RE: sp3 revisited
Yes, they're cumulative. Neigh. - KC :-) -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
That disk you're taking home with you provides the redundancy in your RAID5 system. Think about what would happen if one of the remaining disks failed! And I'd like to see you try to recover data from one disk in a RAID5 array! Clearly this backup strategy has not been tested and all the ammo you need is to show them that you can't recover the system from one disk. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Tell him there won't be any redundency when he takes the HD. Before fire/flood can happen, you'll probably lose your RAID 5. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMAP Contacts
You should be able to *view* contacts from Outlook as long as Use microsoft rich text format is checked on the IMAP virtual server properties. You won't be able to make updates to them or add new ones however. It will still display as an email folder, but once the items in it are fully downloaded, they will appear as contacts. - KC -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions There is if you use Ximian Evolution. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMAP Contacts Is there any way to view the contacts on the exchange server for a user through IMAP? I tried adding the contacts folder as a subscribed IMAP folder but that just displayed it as an email folder. Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
I was assuming the best... that the spare drive they were taking home was an extra drive assigned the role of hot spare in the array. Maybe hot spares aren't mirrors of anything, I don't know. Jeez you guys are nitpicky... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware In RAID-5 one drive is not a mirror of anything. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W3SVC message in event viewer
Do you have OWA, if yes this might be your OWA. Do you recognize the user name appeared in the error inside your domain ? -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC message in event viewer What account is being used for the w3svc service. and what kind of rights does that account have on he local server an dis it a local account or a domain account that is being used for the w3svc? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC message in event viewer You might get a better response from an IIS or NT list. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Patrick Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 10:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W3SVC message in event viewer I get the following message in Event viewer, The server was unable to logon the Windows NT account due to the following error: Logon failure: unknown username or bad password. I know this is IIS stuff, but I don't know why this message is coming up or what is causing it so any insight would be helpful. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEST
list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST
just quiet -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOA questions
1- Easiest way I can think of is send a message to al users and see which one's send back Out of Office replies. If a tool exists, it's either at www.cdolive.com, www.mail-resources.com [1], or www.slipstick.com. 2- OWA could be used, but it amounts to the same thing as logging into the user's mailbox. You could turn off auto-replies to the internet at your IMS [2] to block all of them. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] No promotional fees were paid to the sender for this blatant plug. [3] [2] Generally accepted as a Good Idea! [3] Hi, Chris! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOA questions EX 55/SP4, NT4/SP6 1- Is there a way/tool to find out which mailboxes are setup with Out of Office message at any given time? 2- Is there a way/tool to modify it (e.g. turn it off), right from the Exchange Administrator and without having to log in to user's mailbox? Can OWA be used to do this? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Custom Recipient / Pagers
We have 500 pagers setup as custom recipients on our Exchange 5.5 server. When trying to add a new custom recipient for a particular pager, I receive an error message that the address already exist. Is there any way to do a search on SMTP addresses, so I can find out who is using this address, or do I have to manually click on all 500 custom recipients until I find the correct one? Mercy, please say it isn't so. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers
Enter it into a new mail message and let the name resolve or hit Alt + K and it will resolve to the owner. Judi McLane -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Custom Recipient / Pagers We have 500 pagers setup as custom recipients on our Exchange 5.5 server. When trying to add a new custom recipient for a particular pager, I receive an error message that the address already exist. Is there any way to do a search on SMTP addresses, so I can find out who is using this address, or do I have to manually click on all 500 custom recipients until I find the correct one? Mercy, please say it isn't so. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers
You could run a directory export and then search the output file. Alternatively you could run an ldap search against the directory with a search filter like this: (|(rfc822Mailbox=smtpaddr)(otherMailbox=smtpaddr)) Tony -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 17. September 2002 14:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Custom Recipient / Pagers We have 500 pagers setup as custom recipients on our Exchange 5.5 server. When trying to add a new custom recipient for a particular pager, I receive an error message that the address already exist. Is there any way to do a search on SMTP addresses, so I can find out who is using this address, or do I have to manually click on all 500 custom recipients until I find the correct one? Mercy, please say it isn't so. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers
Enter the SMTP address, Ctrl-K to resolve it. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Custom Recipient / Pagers We have 500 pagers setup as custom recipients on our Exchange 5.5 server. When trying to add a new custom recipient for a particular pager, I receive an error message that the address already exist. Is there any way to do a search on SMTP addresses, so I can find out who is using this address, or do I have to manually click on all 500 custom recipients until I find the correct one? Mercy, please say it isn't so. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers
Holy easy. That worked great. Thanks ma'am. Robert -Original Message- From: Judi McLane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers Enter it into a new mail message and let the name resolve or hit Alt + K and it will resolve to the owner. Judi McLane -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Custom Recipient / Pagers We have 500 pagers setup as custom recipients on our Exchange 5.5 server. When trying to add a new custom recipient for a particular pager, I receive an error message that the address already exist. Is there any way to do a search on SMTP addresses, so I can find out who is using this address, or do I have to manually click on all 500 custom recipients until I find the correct one? Mercy, please say it isn't so. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST
It's not dead, it's just resting. -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 12:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOA questions
www.ecora.com has a reporting tool that digs all the way down to mailbox container, but not sure if it will show the OOA setting. You might want to give them a call. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOA questions EX 55/SP4, NT4/SP6 1- Is there a way/tool to find out which mailboxes are setup with Out of Office message at any given time? 2- Is there a way/tool to modify it (e.g. turn it off), right from the Exchange Administrator and without having to log in to user's mailbox? Can OWA be used to do this? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Directory Access
Julian, you beat me to it. But you are 5 hours ahead :) -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Directory Access Depending on if you have your users split into separate OU's, then you can set the AD attribute MsExchQueryBaseDN to only search against specified OU's. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 00:40 am To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Directory Access Does OWA use some other method for directory lookups of names other then the GAL? What I am trying to accomplish is limiting 1/2 of the users from doing any name search on any other users on the same E2K system. When I set the permissions for the security group that conatin this 1/2 of the users to deny for all attributes. The users can still search for other users by name. What could be causing this? System E2K SP2 front-end back-end topology Win 2 K Avd server - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Directory Access
:) Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Directory Access Julian, you beat me to it. But you are 5 hours ahead :) -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Directory Access Depending on if you have your users split into separate OU's, then you can set the AD attribute MsExchQueryBaseDN to only search against specified OU's. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 00:40 am To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Directory Access Does OWA use some other method for directory lookups of names other then the GAL? What I am trying to accomplish is limiting 1/2 of the users from doing any name search on any other users on the same E2K system. When I set the permissions for the security group that conatin this 1/2 of the users to deny for all attributes. The users can still search for other users by name. What could be causing this? System E2K SP2 front-end back-end topology Win 2 K Avd server - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple updaters for a DL
I have a related question. In Exchange 2000, when I make someone an owner of a DL (actually a Global Distribution Group OR Global Security Group with e-mail address), it does not work. When the DL's properties are opened in Outlook, the owner is correctly displayed. But that person is not able to add/remove DL members. He gets a pop-up error that he does not have permissions to do that. Anyone else seen this? -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL I'm not quite sure now. Oh, Missy? Have you met Chris? I think you two would get along famously. humor-challenged Yes, I'm aware that Chris and Missy have attended several MEC events, and have probably met in person. I'm making another of my (in)famous attempts at humor. Please see the archives (and good luck to you) for examples of my previous successes. /humor-challenged - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:04 PM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL Dls can't be owners of DLs. What's the question again? -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL You're killing me, Missy. So, obviously it wasn't Missy who said that a DL couldn't own another. My brilliant facility with logic enables me to deduce that it must've been someone else. Either that, or I've imagined the whole thing. So, first thing in the morning, I'm gonna have another whack at it. On a related note, Missy's second statement about E2K has me somewhat concerned (only somewhat, because I'm the calm, cool, collected type). This leads me to two questions: Isn't this a migration issue? How have other people dealt with this? - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL In 5.5, a DL can own another DL. In E2K, it cannot. - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:56 PM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL That's what I thought. However, I couldn't make it happen. I seem to remember a post from some expert (you? Chris Scharff? Missy? Daniel? Oh, dear, that's gonna drive me nuts) saying that a DL couldn't be the owner of another DL. Hoping that this wasn't true, I tried it again and again. It seems to be true. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:28 AM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL I thought the way to do it was to put the DL in the Owner field for the list. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Murray Alexander Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple updaters for a DL In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives... EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a: I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL. We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the former. Each Exchange mailbox is associated with a PEOPLE domain account. I created a NT Global Group (DLADMINS) that contains the NT accounts associated with the mailboxes of those who need update privileges. Then, in Exchange Administrator, I added that group, with User privileges, to the Permissions page of DLs that needed attention from these people. I know I've seen posts from others asking about this, but can't remember if anyone had a solution. If you did all this months ago and posted your findings, when did you do that? I've been keeping my own archive for about a year, and couldn't find it. If you know how to get to the archives, please give me lots of details off-line. Despite some foot-in-mouth postings earlier, I consider myself reasonably intelligent. I really do want to understand this stuff. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Backup Hardware
If it is a spare then it is blank! -Original Message- From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware I was assuming the best... that the spare drive they were taking home was an extra drive assigned the role of hot spare in the array. Maybe hot spares aren't mirrors of anything, I don't know. Jeez you guys are nitpicky... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware In RAID-5 one drive is not a mirror of anything. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple updaters for a DL
Missy still talks to anyone who will listen about our first in person meeting. -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL I'm not quite sure now. Oh, Missy? Have you met Chris? I think you two would get along famously. humor-challenged Yes, I'm aware that Chris and Missy have attended several MEC events, and have probably met in person. I'm making another of my (in)famous attempts at humor. Please see the archives (and good luck to you) for examples of my previous successes. /humor-challenged - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:04 PM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL Dls can't be owners of DLs. What's the question again? -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL You're killing me, Missy. So, obviously it wasn't Missy who said that a DL couldn't own another. My brilliant facility with logic enables me to deduce that it must've been someone else. Either that, or I've imagined the whole thing. So, first thing in the morning, I'm gonna have another whack at it. On a related note, Missy's second statement about E2K has me somewhat concerned (only somewhat, because I'm the calm, cool, collected type). This leads me to two questions: Isn't this a migration issue? How have other people dealt with this? - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL In 5.5, a DL can own another DL. In E2K, it cannot. - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:56 PM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL That's what I thought. However, I couldn't make it happen. I seem to remember a post from some expert (you? Chris Scharff? Missy? Daniel? Oh, dear, that's gonna drive me nuts) saying that a DL couldn't be the owner of another DL. Hoping that this wasn't true, I tried it again and again. It seems to be true. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:28 AM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL I thought the way to do it was to put the DL in the Owner field for the list. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Murray Alexander Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple updaters for a DL In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives... EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a: I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL. We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the former. Each Exchange mailbox is associated with a PEOPLE domain account. I created a NT Global Group (DLADMINS) that contains the NT accounts associated with the mailboxes of those who need update privileges. Then, in Exchange Administrator, I added that group, with User privileges, to the Permissions page of DLs that needed attention from these people. I know I've seen posts from others asking about this, but can't remember if anyone had a solution. If you did all this months ago and posted your findings, when did you do that? I've been keeping my own archive for about a year, and couldn't find it. If you know how to get to the archives, please give me lots of details off-line. Despite some foot-in-mouth postings earlier, I consider myself reasonably intelligent. I really do want to understand this stuff. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: Multiple updaters for a DL
Yeah they need an additonal right set on the permissions tab of the DL object, I think there's a technet article on this. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL I have a related question. In Exchange 2000, when I make someone an owner of a DL (actually a Global Distribution Group OR Global Security Group with e-mail address), it does not work. When the DL's properties are opened in Outlook, the owner is correctly displayed. But that person is not able to add/remove DL members. He gets a pop-up error that he does not have permissions to do that. Anyone else seen this? -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL I'm not quite sure now. Oh, Missy? Have you met Chris? I think you two would get along famously. humor-challenged Yes, I'm aware that Chris and Missy have attended several MEC events, and have probably met in person. I'm making another of my (in)famous attempts at humor. Please see the archives (and good luck to you) for examples of my previous successes. /humor-challenged - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:04 PM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL Dls can't be owners of DLs. What's the question again? -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL You're killing me, Missy. So, obviously it wasn't Missy who said that a DL couldn't own another. My brilliant facility with logic enables me to deduce that it must've been someone else. Either that, or I've imagined the whole thing. So, first thing in the morning, I'm gonna have another whack at it. On a related note, Missy's second statement about E2K has me somewhat concerned (only somewhat, because I'm the calm, cool, collected type). This leads me to two questions: Isn't this a migration issue? How have other people dealt with this? - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL In 5.5, a DL can own another DL. In E2K, it cannot. - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:56 PM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL That's what I thought. However, I couldn't make it happen. I seem to remember a post from some expert (you? Chris Scharff? Missy? Daniel? Oh, dear, that's gonna drive me nuts) saying that a DL couldn't be the owner of another DL. Hoping that this wasn't true, I tried it again and again. It seems to be true. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:28 AM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL I thought the way to do it was to put the DL in the Owner field for the list. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Murray Alexander Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple updaters for a DL In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives... EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a: I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL. We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the former. Each Exchange mailbox is associated with a PEOPLE domain account. I created a NT Global Group (DLADMINS) that contains the NT accounts associated with the mailboxes of those who need update privileges. Then, in Exchange Administrator, I added that group, with User privileges, to the Permissions page of DLs that needed attention from these people. I know I've seen posts from others asking about this, but can't remember if anyone had a solution. If you did all this months ago and posted your findings, when did you do that? I've been keeping my own archive for about a year, and couldn't find it.
RE: OWA 2000 Logon field..
Is it that complicated? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Logon field.. I know a couple of talented developers who'd likely have time to work on such a project after MEC. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 2000 Logon field.. Hi all, I believe this has been asked before. I searched through the archives but I couldn't find it... Basically I need to have an OWA 5.5 style logon box so users can enter their mailbox alias. I need it because some users have multiple mailboxes associated to them. I know I can use http://[exchange.ip]/exchange/[alias_name], but the users won't remember. Any ideas? Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 2000 Logon field..
Not sure if you want to do this but OWA 5.5 lives with E2K, but you will lose all the cool fixes in OWA 2000. But at least you will get your login displayed as you like it. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Logon field.. Is it that complicated? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Logon field.. I know a couple of talented developers who'd likely have time to work on such a project after MEC. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 2000 Logon field.. Hi all, I believe this has been asked before. I searched through the archives but I couldn't find it... Basically I need to have an OWA 5.5 style logon box so users can enter their mailbox alias. I need it because some users have multiple mailboxes associated to them. I know I can use http://[exchange.ip]/exchange/[alias_name], but the users won't remember. Any ideas? Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
Read the message once again.NOT ME -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware That disk you're taking home with you provides the redundancy in your RAID5 system. Think about what would happen if one of the remaining disks failed! And I'd like to see you try to recover data from one disk in a RAID5 array! Clearly this backup strategy has not been tested and all the ammo you need is to show them that you can't recover the system from one disk. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Tell him there won't be any redundency when he takes the HD. Before fire/flood can happen, you'll probably lose your RAID 5. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOA questions
Ok so a 3rd party tool is needed. 1- Maybe it's easy, but it's not a very efficient method. But thanks, I'll check those sites. 2- OWA would work best when user is away and has no access to his/her computer. Maybe I'm wrong but doesn't turning off the auto-replies disables generating auto-reply and not the Out-of-Office messages and only to the Internet? This would have no effect on internal emails. --Alex -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions 1- Easiest way I can think of is send a message to al users and see which one's send back Out of Office replies. If a tool exists, it's either at www.cdolive.com, www.mail-resources.com [1], or www.slipstick.com. 2- OWA could be used, but it amounts to the same thing as logging into the user's mailbox. You could turn off auto-replies to the internet at your IMS [2] to block all of them. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] No promotional fees were paid to the sender for this blatant plug. [3] [2] Generally accepted as a Good Idea! [3] Hi, Chris! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOA questions EX 55/SP4, NT4/SP6 1- Is there a way/tool to find out which mailboxes are setup with Out of Office message at any given time? 2- Is there a way/tool to modify it (e.g. turn it off), right from the Exchange Administrator and without having to log in to user's mailbox? Can OWA be used to do this? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forward/ Reverse Domain Lookup - Blocking Mail
Anyone here know how to configure Exchange to block email that originates from a domain that fails a forward and reverse DNS lookup? Any help would be appreciate. Thanks all. Config: Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 Winnt 4.0 SP6a _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient Name not recognized.
When an appointment is scheduled for a user (harveye), I receive the following error message saying that harvey1 could not be reached. Harvey1 was a second mailbox for the user which has been deleted. If I click on the properties of the harveye mailbox, it is associated with the primary windows NT account of harveye (not harvey1), just like it should be. I can't figure out why scheduling an appointment with Harvey returns an error about trying to reach harvey1. I have ran the Consistency Adjuster several times since deleting the harvey1 mailbox, and even reselected the primary windows NT account of harveye. Anybody had this problem before? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Again Sent: 09/17/2002 12:30 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: harvey1 on 09/17/2002 12:31 PM The recipient name is not recognized _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
end of life / support from Microsoft
hi, can someone please point me to information on when microsoft will stop supporting versions of a product (specifically Exchange 5.5)? thanks, mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST
Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: end of life / support from Microsoft
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;en-us;lifecycle Typically MS offers support for current product + one previous version. -Original Message- From: Herb, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: end of life / support from Microsoft hi, can someone please point me to information on when microsoft will stop supporting versions of a product (specifically Exchange 5.5)? thanks, mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST
He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
Biotch. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:20 AM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL Missy still talks to anyone who will listen about our first in person meeting. -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL I'm not quite sure now. Oh, Missy? Have you met Chris? I think you two would get along famously. humor-challenged Yes, I'm aware that Chris and Missy have attended several MEC events, and have probably met in person. I'm making another of my (in)famous attempts at humor. Please see the archives (and good luck to you) for examples of my previous successes. /humor-challenged - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:04 PM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL Dls can't be owners of DLs. What's the question again? -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL You're killing me, Missy. So, obviously it wasn't Missy who said that a DL couldn't own another. My brilliant facility with logic enables me to deduce that it must've been someone else. Either that, or I've imagined the whole thing. So, first thing in the morning, I'm gonna have another whack at it. On a related note, Missy's second statement about E2K has me somewhat concerned (only somewhat, because I'm the calm, cool, collected type). This leads me to two questions: Isn't this a migration issue? How have other people dealt with this? - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL In 5.5, a DL can own another DL. In E2K, it cannot. - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:56 PM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL That's what I thought. However, I couldn't make it happen. I seem to remember a post from some expert (you? Chris Scharff? Missy? Daniel? Oh, dear, that's gonna drive me nuts) saying that a DL couldn't be the owner of another DL. Hoping that this wasn't true, I tried it again and again. It seems to be true. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:28 AM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL I thought the way to do it was to put the DL in the Owner field for the list. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Murray Alexander Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple updaters for a DL In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives... EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a: I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL. We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the former. Each Exchange mailbox is associated with a PEOPLE domain account. I created a NT Global Group (DLADMINS) that contains the NT accounts associated with the mailboxes of those who need update privileges. Then, in Exchange Administrator, I added that group, with User privileges, to the Permissions page of DLs that needed attention from these people. I know I've seen posts from others asking about this, but can't remember if anyone had a solution. If you did all this months ago and posted your findings, when did you do that? I've been keeping my own archive for about a year, and couldn't find it. If you know how to get to the archives, please give me lots of details off-line. Despite some foot-in-mouth postings earlier, I consider myself reasonably intelligent. I really do want to understand this stuff. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: TEST - Answer
Maybe we should get a little more specific on the answersWhat are various level of data storage? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
Heck, I'm 9 months pregnant, and, apparently I've lost my mind. I guess Chris is right and I'm wrong. My bad. M - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:39 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL Well, I tried making a DL the owner of another DL. I got a pop-up window telling me, quite explicity, that one DL cannot own another. It then suggested that I select another account. It may have suggested a mailbox, but I can't be sure. I was too busy pounding the desk in triumph. It was bittersweet, though. I really did want it to work. So, how do you make it work, Missy? I'm also interested in how to make a DL the owner of a mailbox. I didn't think that was possible, either. I think I've got the one-to-one thing sorted out, but I'll check that, too. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 5:54 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL It is indeed a migration issue. It's dealt with by going through the 5.5 directory and identifying mailboxes that are owned by DL's and reassigning them to *unique* accounts. (Remember that there is a one-to-one association between AD accounts mailboxes in E2K, so no account can be the primary NT account for 1 mailbox.) Missy - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 1:53 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL You're killing me, Missy. So, obviously it wasn't Missy who said that a DL couldn't own another. My brilliant facility with logic enables me to deduce that it must've been someone else. Either that, or I've imagined the whole thing. So, first thing in the morning, I'm gonna have another whack at it. On a related note, Missy's second statement about E2K has me somewhat concerned (only somewhat, because I'm the calm, cool, collected type). This leads me to two questions: Isn't this a migration issue? How have other people dealt with this? - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL In 5.5, a DL can own another DL. In E2K, it cannot. - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:56 PM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL That's what I thought. However, I couldn't make it happen. I seem to remember a post from some expert (you? Chris Scharff? Missy? Daniel? Oh, dear, that's gonna drive me nuts) saying that a DL couldn't be the owner of another DL. Hoping that this wasn't true, I tried it again and again. It seems to be true. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:28 AM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL I thought the way to do it was to put the DL in the Owner field for the list. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Murray Alexander Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple updaters for a DL In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives... EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a: I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL. We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the former. Each Exchange mailbox is associated with a PEOPLE domain account. I created a NT Global Group (DLADMINS) that contains the NT accounts associated with the mailboxes of those who need update privileges. Then, in Exchange Administrator, I added that group, with User privileges, to the Permissions page of DLs that needed attention from these people. I know I've seen posts from others asking about this, but can't remember if anyone had a solution. If you did all this months ago and posted your findings, when did you do that? I've been keeping my own archive for about a year, and couldn't find it. If you know how to get to the archives, please give me lots of details off-line. Despite some foot-in-mouth postings earlier, I consider myself reasonably intelligent. I really do want to understand this stuff. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: TEST - Answer
Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
No, that would be the answer for RAID1, RAID1, RAID 0+1 -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
sorry but your answer reference is incorrect for the answer. For Bonus...100points... the correct reference would be what? fro this list? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Maybe we should get a little more specific on the answersWhat are various level of data storage? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
Sorry that is a question..and I though we where doing answers with the other parties stating the question... So far Jeff Waters has a 100point for the right question to the answer... will he risk it and go for the bonus? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
only if you will hum the theme song -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Sorry that is a question..and I though we where doing answers with the other parties stating the question... So far Jeff Waters has a 100point for the right question to the answer... will he risk it and go for the bonus? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: TEST - Answer
What is turning around and going back home? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Dugas Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Re: TEST - Answer
What is Exchange Hell? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 13:23 Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: TEST - Answer
This thread. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: TEST - Answer What is Exchange Hell? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 13:23 Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: TEST - Answer
it is almost as bad as taco Fridays -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 17 September, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer This thread. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: TEST - Answer What is Exchange Hell? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 13:23 Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: TEST - Answer
I'm sure it could get worse. New answer. A boss that thinks he knows something about computers and tries to tell you how to do things yet he has a hard time with the right clicking concept -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer This thread. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: TEST - Answer What is Exchange Hell? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 13:23 Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
Re: TEST - Answer
Exchange 2000, answering questions, and fish tacos - Original Message - From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:18 AM Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Sorry that is a question..and I though we where doing answers with the other parties stating the question... So far Jeff Waters has a 100point for the right question to the answer... will he risk it and go for the bonus? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
What is a PHB? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer I'm sure it could get worse. New answer. A boss that thinks he knows something about computers and tries to tell you how to do things yet he has a hard time with the right clicking concept -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer This thread. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: TEST - Answer What is Exchange Hell? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 13:23 Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: TEST - Answer
What is My Boss Too? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer I'm sure it could get worse. New answer. A boss that thinks he knows something about computers and tries to tell you how to do things yet he has a hard time with the right clicking concept -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer This thread. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: TEST - Answer What is Exchange Hell? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 13:23 Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
Event 1029
We are starting to move our MSX5.5 mailboxes to an E2K server. Oddly, we are seeing eventlog warnings (not the old event 1016) whenever someone other than the owner accesses the calendar of someone who's mailbox is on the E2K server. The eventlog entry claims the operation failed, but users are able to view the calendar just fine. Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store Event Category: Access Control Event ID: 1029 Date: 9/17/2002 Time: 10:25:05 AM User: N/A Computer: NTS390 Description: [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed an operation because the user did not have the following access rights: 'Delete' 'Read Property' 'Write Property' 'Create Message' 'View Item' 'Create Subfolder' 'Write Security Descriptor' 'Write Owner' 'Read Security Descriptor' 'Contact' The distinguished name of the owning mailbox is /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KCORNET. The folder ID is in the data section of this event. Anyone else getting these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
Ding dingyou win. Let's start with the person that gets the answer right gets to ask the next question. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer What is a PHB? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer I'm sure it could get worse. New answer. A boss that thinks he knows something about computers and tries to tell you how to do things yet he has a hard time with the right clicking concept -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer This thread. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: TEST - Answer What is Exchange Hell? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 13:23 Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: TEST - Answer
But I can't. I thought this thread was a waste of bandwidth... until I knew the answer anyway. Then I thought it was worthwhile for at least my email (no double standard here). I will pass on a follow-up question. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ding dingyou win. Let's start with the person that gets the answer right gets to ask the next question. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer What is a PHB? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer I'm sure it could get worse. New answer. A boss that thinks he knows something about computers and tries to tell you how to do things yet he has a hard time with the right clicking concept -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer This thread. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: TEST - Answer What is Exchange Hell? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 13:23 Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: OOA questions
IIRC, turning off auto-replies to the internet kills both to the internet. You are correct that it would have no effect internally. Then again, my memory isn't what it once was, and I'm not in a position [1] to double check right now. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] Be quiet in the peanut gallery! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions Ok so a 3rd party tool is needed. 1- Maybe it's easy, but it's not a very efficient method. But thanks, I'll check those sites. 2- OWA would work best when user is away and has no access to his/her computer. Maybe I'm wrong but doesn't turning off the auto-replies disables generating auto-reply and not the Out-of-Office messages and only to the Internet? This would have no effect on internal emails. --Alex -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions 1- Easiest way I can think of is send a message to al users and see which one's send back Out of Office replies. If a tool exists, it's either at www.cdolive.com, www.mail-resources.com [1], or www.slipstick.com. 2- OWA could be used, but it amounts to the same thing as logging into the user's mailbox. You could turn off auto-replies to the internet at your IMS [2] to block all of them. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] No promotional fees were paid to the sender for this blatant plug. [3] [2] Generally accepted as a Good Idea! [3] Hi, Chris! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOA questions EX 55/SP4, NT4/SP6 1- Is there a way/tool to find out which mailboxes are setup with Out of Office message at any given time? 2- Is there a way/tool to modify it (e.g. turn it off), right from the Exchange Administrator and without having to log in to user's mailbox? Can OWA be used to do this? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Name not recognized.
Harvey1 was probably given delegate permissions to harveye's mailbox. Log on to Harveye's mailbox, right click on the calendar and select permissions. See if harvey1 is granted permission there and remove him. Might be worth checking the other containers in the mailbox as well. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Name not recognized. When an appointment is scheduled for a user (harveye), I receive the following error message saying that harvey1 could not be reached. Harvey1 was a second mailbox for the user which has been deleted. If I click on the properties of the harveye mailbox, it is associated with the primary windows NT account of harveye (not harvey1), just like it should be. I can't figure out why scheduling an appointment with Harvey returns an error about trying to reach harvey1. I have ran the Consistency Adjuster several times since deleting the harvey1 mailbox, and even reselected the primary windows NT account of harveye. Anybody had this problem before? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Again Sent: 09/17/2002 12:30 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: harvey1 on 09/17/2002 12:31 PM The recipient name is not recognized _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple updaters for a DL
Go have that baby already, will ya! :) Mike -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL Heck, I'm 9 months pregnant, and, apparently I've lost my mind. I guess Chris is right and I'm wrong. My bad. M - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:39 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL Well, I tried making a DL the owner of another DL. I got a pop-up window telling me, quite explicity, that one DL cannot own another. It then suggested that I select another account. It may have suggested a mailbox, but I can't be sure. I was too busy pounding the desk in triumph. It was bittersweet, though. I really did want it to work. So, how do you make it work, Missy? I'm also interested in how to make a DL the owner of a mailbox. I didn't think that was possible, either. I think I've got the one-to-one thing sorted out, but I'll check that, too. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 5:54 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL It is indeed a migration issue. It's dealt with by going through the 5.5 directory and identifying mailboxes that are owned by DL's and reassigning them to *unique* accounts. (Remember that there is a one-to-one association between AD accounts mailboxes in E2K, so no account can be the primary NT account for 1 mailbox.) Missy - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 1:53 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL You're killing me, Missy. So, obviously it wasn't Missy who said that a DL couldn't own another. My brilliant facility with logic enables me to deduce that it must've been someone else. Either that, or I've imagined the whole thing. So, first thing in the morning, I'm gonna have another whack at it. On a related note, Missy's second statement about E2K has me somewhat concerned (only somewhat, because I'm the calm, cool, collected type). This leads me to two questions: Isn't this a migration issue? How have other people dealt with this? - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL In 5.5, a DL can own another DL. In E2K, it cannot. - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:56 PM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL That's what I thought. However, I couldn't make it happen. I seem to remember a post from some expert (you? Chris Scharff? Missy? Daniel? Oh, dear, that's gonna drive me nuts) saying that a DL couldn't be the owner of another DL. Hoping that this wasn't true, I tried it again and again. It seems to be true. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:28 AM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL I thought the way to do it was to put the DL in the Owner field for the list. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Murray Alexander Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple updaters for a DL In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives... EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a: I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL. We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the former. Each Exchange mailbox is associated with a PEOPLE domain account. I created a NT Global Group (DLADMINS) that contains the NT accounts associated with the mailboxes of those who need update privileges. Then, in Exchange Administrator, I added that group, with User privileges, to the Permissions page of DLs that needed attention from these people. I know I've seen posts from others asking about this, but can't remember if anyone had a solution. If you did all this months ago and posted your findings, when did you do that? I've been keeping my own archive for about a year, and couldn't find it. If you know how to get to the archives, please give me lots of details off-line. Despite some foot-in-mouth postings earlier, I consider myself
RE: OOA questions
Certainly someone in that hospital of yours can help you get in the right position. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions IIRC, turning off auto-replies to the internet kills both to the internet. You are correct that it would have no effect internally. Then again, my memory isn't what it once was, and I'm not in a position [1] to double check right now. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] Be quiet in the peanut gallery! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions Ok so a 3rd party tool is needed. 1- Maybe it's easy, but it's not a very efficient method. But thanks, I'll check those sites. 2- OWA would work best when user is away and has no access to his/her computer. Maybe I'm wrong but doesn't turning off the auto-replies disables generating auto-reply and not the Out-of-Office messages and only to the Internet? This would have no effect on internal emails. --Alex -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions 1- Easiest way I can think of is send a message to al users and see which one's send back Out of Office replies. If a tool exists, it's either at www.cdolive.com, www.mail-resources.com [1], or www.slipstick.com. 2- OWA could be used, but it amounts to the same thing as logging into the user's mailbox. You could turn off auto-replies to the internet at your IMS [2] to block all of them. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] No promotional fees were paid to the sender for this blatant plug. [3] [2] Generally accepted as a Good Idea! [3] Hi, Chris! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOA questions EX 55/SP4, NT4/SP6 1- Is there a way/tool to find out which mailboxes are setup with Out of Office message at any given time? 2- Is there a way/tool to modify it (e.g. turn it off), right from the Exchange Administrator and without having to log in to user's mailbox? Can OWA be used to do this? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOA questions
You, Mr. David, were included in the peanut gallery! :) Mike -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions Certainly someone in that hospital of yours can help you get in the right position. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions IIRC, turning off auto-replies to the internet kills both to the internet. You are correct that it would have no effect internally. Then again, my memory isn't what it once was, and I'm not in a position [1] to double check right now. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] Be quiet in the peanut gallery! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions Ok so a 3rd party tool is needed. 1- Maybe it's easy, but it's not a very efficient method. But thanks, I'll check those sites. 2- OWA would work best when user is away and has no access to his/her computer. Maybe I'm wrong but doesn't turning off the auto-replies disables generating auto-reply and not the Out-of-Office messages and only to the Internet? This would have no effect on internal emails. --Alex -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions 1- Easiest way I can think of is send a message to al users and see which one's send back Out of Office replies. If a tool exists, it's either at www.cdolive.com, www.mail-resources.com [1], or www.slipstick.com. 2- OWA could be used, but it amounts to the same thing as logging into the user's mailbox. You could turn off auto-replies to the internet at your IMS [2] to block all of them. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] No promotional fees were paid to the sender for this blatant plug. [3] [2] Generally accepted as a Good Idea! [3] Hi, Chris! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOA questions EX 55/SP4, NT4/SP6 1- Is there a way/tool to find out which mailboxes are setup with Out of Office message at any given time? 2- Is there a way/tool to modify it (e.g. turn it off), right from the Exchange Administrator and without having to log in to user's mailbox? Can OWA be used to do this? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: OOA questions
Foiled again. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions You, Mr. David, were included in the peanut gallery! :) Mike -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions Certainly someone in that hospital of yours can help you get in the right position. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions IIRC, turning off auto-replies to the internet kills both to the internet. You are correct that it would have no effect internally. Then again, my memory isn't what it once was, and I'm not in a position [1] to double check right now. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] Be quiet in the peanut gallery! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions Ok so a 3rd party tool is needed. 1- Maybe it's easy, but it's not a very efficient method. But thanks, I'll check those sites. 2- OWA would work best when user is away and has no access to his/her computer. Maybe I'm wrong but doesn't turning off the auto-replies disables generating auto-reply and not the Out-of-Office messages and only to the Internet? This would have no effect on internal emails. --Alex -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOA questions 1- Easiest way I can think of is send a message to al users and see which one's send back Out of Office replies. If a tool exists, it's either at www.cdolive.com, www.mail-resources.com [1], or www.slipstick.com. 2- OWA could be used, but it amounts to the same thing as logging into the user's mailbox. You could turn off auto-replies to the internet at your IMS [2] to block all of them. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care [1] No promotional fees were paid to the sender for this blatant plug. [3] [2] Generally accepted as a Good Idea! [3] Hi, Chris! -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOA questions EX 55/SP4, NT4/SP6 1- Is there a way/tool to find out which mailboxes are setup with Out of Office message at any given time? 2- Is there a way/tool to modify it (e.g. turn it off), right from the Exchange Administrator and without having to log in to user's mailbox? Can OWA be used to do this? Thanks --Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
BadMailFrom
Need some help interpreting this MSEXCH:IMS:Fiji Government:Suva:EXCHANGE01 3553 (000B09AA) 553 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (#5.7.1) Have scowered thru TechNet and is does not provide any explanation, appreciate the help Ravisa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BadMailFrom
Sounds like the recipient doesnt want you relaying off of or sending mail to them based upon their badmailfrom list. -Original Message- From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BadMailFrom Need some help interpreting this MSEXCH:IMS:Fiji Government:Suva:EXCHANGE01 3553 (000B09AA) 553 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (#5.7.1) Have scowered thru TechNet and is does not provide any explanation, appreciate the help Ravisa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BadMailFrom
They're saying you fit their definition of someone that they don't want to talk to. QMAIL uses a badmailfrom file, add a domain to that and they won't spam you any more. Many domains now have taken to blocking all Asian top-level domains, since it's proven impossible to get (a large portion of) them to close down their open relays. badmailfrom Unacceptable envelope sender addresses. qmail-smtpd will reject every recipient address for a message if the envelope sender address is listed in badmailfrom. A line in badmailfrom may be of the form @host, meaning every address at host. -Original Message- From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 03:20 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: BadMailFrom Subject: BadMailFrom Need some help interpreting this MSEXCH:IMS:Fiji Government:Suva:EXCHANGE01 3553 (000B09AA) 553 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (#5.7.1) Have scowered thru TechNet and is does not provide any explanation, appreciate the help Ravisa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Name not recognized.
Well Mr. Morrison, you are indeed correct. He was a delegate, and it did correct the problem. Thanks sir! -Original Message- From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Name not recognized. Harvey1 was probably given delegate permissions to harveye's mailbox. Log on to Harveye's mailbox, right click on the calendar and select permissions. See if harvey1 is granted permission there and remove him. Might be worth checking the other containers in the mailbox as well. Mike Morrison Staff System Engineer Fletcher Allen Health Care -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Name not recognized. When an appointment is scheduled for a user (harveye), I receive the following error message saying that harvey1 could not be reached. Harvey1 was a second mailbox for the user which has been deleted. If I click on the properties of the harveye mailbox, it is associated with the primary windows NT account of harveye (not harvey1), just like it should be. I can't figure out why scheduling an appointment with Harvey returns an error about trying to reach harvey1. I have ran the Consistency Adjuster several times since deleting the harvey1 mailbox, and even reselected the primary windows NT account of harveye. Anybody had this problem before? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Again Sent: 09/17/2002 12:30 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: harvey1 on 09/17/2002 12:31 PM The recipient name is not recognized _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
PerlMX ??? ok for your desktop and small setups I guess, but if you are serious about performance etc. then you need to use Sendmail's in-built (if you build it to use this feature that is) MILTER (if you think of smtp event sinks in Exchange 2000 then its _sort_ of the same thing) and then the MILTER filter has to be written in c . anything else is a poor second. Of course this is all free, but you have to know what you are doing ..and it isnt related to Exchange at all so its off topic! more on topic for this sort of stuff is what you can get at e-nspect.co.uk or com which doesnt use the Exchange server log files to generate reports so it can grab more data about attachments etc. unlike Promodag. mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Migration Problems
All, I'm trying to migrate public folders from my 5.5 server to my E2K server. I'm doing this through the Exchange 5.5 Admin. Removing the home server from the replicas and adding the E2K server so that forces it to make the E2K server the new home server. When I do attemp this by hitting apply I get the error message that pops up: There is no consistency between directories. On the DSA General property page, choose check knowledge consistency. Now I can't find a DSA General page. But I did find on the 5.5 (that houses the public folders) on the advanced tab a Consistency adjuster. Is that what it's referring to? When I hit cancel and re-open the property page for that public folder it tells me that the home server is now the E2k server. But how is that when it's giving me an error when trying to move the public folder to it's new home server? Anyone encounter this problem before? Please help. Thank you, John Bowles _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
I quite agree, you seem to be missing the point that the backup strategy is crap, and it's not due to hard disk transportation issues. I think you have the ammo you were after, now use it! -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 14 September 2002 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Get off that angle. He's not dragging it home from the bumper, he's giving it a ride on a nice upholstered seat in his Lexus. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:20 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Backup Hardware Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Still wouldn't all the vibration and shocks that the HD will suffer from transport eventually lead to corruption or bad sectors? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware And if that is the case, he could be transporting a blank hot spare back and forth. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Must be a RAID1 (2 drives) + one hot spare. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Which is what I was thinking too. But my boss swears that there's 3 drives in there connected to that controller. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Only one drive out of the RAID5? Maybe I did not read that correctly but he only has bits of part of the data. What can he accomplish with that one drive in case of disaster? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: backup failure
Back to the original question ... The account you are using to back up Exchange mailboxes needs to have Mailbox Owner rights to all mailboxes that you wish to back up. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 14 September 2002 6:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure I can vouch for that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure Yep. Or, to be precise, when you see me, you'll be in hell. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leo Ballester Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure I will see you in HELL :-) -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure Well done, Leo. You have single-handedly pissed off at least 17 secret cabals who are now plotting your eventual downfall and ruin. Due to cross-membership in many of these cabals, there will likely as not be correlation of these plots. And when it's all over and done for your mortal life, that's where I'm waiting for you. This is gonna be fun. And I'm not making up the secret cabals bit. Others will deny they exist, but that's because its more fun when our victims are confused as to whether or not we really exist. (:= -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/3/2002 8:14 PM Subject: RE: backup failure I see... The problem is not the backup software. The problem is simple you are a F Ahole and you should kill yourself immediately! Or tell me where you are and I will gladly do it for you. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure Apple System 7.2 and OS/2 with Dingleberry Backup 4.9 Beta 3. -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/3/2002 7:07 PM Subject: RE: backup failure What software are you using? -Original Message- From: paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: backup failure Hi, My backup have failed for the last two days. I read the log and its says unable to attach to \\server\microsoft exchange mailboxes. my exchange is working fine, what could be the problem here. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2000 - Exchange 2000 - VPN problem
My setup: Single box / Win2k Server (PDC), Exchange 2000, ISA and RAS. All my users VPN into this box to connect Outlook 2000 to Exchange. Currently all my users connect fine through VPN. My XP users get server unavailable when they start Outlook. They can press retry and sometimes after pressing it many times, it will actually connect. My Win9x users do not have this problem. They press retry once and it is connected. My Win2k users usually don't have the XP problem, they usually only have the press the retry once. Any Ideas? Guy Swartwood _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Did the sink get regsitered correctly? is it enabled? an easy way to chec this is by using the event sink admin utility found on the e-nspect web site. mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox monitoring
PerlMX ??? ok for your desktop and small setups I guess, but if you are serious about performance etc. then you need to use Sendmail's in-built (if you build it to use this feature that is) MILTER (if you think of smtp event sinks in Exchange 2000 then its _sort_ of the same thing) and then the MILTER filter has to be written in c . anything else is a poor second. Of course this is all free, but you have to know what you are doing ..and it isnt related to Exchange at all so its off topic! more on topic for this sort of stuff is www.e-nspect.co.uk which doesnt use the Exchange server log files to generate reports so it can grab more data about attachments etc. unlike Promodag.. mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any experience with GFI Mail Security?
I am considering moving away from Norton on my Exchange server and am interested in GFI's Mail Security and Mail Essentials tools. Does anyone have any experiences with these products that they would like to share before I plunk down thousands? Jeff Hague Network Manager Randolph-Macon College [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
check it with the event sink administration module from www.e-nspect.co.uk you can register, edit and delete sinks using this MMC snap-in mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sp3 revisited
ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' Yes, they are cumulative. One important note however - if you received a special hotfix on top of a certain service pack (say SP2) close to the time before the next SP was released (SP3), that hotfix isn't guaranteed to be in the next SP (SP3 in this case). You should check with the PSS engineer who gave you the hotfix to verify this. Neigh. :-) - KC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deleting Internet Newsgroups
Hi List, apologies if this has been asked before, but I couldn't find anything in the archive. Here's the problem: A newsfeed was set up in Exchange 2000 with the default configuration, feeding from all newsgroups (*). Exchange d'loaded all group folders and set up the folder structure in the public folders, before I could cancel the process. How can I delete all of them folders at once? In the Exchange administrator console i can only delete them toplevel folder by toplevel folder, and .alt cannot be deleted at all (due to its massive size i suppose). Any help appreciated. TIA Mikko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
check it with the event sink administration module from e-nspect.co.uk you can register, edit, and delete event sinks using this MMC snap-in mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Hardware
See I already knew the backup strategy was crap. Yet my boss thought it was a great idea. So the easiest way to win the argument was to show the failure of the physical device instead of talking strategy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 9:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware I quite agree, you seem to be missing the point that the backup strategy is crap, and it's not due to hard disk transportation issues. I think you have the ammo you were after, now use it! -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 14 September 2002 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Get off that angle. He's not dragging it home from the bumper, he's giving it a ride on a nice upholstered seat in his Lexus. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:20 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Backup Hardware Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Still wouldn't all the vibration and shocks that the HD will suffer from transport eventually lead to corruption or bad sectors? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware And if that is the case, he could be transporting a blank hot spare back and forth. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Must be a RAID1 (2 drives) + one hot spare. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Which is what I was thinking too. But my boss swears that there's 3 drives in there connected to that controller. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Only one drive out of the RAID5? Maybe I did not read that correctly but he only has bits of part of the data. What can he accomplish with that one drive in case of disaster? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: Backup Hardware
You could go in and fail the server and that will prove his/her backup strategy is no good. Brian -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware See I already knew the backup strategy was crap. Yet my boss thought it was a great idea. So the easiest way to win the argument was to show the failure of the physical device instead of talking strategy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 9:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware I quite agree, you seem to be missing the point that the backup strategy is crap, and it's not due to hard disk transportation issues. I think you have the ammo you were after, now use it! -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 14 September 2002 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Get off that angle. He's not dragging it home from the bumper, he's giving it a ride on a nice upholstered seat in his Lexus. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:20 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Backup Hardware Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Still wouldn't all the vibration and shocks that the HD will suffer from transport eventually lead to corruption or bad sectors? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware And if that is the case, he could be transporting a blank hot spare back and forth. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Must be a RAID1 (2 drives) + one hot spare. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Which is what I was thinking too. But my boss swears that there's 3 drives in there connected to that controller. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Hardware Only one drive out of the RAID5? Maybe I did not read that correctly but he only has bits of part of the data. What can he accomplish with that one drive in case of disaster? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Hardware My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night. Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think it's possibly the worst idea ever created. Besides the constant vibrations, and temperature changes that the hard drives would have to withstand could everyone give me some more reasons as to why this is a bad idea. I think I just need a little ammo from other admins to help convince him. Thanks Chris Hummert Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance Webmaster for Noghri.net http://www.noghri.net MS Beta tester ID #: 388366 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. - from Calvin and Hobbes _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Any experience with GFI Mail Security?
I've been using Mail Essentials on a gateway machine for a couple of years and have been pretty happy with it. Between the attachment blocking and virus checking, it does an excellent job of stopping viruses (I'm still using the last version before they split it into two on the gateway). It also reduces the amount of spam that gets through with a little tweaking of the content filter. One thing I don't like is that it sends a copy of every virus it catches to the mailbox of the person designated to process the quarantine. Not exactly safe if you ask me. Since GFI released Mail Security while I was still under maintenance for Mail Essentials, I got to upgrade to it for free. I've been using it on the Exchange Server in VSAPI mode for about 6 months and it also does an excellent job of keeping the server virus free (including quarantining the notice messages from Mail Essentials :-)). I do have a problem with the way it quarantines things though -- when you release an item that was an attachment from quarantine in Mail Security, it just disappears. You have to manually save the attachment and then email it to the intended recipient. I don't know whether this is a VSAPI thing or if Mail Security is not handling it correctly or if I am just doing something wrong. The few times I have contacted GFI for support, they have been fairly quick to respond and their answers have been pretty accurate. Make sure you contact them about educational pricing, they offer some pretty good educational discounts. If you have any specific questions, please feel free to email me directly. Greg Eytcheson Director of Computing Independence Community College [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Any experience with GFI Mail Security? I am considering moving away from Norton on my Exchange server and am interested in GFI's Mail Security and Mail Essentials tools. Does anyone have any experiences with these products that they would like to share before I plunk down thousands? Jeff Hague Network Manager Randolph-Macon College [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 2000 Logon field..
Not for my talented developers. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Logon field.. Is it that complicated? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Logon field.. I know a couple of talented developers who'd likely have time to work on such a project after MEC. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 2000 Logon field.. Hi all, I believe this has been asked before. I searched through the archives but I couldn't find it... Basically I need to have an OWA 5.5 style logon box so users can enter their mailbox alias. I need it because some users have multiple mailboxes associated to them. I know I can use http://[exchange.ip]/exchange/[alias_name], but the users won't remember. Any ideas? Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forward/ Reverse Domain Lookup - Blocking Mail
You don't. However I'm sure there are a number of 3rd party gateway products which can be configured to do this. www.mail-resources.com has a list of potential candidates. That'll block a fair amount of potentially legitimate mail as well. -Original Message- From: Jason Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forward/ Reverse Domain Lookup - Blocking Mail Anyone here know how to configure Exchange to block email that originates from a domain that fails a forward and reverse DNS lookup? Any help would be appreciate. Thanks all. Config: Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 Winnt 4.0 SP6a _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: end of life / support from Microsoft
No such information is currently publicly available. -Original Message- From: Herb, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: end of life / support from Microsoft hi, can someone please point me to information on when microsoft will stop supporting versions of a product (specifically Exchange 5.5)? thanks, mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BadMailFrom
The recipient doesn't want mail from your domain and or IP address for some reason. Possibly you are an open relay or your IP block is suspect or one of your users has really pissed of their mail admin. -Original Message- From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BadMailFrom Need some help interpreting this MSEXCH:IMS:Fiji Government:Suva:EXCHANGE01 3553 (000B09AA) 553 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (#5.7.1) Have scowered thru TechNet and is does not provide any explanation, appreciate the help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 - Exchange 2000 - VPN problem
You have name resolution issues (all of your users have a problem if they have to hit retry). -Original Message- From: Guy Swartwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2000 - Exchange 2000 - VPN problem My setup: Single box / Win2k Server (PDC), Exchange 2000, ISA and RAS. All my users VPN into this box to connect Outlook 2000 to Exchange. Currently all my users connect fine through VPN. My XP users get server unavailable when they start Outlook. They can press retry and sometimes after pressing it many times, it will actually connect. My Win9x users do not have this problem. They press retry once and it is connected. My Win2k users usually don't have the XP problem, they usually only have the press the retry once. Any Ideas? Guy Swartwood _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Eh? What are you replying to? -Original Message- From: mike dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. Did the sink get regsitered correctly? is it enabled? an easy way to chec this is by using the event sink admin utility found on the e-nspect web site. mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Eh? What are you replying to? -Original Message- From: Mike Dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. check it with the event sink administration module from www.e-nspect.co.uk you can register, edit and delete sinks using this MMC snap-in _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Eh? What are you replying to? -Original Message- From: Mike Dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink. check it with the event sink administration module from e-nspect.co.uk you can register, edit, and delete event sinks using this MMC snap-in mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange - Notes dirsync issue
Dear All,
We have an MS Connector for Lotus Notes installed
connecting an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server to a Lotus Notes 4.6
server. Currently we are experiencing problems with the
directory synchronization.
Every night during the Dirsync process the following
messages are logged:
Severity: 1
Date/Time: /mm/dd hh:mm:ss
Process Name: LME-NOTES-DXA
Module Name:Isnabapi
Line number:3098
Track ID:
Message number: 41106
Message:
Error converting *? Err Param 2 ?#8221; to a notes Time/Date
Severity: 1
Date/Time: /mm/dd hh:mm:ss
Process Name: LME-NOTES-DXA
Module Name:dxanotes
Line number:1864
Track ID:
Message number: 64138
Message:
Error {Not available} detected when looking for changes in
NAMES.NSF on SERVERNAME
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Many thanks in advance,
Olivier
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
