RE: Real world experience
Just left an HP session at TechEd. Although there were obviously vendor-specified disclaimers, the speaker's verdict was pretty simple -- Clustering just isn't meant for Exchange. Like asking a car manufacturer to fix that whole smashing-when-you-drive-your-car-into-a-brick-wall sorta thing. It's not broke. It's just not smart. stemy -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:38 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Real world experience Subject: RE: Real world experience You mean you don't believe MS has fixed this in Exchange2K3 ? :) Thanks -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Real world experience Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange... (Am I sounding a little repetitive here? I seem to say that alot) -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions I will spare the gory 'political' details as we are in the midst of trying to consolidate 35 '5.5' Exchange servers in 35 domains to as little servers as possible. We're looking at an Exchange 2K3 rollout and probably a hybrid AD using MS's meta directory (maybe). The real question is I am looking for real world experience with something similar to what we are going to from a Exchange 2K shop. Essentially we'll be looking at 5,000 users (.5 GB per mailbox) to start with another 5,000 in phase 2 and 5,000 more in phase 3. With a new 2K3 AD, we'll probably consider at least 2 DC's and one dedicated server for OWA. The main mail servers and storage is really the number cruncher. It's looking like a 3 server cluster and external storage (AV also has to be factored). All client stations will be on at least 10 if not 100 switched lines, GB speed on the WAN backbone. I have gone to Dell and other places to run the traditional load 'configuration wizard' and I have always preferred to error on the side of you can never have too much power. I would like to hear from people using SAN's or the like to account for TB size storage and backup. How close was the configuration load wizards to what you really required. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday Haiku
What have I learned here? I need a wireless toy No, not one like that I want to check mail While sitting in a session I want better toys Drunk geeks aren't pretty Not enough girls for them all They need cold showers Walking around here All these Exchange Guru shirts Most cannot spell it Some sessions were good Other sessions were long naps I still hate clusters. stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RUS
All RUS's should point to the same DC/GC. Let AD replication carry the changes around the org. Otherwise you risk writing conflicting data to 2 dif't dc's in your environment. Yeah, not good Stemy -Original Message- From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:57 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: RUS Subject: RUS I have 2 W2K DCs and they're both are GC server. Right now there are two RUS, one is the enterprise point to DC1 and one is the organization also point to DC1. Technically, I can create another RUS and point it to DC2 so the GAL gets update as well , but I read somewhere that all I have to do is change the Enterprise RUS to DC1 and the Org RUS to DC2. Is that true? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday Haiku
Actually, there are 2 shirts The one that Chris is talking about is from the MessageOne party at SpeedZone on Sunday night. It has the TechEd 2003 logo with a nice red X over TechEd and a handwritten MEC above it. Very nice. The one I was referring to was from the Aelita booth. It just has Exchange Guru written on it in nice big letters. Also very nice, but unfortunately, handed out willy-nilly, and therefore, not as cool. I think that some of the people that I saw wearing them could barely spell IT -Original Message- From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:03 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Friday Haiku Subject: RE: Friday Haiku Got a pix of that shirt you can share with us? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Friday Haiku I have to tell you all I have never had a shirt generate so much interaction for me!! I am curious if anyone else had similar experiences . . . 1. exactly 6 people offered to buy the shirt off of me. 2. exactly 9 different people at the party last night had pictures taken with my shirt. And I mean my shirt. I had to turn around so they could be photographed standing next to the back of it. 3. At the expo yesterday someone from MS approached me and asked me why I found it necessary to cross out Tech Ed on my shirt. He seemed to think I made this shirt up just for myself and not that it was a group shirt and was quite dismayed. As if this was my personal political statement. I told him it was given to me at a party for a group of Exchange admins; not a personal vendetta, etc. Of course, I said, as long as you are here I am disappointed you canceled MEC and don't disagree with the back of the shirt. And went on with my grievances . . . :) In the end he thanked me! :) Chris - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:02 AM Subject: Friday Haiku What have I learned here? I need a wireless toy No, not one like that I want to check mail While sitting in a session I want better toys Drunk geeks aren't pretty Not enough girls for them all They need cold showers Walking around here All these Exchange Guru shirts Most cannot spell it Some sessions were good Other sessions were long naps I still hate clusters. stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
I'm in the middle asleep in them Start snoring next time so I'll know where you are :) A couple, like Andy's, have been really good and very useful A few, like this WMI one, zonked me out quick... Stemy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [TX] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:43 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd I'm asleep at the back of several of the Exchange specific presentations. Except for the one Andy Webb did. - Original Message - From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:10 PM Subject: TechEd Who else is here? stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June
02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+-¦-xm¶ÿÃ
,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\
öªy²'µêßi¶Úþ)íÙl¥ªä+-r¿r嬦W§µêÞÅÈZ{f¡jx
b²èº{.nÇ+·¦j)m¢W½ç±r§él³ §Ê!jx .+-iX¬µ§f{0Êy ¢
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
I beg to differ. And worldwide deployment numbers would certainly back me up, but this isn't the Care Bear List. No Nick at Night here. We don't dance around in a purple dinosaur outfit singing I love you...you love me well... Most of us don't. But I can guarantee that How to build a DR environment has been answering dozens of times (if not hundreds) in the archives. I've seen many publicly available articles on how to do it. Try google. But if you're going to come with a question, then at least do your homework and say I've read this article on doing this action, but I don't understand this point. That way, the list is a resource and NOT an attempt to avoid work. Just my $0.02 stemy -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with
properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet caf.
Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at
home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever implemented the network here
to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003
12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June
02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
â²Úh²PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(ú«qïÞÅÈ_j¨mg{^özm§ÿâÊZ®Ib²×(÷
¸§þ\«Êez{^ì\
©àz¶j zV§éà+!N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²)åËZvh§³
§Ê
RE: TechEd
I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up
and move around
I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the
grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt...
Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one
(to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution).
What are the exact error codes within the events?
stemy
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on
either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can
find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have
rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr Z Zvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+-¦-xm¶ÿÃ
,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\
öªy²'µêßi¶Úþ)íÙl¥ªä+-r¿r嬦W§µêÞÅÈZ{f¡jx
b²èº{.nÇ+·¦j)m¢W½ç±r§él³ §Ê!jx .+-iX¬µ§f{0Êy ¢
RE: TechEd
Anyone got a spare pass for the IT Pro party tonight...
Got the Developer party pass and forgot to pick up the IT pro party pass...
Those SQL people are a bit too weird for me :(
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up
and move around
I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the
grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt...
Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one
(to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution).
What are the exact error codes within the events?
stemy
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on
either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can
find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have
rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr Z Zvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxVmyzrvi
â²Úh²PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(ú«qïÞÅÈ_j¨mg{^özm§ÿâÊZ®Ib²×(÷
¸§þ\«Êez{^ì\
©àz¶j zV§éà+!N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²)åËZvh§³
§Ê
RE: TechEd
But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:37 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: RE: TechEd No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with properly implemented MS technologies... Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet café. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever implemented the network here to please CJ -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TechEd
What's this Exchange 5.5 thing that I keep hearing people talk about? stemy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd What's a HOSTS file? ;o) - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: RE: TechEd But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:37 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: offline defrag and 195 Gb store E2K
What about creating additional stores and then moving the mailboxes to the new stores. Kill 2 birds with 1 stone - reduce quantity of whitespace - get rid of your obscenely large priv -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:44 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: offline defrag and 195 Gb store E2K Subject: offline defrag and 195 Gb store E2K Having trouble removing whitespace from 195 Gb store. Is there an issue on DB size for this to work? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kodiak
The next version of Exchange is Titanium and due out around Q2 2003 (ballpark). It is basically Exchange 6.5. The next major version Exchange will have a SQL backend. Don't plan on Q4 03. -Original Message- From: Hilary Cotter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, July 11, 2002 7:48 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Kodiak Subject: Kodiak does anyone know when Kodiak is due to be finished? I thought it was due in the 4th quarter of 2003. How about Sharepoint.net? I have read some articles claiming that at this years TechEd it was announced that the next version of Exchange would have a SQL Server backend. I know that this issue has been breeched here before, but I was wondering if any of you have any updates on this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot access some mail after repair
ExMerge -Original Message- From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:26 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Cannot access some mail after repair Subject: RE: Cannot access some mail after repair I figured this out and performed the command you mentioned below. What happened is that he deleted all the corrupted mail. About 1200 mail. Is there a way to restore them other than from a backup? The problem is that I must use a backup from 3 days ago, cause the last 2 backup contain the corrupted mail. Which mean that all new received mail will be gone. You have any sugestion how to do this? By the way thanks for your reply. Michel Fayad -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 5:39 PM Posted To: Lyris MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Cannot access some mail after repair Subject: RE: Cannot access some mail after repair Yes. You have logical corruption in your database after running the repair. 1. Stop the IS 2. Open a command prompt and go to \exchsrvr\bin and run isinteg -fix -pri -test alltests without the quotes. 3. Run the command again 4. Mount stores and check for any further issues. -Original Message- From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:18 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Cannot access some mail after repair Subject: Cannot access some mail after repair After performing a repair of an Exchange Database I have problem opening some mails. When trying to open it I receive this message: Cannot open this item. When I try to delete it I will receive this message: This item could not be deleted, it was either moved or already deleted or access was denied. The weired thing is that I have this problem only with email from an external domain. Anybody has an idea how to solve this? Thanks, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large IS DB
Event 1221 will give you a guaranteed recovery number The /MS will give you a best case for recovery number -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:58 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Large IS DB Subject: RE: Large IS DB I only mention it because you haven't, but.. XADM: Database Does Not Shrink after Several Mailbox Deletions [Q192189] talks of waiting a while before kicking off the eseutil. I don't think it applies since you've done several offline defrags over time. Can't hurt though. Also have a look at XADM: Determining Database Free Space with Exchange 5.5 SP1 [Q195914] which would give a truer picture of free space. -Original Message- From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 May 2002 19:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Large IS DB We have done a number of IS compresses to try to resolve it and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of the reported whitespace in the event logs). -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Large IS DB Yeah, the place where you see the sizes of the mailboxes doesn't have the option to view hidden, it shows all things. It's only a guide but isn't usually that far out. I know you've said you're reporting 2GB of white space but have you tried an offline defrag, in my experience you'll gain more than it reports as spare. -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 May 2002 19:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Large IS DB The report is the dump of the total size of all mailboxes (as seen from Exchange Admin). There are some large mailboxes on the server, but the total space taken up by both hidden and visible mailboxes does not total more then 8 GBthus my delima. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Large IS DB Do you have any hidden mailboxes that are not showing up in your reports? Ever clean out he Admin box? Or the AV box? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paragon400 Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Large IS DB Fellow exchange admins\engineers\gurus, Does anyone have any suggestions for this situation? Config: Exchange 5.5 SP4 WinNT 4.0 SP6 Priv.edb = 45GB Deleted Item Cache = 11.5 GB Deleted Item retention was 7 days, but in an effort to fix this I set it to 3 days to see if it would make a difference. The DIC (ok..I can see the jokes coming, but hey.it's Friday) was 15 GB and after the change it shrunk to 11.5 GB after a couple days. Whitespace = Event ID's 1221 state that on average there is 2GB of whitespace When I look at the mailbox sizes through Exchange Admin and do a dump to CSV it totals out to be about 7 GB, yet the Priv is 45 GB. Backups are taking extremely long and I wanted to see if anyone had a suggestions as to what, if any, the problem could be here. We have done a number of IS compresses and only gotten about 2-4 GB of space (no surprise because of the reported whitespace). But with what Exchange Admin is reporting I am concerned. Thanks for any suggestions and for those in the states..have a good relaxing holiday. Best regards, Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Redundancy
Just confirmed last night and Microsoft classifies Geoclusters as a Vendor-supported solution -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, May 18, 2002 12:24 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange Redundancy Subject: Re: Exchange Redundancy I don't think so. MS does support Geoclusters ... as long as you didn't do special tweaking and the hardware is in the HCL list. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 2:51 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy I guess that's all good and fine unless you ever need PSS for anything. I'm betting that falls firmly in the realm of unsupported configuration -Original Message- From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:52 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange Redundancy Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy We are using an Exchange 2000 active/passive cluster with NSI's Geocluster product. Geocluster extends MS Cluster Services by allowing each server in the cluster to have their own disk storage (no shared disk as in traditional clustering). Geocluster has worked well with Exchange 2000 and we've had few problems. Tom Bloom Texas AM University -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Did Double-take mirror the entire Information Store in real time? I know Octopus would choke if someone tried to mirror a very large file. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy I have used Doubletake and Co-standby in the Exchange 5.5 and co-standby is the Winner in my book. If I ever get the ex2k up and mailboxes moved over (almost done) I will use co-standby for that as well. -Original Message- From: David Weinstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Clustering will do that but you will not get load balancing - Microsoft's implementation of clustering is hot standby -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy It's still called clustering. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Redundancy Having just had our sole Exchange server go down, is there a way of having a redundant server (or load balancing) that is an exact replicar (in terms of user mailboxes etc..)? Basically i am after failover redundacy, so that if one server goes down it will not effect users abilities to send and recive mail. - Is this practical? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
Wander? Try a good general purpose hardware diag like ForeFront And it was the guy beside me that threw it... I swear! -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:33 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? His name was Fred. He gave me the same warnings about the -1018. Unfortunately My hardware vendor is not one person. That machine is a generic Intel machine that has been an Exchange server for years. It has an Adaptec 394x controller, 512 MB or RAM, two pretty fast, name brand hard drives, etc. As you know, that makes it worse as you don't know where to begin. Its like an umpire at a MLB game getting beaned by a bottle of Bud...who in the world threw it? Arch -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? People who bitch about Microsoft (PSS at least) are generally also the same people who are incapable of formulating an intelligent technical question. You ought to be on the phone with your hardware vendor at the moment as well, your -1018 error is a hardware related issue, and you'll need some parts swapage to keep this from happening again. Oh and take good notes from the PSS feller and tell him we all say hi. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? I just got off the phone with them. I don't know why everyone bitch#s about Microsoftthat guy could not have been nicer. He confirmed my problem and is helping me get it fixed as I type this. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Arch -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? 1018 errors? Oh oh. I would call PSS. Dont wait on us. Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
Also check file-level AV, NTFS compression, write-back caching, and open-file managers... In case Fred didn't mention those -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:33 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? His name was Fred. He gave me the same warnings about the -1018. Unfortunately My hardware vendor is not one person. That machine is a generic Intel machine that has been an Exchange server for years. It has an Adaptec 394x controller, 512 MB or RAM, two pretty fast, name brand hard drives, etc. As you know, that makes it worse as you don't know where to begin. Its like an umpire at a MLB game getting beaned by a bottle of Bud...who in the world threw it? Arch -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? People who bitch about Microsoft (PSS at least) are generally also the same people who are incapable of formulating an intelligent technical question. You ought to be on the phone with your hardware vendor at the moment as well, your -1018 error is a hardware related issue, and you'll need some parts swapage to keep this from happening again. Oh and take good notes from the PSS feller and tell him we all say hi. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? I just got off the phone with them. I don't know why everyone bitch#s about Microsoftthat guy could not have been nicer. He confirmed my problem and is helping me get it fixed as I type this. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Arch -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ? 1018 errors? Oh oh. I would call PSS. Dont wait on us. Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is a TAM?
Technical Account Manager for Premier and Alliance customers of Microsoft -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 6:16 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: What is a TAM? Subject: What is a TAM? In the link below there is a reference to contact a TAM for the mbinfo app http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm A2: There's an app called mbinfo which can extract it for you. Contact your TAM for a copy if you don't have it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
Jedi Mind Trick This is not the drive you are looking for /Jedi Mind Trick -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:34 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Drive m: Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the possibility of the existence of such a thing. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drive m: Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
I've heard of lots of people using drive M extensively! They change permissions And destroy their database They scan it for viruses. And destroy their database They play with it cuz it's there And destroy their database -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Drive m: Subject: RE: Drive m: M: drive just allows access to your Exchange server via the file system (i.e. Windows Explorer). Although it may have some applications, I've never heard of anyone using it extensively. You definitely can live without it. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drive m: Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict? Do we need it? Thanks, Arch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
It wsa a really good idea based on the assumption that if an administrator didn't know what it was, he would find out BEFORE doing anything with it On second thought, it was just a bad idea -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:09 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Drive m: Subject: RE: Drive m: Sure there is. He has evidence. I have evidence. We've all seen it. It was just an unfortunate implementation on MS part. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive... --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan the M: and gets an error thrown... my backup software.. which also uses the disaster recovery otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an access denied.. and when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and try to check it.. shows me all the folders of the informtaion store.. but nothing beyond that.. says that I can see the permissions.. but cant change anything on that... I think we should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently the norton anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on the anti-virus software to avoid scanning the M: -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the possibility of the existence of such a thing. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drive m: Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K upgrade question
I hear that on Bush's first draft, the Axis of Evil was actually Iraq, North Korea, and Active Directory Connectors -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:03 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: E2K upgrade question Subject: RE: E2K upgrade question Finish the upgrade and get rid of the EVILADC. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jerzy Setmajer Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K upgrade question Not sure what we are missing so I thought I would ask the group. Test environment: Exchange 5.5 sp4 E2K SP2 2 way trust We used E2K ADC to populate AD. The W2K users created cannot access the mailboxes in E5.5 When we move the mailboxes to E2K the NT users can access the maibox on the E2K server but the W2K users still cannot. What could be wrong? Humbly requesting imput. Jerzy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Mailboxes
Set the Restrict Send to 0kb and see who screams -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 10, 2002 5:51 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Active Mailboxes Subject: Active Mailboxes I have been asked to produce a list of active mailboxes for Exchange 5.5, how would you go about this task? I guess I could do a dump of the Mailbox resources for the last logon time, but I seem to remember this field is not particularly reliable, in addition the service account seems to often logon to accounts. Regards, Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Smtp connector gone mad?
That's still not a reason for using an SMTP connector. E2k doesn't need an SMTP connector for sending an receiving internet mail regardless of the number of internet domain names being hosted. SMTP Virtual Server handles the transport Recipient policies handle the multiple domains -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:47 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad? Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad? Yeah I know I have not provided all the info, sorry. We have multiple domain names and want to accept messages into the org from the internet via this connector. Regards Leo You don't need an SMTP connector for sending and receiving email. that might just be what the SMTP virtual server is for? -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad? Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad? We want to be able to accept incoming email from the internet. Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Redundancy
I guess that's all good and fine unless you ever need PSS for anything. I'm betting that falls firmly in the realm of unsupported configuration -Original Message- From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:52 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange Redundancy Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy We are using an Exchange 2000 active/passive cluster with NSI's Geocluster product. Geocluster extends MS Cluster Services by allowing each server in the cluster to have their own disk storage (no shared disk as in traditional clustering). Geocluster has worked well with Exchange 2000 and we've had few problems. Tom Bloom Texas AM University -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Did Double-take mirror the entire Information Store in real time? I know Octopus would choke if someone tried to mirror a very large file. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy I have used Doubletake and Co-standby in the Exchange 5.5 and co-standby is the Winner in my book. If I ever get the ex2k up and mailboxes moved over (almost done) I will use co-standby for that as well. -Original Message- From: David Weinstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Clustering will do that but you will not get load balancing - Microsoft's implementation of clustering is hot standby -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy It's still called clustering. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Redundancy Having just had our sole Exchange server go down, is there a way of having a redundant server (or load balancing) that is an exact replicar (in terms of user mailboxes etc..)? Basically i am after failover redundacy, so that if one server goes down it will not effect users abilities to send and recive mail. - Is this practical? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
TINSB [1] [1] There is no Secret Cabal [2] [2] Which does not exist -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We actually do award points over at the Secret Cabal [1] for funniest posts. [1] Which does not exist. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Never said I wanted that. I just think so of you people need to get some personal skills. If you don't like helping people don't do it, but if you don't mind, why the attitude? Don't bother answering, it is a rhetorical question. We all get annoyed in answering the same question time and time again, but be a little constructive. I am not being critical, I will leave that to the *experts*, I just don't understand why there is this big attitude problem. Some of the emails spend more space whinging and complaining about people writing stupid questions, then they do giving answers. Gary's post was just one example. Why write Bite me? Why make the smart-arse comment in the first place? Why not just ignore it? Why not just write Read the FAQ or Read the on-line help. The following quote is from section 1.11 in the FAQ: A: None whatsoever. While you may be tempted to wrest mirth from such an annoyance as someone bothering 4000 other subscribers with a test message, there is absolutely nothing you can post in response that will ameliorate this particular trespass. Whatever you are thinking of saying, be it You failed or Did I pass? has surely been said before, and perhaps was not a knee-slapper in the first place. Just let it go. Please explain why it is unacceptable to bother 4000 other subscribers with a test message, but not unacceptable to bother 4000 odd subscribers with unproductive and ridiculous drivel like some of the stuff we see on the list in response to genuine queries (even if the answer is in the manual/help!). Do you think you are cool or something by sending these sorts of messages? Is there some sort of competition where you have an award for the person who can flame the most posters? I don't know, I thought most people here were working for a living, but some of these emails could have come from a primary school. Bottom line is, there is a difference between being short with someone, where you can answer the question and point them in the right direction and make sure they know they screwed up by not checking in the first place, and the stupid emails with contribute nothing. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system.
RE: Smtp connector gone mad?
You have an SMTP conenctor why? -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:19 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad? Subject: Smtp connector gone mad? We have an exchange 2000 server that we joined to the Exchange 5.5 org/site. When I setup an smtp connector on the exchange 2000 server (including adding all the domain names I want, mail from the exchange 5.5 server directed to the exchange 2000 users gets picked up by the smtp connector and eventually ends up in the queue undeliverable messages?? When I delete the smtp connector everything goes back to normal. What tick box have I missed? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5
Change switches... Check large packet pings... Etc -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:13 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5 Subject: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5 We did a couple of changes on our network (ISP change, IP address change, added firewall), soon after that we started to have undeliverables emails when emails have more than 1Mb attach. Now we have same problem but with all emails with attachments (no matter the size). It's on and off, I mean sometimes it delivered the email and sometimes it won't. Any ideas about what can be the problem? Thanks. Jorge Cardenas. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a
Upgrade Exchange SP2 to SP4 Upgrade NT SP4 to SP6a Problem should disappear -Original Message- From: Neil Luczynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:52 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a Subject: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a Anyone out there had problems upgrading an NT4 box at Sp4 running Exch 5.5 Sp2 to NT4Sp6a. We recently done this on our servers and all the NT4Sp6a boxes could not make external RPC connections. Exchange boxes still on NT4Sp4 could connect OK to the Sp6a boxes, but not vice versa. Any help or ideas gratefully recieved. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Dear Malik, We should not condescend anyone. If you don't have any sense of humour, please don't show your inadequacy with meaningless statements. Thanks and Regards, Stephen Mynhier -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:35 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Dear Slinger, We should not make fun of anyone. If you don't have any solution please don't show your presence with meaning less statements. Thanks and Regards. Irfan Malik -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Ooh! Ooh! Look everybody, it's URGENT and he posted it twice! Jeez... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now possed the question of disaster recovery. We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server. We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this. The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use. Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange server does not function unless the other one goes down.) Please help - I am in grave danger. Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Policy not being applied
RUS communicates with the AD to stamp an address. If this is failing intermittently, I would check DNS and/or connectivity to the domain controllers. Try NetDiag and DCDiag. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:24 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Policy not being applied Subject: Policy not being applied Everyone, We have created a recipient policy and set its priority to 1. It includes several e-mail addresses (aliases). About once a week this policy stops being applied to new accounts and we have to re-boot the server to get it working again. I understand that it is the recipient update service that is supposed to apply these policies and I have it set to apply them immediately and I have even tried to apply the policy manually and run the update service manually, nothing works until a re-boot. Any ideas?? rick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Private Store Permissions
No... No... Please, no Don't do that -Original Message- From: Ragar, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:04 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Private Store Permissions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Private Store Permissions You have complete access to the file store using the M: drive on the Exchange server through the Exchange Installable File System. Couldn't you just run a cron job that takes out any directories you don't want to exist on a nightly basis? Or if you are worried about data integrity, move the files into some directory layout that you approve of. It could be scripted. Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- From: Allen Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Private Store Permissions I'm looking for a way to prevent users from creating new folders under their Exchange 2000 mailbox on my server. We'll be providing training that 'directs' them not to, but I want to keep them from doing it anyway. Which, of course, they will try to do. Is there a way to prevent the creation of new folders in addition to the default mailbox folders in Exchange 2000? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 SP4 in NT4 - problems after security updates
Sounds like an RPC failure between NT and Win2k with Q311401. This generally happens when you have mismatched encryption levels and NT 4 and Win2k are unable to negotiate 56 bit encryption. See if the issue is resolved by uninstalling Q311401 or contact Microsoft and request hotfix Q322051. Alternately, installing the 128 bit version of SP6a might also resolve this. -Original Message- From: Richard Dann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 1:53 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: 5.5 SP4 in NT4 - problems after security updates Subject: 5.5 SP4 in NT4 - problems after security updates Its a long time since I last posted but I'm wondering whether anyone has any inspiration on the following problem: Exchange 5.5 SP4 server running on NT4 SP6a OWA running on another machine under W2K SP2+SRP1 and all relevant hotfixes. OWA works fine until NT4 SRP, IE5.5SP2 (on top of IE5.5 gold) plus Windows Update security patches installed. Now OWA only works for public access on the W2K box. Mailbox access doesn't authenticate. On NT4 server same effect for mailbox and fails to correctly log onto public access. Normal client access (Outlook any version) OK. Tried reinstalling Exchange SP4, no effect. Any suggestions welcome. TIA regards, Richard Dann regards, Richard Dann Nextra, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For information on products and services click on www.nextra.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: any news on sp3?
Actually, let me correct myself. In order to run E2k on a .Net server, it will require E2k SP4 In order to run E2k with a .Net DC, we'll need E2k SP3 -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:18 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: any news on sp3? Subject: RE: any news on sp3? I thought that first part had not been determined yet. Oh well. The latter has been the case for a long time. Still waiting. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: any news on sp3? No, it will not require Win2k SP3. I am running E2k SP3 on my box just fine with only Win2k SP2. In order to run E2k on a .Net server, however, it will require E2k SP3. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:47 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: any news on sp3? Subject: RE: any news on sp3? What year? Might it require Windows2000 sp3? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: any news on sp3? July is the target date -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: any news on sp3? Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as waiting for the service pack. Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3? info? target date? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error
Ex5.5 Enterprise cannot be upgraded to E2k Std. You have 3 basic choices: 1. ExMerge all mailboxes to PSTs 2. Install an E5.5 Std and move mailboxes then inplace upgrade that server 3. Purchase the E2k Enterprise version -Original Message- From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:52 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error Subject: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error Hi When I try to do an in-place upgrade of Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exchange 2000 I get the following error from the Exchange 2000 Installation Wizard. I have followed the steps. 1) ADC, 2) Forestprep, 3) Domainprep. I was using the Standard version of Exchange 2000. The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Upgrade because: - You must use the same edition of Microsoft Exchange 2000 Setup (Enterprise or Server) as the existing installation Any help.?? TIA Raji ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail
E2k has an MSMail connector ewww -Original Message- From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:10 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail Subject: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail I didn't see a response to my earlier post, so I'll ask a quick question now... Is the MS Mail Connector compatible with Exchange 2000, or do I need an Exchange 5.5 server with the MS Mail Connector and ADC to Exchange 2000? - Karen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Mmm. Wallls.. Slurp! -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:55 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Cerification question Subject: RE: Cerification question Certs are not a sign of competency. They just mean that the person is capable of memorizing braindumps. I interviewed MCSEs that answered the question Explain your NT domain structure in your previous job with an answer like We had ATM coming to the back of our PCs. You've got to be careful with MCSEs that come with huge resumes. There are some ways you can tell if they're good or not though. For example if the candidate writes MCSE with a larger font than his own name, you probably have a clueless wall-licker in your hands. If a person doesn't have certification, it means that he/she has not sat through the tests. That person can be the most knowledgeable guy out there. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
I deal with (new and different) people daily who have worked with Exchange for years but don't know their database from their check file. I wouldn't let them within 20 feet of any Exchange server that I worked on but they are the hired Exchange expert for their company. The fact is that people are people, and certified people are not inherently better than experienced people or vice versa. I think that the best bet is the person who realizes that, regardless of how much he knows, he does not know everything and is always willing and wanting to learn more than he currently knows. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Cerification question Subject: RE: Cerification question Very good points. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question You people talk like you can't have both. Sure there are some paper MCSEs out there but there are also many MCSEs that have mucho experience. Most hiring managers, all things being equal will look at experience first but... then certs. Additionally while experience is the best there are people that have worked in one environment for so long that they know NOTHING about any other capabilities of the hardware/software. They are nearly as bad as the paper MSCE because the scope of their knowledge is so very limited and because of their experience think the only way to run a network is the way they did it at their last job. At least the Paper boyz know they are limited, are willing to learn, cost half as much and don't cause half the drama the experience guy does. They piss me off so much more, that and they usually have no idea as to WHY their last network was set up that way but that it is just the best way. Experience is NOT always the best qualifier either _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange System Manager and WINS
WINS? We don't need no stinkin WINS! Hmmm... Odd, though. I don't have an option in my ESM to create a mailbox. No Exchange Tasks, either -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:58 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange System Manager and WINS Subject: Exchange System Manager and WINS WIN2K SP1(navtive mode) and E2K (native mode) I know I have seen this in writing but am unable to locate it. For the ESM to function properly from a workstation, does that workstation have to point to a WINS server? From my experience, ESM will work when pointing to a WINS server and may or may not work if not. We are having a problem when trying to create mailbox enabled users, the option to create the mailbox does not appear. Even after the user is created and you go to the exchange task, the only option is to enable instant messaging, rendering the account unusable as far as mail is concerned. I know that WINS is not necessary in native mode, but I sure do remember reading that the ESM requires it. Others have told me that we might have a network browsing issue etc If anyone knows of any such literature about this please point me to it or any guidance to make it work without WINS would be great too. Thanks all! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000\OWA question
I would look first at DNS 1. Make certain that the E2k server points to the DNS server for DNS (don't want to miss the obvious) 2. Make certain that the DNS server points to itself (and only itself) for DNS 3. On the E2k box, run NetDiag 4. On the E2k box, run DCDiag and use the /s: switch to point to the DC -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:42 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 2000\OWA question Subject: Exchange 2000\OWA question I am working in a lab environment so I can get more familiar with Exch2k and OWA and I have run into a stumper. I have gotten OWA to work before, but that was when Exch2k was a DC as well. In this case I built the DC and Exch2k as separate machines and I can't seem to get the authentication to work (I am assuming this is my problem). Here is my setup: Server1: Win2k DC (native) SP2 DNS Server2: Win2k Exch2k(mixed) SP2\SP2 After all is setup I create an account and also setup a mailbox for that account. I can connect to the mailbox via IMAP with no problems, but when I go to http://server2/exchange/account I get a log on prompt (where I put in the credentials). It then seems to try to load the page, but then fails with a HTTP 500 Internal server error. Is there something that needs to be done when the Exch2k box is not a DC and you need to access it with the web client? This is just a default installation and beyond creating an account I have not changed any of the defualt settings for Exchange. Thanks for the help steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing multiple domain names internally
And why do we have SMTP connectors? -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:32 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Routing multiple domain names internally Subject: Routing multiple domain names internally Do I need to tick the box on the addresses tab of the SMTP connector Allow messages to be relayed to these domains? I have one org and have multiple smtp addresses and they can come in at any of three of our worldwide smtp connectors (all e2k servers). The recipient policies for all smtp addresses are defined. The mailboxes have their respective smtp addresses defined and all the smtp connectors have all the smtp addresses listed with differeng costs. Is there anything else I need to do, and do I really need to Allow messages to be relayed to these domains? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Questions
Just don't forget the IIS patches (Think MS02-018) -Original Message- From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:07 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA Questions Subject: OWA Questions Pardon the newbies queries! Is there any reason why I should not use Windows 2000 server for my Exchange 5.5 Outlook Web Access server? Can anyone point me to a good step by step book or site? Slipstick.com is pretty good - I am looking for more detail. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Ugh Ugh Ugh -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:05 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Cerification question Subject: Re: Cerification question That is so not fair. I doubt that my three favorite movies would endear me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say, neandrathal, in their choices. M - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Cerification question This may sound odd but there is one golden question that will tell you exactly if the candidate will fit the group or not: What are your three favorite movies? If the person likes similar movies as the general team and sounds smart, than he/she is a good buy. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I deal with (new and different) people daily who have worked with Exchange for years but don't know their database from their check file. I wouldn't let them within 20 feet of any Exchange server that I worked on but they are the hired Exchange expert for their company. The fact is that people are people, and certified people are not inherently better than experienced people or vice versa. I think that the best bet is the person who realizes that, regardless of how much he knows, he does not know everything and is always willing and wanting to learn more than he currently knows. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Cerification question Subject: RE: Cerification question Very good points. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question You people talk like you can't have both. Sure there are some paper MCSEs out there but there are also many MCSEs that have mucho experience. Most hiring managers, all things being equal will look at experience first but... then certs. Additionally while experience is the best there are people that have worked in one environment for so long that they know NOTHING about any other capabilities of the hardware/software. They are nearly as bad as the paper MSCE because the scope of their knowledge is so very limited and because of their experience think the only way to run a network is the way they did it at their last job. At least the Paper boyz know they are limited, are willing to learn, cost half as much and don't cause half the drama the experience guy does. They piss me off so much more, that and they usually have no idea as to WHY their last network was set up that way but that it is just the best way. Experience is NOT always the best qualifier either _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley
*sigh* I do miss CJ... I'll go punish myself now... New Features: Convert your limbs to tentacles Major Curse : Commit yourself to the Arkham Asylum Major Curse : Feed the Dholes Doom: Fall victim to the curse of Nephren-Ka Insanity: Glare wildly at everyone not named Paul -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:30 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: totally OT:Ed Crowley Subject: Re: totally OT:Ed Crowley I would like to see CJ return. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Etts, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:14 PM Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley Hi there I also mentioned to him that he is GREATLY missed on this newsgroup (as would anyone else be). Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley Why not join a list he does post to and ask him for clarification? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Dogs have owners, Cats have staff -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 20:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley why can he not post here? How would list mismanagement cause that? Sounds vaugue to me -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Evans Sent: May 2, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley He posts on the Yahoo Group called Exchange 2000 daily. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley Our loss. Thats for dang sure. Its not the same w/o him. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: totally OT:Ed Crowley He's alive and well. Swynk's mismanagement of this list has made it impossible for him to post as of late. - Original Message - From: Chinnery Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:32 PM Subject: totally OT:Ed Crowley Does anybody know what happened to Ed Crowley? It just hit me that I haven't seen any posts from him for a long time. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Changing GAL User display names with Q250455?
That's the std disclaimer that accompanies ADSIEdit. You'll find one for RegEdt32 and other similar utilities as well. Basically, it's MS's way of saying that this should work just fine, but there is no way for us to know what else might be going on in your environment. -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:35 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Changing GAL User display names with Q250455? Subject: Changing GAL User display names with Q250455? Hallo, I installed a new Exchange (2000) server on the weekend, and afterwards, the client requested that the GAL user names be listed in the form Lastname, Firstname. I searched Technet and found Q250455. What worries me is the final line, which states Making these changes can have adverse effects. How do I know if I will have adverse effects? What _are_ the adverse effects? The article doesn't go into further detail. Thank you, Allison _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange System Manager and WINS
Have you tried connecting to your GC with ADUC instead of just any DC? -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange System Manager and WINS Subject: RE: Exchange System Manager and WINS Nope I am on track, we have installed the tools on the workstation. Now, correct me if I am wrong, but when you install the ESM the AD Users Computers MMC will pick up the exchange tabs, at least it does on our network. And we do have matching SP's on Servers and Workstations. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Myles, Damian Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange System Manager and WINS I think you're getting your wires crossed a little. The ESM issues you talk about a la WINS are 5.5 issues, not Win2K issues. The reason why you're not getting mailbox support is that the default AD Users and Computers snap-in (on the Win2K CD) does not contain the necessary support for Exchange mailbox manipulation. When you install the Ex2K tools (ESM and AD Users/Computers snapin) from the Ex2K CD, the appropriate .MSC files for these are installed under the \Exchsrvr\Bin folder. This is why you can do it from the Exchange Server itself. Install the tools off the Exchange CD onto the local machine where you wish to manage ex2k from and you'll get the supported snapins working. Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 16:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange System Manager and WINS How are you choosing what DC or Exchange server to connect to? If you are explicitly connecting to a server, are you using the host name or the FQDN? I'm guessing that you're just using the hostname (or NetBIOS name). Try using FQDN and seeing if that fixes it. Alternately, fix the domain suffix search order on your machine to include all necessary domains -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange System Manager and WINS WIN2K SP1(navtive mode) and E2K (native mode) I know I have seen this in writing but am unable to locate it. For the ESM to function properly from a workstation, does that workstation have to point to a WINS server? From my experience, ESM will work when pointing to a WINS server and may or may not work if not. We are having a problem when trying to create mailbox enabled users, the option to create the mailbox does not appear. Even after the user is created and you go to the exchange task, the only option is to enable instant messaging, rendering the account unusable as far as mail is concerned. I know that WINS is not necessary in native mode, but I sure do remember reading that the ESM requires it. Others have told me that we might have a network browsing issue etc If anyone knows of any such literature about this please point me to it or any guidance to make it work without WINS would be great too. Thanks all! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Mail to Exchange 2000 migration
Ew What's the chance of just exporting everything to PST and then building a new E2k domain? -Original Message- From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:53 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: MS Mail to Exchange 2000 migration Subject: MS Mail to Exchange 2000 migration Greetings all, Unfortunately, the subject line does not lie. I am on a project doing an MS Mail 3.5 to Exchange 2000 migration. I am having trouble with the MS Mail Connector and wanted some suggestions on what to try next. We set up the MS Mail Connector on the E2K server, and defined the MS Mail postoffice as being serviced by the MTA. We have not done any dirsync yet but tried to send mail through Outlook by sending a one-off msg to the MS Mail type address of a user on the destination MS Mail postoffice. And then we tried sending the other direction and in both cases, no workie and no NDR's. The queues are empty so I'm left a little baffled... Does the MTA on the E2K server carry the traffic to and FROM the MS Mail PO? Or does there need to be config changes done on the MS Mail side to recognize the Exchange shadow PO? Any other suggestions I should try? I'm having trouble finding interop articles specific to MS Mail and Exchange 2000, but plenty for legacy versions of Exchange. TIA, Karen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: any news on sp3?
August -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:44 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: any news on sp3? Subject: RE: any news on sp3? July is the target date -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: any news on sp3? Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as waiting for the service pack. Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3? info? target date? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5
Unequivocally, no -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:41 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5 Subject: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5 In order for site connectors to work properly, do you need to have both servers as BDC's in NT or DC in W2K? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple mailboxes
1 user = 1 mailbox -Original Message- From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:29 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Multiple mailboxes Subject: Multiple mailboxes Hi all, I have a question concerning mailboxes in Exchange 2000. At our company we have two Exchange 2000 Servers. Both are in different location. A user has one account on each location. So you have two different users account and two different e-mail address. These accounts are on two different servers in the same domain. Let say [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] The accounts should be configured in such a way that when he logs on with any account, he should be able to read all mail in one mailbox. So the mailboxes should be identical. Also it must be configured that when he sends an email using any of these accounts, the reply address must be [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have tried lots of things, but none gave me the result I want. Anybody have a suggestion??? Regards, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Migration Microsoft Chat Coming April 30
We still have 2 hours until the conference is scheduled to start April 30 10 -11 am PST -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:29 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Migration Microsoft Chat Coming April 30 Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Migration Microsoft Chat Coming April 30 Dvaid, what happend to this chat? The site says the technet chat room is currently unavailable. When you visit http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itcommunity/chats/chatroomtn.asp it states The TechNet Chat Room is currently unavailable. We are in the middle of improving our chat client. Thank you for your patience while we reschedule chats occurring April 30 - May 10. After May 10 you will be prompted to download the new version of the chat control. Bummer! I waited till the small hours of the morning (Australia) to attend this chat?! When is it to be rescheduled and why no warining? Leo. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5
Wha?! Slow down and try again. Is there a problem? If so, then what is it and what errors are being seen? Site connectors use the MTA like everything else. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:15 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5 Subject: RE: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5 OK, great.. Riddle me this.. I just upgrade my nt4.0 server w/ex5.5 to Windows 2000 member server... Do i need to reconfigure my site connector to my sister site? It was initially setup for one-way trust. Do the site connectors use the MTA or Internet Mail connectors? -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5 Unequivocally, no -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:41 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5 Subject: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5 In order for site connectors to work properly, do you need to have both servers as BDC's in NT or DC in W2K? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: any news on sp3?
Of course Ali is a male. I've seen the previews for that movie! Oh, and it doesn't look like Spell Check for OWA will be in SP3 -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:13 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: any news on sp3? Subject: RE: any news on sp3? Wow. I really can't decide if I'm actually offended by this or not. I'll let you know after I figure out why you think Ali could ONLY be a male. (ok, I'm not really offended, and I won't be any time soon, but that was pretty tasteless, Martin) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: any news on sp3? I think it is a 'men thing'. We want the biggest car, fastest computer and the newest service packs. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Sander Van Butzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:11 AM Subject: RE: any news on sp3? Without sounding too nasty:Why do people care when it comes out? Unless you have a serious problem and than you should talk to PPS anyway climbing off my soap box. Sander -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 April 2002 09:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: any news on sp3? Rumours are that it will be released this Millenium. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:05 PM Subject: any news on sp3? Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as waiting for the service pack. Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3? info? target date? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to move mbx's between orgs
ExMerge -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:09 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: How to move mbx's between orgs Subject: How to move mbx's between orgs What tools are available to migrate mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 sp3 org to a mixed E5.5sp3/E2k org? The mixed org was originally an NT4 domain and E5.5 servers. We created a new Win2k domain and we joined the E5.5 org and installed our E2k server into this org. We are using the interorg replication utility to replicate Public folders and free busy times and are using the ADC to provide a GAL and mail routing Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum No. of User in Exchange 2000 server.
1. As many as your hardware will support 2. As large as your hardware will support -Original Message- From: Vijayakumar, T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Sunday, April 28, 2002 11:55 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Maximum No. of User in Exchange 2000 server. Subject: Maximum No. of User in Exchange 2000 server. Hi All, If anyone knows about the following pls let me know. 1.Maximum No of User in Exchange 2000 server. 2.Maximum user Mail box Size. Regards Vijay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to move mbx's between orgs
Only if GrapeJam stains fit in a PST -Original Message- From: Andrew Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:13 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: How to move mbx's between orgs Subject: RE: How to move mbx's between orgs ExMerge... does that get out grapejam stains? -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to move mbx's between orgs ExMerge -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:09 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: How to move mbx's between orgs Subject: How to move mbx's between orgs What tools are available to migrate mailboxes from an Exchange 5.5 sp3 org to a mixed E5.5sp3/E2k org? The mixed org was originally an NT4 domain and E5.5 servers. We created a new Win2k domain and we joined the E5.5 org and installed our E2k server into this org. We are using the interorg replication utility to replicate Public folders and free busy times and are using the ADC to provide a GAL and mail routing Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2?
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/ms02-018.asp -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 25, 2002 9:16 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? Subject: RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? Stephen, SRP2? Any reference/url to this? Searched Technet online Thanks to all who added comments to this thread so far. Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding second domain to GAL on 5.5
Think secondary proxy address -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:56 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Adding second domain to GAL on 5.5 Subject: RE: Adding second domain to GAL on 5.5 Section 3.21 here: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm Neil -Original Message- From: Duebner, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 25 April 2002 13:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Adding second domain to GAL on 5.5 Subject: RE: Adding second domain to GAL on 5.5 Sorry its still Exchange 5.5 - should have added that the first time around. -Original Message- From: Duebner, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Adding second domain to GAL Hi, How can I add a second domain name to every user on my exchange server? I would hate to touch every single mailbox to do that. Many thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding second domain to GAL
And don't forget to add it as inbound to your IMC -Original Message- From: Duebner, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:51 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Adding second domain to GAL Subject: Adding second domain to GAL Hi, How can I add a second domain name to every user on my exchange server? I would hate to touch every single mailbox to do that. Many thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
And no car manufacturer has made a car yet that will not crash -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:19 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Well, Microsoft has not designed a fix yet that will cure all the problems. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Rebooting servers periodically is not a solution; it is just burying your head in the sand and pretending everything is fine. If that is acceptable/expected quality of service in your environment, then I guess it's ok. Serdar Soysal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
I am amazed daily at the number of people who blame Exchange when they are having DNS issues -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:52 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Awaiting Directory Lookup this would indicate that you have dsaccess problems, which would also start to explain the OWA logon issues. So, IMHO, I think you should look at the communication between your exchange servers and your DC\GC servers. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 April 2002 19:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server As far as I can see, nothing is wrong. The server ran fine for months without any restarts or reboots before SP2. We went with SP2 because of better OWA features and better SMTP queue management. Before SP2 we used to get messages stuck in the Awaiting Directory Lookup queue and there was no way to get rid of them. Those pesky messages eventually ate all the memory. We had to stop the SMTP virtual server and create a new SMTP virtual server. After SP2, we can simply remove those messages from this queue. But a few days after installing SP2, we ran into the OWA problem: When OWA gives up, there are no warnings or errors in the event log, CPU or memory utilization do not change. Everything looks the same, but OWA does not like people's passwords anymore. Although this could have something to do with Kerberos tickets expiring (or not expiring) on time... -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server What else is wrong with your systems to warrant this ?? I have systems that have been running for months on SP2 with no issues. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 April 2002 19:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Hey since Exchange SP2 I have had to stop and start all my Exchange and IIS services EVERY NIGHT. If I don't, the following day OWA stops accepting users' passwords in the middle of a production day. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Update IE w/out reboot (was: scheduling automatic rebooting...)
I clicked Tool - Windows Update and then chose IE6 No prompt No reboot -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Update IE w/out reboot (was: scheduling automatic rebooting...) Subject: Update IE w/out reboot (was: scheduling automatic rebooting...) On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, at 6:08pm, Stephen Mynhier wrote: Oh my God... That is absolutely amazing! I managed to upgrade IE on my Win 2k Adv Server today without rebooting it! I have accomplished the impossible! We need a committee to study this! (get your facts straight) I would be happy to (get my facts straight, that is). How do you do this? It always prompts me to reboot, and does even give me the option to reboot later. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, | entity or | organization. All information is provided without | warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2?
This list does not include SRP2, which should be applied to all IIS servers. -Original Message- From: Steve Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:55 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? Subject: RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/BestConfig.as p Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? William, thanks for your reply but what I am looking for is a list of post Exchange SP2 patches that may need applying regardless of whether we are seeing any errors. For example security patches that plug holes that we may have and don't know about etc. Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe memory usage
It is designed to not release the resources unless something else needs it. See also Dynamic Buffer Allocation (DBA) -Original Message- From: The Geek Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:05 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Store.exe memory usage Subject: RE: Store.exe memory usage I don't know if that is the cause of my problem. But when the memory utilization is near or above 700MB some users continue to get the requesting data from Microsoft Exchange server that is so much fun in OLK2002. But when I reboot the system and memory utilization comeback up it's at about 350MB and there is no more latency. - John Q From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Store.exe memory usage Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:26:09 -0400 Is that a problem? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage I have noticed that when store.exe uses a lot of memory, such as during a mailbox import, it never releases the memory with E2K SP2. Has anyone else noticed this? - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:08 PM Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage It uses the amount it needs. - Original Message - From: Peter Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 6:27 PM Subject: Store.exe memmory usage Hi all, I just installed a new EX5.5 server and the store.exe will NOT use all available memmory. :-( Config: IBM box with 3 CPU, 3GB RAM, RAID1 for c:\, (os) RAID1 for d:\(swap), RAID1 for e:\ (logs) and RAID5 for f:\ (db). More than 1000 users. I have the /3GB switch in boot.ini. Store.exe uses only about 900MB and I have almost 2GB of RAM fee. I have two more similar boxes and the store.exe will grab more than 2GB of RAM. Any ideas? TIA /Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. === === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding another domain in Exchange 5.5
If this server is hosting the mail for water.com then set it to inbound -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:46 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: adding another domain in Exchange 5.5 Subject: adding another domain in Exchange 5.5 Just wanted to make sure I was right in my thinking and the FAQ 3.23 appears to verify that. I need to add another email domain to the exchange box (5.5 sp4) The new domain lets say is called water.com. I have an MX record pointing to our exchange box. Our current (Primary) domain is rsd-tc.com. Under sent to water.com under route to rsd-tc.com The FAQ seems to be written with sub domains in mind but this is not hierarchical, this will still work just fine - right? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any reason to upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000?
Sounds like a good fit for SBS2k or SBS.NET to me -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:02 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Any reason to upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000? Subject: Any reason to upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000? I asked this question a while back - just after Exchange 2000 came out. Is there any really good reason to upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000? We use it (20 users) and have two small remote sites that replicate with ours. Yes, we also use Active Directory. PRIV.EDB is 2.6 GB and PUB.EDB is 84 MB and it all runs on an NT2000 Server with 512 MB of RAM. Thanks for the help and/or any comments y'all might provide, Arch Willingham Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone number have changed however we have not moved. T. U. Parks Construction Company P.O. Box 3308 Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308 Phone:423-648-3800 If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple Public folder hierarchy
Sounds like you really don't have a good reason to go with non-MAPI PF trees -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:23 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Multiple Public folder hierarchy Subject: Re: Multiple Public folder hierarchy Here is what we are trying to acomplish Matt. Three locations 1 Exchange server in each: Routing group A/Server A/Public Folder tree Routing Group B/Server B/Public Folder tree Routing Group C/Server C/Public Folder tree From documents I have read it states that with multiple public top level folders MAPI users can only see one top level hierarchy. What I want to do - I wanted to create public folder tree in each routing group that relates to the business activities of each routing group. For eample, Routing group A/Engineering folder Routing group B/RD folder Routing group C/Advertising folder I want to then replicate some of the subfolders of these to all routing groups but how would this be viewed by the MAPI clients if they can only see one top level folder? I was going to create these as new top level folders but then read about the limitation for MAPI clients. So I thought that if I created these under the default Public folder for the relevant routing group this would overcome the limitation. Do I need to do this, will this work? I think I am missing a fundamental piece of information on how this works and the users see. Any help/reference would be appreciated. Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Store.exe memmory usage
In Exchange Server 5.5, dynamic buffer allocation allows the buffer cache to grow or shrink, depending on how much memory is available and on what resources are in use by other services that are running on the Microsoft Windows NT Server computer. If other services are not using memory, the Exchange Server database engine takes up as much memory as it needs. If other services need memory, the database engine gives up some memory by transferring pages to the hard disk and shrinking the size of the buffer. (From Q271987) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:00 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Store.exe memmory usage Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage Serdar, Tell that to my box :-(It has 1.5 GB free and it doesn't want to take it, not even after I moved to it 500 mailboxes. I ran the perf optimizer again last night and I was able to convince store.exe to use 400 MB more. /Peter - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: RE: Store.exe memmory usage Exchange: Oooh! There's some free memory. Hey, I'll take it. I'll take it all! Mine mine mine! Other App: But, I need some free memory too! And you took it all! Exchange: All right. Here you go. Give it back when you're done, though! Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage I have noticed that when store.exe uses a lot of memory, such as during a mailbox import, it never releases the memory with E2K SP2. Has anyone else noticed this? - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:08 PM Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage It uses the amount it needs. - Original Message - From: Peter Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 6:27 PM Subject: Store.exe memmory usage Hi all, I just installed a new EX5.5 server and the store.exe will NOT use all available memmory. :-( Config: IBM box with 3 CPU, 3GB RAM, RAID1 for c:\, (os) RAID1 for d:\(swap), RAID1 for e:\ (logs) and RAID5 for f:\ (db). More than 1000 users. I have the /3GB switch in boot.ini. Store.exe uses only about 900MB and I have almost 2GB of RAM fee. I have two more similar boxes and the store.exe will grab more than 2GB of RAM. Any ideas? TIA /Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
E2k has the event service for backwards compatability... Just like the MTA stacks and the SRS... -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k Subject: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k I finally got around to doing my production upgrade to Exchange 2000 this weekend. Most everything looks good, except none of my AutoAccept (ExchangeCode/Strong v4) event scripts are working. These worked after I performed the Exchange 2000 upgrade in my lab environment (which was based on restored data from my production environment). Anyway, I've checked all the permissions I can (on EVENTCONFIG_server and the mailboxes themselves), and everything looks right. I've deleted and re-installed the scripts manually. Still no dice. The error message I'm gettting is at the bottom of this message. I've looked up everything I could think of in the KnowledgeBase, but very little is there for Ex2000 with regards to the event service. The only hit applies to Exchange 5.5. It specifically mentions duplicate aliases as the source of the error, but a search through AD (and using the client) reveals no such duplicates. I'm pretty well stumped. The error code 0x80040111 is a MAPI logon failure code. I thought perhaps the event service was running with insufficient privliges. However, it runs as LocalSystem, which should give it all the rights it needs. Any Ideas? Thanks for your help. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeES Event Category: General Event ID: 11 Date: 4/23/2002 Time: 1:03:59 PM User: N/A Computer: MAIL Description: A fatal error (0x80040111) occurred in an IExchangeEventSink while processing message [Subject = test5]. Regards, :::Ryan Malayter :::Network Engineer :::Bank Administration Institute :::Chicago, Illinois, USA :::PGP Key: http://www.malayter.com/pgp-public.txt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: unable to join exsisting sit
[09:41:42] CComBOIFacesFactory::QueryInterface (K:\admin\src\udog\BO\bofactory.cxx:52) Error code 0X80004002 (16386): No interface. Has shown up in every E2k installation log that I have seen. This can be safely ignored. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:32 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: unable to join exsisting sit Subject: Re: unable to join exsisting sit Jojo, regarding this error No interface I am also getting this when trying to double click on the properties of the public folders in my exchange 2000 org. I believe it is something to do with the account of the machine not being validated or having access to one of the root DC roles. Now regarding joining your exchange 5.5 site, I have a question. We have two nt4 domains with a different exchange org in each. We have setup a Windows 2000 forest (one root domain and one child domain). I have setup a one way trust between the root Win2k domain and one of the NT4 domains where the NT4 domain trusts the Win2k root domain. In the root domain under the domain admin account I run setup /forestprep and then select join an existing exchange 5.5 organisation. I type in the computer name of the exchange 5.5 server in the NT4 domain I have the two way trust with. I then get the following error. Setup encountered an error while attempting to bind to the Exchange server Server10 0XC103FC93 (64659): Could not bind to the Microsoft Exchange Directory Server Server10. You do not have the permissions required to complete the operation. The error in the exchange servers setup progress.log shows this [17:43:41] Entering CDapi::ScGetSiteInfo [17:43:41] Could not bind to the Microsoft Exchange Directory server server10. You do not have the permissions required to complete the operation. [17:43:41] CDapi::ScGetSiteInfo (K:\admin\src\libs\exsetup\dapiaccess.cxx:232) Error code 0XC103FC93 (64659): Could not bind to the Microsoft Exchange Directory server server10. You do not have the permissions required to complete the operation. Is this just a case of having to make the domain administrator in the Win2k domain a member of the domain administrators group in the NT4 domain? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
He doesn't have much on his social calendars for Sundays -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:21 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server But why are the reboots required? -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server If you are into Perl, I've got a script that I use to reboot our MSX55 servers (monthly for mailbox servers, twice monthly for IMS, weekly for OWA). It could undoubtedly be tweaked for what you want. It shuts down the MSX services before the reboot (and verifies that they do indeed stop). After the reboot is complete, it verifies that any service running at the time of reboot is running after the reboot. Sends email showing the results. -Original Message- From: James Cornett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Does anyone know how to schedule the automatic rebooting of Windows 2000 Servers. I have looked on the their website and have found next to nothing about how to do this. What I am trying to do is on our Mail server I want to have the machine reboot say every Sunday night at a certain time. If anyone knows how to do this in Windows 2000 I would greatly appreciate the information. _ James Cornett Network Administrator New Israel Fund 1101 14th Street, NW Sixth Floor Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-842-0900 ext. 269 Fax: 202-842-0991 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.newisraelfund.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Log Files folder
I don't think that we can really conclusively dismiss that possibility -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:43 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Log Files folder Subject: RE: Log Files folder Ok good, then I'm not crazy. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Log Files folder There's a 'tracking.log' share on each 5.5 server, but I've not heard of 'Log Files' Neil -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 April 2002 14:37 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Log Files folder Subject: Log Files folder Ok, I think I may have a security problem. This may sound stupid Isn't there suppose to be a default share called 'Log Files' on Exchange 5.5? I could have sworn there was cause I was writing performance log data to that directory and now it appears to be gone on all of my servers. Just want to verify. Thx e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
Then run SendMail -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:22 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Funny thing is I never have this problem on any of the software I run on my Linux box. In fact there hasn't been the need to reboot it in over 1 year 4 months -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Hm I'm guessing leaky memory in third party aps -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:24 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Due to MS wonder memory management in Win2K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server But why are the reboots required? -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server If you are into Perl, I've got a script that I use to reboot our MSX55 servers (monthly for mailbox servers, twice monthly for IMS, weekly for OWA). It could undoubtedly be tweaked for what you want. It shuts down the MSX services before the reboot (and verifies that they do indeed stop). After the reboot is complete, it verifies that any service running at the time of reboot is running after the reboot. Sends email showing the results. -Original Message- From: James Cornett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Does anyone know how to schedule the automatic rebooting of Windows 2000 Servers. I have looked on the their website and have found next to nothing about how to do this. What I am trying to do is on our Mail server I want to have the machine reboot say every Sunday night at a certain time. If anyone knows how to do this in Windows 2000 I would greatly appreciate the information. _ James Cornett Network Administrator New Israel Fund 1101 14th Street, NW Sixth Floor Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-842-0900 ext. 269 Fax: 202-842-0991 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.newisraelfund.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
Exchange 5.5 has NEVER blue screened a box -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:05 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server You mean like BSOD..? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Which still doesn't do half what Exchange does. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Ah sendmail sucks. No public folders. If I was to run a mail server on Linux it would be qmail -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Then run SendMail -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:22 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Funny thing is I never have this problem on any of the software I run on my Linux box. In fact there hasn't been the need to reboot it in over 1 year 4 months -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Hm I'm guessing leaky memory in third party aps -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:24 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Due to MS wonder memory management in Win2K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server But why are the reboots required? -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server If you are into Perl, I've got a script that I use to reboot our MSX55 servers (monthly for mailbox servers, twice monthly for IMS, weekly for OWA). It could undoubtedly be tweaked for what you want. It shuts down the MSX services before the reboot (and verifies that they do indeed stop). After the reboot is complete, it verifies that any service running at the time of reboot is running after the reboot. Sends email showing the results. -Original Message- From: James Cornett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Does anyone know how to schedule the automatic rebooting of Windows 2000 Servers. I have looked on the their website and have found next to nothing about how to do this. What I am trying to do is on our Mail server I want to have the machine reboot say every Sunday night at a certain time. If anyone knows how to do this in Windows 2000 I would greatly appreciate the information. _ James Cornett Network Administrator New Israel Fund 1101 14th Street, NW Sixth Floor Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-842-0900 ext. 269 Fax: 202-842-0991 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.newisraelfund.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
Oh my God... That is absolutely amazing! I managed to upgrade IE on my Win 2k Adv Server today without rebooting it! I have accomplished the impossible! We need a committee to study this! (get your facts straight) -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:29 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, at 12:42pm, Roger Seielstad wrote: ... not to mention that you're running Redhat 7.2, which hasn't been available for 16 months ... You can upgrade the OS (sans the kernel) without rebooting Linux. (You cannot even upgrade the *web browser* without rebooting Windows.) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, | entity or | organization. All information is provided without | warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2?
M$? Why would a million dollars include information about Exchange? -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:50 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? Subject: RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? Actually I have a database record for all my Windows Servers with their security ( operating system SP and HF) and applications status. I'll be populating the database with info from the Exchange servers as soon as I can. I was just confused, because he said run change control and I thought he was talking about running some software. It would be great if M$ started including info about exchange on hfnetchk. Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +351 967819600 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: quarta-feira, 24 de Abril de 2002 23:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? Your English is fine; one heck of a lot better than my Portuguese. Okay, if you want to find out what SP your Exchange 2000 server is running, you can just right-click on the server in ESM and choose properties. Then to see any additional hotfixes that are installed on top of it, just go to start settings control panel add/remove programs. They'll be listed in there. I'm assuming Win2k/E2k since that's the title of this thread. Also, I think Daniel had a valid concern - keep on top of change management. Perhaps you could have just said, Sure, I'd like to, but the idiot that was here before me didn't, and I need to get up to speed on the mess I inherited :) -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:05 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? Subject: RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? I really don't understand you guys... WTF is going on? I now guess that when Daniel was talking about run change control he meant to record everything I install on the servers or something. I appologise to you elite gurus for my ignorance, and not speaking English very fluently, but I'm new to exchange and all I wanted to know is if there is some tool like hfnetchk to automatically tell me the SP and hotfixes that are installed on Exchange servers. BTW, I'm just taking over a lot of exchange servers that weren't installed by me, and have no record of what was installed on them! Thanks for nothing! Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +351 967819600 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
And I think that it is fairly safe to say that you won't really get any love by coming on a list designed for a specific Microsoft product and bad-mouthing both the product and the company. Every technology has an exploit. Whether it's an OS or a server application, there are weaknesses and exploits. And if you want to talk about charging for software, then someone please tell me where I can download a free copy of SuseMail, because I am curious to play with it! -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 6:33 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: Re: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Linux already has one. It's called 'alt.destroy.microsoft' - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 6:11 PM Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server One of these days, someone's going to start a newsgroup or discussion list geared towards advocacy of one NOS over others. There seems to be a demand for it. Maybe usenet, somewhere in the comp.os.*.advocacy hierarchy... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Accounts
They certainly do have service account rights. There is no other way for it to work Check your group memberships in the domain -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:51 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Email Accounts Subject: Re: Email Accounts we are using exchange5.5., and they do not have service account rights and yes they can read everyones email, and they don't have user rights to other peoples mailbox. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Going Native for W2K
Don't use a product like Upromote in a production environment. Upgrade or rebuild. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:27 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Going Native for W2K Subject: Going Native for W2K My exchange server is also a BDC and is the only one left in my W2K environment. It is keeping me from going to native mode. Anyone ever use a product called UPROMOTE to un-promote a bdc to a member server? This is the 1st server in my exchange site, so I can just replace it - guess I could upgrade it to Windows 2000 with Ex.5.5. and not make it a DC... Any suggestions? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Accounts
U... I expect his friend to be FreshPrice11 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:20 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Email Accounts Subject: RE: Email Accounts What do you expect from someone who posts to a technical forum as Jazzy11 Daniel?? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Accounts Now, if I may... When this was first suggested as the only likely possibility you said it couldn't be right. Something I learned a long time ago: if I'm asking questions I'm not in the right place to be questioning the answers. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:19 AM Subject: Re: Email Accounts Hi Well you was right , they did have site dervice permissions, come to find out some one has changed the rights a week ago, and used an administrative account and we found out who the administrator wa. Thank everyone for your feedback. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Going Native for W2K
Bah! Install another (member) server as Win2k and then migrate to E2k Then remove the old E5.5 server Not as easy as it sounds, but probably your best route given what you are describing I'll never do an inplace upgrade to E2k unless I have no other option And I will always have another option. Learn that NetDiag and DCDiag are your best friends Then read the Win2k DNS white paper up and down -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:26 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Going Native for W2K Subject: RE: Going Native for W2K Actually running in a windows 2000 environment - all my other servers have been upgrade and this is the only server keeping me from going to Native mode. Since, I need to be in native mode to ensure that the permissions, DL's and public folders are OK when I add my exchange 2000 server. Ron -Original Message- From: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Going Native for W2K Like Stephen said, I wouldn't go the UPROMOTE route. Instead, build a windows 2000 member server in the NT 4 domain and install Exchange 5.5 , make it the second server in the site. Use the Ed Crowley move server method and then follow the steps to remove the first server from the site. Matt - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:26 AM Subject: Going Native for W2K My exchange server is also a BDC and is the only one left in my W2K environment. It is keeping me from going to native mode. Anyone ever use a product called UPROMOTE to un-promote a bdc to a member server? This is the 1st server in my exchange site, so I can just replace it - guess I could upgrade it to Windows 2000 with Ex.5.5. and not make it a DC... Any suggestions? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT idx
Oh, everyone knows that you use WinZip to do that! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:23 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OT idx Subject: RE: OT idx Oh my. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT idx the pagefile.sys is about 550 MB, is there a way to make that smaller? -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 April, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT idx They're for querying the MS index server. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT idx Hi there what is a .idx and .ldx file? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mixed Sites
Are both of these in the same domain? How many domain controllers do you have? That information is stored in the active directory, and it is possible that replication has not occurred b/t your DCs. Have you tried NetDiag and DCDiag to ensure that everything there looks clean? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, April 19, 2002 7:19 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Mixed Sites Subject: Mixed Sites I installed an exchange2k server in a remote office. It joined the org fine and can seeall other servers in the org, but when I connect to my first exchange2k server It doesn't show the other server I just installed. My first site is mixed and the one I just created is straight exch2k. What do I need to get my first site to see the new one? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mixed Sites
Where are you failing to see this new server? Is it when connected to a client that is accessing the E2k server? That particular article addresses the inability of users on the E5.5 server to see users on the E2k server. This is a problem with the ADC or the SRS. This problem would not be seen on the E2k server unless you were connecting to the SRS on the E2k server with the E5.5 admin program. If your first E2k server is failing to see the new E2k server in any other place, it would be a problem with AD replication. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:58 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Mixed Sites Subject: RE: Mixed Sites Thanks Chris. Is this saying I should remove my 5.5 server as the exchange server in my CA and point it to my exch2k server in the mixed site? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mixed Sites Does Q291170 help? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mixed Sites I installed an exchange2k server in a remote office. It joined the org fine and can seeall other servers in the org, but when I connect to my first exchange2k server It doesn't show the other server I just installed. My first site is mixed and the one I just created is straight exch2k. What do I need to get my first site to see the new one? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Which server in E2k typically performs this role?
GC -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:50 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Which server in E2k typically performs this role? Subject: Which server in E2k typically performs this role? Which server in E2k is listed as being responsible for the Default Offline Address list? Is it a specific FSMO server at the root of the domain? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Question
Generally that delay is in regards to permissions. Can you access the mailbox with a MAPI client or is the problem isolated to OWA? -Original Message- From: Romeo, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 18, 2002 12:52 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA Question Subject: RE: OWA Question The delay, accourding to a Microsoft Tech I spoke with, can be up to 2 hours. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Question Thanks, Andy. It's strange...all the existing users can access OWA without a problem. Only new accounts can't. I've reviewed everything in the q article(s) but no help. I'm stumped. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Question Q173470 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Question NT4 domain, Exchange 5.5 I've just created a new user and new mailbox for that user within the last 15 minutes. In OWA, however, I get the message OWA was unable get to your inbox. Is this because I need to wait and if so, why the delay? TIA. Bill Lambert Network Consultant Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Question
I don't think that I've ever heard the phrase over ambitious and CA inoculatit engine used in the same sentence -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:37 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Virus Question Subject: RE: Virus Question Look what just hit the SQL2K list My appologies to these lists for my virus scanner spammimng all of you. Mr Pink is an innocent victim of an over ambitious CA inoculatit engine and an equally over ambitious notification policy. if you wish to express your opinion of the incident to the responsible party, please send it to myself and not Nate Steven M. Kiergaard Network Engineer 830 WARF University of Wisconsin - Madison Facilities Planning Management e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 608 263-4442 Cell 225-3004 HelpDesk 265-6900 Fax 262-6801 Web Page http://www.fpm.wisc.edu The past resembles the future like water resembles water -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question Our VP of Development is name Jerry. So we all the programmers Jerry's Kids -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question Is my name ed again?? --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question You are special. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question Thanks I got it.. Feel very special now.. --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question On the way... -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question I am still waiting --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question You can have some of mine -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question I want one too.. I feel left out... --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question I got four this morning. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question You only got one? I got 20 all telling me I had sent them different virus's. They have a fsked up Antigen setup or something. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Question This morning I received the following e-mail: -Original Message- From: ANTIGEN_PELLIG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:55 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Antigen Notification:Antigen found VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus Antigen for Exchange found Body of Message infected with VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus. The file is currently Cleaned. The message, RE: SMTP message size limits, was sent from Christopher Hummert and was discovered in PINK, Nathaniel\Inbox located at FPM Netops/FPMMAIL/PELLIG. -End of Original Message- Now I've checked around and I've failed to find any information about this virus, furthermore even with our most recent updates to Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition it didn't find anything either. Does anyone thing this is something I should worry about or does anyone know what this virus is? -Chris
RE: Information store comes up with dr watson if mail address is wrong
http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch55/SP/4/NT45/EN-US/SP4_550I.E XE -Original Message- From: sabby kassim-momodu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:33 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Information store comes up with dr watson if mail address is wrong Subject: RE: Information store comes up with dr watson if mail address is wrong Sorry I actually have service pack 3 installed, I want to know how to install service pack 4. From: Setmajer, Jerzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Information store comes up with dr watson if mail address is wrong Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:58:29 -0500 Didn't you just say you already have SP4? Are you asking how to re-install it? -Original Message- From: Sabby Momodu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information store comes up with dr watson if mail address is wrong For some time Illegal character in an email address crashes my exchange server 5.5 with service pack 4. The temporary fix is to delete the email. What is a permanent fix for this. If I need to install service pack 4 what steps are required for a successful update of the service pack. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 2000 issues
SP3 is due out in about a month -Original Message- From: Romeo, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:43 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA 2000 issues Subject: OWA 2000 issues I know that this may have been covered before but I was wondering if there are any hot fixes to some of the calendaring issues that exist in OWA 2000. For example, reminder pop-ups are unable to be closed, acceptance of meetings are not entered into the calendar ...etc. I saw a few Q article that just said microsoft is aware of the problem but never saw any follow ups with fixes. Final question, is Exchange 2000 SP3 due out any time soon? Thanks. Matthew Romeo Systems Programmer/Analyst E-Mail Administrator Quinnipiac University (203) 582-8990 E-Mail mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSX5.5 and dir.edb
AuthRest will let you set a master directory... Good luck However, by the time you get this, old stuff will have probably started getting corrected by the highest USN -Original Message- From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:21 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: MSX5.5 and dir.edb Subject: MSX5.5 and dir.edb Importance: High Greetings MSX5.5/SP4 1 Exchange Organization 1 Exchnage site 3 severs One of our three servers crashed and we replaced that one with an old hard disk (2 years ago), now we noticed that the other two have current data and also old data (i am talking about GAL), the old disk we inserted has about 3000 more objects that the other two. What can we do to keep same information in all three GALS? Is there anyway to set a master DIR.edb and let the other two get updates from that one? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBDL/Auto DL population based upon directory properties (in E 2K)
The code to handle the Dynamic Distribution Lists that you want was actually partially implemented in E2k. RTM and SP1 E2k could handle DDLs, although there isn't a GUI to do it. SP2 broke the partial implementation, however, SP3 will fully implement the code to handle DDLs. (DDLs are Distribution Lists based on an LDAP query) Stephen -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:46 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: RBDL/Auto DL population based upon directory properties (in E 2K) Subject: RE: RBDL/Auto DL population based upon directory properties (in E 2K) Nothing in Exchange currently to do this natively. There is a DL management tool in the E2K resource kit, but it's not particularly RBDL like. I believe at the moment 3rd party tools are your only option. In the Web Links | Server | Directory Management section of www.mail-resources.com I believe there are at least 2 DL tools which work with E2K. -Original Message- From: Moore, David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RBDL/Auto DL population based upon directory properties (in E2K) We have been using RBDL (www.exchangecode.com and in the 5.5 RSK) to populate membership in Distribution Lists on 5.5 for some time and have been very happy with the process. Now we are moving to E2K and would like to do the same - population of E2K Mail-Enabled groups based upon a directory property (such as office code or zip code). I'm cheap so I'd like something free if possible as I am aware of tools that I can purchase to do the same. I'm ok with RAW LDAP queries and don't necessarily need a fancy UI. VBScript code would also be fine too. Anyone? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch2k IIS
How can mail continue to work and not be able to send? Do you mean that mail can be accessed but you have no internal or external mail flow? Or do you mean that internal mail works but you do not have outbound external mail? And you seem to indicate that you can still receive mail? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:49 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exch2k IIS Subject: RE: Exch2k IIS Thanks. I just found out that someone was trying to set up an anonymous ftp server on my exch2k server. I reran the updates and all that good stuff. This article has my errors, but I don't have a problem with the databases being mounted. Mail continues to work despite not being able to send. -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch2k IIS Q304166 - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 April 2002 12:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch2k IIS For some reason all my protocol services (SMTP, POP3, IMAP4, NNTP, Routing Engine) stop unexpected randomly along with IIS Admin and WWW service. Event ID: 7031 is what I get. Any idea. I have been searching for a few days now and no luck. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing a custom folder under mailbox
Set up a rule to forward the data to a public folder Give them access to the public folder -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 15, 2002 11:22 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Sharing a custom folder under mailbox Subject: Sharing a custom folder under mailbox Hi Gurus, How do I share a folder I created on my mailbox ? In other words , when someone else tries to open a folder under my mailbox they don't see this custom folder , all they see are the default ones, Please help, Thanks, Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pulling a email out of the DB?
You can train a monkey to use ExMerge in less than 5 minutes. The document that comes with it is very detailed and thorough. Although the doc contains much information that 95% of ExMerge users will never use, you can easily just look for the pictures in the document and read those 10 or so pages (around pages 30-40 IIRC) -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:47 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Pulling a email out of the DB? Subject: RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? I went with the recall, mostly cause I didn't have any exmerge experience(I'll play with that in a dev environment). Oddly enough the recall got the job done in a less then desirable fashion. It emailed everyone in the company that so and so want to recall the message and it didn't actually recall the message till each person opened the recall notice. It was kind of confusing to the users. I wish it actually had just deleted the emails and kept quiet. I'll use exmerge next time. e- -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? Aah that's right. My bad. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? Unless users had delivery set to a PST file (reason 6,397 PST=BAD). -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? The recall message crap is not guaranteed to work. The only way he can be 100% sure that it is removed is to use ExMerge with the filters and archive option in place, as was suggested by several fine individuals already. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Moore, David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? Log into the users mailbox, go to their sent items folder, open the message, ACTIONS|RECALL MESSAGE. It will recall all messages but then again they should have never sent out a message that large and the MTA's should have had a limit set on them (such as 4/8/12mb). david -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pulling a email out of the DB? Hi In a bit of frustration here, I had a new employee form our HR department decide to send out a 16 meg word document to everyone in the company. This wouldn't normally effect most of the users but it will effect our 40 or so remote users who use modems and possibly some other users who have more stuff in their mailboxes. Is there a way I can pull this email from the system in its entirety without downing the server or restarting any major services? Any help is greatly appreciated. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Unknown Error
Title: Message The -2147467259 (aka 80004005) is a MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED which, in E2k, often translate to an access denied. I saw a similiar issue before, but it was a FE/BE configuration and the problem was one of the hotfixes installed on one of the servers. Unfortunately, I can't recall right off which one was the offending patch. -Original Message-From: Steve Iadarola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:45 PMPosted To: Exchange Discussion ListConversation: OWA "Unknown Error"Subject: OWA "Unknown Error" Hello, I recently set up an E2K machine in a test environment. It is a running on Win2K Adv. Server with SP2 installed, IE 5.5 SP2 and the following hot fixes installed on the OS: Q300845_W2K_SP3_X86_EN.exeQ313450_W2K_SP3_X86_EN.exeQ313829_W2K_SP3_X86_EN.exeQ314147_W2K_SP3_X86_EN.exeq316059.exeq319182.exerbupdate.exevbs55nen.exe OnceI installed the hot fixes I installed E2k and then E2K SP2. When I connect to the OWA I am getting the following error: I click OK and everything seems fine. Every now and then it will not appear until I click the "FOLDER" button on the left to see the folder view. Once you clear the error everything appears to work OK. The only thing that I can see that does not work is after I log out of the OWA and click the "CLOSE" button to close the Browser window. A search of TechNet only came up with 10 results and I think that I have narrowed it down to one of two causes: 1) From http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechnol/office/maintain/featusability/helpofc.asp Run-Time Error Occurs When Hiding or Showing CommandBar Object in VBA Macro You attempt to hide or show a CommandBar object in a Visual Basic for Applications macro, and you see the following error message: Run-time error '-2147467259 (80004005)' Method 'Visible' of object 'CommandBar' failed This problem occurs if you attempt to hide or show a command bar to which the Visible property does not apply. Not all CommandBar items support the Visible property. The following table lists the CommandBar items known to generate the preceding error message when they are used with the Visible property. 2) From http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q209050(although the info states that it is not related to my specific problem.) This article lists the error message numbers and text that are returned from ADOFiltr.dll as a result of calling either the DesktopToDevice or DeviceToDesktop API function calls from Microsoft Visual Basic. Has anyone else seen this error or know of a work around? TIA, Steve Steve Iadarola[EMAIL PROTECTED]Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.65 Hayden AveLexington, MA 02421Voice: 781.860.8660Fax: 781.861.0566 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NewsGroups / Bulletin Boards
Public folder, SharePoint Portal server, or just go with SharePoint Team Services to do it since you probably won't need enough to justify a full blown SPP server -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:44 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: NewsGroups / Bulletin Boards Subject: NewsGroups / Bulletin Boards Exchange 5.5, NT 4.0. We would like to setup a newsgroup / bulletin board type thing for several internal users. From what I've read about Newsgroups, it looks like they are mostly for Internet use. Is anybody using Newsgroups specifically for internal users, and if so, can you specify who has access to the group and who doesn't? Would there be a better way to approach this rather than Newsgroups? All we really want is a local message board that we can restrict access to. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WORM_KLEZ.G
You refer to your virus software as him and you think that he talks to you? Now take your Magic 8-Ball and shake it up again and let's see what is tells us. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:01 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: WORM_KLEZ.G Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Thats the virus softwares job we pay him good money to do this. He told me that no one is infected. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Why you no answer my question?? Quack! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Dont you get paid to find out if anyone is infected or not? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I dont know if I anyone is infected or not we just keep receiving a ton of emails with viruses in them. -Original Message- From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I've seen that happen here too. We block the files and antigen catches it but the media player/real player does start. Nothing bad happens after that which is a good thing. Sandhya -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I'm afraid you've gone and mystified me. If you're blocking all those filetypes, how can Klez get through to open Windows Media Player? -Peter -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G how do you stop it from opening windows media player even if i am blocking scr exe pif bat vbs js and com. I am using scanmail for exchange verson 3.52 -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I've seen some klez-g messages with bat and scr attachments. Of course there may be disagreement on exactly what constitutes the G variant. -Peter -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G If I am reading this article correctly, then it will have a random extension if it is a earlier variation of KLEZ. This particular version has either .exe or a double extension. Please correct me if I'm wrong. http://www.viruslist.com/eng/viruslist.html?id=4292 Jessica -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I was under the impression that the extension is random. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Block .exe -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WORM_KLEZ.G DOES ANYONE KNOW OF THE BEST WAY TO BLOCK THIS VIRUS WORM_KLEZ.G RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
