SP 4 problems
While upgrading to sp4 (Exchange 5.5), I got the following error: The specified service is disabled and cannot be started: Microsoft Windows NT ID no:0xc0020422 When I go into Exch Admin I get the following error: Extension SMTP could not be loaded. An error occured during file replication. Unable to find the extension .dll file with the correct version number. . . The event log says The file version of c:\exchsrvr\add-ins\smtp\i386\imcadmin.dll installed on the local server is not current. Looking at servers in servers in the site for a current version. Can I restore that dll from a backup or is there more to the problem? Mike NT server 4.0 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 - sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SP 4 problems
Plus - I am still receiving mail in public folders (like from this groups), but I can't get mail from other outside sources to my inbox. While upgrading to sp4 (Exchange 5.5), I got the following error: The specified service is disabled and cannot be started: Microsoft Windows NT ID no:0xc0020422 When I go into Exch Admin I get the following error: Extension SMTP could not be loaded. An error occured during file replication. Unable to find the extension .dll file with the correct version number. . . The event log says The file version of c:\exchsrvr\add-ins\smtp\i386\imcadmin.dll installed on the local server is not current. Looking at servers in servers in the site for a current version. Can I restore that dll from a backup or is there more to the problem? Mike NT server 4.0 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 - sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Store.exe and NT backup
Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. The queues are not backing up. Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not not responded. Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs Nt server 4.0 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l c:\backup\backup.log /hc:on /t normal I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
Trend server protect - file-based with the all exchange directories being skipped. Mail Essentials is on the server also with it's anti-virus/content checking protection. Haven't any problems with that in the 3 years it's been on. What antivirus product are you running? File-based or Exchange-aware? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt (Q272570). Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just don't know. Why would you want to do that? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the information store while the backup is running. Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. The queues are not backing up. Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not not responded. Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs Nt server 4.0 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l c:\backup\backup.log /hc:on /t normal I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
(a) On the Task Manager - CPU is 100%. (b) The physical memory is as follows: Total 392Mb Avail 110-112Mb File Cache 26Mb (c) Stopping and starting helps, but then it creeps right back up to 100% (d) Exchange 5.5 sp3 and post 6a security rollup. a) STORE.EXE at 100% CPU is not normal. Typical values for a well used system would be 30 to 50% CPU. b) STORE.EXE can take close to 100% of memory without a worry - but NOT CPU. c) Stop and start the Information Store if you like - it sounds as though it wouldn't do any harm and may do some good. But NOT when the backups are running. d) What version of Exchange, what Service Packs and what hot fixes are you running? Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 July 2002 14:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt (Q272570). Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just don't know. Why would you want to do that? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the information store while the backup is running. Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. The queues are not backing up. Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not not responded. Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs Nt server 4.0 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l c:\backup\backup.log /hc:on /t normal I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
Haven't tried to disable them both yet - I can only imagine the crap my users will open now! Nothing interesting in the event logs for NT backup and Exchange, but I just did notice an error for the Jet database: Event ID: 0 Source: Jet Type: error Category: (4) The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( JET ) could not be found. It contains the following insertion string(s): , (918) , Unexpected Win32 error: 0x10B. but I looked on EventID and others but couldn't find anything on this. What happens if you disable both of them? Also, Anything interesting in the event logs? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup Trend server protect - file-based with the all exchange directories being skipped. Mail Essentials is on the server also with it's anti-virus/content checking protection. Haven't any problems with that in the 3 years it's been on. What antivirus product are you running? File-based or Exchange-aware? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt (Q272570). Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just don't know. Why would you want to do that? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the information store while the backup is running. Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. The queues are not backing up. Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not not responded. Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs Nt server 4.0 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l c:\backup\backup.log /hc:on /t normal I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Store.exe and NT backup
Correct. I haven't made any changes, run any utilities or added/deleted any programs. One morning, I tried to eject the tape after a backup and nothing would happen. I logged onto the server and the backup was still running. I thought that was odd because it about 12 hours after the backup had started. There was nothing in the event logs and nothing stood out of the ordinary. No one else has access to the server but myself. And you havent made any changes or run any Exchange utilities on the database recently? This just started all of a sudden? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup Haven't tried to disable them both yet - I can only imagine the crap my users will open now! Nothing interesting in the event logs for NT backup and Exchange, but I just did notice an error for the Jet database: Event ID: 0 Source: Jet Type: error Category: (4) The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( JET ) could not be found. It contains the following insertion string(s): , (918) , Unexpected Win32 error: 0x10B. but I looked on EventID and others but couldn't find anything on this. What happens if you disable both of them? Also, Anything interesting in the event logs? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup Trend server protect - file-based with the all exchange directories being skipped. Mail Essentials is on the server also with it's anti-virus/content checking protection. Haven't any problems with that in the 3 years it's been on. What antivirus product are you running? File-based or Exchange-aware? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe and NT backup I was reading a Technet articles that the store may be corrupt (Q272570). Even though the criteria listed doesn't all match us, I was wondering if there could still be corruption. Since we don't work any 2nd or 3rd shifts here, I didn't think too much would be missed from 11:00pm to 2:00 if the information store was stopped. It didn't seem like this would be too bad to try to troubleshoot, but I could be wrong. I just don't know. Why would you want to do that? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe and NT backup Forgot one thing - The only thing I haven't tried is stopping the information store while the backup is running. Our store.exe is running at 100%. I know this is normal that NT is supposed to take the resources from that as it needs it. But for the past 3 weeks, it is now taking over 10 hours for the backup of the exchange server when it used to be done in about 3. The priv.edb is only 565M and the pub.edb is 21 M. The backup is only backing up about 4.5G in total (user directories). Response time in Outlook 2000 is not slow. The queues are not backing up. Trend Serverprotect is running on that server, but the exchange directories are being skipped. Nothing new has been added or removed from the server. There is no delay when stopping or starting the information store. No errors (Dr. Watson) have happened and it has not not responded. Nothing out of the ordinary in the event logs Nt server 4.0 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 NTbackup using AT command for backup with the following .bat file: ntbackup backup c: e: ds \\server1 is \\server1 /v /b /e /l c:\backup\backup.log /hc:on /t normal I have also started receiving about 80-100 blank e-mails with no body and no subject starting at the time the backup starts Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: MCP Logo and Title guidelines
http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/mcpexams/policies/logo.asp I am getting new business cards and I am unsure what I can and can't do concerning MCP logo and MCP title. =20 I have seen the guidelines for the Logo and understand them to a certain degree, but what about MCP? Can I have my business card like this: =20 Ron Crumbaker, MCP Job Title =20 Or is that against the rules? =20 =20 I can't find anything about this on Microsoft's site. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Detroit, Michigan. Enjoying our 50 degree June summer. My golf has been cancelled 4 out of 6 weeks already. Getting ready to watch the Red Wings take game 1 of the Stanley Cup tonight. Mike Cape Town - South Africa, here the leased lines change into jungle beat concerts once you are outside the city. One bang is a 0 and two bangs a 1. You need a keen ear and a fast hand to type. Sander -Original Message- From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 June 2002 05:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Milwauke..the dullest tech place in the world. =20 And sleep is over rated. After all...I don't find anything so grate about my three hours a night...or day chuck -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Maui, Hawaii here. It's hot! Gotta go home now and have a nice swim in the ocean. ;-) Aloha Don -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan Malayter Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I found _Mulholland Drive_ pretty darn interesting, although I think there may be laws about shipping that sort of movie overseas. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:13 PM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Where is everyone? Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Rented K-PAX the other day. I liked it. Can't send it to you though. Had to return it to Bockbluster. Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Where is everyone? B, freezing my tender portions off here in Australia :( Send warmthoh and some decent movies to watch :) Glenn. - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:35 AM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? me too LI, NY -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Wonderful Long Island, NY here... ...back to lurking -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Or do most Exchange admin's crawl out of bed at 1:40 pm? -Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely=20 temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the=20 weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
But there is a me. There is no I in team... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no C: drive. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: oh, sorry, thanks for being so patient with me. I am new here and I didn't realize you weren't being serious. --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT Upgrade question
We're a smaller company( 40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5. Both run great and have been very stable (knock on wood). My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the if it ain't broke, don't fix it mentality? I've already tried the additional functionality route, but they're not buying it. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
Are you the Keymaster? There is only Zuul. (2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference) JP -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive...=20 --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Upgrade question
Bonus? Yeah, right. Our salary people had to take a 10% paycut that was only supposed to be for 1 month. Well, 4 months later that cut is still here. If its not broke you don't need support so who cares if support is available? Eventually the increased functionality may be of value to the higher ups, after one of them hears about some great thing from a buddy on the golf course, etc. Address it then. Meanwhile, show them how much money you've saved them by not upgrading and ask for a portion of those savings as a bonus. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 E5.5 are closer to becoming non-supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT Upgrade question We're a smaller company(40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5. Both run great and have been very stable (knock on wood). My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the if it ain't broke, don't fix it mentality? I've already tried the additional functionality route, but they're not buying it. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic document is considered a confidential and/or privileged communication between John Burnham Insurance Services and the addressee(s). If the recipient(s) of this email communication is not the addressee(s), such recipient(s) is strictly prohibited from photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this email or its contents and/or attachment(s) in any way. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender listed above by any contact means listed. Thank you! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Alternate Ricipient Issue
Yes I am. Upgrade the IMS to SP4. It addressed some issues. Are you doing this with a custom recipient for the alternate recipient entry? -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Alternate Ricipient Issue I have a user that wanted his mail sent to an alternate recipient along with his work mail account. He is getting the mail in both accounts, but this message is coming back from the postmaster (eeacable.com) here at work. Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:12:48 -0500 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:11:35 -0500 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Energy Electric ;l=SERVER10203251611H4B6P8LQ MSEXCH:IMS:Energy Electric Assembly:eeacable:SERVER1 3550 (000B099C) 550 No [EMAIL PROTECTED] user here (or domain for forward) The [EMAIL PROTECTED] was the address the mail was sent from. Any ideas? Thanks Exchange 5.5 sp3 NT 4 sp6a Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need help with edb*.log files
Is anyone using circular logging? and if so, for what reason(s)? I just looked and saw that I was using it but was reading in the disaster recovery why it's good NOT to use it. Mike Circular logging = BAD on mailbox server 200 logs in one day? Couple of things that it could be but it sounds like you might have a Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message Looping Message. Stephen -Original Message- From: Robert Williams To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11/12/01 11:59 AM Subject: RE: I need help with edb*.log files I found this.so I will go with it PSS ID Number: Q240145 Article last modified on 10-10-1999 winnt:5.5 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OFF topic **
http://www.5star-shareware.com/Utilities/General/keytext.html or search on keytext. Keytext is a very robust macro and keyboard stroke recorder. You can record keystrokes, mouse movements, left and right clicks and double clicks too. Mike Hi all do you know of any Freeware telnet or similar product that will let me to automate the following in a batch file telnet ip login password change tu superuser mode run some commands logout from that server the batch file should be run froma WindowsPc to telnet to a Unix server. TIA -ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virus anyone?
Sometimes, if my curiosity is killing me, I'll copy the exe to a disk and then put it on a test machine that I have that's not hooked up to the network (not even a NIC in it) and fire it off there. If it does any damage, there's nothing lost but now you have the knowledge without having to do the recovery. Mike Has anyone else received an email like the one below? The attachment was start.exe. Fortunately, we are blocking all executables. I can't find any reference on Trend's or Symantec's website, but it seems a little fishy that a former CIA office would be sending his resume as an executable to a clothing manufacturer * From: Charles J. Mascialino Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 9:20 AM Subject: career of more than twenty=20 Officer with the Central Intelligence Agency. My cousin Donna Mazzaferro suggested I get in touch with you. I am attaching a copy of my formal resume outlining my work history, having recently received authorization to confirm my career in the CIA. That resume highlights the fact that throughout my CIA career, I consistently performed extremely successfully as a recruiter of clandestine sources of information of varied types for the American government. ** Thanks. Tara Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sircam Virus
We use Mail Essentail for Exchange 5.5. I haven't had any problems with it, the a/v goes out and ftp's the latest viurs definitions at some off hour and sends me the notice. It can block atachments and will also scan attachments for macros and clean/quarantine them. You can also set it up for anti-spam. Mike On that thought - Is anyone here using mailEssentials? We are still getting pounded with Sircam also and are considering using = this mailEssentials on our win2k smtp server in the dmz to filter mail = before getting to Antigen on our smtp connector. The goal is to better filter = mail of spamming, AV, etc before getting to exch IMS. To that end, I'd appreciate anyone's thoughts/experiences re this product. thx for the feedback.byron -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sircam Virus We're still getting all three, Sircam, Magistr, and Hybris. = Interestingly, all three of them show up in the notifications I get from Antigen as = having either unknown or spoofed senders. Because of this, Antigen isn't able = to send out its alerts to the people who are sending the messages, so, = they probably aren't getting any messages back telling them they're = infected. Also, I don't think any of them actually use Outlook to send out the = virus, so it would be fairly easy for the infected computer's owner to be blissfully unaware of the infection. I think this is the secret of = their longevity.=20 -Peter -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sircam Virus Actually, we are getting hit with a ton of Magistr Joel K. Osborn Information Systems Technical Specialist Wisconsin Department of Transportation [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sircam Virus and the other half are Hybris, right? *mutter* -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand.=20 - -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sircam Virus Yea. It's still runnign amuck. Almost half of our intercepted viruses = are still SirCam. Joel K. Osborn Information Systems Technical Specialist Wisconsin Department of Transportation [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sircam Virus Hello, Is everyone still getting many attachments infected by the W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus? Any many of you my NAV for Exchange is setup = to delete any attachments that may have this virus in them. Im getting a = ton of Admin Alerts of attachments infected with this virus being deleted. = Just want to know if others are getting a lot too. Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else.=20 _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Store.exe is taking 100%
Or University of Phoenix in Detroit. Mike It's not too far from Miami University of Ohio. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check for lots of server activity, like sending lots of email or recalling lots of messages. By the way, how do you get a California University of Pennsylvania? (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Haiku Friday!
Nimda hit us hard My IIS server's dead Now time to re-patch I said patch. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nimda Removal tool
Will (from this list) had sent me this link - he was helping me out on this issue. He's probably too busy to post this so I thought I would. Symantec has created a removal tool for the Nimda virus. http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Nimda
I got nailed too. Not from an e-mail - I currently block all exe's. We must have gotten it from an infected web page. I already applied the patch for Code Red last month but my problem is a little bigger: I can't log onto the server without getting a Dr Watson error for explorer.exe. The server runs ok, but after I log on and the desktop comes up it generates the error. I can't even got on long enough to run anything. I did get the patch applied for the Transversal vulnerability, but I'm not sure if that helped. Now our network seems to be slowing down and people are having printing troubles too. Some people can't get their Outlook open - not enough system resources. . . We're all up to date with Virus software for Nimda, but the .eml files are still being created - but not on every machine. Wierd. How do you find the machine that's affecting the rest of the network? What virus software is everyone using for their NT servers (not for Exchange, but NT)? Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dr. Watson (was New Virus / Worm??)
On my Exchange box, when I try to log on, I keep getting Dr. Watson error that says the following: Explorer.exe Exception Access Violation (0xc005), Address:0x77f7d18e Everytime I close that down, another one pops up in about 5 seconds. There isn't even enough time to open the Run command to run a latest patch. The patch for Code Red was installed last month, but I can't get on to the server to install the latest one. Any ideas? This started yesterday when the nimda virus came through. Has anyone figured out hoe to stop the creation of *.eml files on the network too? NT 4 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
