EX55: Blocking OUTBOUND email by domain??
I need to block inbound and outbound email to a particular domain on exchange 5.5. I searched the net and only found an Exchange 2000 way to do this. For inbound I simply added that domain to the TURF settings and that works fine. For outbound the only kludge I could come up with is to set up a CONNECTION/Specify by email domain and set that domain to route through 0.0.0.0. This host is unreachable which means that the messages sit in the outbound queue and retry until they expire (as well as generating a bunch of alerts to the sender). Is there a better way to do this? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Exchange Users receiving messages not addressed to them
The messages could be sent TO: the bogus alias and have a BCC: (blind carbon copy) to his valid address. -Original Message- From: Justin Lape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Users receiving messages not addressed to them Has anybody had any problems with any of their users receiving email a bogus alias? One of my Exchange users has recently been receiving emails addressed to an alias that does not exist anywhere on our domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
Argumentum ad ignorantiam doesn't work. Pretty common (and simplistic) logical fallacy, mostly used in supporting religious dogmatism. I cannot prove that $deity doesn't exist, therefore $deity exists. from somewhere else in this godforsaken thread I must say that if you were to hire Ed Crowley for his employer's prevailing wage, for the amount of hours he spends providing free technical support in Microsoft's online communities, he has demonstrably paid for it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Posted At: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:32 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics You PROVE it. Prove to me that accepting gifts from vendors and then turning around to clients and providing information and services about and from those vendors is NOT a real or perceived conflict of interest. You prove that false. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
Nobody has ever proven that my bathtub isn't Cthulhu's summer retreat either. Therefore we must accept that my bathtub is Cthulhu's summer retreat. This is the essence of the Argumentum ad Ignorantiam fallacy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Posted At: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics To whom is it clear? Noone has EVER proven wrong that accepting direct gifts from vendors when you are in an industry that provides services to clients and customers for that vendor that it is NOT a conflict of interest. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Command line directory export of GAL container
Google search using: command line exchange 5.5 gal export Yields a lot of stuff including: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;149447 -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Command line directory export of GAL container How does one export the contents of the Global Address List container from the command line (Exchange 5.5)? I can select the Global Address List container from within Admin as the source to export to a csv file, but I want to script the process. Tim. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IFS
If you would like to disable the messenger service (for all computers) in a login script, just use this in a reg file: REGEDIT4 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Messenger] Start=dword:0004 Save that as something.reg and add this command to your login script: start /wait regedit /s \\pdc1\netlogon\something.reg (change pdc1 to the name of your login server and put the REG file in the netlogon directory) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Thanks everyone. This was a great string. Very useful. I will be disabling the messenger service on all server too. Thanks again. Samantha -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS What do you mean? Do you send popup messages as alerts? Even the Monitoring notifications from Exchange send out e-mail alerts (though one could argue the usefulness of that feature) or scripts (which require an executable to be specified). Neither one uses the Messenger service, though I suppose you could configure your script to use that. I would say that it is best to not have your Exchange server monitoring itself. Put a monitoring package on a server with the SMTP service installed and use that to send out your alerts. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS If you disable the messenger service, won't that hinder sending Alerts if you use them? Samantha -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Yes, only teasing... Sort of Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Don't pay any attention to him. He's kidding. Eric? You're kidding, right??? Eric??? Seriously though, I'd disable that service. It's part of my standard build procedures for all servers (there is no reason that you need to send popup messages to/from servers) and it does not affect anything else. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:55 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS How? -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Because you have been own3d by 31137 hax0rs. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Why is your messenger service running? You can safely disable it. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:41 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS Thanks, I was worried, because I received a number of messenger pop-ups on that server, and it is behind a firewall and no-one should be able to do that, then I bumped on to that file... Kim -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Those are temp files. They should be deleted by the store at some point during normal processing. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IFS Help, Under the folder mdbdata there is suddenly a .IFS file, can anyone tell me what it is/does, and how it got there? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IFS
Group Policy?? That would required changing to Active Directory This is for us old fashioned NT4 domain people. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Well, shoot. You can disable the Messenger service via Group Policy as well. Then, you don't have to worry about missing a server. GPO's are nifty that way :-) Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 1:46 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS If you would like to disable the messenger service (for all computers) in a login script, just use this in a reg file: REGEDIT4 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Messenger] Start=dword:0004 Save that as something.reg and add this command to your login script: start /wait regedit /s \\pdc1\netlogon\something.reg (change pdc1 to the name of your login server and put the REG file in the netlogon directory) -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Thanks everyone. This was a great string. Very useful. I will be disabling the messenger service on all server too. Thanks again. Samantha -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS What do you mean? Do you send popup messages as alerts? Even the Monitoring notifications from Exchange send out e-mail alerts (though one could argue the usefulness of that feature) or scripts (which require an executable to be specified). Neither one uses the Messenger service, though I suppose you could configure your script to use that. I would say that it is best to not have your Exchange server monitoring itself. Put a monitoring package on a server with the SMTP service installed and use that to send out your alerts. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS If you disable the messenger service, won't that hinder sending Alerts if you use them? Samantha -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Yes, only teasing... Sort of Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Don't pay any attention to him. He's kidding. Eric? You're kidding, right??? Eric??? Seriously though, I'd disable that service. It's part of my standard build procedures for all servers (there is no reason that you need to send popup messages to/from servers) and it does not affect anything else. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:55 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS How? -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Because you have been own3d by 31137 hax0rs. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Why is your messenger service running? You can safely disable it. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:41 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: IFS Subject: RE: IFS Thanks, I was worried, because I received a number of messenger pop-ups on that server, and it is behind a firewall and no-one should be able to do that, then I bumped on to that file... Kim -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 16 december 2003 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IFS Those are temp files. They should be deleted by the store at some point during normal processing. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IFS Help, Under the folder mdbdata
RE: What is SPAM - Please comment
Any email with MVP in the signature is spam. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is SPAM - Please comment More ethical discussions? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What is SPAM - Please comment Dear All I would be interested in any comments about the following ethical problem. Recently I was contacted by an acquaintance who sent me the following email. Hi I would be grateful if you could forward an email to your colleague's users about a number of telephony and Internet access packages I am involved in offering to BT users. The Broadband Offerings start at £15.99, which I believe is amongst the cheapest around. Tiscali that I know you have good experiences of supplies the packages. They would all save your users money and some of them are free. If you want to you could join up as an associate and make money as well. The users can find out more info by visiting www.telco-store.com Thanks for your assistance. . My question to you is whether if I were to send out a mail to my colleagues would you consider this Spam. I do believe that this is a good offering from a reputable company which would save my users money but it could fall under the category of unsolicited email. However so is a global email to my users warning them of Spam from Nigeria for example or warning them that somebody has left their car headlights on in the works carpark !! Do you consider this different to producing a paper notice about this offering and sticking it on the works notice board. I welcome your comments -- http://www.fastmail.fm - I mean, what is it about a decent email service? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sources of outages
There is no secret cabal!!! -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages What percentages is due to covert action by unethical MVPs with secret agendas ? -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages Apathy - 75% -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages Poor Admin Practices : 90% -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Sources of outages Regarding general sources of corporate computing outages, these figures seem to be accurate. Agree? Communication lines and services 80 percent Servers 14 percent Routers and switches 1 percent Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sources of outages
I'll tell you what! That has to be Dale, the exterminator from King of the Hill. Keep your $ -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages No, but it might be a government conspiracy. That's what my friend Rusty Shackleford thinks, anyways. (Note: $5 USD to the person that can name the TV show and character that said that line) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages There is no secret cabal!!! -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages What percentages is due to covert action by unethical MVPs with secret agendas ? -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages Apathy - 75% -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sources of outages Poor Admin Practices : 90% -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Sources of outages Regarding general sources of corporate computing outages, these figures seem to be accurate. Agree? Communication lines and services 80 percent Servers 14 percent Routers and switches 1 percent Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Race between client rules and BES server
That is exactly what I was looking for. We are running BES 2.1 now but I am ready to switch over to 3.x very soon. I have already switched all my rules back to the server because I was being flooded with Blackberry messaages where it saw them before the rule kicked in. Does anyone have any experience in how many seconds delay is enough? Tom -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server However, if you absolutely must persist with this bloody stupid way of doing things, here's a reghack for the server that'll do what you need it to do. It was originally pointed to me by the below Mr. Webb's lovely wife... :) Oh, the text below says HKLM. Put it in HKCU as well, same tree path. QUOTE: Just a tip I learned that I thought I would pass along to the rest of you on how to make the Blackberry work better if you use a spam filter or Outlook rules. I get about 200-250 spam emails per day so I use a spam filter (I Hate Spam, which does work well and I have no association with that company) and also use Outlook rules to move certain emails to various folders so, while my Outlook Inbox was relatively clean, my Blackberry was getting very hard to use due to the shear number of messages on it. I personally found the filters in the Desktop Manager were useless for me but the following registry hack allows both my spam filter and Outlook rules to do their job before the Blackberry server ever process anything, thereby resulting in a very manageable handheld. I am using the Exchange Enterprise v2.1 server but I was told this reg hack should work for all versions. I'm not sure how you'd do it on a desktop redirector but there's probably a way. Go to regedit and go to: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Research in Motion\BlackBerry\Server add a DWORD value called ProcessMailDelay (without the quotes) The decimal value you set here will be the delay, in seconds, that the server waits before looking at a user's Inbox to begin routing to the handheld Stop/Restart the Blackberry Server service Hope this helps someone out there. :ENDQUOTE Gary -- Gary K. Slinger CP Ships - Global Manager, Windows Systems Tampa, Florida Office: +1-813-209-2320 -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server 1. making the evidence 10 times more expensive for someone to discover /kidding These things always seem to come from legal. But what's worse? Having one set of Exchange backup tapes subpoenaed or 5000 PC hard drives? It's interesting to see how the timeframe has changed over the years. It seems like in the past everyone was trying to delete everything after 30 days, and now it's 60 days. This is an example of people not understanding what an information economy is. A very sad example I suppose. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server Give me one business (I was going to say good, but that's not possible) reason for this, and I'll give you ten times that many technical reason why the PST solution is a bad one. I hope you went down kicking and screaming on this one. I for one would also be polishing up my resume and kicking down some doors as well. This is only going to get ugly for you from this point out. Good Luck.. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server They are still good for the calendar and contacts, which are exempt from the 60 day limit. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server You might as well retire all your Exchange servers and replace them with something cheaper. Woohoo! Save some money, maybe they will give it back to you as a bonus! Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Race between client rules and BES server Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives
RE: Race between client rules and BES server
PST = my only choice -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server PST = bad. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Race between client rules and BES server Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives, it briefly appears in the inbox before my PC has a chance to grab it and move it to a local PST. This means that some of the time the BES server sees it and forwards it to my blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these before the server deletes them. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Race between client rules and BES server
They are still good for the calendar and contacts, which are exempt from the 60 day limit. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server You might as well retire all your Exchange servers and replace them with something cheaper. Woohoo! Save some money, maybe they will give it back to you as a bonus! Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Race between client rules and BES server Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives, it briefly appears in the inbox before my PC has a chance to grab it and move it to a local PST. This means that some of the time the BES server sees it and forwards it to my blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these before the server deletes them. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
IMAP is fine if you don't care about contacts, calendar or tasks. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell announced that now THEY got their hands on Ximian, right? 'cause Ximian has been out and around for a while. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO= FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Race between client rules and BES server
Due to new corporate policy, I just moved all my mail from the server (Exchange 5.5sp4) to local PST files. I had several rules to move mailing lists emails to server folders that now point to local PST folders. Before, these mailing list messages never showed up in the inbox, and the Blackberry server (BES server) never saw them (and thus never sent them to my blackberry). Now when one of these emails arrives, it briefly appears in the inbox before my PC has a chance to grab it and move it to a local PST. This means that some of the time the BES server sees it and forwards it to my blackberry. Does anyone know of any tricks to avoid this? I may have to switch these back to the server as I can keep stuff there less than 60 days old but this means that I would need to have to manually archive these before the server deletes them. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
Last I checked the Ximian connector did not work on Exchange 5.5 (it requires exchange 2000 or newer). -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Well... Ximian with the exchange connector has the advantage of being able to view/edit the calendar, tasks, etc... it's very similar in appearance to outlook. Quite a few of our Linux people use it. (it's really going through OWA to get to the additional folders (calendar, tasks)). Seems to work quit well here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell announced that now THEY got their hands on Ximian, right? 'cause Ximian has been out and around for a while. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO= FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5
If you use caching mode with outlook 2003 and exchange 5.5, then your cache is limited to 2gig (it cannot use the new enhanced unicode PST format. This means that if you have anywhere close to 2gig in your server mailbox it will not work (it will fill up the 2gig of an old style PST then give you an error). The only workaround is to stop using cache mode or trim your server storage to much less than 2g (like 1.5gig or less as the PST format is much less efficient than PSTs) Tom -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 No. You can use cache mode with any flavor of Exchange. I believe E2K3 is optimized for it, but it works with any flavor. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 So what is the correct answer? To use caching mode do you have to be using both Outlook 2003 AND Exchange 2003?? -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Right. All mcary was saying is that he thought you HAD to be using Outlook 2003 with Exchange 2003 in order to use cached mode. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Camara, David Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 I think what he meant was that he likes the caching mode. Not necessarily using outlook 2003 with exchange 2003. Jose David P. Camara II IT-NT Administration Credit Lyonnais (212)2613868 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Are you using Cached mode with Exchange 5.5? I was under the impression that you had to running both Outlook 2003 and Exchange 2003 for Cached mode to work. -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 This is being sent from Outlook 2003 through a 5.5 server also. It works fine. Cached mode is cool too. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 I am using 2003 on XP to 5.5 right now and it works fine. -Original Message- From: Will [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Outlook 2003 on Windows 2000 works fine on Exchange v5.5 (I'm using it right now!). Yes, same here. Also, Outlook 2002 on Windows XP works great for me. It's just the combination of XP and Outlook 2003 that is causing me troubles. The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Credit Lyonnais This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging to Credit Lyonnais and is intended solely for the addressees. The unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. Credit Lyonnais shall not be liable for this e-mail if modified or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender of the wrong delivery and the mail deletion. Credit Lyonnais in the Americas: Credit Lyonnais Bank New York Branch, Credit Lyonnais Americas Services Inc., Credit Lyonnais Rouse (USA
RE: exmerge? 5.5
Or export them to a pst? (Being careful to not get anywhere near the 2g pst limit). -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge? 5.5 Not to my knowledge. You have to manually copy the PF's to a PST from within Outlook. That is always how we have done it during our migrations. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 7:51 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: exmerge? 5.5 Subject: exmerge? 5.5 Is there a utility like exmerge that can export out the public folders. They have a ton of email with attachments and I would love to able to export out intact just in case. _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Manager
I am running Mailbox Manager right now in audit mode and I am seeing this problem intermittantly. If you turn on attach detailed log file and look at the CSV file, I see that it is skipping all mailboxes when this happens. Not sure what the problem is. I stopped and restarted the mailbox manager service and I think that gets it to work again at least once. I am running exchange 5.5sp4 on win2k sp4 here. Tom -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Manager Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager? I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test box. Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics: Inbox: 3 Days Sent Items: 3 Days Deleted Items: 3 Days Other Folders: 5 Days The mailboxes on this server were imported onto it using Exmerge last Thursday When the process runs, whether scheduled or after choosing clean now I get this: Event ID: 727 Started processing mailboxes at the scheduled time of 09/15/03 09:54:50. Event ID: 728 The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Completed at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB. I know there are messages in these mailboxes older than 3 days Any ideas on if I'm missing something? Current config Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange Server 5.5 Sp4 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Manager
I have been searching Google for a solution and so far have found many people with this problem, but no solutions. One person said that restarting the mailbox manager service fixes it temporarily. I thought this too as this got it to work once for me, but I just tried it again (restarting the service) and still it will not process any mailboxes (although it has several times). I am running exchange 5.5sp4 on win2k sp4 and have the mailbox manager from the sp4 download. I see in the knowledge base that there is a newer mailbox manager (post-sp4) but they do not mention this problem and it is not available for download (you must call PSS and beg for it). Tom -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Manager Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager? I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test box. Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics: Inbox: 3 Days Sent Items: 3 Days Deleted Items: 3 Days Other Folders: 5 Days The mailboxes on this server were imported onto it using Exmerge last Thursday When the process runs, whether scheduled or after choosing clean now I get this: Event ID: 727 Started processing mailboxes at the scheduled time of 09/15/03 09:54:50. Event ID: 728 The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes Started at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Completed at: 09/15/03 09:54:50 Mailboxes processed:0 Messages moved: 0 Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB Deleted messages: 0 Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB. I know there are messages in these mailboxes older than 3 days Any ideas on if I'm missing something? Current config Windows 2000 SP4 Exchange Server 5.5 Sp4 TIA, Joshua Joshua Morgan Senior Network Administrator AIMCO _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: symantec mail security
The docs are on the CD, in the \docs directory, iirc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean-Paul Natola Posted At: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:48 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: symantec mail security Subject: symantec mail security Hi everyone, I;m new to exchange ready to deploy, and I just received Symantec mail security for Exchange, unfortunate since we are non-profit, we do not get any support from Symantec in any way shape or form, Can any recommend a good practice for using Mail Security, as far as installing it on the same server or different server, Quarantine locations etc,, I would appreciate any Links or docs or thoughts. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: System wide signature
You scroll down until you find the links you told Arlo wouldn't work, and click on them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature How would you do an event sink? Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature If they want internal signatures they will have to spend some money for something like Nemx. If they want external, you can use the free event sink. So I would ask them what the budget is on this and take it from there. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature Its just a question that was asked of my from the big guys. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature You want disclaimers on internal mail? Why? - Original Message - From: Gregory Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM Subject: RE: System wide signature Thanks for the information, but we are using outlook and both of these knowledge base articles say it won't work with MAPI. Anybody else have any ideas? Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature Hi Greg, http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317327 or http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317680 -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature Sorry, Running Exchange 2000 SP3 Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature What version of MS Exchange are you running? -- From: Gregory Householder Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System wide signature Hello everyone, I've been asked if there is a way to add a confidentiality clause to the end off all of our messages that are sent system wide. I know you could put it into a signature file, but I'm not sure if there is a way to set it up on the server so that all emails get it attached to it. Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus with XP
One of those hosts file viruses relocates the hosts file to c:\windows\help (or c:\winnt\help). It does not overwrite your existing hosts file, but puts a bogus one in the help directory and modifies the registry so windows looks there instead. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus with XP What is the name of this file and where is it location? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus with XP Check to see if your local hosts file has a bunch of bogus entries. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus with XP My home computer (window XP) was infected with virus and I clean it. Now when I open my browser and go to www.google.com it take me to another website www.cpanel.net. Has anyone seen this before and I do I fix this? Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Destroy all backups after 60 days (or whatever they want the VM retention to be). -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Don't back anything up. :) -Original Message- From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Ed, I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion. A colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today. My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability under new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more and more of an audit train. Senior managers throughout the industry are over reacting by taking the position of backing up less information to prevent someone from saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and having it come back to bite them somewhere down the road. Kelly -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Quit doing brick level backup! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups? Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to present options. Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know of a package with thie capability? Thanks in advance, Kelly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? - RESOLVED
I got a chance to stop and start the IS (and the IMC too for good measure) and the turftable changes finally took effect. Apparently most of the time restarting the IMC is all you need but sometimes the IS must be restarted too (this is exchange 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp3). Tom -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I tried your reg file and that didn't help either. I found (with google's help) a user on a forum somewhere that ran into the same problem. He had to restart the IS for the turftable changes to take. I can't restart the IS right now but will try that later. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Clean out the registry storage of TurfTable. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete rs]TurfTable An empty table is two zero byte values in a row. QuickFix: REGEDIT4 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete rs] TurfTable=hex(7):00,00 EndQuickFix: Put the above 4 lines into TurfTable.reg file. Stop the IMC. Import it into the registry. Start the IMC. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I completely cleared out the turftable so it should not reject anything, and it still rejects this message. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Check for @aa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] both are valid to turf the message. You can temporarily rename the message to .eml and open it to check it out for other details. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Tom, With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same setup you are and have not experienced this to date. I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is causing this. Jim -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode
RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??
I completely cleared out the turftable so it should not reject anything, and it still rejects this message. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Check for @aa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] both are valid to turf the message. You can temporarily rename the message to .eml and open it to check it out for other details. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Tom, With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same setup you are and have not experienced this to date. I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is causing this. Jim -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??
I tried your reg file and that didn't help either. I found (with google's help) a user on a forum somewhere that ran into the same problem. He had to restart the IS for the turftable changes to take. I can't restart the IS right now but will try that later. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Clean out the registry storage of TurfTable. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete rs]TurfTable An empty table is two zero byte values in a row. QuickFix: REGEDIT4 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete rs] TurfTable=hex(7):00,00 EndQuickFix: Put the above 4 lines into TurfTable.reg file. Stop the IMC. Import it into the registry. Start the IMC. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I completely cleared out the turftable so it should not reject anything, and it still rejects this message. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Check for @aa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] both are valid to turf the message. You can temporarily rename the message to .eml and open it to check it out for other details. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? Tom, With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same setup you are and have not experienced this to date. I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is causing this. Jim -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??
I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the IMC was stoppted). It turf'ed it again? I thought maybe the turftable on our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so I removed it there and restarted both IMC's. It got turf'ed again... I then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted both IMC's. Still gets turf'ed. What is going on here? Is there another service I need to stop and start? I don't want to reboot right now, but can later if necessary. Tom Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5
Be advised that you cannot use the new biggie sized PST files (unicode) for cache mode one Exchange 5.5 (It won't let you). The result of this is that it will create a 2g limited pst file, and if your mailbox is over about 1.5g (pst's take more space to save the messages) it will die and you will have to disable cache mode until you get your mailbox on the server well below 2g. Tom -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 Upgrade to Outlook 2003 and use cache mode. I am advised that it works with back versions of Exchange, though I haven't personally verified it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NetNinja Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002/XP Conecting to Exchange 5.5 all maybe somebody out there is in a similar predicament. I have a user who is using Outlook XP/2002 and they are connecting to my Exchange server via a VPN connection. There is no way in He** that I am going to setup a pop3 or Imap connection point for them. Every so often this user starts getting slow response times. A dialog box pops up and tries to establish a connection with the exchange server. I have users who have a similar setup. But they are using Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 and they don't experience the same delays. This user lives out in California but when they came to Atlanta they were experiencing the same thing. Exchange 5.5 has the latest service pack4. Please don't say upgrade to Exchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for every email account you create. I think we are going Lotus and drop Microsoft all together. Anybody have any ideas? Exchange 5.5 has the lastest serivce pack4. Please don't say upgrade to Exhchange 2003. That's not in our budget and also we have about 200 email accounts and in Exchange 2003 you have to pay for evey email acount you create. I think we are going Lotus and drop microsoft all together. Anybody have any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions
Too bad they don't support Exchange 5.5 with these new versions. I read somewhere that 40% of exchange servers are still on 5.5. I am stuck on 2.18 here. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions 3.5 And I have version for in the lab - it has some amazing features. I think my favorite is still Sybari Antigen, but this SAV 4 is great in its own way. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Fyodorov, Andrey Subject: RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions What version of SAV is that? I don't think you can do anything like that with the Exchange 5.5 antivirus or the latest smtp gateway antivirus. Tom -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions Never mind. Got it working. I was trying to stick the expression into the Subject Line filter. Instead I had to stick it into the Spam Rule/Subject Line. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions Hello, I am trying to configure NAVEX to scan message subject lines with regular expressions but it is not quite understanding me (or am I doing something wrong?) I am trying to give it this expression: (\([Nn]ew \)|\([Ll]ast \)|\([Ll]atest \)|\([Nn]ewest \)|\([Cc]urrent \))(\([Mm]icrosoft \)|\([Nn]et \)|\([Ii]nternet \)|\([Nn]etwork \))*(\([Ss]ecurity \)|\([Cc]ritical \))*(\([Uu]pdate\)|\([Pp]atch\)|\([Pp]ack\)|\([Uu]pgrade\)) When I click Save, NAVEX breaks up this string into a bunch of smaller strings. Am I expecting too much from NAVEX? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions
What version of SAV is that? I don't think you can do anything like that with the Exchange 5.5 antivirus or the latest smtp gateway antivirus. Tom -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions Never mind. Got it working. I was trying to stick the expression into the Subject Line filter. Instead I had to stick it into the Spam Rule/Subject Line. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Symantec Antivirus for Exchange and regular expressions Hello, I am trying to configure NAVEX to scan message subject lines with regular expressions but it is not quite understanding me (or am I doing something wrong?) I am trying to give it this expression: (\([Nn]ew \)|\([Ll]ast \)|\([Ll]atest \)|\([Nn]ewest \)|\([Cc]urrent \))(\([Mm]icrosoft \)|\([Nn]et \)|\([Ii]nternet \)|\([Nn]etwork \))*(\([Ss]ecurity \)|\([Cc]ritical \))*(\([Uu]pdate\)|\([Pp]atch\)|\([Pp]ack\)|\([Uu]pgrade\)) When I click Save, NAVEX breaks up this string into a bunch of smaller strings. Am I expecting too much from NAVEX? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2003.
I am using the Blackberry desktop with outlook 2003. I am using the final released Outlook (11.5608.5606) and Desktop Manager 3.6.0.54. I used to have an older version of the desktop manager which did NOT work with outlook 2003. Tom -Original Message- From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2003. No only problem I have found is no Blackberry desktop support. Ryan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2003. We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on our client systems. My question is... Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002? I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that we can have a more gradual rollout. Thanks Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hot off the Fixes....
MS03-046 is listed as critical and involves somebody sending bogus data to your smtp port. In our case, the smtp port of our exchange server is not directly connected to the internet - our external SMTP interface is a sendmail firewall that forwards the email to an antivirus gateway and then to the exchange machine. In this scenario, the bogus smtp data is much less likely to ever reach the exchange server. If your exchange SMTP port is directly on the internet then I would be in a hurry to load that patch. Tom -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hot off the Fixes Anyone applied these yet? http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-046.asp http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-047.asp Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions changing on pickup directory
What if you turn on security event logging? Maybe that will log the change in permissions and tell you when and what user account did it? Tom -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions changing on pickup directory Well, I kinda hacked a solution into place... Just running a cacls against it every few hours with scheduled tasks... Not the nicest way to do it... -Original Message- From: Chris Levis Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permissions changing on pickup directory I have a couple of webpages using CDO to send mail. For them to work, I have to give IWAM_server write access to the pickup directory of my Exch2k-SP3 server. So I give IWAM those rights and the pages work fine. However, we try out the webpage again a few hours later, and we get an access denied error. So I look at the permissions on the pickup directory and see that IWAM has been removed. I assume Exchange has repermissioned pickup to be tighter. So I tried changing it again (and unchecking inherit permissions from parent..), and again it works for a while before breaking. Am I supposed to be doing this a different way? Thanks! There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who do not. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and Business Continuity Practices
http://messageone.com/solutions/EMS.asp They had a trial by fire of that type of scenario with the recent blackout and hurricane, I guess. Maybe they have customer referrals of people who actually had the disaster. Also, I hear that they include Chris Scharff's cell phone number in every box. -Original Message- From: W.Egan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The current plan is that if HQ were wiped out by disaster (natural or otherwise), having a remote replicated exchange information store and domain controller would allow us to bring up the information store in a matter of minutes if we so desired. Or alternative products that are better suited to this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
Did you check out this article?? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;820852 Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1) I am a little too use to Veritas and Ex 5.5 so I am new to the 'STM' file and the backup procedures of Exchange2K3 (same as 2000 it appears). I am trying to backup using NTBackup to a disk, all the rest of the backup completes but I can not get the Exchange portion to backup correctly. It appears from the log, I get the volumes and (based on size) what appears to be the Public folders but I can't seem to get the Private store to backup. At the very bottom (pasted below) is where it fails. I've searched for the error in the 'Q' articles, I don't seem to find anything (looking in Exchange2000 kB's). Maybe it's just a RC bug... -Original Message- To: Finch Brett Subject: Full Backup Status Operation: Backup Active backup destination: File Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup (via shadow copy) of C: C_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:25. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 591 Files: 3588 Bytes: 182,742,183 Time: 3 minutes and 40 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of D: D_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #2 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 150 Files: 520 Bytes: 51,624,632 Time: 12 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of F: F_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #3 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Directories: 263 Files: 4262 Bytes: 407,445,513 Time: 1 minute and 40 seconds Backup of U: \\homeserver\homeshare$ Backup set #4 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 101 Files: 2706 Bytes: 116,742,999 Time: 1 minute and 7 seconds Backup of HOMESERVER\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group Backup set #5 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Backup is already active. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupSetup()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Functions called in an invalid sequence. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupClose()' additional data '-' The operation was ended. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 0 Files: 0 Bytes: 0 Time: 1 second -- The operation did not successfully complete. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 RBL
-Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] While I would love to not have the spam traffic hit my network at all, the only effective way to do that is with the blacklists in blocking mode. That is absolutely not true. Utterly false. They are the state of the art of late-1990s spamblocking technology. Unfortunately, it's not the 90s any more. (I'm disagreeing with EdC here also, I just happened to pick your message to reply to) Doing that is just not acceptable in a business environment. That is absolutely 100% true. Utterly factual. :) On the other hand, my Exchange 2003 lab server that receives my personal mail has those RBLs turned on in full blocking mode. My main personal account was getting about 200+ spams a day and maybe 5-10 real mails before I turned on the RBL blocking in Exchange 2003, since then it has cut it to maybe 10 spams still making it to my box, and frankly if some real mail bounces, my friends and family know how to get me another way. That's nice, if friends and family were the only ones we had business relationships with. But not all of us are Amway reps or Mary Kay distributers. There are real antispam solutions extant, and they're far more accurate than DNSBLs alone. Although DNSBLs are a useful component of a real solution. For the next three weeks, until every last one of them is DDOS'd off the planet. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
Look people, he's out of the comp copies of his book. Either ping Greg offline, or go buy the darned book. It's only twelve bucks US$! http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0595289703 -tom [ various me too responses snipped] -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A CHALLENGE to the List [ ] I have a limited supply of books so I will accept the first 10-12 responses to this challenge. All fair-minded individuals will accept this challenge and the rest of the pompous bags of gas will be exposed for what they are. [ ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - Relay??
telnet exmail.macombisd.org 25 gives you: 220 **0*2*** *22*200***2*00*0***0*00 You first have a question for Macomb ISD's PIX administrator. First order of business: turn off the stupid Mailguard feature. no fixup protocol smtp 25. Then get him or her to look at why the pix is refusing your traffic. -tom -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:59 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help - Relay?? Subject: Help - Relay?? Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - Relay??
What is in the bounce message now that you've disabled the Stupid Mailguard feature? What antispam/antivirus software do you have in there, and what sort of traffic is it configured to dump? -tom -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:29 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help - Relay?? Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? I had the Mailguard disabled on the PIX. This is interesting thoughI can receive just fine from my test Hotmail account. However, I cannot receive from Yahoo or Advnet.net. Must be the way the Yahoo and Advnet.net mailservers look at my mailserver Any ideas? Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Then What TOm suggested maybe the problem. I have had 5.7.1 relay errors happen when MailGuard has been switched on at a PIX Firewall that was in the loop. From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:09:52 -0400 Hi Tony and thanks for the reply. I also have a Advnet.net account that gets the same bounce when sending directly to the Exchange server (@exmail.macombisd.org). Our DNS points exmail.macombisd.org to 64.88.83.251. The reverse DNS lookup points to xmail1 (name of the server). Hope this makes some kind of sense. Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help - Relay?? All email from Yahoo or just the one account. From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help - Relay?? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:44 -0400 Hello This is a message I get back when I try to send mail directly to the exchange server from a Yahoo account. The address I am trying to send to is [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 64.88.83.251 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.88.83.251. Can anyone shed some light on this bounce? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding another smtp address and making it primary
I'd probably add a new recipient policy. I thoroughly enjoy the results I achieve by never touching the default one. Especially never changing the default SMTP domain on the default recipient policy. (this may be one of those superstition things, of course) -tom -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:39 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Subject: RE: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Modify your Recipient Policy :-) See, that wasn't too hard. In your recip. Policy properties, you have the e-mail addresses defined. Add the second address, and choose Set as Primary. It will update all the users automagically. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:31 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Subject: Adding another smtp address and making it primary Hello All, My client has merged with another firm.Is there a tool to add another smtp address and making it primary without going thru' the hassle of manually touching every user account? Exchange 2000 Server enterprise edition. Sp3 / windows 2000 sp2. Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves completed, but....
I had this same problem moving from an NT4/EX55 server to a new WIN2k/EX55 server using move mailbox. After backing up the affected mailboxes with EXMERGE, I tried moving one back to the old server. If I remember correctly, the move mailbox function saw the bogus empty mailbox on the old server and deleted it (and then didn't bother moving it because of the error). This happened to about 5 mailboxes out of 250. Tom -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but First, even though these mailboxes are duplicated, is the user able to open it ok and access all their items? If so, maybe just run the Cleanup Agent on the old server. Another suggestion might be to try and move the mailbox back. It should error out, and may remove the orphaned item for you. If it works, then check the new server and see if it shows up. If not, move it back to the new server. Have you checked Technet (KB) at all? Orphaned Mailbox maybe? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:30 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Mailbox moves completed, but Subject: Mailbox moves completed, but Good afternoon, I have completed moving 1700+ mailboxes from one server to the other. We are using Outlook 98 Exchange Windows 2000. After the moves were completed I have a few stray mailboxes that are hanging around that are duplicated on the two servers. Under total K they show 0K, even though the mailbox on the correct server (the one moved to) show the correct space 58,098K. I am afraid if we delete the mailbox on the almost empty server, we will delete the real mailbox. So we don't want to do that. We could dump the mailbox to a PST, delete the mailbox and restore the mailbox, but that would cause problems because all communications to the old mailbox would be severed and people couldn't do replies to the eMAILs that are sitting in the mailbox. Meetings couldn't be canceled. What a quandary. What do we do? Just turn off the server and clean it off.. I don't think so. Thanks for any help you might have. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox moves completed, but....
Did you try moving one back? I think that will delete the empty one and just quit without moving it (and thus fixing the problem). Tom -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but We are on Exchange 5.5. I used the Exchange Administrator -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but That would be the Exchange System Manager. The same thing you probably used to move the mailboxes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but I am sorry. What is ESM? I do not believe I have every used it? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox moves completed, but Go to ESM, browse to information store/Mailboxes, right click on the Maiboxes and select Run Cleanup Agent. Better now? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Duncan Scott Subject: Mailbox moves completed, but Good afternoon, I have completed moving 1700+ mailboxes from one server to the other. We are using Outlook 98 Exchange Windows 2000. After the moves were completed I have a few stray mailboxes that are hanging around that are duplicated on the two servers. Under total K they show 0K, even though the mailbox on the correct server (the one moved to) show the correct space 58,098K. I am afraid if we delete the mailbox on the almost empty server, we will delete the real mailbox. So we don't want to do that. We could dump the mailbox to a PST, delete the mailbox and restore the mailbox, but that would cause problems because all communications to the old mailbox would be severed and people couldn't do replies to the eMAILs that are sitting in the mailbox. Meetings couldn't be canceled. What a quandary. What do we do? Just turn off the server and clean it off.. I don't think so. Thanks for any help you might have. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick Level Backup
I just installed Office 2003 final from MSDN and was able to export my whole mailbox to a PST. It shows up as 1.8Gig on the exchange 5.5 server, and the PST file is 3.5Gig. Tom -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Everything will fail on a mailbox that's over two gbytes that pushes the data to a pst file. Outlook 11 is supposed to have fixed this, though. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 5:33 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Brick Level Backup Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Exmerge fails on mailboxes over 2gig... Tom -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Exmerge -Original Message- From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Brick Level Backup Hi all What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have gave up on Arcserve as it crashes to many times on critical restores. Any advice welcome. Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick Level Backup
I always get errors in the exmerge log that I assume were due to antivirus (NAV for exchange 5.5) slowing things down. Do you have to stop AV to run this? Tom -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup I don't do that. Here's the basics of what I do: Exmerge (with various command line switches that I'm too lazy to look up right now). Cd \exmergedata Del pst.9.zip Ren pst.8.zip pst.9.zip Ren pst.7.zip pst.8.zip .. Ren pst.zip pst.1.zip Zip -m -9 pst.zip *.pst This is in a batch file that gets run nightly via the scheduler. I keep 10 days of snapshots of select mailboxes. Customer is happy, it was easy to script, and it didn't cost anything other than a bit of disk space. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup But if you keep on dumping new data into the same PST, eventually it will grow quite large, even if your online mailbox limit is low. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup This is true. I've never worked with an Exchange system where the mailbox limits were set anywhere near 2GB, so it's never been an issue for me. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Exmerge fails on mailboxes over 2gig... Tom -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Exmerge -Original Message- From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Brick Level Backup Hi all What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have gave up on Arcserve as it crashes to many times on critical restores. Any advice welcome. Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist
oh yeesh. is it thursday again already? -Original Message- From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:00 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist Im not one to usually post, and have been on the list for only about a year now. Within that year I have learned town things: 1) there are a handful of people on this list who REALLY know their stuff AND actively post here(and me thinks James is one of them) and 2)this list is one of the funniest damn list I can think of for just this reasonive gotten flamed myself a few times. I think its just a matter of taking it all in stride Move on -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist I think the travesty is in your flaming post, but that is my opinion and I am entitled to one. What does his company's website have to do with Verisign hijacking unregistered domains? Absolutely nothing and is unrelated to the list. Your comments are unnecessary and directed as a personal attack. I would appreciate it if you would refrain from posting to the list unless you can contribute in a useful manner. - Scott Weston - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Invisible corrupt message on EX5.5 server
We are running exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k sp3 server. I have been using
outlook 2003 beta for a long time (I now have the final version installed)
and apparently it has left some garbage in my inbox and the administrators
(which I also open with my profile).
I only found out about this when I installed BE 9.0 on the server (I had
been using NTBACKUP) and accidentally did a mailbox (BRICK) backup (bless me
father for I have sinned, my last full backup was yesterday). The
information store backup runs without problems, but the brick backup logs
these failures:
Backup - \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft
Exchange Mailboxes\Administrator [administrator]Top of Information
StoreFrom
AdminN
Notification: Inbound Mail Failure is a corrupt file.
This file cannot verify.
WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes\Alverson, Tom
[toma]FinderUnread
Mail
Outlook 10 Message Manager (MS Exchange Settings) is a corrupt file.
This file cannot verify.
WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes\Alverson, Tom [toma]Top of
Information
StoreInbox
Outlook 10 Message Manager (MS Exchange Settings) is a
corrupt
file.
This file cannot verify.
I have tried emptying my inbox but it still finds the corrupt message
there. Short of deleting my account and recreating it (which will be my
last resort) does anyone have suggestions for how to delete these things?
OWA does not see them either.
Tom
â²Úh²PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(ú«qïÞÅÈ_j¨mg{^özm§ÿâÊZ®Ib²×(÷
¸§þ\«Êez{^ì\
©àz¶j zV§éà+!N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²)åËZvh§³
§Ê
RE: Invisible corrupt message on EX5.5 server
That is a good possibility. I'll try to exmerge it and see if that
generates any errors. I did download the latest build from Veritas instead
of installing the older build off of the CD.
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Invisible corrupt message on EX5.5 server
So, the only thing that sees a bad message is the brick level backup? I's
just stop doing it. It's certainly possible that OL2003 has items that
BE9.0 doesn't understand.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Invisible corrupt message on EX5.5 server
We are running exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k sp3 server. I have been using
outlook 2003 beta for a long time (I now have the final version installed)
and apparently it has left some garbage in my inbox and the administrators
(which I also open with my profile).
I only found out about this when I installed BE 9.0 on the server (I had
been using NTBACKUP) and accidentally did a mailbox (BRICK) backup (bless me
father for I have sinned, my last full backup was yesterday). The
information store backup runs without problems, but the brick backup logs
these failures:
Backup - \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft
Exchange Mailboxes\Administrator [administrator]Top of Information
StoreFrom
AdminN
Notification: Inbound Mail Failure is a corrupt file.
This file cannot verify.
WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes\Alverson, Tom
[toma]FinderUnread
Mail
Outlook 10 Message Manager (MS Exchange Settings) is a corrupt file.
This file cannot verify.
WARNING: \\S3CIN\Microsoft Exchange Mailboxes\Alverson, Tom [toma]Top of
Information
StoreInbox
Outlook 10 Message Manager (MS Exchange Settings) is a
corrupt
file.
This file cannot verify.
I have tried emptying my inbox but it still finds the corrupt message
there. Short of deleting my account and recreating it (which will be my
last resort) does anyone have suggestions for how to delete these things?
OWA does not see them either.
Tom
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxm^zx%S ^jZ 2G(L\xfyb))
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Extracting to pst
How much $ is this software?? -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Extracting to pst Nope, I think the number of mailboxes you can read is based on the licenses you purchased. It is a great piece of software. One of my 5.5 customers does snapshot backups to a NAS and they use it all the time. - Jim sends -Original Message- From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 2:20 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Extracting to pst Subject: RE: Extracting to pst I thought the software would only read mailbox stores of up to 250 users! Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 September 2003 12:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Extracting to pst Why not do increments of 250? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Extracting to pst Vitamin Fortified Power Control ? - Original Message - From: Aaron Shimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 3:20 AM Subject: Extracting to pst Hi all I have Power Control which I use to extract mailboxes when necessary. But my version only works up to 250 mailboxes. What would you recommend for 250+ mailboxes? Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick Level Backup
Veritas NetBackup can be fully controlled via CLI. -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:47 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Brick Level Backup Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup We are being forced to re-evaluate arcserve by our development team because it's the only product they've found that they can properly interface with via CLI or API. This isn't for exchange backups, but I still feel a bit sick about the idea of arcserve being installed on any of our servers. We're told that the latest version is stable, but I'm skeptical. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick Level Backup
Exmerge fails on mailboxes over 2gig... Tom -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Exmerge -Original Message- From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Brick Level Backup Hi all What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have gave up on Arcserve as it crashes to many times on critical restores. Any advice welcome. Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 0 items, 7 unread
I have 7 pink elephants in my cube, but nobody else can see them. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread User reports - that helped. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread If you right-click the folder and choose mark all as read, what happens? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mass Mailings
I use Listserv also, and I'm very happy with the product. The support is simply excellent, also. How much is outsourcing costing you? If money's tight and you want a product that's got a decent installed base, look at Majordomo or Mailman for the *n?x platforms. http://www.greatcircle.com/majordomo/ http://www.list.org/ -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:12 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Mass Mailings Subject: RE: Mass Mailings Did look at Lsoft but it is too pricey for my lot! -Original Message- From: Wehner, Paul (wehnerpl) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 September 2003 19:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Mailings I second the LSoft recomendation. Univ. of Cinci uses it and it's amazingly fast. Like 10K messages delivered in 60 minutes. We have webshield also installed on the box and god protect me, but it's all running fine-:) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Mailings ListServ from LSOFT.COM is a good product. You set it up on it's own machine and subdomain (lists.Sanantonio.gov) and let it chug. One of the BETTER qualities of this product is that you can tune it so that a domain only gets one message for the number of people subscribed, rather than one message per recipient. (i.e. twenty users are listed at BELLSOUTH.NET.. Only one message gets sent to BELLSOUTH.NET) You can also chunk the traffic so that you don't flood out your ISP. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:46 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Mass Mailings Subject: Mass Mailings Hello All- We currently have a division that is requesting to be able to send mass mails through our server to opt-in recipients of a monthly newsletter, this would be upwards of 70,000 pieces per month and will increase as required. My question is has anyone received similar requests and how were they handled? The division head assures me that this list will be maintained and kept up to date and users who request to be removed from the list will be, they currently outsource this project and want to bring it in-house to save money. I believe in the long run this will cause more problems than the savings will add up to, any suggestions would be appreciated. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need best solution for two server environment
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/exchange2000/maintain/optimize/e2kfront.asp Note: User mailboxes cannot be stored on the front-end server. -Original Message- From: Chris Megginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:33 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Need best solution for two server environment Subject: Need best solution for two server environment I have two E2K EE servers. Both contain mailboxes. I want one to be a front-end server for both. Is this doable? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NTBackup of Exchange * Need Restore Options *
http://www.ontrack.com/powercontrols/ will do this, iirc. -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:30 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NTBackup of Exchange * Need Restore Options * Subject: NTBackup of Exchange * Need Restore Options * Back in the early days of the Exchange server ( NT4.0, now with SP6 )setup, We run NTBackup against the Exchange (5.5) server. It was free and after a case of needing to use the backup, we realize we had to get different software. Well, for legal reasons, I'm stuck going through a bunch of these tapes looking for evidence. Is there a way to Restore the data/files on the tapes without restoring it back to the Exchange server itself first? TIA Regards, Michael Henry E-Mail Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Followup on OWA suddenly died thread
Last Friday I reported that all of the sudden our Exchange 5.5 OWA server started crashing with ASP 0115 errors. Andy David (the godlike one) immediately zeroed in on my usage of Outlook 2003 and it's effect. While researching the problem I found that it was only MY mailbox that would crash it, so I started to clean out my inbox (completely emptying it) and also emptying my deleted items folder which was pretty full. I then got the patch from MS by calling PSS and having them email it to me. I tried a before test but I could no longer crash OWA with my cleaned up inbox. I applied the CDO patch ONLY to my OWA server, not to the Exchange mail server. I did this because rebooting the OWA server is no big problem, but rebooting the exchange server should probably only be done after hours. So I can't verify that the patch works, but it probably does. I'm not going to load up my inbox again just to see. The OWA server has been running fine since Friday. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
There were 99 files in there and some were from 1999. Even though I had stopped web publishing in services, it could not delete the temp file from my session untill I killed inetinfo.exe with task manager. After restarting web publishing services, it started to come up but stalled with my inbox screen with frames set up but blank. I shut down and I'm running a low level disk diag (since I saw some atapi errors in the log from a few weeks ago) and then I'll try it again in case a full reboot is better than just restarting inetinfo. Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
One other thing -- I have the phonelist web page set up on the server that uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA code) Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' - Get ting Wierder and Wierder
I have now determined that after cleaning out the webtemp directory and rebooting, I can access other peoples mailboxes without crashing OWA. Once I try to access mine, it (inetinfo.exe) dies trying to render my inbox. I think I will clean out my inbox and see what happens next. I have been searching google for related problams and have found several people with very similar problems and no solution ever posted. Microsoft suggested to one admin to just upgrade to Exchange 2000 and that would probably fix his problem. I guess if I upgraded my '89 Toyota Corolla to a '04 model that would probably fix the nasty carburettor problems it has too... Tom -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Ok, you got me... I am the bad user who crashes OWA when I access my own inbox, and I am running a beta (build 5329) of Outlook 2003. Is there a fix? (did I mention before that Andy David is God Like??) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Anyone using Outlook 2003? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' One other thing -- I have the phonelist web page set up on the server that uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA code) Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Thanks. Looks like I need to call PSS to get the file. The weird thing is that I have been running Office beta for a long long time and this problem just cropped up 2 days ago. -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;818709 Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Posted At: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:19 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Ok, you got me... I am the bad user who crashes OWA when I access my own inbox, and I am running a beta (build 5329) of Outlook 2003. Is there a fix? (did I mention before that Andy David is God Like??) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Anyone using Outlook 2003? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' One other thing -- I have the phonelist web page set up on the server that uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA code) Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Once I have accessed my mailbox on the exchange server with outlook 2003 I have apparently infected it with the PR_FREEBUSY_ENTRYIDS property, a fourth field in something that previously had 3. I would have to delete my mailbox and create a new one to get rid of the 4th field. And once I do that, some other rogue user will install Outlook 2003 and crash it again. -Original Message- From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Don't you love it when, You tell the Doctor it hurts to do that, then he says Then don't do that!. Then have you try OL2000 or OL2002? Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Ok, you got me... I am the bad user who crashes OWA when I access my own inbox, and I am running a beta (build 5329) of Outlook 2003. Is there a fix? (did I mention before that Andy David is God Like??) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Anyone using Outlook 2003? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' One other thing -- I have the phonelist web page set up on the server that uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA code) Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
I dunno how much you're paying for MessageLabs' service, but it's pretty much a customized front end for the open-source SpamAssassin. The only benefit I can see over a stock Postfix/Sendmail gateway using Spamassassin, perhaps with MailScanner or amavisd or Anomy Sanitizer for some more advanced content routing, is that it gives more granular per-user settings. That's a lot of money on a bet that they can do better than 99.5% with 0 false positives than I do with a server I had laying around gathering dust, and routing sensitive information through a third party. Not familiar with how much better Postini does than 99.5% catch with 0 FPs. My users are simply thrilled. But I haven't told them they *could* have individualized Bayesian databases rather than a monolithic domain-wide one. -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:31 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Subject: Messagelabs. Postini, etc.. Hello all, I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the above services could take a moment and share them, good or bad? We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help control spam and add an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while the anti-spam and anti-virus scanning service are good, the outbound mail has been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back to our gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been poor as well. TIA for any comments. Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sobig.F alert
Which begs an analysis of your .sig line, eh? -tom -Original Message- From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:34 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Sobig.F alert Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert That is actually overestimating the price of security. Redhat is free (without support), and a pc to run this would cost less than 250 if you knew where to look. Thank you, Mitchell D. Lawrence **Good|Cheap|Fast (Pick Two)** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sobig.F alert
And a quick glance shows that state.gov's email passes through (something generic), sendmail, and Trend InterScan Viruswall before being delivered to an Exchange 5.5 box. The latter two, and presumably the former one, are all easily configurable to block based on any number of criteria, including attachment type, body and header content. I therefore have to assume that the hole in the price of security is the biggest one of all: personell. -Original Message- From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:34 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Sobig.F alert Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert That is actually overestimating the price of security. Redhat is free (without support), and a pc to run this would cost less than 250 if you knew where to look. Thank you, Mitchell D. Lawrence **Good|Cheap|Fast (Pick Two)** -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert It shouldn't...but yes, it does. I mean, come on. For the cost of a $250 PC and a $50 copy of RedHat 9.0 (actually, a recycled PII or PII would do), thrown in front of every access point to the network, they could be blocking every attachment on the Martin Blackstone list! BAS! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
We have 3 1/2 layers: 1- custom smap based linux box with spam filtering, attachment blocking, and some custom blocking of known bad stuff (this one is the 1/2 since it doesn't really scan for known viruses, just virus like emails) 2- Symantec Antivirus for SMTP Gateways: This is a separate machine that processes all inbound mail for our exchange server. 3- Symantec Antivirus for Exchange: Runs on the exchange server and scans everything (not just inbound from the internet). 4- Symantec Client Antivirus: All clients have this installed and if 1,2 and 3 fail this may save us. Tom -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
OK you win. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 3 Layers of Virus protection. 42. - Original Message - From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:40 AM Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. We use 3. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (gfd) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SWBELL.NET bouncing all of the sudden?
Yeah, it lets you do a HELO, but then on the MAIL FROM: it goes 550. I haven't tried all their servers (they do round-robin DNS on their MX records) because I'm lazy and it's not my problem. ;) -Original Message- From: Mitch Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 3:31 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: SWBELL.NET bouncing all of the sudden? Subject: SWBELL.NET bouncing all of the sudden? Has anyone else noticed recent bounce messages when users try to send mail to swbell.net? Any ideas why I am all of the sudden? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antivirus notifications
Could all you folks with the misconfigured AV servers please disable auto-replying to the spoofed FROM: lines in the latest generation of viruses? Jeez. It's worse than the stupid virus. The virus gets dumped and nobody ever sees it, but the NDRs and virus alerts go to people who didn't send the message, don't have a virus, and freak out. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus notifications
Good call, Peter. Here's a guy who's starting to compile a bunch of SpamAssassin rules for the virus bounce messages, might give you some starting points for your filters. I use SpamAssassin, but I intend to just reject them out-of-hand during the SMTP conversation before it ever gets that far. This isn't the first time this has happened, it's just the worst. I'm now convinced these things are less than worthless, and I'm gonna 550 them at the gateway. http://www.exit0.us/index.php/VirusBounceRules -tom -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 6:24 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Antivirus notifications Subject: RE: Antivirus notifications I could not possibly agree more! I've taken to blocking some of the more common AV auto-replies with my spam filters. -Peter -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antivirus notifications Could all you folks with the misconfigured AV servers please disable auto-replying to the spoofed FROM: lines in the latest generation of viruses? Jeez. It's worse than the stupid virus. The virus gets dumped and nobody ever sees it, but the NDRs and virus alerts go to people who didn't send the message, don't have a virus, and freak out. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP??
I am running Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways version 3.1.0.29. This has an option to block attachments by extension, but this blocks files even when they are in ZIP files. The Symantec (Norton) antivirus that runs on our exchange server (5.5) has a registry setting to control whether or not it looks in ZIP files for bad extension (it always scans for viruses in ZIP files). Does anyone know how to configure SAV for SMTP gateways to allow bad extensions when they are stored in ZIP files? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DEU Resume
I just gone one too. And the headers look legit: Received: from ops.xetron.com ([192.168.1.121]) by s3cin.xetron.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id RHLTYYTF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:08:21 -0400 Received: from fw.xetron.com ([192.168.1.1]) by ops.xetron.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2003081918073707859 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:37 -0400 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fw.xetron.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h7JM7aju024258 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:36 -0400 Received: from cpocwcp.hua.army.mil(138.27.195.254) by fw.xetron.com via smap (V2.1) id xma024249; Tue, 19 Aug 03 18:07:26 -0400 Received: by cpocwcp.hua.army.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id Q8GWXC9H; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:56 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: CPOCWCP DEU [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DEU Resume Received Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain X-Envfrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Bayes: 0.00 0.370709 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I got the same thing!! Thought it might be the new email virus, but it had no attachment. Just got another as I write this!!! -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DEU Resume Anyone here receiving auto responses from the U.S. Army for a resume you never sent to them? About the time a message I sent to the list was posted, I got a reply from the Army. Sorry.. Been there.. Done that... got the tee shirt and the DD-214. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP??
There is no white list, only a black list. -Original Message- From: Cary, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? Can you configure this (Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways) to only allow specific extensions? Basically block all by default except for the extensions you put on a white list? -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP?? I am running Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways version 3.1.0.29. This has an option to block attachments by extension, but this blocks files even when they are in ZIP files. The Symantec (Norton) antivirus that runs on our exchange server (5.5) has a registry setting to control whether or not it looks in ZIP files for bad extension (it always scans for viruses in ZIP files). Does anyone know how to configure SAV for SMTP gateways to allow bad extensions when they are stored in ZIP files? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DEU Resume
Yes, I think you have figured it out. Every time I make a post to this list I get another email from the Army. Tom -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I think that maybe [EMAIL PROTECTED] is subscribed to this list, and has an autoreply rule. It's probably not sobig related at all. -Peter -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I just gone one too. And the headers look legit: Received: from ops.xetron.com ([192.168.1.121]) by s3cin.xetron.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id RHLTYYTF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:08:21 -0400 Received: from fw.xetron.com ([192.168.1.1]) by ops.xetron.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2003081918073707859 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:37 -0400 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fw.xetron.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h7JM7aju024258 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:36 -0400 Received: from cpocwcp.hua.army.mil(138.27.195.254) by fw.xetron.com via smap (V2.1) id xma024249; Tue, 19 Aug 03 18:07:26 -0400 Received: by cpocwcp.hua.army.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id Q8GWXC9H; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:56 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: CPOCWCP DEU [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DEU Resume Received Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain X-Envfrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Bayes: 0.00 0.370709 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I got the same thing!! Thought it might be the new email virus, but it had no attachment. Just got another as I write this!!! -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DEU Resume Anyone here receiving auto responses from the U.S. Army for a resume you never sent to them? About the time a message I sent to the list was posted, I got a reply from the Army. Sorry.. Been there.. Done that... got the tee shirt and the DD-214. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST version - revisited
I have had good luck repairing bad (over 2G) pst files by using ontrack's easyrecovery utility. I bought the version that does all types of office files (doc, xls, mdb, pst) as well as doing low level hard disk recovery and it was about $500. You can get the various pieces for less. I did try the Microsoft approved method, which was to run a utility that chops off the file at 2G (you have to experiment to find out how much). Chopped off data is lost forever. Then you run scanpst and it can recover some of the data, but in the one I tried it lost all the folder names (it had to make up new names). Using easyrecovery resulted in two good PST's (it was over 2g so the output couldn't fit into one). Everything looked fine in the recovered PST files. Tom -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST version - revisited Ok not quite figured out. PST's are on cd. Copied to hdd, yes I remembered to uncheck RO. Still not able to access them. Tried scanpst. Not working very well. Any other ideas? TIA, Ali -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:48 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: PST version Subject: RE: PST version Actually, I figured it out... I had opened them with ol2003beta a while back. I'll just wait til the audit is over and re-install officexp. b thanks... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:31 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: PST version Subject: Re: PST version Maybe it isn't? Did you try running scanpst against it. From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PST version Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:03:23 -0400 Had to rebuild... had office XP, now have office2k. Trying to open my .PST. When I try to add it to the service, a pop-up so thoughtfully informs me: Exchange.PST is not a personal folders store. No, it is not checked read-only. Ideas? TIA, Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Sure they do. They've had it for a few hours. http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/defs.download.html -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:42 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Heads up on a new virus Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus Symantec doesn't have the virusdef file that blocks this ready for live update yet :-( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Black List Recommendation
Find anything good here? Interesting augmentation, if you don't do business with the target country... http://blackholes.us/ -Original Message- From: Greg Marr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:03 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Black List Recommendation Subject: Black List Recommendation Hi Am currently evaluating GFIs MailEssentials anti-spam product and would like to try the Black List functionality. Does anyone have a recommendation for a good black list??? Thanks in advance Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple domains.
Because you made a policy that actually applied to EVERY single recipient that told it to do that. Any new policy you make will be assigned a higher priority than your default policy, and will overwrite it for the recipients that the query that it's based upon (General screen, Modify, Find Now) applies to. Make one recipient policy. Add all the proper addresses. Apply it to nobody. And check (general modify find now) that it applies to nobody. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:37 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Multiple domains. Subject: RE: Multiple domains. Absolute madness last night. I was making the new policys which include the legacy domain names, some how EVERY single email address for EVERY single recipient in the whole organisation had there email address wiped, all that remained was the X400 addresses. What gives? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple domains.
The recipient policy doesn't have to apply to anybody (much less everybody) - they just need to BE there. Make a recipient policy that applies to nobody that has all those domains. Get rid of the connector. Problem solved. They'll bounce properly at that point. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Multiple domains. Subject: Multiple domains. Okay, weve got more than one local domain on the exchange server, only one domain is actually used for the servers, i.e. the active directory, the other domains are just legacy internet domains with the MX record set as our exchange server. To allow delivery of emails to people in the exchange organisation you can either use recipient policies with the desired domain, or alternatively add a new connector, add the address space and tick allow relaying to these domains. We have gone for the latter option as we do not want legacy email addresses created automatically within the domain, we only want people who we manually create email addresses to receive email from the legacy domain. However, the problem is we are now getting a large mail queue for the legacy domains as the server is attempting to relay the messages to the end user but the email address does not exist within our organisation. That is people are trying to send emails, i.e. spammers to email addresses that previously existed and the server is continually trying to relay that email back to itself and were getting all sorts of delay notifications etc. What I was wondering is how I can tell the server to realise that the email address doesn't exist and bounce it away ? Or perhaps im going about this whole thing the wrong way, maybe someone can enlighten me :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EDB Size ?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];813880 To be fair, the well-documented part mostly comes from several discussions of the issue on the Yahoogroups E2k list. A problem doesn't have to be documented in a qarticle to exist, after all. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 13, 2003 6:45 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: EDB Size ? Subject: RE: EDB Size ? All jokes aside about this topic... what do you mean well-documented inaccuracies? Is there something in a KB doc that talks about this? Alex -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions What are white space, and inherent and well-documented inaccuracies in reported mailbox sizes, Alex? I'll take Sino-Korean Open Relays for $500, Alex. -tom -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:50 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: EDB Size ? Subject: EDB Size ? Does anyone know why our edb size would be 50GB but when you export all of the users and their mailbox sizes to an Excel spreadsheet and add all the sizes of the mailboxes I only get 16GB? We are EX2000 SP3. Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
I forward all my virus notifications to Roger. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender? Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? Roger, This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you on...however, see below: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk import of contact list from Excel sheet into Exchange?
I've used BulkAddFromExcel, and it works great with users. Maybe BulkContactsFromExcel will do what you're looking for. http://www.cdolive.net/download/ -tom -Original Message- From: Greg Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Bulk import of contact list from Excel sheet into Exchange? Subject: RE: Bulk import of contact list from Excel sheet into Exchange? Exchange 2000 - Just want to add contacts (name and Email address) for affiliated company not part of our domain. Thanks, Greg -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk import of contact list from Excel sheet into Exchange? Exchange version? Are you wanting to add a mailbox for them on your servers or just add a Cust. Recipient entry in the GAL? -Original Message- From: Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bulk import of contact list from Excel sheet into Exchange? Is it possible? If so how? I have a list of contacts from an affiliated company's Exchange server in Excal format and I need to import it. Any idea how? Thanks Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EDB Size ?
What are white space, and inherent and well-documented inaccuracies in reported mailbox sizes, Alex? I'll take Sino-Korean Open Relays for $500, Alex. -tom -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:50 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: EDB Size ? Subject: EDB Size ? Does anyone know why our edb size would be 50GB but when you export all of the users and their mailbox sizes to an Excel spreadsheet and add all the sizes of the mailboxes I only get 16GB? We are EX2000 SP3. Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EDB Size ?
Sorry. That part was a joke; I'd assumed you'd seen this game show called Jeopardy and would understand that I was informing you what topic I'd chosen for the NEXT question, having answered the current question correctly. The former part was my answer to your question. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:12 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: EDB Size ? Subject: RE: EDB Size ? No it's not open relays because SMTP mail doesn't get stored in the priv.edb but thanks for playing. Besides we have an SMTP server for that. Alex -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions What are white space, and inherent and well-documented inaccuracies in reported mailbox sizes, Alex? I'll take Sino-Korean Open Relays for $500, Alex. -tom -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:50 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: EDB Size ? Subject: EDB Size ? Does anyone know why our edb size would be 50GB but when you export all of the users and their mailbox sizes to an Excel spreadsheet and add all the sizes of the mailboxes I only get 16GB? We are EX2000 SP3. Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Allow access to attachments
You mean this? http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:26 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Allow access to attachments Subject: Allow access to attachments Grrr. I have seen this article before but I can not find it. I have the attachments locked down on my Outlook Clients. I have a user with a need to receive an attachment. I can not find the right article to un block an attachment type .exe or something like that. Can anyone point me the the f***ing article please. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k server. I am running NAV for Exchange version 2.18 and no other antivirus software on the server. It has been running fine for months without problems. Today it started spewing the two following errors to the screen over and over and over: NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. A Microsoft Exchange store memory allocation has failed. (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 675) NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. Error Code = 0xc0090094, Additional = (null) (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 1131) I was also getting a bunch of alerts from my Blackberry server (running on a different machine) that I believe were just a side effect of the NAV broo-ha-ha. The virus defs are the latest from yesterday 6-1-2003 rev2. I have seen these navevapi.dll errors sporadically (one ever couple of days) but they did not seem to cause any problems. Now the errors are occurring about every second while the NAV service is running. I stopped NAV for now and have not seen any errors in the event log for about 15 minutes now (including blackberry). Has anyone seen this or does anyone have suggestions for getting NAV running again?? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
Thanks for all the replies. I had tried stopping starting the service earlier but got the errors as soon as it restarted. I also just got a message that someone was having trouble mailing a 7Meg PDF files to another exchange server in the same orgainization but over a WAN link. Maybe this email was causing NAV to freak. I had already downloaded the latest definitions but didn't update them right away because they were the same. I went ahead and ran the updater (the exe) while NAV was stopped and also went into the two lastest definitions directories and deleted a few files that were older than the definitions. Somehow the old files get pulled into the new definition directory during an update and I don't think they are needed. As soon as I started the service NAV moved the files from INCOMING to the dated directory and hasn't complained yet. Hopefully this fixes it. I am guessing that the problem was either the definitions were messed up or something about the 7meg email was causing nav to crash. Tom -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Tom, We have the same setup here that you do. 1) I would take Nate's advice about stopping/starting the NAV services first. However, one piece of advice...Go logon locally to the machine and do it from there. What we have had happen is that we restart the services via a remote session and it looks like it worked, but if you go logon locally, we were seeing the the service hadn't restarted...weird. 2) Nate and Bob are correct that it could very well be a corrupt .dat file...go reinstall it. We have had one instance here though where we had to uninstall NAV and reinstall it. HTH...let us know what worked. Jim Blunt Bechtel Hanford, Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I have seen this occur on our servers in two instances. 1) While you may have done this already. Stop and restart the NAV services. I have seen where they will whack out and doing thill settle them down. 2) The other thing I have seen and you have alluded to it here is that the virus DAT file may be corrupt resulting in NAV losing functionality. When this happened to me we downloaded the DAT from Symantec again and reinstalled it. This worked. I have also had it happen where we had to go back one version of the DAT because the current DAT was corrupt from Symantec. Or at least it was getting corrupted somewhere along the way between Symantec and my server. Either way we had to go back one. I hope something here helps. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 11:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k server. I am running NAV for Exchange version 2.18 and no other antivirus software on the server. It has been running fine for months without problems. Today it started spewing the two following errors to the screen over and over and over: NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. A Microsoft Exchange store memory allocation has failed. (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 675) NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. Error Code = 0xc0090094, Additional = (null) (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 1131) I was also getting a bunch of alerts from my Blackberry server (running on a different machine) that I believe were just a side effect of the NAV broo-ha-ha. The virus defs are the latest from yesterday 6-1-2003 rev2. I have seen these navevapi.dll errors sporadically (one ever couple of days) but they did not seem to cause any problems. Now the errors are occurring about every second while the NAV service is running. I stopped NAV for now and have not seen any errors in the event log for about 15 minutes now (including blackberry). Has anyone seen this or does anyone have suggestions for getting NAV running again?? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
It's doing it again... After the below changes NAV ran for about 10 minutes and then gave me the error messages once. It then ran another 10 minutes and started giving me the errors about every 2 minutes. I shut down NAV again for a while. I guess I'll start it up again later tonight and see how it goes. Symantec will probably have newer definitions available by then. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks for all the replies. I had tried stopping starting the service earlier but got the errors as soon as it restarted. I also just got a message that someone was having trouble mailing a 7Meg PDF files to another exchange server in the same orgainization but over a WAN link. Maybe this email was causing NAV to freak. I had already downloaded the latest definitions but didn't update them right away because they were the same. I went ahead and ran the updater (the exe) while NAV was stopped and also went into the two lastest definitions directories and deleted a few files that were older than the definitions. Somehow the old files get pulled into the new definition directory during an update and I don't think they are needed. As soon as I started the service NAV moved the files from INCOMING to the dated directory and hasn't complained yet. Hopefully this fixes it. I am guessing that the problem was either the definitions were messed up or something about the 7meg email was causing nav to crash. Tom -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Tom, We have the same setup here that you do. 1) I would take Nate's advice about stopping/starting the NAV services first. However, one piece of advice...Go logon locally to the machine and do it from there. What we have had happen is that we restart the services via a remote session and it looks like it worked, but if you go logon locally, we were seeing the the service hadn't restarted...weird. 2) Nate and Bob are correct that it could very well be a corrupt .dat file...go reinstall it. We have had one instance here though where we had to uninstall NAV and reinstall it. HTH...let us know what worked. Jim Blunt Bechtel Hanford, Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I have seen this occur on our servers in two instances. 1) While you may have done this already. Stop and restart the NAV services. I have seen where they will whack out and doing thill settle them down. 2) The other thing I have seen and you have alluded to it here is that the virus DAT file may be corrupt resulting in NAV losing functionality. When this happened to me we downloaded the DAT from Symantec again and reinstalled it. This worked. I have also had it happen where we had to go back one version of the DAT because the current DAT was corrupt from Symantec. Or at least it was getting corrupted somewhere along the way between Symantec and my server. Either way we had to go back one. I hope something here helps. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 11:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k server. I am running NAV for Exchange version 2.18 and no other antivirus software on the server. It has been running fine for months without problems. Today it started spewing the two following errors to the screen over and over and over: NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. A Microsoft Exchange store memory allocation has failed. (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 675) NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. Error Code = 0xc0090094, Additional = (null) (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 1131) I was also getting a bunch of alerts from my Blackberry server (running on a different machine) that I believe were just a side effect of the NAV broo-ha-ha. The virus defs are the latest from yesterday 6-1-2003 rev2. I have seen these navevapi.dll errors sporadically (one ever couple of days) but they did not seem to cause any problems. Now the errors are occurring about every second while the NAV service is running. I stopped NAV for now and have not seen any errors in the event log for about 15 minutes now (including blackberry). Has anyone seen this or does anyone have suggestions for getting NAV running again?? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
Mapi/vapi -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions What mode are you running in? MAPI? MAPI/VAPI? Nate -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 12:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... It's doing it again... After the below changes NAV ran for about 10 minutes and then gave me the error messages once. It then ran another 10 minutes and started giving me the errors about every 2 minutes. I shut down NAV again for a while. I guess I'll start it up again later tonight and see how it goes. Symantec will probably have newer definitions available by then. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks for all the replies. I had tried stopping starting the service earlier but got the errors as soon as it restarted. I also just got a message that someone was having trouble mailing a 7Meg PDF files to another exchange server in the same orgainization but over a WAN link. Maybe this email was causing NAV to freak. I had already downloaded the latest definitions but didn't update them right away because they were the same. I went ahead and ran the updater (the exe) while NAV was stopped and also went into the two lastest definitions directories and deleted a few files that were older than the definitions. Somehow the old files get pulled into the new definition directory during an update and I don't think they are needed. As soon as I started the service NAV moved the files from INCOMING to the dated directory and hasn't complained yet. Hopefully this fixes it. I am guessing that the problem was either the definitions were messed up or something about the 7meg email was causing nav to crash. Tom -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Tom, We have the same setup here that you do. 1) I would take Nate's advice about stopping/starting the NAV services first. However, one piece of advice...Go logon locally to the machine and do it from there. What we have had happen is that we restart the services via a remote session and it looks like it worked, but if you go logon locally, we were seeing the the service hadn't restarted...weird. 2) Nate and Bob are correct that it could very well be a corrupt .dat file...go reinstall it. We have had one instance here though where we had to uninstall NAV and reinstall it. HTH...let us know what worked. Jim Blunt Bechtel Hanford, Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I have seen this occur on our servers in two instances. 1) While you may have done this already. Stop and restart the NAV services. I have seen where they will whack out and doing thill settle them down. 2) The other thing I have seen and you have alluded to it here is that the virus DAT file may be corrupt resulting in NAV losing functionality. When this happened to me we downloaded the DAT from Symantec again and reinstalled it. This worked. I have also had it happen where we had to go back one version of the DAT because the current DAT was corrupt from Symantec. Or at least it was getting corrupted somewhere along the way between Symantec and my server. Either way we had to go back one. I hope something here helps. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 11:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on a win2k server. I am running NAV for Exchange version 2.18 and no other antivirus software on the server. It has been running fine for months without problems. Today it started spewing the two following errors to the screen over and over and over: NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. A Microsoft Exchange store memory allocation has failed. (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 675) NAVEVAPI error NAVEVAPI.DLL Internal Error. Error Code = 0xc0090094, Additional = (null) (C:\NAVMSE\Source\NAVEVAPI\NAVEVAPI.CPP, 1131) I was also getting a bunch of alerts from my Blackberry server (running on a different machine) that I believe were just a side effect of the NAV broo-ha-ha. The virus defs are the latest from yesterday 6-1-2003 rev2. I have seen these navevapi.dll errors sporadically (one ever couple of days) but they did not seem to cause any
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out...
I haven't run in mapi only mode since that was the only way it had. I did find one KB article on symantecs site and they blamed the memory allocation problem on exchange and just said to run perfwiz. I guess I'll run perfwiz tonight after everyone goes home and see if new definitions came out since then. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Have you tried it in MAPI only mode? Are there any other potentially related events in the App or Sys logs? Another possibility looming here is to uninstall and reinstall NAV for Exchange. -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 13:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... Mapi/vapi -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions What mode are you running in? MAPI? MAPI/VAPI? Nate -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 12:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... It's doing it again... After the below changes NAV ran for about 10 minutes and then gave me the error messages once. It then ran another 10 minutes and started giving me the errors about every 2 minutes. I shut down NAV again for a while. I guess I'll start it up again later tonight and see how it goes. Symantec will probably have newer definitions available by then. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks for all the replies. I had tried stopping starting the service earlier but got the errors as soon as it restarted. I also just got a message that someone was having trouble mailing a 7Meg PDF files to another exchange server in the same orgainization but over a WAN link. Maybe this email was causing NAV to freak. I had already downloaded the latest definitions but didn't update them right away because they were the same. I went ahead and ran the updater (the exe) while NAV was stopped and also went into the two lastest definitions directories and deleted a few files that were older than the definitions. Somehow the old files get pulled into the new definition directory during an update and I don't think they are needed. As soon as I started the service NAV moved the files from INCOMING to the dated directory and hasn't complained yet. Hopefully this fixes it. I am guessing that the problem was either the definitions were messed up or something about the 7meg email was causing nav to crash. Tom -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Tom, We have the same setup here that you do. 1) I would take Nate's advice about stopping/starting the NAV services first. However, one piece of advice...Go logon locally to the machine and do it from there. What we have had happen is that we restart the services via a remote session and it looks like it worked, but if you go logon locally, we were seeing the the service hadn't restarted...weird. 2) Nate and Bob are correct that it could very well be a corrupt .dat file...go reinstall it. We have had one instance here though where we had to uninstall NAV and reinstall it. HTH...let us know what worked. Jim Blunt Bechtel Hanford, Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I have seen this occur on our servers in two instances. 1) While you may have done this already. Stop and restart the NAV services. I have seen where they will whack out and doing thill settle them down. 2) The other thing I have seen and you have alluded to it here is that the virus DAT file may be corrupt resulting in NAV losing functionality. When this happened to me we downloaded the DAT from Symantec again and reinstalled it. This worked. I have also had it happen where we had to go back one version of the DAT because the current DAT was corrupt from Symantec. Or at least it was getting corrupted somewhere along the way between Symantec and my server. Either way we had to go back one. I hope something here helps. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Alverson, Tom Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 2, 2003 11:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 is freaking out... I am running
SpamBelt
Why would a company who sends me so much SPAM sell a product called SpamSucks!? Especially spam trying to sell me a product called SpamSucks! And sent with a throw-away account at juno.com as a reply-to address, yet sent through a spamming firm's (roving.com) servers... yeesh. How many more alarms need to go off here before people realize how egregiously these people commit the crime they're purported to guard against??? Just trying to help a struggling business gain exposure to their target audience... We now return you to your regularly scheduled technical discussion. I'll be over there adding sunbelt.com to my smtp gateway filters if you need me. Not that it'll help me since they obfuscate the injection point of their spam. -tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inbound email for deleted mailboxes wasting bandwidth.
This could be done with a separate machine that receives mail for your domain and only relays valid addresses to you. In order to help with the bandwidth problem, this machine would have to be somewhere that did not have a bandwidth limitation. Tom -Original Message- From: IT1(SW) Biesecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi everyone. I'm new to this group so here's a quick introduction. I'm a network Administrator in the US NAVY, currently on board the USS DEYO. My organization contains about 350 people so it is actually a fairly small network. While we are underway (as we are now), my Internet connection bandwidth is approximately 14 Kbps. I manage everything on my network fairly well, but there are certain things with Exchange 5.5 that I just can't seem to figure out. That's _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Black-hole mailbox
Does it explode or implode?? I think this might be in the FAQ or some Q article... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions You can't clean out a black hole. Stuff goes in and never comes out. But after too much stuff goes in, some theories go, the thing explodes. That's probably where all those messages that have as the sender come from. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nikki Peterson Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Black-hole mailbox Black Hole? Where does the message go? Does this Black hole need to be cleaned out? Nikki _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook connect problem with Exchange Server
If nothing else helps, try removing the TCP/IP protocol and then re-adding it. Even though you can ping OK this sometimes fixes outlook connection problems. Tom -Original Message- From: Niko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi all, I have problem with outlook to access an exchange server I do know how to set outlook up to access an exchange server. I have 30 workstations accessing it now, it is only this one that will not connect. Everytime I hit Check Name I get the error - Outlook could not log on. Check to make sure you are connected to the network and are using the proper server mailbox name. The Microsoft Exchange Address Bool was unable to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. Contact your system administrator if the problem persists. Can ping the Exchange server by name and by IP. Try add winnt\system32\drivers\etc in the HOSTS file give a line for exchange: IP ADDRESSCOMPUTER_NAME Still can't connect System: Windows 2000 Workstation OutlookXP Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 Anyone got another solution? Thanks Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX55: Message processing failed because there is not enough avail able memory
On an exchange 5.5 sp4 server running on win2k, the IMC shut down because the IS complained that: Message processing failed because there is not enough available memory (EVENT ID 12800). This was followed by events 4182 and 4102 (ims shutting down due to serious error i.e. 12800) There was one message in the inbound directory of the IMC and it would not start until I removed that message. There was nothing unusual about that message, it was one that BLAT had generated from a backup process I have scheduled. After that restart, it ran for a while and then choked on two other messages. One was another BLAT message and the third was a MPEG movie somebody had mailed in (probably a funny one, I haven't looked at it). All 3 messages were about 10k bytes in length. MS has a knowledgebase article about this problem: (or something very close) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q325939 Which says: If the Internet Mail Service receives a malformed inbound Internet message, the Internet Mail Service may log event ID 12800, 4182, 4102, and 1001 error messages in the Application event log, and then stop responding. RESOLUTION A supported fix is now available from Microsoft, but it is only intended to correct the problem that is described in this article. Apply it only to computers that are experiencing this specific problem. The fix is a new store.exe version 5.5.2656.60. I am currently running store.exe 5.5.2654.50 (a post sp4 fix). After zapping those 3 emails, the IMC has been running for about an hour now with no problems (and it has never had a problem before). Does anyone have any insight on this problem? If it happens again I will call MS and request the patch, as it is not available for download. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Black-hole mailbox
In exchange 5.5, you can create a distribution list with no members that will act as a black hole. I suspect you might be able to do the same with 2000. Tom -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions In Exchange 5.5 it was easy to create a mailbox that was simply a black-hole. This was done by selecting to forward the mail for that mailbox to an alternate address, but leaving the address field blank. Is this possible in Exchange 2k? If I select the forwarding address option and don't select an address (contact) then it reverts the setting. Anyone know a way to create a black-hole for mail with Exch2K? Thanks, -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX55: problem routing by email domain to multiple mail hosts
On our Exchange 5.5 server we are using DNS for most outbound mail to determine where the message is routed to. We have a VPN link with another division that we use to encrypt emails over the internet. It appears that you can only specify a single address to route the mail to per domain. Is there some way to have it try multiple addresses in the event of a failure? The only thing I can think of is to have our DNS person hard code these special routes into the MX records so we do not end up using the MX records on the root servers. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Argh.... login denied....
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=262054 -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:37 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Argh login denied Subject: Argh login denied I'm looking this up as we speak my service account (exchange god account) is not able to open mailboxes (Unable to open your default e-mail folders...). As far as I can tell, it just started recently (last couple days) so I'm sure something changed... Exchange 2000 sp3. I checked, and it has full control on the mailboxes. It's a member of: domain admins domain users enterprise admins exchange domain servers exchange services schema admins Argh... I'm looking but in the meantime... anyone know what simple little thing I'm missing? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
