RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
Mostly that you're an idiot, a troll, or both. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 June 2002 02:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server All right what does argle mean? --Felicity Argle. - Original Message - From: MS Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:28 PM Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Maybe it's time to go with D or I! -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they were not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now it's not a competitor anymore since they became the same company. But I still like servers that start with C better than those that start with H. But I think Ed is also from the C side, right? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server I apologise for the OT question... Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array? (hardware RAID) I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the array it is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error right? When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually corrupts) the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents backups from completing. hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't handle the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in the process of rebuilding itself... The hardware vendor has recommended re-creating the RAID array from scratch and restoring from backup Any thoughts? sorry again for the OT question - but I'll even throw in a Friday afternoon Haiku for good measure: Friday afternoon gotta get going home server is cactus Thanks, MP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
I am trying to allow my programmers to develop an application that will mail outside of our local domain. We are running the script on an IIS server. The problem is that while we can deliver to our local domain ,mail going to outside domains fails. Our firewall only allows SMTP connections from our Exchange 2000 servers and it appears that the IIS server is trying to send mail directly to the remote domains. So I think my question is how do I force my IIS server to forward all messages to my Exchange 2000 servers. Obviously I am missing something simple but, danged if I can figure it out. Brian Brian Narkinsky System Manager Department of Environmental Protection MS 6520 2600 Blairstone RD Tallahassee, FL 32399 phone (850)488-1205 fax (850)412-0400 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
You broke a nail, too? How? - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 9:07 PM Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server I had a similar experience with Compaq. Made my company a Compaq-free zone at the time. It's amazing how future purchases are based on experiences like that. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Who is the I company? I despise that company whose name begins with D and rhymes with Hell. I was adminstering this Dell server and we started getting error messages in the event log which looked strange and were coming from the disk drive. So I called the D company and every support engineer told me it was something different. Eventually after I complained enough they started sending me replacement drives through a vendor. I plugged these in same message, they said oops, we sent you another bad drive, so their vendor sent me another. Oops, it was the same one I originally sent out. So the D company eventually sent me a drive from their real warehouse, and - we still got the error. Then they started saying that our application had caused the hard drive error message, and we were to rebuild the drive array from a backup. I asked them how is it that an application is causing hard drive error's. They didn't have an answer. We eventually migrated to a different server and we were able to sweet talk them into getting a replacement. I hated working on the innards of these servers as well. I mean have you seen how they are laid out. The memory array card's have to be the most bizzare thing I have ever seen. I broke a nail taking one of these out. Give me the C word any day. --Felicity Maybe it's time to go with D or I! -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they = were not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now it's not a competitor anymore since they became the same company. But I still like servers that start with C better than those that start with H. But I = think Ed is also from the C side, right? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue. =20 Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server I apologise for the OT question... Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array? (hardware RAID) I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the = array it is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error = right? When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually = corrupts) the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents = backups from completing. hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't = handle the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in = the process of rebuilding itself... The hardware vendor has recommended re-creating the RAID array from = scratch and restoring from backup Any thoughts? sorry again for the OT question - but I'll even throw in a Friday = afternoon Haiku for good measure: Friday afternoon gotta get going home=20 server is cactus Thanks, MP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cannot access some mail after repair
After performing a repair of an Exchange Database I have problem opening some mails. When trying to open it I receive this message: Cannot open this item. When I try to delete it I will receive this message: This item could not be deleted, it was either moved or already deleted or access was denied. The weired thing is that I have this problem only with email from an external domain. Anybody has an idea how to solve this? Thanks, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restore Single Mailbox
Thanks for the replies. (I hadn't come across this Q in my searching - many thanks.) Trouble is that I had restarted the IS before I read this Q article! [= consistent IS up to last backup, but not the post-backup transactions]. Restore - even with the Restore in Progress key LOOKS through the post-backup Logs but doesn't play them. My boss thinks there's something which says they have been played already so don't bother playing them again. [?] I have created a new IS from the tape so I don't think they have been played at all against this IS. The data is not in the IS. I was thinking that since the post-backup logs were copied manually there is nothing to tell Exchange 'old' and 'new' database paths like the reg key does, so the logs want to play into a dbase on G: (original drive) while the actual IS I'm restoring to is on an F: drive. Could this be possible? The users concerned were less than over the moon to have lost half a day's email but they've left us now! I've got time to try this again (with a smaller database this time). It seems the most imporatant thing is NOT to start the IS until, well, one knows exactly what one is doing! Thanks again. Eugene -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore Single Mailbox Based on what you have said this should do the trick. That is if you do full backups every day. We have done that for several of our customers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: McCarthy, Eugene (AFIT) Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 04:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Restore Single Mailbox Hi All, I'd be interested to know if anyone has successfully restored a deleted mailbox to its state half-way through the day (between backups). What happened: Administrator accidentally deleted mailbox - not his fault really. What I'd like: 1. Full restore of IS to re-create mailbox as it was at time of Tuesday evening backup (straight forward !) 2. Replay Transaction Logs up to the last one before deletion (3pm Wednesday). In theory, I may be able to frig the Restore in Progress reg key, empty the .PAT file, and rename the last Log I want to use as edb.log. But will it work? Has anyone tried? Thanks for any feedback. Eugene _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cable Modems
With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with users receiving attachments
Since installing my first ex2000 server in my 5.5 site, some of my users are getting problems reading email attachments. Taking long periods of time receiving them and only getting partial doc's. Most of these users are usnig mac's and/or getting email via netscape. Ubderstand that there is a problem with users sending attachments with Rich Text verses Plain Test or HTML. Some of these attachments are coming up as ms-tnef verses word.Are there any known issues with this happening once the GAL was changed under Ex2000? Or anything else Thanks Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook for Mac
Andrey, I do know that Macs do not use WINS (at least through Mac OS 9.2). They can use DNS, however, I must admit to not having triedmy Outlook 2001 against and Exchange 2000 server. You say that they can ping the server so that means their TCPIP is setup correctly. When you setup the Outlook profile did their name get underlined when you did the Test Settings? How is the hosts file setup? Do you have the listings for the DNS server(s) in the file? Do you have the correct FQDN for the Exchange server? That's all I have for now. If I think of anything else I will let you know. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Tony Hlabse Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2002 10:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook for Mac Did you check WINS? -- Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:30 PM Subject: Outlook for Mac Hi all. I have a couple of customers who cannot connect to our Exchange 2000 servers with Outlook for Mac (versions 8.2 and 2001) They have set up their HOSTS file correctly. They can ping the Exchange server. When they launch Outlook, it seems to find the server as it prompts them to enter their username, windows domain name, and password. After they supply their credentials, Outlook comes back with an error message saying that their name could not be resolved against a global address list. When they try to log onto the same mailbox from a PC, everything works. Each customer has their own GAL with correct permissions and filter. Does anyone here have experience with Outlook for Mac and Exchange 2000? I have already checked all the articles on MS KB and searched through the newsgroups. Found some tips but they did not help. Thanks in advance! Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST http://www.innerhost.com P.S. I can't believe I actually used to love Macs 10 years ago. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restore distribution lists
Thank you all for the replies. I ended up Calling tech support since I DID restore, and my IS wouldn't start (before I got these emails from y'all). I used my online Veritas backup. Stopped all services, Renamed dir.edb, ran the restore of the Exchange directory using Veritas, tried to start IS...no good. Renamed the restored dir.edb, renamed the original back to dir.edb..still no IS. Called Tech support, and for some reason the service account didn't have rights. I gave it proper rights again, and it worked. Folks were complaining after this of mail sitting in the out box...rebooted the server, and it fixed that. MS Gave me Q155414 as the procedure for restoring DL's. I should have been renaming the DSADATA folder and not the dir.edb as stated below by Raj. Thanks again, Ron -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore distribution lists Ron: If you have an offline backup: stop all services, rename DSADATA dir to DSADATA.old,restore the DSADATA directory from backup ,start system attendant and directory service export the DLs to a .csv file . Bring back the old DSADATA dir and import the DLs. This should work. Let me know if you need step by step. I did this not too long ago. Raj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Restore distribution lists All of my distribution lists were deleted by a sister company who THOUGHT they could delete them without effecting me. The THOUGHT the ADC was not functioning and that they had removed any connections to my 5.5 server. *sigh* So, I need to re-create all of my DL's, or restore them from back up, but I have never done this. It is a simple Directory restore, or does the IS need to get involved? If this could cause corruption, I might as well get busy re-creating them..since I don't even want to go down the corruption road. Thanks for the insight, Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Masks in Routing Restrictions
Hi Exch 5.5 I was wondering if the last section in the IMS routing restrictions, the area for 'hosts that can NEVER route mail', if it can take entire subnets in one statement. For example if I wanted to add the subnet for a group of hotmail servers could I enter '65.54.254.0 255.255.255.0', or do I have to enter every individual server? I asked this question before with respect to the message filter where it didn't seem to work. Much thanks e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ?
DO you have any ideas how long it take to move all mailbox (move Mailbox method) from an ex 5.5 server to an ex 2000 server on a Switcher network ? Any approximative number ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP log analysis
Okay I need an opinion on exactly what is going on in this log file. Just a fresh
opinion to see if I'm just being a bonehead. Thanks in advance...
2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 EHLO - aus-exch-01.ztechinc.com 0 0 4 0 125 SMTP - - - -
2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250-wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com 0 0 31 0 266 SMTP - - - -
2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 MAIL - FROM:+SIZE=3169 0 0 4 0 266 SMTP - - - -
2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Sender++and+extensions+(SIZE=3169)+Ok 0 0 43 0 407 SMTP - -
- -
2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 RCPT - TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0 4 0 407 SMTP - - - -
2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Recipient++Ok[EMAIL PROTECTED]+Ok
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0 39 0 547 SMTP - - - -
2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 DATA - - 0 0 4 0 547 SMTP - - - -
2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 354+Ok+Send+data+ending+with+CRLF.CRLF 0 0 42 0 672 SMTP - -
- -
2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - -
250+Message+received:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0 0 98 0 2000 SMTP - - - -
2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 QUIT - - 0 0 4 0 2000 SMTP - - - -
2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1
AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 221+wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com+ESMTP+server+closing+connection 0
0 63 0 2125 SMTP - - - -
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
Beauty and brains. My favorite combination. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 7:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Establish a telnet connection from the 5.5 server to the e2k server and have an smtp conversation. I believe that is what he meant. Use Q153119 if you need help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain if you mean by typing the smtp address in the Address field, the answer is NO! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you send an SMTP message to the E2K server manually is it delivered? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it does in Exchange 5.5. And if I type the address in Outlook connected to E2k it resolves properly and even sends it out to the internet, but it can not recieve in the E2K connected box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you type in that address and do an alt-k does it resolve properly and deliver? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it is. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:14 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes the SMTP address is configured as inbound in Exchange2 IMS. And yes it is the non-ability to receive internet email on the E2K box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? And is that SMTP domain defined on the IMS as inbound? Yes the E2K can send/receive to each other and to Ex 5.5. They can also send messages out to the world. In the first post you said they couldn't send or receive... But it's actually just an ability to receive internet e-mail which routes through the existing Exchange 5.5 IMS correct? No error is logged in the Event Viewer for ADC . A sample copy of the NDR is below: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/31/2002 11:35 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=us;a= ;p=domain;l=EXCHANGE20205311834LQXMZZ2G MSEXCH:IMS:domain:NZDOM:EXCHANGE2 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The mail boxes which were moved to E2K can be see within the recepient container of Exchange 5.5 (original container in which they were created) The recipient container for the site? That would be expected since they are sill in the site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:57 AM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain I moved a few boxes from 5.5 to E2K, however even though all the boxes within
Exchange 2000 config does not appear in E5.5
We installed the ADC then joined our exchange 5.5 site with a new exchange 2000 server from our new domain. The config_ca works from exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000, we can see all the exchange 5.5 sites and connectors in ESM. But we can not see any Exchange 2000 configuration in Exchange 5.5 admin (no admingroups/sites or connectors). Any ideas? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 config does not appear in E5.5
We installed the ADC then joined our exchange 5.5 site with a new exchange 2000 server from our new domain. The config_ca works from exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000, we can see all the exchange 5.5 sites and connectors in ESM. But we can not see any Exchange 2000 configuration in Exchange 5.5 admin (no admingroups/sites or connectors). When we force replication the E2k admin groups start to appear as E55. sites but they vanish shortly afterwards!!??? We have increased the logging of the ADC to minimum for all types and checked the errors we are getting and nothing seems to be obvious. Any ideas? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
Ok, I get Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED]. So where should I now be looking at? - Original Message - From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:12 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Establish a telnet connection from the 5.5 server to the e2k server and have an smtp conversation. I believe that is what he meant. Use Q153119 if you need help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain if you mean by typing the smtp address in the Address field, the answer is NO! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you send an SMTP message to the E2K server manually is it delivered? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it does in Exchange 5.5. And if I type the address in Outlook connected to E2k it resolves properly and even sends it out to the internet, but it can not recieve in the E2K connected box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you type in that address and do an alt-k does it resolve properly and deliver? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it is. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:14 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes the SMTP address is configured as inbound in Exchange2 IMS. And yes it is the non-ability to receive internet email on the E2K box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? And is that SMTP domain defined on the IMS as inbound? Yes the E2K can send/receive to each other and to Ex 5.5. They can also send messages out to the world. In the first post you said they couldn't send or receive... But it's actually just an ability to receive internet e-mail which routes through the existing Exchange 5.5 IMS correct? No error is logged in the Event Viewer for ADC . A sample copy of the NDR is below: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/31/2002 11:35 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=us;a= ;p=domain;l=EXCHANGE20205311834LQXMZZ2G MSEXCH:IMS:domain:NZDOM:EXCHANGE2 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The mail boxes which were moved to E2K can be see within the recepient container of Exchange 5.5 (original container in which they were created) The recipient container for the site? That would be expected since they are sill in the site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:57 AM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain I moved a few boxes from 5.5 to E2K, however even though all the boxes within 5.5 can
Creating multiple mailboxes
Can anyone tell me what the possibilities are to create multiple mailboxes at once (for example import functions)? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calendar Default Permission
Hi all, Is there a way I can change all the mailboxe's calendar's default permission ? (I mean without logging into everyone's mailboxes's individually ). Thank you for your answers in advance , Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
I take it you are running WebDav. If so some of the legacy proxy server trap for non standard verbs in the IIS protocol. So when they see some of the WebDav verbs coming through they drop the packets. Have a look at your proxy logs to see what happens when it sees WebDav coming through. --Felicity I am trying to allow my programmers to develop an application that = will mail outside of our local domain. =20 We are running the script on an IIS server. The problem is that while = we can deliver to our local domain ,mail going to outside domains fails. =20 Our firewall only allows SMTP connections from our Exchange 2000 = servers and it appears that the IIS server is trying to send mail directly to = the remote domains. =20 So I think my question is how do I force my IIS server to forward all messages to my Exchange 2000 servers. Obviously I am missing = something simple but, danged if I can figure it out. =20 =20 Brian Brian Narkinsky System Manager Department of Environmental Protection MS 6520 2600 Blairstone RD Tallahassee, FL 32399 phone (850)488-1205 fax (850)412-0400 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
VPN or a secured OWA (via secure-id, SSL, etc) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
Dear Dot, Virtual Private Network. I have Verizon DSL at home. Wawa has a VPN. It is not as good as sitting at my desk, but it is way better than 56k RAS. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 08:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
How do you receive this email if you email server is not publicly accusable? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
I was taking one of the memory array's out (not one of the vendor reps - although I was furious with them and would have taken all of them out (as in to whack not on a date)) and my nail got caught on one of the array's. --Felicity You broke a nail, too? How? - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 9:07 PM Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server I had a similar experience with Compaq. Made my company a Compaq-free zone at the time. It's amazing how future purchases are based on experiences like that. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Who is the I company? I despise that company whose name begins with D and rhymes with Hell. I was adminstering this Dell server and we started getting error messages in the event log which looked strange and were coming from the disk drive. So I called the D company and every support engineer told me it was something different. Eventually after I complained enough they started sending me replacement drives through a vendor. I plugged these in same message, they said oops, we sent you another bad drive, so their vendor sent me another. Oops, it was the same one I originally sent out. So the D company eventually sent me a drive from their real warehouse, and - we still got the error. Then they started saying that our application had caused the hard drive error message, and we were to rebuild the drive array from a backup. I asked them how is it that an application is causing hard drive error's. They didn't have an answer. We eventually migrated to a different server and we were able to sweet talk them into getting a replacement. I hated working on the innards of these servers as well. I mean have you seen how they are laid out. The memory array card's have to be the most bizzare thing I have ever seen. I broke a nail taking one of these out. Give me the C word any day. --Felicity Maybe it's time to go with D or I! -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they = were not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now it's not a competitor anymore since they became the same company. But I still like servers that start with C better than those that start with H. But I = think Ed is also from the C side, right? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue. =20 Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server I apologise for the OT question... Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array? (hardware RAID) I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the = array it is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error = right? When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually = corrupts) the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents = backups from completing. hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't = handle the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in = the process of rebuilding itself... The hardware vendor has recommended re-creating the RAID array from = scratch and restoring from backup Any thoughts? sorry again for the OT question - but I'll even throw in a Friday = afternoon Haiku for good measure: Friday afternoon gotta get going home=20 server is cactus Thanks, MP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ?
Take a simple like 2MB excel file transfer from one server to the other. Time it. Multiply by 11, then add in some extra I like 20% you should have about the right time then bill -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? DO you have any ideas how long it take to move all mailbox (move Mailbox method) from an ex 5.5 server to an ex 2000 server on a Switcher network ? Any approximative number ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
WE are here.. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Where are you? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? WE are here.. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
blush Why Thank you! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Beauty and brains. My favorite combination. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 7:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Establish a telnet connection from the 5.5 server to the e2k server and have an smtp conversation. I believe that is what he meant. Use Q153119 if you need help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain if you mean by typing the smtp address in the Address field, the answer is NO! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you send an SMTP message to the E2K server manually is it delivered? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it does in Exchange 5.5. And if I type the address in Outlook connected to E2k it resolves properly and even sends it out to the internet, but it can not recieve in the E2K connected box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you type in that address and do an alt-k does it resolve properly and deliver? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it is. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:14 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes the SMTP address is configured as inbound in Exchange2 IMS. And yes it is the non-ability to receive internet email on the E2K box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? And is that SMTP domain defined on the IMS as inbound? Yes the E2K can send/receive to each other and to Ex 5.5. They can also send messages out to the world. In the first post you said they couldn't send or receive... But it's actually just an ability to receive internet e-mail which routes through the existing Exchange 5.5 IMS correct? No error is logged in the Event Viewer for ADC . A sample copy of the NDR is below: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/31/2002 11:35 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=us;a= ;p=domain;l=EXCHANGE20205311834LQXMZZ2G MSEXCH:IMS:domain:NZDOM:EXCHANGE2 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The mail boxes which were moved to E2K can be see within the recepient container of Exchange 5.5 (original container in which they were created) The recipient container for the site? That would be expected since they are sill in the site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
RE: Where is everyone?
I'm here? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? WE are here.. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Yes. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP log analysis
Below inline. -Original Message- From: Lindsay Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP log analysis Okay I need an opinion on exactly what is going on in this log file. Just a fresh opinion to see if I'm just being a bonehead. Thanks in advance... 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 EHLO - aus-exch-01.ztechinc.com 0 0 4 0 125 SMTP - - - - This is your server say Hi! 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250-wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com 0 0 31 0 266 SMTP - - - - This is mail-store.com saying it got your EHLO 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 MAIL - FROM:+SIZE=3169 0 0 4 0 266 SMTP - - - - From: is (note, some hosts reject this) 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Sender++and+extensions+(SIZE=3169)+Ok 0 0 43 0 407 SMTP - - - - They got the From data fine. 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 RCPT - TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0 4 0 407 SMTP - - - - Your server telling the other host to whom the mail should be delivered to. 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Recipient++Ok[EMAIL PROTECTED]+Ok mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0 39 0 547 SMTP - - - - Their server is OK with that. 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 DATA - - 0 0 4 0 547 SMTP - - - - Your server telling their server that data is on the way. 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 354+Ok+Send+data+ending+with+CRLF.CRLF 0 0 42 0 672 SMTP - - - - Their server is ready for data. 2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Message+received:+20020603091609.HFAI9038.wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com@au s-exch-01.ztechinc.com 0 0 98 0 2000 SMTP - - - - Them telling you that they've gotten the message and now have accepted responsibility to deliver it. 2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 QUIT - - 0 0 4 0 2000 SMTP - - - - You closing the connection 2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 221+wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com+ESMTP+server+closing+connection 0 0 63 0 2125 SMTP - - - - All done. What's the problem? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Phoenix, AZ. Send rain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ?
Shouldn't it be 11,000? Going from 2Meg to 22Gig. Or did you mean a 2Gig file? Bottom line though, is it depends. Machine, Network, time of day, etc all will effect the speed. As Bill suggested try a smaller file and do the math to get an estimate. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? Take a simple like 2MB excel file transfer from one server to the other. Time it. Multiply by 11, then add in some extra I like 20% you should have about the right time then bill -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? DO you have any ideas how long it take to move all mailbox (move Mailbox method) from an ex 5.5 server to an ex 2000 server on a Switcher network ? Any approximative number ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
NYC - everyone is coming on line at once, you must all be getting back from something. --Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Or do most Exchange admin's crawl out of bed at 1:40 pm? -Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
WE DO NOT CRAWL... Stagger maybe, but we do not crawl. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Or do most Exchange admin's crawl out of bed at 1:40 pm? -Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
I go to bed at 1 am. Get up at 5am. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Or do most Exchange admin's crawl out of bed at 1:40 pm? -Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
We have two smtp servers that handle our mail routing. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems How do you receive this email if you email server is not publicly accusable? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Bellevue.. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
We were all at the Tony Awards. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? NYC - everyone is coming on line at once, you must all be getting back from something. --Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migration Situation
All, I have a situation here. I'm in the process of migrating my public folders over from 5.5 to E2K. There is one thing that I'm not too sure of. On our Exchange 5.5 public folders we used distribution lists for access to certain public folders. So my questions to everyone is, how can I keep the same security on these folders when I move them over to E2K? Cause I'm aware that the DL's won't transfer over when I move the folders over. What is the best way to accomplish this? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
You're home? Are you there to stay? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
M coming online -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? NYC - everyone is coming on line at once, you must all be getting back from something. --Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
I think Italy... England messed up their chances over the weekend... Stu ExPat Brit -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
LOL atta boy!! There is always someone with their head in the gutter. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? M coming online -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? NYC - everyone is coming on line at once, you must all be getting back from something. --Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
They don't call him ass baron for nothing!! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? LOL atta boy!! There is always someone with their head in the gutter. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? M coming online -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? NYC - everyone is coming on line at once, you must all be getting back from something. --Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Only the secret cabal knows, which of course doesn't exist. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? You're home? Are you there to stay? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ?
Ok..sure make fun of my mathNext it'll be my typing then my Spelling... Wait that's ok I think Im from the era of New Math. -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? Shouldn't it be 11,000? Going from 2Meg to 22Gig. Or did you mean a 2Gig file? Bottom line though, is it depends. Machine, Network, time of day, etc all will effect the speed. As Bill suggested try a smaller file and do the math to get an estimate. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? Take a simple like 2MB excel file transfer from one server to the other. Time it. Multiply by 11, then add in some extra I like 20% you should have about the right time then bill -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? DO you have any ideas how long it take to move all mailbox (move Mailbox method) from an ex 5.5 server to an ex 2000 server on a Switcher network ? Any approximative number ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Creating multiple mailboxes
Have you searched TechNet? There's a KB article detailing directory import export - search for import export FAQ and it should be a top hit. Missy - Original Message - From: Robert Jan Duyverman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:17 AM Subject: Creating multiple mailboxes Can anyone tell me what the possibilities are to create multiple mailboxes at once (for example import functions)? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2002 attachment security
Hi Everybody, I have gotten around OL XP's annoying attachment security through the reg hack at slipstick.com. However, I still get a save to disk.. dialog box when I receive an attachment. This is a pain in the ass when we're sending around .LNK attachments, adding at extra step. Is there any way that OL XP can be fooled into opening attachments straight from the mail window, like 2000? Thanks -Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
Don't assume that. As for EASIEST - go with OWA using SSL. This way ALL your users can view email from the outside, not just the cable modem people. And you leverage existing hardware and software because you already have it all. (as opposed to adding VPN capabilities to your infrastructure) If you're looking to justify VPN, then remote mail access may be a good reason - VPN is great over broadband! Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where is everyone?
Got plenty of that here - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:43 PM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Phoenix, AZ. Send rain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
I think VPN is easy, but then I am a Network Engineer so I find things a silly as VPN easy ;o) -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
Accusable??? That's the Kevin I know! :P -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems How do you receive this email if you email server is not publicly accusable? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
It takes you that long??? Or are you including removing it from the box? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Replication Message (Ver 6.0.5762)
Now we are getting somewhere. Yes, I have is set to send me NDR's and I understand that part. One of the machines died and had to have a fresh install of Exchange 2000 (using the old databases which were OK) and that's where I get confused. Once it was re-built (side note...a guy from Microsoft's tech support helped me do itone of the most helpful people I have ever worked with), I assume it knows nothing about the old Exchange 5.5 and it is no longer an upgrade??? As such, my ADC connection agreements do not seem to be working. I tried to get them to work but it does not see the Exchange server on port 379, 389 or 390 (my wild a## guesses). Any idea what I am doing wrong? It sounds like if I can get that part figured out, it will alleviate the other?? To say the least, I am confused. Arch -Original Message- From: Saunders, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Replication Message (Ver 6.0.5762) You are correct, they do have to do with directory replication. This is a dir-rep message directed to the DSA on a server named TRUCK. Do you still have this server? Are your ADC Connection Agreements in order, especialy your ConfigCA? Apparently the active directory doesn't see the address, hence the 5.1.1 DSN. Also, most likely the reason you got this is because the SMTP virtual server is set to send a copy of NDR's to you. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Replication Message (Ver 6.0.5762) Since I swapped over to Exchange 2000 from Exchange 5.5, I keep getting these messages in my inbox. I assume they have something to do with the Exchange site/directory replication?? What do I do to stop them? The message is: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Replication Message (Ver 6.0.5762) Sent: 05/30/2002 7:57 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/30/2002 7:56 AM The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address. car.dog.com #5.1.1 Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
Putting the rack mount brackets on -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems It takes you that long??? Or are you including removing it from the box? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar Default Permission
Send out a note to the users to tell them how. Make it a policy so they have to do it. Report to management those that do not comply. -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Default Permission Hi all, Is there a way I can change all the mailboxe's calendar's default permission ? (I mean without logging into everyone's mailboxes's individually ). Thank you for your answers in advance , Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
What? No flux capacitor or power line with 1.21 gigawatts? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Putting the rack mount brackets on -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems It takes you that long??? Or are you including removing it from the box? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: SMTP log analysis
Um... That a bit of a generic question... Can we narrow it down, or can I answer with SMTP message traffic? -Original Message- From: Lindsay Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP log analysis Okay I need an opinion on exactly what is going on in this log file. Just a fresh opinion to see if I'm just being a bonehead. Thanks in advance... 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 EHLO - aus-exch-01.ztechinc.com 0 0 4 0 125 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250-wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com 0 0 31 0 266 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 MAIL - FROM:+SIZE=3169 0 0 4 0 266 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Sender++and+extensions+(SIZE=3169)+Ok 0 0 43 0 407 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 RCPT - TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0 4 0 407 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Recipient++Ok[EMAIL PROTECTED]+Ok mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0 39 0 547 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 DATA - - 0 0 4 0 547 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 354+Ok+Send+data+ending+with+CRLF.CRLF 0 0 42 0 672 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Message+received:+20020603091609.HFAI9038.wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com@au s-exch-01.ztechinc.com 0 0 98 0 2000 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 QUIT - - 0 0 4 0 2000 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 221+wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com+ESMTP+server+closing+connection 0 0 63 0 2125 SMTP - - - - .+--x m ,)¸r(ື \檆b=!6 0 觑zǚ䀱r,:.˛ m隊[hy渀\z[, )rɄZ Zvh쀧+-i٢2 G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
I'd start by looking at my recipient policies I think. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Ok, I get Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED]. So where should I now be looking at? - Original Message - From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:12 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Establish a telnet connection from the 5.5 server to the e2k server and have an smtp conversation. I believe that is what he meant. Use Q153119 if you need help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain if you mean by typing the smtp address in the Address field, the answer is NO! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you send an SMTP message to the E2K server manually is it delivered? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it does in Exchange 5.5. And if I type the address in Outlook connected to E2k it resolves properly and even sends it out to the internet, but it can not recieve in the E2K connected box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you type in that address and do an alt-k does it resolve properly and deliver? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it is. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:14 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes the SMTP address is configured as inbound in Exchange2 IMS. And yes it is the non-ability to receive internet email on the E2K box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? And is that SMTP domain defined on the IMS as inbound? Yes the E2K can send/receive to each other and to Ex 5.5. They can also send messages out to the world. In the first post you said they couldn't send or receive... But it's actually just an ability to receive internet e-mail which routes through the existing Exchange 5.5 IMS correct? No error is logged in the Event Viewer for ADC . A sample copy of the NDR is below: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/31/2002 11:35 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=us;a= ;p=domain;l=EXCHANGE20205311834LQXMZZ2G MSEXCH:IMS:domain:NZDOM:EXCHANGE2 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The mail boxes which were moved to E2K can be see within the recepient container of Exchange 5.5 (original container in which they were created) The recipient container for the site? That would be
RE: Calendar Default Permission
Absolutely. I happen to be a reseller for just such an application... How many seats will you be needing licenses for? -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Default Permission Hi all, Is there a way I can change all the mailboxe's calendar's default permission ? (I mean without logging into everyone's mailboxes's individually ). Thank you for your answers in advance , Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migration Situation
They won't? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migration Situation All, I have a situation here. I'm in the process of migrating my public folders over from 5.5 to E2K. There is one thing that I'm not too sure of. On our Exchange 5.5 public folders we used distribution lists for access to certain public folders. So my questions to everyone is, how can I keep the same security on these folders when I move them over to E2K? Cause I'm aware that the DL's won't transfer over when I move the folders over. What is the best way to accomplish this? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
It'll be Germany over Italy 1-nil on penalty shots. In the entire World Cup there will be a grand total of 22 goals. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ward, Stuart Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I think Italy... England messed up their chances over the weekend... Stu ExPat Brit -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
Right... I have my power tools for that... ;o) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Putting the rack mount brackets on -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems It takes you that long??? Or are you including removing it from the box? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Outlook 2002 attachment security
Why would anyone need to send around a .lnk file and do you understand why the Outlook object model was modified in the first place? -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 attachment security Hi Everybody, I have gotten around OL XP's annoying attachment security through the reg hack at slipstick.com. However, I still get a save to disk.. dialog box when I receive an attachment. This is a pain in the ass when we're sending around .LNK attachments, adding at extra step. Is there any way that OL XP can be fooled into opening attachments straight from the mail window, like 2000? Thanks -Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migration Situation
You need at least one domain that is native mode into which you use the ADC to create universal security groups. These groups become the security groups for the folders. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migration Situation All, I have a situation here. I'm in the process of migrating my public folders over from 5.5 to E2K. There is one thing that I'm not too sure of. On our Exchange 5.5 public folders we used distribution lists for access to certain public folders. So my questions to everyone is, how can I keep the same security on these folders when I move them over to E2K? Cause I'm aware that the DL's won't transfer over when I move the folders over. What is the best way to accomplish this? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
Tried specifying the Exchange server as the smart host? -Original Message- From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange I am trying to allow my programmers to develop an application that will mail outside of our local domain. We are running the script on an IIS server. The problem is that while we can deliver to our local domain ,mail going to outside domains fails. Our firewall only allows SMTP connections from our Exchange 2000 servers and it appears that the IIS server is trying to send mail directly to the remote domains. So I think my question is how do I force my IIS server to forward all messages to my Exchange 2000 servers. Obviously I am missing something simple but, danged if I can figure it out. Brian Brian Narkinsky System Manager Department of Environmental Protection MS 6520 2600 Blairstone RD Tallahassee, FL 32399 phone (850)488-1205 fax (850)412-0400 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP log analysis
Read RFCs 821 and 822 and their successors 2821 and 2822 and this will make more sense to you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lindsay Berry Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP log analysis Okay I need an opinion on exactly what is going on in this log file. Just a fresh opinion to see if I'm just being a bonehead. Thanks in advance... 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 EHLO - aus-exch-01.ztechinc.com 0 0 4 0 125 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250-wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com 0 0 31 0 266 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 MAIL - FROM:+SIZE=3169 0 0 4 0 266 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Sender++and+extensions+(SIZE=3169)+Ok 0 0 43 0 407 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 RCPT - TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0 4 0 407 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Recipient++Ok[EMAIL PROTECTED]+Ok mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0 39 0 547 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 DATA - - 0 0 4 0 547 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:29 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 354+Ok+Send+data+ending+with+CRLF.CRLF 0 0 42 0 672 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 250+Message+received:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0 98 0 2000 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 QUIT - - 0 0 4 0 2000 SMTP - - - - 2002-06-03 09:29:30 wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 AUS-EXCH-01 - 25 - - 221+wmpmta04-app.mail-store.com+ESMTP+server+closing+connection 0 0 63 0 2125 SMTP - - - - .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating multiple mailboxes
Exchange 5.5: - Directory Import - Script (e.g. VB Script) Exchange 2000: - LDIDFE Tool - CSVDE Tool - Script (e.g. VB Script) using CDOEXM Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Robert Jan Duyverman Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Creating multiple mailboxes Can anyone tell me what the possibilities are to create multiple mailboxes at once (for example import functions)? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
He's a bit slow. And he likes looking at the pretty blue lights on the front. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems It takes you that long??? Or are you including removing it from the box? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LDAP Queries for Mac Clients
Since installing my 1st exchange 2000 server, my mac clients are having problems performing ldap queries to resolve users names. etc. They are pointing to the AD/GC Server on port 389, but, queries are not working like they did in a total 5.5 site. Anyone had any problems with mac clients? rON _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP Queries for Mac Clients
What mail client would these Macs be using? -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP Queries for Mac Clients Since installing my 1st exchange 2000 server, my mac clients are having problems performing ldap queries to resolve users names. etc. They are pointing to the AD/GC Server on port 389, but, queries are not working like they did in a total 5.5 site. Anyone had any problems with mac clients? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
I just wanted to correct my earlier post. Sorry if I led anyone astray. OWA and other web clients running WebDav might encounter problems with some legacy proxy server's detecting the WebDav http verbs and not forward them. However you should not experience this problem locally. The IIS SMTP server is merely a relay agent. I suspect Chris is correct in his response (I have no idea what he means though). The Win2k CDO object model does NOT allow you to tell CDO what server to use to send mail out. MAPI will by default send it out using your mail profile and hence your SMTP server. Once again I apologize for my mistake. --Felicity Tried specifying the Exchange server as the smart host? -Original Message- From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange I am trying to allow my programmers to develop an application that will mail outside of our local domain. We are running the script on an IIS server. The problem is that while we can deliver to our local domain ,mail going to outside domains fails. Our firewall only allows SMTP connections from our Exchange 2000 servers and it appears that the IIS server is trying to send mail directly to the remote domains. So I think my question is how do I force my IIS server to forward all messages to my Exchange 2000 servers. Obviously I am missing something simple but, danged if I can figure it out. Brian Brian Narkinsky System Manager Department of Environmental Protection MS 6520 2600 Blairstone RD Tallahassee, FL 32399 phone (850)488-1205 fax (850)412-0400 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP Queries for Mac Clients
They are using Eudora -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Queries for Mac Clients What mail client would these Macs be using? -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP Queries for Mac Clients Since installing my 1st exchange 2000 server, my mac clients are having problems performing ldap queries to resolve users names. etc. They are pointing to the AD/GC Server on port 389, but, queries are not working like they did in a total 5.5 site. Anyone had any problems with mac clients? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Goal count is already up to 31. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? It'll be Germany over Italy 1-nil on penalty shots. In the entire World Cup there will be a grand total of 22 goals. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ward, Stuart Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I think Italy... England messed up their chances over the weekend... Stu ExPat Brit -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
Q297988 ;) I suspect Chris is correct in his response (I have no idea what he means though). _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
We've just brought our new volunteer fire dept[1] into operation this past weekend. Looks like it's going to busy summer ... [1] outside of Maricopa - south of Phoenix. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Where is everyone? Got plenty of that here - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:43 PM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Phoenix, AZ. Send rain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ?
If you're in Florida, there's no worries ... 23% is a passing grade. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? Ok..sure make fun of my mathNext it'll be my typing then my Spelling... Wait that's ok I think Im from the era of New Math. -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? Shouldn't it be 11,000? Going from 2Meg to 22Gig. Or did you mean a 2Gig file? Bottom line though, is it depends. Machine, Network, time of day, etc all will effect the speed. As Bill suggested try a smaller file and do the math to get an estimate. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? Take a simple like 2MB excel file transfer from one server to the other. Time it. Multiply by 11, then add in some extra I like 20% you should have about the right time then bill -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? DO you have any ideas how long it take to move all mailbox (move Mailbox method) from an ex 5.5 server to an ex 2000 server on a Switcher network ? Any approximative number ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where is everyone?
Wrong .. so far 31 goals have been scored. Equador will beat Saudi Arabia in the finals :) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:48 PM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? It'll be Germany over Italy 1-nil on penalty shots. In the entire World Cup there will be a grand total of 22 goals. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ward, Stuart Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I think Italy... England messed up their chances over the weekend... Stu ExPat Brit -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Don't all of the 32 teams have their own goal? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? It'll be Germany over Italy 1-nil on penalty shots. In the entire World Cup there will be a grand total of 22 goals. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ward, Stuart Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I think Italy... England messed up their chances over the weekend... Stu ExPat Brit -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
It takes him 5 minutes to fix what the Cisco guys that installed it did wrong. Oh and he has to disable MailGuard too. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems It takes you that long??? Or are you including removing it from the box? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ?
NE I hang my head in shame... BSEE does no good anymore...etc... Though I do remember the time it took me 6 pages of higher math to prove 3=4 ah..diff eq's -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? If you're in Florida, there's no worries ... 23% is a passing grade. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? Ok..sure make fun of my mathNext it'll be my typing then my Spelling... Wait that's ok I think Im from the era of New Math. -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? Shouldn't it be 11,000? Going from 2Meg to 22Gig. Or did you mean a 2Gig file? Bottom line though, is it depends. Machine, Network, time of day, etc all will effect the speed. As Bill suggested try a smaller file and do the math to get an estimate. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? Take a simple like 2MB excel file transfer from one server to the other. Time it. Multiply by 11, then add in some extra I like 20% you should have about the right time then bill -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: move mailbox 22 GB priv.edb, how long ? DO you have any ideas how long it take to move all mailbox (move Mailbox method) from an ex 5.5 server to an ex 2000 server on a Switcher network ? Any approximative number ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
I think you have that number mixed up with the number of guys falling down and crying. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Goal count is already up to 31. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? It'll be Germany over Italy 1-nil on penalty shots. In the entire World Cup there will be a grand total of 22 goals. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ward, Stuart Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I think Italy... England messed up their chances over the weekend... Stu ExPat Brit -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
It's a VPN Concentrator not the PIX. The PIX takes 10 minutes after fixing what Cisco enables... :o) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems It takes him 5 minutes to fix what the Cisco guys that installed it did wrong. Oh and he has to disable MailGuard too. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems It takes you that long??? Or are you including removing it from the box? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IIS QUESTION
Here is the scenario. i have serverA, serverB and SERVERC(LOG FILE SERVER) I need to redirect all the websites log files from serverA and ServerB to serverC. In IIS5.0 when you go into the logfile properties and try to change the patch to a mapped drive it clearly says mapped drives and UNC paths are not supported. But in winNT4.0 it is supported. So i go into the logfile properties on serverA and serverB and change the logfile path from %systemroot%\system32\logfiles to f:\logfiles(mapped drive to serverC) it accepts the path but records event id:2 cannot create folder and cannot write to drive errors. I looked it up and the article says that IIS will write logfiles with the logged on username meaning the account you use for iisadmin service account and if that account doesnt have rights on the path it will try and use the system account. When i go to serverA and serverB and look at the iis admin service it is using the system account and i am trying to change it to my account but the options are dimmed out meaning i cannot change the service account from system to m y user id. I tried this hoping that if i use my user id as the service account then my account has administrative rights on the log file server and i would be ok now that i cannot change the logon account my only option is to give the system accounts from serverA and serverB administrative rights on serverC but i cannot find the system account in user manager for serverA and serverB. I have looked on my pdc and bdc and i can see the system account but on my serverA and serverB which are member servers i dont see the system account, if i can see the system account on serverA and serverB then i can add them to the administrators group on serverC but i dont even see them... ANY IDEAS??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Yup. Way too dry. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanborn, John Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? We've just brought our new volunteer fire dept[1] into operation this past weekend. Looks like it's going to busy summer ... [1] outside of Maricopa - south of Phoenix. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Where is everyone? Got plenty of that here - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:43 PM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Phoenix, AZ. Send rain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IIS QUESTION
Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as logging to a file. IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are reading must be incorrect. A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process. So entries are flushed to disk when processor cycles permit. ODBC logging will degrade performance on your server as it is more of a synchronous process and as such prone to locking. I suggest you write to disk and then use a perl script to merge the log files. --Felicity Here is the scenario. i have serverA, serverB and SERVERC(LOG FILE = SERVER) I need to redirect all the websites log files from serverA and ServerB = to serverC. In IIS5.0 when you go into the logfile properties and try to change the = patch to a mapped drive it clearly says mapped drives and UNC paths are = not supported. But in winNT4.0 it is supported. So i go into the logfile = properties on serverA and serverB and change the logfile path from = %systemroot%\system32\logfiles to f:\logfiles(mapped drive to serverC) = it accepts the path but records event id:2 cannot create folder and = cannot write to drive errors. I looked it up and the article says that = IIS will write logfiles with the logged on username meaning the account = you use for iisadmin service account and if that account doesnt have = rights on the path it will try and use the system account. When i go to = serverA and serverB and look at the iis admin service it is using the = system account and i am trying to change it to my account but the = options are dimmed out meaning i cannot change the service account from = system to m y user id. I tried this hoping that if i use my user id as = the service account then my account has administrative rights on the log = file server and i would be ok now that i cannot change the logon account = my only option is to give the system accounts from serverA and serverB = administrative rights on serverC but i cannot find the system account in = user manager for serverA and serverB. I have looked on my pdc and bdc = and i can see the system account but on my serverA and serverB which are = member servers i dont see the system account, if i can see the system = account on serverA and serverB then i can add them to the administrators = group on serverC but i dont even see them... ANY IDEAS??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migration Situation
What I'm asking is what is the best way to set that back up on the E2K side? I know they won't come over. I'm just asking what is the best way to manage the permissions on the PF's in E2K. And to get everyone back to having the same permissions to the same folders once they are moved over. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migration Situation They won't? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migration Situation All, I have a situation here. I'm in the process of migrating my public folders over from 5.5 to E2K. There is one thing that I'm not too sure of. On our Exchange 5.5 public folders we used distribution lists for access to certain public folders. So my questions to everyone is, how can I keep the same security on these folders when I move them over to E2K? Cause I'm aware that the DL's won't transfer over when I move the folders over. What is the best way to accomplish this? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS QUESTION
i cannot take that risk that comes along with the odbc logging i thought about it, these are highly visible websites in my organisation and a lot of traffic. I am thinking of just writing them to the local disk and then copy them to the logfile server every night with a batch file before the webtrends prog runs to analyse the logs. thx -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS QUESTION Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as logging to a file. IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are reading must be incorrect. A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process. So entries are flushed to disk when processor cycles permit. ODBC logging will degrade performance on your server as it is more of a synchronous process and as such prone to locking. I suggest you write to disk and then use a perl script to merge the log files. --Felicity Here is the scenario. i have serverA, serverB and SERVERC(LOG FILE = SERVER) I need to redirect all the websites log files from serverA and ServerB = to serverC. In IIS5.0 when you go into the logfile properties and try to change the = patch to a mapped drive it clearly says mapped drives and UNC paths are = not supported. But in winNT4.0 it is supported. So i go into the logfile = properties on serverA and serverB and change the logfile path from = %systemroot%\system32\logfiles to f:\logfiles(mapped drive to serverC) = it accepts the path but records event id:2 cannot create folder and = cannot write to drive errors. I looked it up and the article says that = IIS will write logfiles with the logged on username meaning the account = you use for iisadmin service account and if that account doesnt have = rights on the path it will try and use the system account. When i go to = serverA and serverB and look at the iis admin service it is using the = system account and i am trying to change it to my account but the = options are dimmed out meaning i cannot change the service account from = system to m y user id. I tried this hoping that if i use my user id as = the service account then my account has administrative rights on the log = file server and i would be ok now that i cannot change the logon account = my only option is to give the system accounts from serverA and serverB = administrative rights on serverC but i cannot find the system account in = user manager for serverA and serverB. I have looked on my pdc and bdc = and i can see the system account but on my serverA and serverB which are = member servers i dont see the system account, if i can see the system = account on serverA and serverB then i can add them to the administrators = group on serverC but i dont even see them... ANY IDEAS??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS QUESTION
Also in win2k iis services can be run with any account it does not have to be the system account. The system account limitation must be in NT4 only. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS QUESTION Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as logging to a file. IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are reading must be incorrect. A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process. So entries are flushed to disk when processor cycles permit. ODBC logging will degrade performance on your server as it is more of a synchronous process and as such prone to locking. I suggest you write to disk and then use a perl script to merge the log files. --Felicity Here is the scenario. i have serverA, serverB and SERVERC(LOG FILE = SERVER) I need to redirect all the websites log files from serverA and ServerB = to serverC. In IIS5.0 when you go into the logfile properties and try to change the = patch to a mapped drive it clearly says mapped drives and UNC paths are = not supported. But in winNT4.0 it is supported. So i go into the logfile = properties on serverA and serverB and change the logfile path from = %systemroot%\system32\logfiles to f:\logfiles(mapped drive to serverC) = it accepts the path but records event id:2 cannot create folder and = cannot write to drive errors. I looked it up and the article says that = IIS will write logfiles with the logged on username meaning the account = you use for iisadmin service account and if that account doesnt have = rights on the path it will try and use the system account. When i go to = serverA and serverB and look at the iis admin service it is using the = system account and i am trying to change it to my account but the = options are dimmed out meaning i cannot change the service account from = system to m y user id. I tried this hoping that if i use my user id as = the service account then my account has administrative rights on the log = file server and i would be ok now that i cannot change the logon account = my only option is to give the system accounts from serverA and serverB = administrative rights on serverC but i cannot find the system account in = user manager for serverA and serverB. I have looked on my pdc and bdc = and i can see the system account but on my serverA and serverB which are = member servers i dont see the system account, if i can see the system = account on serverA and serverB then i can add them to the administrators = group on serverC but i dont even see them... ANY IDEAS??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS QUESTION
Webtrends can simply retrieve the log files, you don't need to write a batch file. You might also want to move this discussion over to http://www.15seconds.com/listserv.htm, an IIS5 list where it is more on topic. Also, if this is a public website, I would not have them as member servers of your internal domain -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION i cannot take that risk that comes along with the odbc logging i thought about it, these are highly visible websites in my organisation and a lot of traffic. I am thinking of just writing them to the local disk and then copy them to the logfile server every night with a batch file before the webtrends prog runs to analyse the logs. thx -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS QUESTION Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as logging to a file. IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are reading must be incorrect. A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process. So entries are flushed to disk when processor cycles permit. ODBC logging will degrade performance on your server as it is more of a synchronous process and as such prone to locking. I suggest you write to disk and then use a perl script to merge the log files. --Felicity Here is the scenario. i have serverA, serverB and SERVERC(LOG FILE = SERVER) I need to redirect all the websites log files from serverA and ServerB = to serverC. In IIS5.0 when you go into the logfile properties and try to change the = patch to a mapped drive it clearly says mapped drives and UNC paths are = not supported. But in winNT4.0 it is supported. So i go into the logfile = properties on serverA and serverB and change the logfile path from = %systemroot%\system32\logfiles to f:\logfiles(mapped drive to serverC) = it accepts the path but records event id:2 cannot create folder and = cannot write to drive errors. I looked it up and the article says that = IIS will write logfiles with the logged on username meaning the account = you use for iisadmin service account and if that account doesnt have = rights on the path it will try and use the system account. When i go to = serverA and serverB and look at the iis admin service it is using the = system account and i am trying to change it to my account but the = options are dimmed out meaning i cannot change the service account from = system to m y user id. I tried this hoping that if i use my user id as = the service account then my account has administrative rights on the log = file server and i would be ok now that i cannot change the logon account = my only option is to give the system accounts from serverA and serverB = administrative rights on serverC but i cannot find the system account in = user manager for serverA and serverB. I have looked on my pdc and bdc = and i can see the system account but on my serverA and serverB which are = member servers i dont see the system account, if i can see the system = account on serverA and serverB then i can add them to the administrators = group on serverC but i dont even see them... ANY IDEAS??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migration Situation
I guess there's not enough information in your post for anyone else to determine whether they would or would not migrate. The same lack of information precludes me from offering a suggestion as to how best deal with an issue which may or may not exist. My DLs migrated just fine BTW. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migration Situation What I'm asking is what is the best way to set that back up on the E2K side? I know they won't come over. I'm just asking what is the best way to manage the permissions on the PF's in E2K. And to get everyone back to having the same permissions to the same folders once they are moved over. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migration Situation They won't? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migration Situation All, I have a situation here. I'm in the process of migrating my public folders over from 5.5 to E2K. There is one thing that I'm not too sure of. On our Exchange 5.5 public folders we used distribution lists for access to certain public folders. So my questions to everyone is, how can I keep the same security on these folders when I move them over to E2K? Cause I'm aware that the DL's won't transfer over when I move the folders over. What is the best way to accomplish this? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS QUESTION
dude read thw whole message before answering..not trying to be rude.i know i dont need a batch file for web trends..if you read my entire problem you would have known what i was trying to accomplish, if you have any ideas for my problem i will appreciate it. thx -Original Message- From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION Webtrends can simply retrieve the log files, you don't need to write a batch file. You might also want to move this discussion over to http://www.15seconds.com/listserv.htm, an IIS5 list where it is more on topic. Also, if this is a public website, I would not have them as member servers of your internal domain -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS QUESTION i cannot take that risk that comes along with the odbc logging i thought about it, these are highly visible websites in my organisation and a lot of traffic. I am thinking of just writing them to the local disk and then copy them to the logfile server every night with a batch file before the webtrends prog runs to analyse the logs. thx -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS QUESTION Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as logging to a file. IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are reading must be incorrect. A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process. So entries are flushed to disk when processor cycles permit. ODBC logging will degrade performance on your server as it is more of a synchronous process and as such prone to locking. I suggest you write to disk and then use a perl script to merge the log files. --Felicity Here is the scenario. i have serverA, serverB and SERVERC(LOG FILE = SERVER) I need to redirect all the websites log files from serverA and ServerB = to serverC. In IIS5.0 when you go into the logfile properties and try to change the = patch to a mapped drive it clearly says mapped drives and UNC paths are = not supported. But in winNT4.0 it is supported. So i go into the logfile = properties on serverA and serverB and change the logfile path from = %systemroot%\system32\logfiles to f:\logfiles(mapped drive to serverC) = it accepts the path but records event id:2 cannot create folder and = cannot write to drive errors. I looked it up and the article says that = IIS will write logfiles with the logged on username meaning the account = you use for iisadmin service account and if that account doesnt have = rights on the path it will try and use the system account. When i go to = serverA and serverB and look at the iis admin service it is using the = system account and i am trying to change it to my account but the = options are dimmed out meaning i cannot change the service account from = system to m y user id. I tried this hoping that if i use my user id as = the service account then my account has administrative rights on the log = file server and i would be ok now that i cannot change the logon account = my only option is to give the system accounts from serverA and serverB = administrative rights on serverC but i cannot find the system account in = user manager for serverA and serverB. I have looked on my pdc and bdc = and i can see the system account but on my serverA and serverB which are = member servers i dont see the system account, if i can see the system = account on serverA and serverB then i can add them to the administrators = group on serverC but i dont even see them... ANY IDEAS??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
