RE: Active Directory type tools for NT 4
You can use a tool like LDIFDE to import group memberships, or you can script it. Neither is trivial. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory type tools for NT 4 We are in the process of creating multiple groups to assign printers to. In the past at my last job we had the luxury of AD and using an Excel spreadsheet's to copy the names from the cell's and doing a check to resolve. I am looking for something in NT 4 usrmgr that can do something similar. Anyone have any ideas? It doesn't have to be exactly the same but something so we don't have to pick names 1 at a time because these groups are very large. T hanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
Hey Jazzy, where's the Fresh Prince? _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory When we installed Active Directory, a lot of permission didn't carry over. Has anyone had that problem. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
bum dum, ching! Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Hey Jazzy, where's the Fresh Prince? _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory When we installed Active Directory, a lot of permission didn't carry over. Has anyone had that problem. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
Can you be a little more specifc? What permissions didn't carry over? Carry over from what? Your question is very vague. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Active Directory Subject: Active Directory When we installed Active Directory, a lot of permission didn't carry over. Has anyone had that problem. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
You're moving out with your Auntie and Uncle from Bel Air. _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory When we installed Active Directory, a lot of permission didn't carry over. Has anyone had that problem. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
Some permission that didn't carry over was the Doman Administrators group, helpdesk group, and workgroup managers group. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
What did they not carry over FROM? You haven't told us anything about your environment, whether you just did a migration, what the old environment was, etc. etc. You haven't provided enough info for us to give you any sort of answer. What would you say to one of your users if they came up to you and said Some permissions didn't carry over? You'd likely say something to the effect of I need more info please. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:40 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Active Directory Subject: RE: Active Directory Some permission that didn't carry over was the Doman Administrators group, helpdesk group, and workgroup managers group. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
From where? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Some permission that didn't carry over was the Doman Administrators group, helpdesk group, and workgroup managers group. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
Huh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory When we installed Active Directory, a lot of permission didn't carry over. Has anyone had that problem. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
This happened because you purchased the sports car version of Active Directory, not the Dump Truck version. Only the Dump Truck version will actually carry anything. =) Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Huh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory When we installed Active Directory, a lot of permission didn't carry over. Has anyone had that problem. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question
Is your other server (the one that didn't fail) also a GC? You'll have all sorts of problems if you don't have a live GC anywhere on your network. JC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Schilbach Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question HI Everyone, We are running Ad in our environment with Exchange 2000. We have 2 AD servers in the same site and only 1 server has all FSMO roles (we havent gotten a chance to move them yet). For some reason when one of our DC's failed (the one with all the FSMO roles), our other DC did not accept incomming authentication request, directory lookups, or outlook clients logging into Exchange. I am trying to understand why this issue occurs when we have 2 dircetory servers and exchange is setup to use either of them. DNS is all setup correctly as well and resolves to both servers. I even checked the _ directories under the main DNS and manually verified that all SRV records are in place. Can anyone render an explanation for this? Is it because one server has all the FSMO roles? If so, which roles should I transfer to the other servers? -Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory/Exchange 2000 Failover Question
Hi There, Thank for the reply. Yes it is, but I think I found the answer and the solution. Its documented here: http://www.winnetmag.com/MicrosoftExchangeOutlook/Article/ArticleID/25332/MicrosoftExchangeOutlook_25332.html This did the trick nicely by allowing me to increase the DS auery intervals. I am also using NetIQ now to look at hung threads in the Netlogon service. Technically the server wasnt 'down' but in software failure. I am going to set NetIq to have a threshhold of so many dead threads and then restart the Netlogon service. This can also be accomplished with MOM as well. Thanx all for the support and have a wonderful day -Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Connector
Microsoft actually recommends it a best practice to run Exchange 2003 forestprep/domainprep before installing the Exch2003 ADC. SO your issue is something else. We have done this exact scenario several times in our lab. Actually the lab is one server running VMware GSX, all 6 servers used in the test are virtual, btw this really works well and saves tons of money. Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Connector Anyone know how (or if) you can fix a situation where the ADC was not installed first before ForestPrep and DomainPrep were run? Basically we cannot get the Public Folders to replicate because there's no ability to set up an intersite connection. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Connectors
Mark, I've seen the above document before .. and stuck with one-way CA's after having problems with two-way connections where processing/updating of a large number of objects is involved. In addition to your comment concerning separate CA's, I'd also add that mapping sites/recipients across to OU's on a one-to-one basis CA wise can be beneficial, particularly if you're dealing with a large number of foreign recipients within the 5.5 org. Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 18:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Except that 2 one-way agreements are specifically advised against by MS. As you've obviously seen you can get away with them sometimes (and we have in the past) but I wouldn't actively recommend it especially as it comes up in the MS top ten list of directory service support calls. See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q303180 Go for one-way initially by all means but then turn it into a two-way by checking the appropriate box on the CA. We used separate CAs for MBXs, DLs, CRs to divert them into separate containers. Regarding your original question you will eventually want to repoint your other 55 Site and Directory Replication Connectors at the first sites E2K SRS server, so there's no harm in doing this asap rather than wait for the last server to go. Mark -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors You could replace the single connector with a two-way one but I'd just have separate connection agreements for each way. It's not the most robust (ADC) piece of software in the world and does make troubleshooting a little easier. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors OK, initial one-way from exchange to AD.. Then replace with a two way agreement. This means that all updates to exchange accounts must be done via the ex.5.5? Correct? Ron -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Just a suggestion... Set up one way connectors .. you'll likely save yourself a bit of pain in the process. Perform the synch out of 5.5 into AD first and once happy with the results, create another connection agreement back into the 5.5 environment. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Connectors Have a 5.5 site with two domains (sites) connected via site connector. Getting ready to install the ADC in my site. I will be setting up the two way connection agreement for my site to the Active Directory. I will replace the 1st server in my site after all other servers have been upgraded/replaced. The site connector between both sites should stay intact until I remove the 1st server!! Hopefully!!! At a later date, I plan on upgrading the other site and move them into my domain. We share the GAL so we can see all users. Question: Will I have to do anything with the other site until I get them ready to join my domain? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance
RE: Active Directory Connectors
Fair point. We initially used ldap filters in our CAs to populate particular OUs and as a result had to use a complex mixture of Primary and Secondary one-way CAs. I've now reduced them to non-filtered two-way CAs now that the initial bulk of replication has all happened; largely for ease of support by my colleagues and future exchange/AD admins here. The most useful thing I found was to have a large whiteboard next to my desk with a diagram of all the CAs! This ensured I didn't set up duplicate paths and that all recipients would get replicated. Mark -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 08:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Mark, I've seen the above document before .. and stuck with one-way CA's after having problems with two-way connections where processing/updating of a large number of objects is involved. In addition to your comment concerning separate CA's, I'd also add that mapping sites/recipients across to OU's on a one-to-one basis CA wise can be beneficial, particularly if you're dealing with a large number of foreign recipients within the 5.5 org. Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 18:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Except that 2 one-way agreements are specifically advised against by MS. As you've obviously seen you can get away with them sometimes (and we have in the past) but I wouldn't actively recommend it especially as it comes up in the MS top ten list of directory service support calls. See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q303180 Go for one-way initially by all means but then turn it into a two-way by checking the appropriate box on the CA. We used separate CAs for MBXs, DLs, CRs to divert them into separate containers. Regarding your original question you will eventually want to repoint your other 55 Site and Directory Replication Connectors at the first sites E2K SRS server, so there's no harm in doing this asap rather than wait for the last server to go. Mark -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors You could replace the single connector with a two-way one but I'd just have separate connection agreements for each way. It's not the most robust (ADC) piece of software in the world and does make troubleshooting a little easier. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors OK, initial one-way from exchange to AD.. Then replace with a two way agreement. This means that all updates to exchange accounts must be done via the ex.5.5? Correct? Ron -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Just a suggestion... Set up one way connectors .. you'll likely save yourself a bit of pain in the process. Perform the synch out of 5.5 into AD first and once happy with the results, create another connection agreement back into the 5.5 environment. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Connectors Have a 5.5 site with two domains (sites) connected via site connector. Getting ready to install the ADC in my site. I will be setting up the two way connection agreement for my site to the Active Directory. I will replace the 1st server in my site after all other servers have been upgraded/replaced. The site connector between both sites should stay intact until I remove the 1st server!! Hopefully!!! At a later date, I plan on upgrading the other site and move them into my domain. We share the GAL so we can see all users. Question: Will I have to do anything with the other site until I get them ready to join my domain? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Active Directory Connectors
Yeah.. true.. particular if you're dealing with large numbers of CA's. Being able to map them out to individual OU's is a nice feature, instead of just fire and forget. Been thinking about having a naming convention for CA's so that I don't forget what they did =) Did you map across from Exchange--AD/Windows first in the two-way CA's and then back again (i.e. default)... ? Regards Mylo -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 09:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Fair point. We initially used ldap filters in our CAs to populate particular OUs and as a result had to use a complex mixture of Primary and Secondary one-way CAs. I've now reduced them to non-filtered two-way CAs now that the initial bulk of replication has all happened; largely for ease of support by my colleagues and future exchange/AD admins here. The most useful thing I found was to have a large whiteboard next to my desk with a diagram of all the CAs! This ensured I didn't set up duplicate paths and that all recipients would get replicated. Mark -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 08:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Mark, I've seen the above document before .. and stuck with one-way CA's after having problems with two-way connections where processing/updating of a large number of objects is involved. In addition to your comment concerning separate CA's, I'd also add that mapping sites/recipients across to OU's on a one-to-one basis CA wise can be beneficial, particularly if you're dealing with a large number of foreign recipients within the 5.5 org. Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 18:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Except that 2 one-way agreements are specifically advised against by MS. As you've obviously seen you can get away with them sometimes (and we have in the past) but I wouldn't actively recommend it especially as it comes up in the MS top ten list of directory service support calls. See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q303180 Go for one-way initially by all means but then turn it into a two-way by checking the appropriate box on the CA. We used separate CAs for MBXs, DLs, CRs to divert them into separate containers. Regarding your original question you will eventually want to repoint your other 55 Site and Directory Replication Connectors at the first sites E2K SRS server, so there's no harm in doing this asap rather than wait for the last server to go. Mark -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors You could replace the single connector with a two-way one but I'd just have separate connection agreements for each way. It's not the most robust (ADC) piece of software in the world and does make troubleshooting a little easier. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors OK, initial one-way from exchange to AD.. Then replace with a two way agreement. This means that all updates to exchange accounts must be done via the ex.5.5? Correct? Ron -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Just a suggestion... Set up one way connectors .. you'll likely save yourself a bit of pain in the process. Perform the synch out of 5.5 into AD first and once happy with the results, create another connection agreement back into the 5.5 environment. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Connectors Have a 5.5 site with two domains (sites) connected via site connector. Getting ready to install the ADC in my site. I will be setting up the two way connection agreement for my site to the Active Directory. I will replace the 1st server in my site after all other servers have been upgraded/replaced. The site connector between both sites should stay intact until I remove the 1st server!! Hopefully!!! At a later date, I plan on upgrading the other site and move them into my domain. We share the GAL so we can see all users. Question: Will I have to do anything with the other site until I get them ready to join my domain? Ron _ List
RE: Active Directory Connectors
Here's our naming scheme. Complex but does the job. [T][One/Two]Way[P/S]([Mbx/DL/CR/PF]) [from/btwn] ORG\site (FILTER:filter) [to/and] domain (ou) where [T] = Test (not present if not Test) [One/Two]Way= direction of CA [P/S] = Primary or Secondary (OneWay agreements need one value, TwoWay need two values). [Mbx/DL/CR/PF]= Mailbox/DistributionList/CustomRecpients/PublicFolder CA. [from/btwn] = from if OneWay, btwn if TwoWay ORG\site = Exchange 5.5 Site FILTER:filter = description of any LDAP search filters (use value of Cust Attr 9) * [to/and]= to if OneWay, and if TwoWay domain= target AD domain ou= target ou where relevant N.B. do not edit these CA's using the normal UI - use ldp or ADSIEdit only. If you don't know how to use these tools then don't edit these CA's at all. Did one-way from exchange first. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 09:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Yeah.. true.. particular if you're dealing with large numbers of CA's. Being able to map them out to individual OU's is a nice feature, instead of just fire and forget. Been thinking about having a naming convention for CA's so that I don't forget what they did =) Did you map across from Exchange--AD/Windows first in the two-way CA's and then back again (i.e. default)... ? Regards Mylo -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 09:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Fair point. We initially used ldap filters in our CAs to populate particular OUs and as a result had to use a complex mixture of Primary and Secondary one-way CAs. I've now reduced them to non-filtered two-way CAs now that the initial bulk of replication has all happened; largely for ease of support by my colleagues and future exchange/AD admins here. The most useful thing I found was to have a large whiteboard next to my desk with a diagram of all the CAs! This ensured I didn't set up duplicate paths and that all recipients would get replicated. Mark -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 08:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Mark, I've seen the above document before .. and stuck with one-way CA's after having problems with two-way connections where processing/updating of a large number of objects is involved. In addition to your comment concerning separate CA's, I'd also add that mapping sites/recipients across to OU's on a one-to-one basis CA wise can be beneficial, particularly if you're dealing with a large number of foreign recipients within the 5.5 org. Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 18:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Except that 2 one-way agreements are specifically advised against by MS. As you've obviously seen you can get away with them sometimes (and we have in the past) but I wouldn't actively recommend it especially as it comes up in the MS top ten list of directory service support calls. See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q303180 Go for one-way initially by all means but then turn it into a two-way by checking the appropriate box on the CA. We used separate CAs for MBXs, DLs, CRs to divert them into separate containers. Regarding your original question you will eventually want to repoint your other 55 Site and Directory Replication Connectors at the first sites E2K SRS server, so there's no harm in doing this asap rather than wait for the last server to go. Mark -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors You could replace the single connector with a two-way one but I'd just have separate connection agreements for each way. It's not the most robust (ADC) piece of software in the world and does make troubleshooting a little easier. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors OK, initial one-way from exchange to AD.. Then replace with a two way agreement. This means that all updates to exchange accounts must be done via the ex.5.5? Correct? Ron -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Just a suggestion
RE: Active Directory Connectors
Just a suggestion... Set up one way connectors .. you'll likely save yourself a bit of pain in the process. Perform the synch out of 5.5 into AD first and once happy with the results, create another connection agreement back into the 5.5 environment. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Connectors Have a 5.5 site with two domains (sites) connected via site connector. Getting ready to install the ADC in my site. I will be setting up the two way connection agreement for my site to the Active Directory. I will replace the 1st server in my site after all other servers have been upgraded/replaced. The site connector between both sites should stay intact until I remove the 1st server!! Hopefully!!! At a later date, I plan on upgrading the other site and move them into my domain. We share the GAL so we can see all users. Question: Will I have to do anything with the other site until I get them ready to join my domain? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Connectors
OK, initial one-way from exchange to AD.. Then replace with a two way agreement. This means that all updates to exchange accounts must be done via the ex.5.5? Correct? Ron -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Just a suggestion... Set up one way connectors .. you'll likely save yourself a bit of pain in the process. Perform the synch out of 5.5 into AD first and once happy with the results, create another connection agreement back into the 5.5 environment. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Connectors Have a 5.5 site with two domains (sites) connected via site connector. Getting ready to install the ADC in my site. I will be setting up the two way connection agreement for my site to the Active Directory. I will replace the 1st server in my site after all other servers have been upgraded/replaced. The site connector between both sites should stay intact until I remove the 1st server!! Hopefully!!! At a later date, I plan on upgrading the other site and move them into my domain. We share the GAL so we can see all users. Question: Will I have to do anything with the other site until I get them ready to join my domain? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Connectors
You could replace the single connector with a two-way one but I'd just have separate connection agreements for each way. It's not the most robust (ADC) piece of software in the world and does make troubleshooting a little easier. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors OK, initial one-way from exchange to AD.. Then replace with a two way agreement. This means that all updates to exchange accounts must be done via the ex.5.5? Correct? Ron -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Just a suggestion... Set up one way connectors .. you'll likely save yourself a bit of pain in the process. Perform the synch out of 5.5 into AD first and once happy with the results, create another connection agreement back into the 5.5 environment. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Connectors Have a 5.5 site with two domains (sites) connected via site connector. Getting ready to install the ADC in my site. I will be setting up the two way connection agreement for my site to the Active Directory. I will replace the 1st server in my site after all other servers have been upgraded/replaced. The site connector between both sites should stay intact until I remove the 1st server!! Hopefully!!! At a later date, I plan on upgrading the other site and move them into my domain. We share the GAL so we can see all users. Question: Will I have to do anything with the other site until I get them ready to join my domain? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Connectors
Except that 2 one-way agreements are specifically advised against by MS. As you've obviously seen you can get away with them sometimes (and we have in the past) but I wouldn't actively recommend it especially as it comes up in the MS top ten list of directory service support calls. See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q303180 Go for one-way initially by all means but then turn it into a two-way by checking the appropriate box on the CA. We used separate CAs for MBXs, DLs, CRs to divert them into separate containers. Regarding your original question you will eventually want to repoint your other 55 Site and Directory Replication Connectors at the first sites E2K SRS server, so there's no harm in doing this asap rather than wait for the last server to go. Mark -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors You could replace the single connector with a two-way one but I'd just have separate connection agreements for each way. It's not the most robust (ADC) piece of software in the world and does make troubleshooting a little easier. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors OK, initial one-way from exchange to AD.. Then replace with a two way agreement. This means that all updates to exchange accounts must be done via the ex.5.5? Correct? Ron -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors Just a suggestion... Set up one way connectors .. you'll likely save yourself a bit of pain in the process. Perform the synch out of 5.5 into AD first and once happy with the results, create another connection agreement back into the 5.5 environment. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 May 2002 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Connectors Have a 5.5 site with two domains (sites) connected via site connector. Getting ready to install the ADC in my site. I will be setting up the two way connection agreement for my site to the Active Directory. I will replace the 1st server in my site after all other servers have been upgraded/replaced. The site connector between both sites should stay intact until I remove the 1st server!! Hopefully!!! At a later date, I plan on upgrading the other site and move them into my domain. We share the GAL so we can see all users. Question: Will I have to do anything with the other site until I get them ready to join my domain? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
1) You'll need ESM installed on the second DC to view the Exchange Attributes in ADUC. 2) prior to running the upgrade, could you see the 55 server in the configuration naming context container in AD? A config connection agreement will need to be running for this info to replicate into AD and an SRS running on the first E2K server. You did install the Exchange ADC I hope (SP2 version preferred). Also it is not clear whether you have already upgraded another E55 server to 2K. Mark -Original Message- From: Steve Van Eck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 February 2002 16:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory I am in the middle of an Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade and have a few problems. 1. I have an ADC on the Domain Controller that holds all Master Roles. I can view Exchange attributes for all users in Active Directory Users and Computers. But if I look in Active Directory Users and Computers on a second Controller, I can not view these attributes. I have forced replication between these controllers and still am unable to view on the second Domain Controller. ViewAdvanced Features is enabled. 2. I have built another Exchange 5.5 server and added it to the existing Exchange Site. When I try to upgrade this server to Exchange 2000, I receive an error message that the Exchange 5.5 site and the Active Directory Exchange site have different names. All of my problems seem to relate to Active Directory. Is it possible to remove the Exchange Schema from AD and reinstall it? Thanks for your help, Steve _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory
Yes, you can remove everything, and there's a KB article to tell you how. But I don't know what the number is. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Van Eck Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory I am in the middle of an Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade and have a few problems. 1. I have an ADC on the Domain Controller that holds all Master Roles. I can view Exchange attributes for all users in Active Directory Users and Computers. But if I look in Active Directory Users and Computers on a second Controller, I can not view these attributes. I have forced replication between these controllers and still am unable to view on the second Domain Controller. ViewAdvanced Features is enabled. 2. I have built another Exchange 5.5 server and added it to the existing Exchange Site. When I try to upgrade this server to Exchange 2000, I receive an error message that the Exchange 5.5 site and the Active Directory Exchange site have different names. All of my problems seem to relate to Active Directory. Is it possible to remove the Exchange Schema from AD and reinstall it? Thanks for your help, Steve _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info!
Were you using a machine that has the Exchange administrative tools installed? You are aware that if you use, say a domain controller, that doesn't have them installed you won't see the Exchange attributes, right? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fred W. Macondray Jr. Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info! I went to remove an email address for myself, so Exchange wouldn't intercept email destined for my cell phone and place it in my Inbox, only to find that for all users all the Exchange related menu's and dialogs were gone. It was as though Exchange had never been installed on the domain! Perhaps it was a Halloween ghost :o Thanks Fred _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info!
Sorry for the alarm. I rebooted my Exchange server and the menu's are back! What could cause such strange behavior? I was fearing the worst! Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info! Help!!! I just now went to AD to delete one of my valid email addresses only to find that all integration with AD, the Exchange Tasks and the EMail tab, are GONE !?! I just performed a bunch of these actions yesterday, but today their not available :( What could cause this? I'm only seeing a couple of warnings about being able to replicate the database. Thanks in Advance, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - Guaranteed B2B Purchases _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info!
AHa you got it strange behavior = Micosoft software Rgds, -ER -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info! Sorry for the alarm. I rebooted my Exchange server and the menu's are back! What could cause such strange behavior? I was fearing the worst! Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info! Help!!! I just now went to AD to delete one of my valid email addresses only to find that all integration with AD, the Exchange Tasks and the EMail tab, are GONE !?! I just performed a bunch of these actions yesterday, but today their not available :( What could cause this? I'm only seeing a couple of warnings about being able to replicate the database. Thanks in Advance, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - Guaranteed B2B Purchases _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info!
I went to remove an email address for myself, so Exchange wouldn't intercept email destined for my cell phone and place it in my Inbox, only to find that for all users all the Exchange related menu's and dialogs were gone. It was as though Exchange had never been installed on the domain! Perhaps it was a Halloween ghost :o Thanks Fred -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info! Not enough information for me to speculate. -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info! Sorry for the alarm. I rebooted my Exchange server and the menu's are back! What could cause such strange behavior? I was fearing the worst! Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info! Help!!! I just now went to AD to delete one of my valid email addresses only to find that all integration with AD, the Exchange Tasks and the EMail tab, are GONE !?! I just performed a bunch of these actions yesterday, but today their not available :( What could cause this? I'm only seeing a couple of warnings about being able to replicate the database. Thanks in Advance, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - Guaranteed B2B Purchases _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info!
strange behavior = Micosoft software = Reboot usually fixes everything -Original Message- From: Romero, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info! AHa you got it strange behavior = Micosoft software Rgds, -ER -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info! Sorry for the alarm. I rebooted my Exchange server and the menu's are back! What could cause such strange behavior? I was fearing the worst! Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info! Help!!! I just now went to AD to delete one of my valid email addresses only to find that all integration with AD, the Exchange Tasks and the EMail tab, are GONE !?! I just performed a bunch of these actions yesterday, but today their not available :( What could cause this? I'm only seeing a couple of warnings about being able to replicate the database. Thanks in Advance, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - Guaranteed B2B Purchases _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
