RE: Problem with accessing a PF

2002-05-24 Thread Scott Perley-TM

Here's my WAG...

Is there another list granting lesser access to the folder that this user
may be a part of?  We have seen instances where a user is in a group with
owner permissions but then also in a group with read permissions and they
only end up getting read permissions.  We've found that removing the list
with owner access from the acl list and then adding it back in fixed the
problem.  Not 100% sure why.

Scott Perley
TELUS Mobility



-Original Message-
From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 6:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem with accessing a PF


NT 4 SP6a SRP
Exchange 5.5 SP4

I have what started as one, but is now up to four users who will lose access
to some of our public folders at seemingly random intervals.

This has happened to the original user about three times in the last month
to six weeks.  The user has reviewer permission to the folder through a
distribution list, and will still be listed in the DL, but cannot see the
contents of the folder.  Also, he does not get the error message about not
having permission, just, Unable to display the folder.

He can, however, read the subfolders he has permission to that are
underneath this folder. (and to which he has the exact same rights!)

The only temporary fix we had found was to remove the user from the DL, wait
for replication to complete, then re-add his account to the DL, but lately
that hasn't been working either.  Also, giving him reviewer rights by name
to the folder does not work.

To throw one last curve in, the users can access these folders through OWA.

So far, this has happened to three users on the same folder, and a fourth
user on a different folder.  

Any solutions, suggestions or WAGs would be most appreciated.

Thanks.


Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm  Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
Twentynine Palms, CA 92278

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Public Folders

2002-05-24 Thread Mark Peoples

search technet public folder replication

-Original Message-
From: Cedric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving Public Folders


This may be a stupid question, how do you move public folders from one
exchange 2k server to another in the same domain. So that the first
server can be removed.

Cedric Sykes


712 Anderman Lane

Suite 403

Darien IL, 60561
630-986-1528

 http://www.compuonenetwork.com/ http://www.CompuOneNetwork.com



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange 5.5 back up server, recreate mailboxes etc

2002-05-24 Thread Louis Joyce

Have you read the disaster recovery white paper?

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 15:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 back up server, recreate mailboxes etc


Hi all,  Anyone have any thoughts on how do this.

One Exchange server on local network, another server at a remote site
(connected by T1).  Remote site is for distaster recovery, not being used
for anything.  I can configure this server however I want.

All mail, public folders etc sit on local server.  In the event of failure
what is the best way to get the mailboxes etc moved to remote site. I
would like this to be a hot site ready to be switched over.  I have 
tested and replicate public folders ok, and directory info ok (made remote
server in teh same site (I could change this however)), but dont know the
best way for the mailboxes to be rehomed over there and created for that
matter,  anyone have any ideas?  We really cant go to MS cluster right now
and redo the original server.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 5.4.4

2002-05-24 Thread Andy David

Which doesnt work if the mailbox is hidden [1] 

[1] In that case, send an email to the SMTP address with a delivery receipt.
[2] 
[2] Unless that SMTP address is a DL with no members, in which case it will
simply disappear. 




-Original Message-
From: Judi McLane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.4.4


Create a new mail message and enter the address you want to look up in the
to field then Alt+K.  The result will be the mailbox where that smtp
address resides.

BTW - this is for 5.5 never tried it on E2K.

Judi McLane
Information Systems Analyst
CEEUS, Inc.
101 Enterprise Parkway
West Columbia, SC  29171
803/ 822-8100 Ext 135


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 5.4.4


This is killing me.   I have a user on exch5.5 SP4 whos smtp address is
domain.com.  When I am trying to send to him I get the following NDR.
Notice how it put the 1 at the end of the domain name.  I am trying to send
to him from a exh2k SP2 server in the same site.  I have checked every where
and cannot find where Exchange is finding this address?   Any ideas?
Thanks.




Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp.domain.com
Received-From-MTA: dns; exchange.domain.com (unverified [x.x.x.x)
Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:16:21 -0400

Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.4 (Permanent failure - routing/network: unable to route)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 5.4.4

2002-05-24 Thread Woodruff, Michael

I figured out what the problem was.  For some Unknown reason, the AD
Attribute Target Address was set to point to a bad domain.   What is this
attribute used for anyway?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.4.4


Which doesnt work if the mailbox is hidden [1] 

[1] In that case, send an email to the SMTP address with a delivery receipt.
[2] 
[2] Unless that SMTP address is a DL with no members, in which case it will
simply disappear. 




-Original Message-
From: Judi McLane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.4.4


Create a new mail message and enter the address you want to look up in the
to field then Alt+K.  The result will be the mailbox where that smtp
address resides.

BTW - this is for 5.5 never tried it on E2K.

Judi McLane
Information Systems Analyst
CEEUS, Inc.
101 Enterprise Parkway
West Columbia, SC  29171
803/ 822-8100 Ext 135


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 5.4.4


This is killing me.   I have a user on exch5.5 SP4 whos smtp address is
domain.com.  When I am trying to send to him I get the following NDR. Notice
how it put the 1 at the end of the domain name.  I am trying to send to him
from a exh2k SP2 server in the same site.  I have checked every where
and cannot find where Exchange is finding this address?   Any ideas?
Thanks.




Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp.domain.com
Received-From-MTA: dns; exchange.domain.com (unverified [x.x.x.x)
Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:16:21 -0400

Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.4 (Permanent failure - routing/network: unable to route)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Bendall, Paul

Hi all,

Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains

Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to access another's
calendar from Outlook using File open other users folder. In the past this
has been successful but is now failing saying that the information store is
not available, however if you add a new user from the same domain with the
same permissions on the calendar it opens without a problem. The Exchange
servers are in a resource domain with a two-way trust to the user domain.
Anyone got an ideas?

TIA

Paul


--
If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: remote administration, archive options

2002-05-24 Thread Tom Meunier

Mailbox Manager.  I'm going to assume that you use Exchange 2000 SP1 or
greater, because that's what I feel like assuming this morning.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q278024


-Original Message-
From: Brendan Kenny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:54 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: remote administration, archive options
Subject: remote administration, archive options


Is there any way to have autoarchive options on each folder in all
mailboxes in an orginazation set using some kind of remote
administration. We can set these options in the initial setup but if the
user creates a new folder then how can we be sure it's set properly. Can
we also set it so that users can't change these settings?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 5.4.4

2002-05-24 Thread Andy David

IIRC, the target address is the default external address for an object.


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.4.4


I figured out what the problem was.  For some Unknown reason, the AD
Attribute Target Address was set to point to a bad domain.   What is this
attribute used for anyway?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.4.4


Which doesnt work if the mailbox is hidden [1] 

[1] In that case, send an email to the SMTP address with a delivery receipt.
[2] 
[2] Unless that SMTP address is a DL with no members, in which case it will
simply disappear. 




-Original Message-
From: Judi McLane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.4.4


Create a new mail message and enter the address you want to look up in the
to field then Alt+K.  The result will be the mailbox where that smtp
address resides.

BTW - this is for 5.5 never tried it on E2K.

Judi McLane
Information Systems Analyst
CEEUS, Inc.
101 Enterprise Parkway
West Columbia, SC  29171
803/ 822-8100 Ext 135


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 5.4.4


This is killing me.   I have a user on exch5.5 SP4 whos smtp address is
domain.com.  When I am trying to send to him I get the following NDR. Notice
how it put the 1 at the end of the domain name.  I am trying to send to him
from a exh2k SP2 server in the same site.  I have checked every where
and cannot find where Exchange is finding this address?   Any ideas?
Thanks.




Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp.domain.com
Received-From-MTA: dns; exchange.domain.com (unverified [x.x.x.x)
Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:16:21 -0400

Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.4 (Permanent failure - routing/network: unable to route)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Andy David

What is the exact error message?
Is this happening to more than one person?


-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Opening other users calendar


Hi all,

Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains

Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to access another's
calendar from Outlook using File open other users folder. In the past this
has been successful but is now failing saying that the information store is
not available, however if you add a new user from the same domain with the
same permissions on the calendar it opens without a problem. The Exchange
servers are in a resource domain with a two-way trust to the user domain.
Anyone got an ideas?

TIA

Paul


--
If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: remote administration, archive options

2002-05-24 Thread Andy David

It is a Friday after all. 
Assume away!


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: remote administration, archive options


Mailbox Manager.  I'm going to assume that you use Exchange 2000 SP1 or
greater, because that's what I feel like assuming this morning.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q278024


-Original Message-
From: Brendan Kenny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:54 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: remote administration, archive options
Subject: remote administration, archive options


Is there any way to have autoarchive options on each folder in all
mailboxes in an orginazation set using some kind of remote
administration. We can set these options in the initial setup but if the
user creates a new folder then how can we be sure it's set properly. Can
we also set it so that users can't change these settings?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Tony Hlabse

When it worked in the past were you in a NT4.0 domain setup and now that you
switched to AD it now fails?

- Original Message -
From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: Opening other users calendar


 Hi all,

 Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains

 Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to access another's
 calendar from Outlook using File open other users folder. In the past this
 has been successful but is now failing saying that the information store
is
 not available, however if you add a new user from the same domain with the
 same permissions on the calendar it opens without a problem. The Exchange
 servers are in a resource domain with a two-way trust to the user domain.
 Anyone got an ideas?

 TIA

 Paul


 --
 If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
 disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
 http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
 --


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Andy David

I think he is still on a NT domain.


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Opening other users calendar


When it worked in the past were you in a NT4.0 domain setup and now that you
switched to AD it now fails?

- Original Message -
From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: Opening other users calendar


 Hi all,

 Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains

 Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to access another's
 calendar from Outlook using File open other users folder. In the past this
 has been successful but is now failing saying that the information store
is
 not available, however if you add a new user from the same domain with the
 same permissions on the calendar it opens without a problem. The Exchange
 servers are in a resource domain with a two-way trust to the user domain.
 Anyone got an ideas?

 TIA

 Paul


 --
 If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
 disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
 http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
 --


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Martin Blackstone

Where are my pants?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


What is the best AV software?


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


October 8-11 Anaheim, CA

right off the page

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Compton CA!!!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Does anyone know where MEC is this year?


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get sick
of me and shell out the funds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
 Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
 
 Martin Blackstone
 Director, Information Technologies
 Superior Access Insurance Services
 949.470.2111 x279
 
 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his 
 head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: One more question and I'm done for the day

2002-05-24 Thread Woodruff, Michael

Yeah, it says look for other events.   The only other event is 9307.

-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One more question and I'm done for the day


So you looked at Q165017?

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: One more question and I'm done for the day


Weeding through these event Ids is starting to hurt my eyes.   Take a gander
at this.  Microsoft KB doesn't tell me anything?  Show me the money! Thanks.

Event ID: 9307 @ 9302

9302
The transport configuration type 1 for the directory entry CN=MICROSOFT
MTA,CN=SERVER,CN=SERVERS,CN=COLUMBUS,CN=ADMINISTRATIVE GROUPS,CN=GSW COMPANY
DIRECTORY,CN=MICROSOFT
EXCHANGE,CN=SERVICES,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=DOMAIN,DC=TLD is not one of the
supported values. Reconfigure the transport configuration type in the
identified directory entry. [BASE IL OPERATOR 42 217] (8)

9307
(BASE IL OPERATOR(42) Proc 221)   Address Registration failed for
transport type : 1 (8) 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Callan, Chris

I would ask my management to let me go, but I am getting married on the
12th, and it would interfere.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Where are my pants?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


What is the best AV software?


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


October 8-11 Anaheim, CA

right off the page

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Compton CA!!!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Does anyone know where MEC is this year?


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get sick
of me and shell out the funds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
 Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
 
 Martin Blackstone
 Director, Information Technologies
 Superior Access Insurance Services
 949.470.2111 x279
 
 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his 
 head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: 

RE: OWA connection

2002-05-24 Thread Mark Condron

Yes, I have changed the timeout and it still times out!! there are no other
problems with the Exchange server or IIS. This problem occurs both
internally and externally I feel the problem is with the authentication
between the OWA box and the Exchange server.

-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 23 May 2002 16:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA connection


Mark, locate this file.  At the top of the file just after the % do this

server.scripttimeout=300

This will allow your page to take up to 5 minutes to render.

It is also possible that the resource you are trying to connect to does not
exist.

Is the exchange server running?  Is your IIS Server hosting OWA running?

Can you access the exchange server running plain old outlook?

--Felicity
 All,
 
 I have NT 4.0 sp5 Proxy 2.0 sp2 and OWA sp4 on one box and NT 4.0 sp5 
 Ex5.5 sp4 on another box. I have followed the procedures to set up 
 OWA. When I access the page both internally and externally 
 (servername.com/exchange) I log on (using alias) and then put in a 
 username and password an hit return. I then wait and get the error 
 message below.
 
 error 'ASP 0113'
 Script timed out 
 
 /exchange/USA/LogonFrm.asp
 
 The maximum amount of time for a script to execute was exceeded. You 
 can change this limit by specifying a new value for the property 
 Server.ScriptTimeOut or by changing the value in the IIS 
 administration tools.
 
 I have looked on technet and only found how to extend the timout of 
 the scripts and even on 300 secs the script still times out. My 
 question is how does OWA communicate with Exchange server (RPC?) and 
 how do I troubleshoot this connection to find out what is causing the 
 timeout.
 
 TIA
 
 Mark Condron
 
 
 --
 CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
 confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. 
 Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking 
 any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities 
 other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have 
 received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately 
 and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. 
 -- 
 DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are 
 solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those 
 of Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specifically
stated.
 
 --
 
 Wales Council for Voluntary Action, Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, 
   Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH
 
 Reception (Head Office): 029 2043 1700 Help Desk: 0870 607 1666 /par 
 Fax: 029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702
 
   Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.wcva.org.uk 
 www.volunteering-wales.net

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking 
any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities 
other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have 
received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately 
and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. 
-- 
DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those 
of Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specifically stated.

-- 

Wales Council for Voluntary Action, Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, 
Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH 

Reception (Head Office): 029 2043 1700 Help Desk: 0870 607 1666 /par Fax:
029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702 

Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.wcva.org.uk
www.volunteering-wales.net

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Clark, John A (FUSA)

Chris, go to the Exchange Conference instead

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I would ask my management to let me go, but I am getting married on the
12th, and it would interfere.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Where are my pants?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


What is the best AV software?


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


October 8-11 Anaheim, CA

right off the page

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Compton CA!!!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Does anyone know where MEC is this year?


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get sick
of me and shell out the funds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
 Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
 
 Martin Blackstone
 Director, Information Technologies
 Superior Access Insurance Services
 949.470.2111 x279
 
 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his 
 head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


Email Limits

2002-05-24 Thread Crumbaker, Ron

OK, I need some help.  I have been looking for a setting in Exchange 2k,
and I can't seem to find it.

I am looking for the setting that limits the number of mail one person
can send out to another single mailbox.

What I am trying to do:

My HR Department posted a job online and have gotten a lot of
responses through emails to one mailbox.
He is wanting to forward 1/3 of the mail two other mailboxes so he
doesn't have to screen all the emails himself.

However, when I created a rule in Outlook to forward the mail to the
other mailboxes, it is only sending out 20.

I want to send out 200 from one mailbox to the other mailbox.


Or, if you have another solution that will work for me, I am open for
suggestions.



Thank you,

Ron Crumbaker, MCP
PC Systems Administrator
MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Clark, John A (FUSA)

I'm still trying to contact the A-Team, anyone see their ad in the newspaper
lately?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Where are my pants?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


What is the best AV software?


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


October 8-11 Anaheim, CA

right off the page

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Compton CA!!!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Does anyone know where MEC is this year?


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get sick
of me and shell out the funds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
 Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
 
 Martin Blackstone
 Director, Information Technologies
 Superior Access Insurance Services
 949.470.2111 x279
 
 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his 
 head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   

RE: Email Limits

2002-05-24 Thread Charles Carerros

Use Users and Computers on your E2K
Right click the user name select Properties
Then use the Exchange General tab
Click the Delivery Restrictions button

chuck 

-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Limits

OK, I need some help.  I have been looking for a setting in Exchange 2k,
and I can't seem to find it.

I am looking for the setting that limits the number of mail one person
can send out to another single mailbox.

What I am trying to do:

My HR Department posted a job online and have gotten a lot of
responses through emails to one mailbox.
He is wanting to forward 1/3 of the mail two other mailboxes so he
doesn't have to screen all the emails himself.

However, when I created a rule in Outlook to forward the mail to the
other mailboxes, it is only sending out 20.

I want to send out 200 from one mailbox to the other mailbox.


Or, if you have another solution that will work for me, I am open for
suggestions.



Thank you,

Ron Crumbaker, MCP
PC Systems Administrator
MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Email Limits

2002-05-24 Thread Felicity Smith

I am going out on a limb here, but I think Event Sinks might be an option.
 It seems to me that this event sink would run on every inbonud message
and look to see if it was addressed to the particular receipent, and then
do a redirect based on the previous number of emails regarding the job
opportunity.

To me, this might put a bit of a load on your server.  I can't quantify
this however.

--Felicity 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements

2002-05-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim

I guess the point of it would be YMMV. Depending on your traffic patterns,
your need to regulate traffic between sites by size and or times or to
throttle the connection. With E2K you put in your best guess and if it's not
what you need, it's not that hard to change it. We have two main data
centers with dual OC3's between them. I was going to have all the servers in
one great big routing group and if the network folks whine about all the
chatter, then I'll split them in two.

-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements


Exchange 2000 resource kit chapter 31 Reliable always on connectivity is
more important that high bandwdth this is the only reference I could
find.

There is also a white paper from MS but all it says is Generally, servers
within a routing group are connected by a high speed network

I have seen the text in the E2k reskit repeated more times than the
whitepaper.

There must be some stats out there!?

Leo

 I find it very hard to believe there are no stats available as yet, surely
 there are enough installations out there for MS to put their hands up and
 give some detail.
 
 Leo
 
  Just buttering you up so you'll buy me beer.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:55 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements
  
  
  While I appreciate your confidence, this is actually me just guessing.
  But since MS doesn't care to provide any hard numbers, I took a WAG at
  what I would do, were it my client's environment I was designing.
  
  M
  - Original Message -
  From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:47 PM
  Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
  
  
  Im Missy's case, Im betting on real life experience.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:45 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
  
  
  
  Based on what?  Gut feeling?  Or any actual stats?  The only reason I
  ask is that there's a distinct lack of any best practice or stats yet.
  My understanding is that, since SMTP is asynchronous, it can still work
  in low bandwidth environments without the timeouts associated with RPCs.
  So in theory, messages would just queue if there's not enough bandwidth.
  
  So the thinking then becomes that we only know how low we can go if we
  know what sort of traffic we're gonna get...
  
  Neil
  
  -Original Message-
  From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Posted At: 23 May 2002 17:11
  Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
  Conversation: Routing group bandwidth requirements
  Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements
  
  
  Well, it's more important that the bandwidth is highly available than it
  is for the bandwidth to be, say 10 Mb.  But I'd say that your low limit
  for connectivity would be somewhere around 128 Kbps - but would prefer
  to see 256 Kbps or better with an RG.
  
  Missy
  - Original Message -
  From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:55 AM
  Subject: Routing group bandwidth requirements
  
  
  What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a routing group. Are
  there any documented guidelines available?
  
  Regards
  Leo
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  *
  This email and any files transmitted with it are
  confidential and intended solely for the use of
  the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view
  or opinions presented are solely those of the
  author and do not necessarily represent those of
  Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies.
  
  If you have received this email in error, please
  contact our Support Desk immediately on
  01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

RE: Email Limits

2002-05-24 Thread Crumbaker, Ron

Its on USE Defaults.


Thank you,
 
Ron Crumbaker, MCP


-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Limits


Use Users and Computers on your E2K
Right click the user name select Properties
Then use the Exchange General tab
Click the Delivery Restrictions button

chuck 

-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Limits

OK, I need some help.  I have been looking for a setting in Exchange 2k,
and I can't seem to find it.

I am looking for the setting that limits the number of mail one person
can send out to another single mailbox.

What I am trying to do:

My HR Department posted a job online and have gotten a lot of
responses through emails to one mailbox. He is wanting to forward 1/3 of
the mail two other mailboxes so he doesn't have to screen all the emails
himself.

However, when I created a rule in Outlook to forward the mail to the
other mailboxes, it is only sending out 20.

I want to send out 200 from one mailbox to the other mailbox.


Or, if you have another solution that will work for me, I am open for
suggestions.



Thank you,

Ron Crumbaker, MCP
PC Systems Administrator
MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Bendall, Paul

Still on NT4 domain have not migrated to AD in any shape or form. It is
happening to multiple users across the two servers that are located in the
site. I am not actually in that office so I am attempting to get the exact
error message and will post it later.

Regards,

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2002 13:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar


I think he is still on a NT domain.


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Opening other users calendar


When it worked in the past were you in a NT4.0 domain setup and now that you
switched to AD it now fails?

- Original Message -
From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: Opening other users calendar


 Hi all,

 Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains

 Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to access another's
 calendar from Outlook using File open other users folder. In the past this
 has been successful but is now failing saying that the information store
is
 not available, however if you add a new user from the same domain with the
 same permissions on the calendar it opens without a problem. The Exchange
 servers are in a resource domain with a two-way trust to the user domain.
 Anyone got an ideas?

 TIA

 Paul


 --
 If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
 disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
 http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
 --


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Callan, Chris

Yeah, sure and what shall I tell my future in-laws about them wasting so
much money.

-Original Message-
From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Chris, go to the Exchange Conference instead

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I would ask my management to let me go, but I am getting married on the
12th, and it would interfere.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Where are my pants?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


What is the best AV software?


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


October 8-11 Anaheim, CA

right off the page

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Compton CA!!!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Does anyone know where MEC is this year?


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get sick
of me and shell out the funds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
 Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
 
 Martin Blackstone
 Director, Information Technologies
 Superior Access Insurance Services
 949.470.2111 x279
 
 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his 
 head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

Re: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Tony Hlabse

If the user logs into a NT4.0 domain and then tries to access other email
folders from others, It will not work unless you have an account setup in
the 2000 domain. I banged my head against this one for a while. If you add
the NT4 account and give it read rights it still won't work. You have to
give full rights but then he can see all of the users email folders not just
the he is trying to share. Its all or nothing. Trusts don't mean anything in
this case when sharing email folders in a mixed Nt4/2000 domain setup. The
only way for it to work is to give users an account on the 2000 side and
have them log in.

- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:36 AM
Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar


 I think he is still on a NT domain.


 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:33 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Opening other users calendar


 When it worked in the past were you in a NT4.0 domain setup and now that
you
 switched to AD it now fails?

 - Original Message -
 From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:49 AM
 Subject: Opening other users calendar


  Hi all,
 
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains
 
  Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to access another's
  calendar from Outlook using File open other users folder. In the past
this
  has been successful but is now failing saying that the information store
 is
  not available, however if you add a new user from the same domain with
the
  same permissions on the calendar it opens without a problem. The
Exchange
  servers are in a resource domain with a two-way trust to the user
domain.
  Anyone got an ideas?
 
  TIA
 
  Paul
 
 
  --
  If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
  disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
  http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
  --
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --

 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Message giving false reports?

2002-05-24 Thread Olds, Dominic

 Hi all
 Just a quick one hopefully. I have a user running Outlook XP and when he
 sends a meeting request to anyone on the GAL he gets the following message
 back from the system.
 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
 
   Subject:Stuart Atkin Interview
   Sent:   22/05/2002 13:38
 
 The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
 
   kuhn, patrick on 22/05/2002 13:38
 The recipient name is not recognized
   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Owen Williams
 Gr;l=OW-MAIL-020522123752Z-18695
 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:OWMAIL:OW-MAIL
 
   smart, paul on 22/05/2002 13:38
 The recipient name is not recognized
   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Owen Williams
 Gr;l=OW-MAIL-020522123752Z-18695
 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:OWMAIL:OW-MAIL
 
   harper, roger on 22/05/2002 13:38
 The recipient name is not recognized
   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Owen Williams
 Gr;l=OW-MAIL-020522123752Z-18695
 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:OWMAIL:OW-MAIL
 
 I have no record of any of these users in either of the recipients
 containers, not even hidden or custom recipients although I do know one of
 them used to be an employee until 6 months ago. His account was deleted 3
 months ago.
 I can find no reference to any of these recipients in his contacts folder
 either.
 Where should I be looking for this please.
 Exch 5.5 SP4 on Win2K SP2.
 Many thanks
 Dom

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Roger Seielstad

Sounds like either name resolution issues, or missing permissions on the
calendar folders.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:15 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 Still on NT4 domain have not migrated to AD in any shape or 
 form. It is
 happening to multiple users across the two servers that are 
 located in the
 site. I am not actually in that office so I am attempting to 
 get the exact
 error message and will post it later.
 
 Regards,
 
 Paul
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 24 May 2002 13:36
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 I think he is still on a NT domain.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:33 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 When it worked in the past were you in a NT4.0 domain setup 
 and now that you
 switched to AD it now fails?
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:49 AM
 Subject: Opening other users calendar
 
 
  Hi all,
 
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains
 
  Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to 
 access another's
  calendar from Outlook using File open other users folder. 
 In the past this
  has been successful but is now failing saying that the 
 information store
 is
  not available, however if you add a new user from the same 
 domain with the
  same permissions on the calendar it opens without a 
 problem. The Exchange
  servers are in a resource domain with a two-way trust to 
 the user domain.
  Anyone got an ideas?
 
  TIA
 
  Paul
 
 
  
 --
  If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
  disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
  http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
  
 --
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 --
 --
 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information intended only for the use of the 
 individual or
 entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this 
 message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  
 If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
 Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 ==
 ==
 ==
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
 disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
 http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
 --
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



OWA 2000 Folders View; preventing right click/delete ability

2002-05-24 Thread symantha . gates

Dear All:

I am doing some OWA2000 testing. In Folders View, you can right click and
delete Calendar, Task, Notes, Journal, etc. (everything except deleted
items, inbox, outbox, sent items). For example, if you right click the
calendar, it gets moved to the deleted items folder but when I click and
drag the calendar back under Mailbox, I don't have 100% of my
appointments.

I would like to prevent end users from being able to right click and
delete any of the folders that are available in the Folders View. Does
anyone know how to turn this off? I am assuming it will require a regedit.

Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Job opportunity

2002-05-24 Thread Mike O'Toole

Hi Evan,

Sorry this position is way beyond my abilities.

Mike

--- Evan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello Folks,
My name is Evan Lerman and I am a headhunter here in NYC. I am
 currently looking for an Exchange5.5 Architect. Someone who can
 architect
 an Exchange 5.5 network for a 1000 users. There will be an
 application
 that reads/writes data to Oracle. The Client may also emply web parts
 to
 present the outlook task and calendar interfaces and write that data
 to
 local OST outlook data files(personal calendar/tasks). The clients
 intention is to have a process running, or activity triggered from
 Oracle(on update, add of a record) that would send the changes to
 the
 Exchange copy of that record. To keep the two sets of the same data
 in
 Sync. A wrinkle arises in that on the Exchange side, a given record
 may be
 in mulitple users exchange contact folder. This is a contract
 position and
 I would welcome any phone calls to discuss this in further with you,
 if
 you have these skills. I look forward to hearing from you
 Best Regards,
 Evan
 212-944-4488(work)
 516-991-3908(cell)
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Simon Axon

I'm told they're on the Los Angeles Underground.  Not sure whether they
drive the trains or collect the tickets, but it's a good place to start.  

 -Original Message-
 From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:59 PM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 I'm still trying to contact the A-Team, anyone see their ad in the
 newspaper
 lately?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 Where are my pants?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:58 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 What is the best AV software?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 October 8-11 Anaheim, CA
 
 right off the page
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:26 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 Compton CA!!!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:24 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 Does anyone know where MEC is this year?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get
 sick
 of me and shell out the funds.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
  Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
  Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
  Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
  
  
  http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
  
  Martin Blackstone
  Director, Information Technologies
  Superior Access Insurance Services
  949.470.2111 x279
  
  -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his 
  head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 --
 --
 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
 entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
 Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 ==
 ==
 ==
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 --
 --
 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
 entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copy of this 

RE: Job opportunity

2002-05-24 Thread Brett Wesoloski

If it was SQL I could do it but Oracle nope way beyond my abilities as well.
Thanks for the offer however.  Wait how much does it pay, if enough I could
probably pretend I know what I am doing.

-Original Message-
From: Mike O'Toole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Job opportunity


Hi Evan,

Sorry this position is way beyond my abilities.

Mike

--- Evan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello Folks,
My name is Evan Lerman and I am a headhunter here in NYC. I am
 currently looking for an Exchange5.5 Architect. Someone who can
 architect
 an Exchange 5.5 network for a 1000 users. There will be an
 application
 that reads/writes data to Oracle. The Client may also emply web parts
 to
 present the outlook task and calendar interfaces and write that data
 to
 local OST outlook data files(personal calendar/tasks). The clients
 intention is to have a process running, or activity triggered from
 Oracle(on update, add of a record) that would send the changes to
 the
 Exchange copy of that record. To keep the two sets of the same data
 in
 Sync. A wrinkle arises in that on the Exchange side, a given record
 may be
 in mulitple users exchange contact folder. This is a contract
 position and
 I would welcome any phone calls to discuss this in further with you,
 if
 you have these skills. I look forward to hearing from you
 Best Regards,
 Evan
 212-944-4488(work)
 516-991-3908(cell)
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Bendall, Paul

I would generally agree with that, what I don't understand is why new
permissions work but old permissions do not even though they are exactly the
same access role.

In addition the domain is completely NT4 it is just the member server that
is W2K no AD, I know you did not mention this but other responses have.

Regards,

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2002 14:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar


Sounds like either name resolution issues, or missing permissions on the
calendar folders.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:15 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 Still on NT4 domain have not migrated to AD in any shape or 
 form. It is
 happening to multiple users across the two servers that are 
 located in the
 site. I am not actually in that office so I am attempting to 
 get the exact
 error message and will post it later.
 
 Regards,
 
 Paul
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 24 May 2002 13:36
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 I think he is still on a NT domain.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:33 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 When it worked in the past were you in a NT4.0 domain setup 
 and now that you
 switched to AD it now fails?
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:49 AM
 Subject: Opening other users calendar
 
 
  Hi all,
 
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains
 
  Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to 
 access another's
  calendar from Outlook using File open other users folder. 
 In the past this
  has been successful but is now failing saying that the 
 information store
 is
  not available, however if you add a new user from the same 
 domain with the
  same permissions on the calendar it opens without a 
 problem. The Exchange
  servers are in a resource domain with a two-way trust to 
 the user domain.
  Anyone got an ideas?
 
  TIA
 
  Paul
 
 
  
 --
  If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
  disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
  http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
  
 --
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 --
 --
 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information intended only for the use of the 
 individual or
 entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this 
 message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  
 If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
 Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 ==
 ==
 ==
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
 disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
 http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
 --
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   

RE: Message giving false reports?

2002-05-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim

Two reasons possible.
An orphaned object still exists for that address in the DL that they are
sending to or one of the users still has the user listed as a delegate.

-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message giving false reports?


 Hi all
 Just a quick one hopefully. I have a user running Outlook XP and when he
 sends a meeting request to anyone on the GAL he gets the following message
 back from the system.
 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
 
   Subject:Stuart Atkin Interview
   Sent:   22/05/2002 13:38
 
 The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
 
   kuhn, patrick on 22/05/2002 13:38
 The recipient name is not recognized
   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Owen Williams
 Gr;l=OW-MAIL-020522123752Z-18695
 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:OWMAIL:OW-MAIL
 
   smart, paul on 22/05/2002 13:38
 The recipient name is not recognized
   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Owen Williams
 Gr;l=OW-MAIL-020522123752Z-18695
 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:OWMAIL:OW-MAIL
 
   harper, roger on 22/05/2002 13:38
 The recipient name is not recognized
   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Owen Williams
 Gr;l=OW-MAIL-020522123752Z-18695
 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:OWMAIL:OW-MAIL
 
 I have no record of any of these users in either of the recipients
 containers, not even hidden or custom recipients although I do know one of
 them used to be an employee until 6 months ago. His account was deleted 3
 months ago.
 I can find no reference to any of these recipients in his contacts folder
 either.
 Where should I be looking for this please.
 Exch 5.5 SP4 on Win2K SP2.
 Many thanks
 Dom

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Bendall, Paul

Today, nothing has changed with the site, no additional servers, no WINS
change no changes at all that I am aware of.

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2002 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar


When did this start happening?


-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar


I would generally agree with that, what I don't understand is why new
permissions work but old permissions do not even though they are exactly the
same access role.

In addition the domain is completely NT4 it is just the member server that
is W2K no AD, I know you did not mention this but other responses have.

Regards,

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2002 14:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar


Sounds like either name resolution issues, or missing permissions on the
calendar folders.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:15 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 Still on NT4 domain have not migrated to AD in any shape or 
 form. It is
 happening to multiple users across the two servers that are 
 located in the
 site. I am not actually in that office so I am attempting to 
 get the exact
 error message and will post it later.
 
 Regards,
 
 Paul
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 24 May 2002 13:36
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 I think he is still on a NT domain.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:33 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 When it worked in the past were you in a NT4.0 domain setup 
 and now that you
 switched to AD it now fails?
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:49 AM
 Subject: Opening other users calendar
 
 
  Hi all,
 
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains
 
  Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to 
 access another's
  calendar from Outlook using File open other users folder. 
 In the past this
  has been successful but is now failing saying that the 
 information store
 is
  not available, however if you add a new user from the same 
 domain with the
  same permissions on the calendar it opens without a 
 problem. The Exchange
  servers are in a resource domain with a two-way trust to 
 the user domain.
  Anyone got an ideas?
 
  TIA
 
  Paul
 
 
  
 --
  If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
  disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
  http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
  
 --
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 --
 --
 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information intended only for the use of the 
 individual or
 entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this 
 message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  
 If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
 Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 ==
 ==
 ==
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

RE: Email Limits

2002-05-24 Thread Louis Joyce

In the mailbox, get him to create some folders under the inbox. Call each
folder by the name of the extra person he wants to check them. Share the
mailbox with the extra person(s) and then highlight a block of emails at a
time and move them into the designated folder as and when they are being
dealt with. 

Just an idea but works with us.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2002 13:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Limits


OK, I need some help.  I have been looking for a setting in Exchange 2k,
and I can't seem to find it.

I am looking for the setting that limits the number of mail one person
can send out to another single mailbox.

What I am trying to do:

My HR Department posted a job online and have gotten a lot of
responses through emails to one mailbox.
He is wanting to forward 1/3 of the mail two other mailboxes so he
doesn't have to screen all the emails himself.

However, when I created a rule in Outlook to forward the mail to the
other mailboxes, it is only sending out 20.

I want to send out 200 from one mailbox to the other mailbox.


Or, if you have another solution that will work for me, I am open for
suggestions.



Thank you,

Ron Crumbaker, MCP
PC Systems Administrator
MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Message giving false reports?

2002-05-24 Thread Louis Joyce

Delegates on the mailbox. This was covered at the beginning of the week.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2002 14:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message giving false reports?


 Hi all
 Just a quick one hopefully. I have a user running Outlook XP and when he
 sends a meeting request to anyone on the GAL he gets the following message
 back from the system.
 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
 
   Subject:Stuart Atkin Interview
   Sent:   22/05/2002 13:38
 
 The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
 
   kuhn, patrick on 22/05/2002 13:38
 The recipient name is not recognized
   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Owen Williams
 Gr;l=OW-MAIL-020522123752Z-18695
 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:OWMAIL:OW-MAIL
 
   smart, paul on 22/05/2002 13:38
 The recipient name is not recognized
   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Owen Williams
 Gr;l=OW-MAIL-020522123752Z-18695
 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:OWMAIL:OW-MAIL
 
   harper, roger on 22/05/2002 13:38
 The recipient name is not recognized
   The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Owen Williams
 Gr;l=OW-MAIL-020522123752Z-18695
 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:OWMAIL:OW-MAIL
 
 I have no record of any of these users in either of the recipients
 containers, not even hidden or custom recipients although I do know one of
 them used to be an employee until 6 months ago. His account was deleted 3
 months ago.
 I can find no reference to any of these recipients in his contacts folder
 either.
 Where should I be looking for this please.
 Exch 5.5 SP4 on Win2K SP2.
 Many thanks
 Dom

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Thomas Di Nardo

If they're paying to send you to MEC, they're not wasting their money.
Therefore you don't need to tell them.

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

Yeah, sure and what shall I tell my future in-laws about them wasting so
much money.

-Original Message-
From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Chris, go to the Exchange Conference instead

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I would ask my management to let me go, but I am getting married on the
12th, and it would interfere.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Where are my pants?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


What is the best AV software?


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


October 8-11 Anaheim, CA

right off the page

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Compton CA!!!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Does anyone know where MEC is this year?


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get
sick
of me and shell out the funds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
 Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
 
 Martin Blackstone
 Director, Information Technologies
 Superior Access Insurance Services
 949.470.2111 x279
 
 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his 
 head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Erik Sojka

That works on the Simpsons.

 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get
 sick of me and shell out the funds.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
  Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
  Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
  Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
  
  
  http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002 
  
  Martin Blackstone
  Director, Information Technologies
  Superior Access Insurance Services
  949.470.2111 x279
  
  -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he 
  sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: remote administration, archive options

2002-05-24 Thread Chris Scharff

What's the actual problem you are trying to solve?

 -Original Message-
 From: Brendan Kenny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:54 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: remote administration, archive options
 
 
 Is there any way to have autoarchive options on each folder 
 in all mailboxes in an orginazation set using some kind of 
 remote administration. We can set these options in the 
 initial setup but if the user creates a new folder then how 
 can we be sure it's set properly. Can we also set it so that 
 users can't change these settings?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Mellott, Bill

What Waste? 
1.) You'll have a good time at MEC
2.) Everybody at the wedding will have a good time due to the  invested
in all the accoutrement's .etc..
Ok provided you didn't skimp on the bar
3.) Maybe you can use the MEC expenditure as a write off thus justifying to
the new wife and family your fugal and sense of economic responsibility.
4.) You will have gotten the first big fight out of the way..thus paving a
secure and happy future for you and your new wife.

so your set... If really worried have your best man bring a life like card
board cutout 

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Yeah, sure and what shall I tell my future in-laws about them wasting so
much money.

-Original Message-
From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Chris, go to the Exchange Conference instead

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I would ask my management to let me go, but I am getting married on the
12th, and it would interfere.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Where are my pants?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


What is the best AV software?


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


October 8-11 Anaheim, CA

right off the page

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Compton CA!!!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Does anyone know where MEC is this year?


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get sick
of me and shell out the funds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
 Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
 
 Martin Blackstone
 Director, Information Technologies
 Superior Access Insurance Services
 949.470.2111 x279
 
 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his 
 head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To 

RE: Job opportunity

2002-05-24 Thread Chris Scharff

My rolodex contains a 1/2 dozen or more people who could handle the task...
Wonder what my cut would be.

 -Original Message-
 From: Evan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Job opportunity
 
 
 Hello Folks,
My name is Evan Lerman and I am a headhunter here in NYC. 
 I am currently looking for an Exchange5.5 Architect. Someone 
 who can architect an Exchange 5.5 network for a 1000 users. 
 There will be an application that reads/writes data to 
 Oracle. The Client may also emply web parts to present the 
 outlook task and calendar interfaces and write that data to 
 local OST outlook data files(personal calendar/tasks). The 
 clients intention is to have a process running, or activity 
 triggered from Oracle(on update, add of a record) that would 
 send the changes to the Exchange copy of that record. To 
 keep the two sets of the same data in Sync. A wrinkle arises 
 in that on the Exchange side, a given record may be in 
 mulitple users exchange contact folder. This is a contract 
 position and I would welcome any phone calls to discuss this 
 in further with you, if you have these skills. I look forward 
 to hearing from you Best Regards, Evan
 212-944-4488(work)
 516-991-3908(cell)
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Public Folders

2002-05-24 Thread Chris Scharff

Checked the FAQ?

 -Original Message-
 From: Cedric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Public Folders
 
 
 This may be a stupid question, how do you move public folders 
 from one exchange 2k server to another in the same domain. So 
 that the first server can be removed.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange 5.5 back up server, recreate mailboxes etc

2002-05-24 Thread Chris Scharff

Use DoubleTake.

 -Original Message-
 From: Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:38 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Exchange 5.5 back up server, recreate mailboxes etc
 
 
 Hi all,  Anyone have any thoughts on how do this.
 
 One Exchange server on local network, another server at a 
 remote site (connected by T1).  Remote site is for distaster 
 recovery, not being used for anything.  I can configure this 
 server however I want.
 
 All mail, public folders etc sit on local server.  In the 
 event of failure what is the best way to get the mailboxes 
 etc moved to remote site. I would like this to be a hot site 
 ready to be switched over.  I have 
 tested and replicate public folders ok, and directory info ok 
 (made remote server in teh same site (I could change this 
 however)), but dont know the best way for the mailboxes to be 
 rehomed over there and created for that matter,  anyone have 
 any ideas?  We really cant go to MS cluster right now and 
 redo the original server.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements

2002-05-24 Thread Chris Scharff

The right answer does vary quite a bit and those who have done the work in
production environments to gather the stats are, in general not terribly
willing to give away that expertise without a consulting engagement.

 -Original Message-
 From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
 
 
 I guess the point of it would be YMMV. Depending on your 
 traffic patterns, your need to regulate traffic between sites 
 by size and or times or to throttle the connection. With E2K 
 you put in your best guess and if it's not what you need, 
 it's not that hard to change it. We have two main data 
 centers with dual OC3's between them. I was going to have all 
 the servers in one great big routing group and if the network 
 folks whine about all the chatter, then I'll split them in two.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:39 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
 
 
 Exchange 2000 resource kit chapter 31 Reliable always on 
 connectivity is more important that high bandwdth this is 
 the only reference I could find.
 
 There is also a white paper from MS but all it says is 
 Generally, servers within a routing group are connected by a 
 high speed network
 
 I have seen the text in the E2k reskit repeated more times 
 than the whitepaper.
 
 There must be some stats out there!?
 
 Leo
 
  I find it very hard to believe there are no stats available as yet, 
  surely there are enough installations out there for MS to put their 
  hands up and give some detail.
  
  Leo
  
   Just buttering you up so you'll buy me beer.
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:55 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements
   
   
   While I appreciate your confidence, this is actually me just 
   guessing. But since MS doesn't care to provide any hard 
 numbers, I 
   took a WAG at what I would do, were it my client's 
 environment I was 
   designing.
   
   M
   - Original Message -
   From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:47 PM
   Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
   
   
   Im Missy's case, Im betting on real life experience.
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:45 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
   
   
   
   Based on what?  Gut feeling?  Or any actual stats?  The 
 only reason 
   I ask is that there's a distinct lack of any best 
 practice or stats 
   yet. My understanding is that, since SMTP is asynchronous, it can 
   still work in low bandwidth environments without the timeouts 
   associated with RPCs. So in theory, messages would just queue if 
   there's not enough bandwidth.
   
   So the thinking then becomes that we only know how low we 
 can go if 
   we know what sort of traffic we're gonna get...
   
   Neil
   
   -Original Message-
   From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Posted At: 23 
   May 2002 17:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
   Conversation: Routing group bandwidth requirements
   Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements
   
   
   Well, it's more important that the bandwidth is highly available 
   than it is for the bandwidth to be, say 10 Mb.  But I'd say that 
   your low limit for connectivity would be somewhere around 
 128 Kbps - 
   but would prefer to see 256 Kbps or better with an RG.
   
   Missy
   - Original Message -
   From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:55 AM
   Subject: Routing group bandwidth requirements
   
   
   What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a 
 routing group. 
   Are there any documented guidelines available?
   
   Regards
   Leo
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   *
   This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
   intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
   addressed. Any view or opinions 

RE: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Chris Scharff

Sounds like a name resolution issue. Target mailbox been moved, or modified
in any way?

 -Original Message-
 From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 6:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 Hi all,
 
 Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains
 
 Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to 
 access another's calendar from Outlook using File open other 
 users folder. In the past this has been successful but is now 
 failing saying that the information store is not available, 
 however if you add a new user from the same domain with the 
 same permissions on the calendar it opens without a problem. 
 The Exchange servers are in a resource domain with a two-way 
 trust to the user domain. Anyone got an ideas?
 
 TIA
 
 Paul
 
 
 --
 If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
 disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
 http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
 --
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Public Folders

2002-05-24 Thread Pennell, Ronald B.

How about moving public folders between 2 sites.  I have checked the Q
article and sounds
OK, but, anyone actually move the folders before?  Any problems?

Ron

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders


Checked the FAQ?

 -Original Message-
 From: Cedric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Public Folders
 
 
 This may be a stupid question, how do you move public folders 
 from one exchange 2k server to another in the same domain. So 
 that the first server can be removed.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Email Limits

2002-05-24 Thread Chris Scharff

Sounds like what you want is a workflow application. I can suggest a number
of capable developers who'd be happy to build one to spec or you could pick
up an off the shelf workflow solution.. I believe several are listed at
www.mail-resources.com.

 -Original Message-
 From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:58 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Email Limits
 
 
 OK, I need some help.  I have been looking for a setting in 
 Exchange 2k, and I can't seem to find it.
 
 I am looking for the setting that limits the number of mail 
 one person can send out to another single mailbox.
 
 What I am trying to do:
 
 My HR Department posted a job online and have gotten a 
 lot of responses through emails to one mailbox. He is wanting 
 to forward 1/3 of the mail two other mailboxes so he doesn't 
 have to screen all the emails himself.
 
 However, when I created a rule in Outlook to forward the mail 
 to the other mailboxes, it is only sending out 20.
 
 I want to send out 200 from one mailbox to the other mailbox.
 
 
 Or, if you have another solution that will work for me, I am 
 open for suggestions.
 
 
 
 Thank you,
 
 Ron Crumbaker, MCP
 PC Systems Administrator
 MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Office 270-685-6381
 Fax 270-685-6212
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Erik Sojka

Or like Jerry Seinfeld says, the groom and wedding party are all wearing
identical tuxes.  If the groom isn't there, everyone else can just take one
step to the left, and the ceremony continues...

 -Original Message-
 From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:04 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 What Waste? 
 1.) You'll have a good time at MEC
 2.) Everybody at the wedding will have a good time due to the 
  invested
 in all the accoutrement's .etc..
 Ok provided you didn't skimp on the bar
 3.) Maybe you can use the MEC expenditure as a write off thus 
 justifying to
 the new wife and family your fugal and sense of economic 
 responsibility.
 4.) You will have gotten the first big fight out of the 
 way..thus paving a
 secure and happy future for you and your new wife.
 
 so your set... If really worried have your best man bring a 
 life like card
 board cutout 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:20 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 Yeah, sure and what shall I tell my future in-laws about them 
 wasting so
 much money.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:57 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 Chris, go to the Exchange Conference instead
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:44 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 I would ask my management to let me go, but I am getting 
 married on the
 12th, and it would interfere.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 Where are my pants?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:58 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 What is the best AV software?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 October 8-11 Anaheim, CA
 
 right off the page
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:26 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 Compton CA!!!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:24 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 Does anyone know where MEC is this year?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss 
 will get sick
 of me and shell out the funds.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
  Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
  Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
  Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
  
  
  http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
  
  Martin Blackstone
  Director, Information Technologies
  Superior Access Insurance Services
  949.470.2111 x279
  
  -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he 
 sticks his 
  head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 --
 --
 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information intended only for the use of the 
 individual or
 entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this 
 message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  
 If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
 Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 

RE: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Bendall, Paul

Hi Chris,

All mailboxes both target and source have been moved from old Exchange
servers to new Exchange server using move mailbox and following the Ed
Crowley method. However, that process was about a month ago and the
calendars have been working past the move time but have stopped today. The
only thing I can think of is the PDC in the resource domain may have
changed, it is not under my control. I am scheduling a reboot of the
Exchange servers and BDC in our area to see if this has any affect, I will
report back the result on Monday.

Thanks for everyone's response to date,

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2002 16:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar


Sounds like a name resolution issue. Target mailbox been moved, or modified
in any way?

 -Original Message-
 From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 6:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 Hi all,
 
 Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains
 
 Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to 
 access another's calendar from Outlook using File open other 
 users folder. In the past this has been successful but is now 
 failing saying that the information store is not available, 
 however if you add a new user from the same domain with the 
 same permissions on the calendar it opens without a problem. 
 The Exchange servers are in a resource domain with a two-way 
 trust to the user domain. Anyone got an ideas?
 
 TIA
 
 Paul
 
 
 --
 If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
 disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
 http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
 --
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Opening other users calendar

2002-05-24 Thread Chris Scharff

Since Exchange doesn't really rely on NT permissions for folder access
unless the access was granted as owner permissions through the Exchange
admin, I don't believe it's likely an NT permissions issue. I think that if
you either a. create a new profile for these users on their machine named
'completely new profile' or b. open the folder by going through the process
of File | Open Users Folder and selecting them from the GAL anew.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

Nana korobi, ya oki.

 -Original Message-
 From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:31 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 Hi Chris,
 
 All mailboxes both target and source have been moved from old 
 Exchange servers to new Exchange server using move mailbox 
 and following the Ed Crowley method. However, that process 
 was about a month ago and the calendars have been working 
 past the move time but have stopped today. The only thing I 
 can think of is the PDC in the resource domain may have 
 changed, it is not under my control. I am scheduling a reboot 
 of the Exchange servers and BDC in our area to see if this 
 has any affect, I will report back the result on Monday.
 
 Thanks for everyone's response to date,
 
 Paul
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 24 May 2002 16:13
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar
 
 
 Sounds like a name resolution issue. Target mailbox been 
 moved, or modified in any way?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 6:50 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Opening other users calendar
  
  
  Hi all,
  
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains
  
  Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to
  access another's calendar from Outlook using File open other 
  users folder. In the past this has been successful but is now 
  failing saying that the information store is not available, 
  however if you add a new user from the same domain with the 
  same permissions on the calendar it opens without a problem. 
  The Exchange servers are in a resource domain with a two-way 
  trust to the user domain. Anyone got an ideas?
  
  TIA
  
  Paul
  
  
  
 --
  If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
  disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
  http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
  
 --
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail 
 disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
 http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
 --
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Speed

2002-05-24 Thread East, Bill

Yo.

If you back off a step, are there other options apart from consolidating the
9 Exchange servers into 1? Can you move the smaller offices onto the central
server but leave servers at the bigger sites? Can you have several hub
sites, where small local offices have dedicated lines into large local
offices (design it right and you'll save on telco charges).

For what it is worth, we have one central server for several remote sites,
each of which has between 8 and 16 channels of a T. But we also run a great
deal of other traffic over those lines, and since all our sites are within
city limits the line costs are minimal.

Centralization
Is a bean-counter's delight
But autumn's leaves disperse

-- 
be - MOS



Avoid gunfire in the bathroom tonight.

 -Original Message-
 From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:24 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Speed
 
 
 I'm new to this organization. Currently we have nine Exchange 
 5.5 servers
 (450 users) scattered around the country. They're all connected to the
 Exchange server at our headquarters in Philadelphia. All 
 Internet mail goes
 through the Philadelphia connection. All the remote sites are 
 connected to
 us, through the Internet, at various speeds, the fastest 
 being some level of
 DSL.
 
 We're just at the beginning stages of moving our NT- and 
 Exchange 5.5-based
 network to Win2k and Ex2k. One of the ideas being considered is to
 consolidate the 9 different Exchange servers into one server housed in
 Philadelphia. So my questions are: 1. What is the minimum 
 speed you would
 suggest the remote sites be connected to us? (They'll be 
 using Outlook.) 2.
 Is it a good idea?
 
 We're trying to lower the administrative overhead, and 
 simplify the network.
 
 Thanks for your input,
 Rob
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Rob Moore, MCSE
 American Friends Service Committee
 IT Department
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Job opportunity

2002-05-24 Thread Andrey Fyodorov

Fugget 5.5, look into the future

-Original Message-
From: Evan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Job opportunity


Hello Folks,
   My name is Evan Lerman and I am a headhunter here in NYC. I am
currently looking for an Exchange5.5 Architect. Someone who can architect
an Exchange 5.5 network for a 1000 users. There will be an application
that reads/writes data to Oracle. The Client may also emply web parts to
present the outlook task and calendar interfaces and write that data to
local OST outlook data files(personal calendar/tasks). The clients
intention is to have a process running, or activity triggered from
Oracle(on update, add of a record) that would send the changes to the
Exchange copy of that record. To keep the two sets of the same data in
Sync. A wrinkle arises in that on the Exchange side, a given record may be
in mulitple users exchange contact folder. This is a contract position and
I would welcome any phone calls to discuss this in further with you, if
you have these skills. I look forward to hearing from you
Best Regards,
Evan
212-944-4488(work)
516-991-3908(cell)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Job opportunity

2002-05-24 Thread Andrey Fyodorov

Why do people invent such perversions?

-Original Message-
From: Evan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Job opportunity


Hello Folks,
   My name is Evan Lerman and I am a headhunter here in NYC. I am
currently looking for an Exchange5.5 Architect. Someone who can architect
an Exchange 5.5 network for a 1000 users. There will be an application
that reads/writes data to Oracle. The Client may also emply web parts to
present the outlook task and calendar interfaces and write that data to
local OST outlook data files(personal calendar/tasks). The clients
intention is to have a process running, or activity triggered from
Oracle(on update, add of a record) that would send the changes to the
Exchange copy of that record. To keep the two sets of the same data in
Sync. A wrinkle arises in that on the Exchange side, a given record may be
in mulitple users exchange contact folder. This is a contract position and
I would welcome any phone calls to discuss this in further with you, if
you have these skills. I look forward to hearing from you
Best Regards,
Evan
212-944-4488(work)
516-991-3908(cell)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Mind gone blank - easy question for a Friday!

2002-05-24 Thread Andrey Fyodorov

That's how I am doing it. Each front-end has an SMTP Connector defined
around it (local bridgehead) and the first SMTP Connector has address space
= 1, while the other one = 2

It would be really nice if MS allowed to define local bridgehead based on
the WLBS name of the WLBS-ed front-ends :)

I am not sure if this will rowk too, maybe it will (but I can't stop
production to test this right now)
- have one SMTP connector based on both front-ends as local bridgeheads.  I
remember doing it in the past and I remember that I lost some flexibility





-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mind gone blank - easy question for a Friday!


My mind has gone blank for the moment sorry folks this is a silly question
but

We have many exchange 2000 servers and we want two dedicated IMS servers
one as a standby in case the other fails (as we used to on Exchange 5.5).

How do would you set this up?

My guess is .

Mailbox servers with no changes to the virtual smtp server
Two IMS servers with an smtp connector each with the address space of *,
one with a cost of 1 and the other server with a cost of 10.
Each SMTP connector lists itself as the local bridgehead and the same
smart host record.

Is this correct?

Regards
Leo 
(Friday at last)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: RGC and SMTP Connectors Dilemma!!!

2002-05-24 Thread Andrey Fyodorov

This looks like a qestion from Exchange test :)

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Pike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RGC and SMTP Connectors Dilemma!!!


Hi all,

I'm having a slight problem and thought it time to ask the experts!!  

I support an Exchange 2000 organisation consisting of 3 routing groups (RG)
connected in a mesh topography by 3 RGC.

RG A is connected to B with a cost of 10.  RG A also has a SMTP connector to
an up stream smart host with a cost of 1 (* address space). RG A connects
to RG C with a cost of 10 and RG B connects to RG C with a cost of 40. 

There are two different company name spaces within this organization.  RG A
and C host servers for the 1st name space and RG B for the second (I hope
that makes sense!!) 

With the single SMTP connector all works well, external mail is routed out
correctly.  My problems start when I try to add an additional SMTP connector
to RG B this time forwarding to a different up steam smart host. Cost and
address space are the same as 1st SMTP connector.  

The different companies require that all external mail from RG A and C must
explicitly use the SMTP connector on RG A and external mail from RG B must
explicitly use the new SMTP connector on RG B because outbound mail picks up
a company banner from the smart hosts.

During tests all worked OK but under load in a live environment a proportion
of outbound external mail from the first SMTP connector was routed to the
internet via the 2nd SMTP connector, thus picking up the wrong banner.

Is there anyway under the current structure I can achieve the different
company requirements?

Many thanks!!!

Andrew Pike 
UK



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: RGC and SMTP Connectors Dilemma!!!

2002-05-24 Thread Andrey Fyodorov

There is a little checkbox on STMP connector that allows you to restict it
to the routing group only. Have you tried it?

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Pike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RGC and SMTP Connectors Dilemma!!!


Hi all,

I'm having a slight problem and thought it time to ask the experts!!  

I support an Exchange 2000 organisation consisting of 3 routing groups (RG)
connected in a mesh topography by 3 RGC.

RG A is connected to B with a cost of 10.  RG A also has a SMTP connector to
an up stream smart host with a cost of 1 (* address space). RG A connects
to RG C with a cost of 10 and RG B connects to RG C with a cost of 40. 

There are two different company name spaces within this organization.  RG A
and C host servers for the 1st name space and RG B for the second (I hope
that makes sense!!) 

With the single SMTP connector all works well, external mail is routed out
correctly.  My problems start when I try to add an additional SMTP connector
to RG B this time forwarding to a different up steam smart host. Cost and
address space are the same as 1st SMTP connector.  

The different companies require that all external mail from RG A and C must
explicitly use the SMTP connector on RG A and external mail from RG B must
explicitly use the new SMTP connector on RG B because outbound mail picks up
a company banner from the smart hosts.

During tests all worked OK but under load in a live environment a proportion
of outbound external mail from the first SMTP connector was routed to the
internet via the 2nd SMTP connector, thus picking up the wrong banner.

Is there anyway under the current structure I can achieve the different
company requirements?

Many thanks!!!

Andrew Pike 
UK



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Job opportunity

2002-05-24 Thread Andrey Fyodorov

It's 70 around where I live.

anyway, are you trying to subliminally say something with that number 55? :)

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Job opportunity


Why do the Italians develop a car that can do 175+ MHP on American roads
where the speed limit is 55 MPH?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal.
Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Job opportunity


Why do people invent such perversions?

-Original Message-
From: Evan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Job opportunity


Hello Folks,
   My name is Evan Lerman and I am a headhunter here in NYC. I am
currently looking for an Exchange5.5 Architect. Someone who can architect
an Exchange 5.5 network for a 1000 users. There will be an application
that reads/writes data to Oracle. The Client may also emply web parts to
present the outlook task and calendar interfaces and write that data to
local OST outlook data files(personal calendar/tasks). The clients
intention is to have a process running, or activity triggered from
Oracle(on update, add of a record) that would send the changes to the
Exchange copy of that record. To keep the two sets of the same data in
Sync. A wrinkle arises in that on the Exchange side, a given record may be
in mulitple users exchange contact folder. This is a contract position and
I would welcome any phone calls to discuss this in further with you, if
you have these skills. I look forward to hearing from you
Best Regards,
Evan
212-944-4488(work)
516-991-3908(cell)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Job opportunity

2002-05-24 Thread Chinnery Paul

Maybe because they don't just sell them in the US?

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Job opportunity


Why do the Italians develop a car that can do 175+ MHP on American roads
where the speed limit is 55 MPH?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal.
Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Job opportunity


Why do people invent such perversions?

-Original Message-
From: Evan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Job opportunity


Hello Folks,
   My name is Evan Lerman and I am a headhunter here in NYC. I am
currently looking for an Exchange5.5 Architect. Someone who can architect
an Exchange 5.5 network for a 1000 users. There will be an application
that reads/writes data to Oracle. The Client may also emply web parts to
present the outlook task and calendar interfaces and write that data to
local OST outlook data files(personal calendar/tasks). The clients
intention is to have a process running, or activity triggered from
Oracle(on update, add of a record) that would send the changes to the
Exchange copy of that record. To keep the two sets of the same data in
Sync. A wrinkle arises in that on the Exchange side, a given record may be
in mulitple users exchange contact folder. This is a contract position and
I would welcome any phone calls to discuss this in further with you, if
you have these skills. I look forward to hearing from you
Best Regards,
Evan
212-944-4488(work)
516-991-3908(cell)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Moving public folders from site a to site b

2002-05-24 Thread Pennell, Ronald B.

I have read the Q article on how to move the folders...  It says to create
a .pst file from a client (outlook) in site a  and import that .pst file via
a client (outlook) in site b.  

Question: How do you get them into the public folders so everyone can see
in site b.

Ron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Large IS DB

2002-05-24 Thread paragon400

Fellow exchange admins\engineers\gurus,

Does anyone have any suggestions for this situation?

Config:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
WinNT 4.0 SP6
Priv.edb = 45GB
Deleted Item Cache = 11.5 GB
Deleted Item retention was 7 days, but in an effort to fix this I set it
to 3 days to see if it would make a difference.  The DIC (ok..I can see
the jokes coming, but hey.it's Friday) was 15 GB and after the change it
shrunk to 11.5 GB after a couple days.
Whitespace = Event ID's 1221 state that on average there is 2GB of
whitespace

When I look at the mailbox sizes through Exchange Admin and do a dump to
CSV it totals out to be about 7 GB, yet the Priv is 45 GB.  Backups are
taking extremely long and I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestions as
to what, if any, the problem could be here.  We have done a number of IS
compresses and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of
the reported whitespace).  But with what Exchange Admin is reporting I
am concerned.

Thanks for any suggestions and for those in the states..have a good
relaxing holiday.


Best regards,
Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Etts, Russell

Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have a
delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your boss
comes to you and asks you to post something on that great newsgroup you're
on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ? Your
insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not borne out
by the many many people that regularly comment on how this list has helped
them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at my
expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being silly.
I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look for
another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the 
 flu from all the hugging.
 e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list. It's
down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving me up
the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange client problem

2002-05-24 Thread Etts, Russell

Hi there

I know that when I create a new user, I get the error that tells me the
users is not found.  It does take about 15 minutes for everything to
replicate.  If I move a user from 5.5, it could take longer.

HTH

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange client problem


I can use OWA,POP3,IMAP,SMTP but i can not use exchange client.
I have Exchange 2k, fresh install, and I use Outlook 2000

Laurentiu

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Mellott, Bill

Me...I learned about fisk taco's
and some exchange stuff too.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have a
delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your boss
comes to you and asks you to post something on that great newsgroup you're
on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ? Your
insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not borne out
by the many many people that regularly comment on how this list has helped
them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at my
expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being silly.
I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look for
another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the 
 flu from all the hugging.
 e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list. It's
down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving me up
the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   

RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Mitchell Mike

that I believe is fish tacos.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Me...I learned about fisk taco's
and some exchange stuff too.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have a
delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your boss
comes to you and asks you to post something on that great newsgroup you're
on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ? Your
insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not borne out
by the many many people that regularly comment on how this list has helped
them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at my
expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being silly.
I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look for
another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the 
 flu from all the hugging.
 e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list. It's
down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving me up
the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Bob Sadler

He didn't say he learned to spell :P



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


that I believe is fish tacos.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Me...I learned about fisk taco's
and some exchange stuff too.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have
a delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your
boss comes to you and asks you to post something on that great
newsgroup you're on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ?
Your insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not
borne out by the many many people that regularly comment on how this
list has helped them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at
my expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my
self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being
silly. I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look
for another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the
 flu from all the hugging.
 e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just
prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list.
It's
down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving
me up
the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: 

RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Mellott, Bill

And! I'm learning to spell too!

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


that I believe is fish tacos.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Me...I learned about fisk taco's
and some exchange stuff too.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have a
delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your boss
comes to you and asks you to post something on that great newsgroup you're
on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ? Your
insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not borne out
by the many many people that regularly comment on how this list has helped
them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at my
expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being silly.
I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look for
another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the 
 flu from all the hugging.
 e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list. It's
down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving me up
the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Bowles, John L.

Ive learned that everyone on this list is right and my boss is wrong :)

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support  Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


And! I'm learning to spell too!

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


that I believe is fish tacos.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Me...I learned about fisk taco's
and some exchange stuff too.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have
a delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your
boss comes to you and asks you to post something on that great
newsgroup you're on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ?
Your insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not
borne out by the many many people that regularly comment on how this
list has helped them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at
my expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my
self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being
silly. I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look
for another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the
 flu from all the hugging.
 e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just
prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list.
It's
down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving
me up
the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 

RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Kevin Miller

You are now very wise.

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Ive learned that everyone on this list is right and my boss is wrong :)

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support  Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


And! I'm learning to spell too!

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


that I believe is fish tacos.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Me...I learned about fisk taco's
and some exchange stuff too.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have
a delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your
boss comes to you and asks you to post something on that great
newsgroup you're on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ?
Your insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not
borne out by the many many people that regularly comment on how this
list has helped them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at
my expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my
self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being
silly. I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look
for another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the flu from

 all the hugging. e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just
prefer to have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the
What is ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list.
It's down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving
me up the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Martin Blackstone

Fsk tacos

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


that I believe is fish tacos.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Me...I learned about fisk taco's
and some exchange stuff too.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have a
delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your boss
comes to you and asks you to post something on that great newsgroup you're
on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ? Your
insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not borne out
by the many many people that regularly comment on how this list has helped
them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at my
expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being silly.
I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look for
another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the
 flu from all the hugging.
 e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list. It's
down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving me up
the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Kevin Miller

I wish!!!

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


And! I'm learning to spell too!

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


that I believe is fish tacos.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Me...I learned about fisk taco's
and some exchange stuff too.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have
a delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your
boss comes to you and asks you to post something on that great
newsgroup you're on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ?
Your insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not
borne out by the many many people that regularly comment on how this
list has helped them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at
my expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my
self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being
silly. I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look
for another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the
 flu from all the hugging.
 e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just
prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list.
It's
down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving
me up
the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Large IS DB

2002-05-24 Thread Kevin Miller

Do you have any hidden mailboxes that are not showing up in your
reports? Ever clean out he Admin box? Or the AV box? 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Large IS DB


Fellow exchange admins\engineers\gurus,

Does anyone have any suggestions for this situation?

Config:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
WinNT 4.0 SP6
Priv.edb = 45GB
Deleted Item Cache = 11.5 GB
Deleted Item retention was 7 days, but in an effort to fix this I set it
to 3 days to see if it would make a difference.  The DIC (ok..I can see
the jokes coming, but hey.it's Friday) was 15 GB and after the change it
shrunk to 11.5 GB after a couple days. Whitespace = Event ID's 1221
state that on average there is 2GB of whitespace

When I look at the mailbox sizes through Exchange Admin and do a dump to
CSV it totals out to be about 7 GB, yet the Priv is 45 GB.  Backups are
taking extremely long and I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestions as
to what, if any, the problem could be here.  We have done a number of IS
compresses and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of
the reported whitespace).  But with what Exchange Admin is reporting I
am concerned.

Thanks for any suggestions and for those in the states..have a good
relaxing holiday.


Best regards,
Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Mellott, Bill

Hey that cut's me deep shreck

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


I wish!!!

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


And! I'm learning to spell too!

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


that I believe is fish tacos.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Me...I learned about fisk taco's
and some exchange stuff too.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have
a delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your
boss comes to you and asks you to post something on that great
newsgroup you're on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ?
Your insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not
borne out by the many many people that regularly comment on how this
list has helped them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at
my expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my
self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being
silly. I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look
for another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the
 flu from all the hugging.
 e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just
prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list.
It's
down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving
me up
the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting 

RE: Large IS DB

2002-05-24 Thread Steve

The report is the dump of the total size of all mailboxes (as seen from
Exchange Admin).  There are some large mailboxes on the server, but the
total space taken up by both hidden and visible mailboxes does not total
more then 8 GBthus my delima.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Do you have any hidden mailboxes that are not showing up in your
reports? Ever clean out he Admin box? Or the AV box? 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Large IS DB


Fellow exchange admins\engineers\gurus,

Does anyone have any suggestions for this situation?

Config:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
WinNT 4.0 SP6
Priv.edb = 45GB
Deleted Item Cache = 11.5 GB
Deleted Item retention was 7 days, but in an effort to fix this I set it
to 3 days to see if it would make a difference.  The DIC (ok..I can see
the jokes coming, but hey.it's Friday) was 15 GB and after the change it
shrunk to 11.5 GB after a couple days. Whitespace = Event ID's 1221
state that on average there is 2GB of whitespace

When I look at the mailbox sizes through Exchange Admin and do a dump to
CSV it totals out to be about 7 GB, yet the Priv is 45 GB.  Backups are
taking extremely long and I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestions as
to what, if any, the problem could be here.  We have done a number of IS
compresses and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of
the reported whitespace).  But with what Exchange Admin is reporting I
am concerned.

Thanks for any suggestions and for those in the states..have a good
relaxing holiday.


Best regards,
Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox

2002-05-24 Thread Exchange Discussions

Hi all,

I'm hoping you can assist me in just how to recover an event script that is
associated with a particular mailbox.  It seems the script just disappeared
and the developer did not have a copy.  

The mailbox sits on server A and the script was added to it through the
Agents tab.  The script executes on Server B.  Presently, I'm making an
assumption that restoring the mailbox from server A, I should also get the
script.

Is this correct?

Thanks in advance,
Louise

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Large IS DB

2002-05-24 Thread Mark Arnold ()

Yeah, the place where you see the sizes of the mailboxes doesn't have the option to 
view hidden, it shows all things. It's only a guide but isn't usually that far out.
I know you've said you're reporting 2GB of white space but have you tried an offline 
defrag, in my experience you'll gain more than it reports as spare.

-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 24 May 2002 19:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB

The report is the dump of the total size of all mailboxes (as seen from
Exchange Admin).  There are some large mailboxes on the server, but the
total space taken up by both hidden and visible mailboxes does not total
more then 8 GBthus my delima.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Do you have any hidden mailboxes that are not showing up in your
reports? Ever clean out he Admin box? Or the AV box? 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Large IS DB


Fellow exchange admins\engineers\gurus,

Does anyone have any suggestions for this situation?

Config:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
WinNT 4.0 SP6
Priv.edb = 45GB
Deleted Item Cache = 11.5 GB
Deleted Item retention was 7 days, but in an effort to fix this I set it
to 3 days to see if it would make a difference.  The DIC (ok..I can see
the jokes coming, but hey.it's Friday) was 15 GB and after the change it
shrunk to 11.5 GB after a couple days. Whitespace = Event ID's 1221
state that on average there is 2GB of whitespace

When I look at the mailbox sizes through Exchange Admin and do a dump to
CSV it totals out to be about 7 GB, yet the Priv is 45 GB.  Backups are
taking extremely long and I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestions as
to what, if any, the problem could be here.  We have done a number of IS
compresses and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of
the reported whitespace).  But with what Exchange Admin is reporting I
am concerned.

Thanks for any suggestions and for those in the states..have a good
relaxing holiday.


Best regards,
Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

2002-05-24 Thread Ken . Powell

While on the topic, true fish tacos are now making it to the Pacific
Northwest. Rubio's has landed in Portland and will soon make it across the
river to Vancouver. 

I was just on the MEC page and they mentioned  full-range of food. Will
that include our beloved fish tacos? If so, that should be added under the
Benefit of Attending link.

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

that I believe is fish tacos.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Me...I learned about fisk taco's
and some exchange stuff too.

-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


Hi there

I agree.  Yes, there is allot of goofing around - but that is why I have a
delete key on the keyboard.

I normally just ask questions - I'm still learning.  But the day your boss
comes to you and asks you to post something on that great newsgroup you're
on, it's worth it's weight in gold :).

I hope you stay.  I think you'll find there is allot of very useful
information here.

Thanks

Russell



-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?



  However, 100% of _your_ mail is allowed to be off-topic bitching ? Your
insulting characterizations of the membership of this list is not borne out
by the many many people that regularly comment on how this list has helped
them become a better Exchange professionals. 
  
  I am one of those.  If someone wants to flame me or have some fun at my
expense, it's OK. The purpose of my subscription is to maintain the
investment my company has made in Exchange, not to maintain my self-esteem. 

  Jim Helfer
  WTW Architects
  Pittsburgh PA 
  
 
-Original Mes
sage-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?


This is precisely what I'm talking about.  I don't have a problem having
fun, but I do have a problem when 70% of list traffic is people being silly.
I apologize that my needs do not fit into your sandbox; I'll look for
another list.  Thanks for being candid with me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 The carebear list shut down. Too many people were getting the 
 flu from all the hugging.
 e
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
 
 
 Your solution can be found at the bottom of your email: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is more knowledge on this list than you can imagine. We just prefer to
have a bit of fun during the day too. It helps make up for the What is
ScanMail and what is it used for? Questions.

If you don't like it, request a refund and go try the CareBears list. It's
down the road and to the left.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Other Exchange mailing lists?

Can someone please recommend an Exchange mailing list with more skilled
professionals and less comedians?  All this useless chatter is driving me up
the wall ...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: Large IS DB

2002-05-24 Thread paragon400

We have done a number of IS compresses to try to resolve it and only
gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of the reported
whitespace in the event logs).

-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Yeah, the place where you see the sizes of the mailboxes doesn't have
the option to view hidden, it shows all things. It's only a guide but
isn't usually that far out. I know you've said you're reporting 2GB of
white space but have you tried an offline defrag, in my experience
you'll gain more than it reports as spare.

-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 24 May 2002 19:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB

The report is the dump of the total size of all mailboxes (as seen from
Exchange Admin).  There are some large mailboxes on the server, but the
total space taken up by both hidden and visible mailboxes does not total
more then 8 GBthus my delima.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Do you have any hidden mailboxes that are not showing up in your
reports? Ever clean out he Admin box? Or the AV box? 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Large IS DB


Fellow exchange admins\engineers\gurus,

Does anyone have any suggestions for this situation?

Config:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
WinNT 4.0 SP6
Priv.edb = 45GB
Deleted Item Cache = 11.5 GB
Deleted Item retention was 7 days, but in an effort to fix this I set it
to 3 days to see if it would make a difference.  The DIC (ok..I can see
the jokes coming, but hey.it's Friday) was 15 GB and after the change it
shrunk to 11.5 GB after a couple days. Whitespace = Event ID's 1221
state that on average there is 2GB of whitespace

When I look at the mailbox sizes through Exchange Admin and do a dump to
CSV it totals out to be about 7 GB, yet the Priv is 45 GB.  Backups are
taking extremely long and I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestions as
to what, if any, the problem could be here.  We have done a number of IS
compresses and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of
the reported whitespace).  But with what Exchange Admin is reporting I
am concerned.

Thanks for any suggestions and for those in the states..have a good
relaxing holiday.


Best regards,
Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Darcy Adams

The strategy here is to register *way* in advance to avoid the end of year we can't 
spend any money so you can't go panic.

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get
sick of me and shell out the funds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
 Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002 
 
 Martin Blackstone
 Director, Information Technologies
 Superior Access Insurance Services
 949.470.2111 x279
 
 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he 
 sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cannot delete form

2002-05-24 Thread Exchange Forum

Hello all:

We are running Exchange 5.5, SP 4 on W2K, SP2.  A member of my team
published a form to a public folder.  The form was called New Trouble
Ticket.  Once published, she realized that when you selected Action the
list contained New New Trouble Ticket.  Since that looked funny, she
deleted the New Trouble Ticket form from the public folder and re-published
it as just Trouble Ticket.  Now when you go to Action it just says New
Trouble Ticket and it works fine.

The problem is this.  When you go to the Forms, Choose form menu, you see
two forms listed in the dialog box.  One is New Trouble Ticket and one is
Trouble Ticket.  If you select New Trouble Ticket, you get a Form Load
Failed error.  Additionally when you highlight that form, there is no
description icon like when you select the form that works.

When you go to the Manage forms menu, the New Trouble Ticket title doesn't
appear, so there's no way to delete it.  Can anyone help us remove this
ghost form?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Brenda L. Rogers
Integra Telecom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Large IS DB

2002-05-24 Thread Mark Arnold ()

I only mention it because you haven't, but..
XADM: Database Does Not Shrink after Several Mailbox Deletions [Q192189] talks of 
waiting a while before kicking off the eseutil. I don't think it applies since you've 
done several offline defrags over time. Can't hurt though.
Also have a look at XADM: Determining Database Free Space with Exchange 5.5 SP1 
[Q195914] which would give a truer picture of free space.

-Original Message-
From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 24 May 2002 19:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB

We have done a number of IS compresses to try to resolve it and only
gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of the reported
whitespace in the event logs).

-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Yeah, the place where you see the sizes of the mailboxes doesn't have
the option to view hidden, it shows all things. It's only a guide but
isn't usually that far out. I know you've said you're reporting 2GB of
white space but have you tried an offline defrag, in my experience
you'll gain more than it reports as spare.

-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 24 May 2002 19:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB

The report is the dump of the total size of all mailboxes (as seen from
Exchange Admin).  There are some large mailboxes on the server, but the
total space taken up by both hidden and visible mailboxes does not total
more then 8 GBthus my delima.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Do you have any hidden mailboxes that are not showing up in your
reports? Ever clean out he Admin box? Or the AV box? 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Large IS DB


Fellow exchange admins\engineers\gurus,

Does anyone have any suggestions for this situation?

Config:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
WinNT 4.0 SP6
Priv.edb = 45GB
Deleted Item Cache = 11.5 GB
Deleted Item retention was 7 days, but in an effort to fix this I set it
to 3 days to see if it would make a difference.  The DIC (ok..I can see
the jokes coming, but hey.it's Friday) was 15 GB and after the change it
shrunk to 11.5 GB after a couple days. Whitespace = Event ID's 1221
state that on average there is 2GB of whitespace

When I look at the mailbox sizes through Exchange Admin and do a dump to
CSV it totals out to be about 7 GB, yet the Priv is 45 GB.  Backups are
taking extremely long and I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestions as
to what, if any, the problem could be here.  We have done a number of IS
compresses and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of
the reported whitespace).  But with what Exchange Admin is reporting I
am concerned.

Thanks for any suggestions and for those in the states..have a good
relaxing holiday.


Best regards,
Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List 

RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Erik Sojka

Remember: The early bird gets the free conference DVD.

 -Original Message-
 From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:49 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 The strategy here is to register *way* in advance to avoid 
 the end of year we can't spend any money so you can't go panic.
 
 Darcy
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get
 sick of me and shell out the funds.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
  Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
  Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
  Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
  
  
  http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002 
  
  Martin Blackstone
  Director, Information Technologies
  Superior Access Insurance Services
  949.470.2111 x279
  
  -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he 
  sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Large IS DB

2002-05-24 Thread paragon400

That second article should be some help.  Thanks Mark!

-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


I only mention it because you haven't, but..
XADM: Database Does Not Shrink after Several Mailbox Deletions [Q192189]
talks of waiting a while before kicking off the eseutil. I don't think
it applies since you've done several offline defrags over time. Can't
hurt though. Also have a look at XADM: Determining Database Free Space
with Exchange 5.5 SP1 [Q195914] which would give a truer picture of free
space.

-Original Message-
From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 24 May 2002 19:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB

We have done a number of IS compresses to try to resolve it and only
gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of the reported
whitespace in the event logs).

-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Yeah, the place where you see the sizes of the mailboxes doesn't have
the option to view hidden, it shows all things. It's only a guide but
isn't usually that far out. I know you've said you're reporting 2GB of
white space but have you tried an offline defrag, in my experience
you'll gain more than it reports as spare.

-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 24 May 2002 19:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB

The report is the dump of the total size of all mailboxes (as seen from
Exchange Admin).  There are some large mailboxes on the server, but the
total space taken up by both hidden and visible mailboxes does not total
more then 8 GBthus my delima.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Do you have any hidden mailboxes that are not showing up in your
reports? Ever clean out he Admin box? Or the AV box? 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Large IS DB


Fellow exchange admins\engineers\gurus,

Does anyone have any suggestions for this situation?

Config:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
WinNT 4.0 SP6
Priv.edb = 45GB
Deleted Item Cache = 11.5 GB
Deleted Item retention was 7 days, but in an effort to fix this I set it
to 3 days to see if it would make a difference.  The DIC (ok..I can see
the jokes coming, but hey.it's Friday) was 15 GB and after the change it
shrunk to 11.5 GB after a couple days. Whitespace = Event ID's 1221
state that on average there is 2GB of whitespace

When I look at the mailbox sizes through Exchange Admin and do a dump to
CSV it totals out to be about 7 GB, yet the Priv is 45 GB.  Backups are
taking extremely long and I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestions as
to what, if any, the problem could be here.  We have done a number of IS
compresses and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of
the reported whitespace).  But with what Exchange Admin is reporting I
am concerned.

Thanks for any suggestions and for those in the states..have a good
relaxing holiday.


Best regards,
Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Martin Blackstone

My boss came in with a broken laptop and cell phone yesterday. I fixed them
both, then asked! I got the OK.

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


The strategy here is to register *way* in advance to avoid the end of year
we can't spend any money so you can't go panic.

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get sick
of me and shell out the funds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
 Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
 
 Martin Blackstone
 Director, Information Technologies
 Superior Access Insurance Services
 949.470.2111 x279
 
 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he
 sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Martin Blackstone

Yep!

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Remember: The early bird gets the free conference DVD.

 -Original Message-
 From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:49 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 The strategy here is to register *way* in advance to avoid
 the end of year we can't spend any money so you can't go panic.
 
 Darcy
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get 
 sick of me and shell out the funds.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
  Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
  Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
  Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
  
  
  http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002
  
  Martin Blackstone
  Director, Information Technologies
  Superior Access Insurance Services
  949.470.2111 x279
  
  -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he
  sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cannot delete form

2002-05-24 Thread Stevens, Dave

Maybe this will help?

To delete a published form, you can use the Forms Manager in
Outlook..Choose Tools | Options | Other | Advanced Options | Custom
Forms | Manage Forms.There it is!

Dave



-Original Message-
From: Exchange Forum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot delete form


Hello all:

We are running Exchange 5.5, SP 4 on W2K, SP2.  A member of my team
published a form to a public folder.  The form was called New Trouble
Ticket.  Once published, she realized that when you selected Action the
list contained New New Trouble Ticket.  Since that looked funny, she
deleted the New Trouble Ticket form from the public folder and re-published
it as just Trouble Ticket.  Now when you go to Action it just says New
Trouble Ticket and it works fine.

The problem is this.  When you go to the Forms, Choose form menu, you see
two forms listed in the dialog box.  One is New Trouble Ticket and one is
Trouble Ticket.  If you select New Trouble Ticket, you get a Form Load
Failed error.  Additionally when you highlight that form, there is no
description icon like when you select the form that works.

When you go to the Manage forms menu, the New Trouble Ticket title doesn't
appear, so there's no way to delete it.  Can anyone help us remove this
ghost form?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Brenda L. Rogers
Integra Telecom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Darcy Adams

That's how I got there last year!  By already having the tickets and registration in 
hand when the budget crunch came.  That, and a very kind soul offered to share her 
room with me.

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Ding! I'm sorry, you've already spent that money and my airline tickets are
non-refundable. Don't forget that one.

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


The strategy here is to register *way* in advance to avoid the end of year
we can't spend any money so you can't go panic.

Darcy

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get
sick of me and shell out the funds.

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
 Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002 
 
 Martin Blackstone
 Director, Information Technologies
 Superior Access Insurance Services
 949.470.2111 x279
 
 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he 
 sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MEC Registration now OPEN

2002-05-24 Thread Darcy Adams

chuckle  I used that as a selling point.

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN


Remember: The early bird gets the free conference DVD.

 -Original Message-
 From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:49 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 The strategy here is to register *way* in advance to avoid 
 the end of year we can't spend any money so you can't go panic.
 
 Darcy
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MEC Registration now OPEN
 
 
 I have begun begging in the hope that before October, my boss will get
 sick of me and shell out the funds.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 04:18 PM
  Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
  Conversation: MEC Registration now OPEN
  Subject: MEC Registration now OPEN
  
  
  http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2002 
  
  Martin Blackstone
  Director, Information Technologies
  Superior Access Insurance Services
  949.470.2111 x279
  
  -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he 
  sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up.
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



LDAP in Exchange 2000

2002-05-24 Thread Gagrani, Kishore

Any idea,  how do I install LDAP under Exchange 2000. Right now when I use
Exchange System Manager under Server -- Protocols I don't see this as a
protocol  and hence when I try to do LDAP quarry from a client machine it
comes back with an error about Operational Failure . 

Please, any help in this regard will be greatly appreciated. I searched
Knowledge Bases of Microsoft without much success.


Thank you,
Kishore 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000

2002-05-24 Thread Chris Scharff

E2K has no directory of its own, thus nothing to connect to via LDAP. You'll
need to point the client machines to the same directory that Exchange uses.

 -Original Message-
 From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:38 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: LDAP in Exchange 2000
 
 
 Any idea,  how do I install LDAP under Exchange 2000. Right 
 now when I use Exchange System Manager under Server -- 
 Protocols I don't see this as a protocol  and hence when I 
 try to do LDAP quarry from a client machine it comes back 
 with an error about Operational Failure . 
 
 Please, any help in this regard will be greatly appreciated. 
 I searched Knowledge Bases of Microsoft without much success.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Large IS DB

2002-05-24 Thread John Matteson

Have you run an ISINTEG on both the Priv and pub edb files? If you have a
lot of errors, it may keep the pages from being marked free.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal.
Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


We have done a number of IS compresses to try to resolve it and only
gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of the reported
whitespace in the event logs).

-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Yeah, the place where you see the sizes of the mailboxes doesn't have
the option to view hidden, it shows all things. It's only a guide but
isn't usually that far out. I know you've said you're reporting 2GB of
white space but have you tried an offline defrag, in my experience
you'll gain more than it reports as spare.

-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 24 May 2002 19:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB

The report is the dump of the total size of all mailboxes (as seen from
Exchange Admin).  There are some large mailboxes on the server, but the
total space taken up by both hidden and visible mailboxes does not total
more then 8 GBthus my delima.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Do you have any hidden mailboxes that are not showing up in your
reports? Ever clean out he Admin box? Or the AV box? 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Large IS DB


Fellow exchange admins\engineers\gurus,

Does anyone have any suggestions for this situation?

Config:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
WinNT 4.0 SP6
Priv.edb = 45GB
Deleted Item Cache = 11.5 GB
Deleted Item retention was 7 days, but in an effort to fix this I set it
to 3 days to see if it would make a difference.  The DIC (ok..I can see
the jokes coming, but hey.it's Friday) was 15 GB and after the change it
shrunk to 11.5 GB after a couple days. Whitespace = Event ID's 1221
state that on average there is 2GB of whitespace

When I look at the mailbox sizes through Exchange Admin and do a dump to
CSV it totals out to be about 7 GB, yet the Priv is 45 GB.  Backups are
taking extremely long and I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestions as
to what, if any, the problem could be here.  We have done a number of IS
compresses and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of
the reported whitespace).  But with what Exchange Admin is reporting I
am concerned.

Thanks for any suggestions and for those in the states..have a good
relaxing holiday.


Best regards,
Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   

Distribution Lists in Ex.5.5 converts to Distribution Lists Sec urity Groups

2002-05-24 Thread Pennell, Ronald B.

Can someone give me an explanation as to why the dist lists in ex.5.5 became
security groups in Ex.2000?

Do they need to be security groups?   They are used for email distributions
as groups...

Ron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000

2002-05-24 Thread Gagrani, Kishore

Thanks Chris for opening me up on this. So, now if I need to configure
someone's Outlook using Internet E-mail profile using POP3/SMTP , I wonder
how would the Outlook Client will now get the organization's e-mail
addresses ?


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000

E2K has no directory of its own, thus nothing to connect to via LDAP. You'll
need to point the client machines to the same directory that Exchange uses.

 -Original Message-
 From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:38 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: LDAP in Exchange 2000


 Any idea,  how do I install LDAP under Exchange 2000. Right
 now when I use Exchange System Manager under Server --
 Protocols I don't see this as a protocol  and hence when I
 try to do LDAP quarry from a client machine it comes back
 with an error about Operational Failure .

 Please, any help in this regard will be greatly appreciated.
 I searched Knowledge Bases of Microsoft without much success.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cannot delete form

2002-05-24 Thread Exchange Forum

That's the problem.  You don't see the form when you go into Forms manager.
You only see it when you do a Choose form from that public folder.  

Thanks anyway though.  Any other ideas?  Is there a way to get to the raw
data through the Exchange administrator?

Brenda



-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot delete form


Maybe this will help?

To delete a published form, you can use the Forms Manager in
Outlook..Choose Tools | Options | Other | Advanced Options | Custom
Forms | Manage Forms.There it is!

Dave



-Original Message-
From: Exchange Forum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot delete form


Hello all:

We are running Exchange 5.5, SP 4 on W2K, SP2.  A member of my team
published a form to a public folder.  The form was called New Trouble
Ticket.  Once published, she realized that when you selected Action the
list contained New New Trouble Ticket.  Since that looked funny, she
deleted the New Trouble Ticket form from the public folder and re-published
it as just Trouble Ticket.  Now when you go to Action it just says New
Trouble Ticket and it works fine.

The problem is this.  When you go to the Forms, Choose form menu, you see
two forms listed in the dialog box.  One is New Trouble Ticket and one is
Trouble Ticket.  If you select New Trouble Ticket, you get a Form Load
Failed error.  Additionally when you highlight that form, there is no
description icon like when you select the form that works.

When you go to the Manage forms menu, the New Trouble Ticket title doesn't
appear, so there's no way to delete it.  Can anyone help us remove this
ghost form?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Brenda L. Rogers
Integra Telecom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cannot delete form

2002-05-24 Thread Setmajer, Jerzy

I don't know how to fix your problem, but you can work around it by
deleting and recreating that Public Folder (move the contents elsewhere,
delete the folder and recreated it.)

-Original Message-
From: Exchange Forum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot delete form


That's the problem.  You don't see the form when you go into Forms manager.
You only see it when you do a Choose form from that public folder.  

Thanks anyway though.  Any other ideas?  Is there a way to get to the raw
data through the Exchange administrator?

Brenda



-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot delete form


Maybe this will help?

To delete a published form, you can use the Forms Manager in
Outlook..Choose Tools | Options | Other | Advanced Options | Custom
Forms | Manage Forms.There it is!

Dave



-Original Message-
From: Exchange Forum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot delete form


Hello all:

We are running Exchange 5.5, SP 4 on W2K, SP2.  A member of my team
published a form to a public folder.  The form was called New Trouble
Ticket.  Once published, she realized that when you selected Action the
list contained New New Trouble Ticket.  Since that looked funny, she
deleted the New Trouble Ticket form from the public folder and re-published
it as just Trouble Ticket.  Now when you go to Action it just says New
Trouble Ticket and it works fine.

The problem is this.  When you go to the Forms, Choose form menu, you see
two forms listed in the dialog box.  One is New Trouble Ticket and one is
Trouble Ticket.  If you select New Trouble Ticket, you get a Form Load
Failed error.  Additionally when you highlight that form, there is no
description icon like when you select the form that works.

When you go to the Manage forms menu, the New Trouble Ticket title doesn't
appear, so there's no way to delete it.  Can anyone help us remove this
ghost form?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Brenda L. Rogers
Integra Telecom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Unwanted Connector, I think.

2002-05-24 Thread tech forum

My Exchange 2000 server has recently been experiencing external slow mail delivery. 
 
I went to the SMTP queue and found wrongdomain.domain.com with 54 queues of outgoing 
mail.
 
I found the culprit in the routing group with an SMTP connrctor for 
wrongdomain.domain.com.  it appears this connector is routing all external mail which 
the SMTP virtual server should be doing.
 
I'm assuming that this is the reason for my slow mail, but is it ok to delete the 
connector and if so will I loose all of the outgoing mail?
 
Help would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Nathan
â²Úh²Ø§€P†Ûiÿü0Â̝Ç(›úÞ²‹«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m˜
܆+Þ²m§ÿðÃ0Êy¢oìŠ×¬yªÜ‡ûj·!jÊS¢éì¹»®Þ™¨¥¶‰^j÷žÅÈZž¥²Ì2žG(˜L\…©àx¸¬µ§fŠyb²Öš)ìÃ)är‰


RE: Bad Mail and slow mail. Could it be a connector?

2002-05-24 Thread tech forum

There is a SMTP connector on this Exchange server named
wrongdomin.domain.com.  This accounts for the 54 queues that are in the
SMTP queue.  I think it was setup when the server was not the primary
server.  Now we just have a relay pointing all mail to this internal
Exchange server.

Therefore can I delete the connector and do you think that will speed up
the external delivery times?

Help is appreciated.

Thanks

Nathan

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bad Mail


I'm not a Guru of the list, but the BadMail folder is a last resort
folder for messages that can't be delivered AND the NDR fails.  The
amount of messages in that folder would make sense given what you've
said.  

To the issue of the address still being there:  What addresses are in
your default Recipient Policy, or did you have a separate policy for the
temporary address?

-Original Message-
From: tech forum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Bad Mail


Gurus of the list.

Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 Server SP2.

I have an Exchange 2000 network and a few users have recently complained
of slow external mail delivery, three hour delivery being common.  I
looked through the queues and I was confused by what I saw.  

I read the articles in Tony Redmonds book and searched the normal FAQs
and MS support, although helpful information it doesn't help me
understand what I am seeing.

Looking at the the queue I see the normal stuff that I would expect:

Domain.com local delivery
Messages with 
And a few others 

Then I see 54 entries of wrongname.domain.com to a load of different
domains, with anywhere between 0 and 250 messages.  When we first set up
the Exchange 2000 server we set wrongname.domain.com as an alternative
address for every users account then took it off the recipient policy
but those aliases still exist.

I also went to the Bad Mail folder and found 100,814 entires in there.

Any ideas what is wrong here.  Also does Exchange have a way to delete
the Bad Mail after a certain point?

Thanks

Nathan Boyd

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Large IS DB

2002-05-24 Thread paragon400

I will look into doing this as well.  Thanks for the suggestion John.

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Have you run an ISINTEG on both the Priv and pub edb files? If you have
a lot of errors, it may keep the pages from being marked free.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary,
and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my
goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is
a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


We have done a number of IS compresses to try to resolve it and only
gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of the reported
whitespace in the event logs).

-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Yeah, the place where you see the sizes of the mailboxes doesn't have
the option to view hidden, it shows all things. It's only a guide but
isn't usually that far out. I know you've said you're reporting 2GB of
white space but have you tried an offline defrag, in my experience
you'll gain more than it reports as spare.

-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 24 May 2002 19:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB

The report is the dump of the total size of all mailboxes (as seen from
Exchange Admin).  There are some large mailboxes on the server, but the
total space taken up by both hidden and visible mailboxes does not total
more then 8 GBthus my delima.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Large IS DB


Do you have any hidden mailboxes that are not showing up in your
reports? Ever clean out he Admin box? Or the AV box? 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Large IS DB


Fellow exchange admins\engineers\gurus,

Does anyone have any suggestions for this situation?

Config:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
WinNT 4.0 SP6
Priv.edb = 45GB
Deleted Item Cache = 11.5 GB
Deleted Item retention was 7 days, but in an effort to fix this I set it
to 3 days to see if it would make a difference.  The DIC (ok..I can see
the jokes coming, but hey.it's Friday) was 15 GB and after the change it
shrunk to 11.5 GB after a couple days. Whitespace = Event ID's 1221
state that on average there is 2GB of whitespace

When I look at the mailbox sizes through Exchange Admin and do a dump to
CSV it totals out to be about 7 GB, yet the Priv is 45 GB.  Backups are
taking extremely long and I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestions as
to what, if any, the problem could be here.  We have done a number of IS
compresses and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of
the reported whitespace).  But with what Exchange Admin is reporting I
am concerned.

Thanks for any suggestions and for those in the states..have a good
relaxing holiday.


Best regards,
Steve


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:  

RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000

2002-05-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim

Depends on the version of Outlook. Back level clients will query the E2K
server which uses DSproxy services to do the lookup for the client. Outlook
2000 and XP are given a nearby GC server to do it's own lookups.

-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000


Thanks Chris for opening me up on this. So, now if I need to configure
someone's Outlook using Internet E-mail profile using POP3/SMTP , I wonder
how would the Outlook Client will now get the organization's e-mail
addresses ?


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000

E2K has no directory of its own, thus nothing to connect to via LDAP. You'll
need to point the client machines to the same directory that Exchange uses.

 -Original Message-
 From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:38 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: LDAP in Exchange 2000


 Any idea,  how do I install LDAP under Exchange 2000. Right
 now when I use Exchange System Manager under Server --
 Protocols I don't see this as a protocol  and hence when I
 try to do LDAP quarry from a client machine it comes back
 with an error about Operational Failure .

 Please, any help in this regard will be greatly appreciated.
 I searched Knowledge Bases of Microsoft without much success.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000

2002-05-24 Thread Siegfried Weber

Note that this procedure only applies if you use a MAPI client like
Outlook 97/98/2000/2002 (98  2000 in CW mode only).

Siegfried /

 -Original Message-
 From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:37 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000
 
 Depends on the version of Outlook. Back level clients will query the
E2K
 server which uses DSproxy services to do the lookup for the client.
 Outlook
 2000 and XP are given a nearby GC server to do it's own lookups.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 4:09 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000
 
 
 Thanks Chris for opening me up on this. So, now if I need to configure
 someone's Outlook using Internet E-mail profile using POP3/SMTP , I
wonder
 how would the Outlook Client will now get the organization's e-mail
 addresses ?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:44 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: LDAP in Exchange 2000
 
 E2K has no directory of its own, thus nothing to connect to via LDAP.
 You'll
 need to point the client machines to the same directory that Exchange
 uses.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:38 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: LDAP in Exchange 2000
 
 
  Any idea,  how do I install LDAP under Exchange 2000. Right
  now when I use Exchange System Manager under Server --
  Protocols I don't see this as a protocol  and hence when I
  try to do LDAP quarry from a client machine it comes back
  with an error about Operational Failure .
 
  Please, any help in this regard will be greatly appreciated.
  I searched Knowledge Bases of Microsoft without much success.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   >