RE: Multiple domains.
Absolute madness last night. I was making the new policys which include the legacy domain names, some how EVERY single email address for EVERY single recipient in the whole organisation had there email address wiped, all that remained was the X400 addresses. What gives? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple domains.
Because you made a policy that actually applied to EVERY single recipient that told it to do that. Any new policy you make will be assigned a higher priority than your default policy, and will overwrite it for the recipients that the query that it's based upon (General screen, Modify, Find Now) applies to. Make one recipient policy. Add all the proper addresses. Apply it to nobody. And check (general modify find now) that it applies to nobody. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:37 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Multiple domains. Subject: RE: Multiple domains. Absolute madness last night. I was making the new policys which include the legacy domain names, some how EVERY single email address for EVERY single recipient in the whole organisation had there email address wiped, all that remained was the X400 addresses. What gives? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event ID 474
Exchange server 2000 SP3 These errors are popping up intermittently. The first came back in November, then none until April, now, nearly one a day. According to Q327334 I have a failing hard drive. This is on a RAID 5 system. Is there a chance it could be the RAID controller instead? Has anyone experienced this, and what was your approach in getting it resolved? Thanks, Russ Hansen MCSE+I, MCSE(2k), CCNA, NCP [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
slow login with mac clients after restore.
last night we did a restore because we've been getting some database errors in the event log. we restored from a good backup and played in the log files as normal - everything worked great and we're up and running again, except now our mac users with outlook 2001 take about 5 minutes to log in. they enter credentials at startup and outlook 2001 just hangs for 5 minutes and then starts and works perfectly. we are going to restart the server at lunch to see if this fixes it but i'm not hopeful. any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: slow login with mac clients after restore.
Some questions first. 1) Are we dealing with Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000? What service pack level are you running? 2) How are the Macs connected to the network? 3) What rev of the MAC OS are they running? 4) Do the Macs have a HOSTS file and if so is it setup correctly? 5) For the restore server did you change anything? More importantly, did you restore to the same hardware or to a completely new server? I'm assuming same hardware at this point. 6) Since the Macs can talk to the server what are the ping times like? (You can use MacPing to determine this if you run anything earlier than Mac OSX. If you are running MacOSX then bring up a terminal window and run it from there.). This will do for a start. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Atkinson, Daniel Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 06:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: slow login with mac clients after restore. last night we did a restore because we've been getting some database errors in the event log. we restored from a good backup and played in the log files as normal - everything worked great and we're up and running again, except now our mac users with outlook 2001 take about 5 minutes to log in. they enter credentials at startup and outlook 2001 just hangs for 5 minutes and then starts and works perfectly. we are going to restart the server at lunch to see if this fixes it but i'm not hopeful. any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Double names in Outlook 2002
I have been bothered a bit by the way the names are sorted in the GAL, so I came across this article (http://msexchange.org/tutorials/MF023.html) that showed me how to set up Exchange to sort by last name. Very simple to do and worked like a charm, but... now I am noticing that many times when I type the first few letter of someone's name it often puts the name in the To: field twice and I think the person gets two messages (have yet to verify that). Anyway, has anyone done this procedure on an Exchange 2000/Outlook 2002 configuration and seen the same results? If so, how did you fix it? Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trouble posting on the list
Hello..I am having problems posting on the list through OL..here is the error: Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com discussion lists. The only acceptable format for posting to exchange is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on exchange. I am running outlook 2002 and have the message format to plain text...what am I missing? This message is posted from the web interface. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: trouble posting on the list
The answer to your question is in your message. -Original Message- From: Stevensmd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: trouble posting on the list Hello..I am having problems posting on the list through OL..here is the error: Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com discussion lists. The only acceptable format for posting to exchange is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on exchange. I am running outlook 2002 and have the message format to plain text...what am I missing? This message is posted from the web interface. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple domains.
Okay, let me get this straight I think there is a problem with terminology between us, mostly on my behalf because I'm a little bit thick, but bear with me as I think I have it slightly sussed. Policy applies to = Filter Rules. i.e. in my default policy I have (mailnickname=*). Therefore what lies beneath that policy applies to everyone with a nickname that matches the criteria *, therefore everybody. So the email addresses in this policy is @interserveis.co.uk because our domain is interserveis.co.uk. As the filter rules match everyone the policy should be applied to everyone, therefore receiving an interserveis.co.uk email address. Now, the second policy that I have made, the filter rules for this are Blank, so I'm guessing that there is no match and the policy applies to nobody? Under this policy I have created the legacy domain names @kwikform.co.uk and @ukconstruction.co.uk. This is all working as I wanted it too now, when I create a new user they only receive a @interserveis.co.uk email addy and all kwikform/ukconstruction email addys we create are routing fine and none existent emails are being bounced. However, this still doesn't explain to me why every single email address from my entire organisation was deleted, I'm also scared to change anything again in case it resets them again. To get them back I simply changed the @interserveis.co.uk policy to @interserveis1.co.uk, set it back again and when it asked to update I said yes. That method has not allowed for all the none standard email addresses we had nore any of the kwikform ones that were setup. Perhaps you can comment on my methods and ensure that I am doing correctly? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 June 2003 12:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple domains. Because you made a policy that actually applied to EVERY single recipient that told it to do that. Any new policy you make will be assigned a higher priority than your default policy, and will overwrite it for the recipients that the query that it's based upon (General screen, Modify, Find Now) applies to. Make one recipient policy. Add all the proper addresses. Apply it to nobody. And check (general modify find now) that it applies to nobody. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:37 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Multiple domains. Subject: RE: Multiple domains. Absolute madness last night. I was making the new policys which include the legacy domain names, some how EVERY single email address for EVERY single recipient in the whole organisation had there email address wiped, all that remained was the X400 addresses. What gives? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: slow login with mac clients after restore.
It's ok, the restart fixed it, some gremlin or other... Thanks anyway. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 June 2003 12:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: slow login with mac clients after restore. Some questions first. 1) Are we dealing with Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000? What service pack level are you running? 2) How are the Macs connected to the network? 3) What rev of the MAC OS are they running? 4) Do the Macs have a HOSTS file and if so is it setup correctly? 5) For the restore server did you change anything? More importantly, did you restore to the same hardware or to a completely new server? I'm assuming same hardware at this point. 6) Since the Macs can talk to the server what are the ping times like? (You can use MacPing to determine this if you run anything earlier than Mac OSX. If you are running MacOSX then bring up a terminal window and run it from there.). This will do for a start. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Atkinson, Daniel Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 06:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:slow login with mac clients after restore. last night we did a restore because we've been getting some database errors in the event log. we restored from a good backup and played in the log files as normal - everything worked great and we're up and running again, except now our mac users with outlook 2001 take about 5 minutes to log in. they enter credentials at startup and outlook 2001 just hangs for 5 minutes and then starts and works perfectly. we are going to restart the server at lunch to see if this fixes it but i'm not hopeful. any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: trouble posting on the list
I have the same problem. It may have something to do with the fact that my company allows OOF's. Don't remember the full explanation, I just know that I have to go to the web to participate... Nikki -Original Message- From: Stevensmd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: trouble posting on the list Hello..I am having problems posting on the list through OL..here is the error: Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com discussion lists. The only acceptable format for posting to exchange is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on exchange. I am running outlook 2002 and have the message format to plain text...what am I missing? This message is posted from the web interface. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating a restricted e-mail box
If you set up a public folder to allow anonymous access and set the default permission to Author it should work. Sandhya Pai Manager of Server and Network Services School of Business University of Connecticut -Original Message- From: Reyes Balderas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Creating a restricted e-mail box We have a requirement to create an anonomous e-mail box that will: 1) Use Microsoft exchange 5.5 2) Allow any user to use the mailbox so that the e-mail remains anonomous. 3) Restrict delivery to a specific mailbox or distribution group only so that the mailbox is not used to spam others. 4) Hide sent items so they are not viewable by others. How can the mailbox be set up? Is there an alternative that would satisfy the requirements? Currently, the mailbox has been setup with an alternate recipient, delivery restrictions to only accept messages from itself, and a generic username and password for authentication. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple domains.
How about making it real easy: Add all the SMTP addresses to your default policy, leave the check in the checkbox doodad that says this server's responsible for this address space, and take the check out of the little checkbox doodad that applies it. Delete any additional policy. Done. -tom -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple domains. Okay, let me get this straight I think there is a problem with terminology between us, mostly on my behalf because I'm a little bit thick, but bear with me as I think I have it slightly sussed. Policy applies to = Filter Rules. i.e. in my default policy I have (mailnickname=*). Therefore what lies beneath that policy applies to everyone with a nickname that matches the criteria *, therefore everybody. So the email addresses in this policy is @interserveis.co.uk because our domain is interserveis.co.uk. As the filter rules match everyone the policy should be applied to everyone, therefore receiving an interserveis.co.uk email address. Now, the second policy that I have made, the filter rules for this are Blank, so I'm guessing that there is no match and the policy applies to nobody? Under this policy I have created the legacy domain names @kwikform.co.uk and @ukconstruction.co.uk. This is all working as I wanted it too now, when I create a new user they only receive a @interserveis.co.uk email addy and all kwikform/ukconstruction email addys we create are routing fine and none existent emails are being bounced. However, this still doesn't explain to me why every single email address from my entire organisation was deleted, I'm also scared to change anything again in case it resets them again. To get them back I simply changed the @interserveis.co.uk policy to @interserveis1.co.uk, set it back again and when it asked to update I said yes. That method has not allowed for all the none standard email addresses we had nore any of the kwikform ones that were setup. Perhaps you can comment on my methods and ensure that I am doing correctly? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday Haiku
Syllables are not Haiku's be all and end all. Sounds are not meanings. A Tuesday morning The week stretches out ahead. Daydream time away. London summer rain Pollen washed to the tarmac. Air flows through nostrils. Seasonal setting Portray an objective scene With depths of insight. Person at a desk Creating haikus for fun Sound like Yoda does. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 June 2003 06:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday Haiku I can't count to five. I cannot count to seven. Guess I'll go to bed. Wait a sec! Check that! I'll count syllables again First one's five-six-five. That nonwithstanding, My post was all screwed up. Oops! Seven-five-seven. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP One man's Spam is another man's UCE. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox enabled users in root domain.
Forestprep was run on the root domain, Domainprep was run on both domains. There are Exchange related attributes, can you give me a specific attribute that would ensure that RUS is working. I will compare with an account in the child domain. --- Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was domainprep run in the parent domain? Does the user's mailbox get stamped with the appropriate attributes by the RUS? -Original Message- From: chuck robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:46 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Mailbox enabled users in root domain. Subject: Mailbox enabled users in root domain. Have w2k sp3 root domain, w2k3 child domain. Exchange 2000 sp3 installed on a member server in the child domain. When I mailbox enable a user in the root domain, it is not available in the GAL nor can I connect to mailbox from an Outlook client. A RUS entry is created for both domains. No apparent DNS issues. Chuck _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving of the MTA Database
I am trying to move the MTA database on a Exch2K machine. I have followed the procedures documented in q259896. When I run the MTACHECK utility, I get the following error: Integrity checker was unable to create MTACHECK.OUT directory. According to the article, the MTACHECK.OUT folder should be recreated automatically. I have verified the new folder structure is identical to the old folder structure. I have also verified the permissions are identical. Have also tried manually creating the MTACHECK.OUT folder with the same result. Thanks, Sam Evensen Systems Engineer, System Services Sunbeam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Calendar/mailbox rights
I would like to share out a few users calendars, not just free/busy but the true calendar to a few other users. I do not want those users to have full mailbox rights to these mailboxes, just the calendar. Is this possible in E2K? Could you please provide a resource. Thanks. _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar/mailbox rights
use Delegates -Original Message- From: The Geek Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Calendar/mailbox rights I would like to share out a few users calendars, not just free/busy but the true calendar to a few other users. I do not want those users to have full mailbox rights to these mailboxes, just the calendar. Is this possible in E2K? Could you please provide a resource. Thanks. _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA with SSL
I seem to be having a problem attaching documents through OWA using SSL. Without SSL, everything works fine but with SSL, whenever I try attaching a document, it comes up with a 404 error. Has anyone had this error before or seen something like this? This is on an E2k front-end server with sp3. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA with SSL
Carmila, Have you made any adjustments to the default OWA logon page? I.E., changed it from https://servername/exchange to say... https://servername/webmail/usa? If so, you could be having the same problem with the ISAPI upload .DLL file that we did. Put a copy of that .DLL in the new path and point the attachments page at that path. I think that's what we did to fix the problem. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with SSL I seem to be having a problem attaching documents through OWA using SSL. Without SSL, everything works fine but with SSL, whenever I try attaching a document, it comes up with a 404 error. Has anyone had this error before or seen something like this? This is on an E2k front-end server with sp3. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA with SSL
James, Yes we did change it to https://webmail/US. I'll give this a shot and let you know. Thanks, Carmila -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Carmila, Have you made any adjustments to the default OWA logon page? I.E., changed it from https://servername/exchange to say... https://servername/webmail/usa? If so, you could be having the same problem with the ISAPI upload .DLL file that we did. Put a copy of that .DLL in the new path and point the attachments page at that path. I think that's what we did to fix the problem. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with SSL I seem to be having a problem attaching documents through OWA using SSL. Without SSL, everything works fine but with SSL, whenever I try attaching a document, it comes up with a 404 error. Has anyone had this error before or seen something like this? This is on an E2k front-end server with sp3. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft to kill popular Linux antivirus product (Was - MS Purc hase)
http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,82045,00. html?SKC=security-82045 (Link may wrap) Doesn't really surprise me... -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: MS Purchase totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for Exchange? :) This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scan Gateway
We're in the exploring on the infrastructure on our Network to be ready for Win2k. There are some area which is in question marks. Email Scanning Gateway to be places on the DMZ. e.g. TrendMicro/Mailsweeper. Should it be place in different box or should it be place in the same box with the Front End Server? So far, we have been consult by 2 supplier. One said it's better to put different box, because put in one box with FE is useless. Reason is if email came into the FE, and only then the Scan Gateway scan the mail is too late. The virus already came into the FE, scan will not help. And another one supplier said it's ok to put into same box with FE. Another question is for Win2k Environment, is DNS very important? Once DNS down, and no cache available, does it mean clients cannot log on to the network? Thanks Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scan Gateway
I would advise to put your gateway on a separate box. I don't know how big your network is, but for 100 users, the gateway could be a simple PC. As for DNS, W2K/AD is all about DNS, DNS, DNS. Plan on having 2 DNS servers. For that matter, plan on having 2 DC/GC's. So make each of those a DNS server as well. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scan Gateway We're in the exploring on the infrastructure on our Network to be ready for Win2k. There are some area which is in question marks. Email Scanning Gateway to be places on the DMZ. e.g. TrendMicro/Mailsweeper. Should it be place in different box or should it be place in the same box with the Front End Server? So far, we have been consult by 2 supplier. One said it's better to put different box, because put in one box with FE is useless. Reason is if email came into the FE, and only then the Scan Gateway scan the mail is too late. The virus already came into the FE, scan will not help. And another one supplier said it's ok to put into same box with FE. Another question is for Win2k Environment, is DNS very important? Once DNS down, and no cache available, does it mean clients cannot log on to the network? Thanks Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scan Gateway
Our Environment only have 275users internally, and another 50users access from overseas using OWA or POP3. Do you have any reason why should the gateway to be run on separate box? Thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scan Gateway I would advise to put your gateway on a separate box. I don't know how big your network is, but for 100 users, the gateway could be a simple PC. As for DNS, W2K/AD is all about DNS, DNS, DNS. Plan on having 2 DNS servers. For that matter, plan on having 2 DC/GC's. So make each of those a DNS server as well. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scan Gateway We're in the exploring on the infrastructure on our Network to be ready for Win2k. There are some area which is in question marks. Email Scanning Gateway to be places on the DMZ. e.g. TrendMicro/Mailsweeper. Should it be place in different box or should it be place in the same box with the Front End Server? So far, we have been consult by 2 supplier. One said it's better to put different box, because put in one box with FE is useless. Reason is if email came into the FE, and only then the Scan Gateway scan the mail is too late. The virus already came into the FE, scan will not help. And another one supplier said it's ok to put into same box with FE. Another question is for Win2k Environment, is DNS very important? Once DNS down, and no cache available, does it mean clients cannot log on to the network? Thanks Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
