSweeper provides anti-virus capabilities as well as content checking, so one option is to get rid of GroupShield and just use MailSweeper (or Mail Essentials, or even the new Trend offering if you like integrated AV engines...) Neil -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 January 2002 09:24 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Anti-Spam Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I know paul, but question is can I run mail essential on the server running group shield. Is there any performance related issues etc. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I am already running Group Shield. Is it feasible to run mail essential as well? -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our
RE: Outlook Web Access
Is anybody running Windows 2000, SP2, with Exchange 5.5 SP4, and implementing Outlook Web Access? We are trying to implement OWA, but we keep getting an error message that says Setup has detected that you are not running a set of Windows NT related fixes required for Outlook Web Access. The only thing that I could find in TechNet referred to NT 4.0 and said the cause of the problem is that you don't have service pack 3 or later installed. OWA must be thinking that the SP2 we are running is applying to an NT 4.0 system, when in fact, it is applying to a Windows 2000 system. Has anybody seen this before and been able to work around it? Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Permissioning between Forests
Dear E2K/AD gurus We will be implementing two forests in our company, which is at the moment split into two Exchange 5.5 Orgs. I need to establish if/how we can permission users in one forest to the mailbox folders of users in the other forest. I know that trusts can be set up between forests, but does this allow enough granularity for mailbox permissioning etc? Also, can someone confirm what tool we need to use to enable Inter forest directory replication? Many thanks Gill McAndrew ** This communication is confidential and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not that person you are not permitted to make use of the information and you are requested to notify mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately that you have received it and then destroy the copy in your possession. Commerzbank AG is regulated by the FSA for the conduct of investment business in the UK. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam
Ah, you got no problems then! -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Yeah, that's amazing. Anyway I got 1 Ghz Processor, with 1 GB of ram, with RAID 1 and RAID 5. Regards, -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Irfan, you could run Mail Essentials and Groupshield together but you give no indication of the spec of your hardware so if I say yes and it all grinds to a halt, don't blame me! (Neil, have been using VScan 470 on Mimesweeper 4.2_6 and Groupshield, and Webshield and lucky rabbits feet and crossed fingers for god knows how long... I might just even install Trend for a bit of extra security, that'll be fun vbg) PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 09:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Don't forget that MailSweeper provides anti-virus capabilities as well as content checking, so one option is to get rid of GroupShield and just use MailSweeper (or Mail Essentials, or even the new Trend offering if you like integrated AV engines...) Neil -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 January 2002 09:24 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Anti-Spam Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I know paul, but question is can I run mail essential on the server running group shield. Is there any performance related issues etc. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I am already running Group Shield. Is it feasible to run mail essential as well? -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are
RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download?
And it's not on my Nov 97 CD. I know we got it off the CD when we rolled out Exchange. Do you have any April 1997 CD? The PC and MAC Exchange 5.0 client is on there! -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? Don't have one (a Client directory). The CD is a Nov 98 MS Select Server CD. rgds Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 12:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? look in the client directory on your Exchange Server CD. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? I'd rather not put Outlook on a server, however I can't find the 32-bit Exchange Client for NT anywhere, Technet has plenty of updates but not the base installation. Can anyone provide a link, or a means of getting the file? Thanks in advance, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scripting mailbox attributes
I ll try thnx -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:13 AM Aan: Exchange Discussions Onderwerp: RE: scripting mailbox attributes Check www.cdolive.com (http://www.cdolive.com/address.htm) Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kiran, Murat Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scripting mailbox attributes Brothers and sisters, I am trying to find a solution to be able to automate to give Modify Admin Attributes permission to all mailbox users. How can i script it? LDAP based scr? Exchange 5.5 sp3 with outlook 98 sr2 gr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download?
There is also an April 98 cd. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? And it's not on my Nov 97 CD. I know we got it off the CD when we rolled out Exchange. Do you have any April 1997 CD? The PC and MAC Exchange 5.0 client is on there! -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? Don't have one (a Client directory). The CD is a Nov 98 MS Select Server CD. rgds Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 12:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? look in the client directory on your Exchange Server CD. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Client for NT Server - where to download? I'd rather not put Outlook on a server, however I can't find the 32-bit Exchange Client for NT anywhere, Technet has plenty of updates but not the base installation. Can anyone provide a link, or a means of getting the file? Thanks in advance, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ __ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
As much as I know you don't want to hear it: as far as I can figure, Microsoft's advice is spot-on... live with it or implement the auto-accept script! My understanding of the way Microsoft's resource booking works (without the script) is exactly the behavior you are seeing. Sue Mosher may have work arounds on her site-- www.slipstick.com, but I have a feeling that you're going to be stuck with it. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to find deleted or hidden PF?
Morning, There is one SMTP address I want to use for PF on Exchange 2000 (single site, single server) and is already in use. Now I traced it with the help of Find Exchange Recipients from All Address Lists and it points to PF named mf-erac 05731796. First part of the name is project code, but number part must be assigned by Exchange, maybe it's still somewhere in dumpster or? PF named mf-erac exists and I want this folder to have that SMTP address. How to find that folder, delete it and release SMTP address? Thank you, __ Jang Man Ixtlan Team _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PAB Sync Tool
I imported the personal address book to contacts however, I'm trying to see if there is a way to update personal distribution lists that are stored in your contacts to the GAL. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PAB Sync Tool It sounds as if something is corrupted... You dont need the PAB anymore do you? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PAB Sync Tool Yes, I did... Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PAB Sync Tool And you did this after you imported the PAB into your Contacts? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PAB Sync Tool Question, we had our user using the PAB Sync Tool when users personal distribution lists addresses need to be updated to the GAL. This was used when we had Outlook 98. This year we rolled out Outlook 2000 and the PAB Sync Tool no longer works. I found an Outlook feature in the contacts where you put your personal distribution lists in contacts and when you open the personal distribution list there is an update button. When you click the update button it gives you a few options to update the personal address book and remove any that could not be fixed. I ran this option and NOTHING happened. Is this Microsoft's joke to let users sit in front of the screen expecting something to happen to their distribution list or am I missing something here? If this feature doesn't work, does anyone know if there is a replacement for the PAB Sync Tool? Or...if it works will someone enlighten me? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
Exchange Book
I just purchased Exchanger Server 5.5 Secrets by Robert Guaraldi. Anybody want to express their opinions on whether it is a good book or not. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Book
What do you think about it? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Book I just purchased Exchanger Server 5.5 Secrets by Robert Guaraldi. Anybody want to express their opinions on whether it is a good book or not. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clarify Service account understanding, please
Hope you guys can help with this query to checkout my chain of thought. Exchange 5.5 Organisation, multi-ste and multi-server. Current servers are located in a resource domain with a trust relationship to the user domain. The resource domain needs to be retired to consolidate domains, the service account is in the resource domain. I have new servers to move into the site and do an Ed C Server Move, but that would require the new servers to use the existing service account when they join the site. Therefore the only way to remove the resource domain and get over the service account problem would be to create a new site with a new service account. Am I right or have I missed something? Regards, Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Book
I've just skimmed over it, and it seems like a it would be helpful. I am just trying to see if was worth the buy, if not I can take it back and get something more worthy. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Book What do you think about it? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Book I just purchased Exchanger Server 5.5 Secrets by Robert Guaraldi. Anybody want to express their opinions on whether it is a good book or not. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Web Access
It has been discussed here. Check the archives. I'm also pretty sure that there is a Q-article on it, but I can't find it. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Is anybody running Windows 2000, SP2, with Exchange 5.5 SP4, and implementing Outlook Web Access? We are trying to implement OWA, but we keep getting an error message that says Setup has detected that you are not running a set of Windows NT related fixes required for Outlook Web Access. The only thing that I could find in TechNet referred to NT 4.0 and said the cause of the problem is that you don't have service pack 3 or later installed. OWA must be thinking that the SP2 we are running is applying to an NT 4.0 system, when in fact, it is applying to a Windows 2000 system. Has anybody seen this before and been able to work around it? Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.5.0 DNR
I am getting the message below back from an email server in Luxembourg after about 5 minutes. I am sending from Exchange 2000, SP2. I am able to communicate with this address from a hotmail account. Perhaps unrelated, but I noticed their website seems to be a Netscape server. Our internet mail connector sends ehlo does not send etrn/turn. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE KBHR 65 E. State Street, Suite 1800 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Test Sent: 1/16/2002 8:16 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Joe Schmoe' on 1/16/2002 8:21 AM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. aries.inside.kbhr.com #5.5.0 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clarify Service account understanding, please
You've missed something. :) You can have more than one account in the site which has service account admin privledges and you can also change the service account (http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxe.htm). Making the change isn't trivial, but it is possible. -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 1/16/2002 7:46 AM Subject: Clarify Service account understanding, please Hope you guys can help with this query to checkout my chain of thought. Exchange 5.5 Organisation, multi-ste and multi-server. Current servers are located in a resource domain with a trust relationship to the user domain. The resource domain needs to be retired to consolidate domains, the service account is in the resource domain. I have new servers to move into the site and do an Ed C Server Move, but that would require the new servers to use the existing service account when they join the site. Therefore the only way to remove the resource domain and get over the service account problem would be to create a new site with a new service account. Am I right or have I missed something? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: Backup
Okay friends one more, you have convinced me to stop brick backup and try Ed's Never Restore. Just a lil smaller question now. Has anybody experience on how much the database size will grow with the follwing facts: 23 Gig priv.edb 2 Gig pub.edb ~ 700 users mailbox limits set to deny sending at 65 megs no deny receiving planned retention time for deleted items 30 days I know it is hard to promise but I am looking forward to any good answers and Andy's answer *fg* - Steffen M. Steck FRIATEC Aktiengesellschaft Informationssysteme Organisation phone +49 621 486 -2206Steinzeugstrasse 50 fax +49 621 486 -252206 D-68229 Mannheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Germany - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really Off Topic
There are a set of tools for AD, one tool in the set allows you to force replication. Does anyone know what the name of this tool set id? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Really Off Topic
Repadmin.exe or via the AD Sites and Services IIRC. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Really Off Topic There are a set of tools for AD, one tool in the set allows you to force replication. Does anyone know what the name of this tool set id? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Really Off Topic
Some Win2k CD Support Tools ... REPADMIN.EXE: Replication Diagnostics Tool Checks replication consistency between replication partners, monitors replication status, displays replication metadata, forces replication events and knowledge consistency checker recalculation. REPLMON.EXE: Active Directory Replication Monitor Graphically displays replication topology, monitors replication status (including policies), forces replication events and knowledge consistency checker recalculation. Also ... NLTEST.EXE Provides a list of primary domain controllers, forces a shutdown, provides information about trusts and replication. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Really Off Topic There are a set of tools for AD, one tool in the set allows you to force replication. Does anyone know what the name of this tool set id? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Really Off Topic
Did you look in the windows 2000 support tools cd?? However If you go into AD site and services, drill down to the site you're at, then the server you're on. On the right, you should see the other servers in the site. If you right click on one of the servers on the right, replicate now should be an option. If you're looking to see what DCs, GCs and config server you're using, you can use dsadiag, which should be run from the exchsrvr\bin command. Option 1 will show you what is cached in DSaccess, option 2 will tell the server to look for changes in the network. Is that what you're looking for?? Hope this helps Russell -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Really Off Topic There are a set of tools for AD, one tool in the set allows you to force replication. Does anyone know what the name of this tool set id? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Book
One of the best Exchange 5.5 book is written by Paul Robichaux. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Callan, Chris Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Book I've just skimmed over it, and it seems like a it would be helpful. I am just trying to see if was worth the buy, if not I can take it back and get something more worthy. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Book What do you think about it? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Book I just purchased Exchanger Server 5.5 Secrets by Robert Guaraldi. Anybody want to express their opinions on whether it is a good book or not. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5.0 DNR
what happens when you do a manual SMTP session with their server? Q153119 -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Smoking Kills. If you're killed, you've lost a very important part of your life. - Brooke Shields, during an interview to become spokesperson for a federal anti-smoking campaign - -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5.0 DNR I am getting the message below back from an email server in Luxembourg after about 5 minutes. I am sending from Exchange 2000, SP2. I am able to communicate with this address from a hotmail account. Perhaps unrelated, but I noticed their website seems to be a Netscape server. Our internet mail connector sends ehlo does not send etrn/turn. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE KBHR 65 E. State Street, Suite 1800 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Test Sent: 1/16/2002 8:16 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Joe Schmoe' on 1/16/2002 8:21 AM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. aries.inside.kbhr.com #5.5.0 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Book
Yes, true. I have it here next to me now. The best and easiest to read exchange 5.5 book around. Look it up on Amazon. 'Managing Microsoft Exchange server' Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Book One of the best Exchange 5.5 book is written by Paul Robichaux. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Callan, Chris Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Book I've just skimmed over it, and it seems like a it would be helpful. I am just trying to see if was worth the buy, if not I can take it back and get something more worthy. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Book What do you think about it? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Book I just purchased Exchanger Server 5.5 Secrets by Robert Guaraldi. Anybody want to express their opinions on whether it is a good book or not. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Web Access
It's a Select disk - from memory you need to copy the files to the server, rename srvmin or srvmax to setup and then run it. Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access It has been discussed here. Check the archives. I'm also pretty sure that there is a Q-article on it, but I can't find it. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Is anybody running Windows 2000, SP2, with Exchange 5.5 SP4, and implementing Outlook Web Access? We are trying to implement OWA, but we keep getting an error message that says Setup has detected that you are not running a set of Windows NT related fixes required for Outlook Web Access. The only thing that I could find in TechNet referred to NT 4.0 and said the cause of the problem is that you don't have service pack 3 or later installed. OWA must be thinking that the SP2 we are running is applying to an NT 4.0 system, when in fact, it is applying to a Windows 2000 system. Has anybody seen this before and been able to work around it? Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving Calander Info
I have some Outlook 2000 clients that were sending/sharing calander info via email msgs. Their clients were setup as Internet Mail accounts. Since we activated Exchange 2000 when they now send their calander msgs. the accept button does not appear. I think it is the message format that disallows this?? It works fine if they use OWA. Second thing is I noticed you can not copy calender info from a personal folder to the Exchange folder. So is import export the way to go? _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup
There are too many unknowns - how much whitespace do you have now, single-instance ratio, actual use of the mailboxes (just because the users have 65MB limit, doesn't actually mean they will use it all - believe me!!), how much data they receive a day, etc., etc., etc. Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Steck, Steffen M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: Backup Okay friends one more, you have convinced me to stop brick backup and try Ed's Never Restore. Just a lil smaller question now. Has anybody experience on how much the database size will grow with the follwing facts: 23 Gig priv.edb 2 Gig pub.edb ~ 700 users mailbox limits set to deny sending at 65 megs no deny receiving planned retention time for deleted items 30 days I know it is hard to promise but I am looking forward to any good answers and Andy's answer *fg* - Steffen M. Steck FRIATEC Aktiengesellschaft Informationssysteme Organisation phone +49 621 486 -2206Steinzeugstrasse 50 fax +49 621 486 -252206 D-68229 Mannheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Germany - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Web Access
We have a winner... That's it exactly. You have to rename the files to Setup.exe -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access It's a Select disk - from memory you need to copy the files to the server, rename srvmin or srvmax to setup and then run it. Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access It has been discussed here. Check the archives. I'm also pretty sure that there is a Q-article on it, but I can't find it. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Is anybody running Windows 2000, SP2, with Exchange 5.5 SP4, and implementing Outlook Web Access? We are trying to implement OWA, but we keep getting an error message that says Setup has detected that you are not running a set of Windows NT related fixes required for Outlook Web Access. The only thing that I could find in TechNet referred to NT 4.0 and said the cause of the problem is that you don't have service pack 3 or later installed. OWA must be thinking that the SP2 we are running is applying to an NT 4.0 system, when in fact, it is applying to a Windows 2000 system. Has anybody seen this before and been able to work around it? Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA E2k slowdowns
Exchange is the only thing running on the box, and remember it worked fine until mid-nov. PSS etc has been working on this since mid-nov and hasn't been able to even come up with an idea why it's happening, let alone a fix. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA E2k slowdowns The plot thickens. Is OWA the only web app running. Maybe deleting all the sample stuff might help, but thatt should matter. Did I read correctly you called MS PSS. What did they say? Done it. Native 2k account has same problem. MAPI does not have any problems, only OWA. The delay is from the console of the server as well as remote sites. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA E2k slowdowns Try setting up an account on the W2K server with email and access it with OWA to see if that is your issue. Also try it from the same IP network and from a network that is niot native to see if it is a routing problem. Just my 2 cents worth. This is over frame relay. I don't believe we are having any resource issues. This is an 8processor 8GB ram box. We generally only use 2-4% of the processors, and less than 2GB of ram. o crucial details I left out. The OWA users are authenticating using NT4.0 domain accounts, not Win2k. There is a two way trust in place between the AD and the NT domain. The NT4.0 domain has more than enough BDC's to process the requests. There are 3 DC's in the AD, none of which are overloaded at the time of the slowdown. Front end servers create extra log ins (when OWA passes you to another server, you must re-enter your credentials). The users don't tolerate this very well. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA E2k slowdowns Is this issue on the internal network or access from modem users. With that many users though are you using frontend/back config to free up resources? ex2ksp2, two servers, in ex5.5 site with 4 5.5 servers Reader's digest version: October - completed migration of 5000 users to Ex2k on sp2. Users using OWA (extremely low end users) with no apparent issues. Mid-November-ish - ServerB started getting IS terminating unexpectedly, which resolved itself (i.e. dissapeared) in about 9 days. After IS stopped terminating unexpectedly, OWA having slowdowns (ie. takes 30-200 seconds to open the page). Other e2k server (serverA) with very few users not having the problem. Moved all the users to that server, it started having the problem. Rebuilt serverB completely (OS and all), started moving users to it - fine for a couple days, then started having slowdowns again. So, to date: NetMon - looks fine, no help Packet sniffer - network is fine (on fiber) Perf/SysMon - looks fine, no help Rebuild server from scratch - didn't help Remove all 3rd party software (or just don't load it) - didn't help help? p.s. Yes I've called MS. Ali Wilkes Borders Group, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Re: 5.5.0 DNR
I would try a manual send and if that also failed contact that domain's postmaster. - Original Message - From: Hooks, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:49 AM Subject: 5.5.0 DNR I am getting the message below back from an email server in Luxembourg after about 5 minutes. I am sending from Exchange 2000, SP2. I am able to communicate with this address from a hotmail account. Perhaps unrelated, but I noticed their website seems to be a Netscape server. Our internet mail connector sends ehlo does not send etrn/turn. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE KBHR 65 E. State Street, Suite 1800 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Test Sent: 1/16/2002 8:16 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Joe Schmoe' on 1/16/2002 8:21 AM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. aries.inside.kbhr.com #5.5.0 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OFF TOPIC - problems converting domain to AD
I've set up a lab to test our AD migration plan, but I've ran into a problem and was wondering if anyone out there knows the solution. Short version: How do you completely remove all information about a domain from AD if the DC for that domain is not available? Long version: I created an AD domain called ads.kimball.com which is the first domain in the forest. I then installed the ADC (but defined no CAs), did forestprep and domain prep. This all went smooth - just like in the whitepapers. I set up DNS on the ads.kimball.com to handle the ads.kimball.com zone. I cloned our production NT4 master user domain (4000 users) PDC and moved it to the lab. When I did the win2k upgrade on this server, the first reboot hung. However, I cycled power and the upgrade seemed to continue normally. The wizard came up that walked me through upgrading to AD. I installed the old NT4 domain (KII) as kii.kimball.com in the existing forest. I installed DNS to handle the kii.kimball.com zone. But that is the end of the joy... After rebooting the kii.kimball.com domain controller, it sat at the Preparing Network Connections screen for 15 minutes, popped up a service didn't start message, and finally let me log in. Upon logging in and checking the event viewer, I found that it was the netlogon service that wouldn't start. It was complaining that it could not update DNS. Sure enough, when I check DNS on that server, it appeared OK but the kii.kimball.com zone was empty. At that point, I blew the kii.kimball.com domain controller away, and re-cloned our NT 4 PDC. Unfortunately, now when I try to upgrade the NT4 KII domain into AD as kii.kimball.com, I get the message that kii.kimball.com already exists. I can't find any way of deleting domains in the AD tools. I've tried using ADSUTIL as outlined in Q216498 (removing active directory data after an unsuccessful demotion), which gave no errors, but I still can't upgrade KII. All my win2k servers were patched to SP2, and the NT 4 server was at sp6a. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT4 RAS Related Issue ... please assist.
Maybe IP forwarding is not set? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT4 RAS Related Issue ... please assist. Its passing correct information. That's how PPP works - all non-local traffic goes out the pipe. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: David Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT4 RAS Related Issue ... please assist. Dear all, I understand that this is an Exchange discussion, however I believe there are a number of NT Gurus amongst the group, I hope everyone can assist me on this one, thanks in advance. I have a NT Server 4 machine (SP6a) that is running DHCP/WINS (PDC). I install a Perle 4-Port Multimodem card into the machine. The card is detected and the ports 2,3,45 are created automatically via the software CD provided. I reinstalled SP6a and following that, I installed the Remote Access Server (Service) in network neighbourhood properties. I selected the perle modem ports and assign for all to receive calls only, and with network attributes of allow unsecured password/allow clear text passwords, after which the machine was again restarted and logged in. My Problem: - When a client dials in to the server, it connects and authenticates the users, and a session is established, BUT the IP address I received is as follows: IP Address - aaa.bbb.ccc.144 (eg.) Subnet Mask - 255.255.255.255 Gateway - aaa.bbb.ccc.144 The subnet mask is not correct (it is supposed to be 255.255.255.128) as configured in the DHCP Scope properties. Why is this so??? The server configuration is as follows: IP address:aaa.bbb.ccc.11 Subnet mask: 255.255.255.128 Gateway: aaa.bbb.ccc.1 DNS: aaa.bbb.ccc.10 (Server 2) It is running the following services 1) WINS/DHCP/RAS and the standard NT4 Server default installed services What do I have to do to allow the DHCP to pass the IP address info and other particulars to the users who are dialling in to the server??? The users are configured with the lowest security level to reduce complications (clear text password allowed) and the clients range from Win95/98/NT/2000 with dial up networking. I have done on both occasions to test - tick and untick IP Forwarding, but to no success. The major problem is that Exchange server is running on Server 2, and if the dial in users cannot get the right subnet mask etc. they will be on separate networks and cannot ping or resolve the Mail server address altogether. I have also tried installing the RIP for Internet Protocol Service to test if that would help with routing between the Network card and the Perle card, but to no success. If anyone has any suggestions or have encountered a fix for similar problems, please advise. All contributions from the group is much appreciated. Thanks in advance. Sincerely, David Ng _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony UK. (04) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Outlook Web Access
Success! Thanks Tristan / Matt! -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access We have a winner... That's it exactly. You have to rename the files to Setup.exe -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access It's a Select disk - from memory you need to copy the files to the server, rename srvmin or srvmax to setup and then run it. Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access It has been discussed here. Check the archives. I'm also pretty sure that there is a Q-article on it, but I can't find it. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Web Access Is anybody running Windows 2000, SP2, with Exchange 5.5 SP4, and implementing Outlook Web Access? We are trying to implement OWA, but we keep getting an error message that says Setup has detected that you are not running a set of Windows NT related fixes required for Outlook Web Access. The only thing that I could find in TechNet referred to NT 4.0 and said the cause of the problem is that you don't have service pack 3 or later installed. OWA must be thinking that the SP2 we are running is applying to an NT 4.0 system, when in fact, it is applying to a Windows 2000 system. Has anybody seen this before and been able to work around it? Thanks! Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: 5.5.0 DNR
The manual SMTP session seemed to work fine. No reply yet, but no errors either. The other end is and Exchange 5.5 box: 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready It seemed pretty slow to establish the initial connection, maybe 30 seconds. Any other ideas? I want to make sure it is not a setting on my end before I call to hassle them. Thanks. Tim Hooks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR what happens when you do a manual SMTP session with their server? Q153119 -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Smoking Kills. If you're killed, you've lost a very important part of your life. - Brooke Shields, during an interview to become spokesperson for a federal anti-smoking campaign - -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5.0 DNR I am getting the message below back from an email server in Luxembourg after about 5 minutes. I am sending from Exchange 2000, SP2. I am able to communicate with this address from a hotmail account. Perhaps unrelated, but I noticed their website seems to be a Netscape server. Our internet mail connector sends ehlo does not send etrn/turn. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE KBHR 65 E. State Street, Suite 1800 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Test Sent: 1/16/2002 8:16 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Joe Schmoe' on 1/16/2002 8:21 AM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. aries.inside.kbhr.com #5.5.0 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem
Windows 2K SP2 ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem What OS on the laptops? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 21:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes back telling me my credentials are wrong. Which is incorrect because it worked from the 2nd serverWhat a pain. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Normally? Are some not doing this? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem The server is in the same domain. So there is no trust relationship between them. Well, it works for users on the 2nd mail server that houses mailboxes. But it doesn't work for the first. Normally, we have users loggin in under the domain account profile. But for some reason it works for some and not others. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Is the other server in another domain? Is there a trust relationship between the two? If not, this is what I would expect to see on the client. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Problem All, I'm having a strange problem. We have 2 Exchange 5.5 servers that houses mailboxes. When users are logged into their local computer and they try to access their Outlook they get prompted for their credentials and once they put
RE: Outlook BUG question
Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.
RE: Outlook Problem
Yes, OWA works fine ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Can you logon through OWA *on* the cranky server? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes back telling me my credentials are wrong. Which is incorrect because it worked from the 2nd serverWhat a pain. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Normally? Are some not doing this? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem The server is in the same domain. So there is no trust relationship between them. Well, it works for users on the 2nd mail server that houses mailboxes. But it doesn't work for the first. Normally, we have users loggin in under the domain account profile. But for some reason it works for some and not others. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Is the other server in another domain? Is there a trust relationship between the two? If not, this is what I would expect to see on the client. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Problem All, I'm having a strange problem. We have 2 Exchange 5.5 servers that houses mailboxes. When users are logged into their local computer and they try to access their Outlook they get prompted for
RE: Outlook Problem
No, the logs just show normal activity. Nothing stands out. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem So your Event Logs show anything? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes back telling me my credentials are wrong. Which is incorrect because it worked from the 2nd serverWhat a pain. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Normally? Are some not doing this? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem The server is in the same domain. So there is no trust relationship between them. Well, it works for users on the 2nd mail server that houses mailboxes. But it doesn't work for the first. Normally, we have users loggin in under the domain account profile. But for some reason it works for some and not others. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Is the other server in another domain? Is there a trust relationship between the two? If not, this is what I would expect to see on the client. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Problem All, I'm having a strange problem. We have 2 Exchange 5.5 servers that houses mailboxes. When users are
RE: Outlook BUG question
What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
RE: Outlook Problem
Yes to all your questions Ben. But the Exchange server isn't a DC. It's a standalone. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Just to be clear: Both servers in the same Exchange Site? NT4 is the OS on the servers, yes? Same NT Domain? Is that misbehaving server itself a DC? Are you logging into the mailbox on the misbehaving server with an Outlook profile that contains ONLY that mailbox? Is Outlook configured to use the NT Password Authentication? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes back telling me my credentials are wrong. Which is incorrect because it worked from the 2nd serverWhat a pain. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Normally? Are some not doing this? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem The server is in the same domain. So there is no trust relationship between them. Well, it works for users on the 2nd mail server that houses mailboxes. But it doesn't work for the first. Normally, we have users loggin in under the domain account profile. But for some reason it works for some and not others. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original
RE: Outlook BUG question
Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem
Both Exchange servers are member servers. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem That's a good question is one server a member and the other a DC? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Just to be clear: Both servers in the same Exchange Site? NT4 is the OS on the servers, yes? Same NT Domain? Is that misbehaving server itself a DC? Are you logging into the mailbox on the misbehaving server with an Outlook profile that contains ONLY that mailbox? Is Outlook configured to use the NT Password Authentication? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes back telling me my credentials are wrong. Which is incorrect because it worked from the 2nd serverWhat a pain. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Normally? Are some not doing this? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem The server is in the same domain. So there is no trust relationship between them. Well, it works for users on the 2nd mail server that houses mailboxes. But it doesn't work for the first. Normally, we have users loggin in under the domain account profile.
Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature
Is there anything on the server or client side of Exchange/Outlook that would not allow a user to delete an e-mail until it is actually opened or it stays in the mailbox at least for some predefined amount of time (say for 6 months before the user is able to delete it)? Is there any utility which can do this is if its not built-in already in the Exchange/Outlook. I have Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000. Thanks in advance for your responses . Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem
So if OWA works can we assume that the problem is at the client side? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Both Exchange servers are member servers. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem That's a good question is one server a member and the other a DC? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Just to be clear: Both servers in the same Exchange Site? NT4 is the OS on the servers, yes? Same NT Domain? Is that misbehaving server itself a DC? Are you logging into the mailbox on the misbehaving server with an Outlook profile that contains ONLY that mailbox? Is Outlook configured to use the NT Password Authentication? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes back telling me my credentials are wrong. Which is incorrect because it worked from the 2nd serverWhat a pain. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Normally? Are some not doing this? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange
RE: Outlook BUG question
It was his singing, I had to turn down my computer. ;0) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
-Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Ah management logic. If I really want it to happen, and keep on issuing decrees to make it so, then it will happen. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Major Misconceptions Held By Your Boss: That things happen just because they want them to. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem
NT Password Authentication ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem On the problem clients, what is under Tools/Services/server properties/advanced/logon network security. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes back telling me my credentials are wrong. Which is incorrect because it worked from the 2nd serverWhat a pain. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Normally? Are some not doing this? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem The server is in the same domain. So there is no trust relationship between them. Well, it works for users on the 2nd mail server that houses mailboxes. But it doesn't work for the first. Normally, we have users loggin in under the domain account profile. But for some reason it works for some and not others. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Is the other server in another domain? Is there a trust relationship between the two? If not, this is what I would expect to see on the client. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Problem All, I'm having a strange problem. We have 2 Exchange 5.5 servers that houses mailboxes. When users are logged into their local computer and
RE: Outlook Problem
Well, I'm just trying to figure out why this setup works on one server and not the other. I was able to connect on the Good server. AFter that I moved my mailbox to the Bad server I was unable to connect. So I don't think it's a client side problem. It looks more like on the server side. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem So if OWA works can we assume that the problem is at the client side? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Both Exchange servers are member servers. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem That's a good question is one server a member and the other a DC? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Just to be clear: Both servers in the same Exchange Site? NT4 is the OS on the servers, yes? Same NT Domain? Is that misbehaving server itself a DC? Are you logging into the mailbox on the misbehaving server with an Outlook profile that contains ONLY that mailbox? Is Outlook configured to use the NT Password Authentication? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes
RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural problems. (tm) Set your deleted items retention time very high. Hope you have lots of disk space. -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature Is there anything on the server or client side of Exchange/Outlook that would not allow a user to delete an e-mail until it is actually opened or it stays in the mailbox at least for some predefined amount of time (say for 6 months before the user is able to delete it)? Is there any utility which can do this is if its not built-in already in the Exchange/Outlook. I have Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000. Thanks in advance for your responses . Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam
Is anyone using the MessageLabs Anti-spam service or looked into them? http://www.messagelabs.com/ Just looking for some feedback as we are seriously considering their services so we don't have to take on the support for it internally if something goes wrong. Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Ah, you got no problems then! -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Yeah, that's amazing. Anyway I got 1 Ghz Processor, with 1 GB of ram, with RAID 1 and RAID 5. Regards, -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Irfan, you could run Mail Essentials and Groupshield together but you give no indication of the spec of your hardware so if I say yes and it all grinds to a halt, don't blame me! (Neil, have been using VScan 470 on Mimesweeper 4.2_6 and Groupshield, and Webshield and lucky rabbits feet and crossed fingers for god knows how long... I might just even install Trend for a bit of extra security, that'll be fun vbg) PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 09:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Don't forget that MailSweeper provides anti-virus capabilities as well as content checking, so one option is to get rid of GroupShield and just use MailSweeper (or Mail Essentials, or even the new Trend offering if you like integrated AV engines...) Neil -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 January 2002 09:24 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Anti-Spam Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I know paul, but question is can I run mail essential on the server running group shield. Is there any performance related issues etc. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I am already running Group Shield. Is it feasible to run mail essential as well? -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple bounce backs
This is what is happening: A user sends an email to a bad address and receives this error:,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Obviously, the syntax is incorrect with that comma in the beginning of it. The user receives the following message multiple times. 553 ,[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Unbalanced '' 553 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Unbalanced '' 550 ... User unknown 553 ',[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ,[EMAIL PROTECTED], Hurst, Fiona [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Unbalanced '' 553 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hurst, Fiona [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Unbalanced '' In addition, if there were any other CC'd users in this, they will receive the message multiple times as well. What I have done in the past, is to manually remove the message from the outbound queue which stops the problem. Our current configuration is Exchange 5.5 sp4 with post sp4 hotfixes, Antigen version 6.20.0842 A Gauntlet Firewall (which I don't administer so I don't have much info about it) Our IMC uses straight IP to point to the firewall, instead of using DNS. We have tried the DNS setting, and this fixed the situation, however, due to internal DNS situations, we can't keep this configuration. I've spoken to Microsoft a multitude of times about this and they keep blaming the firewall. Of course, the firewall people keep blaming Exchange. Has any one seen this, or have any suggestions? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem
I've got a similar issue affecting a 2K client that is not a domain member and connects through RAS or VPN. Server is NT 4.0 SP6A w/ 5.5 SP4 Previous server was a BDC and as long as the workstation was logged on using the same credentials as used on the network, member of a workgroup that had the same name as the domain, and logged into RAS or VPN using the correct credentials with appropriate domain specified, Outlook could synch (offline stores) automatically with no problems. Mailbox was moved to a new server that is not a DC and Outlook requires an additional logon to connect and at each synch. Security logging shows that the machine name is being passed as the domain name during the first login attempt so it is failing. Seems to me that NT authentication should default to checking the local SAM and then the domain SAM but my assumption is that the 2K client (maybe an SP2 bug or something) is passing the machine name as the domain when requested. This is true of any attempt to access a network resource on a non DC but I can access DC resources all day with no additional prompts. My only fix so far is to use XP as it passes the VPN or RAS provide credentials to all subsequent network connection attempts. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I'm just trying to figure out why this setup works on one server and not the other. I was able to connect on the Good server. AFter that I moved my mailbox to the Bad server I was unable to connect. So I don't think it's a client side problem. It looks more like on the server side. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem So if OWA works can we assume that the problem is at the client side? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Both Exchange servers are member servers. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem That's a good question is one server a member and the other a DC? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Just to be clear: Both servers in the same Exchange Site? NT4 is the OS on the servers, yes? Same NT Domain? Is that misbehaving server itself a DC? Are you logging into the mailbox on the misbehaving server with an Outlook profile that contains ONLY that mailbox? Is Outlook configured to use the NT Password Authentication? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January
RE: Outlook BUG question
So true.. our company logo should beWe love to micro manage LaCretia -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Ah management logic. If I really want it to happen, and keep on issuing decrees to make it so, then it will happen. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Major Misconceptions Held By Your Boss: That things happen just because they want them to. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature
Not in Exchange. You could implement an archival solution I suppose, depending on the actual desired objective. There are some archival solutions listed at www.mail-resources.com I believe. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature Is there anything on the server or client side of Exchange/Outlook that would not allow a user to delete an e-mail until it is actually opened or it stays in the mailbox at least for some predefined amount of time (say for 6 months before the user is able to delete it)? Is there any utility which can do this is if its not built-in already in the Exchange/Outlook. I have Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000. Thanks in advance for your responses . Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
Just wait till I start throwing dung at you. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is
RE: changing Outlook client mail profile
I have never had trouble with OL97 or OL98 reconnecting to the server after a move. Perhaps Sakti just has a bad setup, or bad colleagues. At a minimum they are clearly misinformed. Now to your response. You never once said that a colleague had planted this erroneous information in your head did you? Did you say that you've got Ed's Move Server method in hand? Er, no. You also said you were about to go hacking registries which as those of us who have actually read the FAQ already know, is completely unnecesary. But go right ahead anyway, please, don't, stop. -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing Outlook client mail profile FWIW (and certainly not to be argumentative) none of my Outlook 97 clients had any issues finding the new server when I moved Exchange to the new server using the ECMSM. I thought it was some really cool automagical $h!t. Perhaps I am easily impressed. I did leave the old server up for a few days so that people on travel would get back and reconnect. I don't know that I can come up with the version number of Outlook 97 that we used at that time though since everyone is now on Outlook 2000 but I know we were supposed to be at a very specific version of Outlook 97 which was decreed as good (in general not just for moving servers). Although I would be very surprised if every single machine was at that version. Ronni -Original Message- From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing Outlook client mail profile For your information I have been a member of this list for long enough to have read the FAQs. If a colleague of mine has suggested that Outlook 97 clients do not reconnect automatically to the new server, what harm is there in sending a message to this list to check up? That's what it's here for! If you cannot respond to such questions without being useless and sarcastic, don't respond at all, I would hope you might have something better to do with your time. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: changing Outlook client mail profile You don't do a thing except go read Ed's Move Server Method, which you clearly did not yet read, or you would have brilliantly awed us with your knowledge that you do not need to do a thing on the client. FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ -Original Message- From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: changing Outlook client mail profile Hi folks, We are installing an Exchange 5.5 server in an organisation with one other Exchange 5.5 server and are going to move everything from the old server to the new server. There are about 150 clients running Outlook version 5.0.2653.22 or less (which I understand implies they are all on Outlook97?). After moving the mailboxes, we need to point mail profiles to the new server, what is the best way to go about doing this? We were thinking of enforcing a registry change on each Windows client using the logon script (obviously this won't work for the Macs, but that's ok). I've discovered utilities like NEWPROF ... but I wonder if anyone can confirm this is the best way? Thanks Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature
Sorry, it can be more clear: so that the mail sender within the same organization can set-up the property in the outgoing e-mail such that the recipient can not delete the mail (or mark as read) until he fulfills the sender's attributes . -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural problems. (tm) Set your deleted items retention time very high. Hope you have lots of disk space. -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature Is there anything on the server or client side of Exchange/Outlook that would not allow a user to delete an e-mail until it is actually opened or it stays in the mailbox at least for some predefined amount of time (say for 6 months before the user is able to delete it)? Is there any utility which can do this is if its not built-in already in the Exchange/Outlook. I have Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000. Thanks in advance for your responses . Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature
Sure, set the subject line to Complete the following or you shall be fired and terminate as appropriate. Insert EC truism here -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature Sorry, it can be more clear: so that the mail sender within the same organization can set-up the property in the outgoing e-mail such that the recipient can not delete the mail (or mark as read) until he fulfills the sender's attributes . -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural problems. (tm) Set your deleted items retention time very high. Hope you have lots of disk space. -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature Is there anything on the server or client side of Exchange/Outlook that would not allow a user to delete an e-mail until it is actually opened or it stays in the mailbox at least for some predefined amount of time (say for 6 months before the user is able to delete it)? Is there any utility which can do this is if its not built-in already in the Exchange/Outlook. I have Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000. Thanks in advance for your responses . Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
I would just catch it and throw it right back at you!!! LaCretia -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Just wait till I start throwing dung at you. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature
-Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature Sorry, it can be more clear: I thought Lori's reply was pretty clear. so that the mail sender within the same organization can set-up the property in the outgoing e-mail such that the recipient can not delete the mail (or mark as read) until he fulfills the sender's attributes . Can't see a way this can be done without some 3rd party stuff I've not heard of, and even then I doubt it. Scenario: you implement a magic utility to do this on the server. User comes along, downloads mail to a PST, or via POP to Outlook Express on their home machine while they are working from home one day. They then disconnect from the server to read their email locally at their leisure. How could anything possibly control what happens to the mail objects in this scenario? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rules for sysadmins # 705: If I am in any doubt as to how a wildcard will expand I will echo it first. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
I have now placed my 'anti dung' screen on my monitor. Strange, i can no longer see mails from Richard Tener... Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Just wait till I start throwing dung at you. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature
You need the StiCk. -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature Is there anything on the server or client side of Exchange/Outlook that would not allow a user to delete an e-mail until it is actually opened or it stays in the mailbox at least for some predefined amount of time (say for 6 months before the user is able to delete it)? Is there any utility which can do this is if its not built-in already in the Exchange/Outlook. I have Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000. Thanks in advance for your responses . Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clarify Service account understanding, please
Thanks Chris. I admit this is the only part I wasn't sure on, if I gave a new NT account service admin rights over the site and config containers but I couldn't find any articles relating to if this would work. I guess it would still be okay when you removed the first server in the site? I had read the SWINC FAQ but discounted it as I had a multi-server, multi-site implementation and the article and Q152808 suggested this method could only be used in a single server, single site deployment. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clarify Service account understanding, please You've missed something. :) You can have more than one account in the site which has service account admin privledges and you can also change the service account (http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxe.htm). Making the change isn't trivial, but it is possible. -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 1/16/2002 7:46 AM Subject: Clarify Service account understanding, please Hope you guys can help with this query to checkout my chain of thought. Exchange 5.5 Organisation, multi-ste and multi-server. Current servers are located in a resource domain with a trust relationship to the user domain. The resource domain needs to be retired to consolidate domains, the service account is in the resource domain. I have new servers to move into the site and do an Ed C Server Move, but that would require the new servers to use the existing service account when they join the site. Therefore the only way to remove the resource domain and get over the service account problem would be to create a new site with a new service account. Am I right or have I missed something? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee and are confidential. They may also be legally privileged. Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis Consulting PLC [Delphis] and they must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this e-mail and any accompanying files in error, you may not copy, publish or use them in any way and you should delete them from your system and notify us immediately. E-mails are not secure. Delphis does not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails that occur after they have been sent. Any opinions expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Delphis. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Really Off Topic
Ok here is another one for you... I have my AD setup and I am assiging OfficeXP, Visio 2002 and McAfee Virus Scan. My Windows 2000 machines install with no problems, my Winodws XP machines only install McAfee. Now my Office and Visio assignments came After Mcafee was installed... Could it be causing a conflict? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Really Off Topic There are a set of tools for AD, one tool in the set allows you to force replication. Does anyone know what the name of this tool set id? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem
Have you checked to make sure users have rights to access this computer from the network on the problem server? Tom. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I'm just trying to figure out why this setup works on one server and not the other. I was able to connect on the Good server. AFter that I moved my mailbox to the Bad server I was unable to connect. So I don't think it's a client side problem. It looks more like on the server side. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem So if OWA works can we assume that the problem is at the client side? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Both Exchange servers are member servers. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem That's a good question is one server a member and the other a DC? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Just to be clear: Both servers in the same Exchange Site? NT4 is the OS on the servers, yes? Same NT Domain? Is that misbehaving server itself a DC? Are you logging into the mailbox on the misbehaving server with an Outlook profile that contains ONLY that mailbox? Is Outlook configured to use the NT Password Authentication? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the
RE: Outlook BUG question
Do you sell those? I could really use one? How about a 'full body anti dung suit'? I could really use one around here. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question I have now placed my 'anti dung' screen on my monitor. Strange, i can no longer see mails from Richard Tener... Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Just wait till I start throwing dung at you. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5.0 DNR
It went like this: Me - telnet 194.154.211.74 25 (20 -30 second wait - maybe they should look at Q286375...) Them - 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready Me - HELO mail.arendt-medernach.lu Them - 250 OK Me - MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Them - 250 OK MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Me - RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Them - 250 OK Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED] Me - DATA Them - 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF Me - Subject: test (enter enter) Me - Test message...blah,blah,blah (enter . enter) Them - 250 OK Me - QUIT Them - 221 closing connection So far no reply and no bounce either. My internet mail connector does not have the Send HELO instead of EHLO checked. So below is the script if I use EHLO. 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5. 2653.13) ready 250-XCHGSERVER.NTDOM Hello [TEAM_MAIL] 250-XEXCH50 250-HELP 250-ETRN 250-DSN 250-SIZE 5242880 250-AUTH LOGIN 250 AUTH=LOGIN 250 OK - mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 OK - Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED] 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF 250 OK QUIT 221 closing connection I am using Exchange 2000 SP2. Do most people send EHLO? Do most people have SMTP connectors set up to not send etrn/turn? Hell, maybe I should get rid of my SMTP connector and just let the default smtp virtual server handle everything. Thoughts and suggestions welcomed. Tim Hooks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR You tried to send it to Joe Schmoe? Did you use HELO or EHLO? Please post the transcript of your manual session. -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - No Matter how Great and Destructive your Problems May Seem Now, Remember, You've Probably only Seen the Tip of Them - -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR The manual SMTP session seemed to work fine. No reply yet, but no errors either. The other end is and Exchange 5.5 box: 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready It seemed pretty slow to establish the initial connection, maybe 30 seconds. Any other ideas? I want to make sure it is not a setting on my end before I call to hassle them. Thanks. Tim Hooks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR what happens when you do a manual SMTP session with their server? Q153119 -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Smoking Kills. If you're killed, you've lost a very important part of your life. - Brooke Shields, during an interview to become spokesperson for a federal anti-smoking campaign - -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5.0 DNR I am getting the message below back from an email server in Luxembourg after about 5 minutes. I am sending from Exchange 2000, SP2. I am able to communicate with this address from a hotmail account. Perhaps unrelated, but I noticed their website seems to be a Netscape server. Our internet mail connector sends ehlo does not send etrn/turn. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE KBHR 65 E. State Street, Suite 1800 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Test Sent: 1/16/2002 8:16 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Joe Schmoe' on 1/16/2002 8:21 AM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. aries.inside.kbhr.com #5.5.0 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Outlook Problem
I forgot to mention. Check the problem server's security log for 534 errors. If you see them, take a look at Q159930. Tom. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Have you checked to make sure users have rights to access this computer from the network on the problem server? Tom. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I'm just trying to figure out why this setup works on one server and not the other. I was able to connect on the Good server. AFter that I moved my mailbox to the Bad server I was unable to connect. So I don't think it's a client side problem. It looks more like on the server side. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem So if OWA works can we assume that the problem is at the client side? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Both Exchange servers are member servers. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem That's a good question is one server a member and the other a DC? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Just to be clear: Both servers in the same Exchange Site? NT4 is the OS on the servers, yes? Same NT Domain? Is that misbehaving server itself a DC? Are you logging into the mailbox on the misbehaving server with an Outlook profile that contains ONLY that mailbox? Is Outlook configured to use the NT Password Authentication? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon
AW: Multiple bounce backs
IMHO MS is right: We have had similar problems in the past. Every time it happened, our firewall people claimed innocence, and every time they were eventually proven guilty. Thomas -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jonathan Beeler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2002 16:06 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: Multiple bounce backs This is what is happening: A user sends an email to a bad address and receives this error:,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Obviously, the syntax is incorrect with that comma in the beginning of it. The user receives the following message multiple times. 553 ,[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Unbalanced '' 553 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Unbalanced '' 550 ... User unknown 553 ',[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ,[EMAIL PROTECTED], Hurst, Fiona [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Unbalanced '' 553 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hurst, Fiona [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Unbalanced '' In addition, if there were any other CC'd users in this, they will receive the message multiple times as well. What I have done in the past, is to manually remove the message from the outbound queue which stops the problem. Our current configuration is Exchange 5.5 sp4 with post sp4 hotfixes, Antigen version 6.20.0842 A Gauntlet Firewall (which I don't administer so I don't have much info about it) Our IMC uses straight IP to point to the firewall, instead of using DNS. We have tried the DNS setting, and this fixed the situation, however, due to internal DNS situations, we can't keep this configuration. I've spoken to Microsoft a multitude of times about this and they keep blaming the firewall. Of course, the firewall people keep blaming Exchange. Has any one seen this, or have any suggestions? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5.0 DNR
Does this problem still happen? It looks to me like it was just an aberration. You might try turning your SMTP logging up a few notches, try sending again (via mail client, not manually), then checking the logs. You don't have a PIX firewall in place, do you? You might check to make sure that whatever firewall you have lets ESMTP thru unmolested. -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so, Brain, but what if the hippopotamus won't wear the beach thong? - -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR It went like this: Me - telnet 194.154.211.74 25 (20 -30 second wait - maybe they should look at Q286375...) Them - 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready Me - HELO mail.arendt-medernach.lu Them - 250 OK Me - MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Them - 250 OK MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Me - RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Them - 250 OK Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED] Me - DATA Them - 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF Me - Subject: test (enter enter) Me - Test message...blah,blah,blah (enter . enter) Them - 250 OK Me - QUIT Them - 221 closing connection So far no reply and no bounce either. My internet mail connector does not have the Send HELO instead of EHLO checked. So below is the script if I use EHLO. 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5. 2653.13) ready 250-XCHGSERVER.NTDOM Hello [TEAM_MAIL] 250-XEXCH50 250-HELP 250-ETRN 250-DSN 250-SIZE 5242880 250-AUTH LOGIN 250 AUTH=LOGIN 250 OK - mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 OK - Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED] 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF 250 OK QUIT 221 closing connection I am using Exchange 2000 SP2. Do most people send EHLO? Do most people have SMTP connectors set up to not send etrn/turn? Hell, maybe I should get rid of my SMTP connector and just let the default smtp virtual server handle everything. Thoughts and suggestions welcomed. Tim Hooks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR You tried to send it to Joe Schmoe? Did you use HELO or EHLO? Please post the transcript of your manual session. -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - No Matter how Great and Destructive your Problems May Seem Now, Remember, You've Probably only Seen the Tip of Them - -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR The manual SMTP session seemed to work fine. No reply yet, but no errors either. The other end is and Exchange 5.5 box: 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready It seemed pretty slow to establish the initial connection, maybe 30 seconds. Any other ideas? I want to make sure it is not a setting on my end before I call to hassle them. Thanks. Tim Hooks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR what happens when you do a manual SMTP session with their server? Q153119 -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Smoking Kills. If you're killed, you've lost a very important part of your life. - Brooke Shields, during an interview to become spokesperson for a federal anti-smoking campaign - -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5.0 DNR I am getting the message below back from an email server in Luxembourg after about 5 minutes. I am sending from Exchange 2000, SP2. I am able to communicate with this address from a hotmail account. Perhaps unrelated, but I noticed their website seems to be a Netscape server. Our internet mail connector sends
Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
SC Magazine just did an E2K AV review. More information about it is available here: http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=article; sid=72mode=order=0 (link may wrap) Just goes to show everyone has an opinion I guess. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
Wow!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup SC Magazine just did an E2K AV review. More information about it is available here: http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=article; sid=72mode=order=0 (link may wrap) Just goes to show everyone has an opinion I guess. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ahem, Server Configuration question for swap
Wise aged Exchange Pros: Does putting the swap file on it's own spindle, gain much in performance? Or is it better to just split the system mirror and put the swap on the second half? Proposed configuration is: 1. Mirror for system 1 Mirror for swap 1 Mirror for logs 1 Raid 0+1 for database Total = 10 drives in this config The Chassis holds 9 drives, so one option is to split the system mirror for the swap partition or add an expansion chassis and move the database to make room for the hot spare and keep the swap on its own spindles. Performance isn't an issue, these boxes have MIPS to spare, but have any of you noticed a gain in performance by separating the swap? Any of you made this decision, and why? tia Nathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
hmmm. Odd choices. Not to mention that everyone gets at least 4 1/2 stars out of a possible 5. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup SC Magazine just did an E2K AV review. More information about it is available here: http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=article; sid=72mode=order=0 (link may wrap) Just goes to show everyone has an opinion I guess. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration to Exchange 2000
Another question I have is, can you migrate from one Forest to another using MS Migrate? I am attempting to create a new forest and move a EX5.5 system to E2K in a entirely new forest domain. I am ditching the 5.5 system all together, I just need the old mail moved, so I don't believe I need the ADC. But I thought I remember some one saying that you can not move from one forest to another using the MS migration tool. Is this correct? I have not found booo on the MS site. -John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: MS Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: kukar kothari [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: Migration to Exchange 2000 Hello, You need AD deployed first. Good posts in this list's archive on this subject. MS has some good white papers in the technet section and elsewhere: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/default.asp I labed our migration many times over many months, and things always went well. The production migration didn't go as well. Primarily, I'm left with a strange Distribution Group problem that I can't nest them or use them to restrict who can send to a Distribution Group. They get stuck in the directory lookup queue with a Categorizer error. MS PSS has been looking at it for a month. If I had to do it over again I think I'd setup an entirely new AD domain, E2K environment, and NOT do in-place upgrades. It worked great in the lab ... not saying it can't. But I wouldn't do it again. Why do you want to upgrade anyway? We have somewhat of a mandate to be running new stuff, but for a small organization like ours (single site, 1 domain, 2,000 users, small tech admin group,...), it sure hasn't lowered our TCO. The loss of Exchange 5.5 Import/Export is a real bummer, among other things. Brent -Original Message- From: kukar kothari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:34 PM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Migration to Exchange 2000 Subject: Migration to Exchange 2000 Dear All, I am new to Exchange and have a couple of q's about migration to E2K. Can I build and deploy an E2k Server in NT4 domain now and eventually migrate to Windows 2000 AD domain at a later stage. Is it necessary to have Active Directory Installed in order to migrate from Exchange 55 sp4 to E2K. Thanks Kukar __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
norton wins? are they mad? symantec are too slow with their updates, hours behind trend during recent outbreaks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
Shouldn't really be much of a surprise. It's kind of like VARBusiness and CNR constantly giving CA products very high marks in reviews. I believe the reviews are written by a bunch of trolls that never actually install the products, let alone use them. They read the back of the boxes and write a review. Why test or evaluate? They wrote what the product can do on the back of the boxes. Why would they lie? My $.02 Tom. -Original Message- From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup Amusing that they give 5 stars to several of the products, don't do a real serious test, in my opinion like flooding 35,000 viruses at one time and watch the hits, and they pick Norton? While the majority of the admins on this list will give you a tie between Antigen and Scan Mail? Everyone does have an opinion, and seems the mag's that test this stuff, certainly don't appear to work on production systems with more than 150 users. Nathan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup SC Magazine just did an E2K AV review. More information about it is available here: http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=News file=article sid=72mode=order=0 (link may wrap) Just goes to show everyone has an opinion I guess. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
sung to the Beverly Hillbillies Theme Let me tell you a story about man named Wang, Thought he'd make some bucks by buying up ol' Cheyenne. Long Island is the place you wanna be, so he took over CA and made the users scream. ArcServe that is. Inoculan. Brick Level Backups. Blue Screens. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup Shouldn't really be much of a surprise. It's kind of like VARBusiness and CNR constantly giving CA products very high marks in reviews. I believe the reviews are written by a bunch of trolls that never actually install the products, let alone use them. They read the back of the boxes and write a review. Why test or evaluate? They wrote what the product can do on the back of the boxes. Why would they lie? My $.02 Tom. -Original Message- From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup Amusing that they give 5 stars to several of the products, don't do a real serious test, in my opinion like flooding 35,000 viruses at one time and watch the hits, and they pick Norton? While the majority of the admins on this list will give you a tie between Antigen and Scan Mail? Everyone does have an opinion, and seems the mag's that test this stuff, certainly don't appear to work on production systems with more than 150 users. Nathan -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup SC Magazine just did an E2K AV review. More information about it is available here: http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=News file=article sid=72mode=order=0 (link may wrap) Just goes to show everyone has an opinion I guess. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: saving a copy of all attachments'
Thanks Chris, That was exactly what I was looking for. What I am doing after I enabled journaling was to send all messages to a mailbox and then set up a rule to move the attachments to a personal folder. Works well. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5.0 DNR
Mail comes in with out a problem from this person. Both manual tests I sent earlier were received. However, it was a problem all yesterday, this morning, and continues to be a problem now. No, no pix firewall in place. Do you suppose it could be related to Q286375? Do you know of a way to lengthen the time my server will wait for a response? Tim Hooks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR Does this problem still happen? It looks to me like it was just an aberration. You might try turning your SMTP logging up a few notches, try sending again (via mail client, not manually), then checking the logs. You don't have a PIX firewall in place, do you? You might check to make sure that whatever firewall you have lets ESMTP thru unmolested. -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so, Brain, but what if the hippopotamus won't wear the beach thong? - -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR It went like this: Me - telnet 194.154.211.74 25 (20 -30 second wait - maybe they should look at Q286375...) Them - 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready Me - HELO mail.arendt-medernach.lu Them - 250 OK Me - MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Them - 250 OK MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Me - RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Them - 250 OK Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED] Me - DATA Them - 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF Me - Subject: test (enter enter) Me - Test message...blah,blah,blah (enter . enter) Them - 250 OK Me - QUIT Them - 221 closing connection So far no reply and no bounce either. My internet mail connector does not have the Send HELO instead of EHLO checked. So below is the script if I use EHLO. 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5. 2653.13) ready 250-XCHGSERVER.NTDOM Hello [TEAM_MAIL] 250-XEXCH50 250-HELP 250-ETRN 250-DSN 250-SIZE 5242880 250-AUTH LOGIN 250 AUTH=LOGIN 250 OK - mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 OK - Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED] 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF 250 OK QUIT 221 closing connection I am using Exchange 2000 SP2. Do most people send EHLO? Do most people have SMTP connectors set up to not send etrn/turn? Hell, maybe I should get rid of my SMTP connector and just let the default smtp virtual server handle everything. Thoughts and suggestions welcomed. Tim Hooks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR You tried to send it to Joe Schmoe? Did you use HELO or EHLO? Please post the transcript of your manual session. -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - No Matter how Great and Destructive your Problems May Seem Now, Remember, You've Probably only Seen the Tip of Them - -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR The manual SMTP session seemed to work fine. No reply yet, but no errors either. The other end is and Exchange 5.5 box: 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready It seemed pretty slow to establish the initial connection, maybe 30 seconds. Any other ideas? I want to make sure it is not a setting on my end before I call to hassle them. Thanks. Tim Hooks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR what happens when you do a manual SMTP session with their server? Q153119 -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Smoking Kills. If you're killed, you've lost a very important part of your life. - Brooke Shields, during an interview to become spokesperson for a federal anti-smoking campaign
