RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.....

2003-03-17 Thread Roger Seielstad
I find as a group (and this is a gross generalization), Windows sysadmins
don't know crap about DNS.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:03 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
 
 
 The same way some of us are NT/W2K Network Administrators 
 without completely understanding DNS. It happens, and then it 
 becomes learn or leave.
 
 Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
 503-675-5510
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 13:56 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
 
 
 I never understood how anyone could be a mail admin without 
 REALLY understanding DNS.  Which I do.
 
 That isn't meant as a dig at you, Roger, or at anyone else.  
 I mean it just as I said it.
 
 And yes - you're correct; if your dns is messed up, neither 
 sendmail or qmail is going work, for sure.
 
DNS and mail
MX and reverse lookup
Screw up?  Mail flow stops.
 
 Have a good weekend everyone.  May your pager and cell phone 
 remain silent.
 
 Jesse Wendel
 Sr. Technical Systems Analyst
 Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator
 www.pse.com
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Emails per day

2003-03-17 Thread Roger Seielstad
This is getting better all the time.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
 And Mr. Scharff your bitch?
 
 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
 Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
 Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Roger Seielstad
 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
 Does that make me Scharff's Pimp?
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Emails per day
  
  
  I will do that.
  
  Mr. Scharff?
  
  Ken Powell
  Systems Administrator
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
  Fax: (360) 759-6001
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM
  To: Exchange 5.5 List
  Subject: RE: Emails per day
  
  
  I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - 
 we're looking 
  at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on.
  
  The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my 
  environment (600 users). It struck me as it might be expensive for 
  larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger deployments.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Emails per day
   
   
   Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just
  got the dog
   and pony yesterday and would be interested in what people thought 
   about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go 
 with it? Why 
   didn't you.
   
   Ken Powell
   Systems Administrator
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
   Fax: (360) 759-6001
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM
   To: Exchange 5.5 List
   Subject: Re: Emails per day
   
   
   Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser
   Quest - MessageStats
   NetIQ- AppAnalyzer
   
   
   - Original Message -
   From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM
   Subject: Emails per day
   
   
   This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to
  find out
   how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could
  check at the
   firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. 
   Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that
  performance hit) and
   we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to 
   assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and 
   externally. Thanks.
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   

RE: Emails per day

2003-03-17 Thread Roger Seielstad
Wow. I just got 4 content filter notifications for this. Of course, PIMP
wasn't the word that triggered it, since I got none from my initial post.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad 
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
 This is getting better all the time.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Emails per day
  
  
  And Mr. Scharff your bitch?
  
  Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
  Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
  Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
  Roger Seielstad
  Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Emails per day
  
  
  Does that make me Scharff's Pimp?
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Emails per day
   
   
   I will do that.
   
   Mr. Scharff?
   
   Ken Powell
   Systems Administrator
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
   Fax: (360) 759-6001
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM
   To: Exchange 5.5 List
   Subject: RE: Emails per day
   
   
   I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install -
  we're looking
   at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on.
   
   The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my
   environment (600 users). It struck me as it might be 
 expensive for 
   larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger deployments.
   
   --
   Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
   Sr. Systems Administrator
   Inovis Inc.
   
   
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Emails per day


Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just
   got the dog
and pony yesterday and would be interested in what 
 people thought
about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go 
  with it? Why
didn't you.

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001

-Original Message-
From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Re: Emails per day


Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser
Quest - MessageStats
NetIQ- AppAnalyzer


- Original Message -
From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM
Subject: Emails per day


This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to
   find out
how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could
   check at the
firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail.
Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that
   performance hit) and
we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a 
 simple way to
assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and 
externally. Thanks.


 _
List posting FAQ:   
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   
 http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 _
List posting FAQ:   
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   
 http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
List posting FAQ:   
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   
 http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 

Re: Emails per day

2003-03-17 Thread Andy David
I always get them from Seielstad

- Original Message - 
From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM
Subject: RE: Emails per day


 Wow. I just got 4 content filter notifications for this. Of course, PIMP
 wasn't the word that triggered it, since I got none from my initial post.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad 
  Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Emails per day
  
  
  This is getting better all the time.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Emails per day
   
   
   And Mr. Scharff your bitch?
   
   Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
   Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
   Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
   Roger Seielstad
   Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Emails per day
   
   
   Does that make me Scharff's Pimp?
   
   --
   Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
   Sr. Systems Administrator
   Inovis Inc.
   
   
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Emails per day


I will do that.

Mr. Scharff?

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Emails per day


I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install -
   we're looking
at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on.

The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my
environment (600 users). It struck me as it might be 
  expensive for 
larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger deployments.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
 Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just
got the dog
 and pony yesterday and would be interested in what 
  people thought
 about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go 
   with it? Why
 didn't you.
 
 Ken Powell
 Systems Administrator
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
 Fax: (360) 759-6001
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM
 To: Exchange 5.5 List
 Subject: Re: Emails per day
 
 
 Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser
 Quest - MessageStats
 NetIQ- AppAnalyzer
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM
 Subject: Emails per day
 
 
 This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to
find out
 how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could
check at the
 firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail.
 Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that
performance hit) and
 we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a 
  simple way to
 assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and 
 externally. Thanks.
 
 
  _
 List posting FAQ:   
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   
  http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  _
 List posting FAQ:   
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   
  http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  _
 List 

RE: Emails per day

2003-03-17 Thread Roger Seielstad
You sure that's not your speeling chucker?

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Emails per day
 
 
 I always get them from Seielstad
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
  Wow. I just got 4 content filter notifications for this. Of course, 
  PIMP wasn't the word that triggered it, since I got none from my 
  initial post.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Roger Seielstad
   Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Emails per day
   
   
   This is getting better all the time.
   
   --
   Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
   Sr. Systems Administrator
   Inovis Inc.
   
   
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Emails per day


And Mr. Scharff your bitch?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger 
Seielstad
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Emails per day


Does that make me Scharff's Pimp?

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
 I will do that.
 
 Mr. Scharff?
 
 Ken Powell
 Systems Administrator
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
 Fax: (360) 759-6001
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM
 To: Exchange 5.5 List
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
 I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install -
we're looking
 at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on.
 
 The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my 
 environment (600 users). It struck me as it might be
   expensive for
 larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger 
 deployments.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Emails per day
  
  
  Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just
 got the dog
  and pony yesterday and would be interested in what
   people thought
  about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go
with it? Why
  didn't you.
  
  Ken Powell
  Systems Administrator
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
  Fax: (360) 759-6001
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM
  To: Exchange 5.5 List
  Subject: Re: Emails per day
  
  
  Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser
  Quest - MessageStats
  NetIQ- AppAnalyzer
  
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM
  Subject: Emails per day
  
  
  This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to
 find out
  how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could
 check at the
  firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound 
  mail. Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that
 performance hit) and
  we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a
   simple way to
  assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and
  externally. Thanks.
  
  
   _
  List posting FAQ:   
   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   
   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To 

PST database?

2003-03-17 Thread Ashraph, Elizabeth A.
Hi,
Does anyone know of a database-based application that is capable of importing PST 
files into a single searchable database,  (Other than Exchange or Lotus Notes), 
preserving all dates and attachments. We have a need to restore and search a lot of 
historical email data already in PST format on an ongoing basis, and looking for an 
inhouse solution.  Thanks.

Liz Ashraph
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


OST Problem

2003-03-17 Thread Orin Rehorst
User's laptop won't sync. Have deleted the OST, ran Office repair, all to no
avail. User has 550 mails in inbox. Only 49 sync.

Any suggestions?

TIA

Regards,
Orin

 9:43:41 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Tom Kornegay'
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Hierarchy
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Favorites
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
 9:43:49  12 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:49 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:49[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:49The client operation failed.
 9:43:49Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:49For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:49
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=80004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
 9:43:54 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:54[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:54The client operation failed.
 9:43:54Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:54For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:54
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=80004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
 9:43:55  1 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) deleted in offline folder
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
 9:44:15  252 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:44:15 Error synchronizing folder
 9:44:15[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:44:15The client operation failed.
 9:44:15Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:44:15For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:44:15
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=80004
 005-501-0-550
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
 9:44:15  3 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Views
 9:44:16 Synchronizing Forms
 9:44:16 Done
 9:44:17 Microsoft Exchange offline address book
 9:44:17 Download successful

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Problem

2003-03-17 Thread Martin Blackstone
How big is his mailbox?
What Exchange AV are you using? 


-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Importance: High

User's laptop won't sync. Have deleted the OST, ran Office repair, all to no
avail. User has 550 mails in inbox. Only 49 sync.

Any suggestions?

TIA

Regards,
Orin

 9:43:41 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Tom Kornegay'
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Hierarchy
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Favorites
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
 9:43:49  12 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:49 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:49[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:49The client operation failed.
 9:43:49Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:49For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:49
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=80004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
 9:43:54 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:54[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:54The client operation failed.
 9:43:54Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:54For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:54
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=80004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
 9:43:55  1 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) deleted in offline folder
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
 9:44:15  252 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:44:15 Error synchronizing folder
 9:44:15[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:44:15The client operation failed.
 9:44:15Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:44:15For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:44:15
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=80004
 005-501-0-550
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
 9:44:15  3 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Views
 9:44:16 Synchronizing Forms
 9:44:16 Done
 9:44:17 Microsoft Exchange offline address book
 9:44:17 Download successful

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: PST database?

2003-03-17 Thread Chris Scharff
Depending on the the underlying need and processes involved, the following
solutions may be of use:

PST Attender
http://www.sherpasoftware.com/PSTOverview.shtml
KVAULT
http://www.kvault.com/

Both offer functionality with regards to the searching of PST files, KVS,
Inc. having the longer track record and more interesting long term solutions
IMO. Those are off the top of my head, you might also look at
www.mail-resources.com in the web links section, but I don't think I have
any other products listed there which fit the bill.

-- 
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne

Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp


On 3/17/03 10:43, Ashraph, Elizabeth A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 Does anyone know of a database-based application that is capable of importing
 PST files into a single searchable database,  (Other than Exchange or Lotus
 Notes), preserving all dates and attachments. We have a need to restore and
 search a lot of historical email data already in PST format on an ongoing
 basis, and looking for an inhouse solution.  Thanks.
 
 Liz Ashraph
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Problem

2003-03-17 Thread Ben Schorr
Not to seem obvious but, have you clicked tbe link they provided and done
all of the things suggested there?


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Importance: High

User's laptop won't sync. Have deleted the OST, ran Office repair, all to no
avail. User has 550 mails in inbox. Only 49 sync.

Any suggestions?

TIA

Regards,
Orin

 9:43:41 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Tom Kornegay'
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Hierarchy
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Favorites
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
 9:43:49  12 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:49 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:49[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:49The client operation failed.
 9:43:49Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:49For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:49
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8
 0004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
 9:43:54 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:54[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:54The client operation failed.
 9:43:54Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:54For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:54
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8
 0004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
 9:43:55  1 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) deleted in offline folder
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
 9:44:15  252 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:44:15 Error synchronizing folder
 9:44:15[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:44:15The client operation failed.
 9:44:15Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:44:15For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:44:15
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8
 0004
 005-501-0-550
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
 9:44:15  3 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Views
 9:44:16 Synchronizing Forms
 9:44:16 Done
 9:44:17 Microsoft Exchange offline address book
 9:44:17 Download successful

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Emails per day

2003-03-17 Thread Ed Crowley
Wonder what's wrong with me?  I only got two Trend content filter
notifications.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Emails per day


Wow. I just got 4 content filter notifications for this. Of course, PIMP
wasn't the word that triggered it, since I got none from my initial
post.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
 This is getting better all the time.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Emails per day
  
  
  And Mr. Scharff your bitch?
  
  Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
  Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
  Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger 
  Seielstad
  Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Emails per day
  
  
  Does that make me Scharff's Pimp?
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Emails per day
   
   
   I will do that.
   
   Mr. Scharff?
   
   Ken Powell
   Systems Administrator
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
   Fax: (360) 759-6001
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM
   To: Exchange 5.5 List
   Subject: RE: Emails per day
   
   
   I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install -
  we're looking
   at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on.
   
   The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my 
   environment (600 users). It struck me as it might be
 expensive for
   larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger deployments.
   
   --
   Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
   Sr. Systems Administrator
   Inovis Inc.
   
   
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Emails per day


Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just
   got the dog
and pony yesterday and would be interested in what
 people thought
about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go
  with it? Why
didn't you.

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001

-Original Message-
From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: Re: Emails per day


Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser
Quest - MessageStats
NetIQ- AppAnalyzer


- Original Message -
From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM
Subject: Emails per day


This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to
   find out
how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could
   check at the
firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail.

Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that
   performance hit) and
we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a
 simple way to
assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and
externally. Thanks.


 _
List posting FAQ:   
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   
 http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 _
List posting FAQ:   
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   
 http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _

RE: Emails per day

2003-03-17 Thread Roger Seielstad
You don't swear as much as I do.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 12:40 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
 Wonder what's wrong with me?  I only got two Trend content 
 filter notifications.
 
 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
 Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
 Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Roger Seielstad
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:35 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
 Wow. I just got 4 content filter notifications for this. Of 
 course, PIMP wasn't the word that triggered it, since I got 
 none from my initial post.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad
  Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Emails per day
  
  
  This is getting better all the time.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Emails per day
   
   
   And Mr. Scharff your bitch?
   
   Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
   Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
   Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
   Seielstad
   Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Emails per day
   
   
   Does that make me Scharff's Pimp?
   
   --
   Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
   Sr. Systems Administrator
   Inovis Inc.
   
   
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Emails per day


I will do that.

Mr. Scharff?

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Emails per day


I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install -
   we're looking
at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on.

The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my
environment (600 users). It struck me as it might be
  expensive for
larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger 
 deployments.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Emails per day
 
 
 Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just
got the dog
 and pony yesterday and would be interested in what
  people thought
 about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go
   with it? Why
 didn't you.
 
 Ken Powell
 Systems Administrator
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
 Fax: (360) 759-6001
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM
 To: Exchange 5.5 List
 Subject: Re: Emails per day
 
 
 Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser
 Quest - MessageStats
 NetIQ- AppAnalyzer
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM
 Subject: Emails per day
 
 
 This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to
find out
 how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could
check at the
 firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get 
 outbound/inbound mail.
 
 Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that
performance hit) and
 we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a
  simple way to
 assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and 
 externally. Thanks.
 
 
  _
 List posting FAQ:   
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   
  

Outlook config/deploy Q

2003-03-17 Thread Lum, David
Guys,

With Outlook 2000 clients, I'd like to use a script to push out the creation
of a new folder - in existing PST's, not new nor Exhange Server ones -  off
the Inbox called Notices. Also push out a rule to send e-mail from a
specific address into this folder, as well as display a notification
message. Is there a way to do this with an admin tool? 

It looks lie MODPROF.EXE (in the ORK) fits the bill, has anyone ever used
it?

Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
503-675-5510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Problem

2003-03-17 Thread Orin Rehorst
Mailbox is 250MB. AV is Norton Enterprise.

Regards,
Orin

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OST Problem


How big is his mailbox?
What Exchange AV are you using? 


-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Importance: High

User's laptop won't sync. Have deleted the OST, ran Office repair, all to no
avail. User has 550 mails in inbox. Only 49 sync.

Any suggestions?

TIA

Regards,
Orin

 9:43:41 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Tom Kornegay'
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Hierarchy
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Favorites
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
 9:43:49  12 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:49 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:49[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:49The client operation failed.
 9:43:49Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:49For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:49
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=80004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
 9:43:54 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:54[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:54The client operation failed.
 9:43:54Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:54For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:54
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=80004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
 9:43:55  1 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) deleted in offline folder
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
 9:44:15  252 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:44:15 Error synchronizing folder
 9:44:15[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:44:15The client operation failed.
 9:44:15Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:44:15For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:44:15
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=80004
 005-501-0-550
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
 9:44:15  3 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Views
 9:44:16 Synchronizing Forms
 9:44:16 Done
 9:44:17 Microsoft Exchange offline address book
 9:44:17 Download successful

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Problem

2003-03-17 Thread Orin Rehorst
Yes, I executed all those steps.

Regards,
Orin

Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone:  (713)670-2443
Fax:  (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html


-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OST Problem


Not to seem obvious but, have you clicked tbe link they provided and done
all of the things suggested there?


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Importance: High

User's laptop won't sync. Have deleted the OST, ran Office repair, all to no
avail. User has 550 mails in inbox. Only 49 sync.

Any suggestions?

TIA

Regards,
Orin

 9:43:41 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Tom Kornegay'
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Hierarchy
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Favorites
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
 9:43:49  12 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:49 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:49[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:49The client operation failed.
 9:43:49Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:49For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:49
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8
 0004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
 9:43:54 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:54[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:54The client operation failed.
 9:43:54Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:54For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:54
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8
 0004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
 9:43:55  1 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) deleted in offline folder
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
 9:44:15  252 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:44:15 Error synchronizing folder
 9:44:15[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:44:15The client operation failed.
 9:44:15Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:44:15For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:44:15
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8
 0004
 005-501-0-550
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
 9:44:15  3 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Views
 9:44:16 Synchronizing Forms
 9:44:16 Done
 9:44:17 Microsoft Exchange offline address book
 9:44:17 Download successful

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Problem

2003-03-17 Thread St. John, Drew
Give this a review:

http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=264731



-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OST Problem


Yes, I executed all those steps.

Regards,
Orin

Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone:  (713)670-2443
Fax:  (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html


-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OST Problem


Not to seem obvious but, have you clicked tbe link they provided and done
all of the things suggested there?


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 6:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Importance: High

User's laptop won't sync. Have deleted the OST, ran Office repair, all to no
avail. User has 550 mails in inbox. Only 49 sync.

Any suggestions?

TIA

Regards,
Orin

 9:43:41 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Tom Kornegay'
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Hierarchy
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Favorites
 9:43:41 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
 9:43:49  12 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:49 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:49[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:49The client operation failed.
 9:43:49Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:49For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:49
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8
 0004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
 9:43:49 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
 9:43:54 Error synchronizing folder
 9:43:54[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:43:54The client operation failed.
 9:43:54Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:43:54For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:43:54
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8
 0004
 005-501-0-550
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
 9:43:55  1 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:43:55  1 item(s) deleted in offline folder
 9:43:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
 9:44:15  252 item(s) added to offline folder
 9:44:15 Error synchronizing folder
 9:44:15[80004005-501-0-550]
 9:44:15The client operation failed.
 9:44:15Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
 9:44:15For more information on this failure, click the URL
 below:
 9:44:15
 http://www.microsoft.com/support/prodredirect/outlook2000_us.asp?err=8
 0004
 005-501-0-550
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
 9:44:15  3 item(s) updated in offline folder
 9:44:15 Synchronizing Views
 9:44:16 Synchronizing Forms
 9:44:16 Done
 9:44:17 Microsoft Exchange offline address book
 9:44:17 Download successful

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi all,

Hopefully someone has run into this issue and can lend me some thoughts:

-

1.) All users of Outlook have mail pst's on a 'MyDocs' share via a GPO
redirection.  Some personnel have 'Autoarchive' selected in their client
- this is an anomaly however.

2.) When a remote employee (laptop user) VPN's into the network they
have to remap their PST connection since it is redirected.

3.) Now, if the user comes into the office and logs onto another system
other than using their laptop their mail is redirected from the Exchange
server.  The redirection downloads their email into an OST file on the
file system, downloading the entire mailbox from the Exchange server.

I am under the impression this happens because the new profile does not
have an OST file created for the user.  With the creation of the OST
file the users email is now off of the server.  Help Desk personnel have
to reimport the email into the server.

-

What changes can be done to _not_ have this happen?

Thanks in advance,

Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.com
Ph#: 925-685-6161
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.....

2003-03-17 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Well they should - mail uses it.

Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.com
Ph#: 925-685-6161
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.


I find as a group (and this is a gross generalization), Windows
sysadmins don't know crap about DNS.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:03 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
 
 
 The same way some of us are NT/W2K Network Administrators
 without completely understanding DNS. It happens, and then it 
 becomes learn or leave.
 
 Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
 503-675-5510
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 13:56 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
 
 
 I never understood how anyone could be a mail admin without
 REALLY understanding DNS.  Which I do.
 
 That isn't meant as a dig at you, Roger, or at anyone else.
 I mean it just as I said it.
 
 And yes - you're correct; if your dns is messed up, neither
 sendmail or qmail is going work, for sure.
 
DNS and mail
MX and reverse lookup
Screw up?  Mail flow stops.
 
 Have a good weekend everyone.  May your pager and cell phone
 remain silent.
 
 Jesse Wendel
 Sr. Technical Systems Analyst
 Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator
 www.pse.com
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Script to update Outlook

2003-03-17 Thread Hatley, Ken
Microsoft said this can't be done via rundll, anyone else have any suggestions?

 -Original Message-
From:   Hatley, Ken  
Sent:   Friday, March 14, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Script to update Outlook

Does anyone know how to automate a change to the Logon Network Security settings from 
None to NT Authentication in Outlook.  I was think that there is a rundll command line 
but can't seem to find it.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Public Folder: Exchange
 3.) Now, if the user comes into the office and logs onto 
 another system other than using their laptop their mail 
 is redirected from the Exchange server.  The redirection
 downloads their email into an OST file on the
 file system, downloading the entire mailbox from the Exchange server.

OST files are specific to a particular MAPI profile.  If a user logs on
to another machine, the OST gets created for that user (if Offlife
folders is enabled.) If roaming profiles are enabled, the user will get
an OST file at every machine he/she logs in to.  *Normally* the OST
files are not part of the roaming profile.


 I am under the impression this happens because the new 
 profile does not have an OST file created for the user.
 With the creation of the OST file the users email is now 
 off of the server.  Help Desk personnel have
 to reimport the email into the server.


The mail SHOULD NOT be removed from the server, only mirrored to the
OST.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Trend Micro 6.1 - OT

2003-03-17 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi all,

We use,- were using Trend Micro, and I moved to Sybari's Antigen 'Trial
version' because the 'real-time' feature of Trend Micro was bringing
down the servers and stopping mail flow.

Has anyone else had this issue and if so were they able to get around it
but still use the 'Real Time' scanning feature.  

Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.com
Ph#: 925-685-6161
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.....

2003-03-17 Thread Roger Seielstad
No kidding. But then again, not all Windows sysadmins are involved with
email

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:48 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
 
 
 Well they should - mail uses it.
 
 Erik L. Vesneski
 Sr. Systems Specialist
 www.pmigroup.com
 Ph#: 925-685-6161
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
 
 
 I find as a group (and this is a gross generalization), 
 Windows sysadmins don't know crap about DNS.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:03 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
  
  
  The same way some of us are NT/W2K Network Administrators without 
  completely understanding DNS. It happens, and then it 
 becomes learn or 
  leave.
  
  Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
  503-675-5510
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 13:56 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
  
  
  I never understood how anyone could be a mail admin without REALLY 
  understanding DNS.  Which I do.
  
  That isn't meant as a dig at you, Roger, or at anyone else.
  I mean it just as I said it.
  
  And yes - you're correct; if your dns is messed up, neither 
 sendmail 
  or qmail is going work, for sure.
  
 DNS and mail
 MX and reverse lookup
 Screw up?  Mail flow stops.
  
  Have a good weekend everyone.  May your pager and cell phone remain 
  silent.
  
  Jesse Wendel
  Sr. Technical Systems Analyst
  Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator
  www.pse.com
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.....

2003-03-17 Thread B. van Ouwerkerk
GRIN
They will find out..
Sooner or later...
Probably when it's to late...
/GRIN


B.

At 10:47 17-03-2003 -0800, you wrote:
Well they should - mail uses it.

Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.com
Ph#: 925-685-6161
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
I find as a group (and this is a gross generalization), Windows
sysadmins don't know crap about DNS.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
 -Original Message-
 From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:03 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.


 The same way some of us are NT/W2K Network Administrators
 without completely understanding DNS. It happens, and then it
 becomes learn or leave.

 Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
 503-675-5510


 -Original Message-
 From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 13:56 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.


 I never understood how anyone could be a mail admin without
 REALLY understanding DNS.  Which I do.

 That isn't meant as a dig at you, Roger, or at anyone else.
 I mean it just as I said it.

 And yes - you're correct; if your dns is messed up, neither
 sendmail or qmail is going work, for sure.

DNS and mail
MX and reverse lookup
Screw up?  Mail flow stops.

 Have a good weekend everyone.  May your pager and cell phone
 remain silent.

 Jesse Wendel
 Sr. Technical Systems Analyst
 Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator
 www.pse.com



 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Outlook config/deploy Q

2003-03-17 Thread Chris Scharff
It's been a few years since I've used modprof, but I don't remember it
having the capacity to create subfolders or rules. It's possible to write a
tool to do those things, but I don't believe modprof is the right tool to do
it. Course it's been a while, so I could be mistaken.

On 3/17/03 12:28, Lum, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Guys,
 
 With Outlook 2000 clients, I'd like to use a script to push out the creation
 of a new folder - in existing PST's, not new nor Exhange Server ones -  off
 the Inbox called Notices. Also push out a rule to send e-mail from a
 specific address into this folder, as well as display a notification
 message. Is there a way to do this with an admin tool?
 
 It looks lie MODPROF.EXE (in the ORK) fits the bill, has anyone ever used
 it?
 
 Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
 503-675-5510


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Chris Scharff
OST files don't remove mail from the server. Care to clarify?

On 3/17/03 12:42, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 Hopefully someone has run into this issue and can lend me some thoughts:
 
 -
 
 1.) All users of Outlook have mail pst's on a 'MyDocs' share via a GPO
 redirection.  Some personnel have 'Autoarchive' selected in their client
 - this is an anomaly however.
 
 2.) When a remote employee (laptop user) VPN's into the network they
 have to remap their PST connection since it is redirected.
 
 3.) Now, if the user comes into the office and logs onto another system
 other than using their laptop their mail is redirected from the Exchange
 server.  The redirection downloads their email into an OST file on the
 file system, downloading the entire mailbox from the Exchange server.
 
 I am under the impression this happens because the new profile does not
 have an OST file created for the user.  With the creation of the OST
 file the users email is now off of the server.  Help Desk personnel have
 to reimport the email into the server.
 
 -
 
 What changes can be done to _not_ have this happen?
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Erik L. Vesneski
 Sr. Systems Specialist
 www.pmigroup.com
 Ph#: 925-685-6161
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Trend Micro 6.1 - OT

2003-03-17 Thread Clemens, Rick
Were you using Exchange 2000 or 5.5?  We had problems with Exchange 2000 if
you set the Active Message Filter for both Inbound and Outbound it would
shut-down all the Web Services including SMTP, POP, and WEB.Not Good.
We are working with Trend right now to get it fixedThe temp solution is
to not check the Active Message Filter. 
 
-Original Message-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Hi all,

We use,- were using Trend Micro, and I moved to Sybari's Antigen 'Trial
version' because the 'real-time' feature of Trend Micro was bringing down
the servers and stopping mail flow.

Has anyone else had this issue and if so were they able to get around it but
still use the 'Real Time' scanning feature.  

Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.com
Ph#: 925-685-6161
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


user is working at home on ISDN, slow opening attachments

2003-03-17 Thread richard . lanci
exchange 5.5 sp4 environment. 
user is on an windows XP/office XP pc. 

when the user is in the office, everthing is fine. when the user 
works at home, it will take up to 15 minutes to open a 1meg 
attachment. opening e-mails with no attachments takes up to a minute.
the circuit is a isdn line, 128k. 

Is this normal?? How can I make this better??

thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: user is working at home on ISDN, slow opening attachments

2003-03-17 Thread bscott
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, at 1:13pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 when the user is in the office, everthing is fine. when the user works at
 home, it will take up to 15 minutes to open a 1meg attachment. opening
 e-mails with no attachments takes up to a minute. the circuit is a isdn
 line, 128k.

  A common cause of such problems is broken name resolution.  What kind of
connection is running over the ISDN line?  Direct dial-in to your network?  
VPN?  Something else?

-- 
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do  |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: user is working at home on ISDN, slow opening attachments

2003-03-17 Thread Martin Blackstone
Yes it is normal over a line of that speed.
Best solution would be to setup the user with Offline Folders (OST) file. 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

exchange 5.5 sp4 environment. 
user is on an windows XP/office XP pc. 

when the user is in the office, everthing is fine. when the user 
works at home, it will take up to 15 minutes to open a 1meg 
attachment. opening e-mails with no attachments takes up to a minute.
the circuit is a isdn line, 128k. 

Is this normal?? How can I make this better??

thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: user is working at home on ISDN, slow opening attachments

2003-03-17 Thread Chris Scharff
The user = a user or all users?

On 3/17/03 15:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 exchange 5.5 sp4 environment.
 user is on an windows XP/office XP pc.
 
 when the user is in the office, everthing is fine. when the user
 works at home, it will take up to 15 minutes to open a 1meg
 attachment. opening e-mails with no attachments takes up to a minute.
 the circuit is a isdn line, 128k.
 
 Is this normal?? How can I make this better??
 
 thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


High memory and CPU utilization

2003-03-17 Thread Michael Ahlfont
Does anyone ever run into this problem. On our OWA Server, our CPU utilization maxes 
out at 100%, I check the Processes and it looks like Store.exe is taking about 50K of 
memory utilization. Any idea? It takes about 5 minutes for me to open the task manager.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: High memory and CPU utilization

2003-03-17 Thread Chris Scharff
Exchange version and SP? OS version and SP? Number of concurrent users? CPU
Speed? Installed RAM? That's really 50k allocated to the store?

On 3/17/03 16:05, Michael Ahlfont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does anyone ever run into this problem. On our OWA Server, our CPU utilization
 maxes out at 100%, I check the Processes and it looks like Store.exe is taking
 about 50K of memory utilization. Any idea? It takes about 5 minutes for me to
 open the task manager.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: High memory and CPU utilization

2003-03-17 Thread Michael Ahlfont
Exchange 2000 with sp3 windows 2000 with service pack 2, concurrent users are less 
than 0 right now. The server is a pIII 350 or 450 with 384 of memory. 

50,000k allocated to the store.exe

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: High memory and CPU utilization


Exchange version and SP? OS version and SP? Number of concurrent users? CPU
Speed? Installed RAM? That's really 50k allocated to the store?

On 3/17/03 16:05, Michael Ahlfont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does anyone ever run into this problem. On our OWA Server, our CPU utilization
 maxes out at 100%, I check the Processes and it looks like Store.exe is taking
 about 50K of memory utilization. Any idea? It takes about 5 minutes for me to
 open the task manager.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


WebDAV Exploit

2003-03-17 Thread Edwards, Aaron
Hi,

Does anyone know if this reg hack in Q241520 requires a reboot? The article doesn't 
really say.

Thanks,

Aaron

__

This message and any attachments have been scanned
for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank.
__

NOTICE:  This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged
material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced
recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution,
or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received
this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the
copy you received. Thank you.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: WebDAV Exploit

2003-03-17 Thread William Lefkovics
Yes it does.

William

- Original Message - 
From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:44 PM
Subject: WebDAV Exploit


Hi,

Does anyone know if this reg hack in Q241520 requires a reboot? The article
doesn't really say.

Thanks,

Aaron

__

This message and any attachments have been scanned
for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank.
__

NOTICE:  This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged
material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced
recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution,
or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received
this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the
copy you received. Thank you.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.....

2003-03-17 Thread Ed Crowley
Hell, many Exchange administrators aren't involved with e-mail judging
from the SMTP and DNS questions I see!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.


No kidding. But then again, not all Windows sysadmins are involved with
email

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:48 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
 
 
 Well they should - mail uses it.
 
 Erik L. Vesneski
 Sr. Systems Specialist
 www.pmigroup.com
 Ph#: 925-685-6161
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
 
 
 I find as a group (and this is a gross generalization),
 Windows sysadmins don't know crap about DNS.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:03 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
  
  
  The same way some of us are NT/W2K Network Administrators without
  completely understanding DNS. It happens, and then it 
 becomes learn or
  leave.
  
  Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
  503-675-5510
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 13:56 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.
  
  
  I never understood how anyone could be a mail admin without REALLY
  understanding DNS.  Which I do.
  
  That isn't meant as a dig at you, Roger, or at anyone else. I mean 
  it just as I said it.
  
  And yes - you're correct; if your dns is messed up, neither
 sendmail
  or qmail is going work, for sure.
  
 DNS and mail
 MX and reverse lookup
 Screw up?  Mail flow stops.
  
  Have a good weekend everyone.  May your pager and cell phone remain
  silent.
  
  Jesse Wendel
  Sr. Technical Systems Analyst
  Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator
  www.pse.com
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: WebDAV Exploit

2003-03-17 Thread Edwards, Aaron
I guess I should have worded that better. A reboot of the entire server or just the 
IIS services?
Aaron

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: WebDAV Exploit


Yes it does.

William

- Original Message -
From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:44 PM
Subject: WebDAV Exploit


Hi,

Does anyone know if this reg hack in Q241520 requires a reboot? The article
doesn't really say.

Thanks,

Aaron

__

This message and any attachments have been scanned
for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank.
__

NOTICE:  This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged
material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced
recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution,
or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received
this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the
copy you received. Thank you.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

This message and any attachments have been scanned
for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank.
__

NOTICE:  This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged
material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced
recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution,
or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received
this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the
copy you received. Thank you.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Ed Crowley
Leave all mail on the server.  Don't configure mailbox synchronization
for users at infrequently used workstations.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L.
Vesneski
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OST Issue


Hi all,

Hopefully someone has run into this issue and can lend me some thoughts:

-

1.) All users of Outlook have mail pst's on a 'MyDocs' share via a GPO
redirection.  Some personnel have 'Autoarchive' selected in their client
- this is an anomaly however.

2.) When a remote employee (laptop user) VPN's into the network they
have to remap their PST connection since it is redirected.

3.) Now, if the user comes into the office and logs onto another system
other than using their laptop their mail is redirected from the Exchange
server.  The redirection downloads their email into an OST file on the
file system, downloading the entire mailbox from the Exchange server.

I am under the impression this happens because the new profile does not
have an OST file created for the user.  With the creation of the OST
file the users email is now off of the server.  Help Desk personnel have
to reimport the email into the server.

-

What changes can be done to _not_ have this happen?

Thanks in advance,

Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.com
Ph#: 925-685-6161
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: user is working at home on ISDN, slow opening attachments

2003-03-17 Thread Ed Crowley
Get a faster connection.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: user is working at home on ISDN, slow opening attachments


exchange 5.5 sp4 environment. 
user is on an windows XP/office XP pc. 

when the user is in the office, everthing is fine. when the user 
works at home, it will take up to 15 minutes to open a 1meg 
attachment. opening e-mails with no attachments takes up to a minute.
the circuit is a isdn line, 128k. 

Is this normal?? How can I make this better??

thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: WebDAV Exploit

2003-03-17 Thread William Lefkovics
Good point.  I rebooted, but it is quite likely an IIS restart would
suffice.  Sorry, I have nothing firmer.

- Original Message - 
From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: WebDAV Exploit


I guess I should have worded that better. A reboot of the entire server or
just the IIS services?
Aaron

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: WebDAV Exploit


Yes it does.

William

- Original Message - 
From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:44 PM
Subject: WebDAV Exploit


Hi,

Does anyone know if this reg hack in Q241520 requires a reboot? The article
doesn't really say.

Thanks,

Aaron

__


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi all,

Actually, it is happening.  People log on at another system, not using
roaming profiles, and all their email goes away from the server.  They
go back to their 'normal' laptop or workstation and there is nothing in
the email client.

With that said, being new here, I am researching why this is happening.
The user, when logging on, gets a message about creating an OST or a PST
file.  They usually click 'OK' or 'Yes'

After that, the user gets their email dumped locally on the host they
are logged onto.  Is this due to POP?  I have never seen this before...

Thanks,

Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.com
Ph#: 925-685-6161
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OST Issue


OST files don't remove mail from the server. Care to clarify?

On 3/17/03 12:42, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 Hopefully someone has run into this issue and can lend me some 
 thoughts:
 
 -
 
 1.) All users of Outlook have mail pst's on a 'MyDocs' share via a GPO

 redirection.  Some personnel have 'Autoarchive' selected in their 
 client
 - this is an anomaly however.
 
 2.) When a remote employee (laptop user) VPN's into the network they 
 have to remap their PST connection since it is redirected.
 
 3.) Now, if the user comes into the office and logs onto another 
 system other than using their laptop their mail is redirected from the

 Exchange server.  The redirection downloads their email into an OST 
 file on the file system, downloading the entire mailbox from the 
 Exchange server.
 
 I am under the impression this happens because the new profile does 
 not have an OST file created for the user.  With the creation of the 
 OST file the users email is now off of the server.  Help Desk 
 personnel have to reimport the email into the server.
 
 -
 
 What changes can be done to _not_ have this happen?
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Erik L. Vesneski
 Sr. Systems Specialist
 www.pmigroup.com
 Ph#: 925-685-6161
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: WebDAV Exploit

2003-03-17 Thread Andy David
Viagra can help with that.


-- Original Message --
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Mon, 17 Mar 2003 16:40:10 -0800

Good point.  I rebooted, but it is quite likely an IIS restart would
suffice.  Sorry, I have nothing firmer.

- Original Message - 
From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: WebDAV Exploit


I guess I should have worded that better. A reboot of the entire server or
just the IIS services?
Aaron

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: WebDAV Exploit


Yes it does.

William

- Original Message - 
From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:44 PM
Subject: WebDAV Exploit


Hi,

Does anyone know if this reg hack in Q241520 requires a reboot? The article
doesn't really say.

Thanks,

Aaron

__


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: WebDAV Exploit

2003-03-17 Thread William Lefkovics
Your experience speaks volumes.

- Original Message - 
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: WebDAV Exploit


 Viagra can help with that.
 
 
 -- Original Message --
 From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Mon, 17 Mar 2003 16:40:10 -0800
 
 Good point.  I rebooted, but it is quite likely an IIS restart would
 suffice.  Sorry, I have nothing firmer.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:30 PM
 Subject: RE: WebDAV Exploit
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Ed Crowley
It could be a misconfigured POP profile, or it could be MAPI which is
misconfigured to deliver mail to personal folders instead of the
mailbox.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L.
Vesneski
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OST Issue


Hi all,

Actually, it is happening.  People log on at another system, not using
roaming profiles, and all their email goes away from the server.  They
go back to their 'normal' laptop or workstation and there is nothing in
the email client.

With that said, being new here, I am researching why this is happening.
The user, when logging on, gets a message about creating an OST or a PST
file.  They usually click 'OK' or 'Yes'

After that, the user gets their email dumped locally on the host they
are logged onto.  Is this due to POP?  I have never seen this before...

Thanks,

Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.com
Ph#: 925-685-6161
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OST Issue


OST files don't remove mail from the server. Care to clarify?

On 3/17/03 12:42, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 Hopefully someone has run into this issue and can lend me some
 thoughts:
 
 -
 
 1.) All users of Outlook have mail pst's on a 'MyDocs' share via a GPO

 redirection.  Some personnel have 'Autoarchive' selected in their
 client
 - this is an anomaly however.
 
 2.) When a remote employee (laptop user) VPN's into the network they
 have to remap their PST connection since it is redirected.
 
 3.) Now, if the user comes into the office and logs onto another
 system other than using their laptop their mail is redirected from the

 Exchange server.  The redirection downloads their email into an OST
 file on the file system, downloading the entire mailbox from the 
 Exchange server.
 
 I am under the impression this happens because the new profile does
 not have an OST file created for the user.  With the creation of the 
 OST file the users email is now off of the server.  Help Desk 
 personnel have to reimport the email into the server.
 
 -
 
 What changes can be done to _not_ have this happen?
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Erik L. Vesneski
 Sr. Systems Specialist
 www.pmigroup.com
 Ph#: 925-685-6161
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Ed Crowley
Oh, and Chris is right.  It is not connected at all to offline
synchronization unless the user deletes everything while offline, but
that would still be a user action.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L.
Vesneski
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OST Issue


Hi all,

Actually, it is happening.  People log on at another system, not using
roaming profiles, and all their email goes away from the server.  They
go back to their 'normal' laptop or workstation and there is nothing in
the email client.

With that said, being new here, I am researching why this is happening.
The user, when logging on, gets a message about creating an OST or a PST
file.  They usually click 'OK' or 'Yes'

After that, the user gets their email dumped locally on the host they
are logged onto.  Is this due to POP?  I have never seen this before...

Thanks,

Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
www.pmigroup.com
Ph#: 925-685-6161
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OST Issue


OST files don't remove mail from the server. Care to clarify?

On 3/17/03 12:42, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 Hopefully someone has run into this issue and can lend me some
 thoughts:
 
 -
 
 1.) All users of Outlook have mail pst's on a 'MyDocs' share via a GPO

 redirection.  Some personnel have 'Autoarchive' selected in their
 client
 - this is an anomaly however.
 
 2.) When a remote employee (laptop user) VPN's into the network they
 have to remap their PST connection since it is redirected.
 
 3.) Now, if the user comes into the office and logs onto another
 system other than using their laptop their mail is redirected from the

 Exchange server.  The redirection downloads their email into an OST
 file on the file system, downloading the entire mailbox from the 
 Exchange server.
 
 I am under the impression this happens because the new profile does
 not have an OST file created for the user.  With the creation of the 
 OST file the users email is now off of the server.  Help Desk 
 personnel have to reimport the email into the server.
 
 -
 
 What changes can be done to _not_ have this happen?
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Erik L. Vesneski
 Sr. Systems Specialist
 www.pmigroup.com
 Ph#: 925-685-6161
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Ben Schorr
The user probably has their profile configured to deliver their messages in
a Personal Folder File (.PST) instead of their server mailbox.  Check that
other workstation and you'll probably find a .PST file with their messages
on it.

.OST files do not remove messages from the server.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 2:41 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Hi all,
 
 Actually, it is happening.  People log on at another system, 
 not using roaming profiles, and all their email goes away 
 from the server.  They go back to their 'normal' laptop or 
 workstation and there is nothing in the email client.
 
 With that said, being new here, I am researching why this is 
 happening.
 The user, when logging on, gets a message about creating an 
 OST or a PST file.  They usually click 'OK' or 'Yes'
 
 After that, the user gets their email dumped locally on the 
 host they are logged onto.  Is this due to POP?  I have never 
 seen this before...
 
 Thanks,
 
 Erik L. Vesneski
 Sr. Systems Specialist
 www.pmigroup.com
 Ph#: 925-685-6161
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: OST Issue
 
 
 OST files don't remove mail from the server. Care to clarify?
 
 On 3/17/03 12:42, Erik L. Vesneski 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi all,
  
  Hopefully someone has run into this issue and can lend me some 
  thoughts:
  
  -
  
  1.) All users of Outlook have mail pst's on a 'MyDocs' 
 share via a GPO
 
  redirection.  Some personnel have 'Autoarchive' selected in their 
  client
  - this is an anomaly however.
  
  2.) When a remote employee (laptop user) VPN's into the 
 network they 
  have to remap their PST connection since it is redirected.
  
  3.) Now, if the user comes into the office and logs onto another 
  system other than using their laptop their mail is 
 redirected from the
 
  Exchange server.  The redirection downloads their email into an OST 
  file on the file system, downloading the entire mailbox from the 
  Exchange server.
  
  I am under the impression this happens because the new profile does 
  not have an OST file created for the user.  With the 
 creation of the 
  OST file the users email is now off of the server.  Help Desk 
  personnel have to reimport the email into the server.
  
  -
  
  What changes can be done to _not_ have this happen?
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  Erik L. Vesneski
  Sr. Systems Specialist
  www.pmigroup.com
  Ph#: 925-685-6161
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Chris Scharff
Don't doubt something is happening, but there is insufficient data to
address the issue. OST files, don't download mail and the exact message the
user is getting would probably help a bit. What kind of profile creation
process do you use?

On 3/17/03 18:40, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 Actually, it is happening.  People log on at another system, not using
 roaming profiles, and all their email goes away from the server.  They
 go back to their 'normal' laptop or workstation and there is nothing in
 the email client.
 
 With that said, being new here, I am researching why this is happening.
 The user, when logging on, gets a message about creating an OST or a PST
 file.  They usually click 'OK' or 'Yes'
 
 After that, the user gets their email dumped locally on the host they
 are logged onto.  Is this due to POP?  I have never seen this before...
 
 Thanks,
 
 Erik L. Vesneski
 Sr. Systems Specialist
 www.pmigroup.com
 Ph#: 925-685-6161
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: OST Issue
 
 
 OST files don't remove mail from the server. Care to clarify?
 
 On 3/17/03 12:42, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 Hopefully someone has run into this issue and can lend me some
 thoughts:
 
 -
 
 1.) All users of Outlook have mail pst's on a 'MyDocs' share via a GPO
 
 redirection.  Some personnel have 'Autoarchive' selected in their
 client
 - this is an anomaly however.
 
 2.) When a remote employee (laptop user) VPN's into the network they
 have to remap their PST connection since it is redirected.
 
 3.) Now, if the user comes into the office and logs onto another
 system other than using their laptop their mail is redirected from the
 
 Exchange server.  The redirection downloads their email into an OST
 file on the file system, downloading the entire mailbox from the
 Exchange server.
 
 I am under the impression this happens because the new profile does
 not have an OST file created for the user.  With the creation of the
 OST file the users email is now off of the server.  Help Desk
 personnel have to reimport the email into the server.
 
 -
 
 What changes can be done to _not_ have this happen?
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Erik L. Vesneski
 Sr. Systems Specialist
 www.pmigroup.com
 Ph#: 925-685-6161
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]