RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Which FAQ would that be? Oh, maybe you mean this one? http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec4.htm 4.2 Q: Looking for a FAX server? (Funny enough, Section 4 is entitled Third Party Add-ons_ -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance This topic should be on the FAQ's. I see it a few times a month. I've even asked it before hehe. The same folks say the same thing too (thanks for sharing btw.) J -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:45 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Any Exchange-connected fax product can receive faxes and forward them to a designated Exchange mailbox. I don't know if WinFax Pro has this ability or not. We use Faxination (www.faxination.com). GFI's Faxmaker would work also and is probably less expensive. With each you also have the ability to send faxes from client machines. That may not be one of your requirements but it is an significant productivity booster. I have Visioneer Strobe scanners on each desktop and being able to scan and send saves a lot of time for the users. All sending and receiving is handled through Outlook. Roger Wright Southern Commerce Bank ___ Too much of everything is just enough. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:44 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron -- You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ___ NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 456.057 and 395.3025. It is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message. -- You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% -- You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Winfax pro is pretty cheap around $100 I think. Not sure if it automatically will forward it however. If not I am sure it wouldn't take much to write a program to do it for you. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Checked into that one... Unfortunately it either forwards as a property format and a viewer needs to be installed, or it forwards as a self-viewing file (exe) which outlook and Antigen both choke on. I would like the faxes to be TIF or even better, PDF. Aaron -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Winfax pro is pretty cheap around $100 I think. Not sure if it automatically will forward it however. If not I am sure it wouldn't take much to write a program to do it for you. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Are you running Exchange 2000 or Exchange 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
5.5 -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Are you running Exchange 2000 or Exchange 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
$20 -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like that in that price range. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like that in that price range. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax. But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like 850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for... You better research this a bit more. Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable. First you will need a fax card (forget the modem thing , it does not work reliably..I wont get into the tech about it all) but a Brooktrout analog 2 channel cheapest is like 500.00 then from there If your really good with code you could wrtie something up..you could do the open soft of the fax software that run's on unix (i forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago). Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...) bill -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Thanks Bill. Good info. Looks like we'll stick with a traditional fax. I'm going to check out Panafax. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax. But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like 850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for... You better research this a bit more. Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable. First you will need a fax card (forget the modem thing , it does not work reliably..I wont get into the tech about it all) but a Brooktrout analog 2 channel cheapest is like 500.00 then from there If your really good with code you could wrtie something up..you could do the open soft of the fax software that run's on unix (i forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago). Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...) bill -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
P.S. even if you had the whole fax thing to exchange etc...you always need a good fax machine. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Thanks Bill. Good info. Looks like we'll stick with a traditional fax. I'm going to check out Panafax. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax. But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like 850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for... You better research this a bit more. Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable. First you will need a fax card (forget the modem thing , it does not work reliably..I wont get into the tech about it all) but a Brooktrout analog 2 channel cheapest is like 500.00 then from there If your really good with code you could wrtie something up..you could do the open soft of the fax software that run's on unix (i forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago). Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...) bill -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
We do a TON of faxing. I have fax servers and about 6 fax machines for 70 users. They are always all busy. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like that in that price range. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Thanks. I still planned to keep our main fax. We currently have two. One is dedicated to incoming and the other is for sending and overflow incoming. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance P.S. even if you had the whole fax thing to exchange etc...you always need a good fax machine. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Thanks Bill. Good info. Looks like we'll stick with a traditional fax. I'm going to check out Panafax. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax. But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like 850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for... You better research this a bit more. Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable. First you will need a fax card (forget the modem thing , it does not work reliably..I wont get into the tech about it all) but a Brooktrout analog 2 channel cheapest is like 500.00 then from there If your really good with code you could wrtie something up..you could do the open soft of the fax software that run's on unix (i forget the name, check a linux mag art's about 6 month ago). Reliability cost money, for my 100 some odd users it paid off all 20K of it(that's lot of hardware and all faxiantion softlic..etc...) bill -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Im with Martin It basically depends on what you do. Ive got 2 DID trunks(120 numbers), 16 analog lines into the fax server stand alone fax machines well over 25 2 fax machines for 100 people..wow it would seem like too few to me. then do yourself the favor buy the best unit you can casue when one fails your capacity is down 50% in uor business that would cost us huge.. bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance We do a TON of faxing. I have fax servers and about 6 fax machines for 70 users. They are always all busy. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like that in that price range. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
He drives a Hummer too -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like that in that price range. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Same with ours. A single lost fax could cost us thousands of dollars. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Im with Martin It basically depends on what you do. Ive got 2 DID trunks(120 numbers), 16 analog lines into the fax server stand alone fax machines well over 25 2 fax machines for 100 people..wow it would seem like too few to me. then do yourself the favor buy the best unit you can casue when one fails your capacity is down 50% in uor business that would cost us huge.. bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance We do a TON of faxing. I have fax servers and about 6 fax machines for 70 users. They are always all busy. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like that in that price range. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
No I don't, but enjoy one from time to time. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance He drives a Hummer too -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like that in that price range. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
If you are really low volume (under 20-50 faxes a month), try www.efax.com You lose a little in-house control, but the service is reliable (I have used it for over a year without issue) and affordable. Regards, Danny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
This topic should be on the FAQ's. I see it a few times a month. I've even asked it before hehe. The same folks say the same thing too (thanks for sharing btw.) J -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:45 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Any Exchange-connected fax product can receive faxes and forward them to a designated Exchange mailbox. I don't know if WinFax Pro has this ability or not. We use Faxination (www.faxination.com). GFI's Faxmaker would work also and is probably less expensive. With each you also have the ability to send faxes from client machines. That may not be one of your requirements but it is an significant productivity booster. I have Visioneer Strobe scanners on each desktop and being able to scan and send saves a lot of time for the users. All sending and receiving is handled through Outlook. Roger Wright Southern Commerce Bank ___ Too much of everything is just enough. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:44 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron -- You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ___ NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic message is considered privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 456.057 and 395.3025. It is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above. If the reader is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message. -- You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% -- You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
Note: on this solution...You will need to load the E-fax client software also read their aggrement..I seem to remember it has some features to it... 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Nunez, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance If you are really low volume (under 20-50 faxes a month), try www.efax.com You lose a little in-house control, but the service is reliable (I have used it for over a year without issue) and affordable. Regards, Danny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could do this for us... Receive a fax and forward it to a single email address. If anyone has ever seen such a device or you have any other suggestions, please let me know. TIA, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
Does Faxination support tracking account codes? -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I have used Fenestrae's Faxination and it worked great. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
yes though I do not use it (well ok I kind'a used it once to do some routing with it) -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Does Faxination support tracking account codes? -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I have used Fenestrae's Faxination and it worked great. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
From http://www.icon-plc.co.uk/Faxination/feature_list.htm Cost Manager The Faxination Cost Manager allows you to actively monitor and control fax costs. Review fax usage per destination, per user or per department. Whatever that means :) Paul -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Does Faxination support tracking account codes? -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I have used Fenestrae's Faxination and it worked great. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
I have used Fenestrae's Faxination and it worked great. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
Faxination's a great one for the Enterprise level. Another good one is Message Manager from www.syssol.com.au which we've just implemented. It's does everything faxination does and also delivers inbound faxes to a network share, which was the reason we chose one over the other (we've got a requirement to bring 10,000 faxes per week into an image workflow solution as well as the normal exchange based inbound outbound) -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I have used Fenestrae's Faxination and it worked great. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
Mark, Good to know about Message Manager moving over the images to a network share. I wrote a script on the exchange server so that once it came in it would move the image to a network share based on the fax number it was sent to. Brett -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Faxination's a great one for the Enterprise level. Another good one is Message Manager from www.syssol.com.au which we've just implemented. It's does everything faxination does and also delivers inbound faxes to a network share, which was the reason we chose one over the other (we've got a requirement to bring 10,000 faxes per week into an image workflow solution as well as the normal exchange based inbound outbound) -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I have used Fenestrae's Faxination and it worked great. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
we originally installed rightfax ver. 7.0 and have since upgraded to 8.0 It has been one of the easiest things to install/maintain and we are running exch. 5.5 -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Anybody using a faxing product with there Exchange Server? I'm reviewing Captaris Right Fax and GFI FAXMaker. Anybody have any positive/negative feedback on either of these products? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange
OMTOOL Used FaxSr in a VAX/VMS environment (yes, they ported it to NT). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-103735;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange Okay... I've reread what I sent and I think I gave everyone the wrong impression. As far as I know Omnitool is still around, still doing business etc. The company that went poof is the company that I worked for at the time VANSTAR/INACOM. This is the company that is just a case file in the bankruptcy court. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax Sr. on Exchange Most Fax companies are in the same boat as far as I am concerned with advancements in messaging . That's too bad about them though. I liked the Rhino logo they used to have. - Original Message - From: John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:45 AM Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange All the fax cards were supported. Each was 4 port card I believe. All the cards were brought up to the same revision of microcode and all the variables on the server were kept to a minimum. But, like I said, one machine ran just fine, the other was in constant need of attention. But it's all a moot point from my point of view since the company no longer exists, except as a case file in the bowels of the bankruptcy court in Delaware. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange Did you have different fax cards? Like Brooktrout vs something else? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange We had two installations of Fax Sr. in two different sites, same organization. One installation ran hands off, just fine, no problems. The other took spoon feeding, braces, crutches and three helpers to walk. Trying to get technical support from the manufacturer was a joke. Even calls to the VP and President of the company went unanswered. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:DPSebast;uop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Sr. on Exchange I would be interested if anybody has installed Fax Sr in an Exchange 5.5 environment. If they have had any issues with installation and/or configuration of Fax Sr when running with Exchange. Thanks, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange
Wow. Long time ago. At Credit Suisse. Can't remember any details any more. Maybe if you gave me some truth serum :) -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:DPSebast;uop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Sr. on Exchange I would be interested if anybody has installed Fax Sr in an Exchange 5.5 environment. If they have had any issues with installation and/or configuration of Fax Sr when running with Exchange. Thanks, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fax Sr. on Exchange
Works great and less filling too. - Original Message - From: Sebastian, Didy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 10:59 AM Subject: Fax Sr. on Exchange I would be interested if anybody has installed Fax Sr in an Exchange 5.5 environment. If they have had any issues with installation and/or configuration of Fax Sr when running with Exchange. Thanks, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange
Does anyone remember RightFax on MS Mail? :) -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange A couple of years ago, yes. Nothing recent. My experience then was that the connector was easy to install - no problems. The tricky part was working out the necessary permissions for the Fax server. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:DPSebast;uop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Sr. on Exchange I would be interested if anybody has installed Fax Sr in an Exchange 5.5 environment. If they have had any issues with installation and/or configuration of Fax Sr when running with Exchange. Thanks, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange
We had two installations of Fax Sr. in two different sites, same organization. One installation ran hands off, just fine, no problems. The other took spoon feeding, braces, crutches and three helpers to walk. Trying to get technical support from the manufacturer was a joke. Even calls to the VP and President of the company went unanswered. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:DPSebast;uop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Sr. on Exchange I would be interested if anybody has installed Fax Sr in an Exchange 5.5 environment. If they have had any issues with installation and/or configuration of Fax Sr when running with Exchange. Thanks, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange
We use it in conjunction with a third party app and it runs pretty well. Every once in a while it brings my server to a crawl and a stop and start of its services clears it up. I have to agree with John, don't rely on their support and hope it works right out of the box. We had two installations of Fax Sr. in two different sites, same organization. One installation ran hands off, just fine, no problems. The other took spoon feeding, braces, crutches and three helpers to walk. Trying to get technical support from the manufacturer was a joke. Even calls to the VP and President of the company went unanswered. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:DPSebast;uop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Sr. on Exchange I would be interested if anybody has installed Fax Sr in an Exchange 5.5 environment. If they have had any issues with installation and/or configuration of Fax Sr when running with Exchange. Thanks, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fax Sr. on Exchange
I never had a problem with it. but then again that was years ago and they offered training on it that brought up concerns not it the manuals. Tech. support was good when I used them. Could be they are like everybody else these days. Have had to cut staff during tough times, so guess where heads fall first sometimes. - Original Message - From: Scott Force [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:41 PM Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange We use it in conjunction with a third party app and it runs pretty well. Every once in a while it brings my server to a crawl and a stop and start of its services clears it up. I have to agree with John, don't rely on their support and hope it works right out of the box. We had two installations of Fax Sr. in two different sites, same organization. One installation ran hands off, just fine, no problems. The other took spoon feeding, braces, crutches and three helpers to walk. Trying to get technical support from the manufacturer was a joke. Even calls to the VP and President of the company went unanswered. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:DPSebast;uop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Sr. on Exchange I would be interested if anybody has installed Fax Sr in an Exchange 5.5 environment. If they have had any issues with installation and/or configuration of Fax Sr when running with Exchange. Thanks, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange
Did you have different fax cards? Like Brooktrout vs something else? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange We had two installations of Fax Sr. in two different sites, same organization. One installation ran hands off, just fine, no problems. The other took spoon feeding, braces, crutches and three helpers to walk. Trying to get technical support from the manufacturer was a joke. Even calls to the VP and President of the company went unanswered. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:DPSebast;uop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Sr. on Exchange I would be interested if anybody has installed Fax Sr in an Exchange 5.5 environment. If they have had any issues with installation and/or configuration of Fax Sr when running with Exchange. Thanks, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange
Is that still the case with Genifax, which appears to be the replacement for Fax Sr? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:list;heritagebuildinggroup.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange We use it in conjunction with a third party app and it runs pretty well. Every once in a while it brings my server to a crawl and a stop and start of its services clears it up. I have to agree with John, don't rely on their support and hope it works right out of the box. We had two installations of Fax Sr. in two different sites, same organization. One installation ran hands off, just fine, no problems. The other took spoon feeding, braces, crutches and three helpers to walk. Trying to get technical support from the manufacturer was a joke. Even calls to the VP and President of the company went unanswered. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:DPSebast;uop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Sr. on Exchange I would be interested if anybody has installed Fax Sr in an Exchange 5.5 environment. If they have had any issues with installation and/or configuration of Fax Sr when running with Exchange. Thanks, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fax Sr. on Exchange
That's right I remember them being very picky at the time of whose fax/modems you were allowed to use. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:31 PM Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange Did you have different fax cards? Like Brooktrout vs something else? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange We had two installations of Fax Sr. in two different sites, same organization. One installation ran hands off, just fine, no problems. The other took spoon feeding, braces, crutches and three helpers to walk. Trying to get technical support from the manufacturer was a joke. Even calls to the VP and President of the company went unanswered. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:DPSebast;uop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Sr. on Exchange I would be interested if anybody has installed Fax Sr in an Exchange 5.5 environment. If they have had any issues with installation and/or configuration of Fax Sr when running with Exchange. Thanks, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
Have you tried entering {fax number}@netmoves.com in the fax number field?
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fax
Hi,
I have noticed that if I have a contact which has its e-mail address
field and Fax field entered, it will show up 2 choices. Name Surname
(E-Mail) and Name Surname (Business Fax).
I guess the idea is to send an e-mail directly to the guy's fax
machine...
We use the Netmoves fax service, where we basically compose an e-mail
with the text/attachments that we want to come out of the recipients fax
machine, and we send it to [RECIPIENT_FAX_NUMBER]@netmoves.com.
Netmoves converts this to a standard fax and sends it to the fax number
as specified in the userid portion of the e-mail address.
Can we use this Outlook/Exchange feature which brings up this Name
Surname (Business Fax) to automatically send it to
[BUSINESS_FAX]@netmoves.com?
Andrea Coppini
+356 79 ANDREA (263732)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND
iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new
businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and
Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US.
The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari
Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA
Advisory Network.
www.iWG.info
www.countryprofiler.com/iWG
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not
the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to
such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you
should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
This email and its contents are confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose
or use the information within this email or its
attachments. If you have received this email in error,
please delete it immediately. Thank you.
===
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
For 7 faxes a year you can walk to a Kinko's. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax For a whoppin 7 faxes a year, I wouldn't do anything beyond WinFax. I might even be inclined to use the Symantec Fax program that comes with W2K... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I am not looking for anything fancy. I just want the ability to fax out of Outlook and receive faxes. I get about 2 per year and I send about 5 per year. I was hoping to not spend any money if I dont have to. I may have to look to something like WinFax. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig Sent: Thu 11/15/2001 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Fax Oh, one other thing. If someone on the outside of your company is sophisticated enough to be able to handle supplemental DTMF addressing to cause an inbound fax arriving at your Exchange Server to be properly routed, then that person will have access to a digital route, which basically means that inbound automatic routing can work, but no one is ever going to use it. You can buy the technology, but that does not make it worthwhile. Inbound will have to be manually forwarded. Fax really is an obsolete technology that is probably less useful than an Underwood. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses) Can Exchange act as a fax server? Not exactly. Fax's can be transported by SMTP as a registered MIME type. This of course makes the server blind to the content, and means that it can be a client issue. However, Exchange Server can also have a FAX service or connector installed. This enables the server itself to drive a modem or high grade telephony board to either directly send or receive faxes. Outbound, MAPI clients (i.e. Outlook) or OWA clients can send to a fax recipient using ad hoc addressing, once the FAX address type has been created by adding such a service. Of course, permanent fax addressees can be stored in the AD/GAL or the PAB/CL. Inbound, is a little trickier. If the inbound fax has some DTMF supplemental addressing that maps (insert magic box here) to an AD/GAL addressee, then the MTA can deliver it. Alternately, they can be routed to a specific printer, or a specific secretarial addressee for manual forwarding. Several vendors make one of these combination fax connector and magic box servers for Exchange. Microsoft Fax is a client tool. It is not Exchange Server aware. It's been awhile since I looked at it, but if it can save a document as a fax file, then presumably this could be attached to a mail message and the proper MIME type would get applied. But as the EG's said, this would be lame beyond belief or any human comprehension. Usually people are interested in transmitting digital data and getting non-digital data into some sort of intelligible format. To take a perfectly good digital document, then store it as a useless piece of raster junk, and then send it as an SMTP attachment to someone that has some sort of a junky raster-only printer, well, that would be sad. So it is hard to imagine a scenario in which someone would want to spend money integrating MS Fax to an e-mail service. The right way to leverage MS Fax is in a scenario in which you have a requirement for a small number of users to send or receive Faxes, but can't cost justify the incremental cost of something like OmTool for Exchange over the cost of some personal modems. Some organizations are going to be in a bind with this. Most good enterprise security policies prohibit using a personal modem to link to an external connection while at the same time being connected to the enterprise network. Obviously, something like OmTool solves this problem, but that does not make the cost story any prettier. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Can Exchange act as a Fax Server? Does it integrate with MS Fax? I want to be able to Fax out
RE: Fax
FAX is useful for communicating to folks who have a phone link, but not one reliable enough for internet connection. Or, they have a phone but no computer. Or, you need to exchange documents which must be signed - the legal community accepts faxes of signed documents. Electronic signatures are not generally acceptable, yet. Darcy -Original Message- From: kim cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax no and no. who faxes anymore, anyway? what are those people, Amish? [1] [1] oh, keep yer lids on. i'm totally joking, of course. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Can Exchange act as a Fax Server? Does it integrate with MS Fax? I want to be able to Fax out of Outlook, but I want to avoid buying something like winfax. Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.domitianx.com Master Of The Spoon People Keeper Of None _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses) Can Exchange act as a fax server? Not exactly. Fax's can be transported by SMTP as a registered MIME type. This of course makes the server blind to the content, and means that it can be a client issue. However, Exchange Server can also have a FAX service or connector installed. This enables the server itself to drive a modem or high grade telephony board to either directly send or receive faxes. Outbound, MAPI clients (i.e. Outlook) or OWA clients can send to a fax recipient using ad hoc addressing, once the FAX address type has been created by adding such a service. Of course, permanent fax addressees can be stored in the AD/GAL or the PAB/CL. Inbound, is a little trickier. If the inbound fax has some DTMF supplemental addressing that maps (insert magic box here) to an AD/GAL addressee, then the MTA can deliver it. Alternately, they can be routed to a specific printer, or a specific secretarial addressee for manual forwarding. Several vendors make one of these combination fax connector and magic box servers for Exchange. Microsoft Fax is a client tool. It is not Exchange Server aware. It's been awhile since I looked at it, but if it can save a document as a fax file, then presumably this could be attached to a mail message and the proper MIME type would get applied. But as the EG's said, this would be lame beyond belief or any human comprehension. Usually people are interested in transmitting digital data and getting non-digital data into some sort of intelligible format. To take a perfectly good digital document, then store it as a useless piece of raster junk, and then send it as an SMTP attachment to someone that has some sort of a junky raster-only printer, well, that would be sad. So it is hard to imagine a scenario in which someone would want to spend money integrating MS Fax to an e-mail service. The right way to leverage MS Fax is in a scenario in which you have a requirement for a small number of users to send or receive Faxes, but can't cost justify the incremental cost of something like OmTool for Exchange over the cost of some personal modems. Some organizations are going to be in a bind with this. Most good enterprise security policies prohibit using a personal modem to link to an external connection while at the same time being connected to the enterprise network. Obviously, something like OmTool solves this problem, but that does not make the cost story any prettier. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Can Exchange act as a Fax Server? Does it integrate with MS Fax? I want to be able to Fax out of Outlook, but I want to avoid buying something like winfax. Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.domitianx.com Master Of The Spoon People Keeper Of None _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
Oh, one other thing. If someone on the outside of your company is sophisticated enough to be able to handle supplemental DTMF addressing to cause an inbound fax arriving at your Exchange Server to be properly routed, then that person will have access to a digital route, which basically means that inbound automatic routing can work, but no one is ever going to use it. You can buy the technology, but that does not make it worthwhile. Inbound will have to be manually forwarded. Fax really is an obsolete technology that is probably less useful than an Underwood. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses) Can Exchange act as a fax server? Not exactly. Fax's can be transported by SMTP as a registered MIME type. This of course makes the server blind to the content, and means that it can be a client issue. However, Exchange Server can also have a FAX service or connector installed. This enables the server itself to drive a modem or high grade telephony board to either directly send or receive faxes. Outbound, MAPI clients (i.e. Outlook) or OWA clients can send to a fax recipient using ad hoc addressing, once the FAX address type has been created by adding such a service. Of course, permanent fax addressees can be stored in the AD/GAL or the PAB/CL. Inbound, is a little trickier. If the inbound fax has some DTMF supplemental addressing that maps (insert magic box here) to an AD/GAL addressee, then the MTA can deliver it. Alternately, they can be routed to a specific printer, or a specific secretarial addressee for manual forwarding. Several vendors make one of these combination fax connector and magic box servers for Exchange. Microsoft Fax is a client tool. It is not Exchange Server aware. It's been awhile since I looked at it, but if it can save a document as a fax file, then presumably this could be attached to a mail message and the proper MIME type would get applied. But as the EG's said, this would be lame beyond belief or any human comprehension. Usually people are interested in transmitting digital data and getting non-digital data into some sort of intelligible format. To take a perfectly good digital document, then store it as a useless piece of raster junk, and then send it as an SMTP attachment to someone that has some sort of a junky raster-only printer, well, that would be sad. So it is hard to imagine a scenario in which someone would want to spend money integrating MS Fax to an e-mail service. The right way to leverage MS Fax is in a scenario in which you have a requirement for a small number of users to send or receive Faxes, but can't cost justify the incremental cost of something like OmTool for Exchange over the cost of some personal modems. Some organizations are going to be in a bind with this. Most good enterprise security policies prohibit using a personal modem to link to an external connection while at the same time being connected to the enterprise network. Obviously, something like OmTool solves this problem, but that does not make the cost story any prettier. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Can Exchange act as a Fax Server? Does it integrate with MS Fax? I want to be able to Fax out of Outlook, but I want to avoid buying something like winfax. Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.domitianx.com Master Of The Spoon People Keeper Of None _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax
I am not looking for anything fancy. I just want the ability to fax out of Outlook and receive faxes. I get about 2 per year and I send about 5 per year. I was hoping to not spend any money if I dont have to. I may have to look to something like WinFax. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig Sent: Thu 11/15/2001 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Fax Oh, one other thing. If someone on the outside of your company is sophisticated enough to be able to handle supplemental DTMF addressing to cause an inbound fax arriving at your Exchange Server to be properly routed, then that person will have access to a digital route, which basically means that inbound automatic routing can work, but no one is ever going to use it. You can buy the technology, but that does not make it worthwhile. Inbound will have to be manually forwarded. Fax really is an obsolete technology that is probably less useful than an Underwood. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses) Can Exchange act as a fax server? Not exactly. Fax's can be transported by SMTP as a registered MIME type. This of course makes the server blind to the content, and means that it can be a client issue. However, Exchange Server can also have a FAX service or connector installed. This enables the server itself to drive a modem or high grade telephony board to either directly send or receive faxes. Outbound, MAPI clients (i.e. Outlook) or OWA clients can send to a fax recipient using ad hoc addressing, once the FAX address type has been created by adding such a service. Of course, permanent fax addressees can be stored in the AD/GAL or the PAB/CL. Inbound, is a little trickier. If the inbound fax has some DTMF supplemental addressing that maps (insert magic box here) to an AD/GAL addressee, then the MTA can deliver it. Alternately, they can be routed to a specific printer, or a specific secretarial addressee for manual forwarding. Several vendors make one of these combination fax connector and magic box servers for Exchange. Microsoft Fax is a client tool. It is not Exchange Server aware. It's been awhile since I looked at it, but if it can save a document as a fax file, then presumably this could be attached to a mail message and the proper MIME type would get applied. But as the EG's said, this would be lame beyond belief or any human comprehension. Usually people are interested in transmitting digital data and getting non-digital data into some sort of intelligible format. To take a perfectly good digital document, then store it as a useless piece of raster junk, and then send it as an SMTP attachment to someone that has some sort of a junky raster-only printer, well, that would be sad. So it is hard to imagine a scenario in which someone would want to spend money integrating MS Fax to an e-mail service. The right way to leverage MS Fax is in a scenario in which you have a requirement for a small number of users to send or receive Faxes, but can't cost justify the incremental cost of something like OmTool for Exchange over the cost of some personal modems. Some organizations are going to be in a bind with this. Most good enterprise security policies prohibit using a personal modem to link to an external connection while at the same time being connected to the enterprise network. Obviously, something like OmTool solves this problem, but that does not make the cost story any prettier. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Can Exchange act as a Fax Server? Does it integrate with MS Fax? I want to be able to Fax out of Outlook, but I want to avoid buying something like winfax. Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.domitianx.com Master Of The Spoon People Keeper Of None
RE: Fax
For a whoppin 7 faxes a year, I wouldn't do anything beyond WinFax. I might even be inclined to use the Symantec Fax program that comes with W2K... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I am not looking for anything fancy. I just want the ability to fax out of Outlook and receive faxes. I get about 2 per year and I send about 5 per year. I was hoping to not spend any money if I dont have to. I may have to look to something like WinFax. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig Sent: Thu 11/15/2001 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Fax Oh, one other thing. If someone on the outside of your company is sophisticated enough to be able to handle supplemental DTMF addressing to cause an inbound fax arriving at your Exchange Server to be properly routed, then that person will have access to a digital route, which basically means that inbound automatic routing can work, but no one is ever going to use it. You can buy the technology, but that does not make it worthwhile. Inbound will have to be manually forwarded. Fax really is an obsolete technology that is probably less useful than an Underwood. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses) Can Exchange act as a fax server? Not exactly. Fax's can be transported by SMTP as a registered MIME type. This of course makes the server blind to the content, and means that it can be a client issue. However, Exchange Server can also have a FAX service or connector installed. This enables the server itself to drive a modem or high grade telephony board to either directly send or receive faxes. Outbound, MAPI clients (i.e. Outlook) or OWA clients can send to a fax recipient using ad hoc addressing, once the FAX address type has been created by adding such a service. Of course, permanent fax addressees can be stored in the AD/GAL or the PAB/CL. Inbound, is a little trickier. If the inbound fax has some DTMF supplemental addressing that maps (insert magic box here) to an AD/GAL addressee, then the MTA can deliver it. Alternately, they can be routed to a specific printer, or a specific secretarial addressee for manual forwarding. Several vendors make one of these combination fax connector and magic box servers for Exchange. Microsoft Fax is a client tool. It is not Exchange Server aware. It's been awhile since I looked at it, but if it can save a document as a fax file, then presumably this could be attached to a mail message and the proper MIME type would get applied. But as the EG's said, this would be lame beyond belief or any human comprehension. Usually people are interested in transmitting digital data and getting non-digital data into some sort of intelligible format. To take a perfectly good digital document, then store it as a useless piece of raster junk, and then send it as an SMTP attachment to someone that has some sort of a junky raster-only printer, well, that would be sad. So it is hard to imagine a scenario in which someone would want to spend money integrating MS Fax to an e-mail service. The right way to leverage MS Fax is in a scenario in which you have a requirement for a small number of users to send or receive Faxes, but can't cost justify the incremental cost of something like OmTool for Exchange over the cost of some personal modems. Some organizations are going to be in a bind with this. Most good enterprise security policies prohibit using a personal modem to link to an external connection while at the same time being connected to the enterprise network. Obviously, something like OmTool solves this problem, but that does not make the cost story any prettier. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fax Can Exchange act as a Fax Server? Does it integrate with MS Fax? I want to be able to Fax out of Outlook, but I want to avoid buying something like winfax. Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.domitianx.com
RE: Fax
For receiving faxes, consider jfax (http://www.j2.com/index.asp). Receiving is free, you get your own fax number, faxes get emailed to you. They do sending, too, for a minor fee--something like $4.95 a month, plus per minute charges. The free fax receive works great--I've used it for the last year or two, no problem. I haven't used their send fax service, so I can't tell you about that. It's not integrated with Exchange, but you do get faxes via email, and it really really works! Doesn't sound like you really need integration, anyway. Rob -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I am not looking for anything fancy. I just want the ability to fax out of Outlook and receive faxes. I get about 2 per year and I send about 5 per year. I was hoping to not spend any money if I dont have to. I may have to look to something like WinFax. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig Sent: Thu 11/15/2001 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Fax Oh, one other thing. If someone on the outside of your company is sophisticated enough to be able to handle supplemental DTMF addressing to cause an inbound fax arriving at your Exchange Server to be properly routed, then that person will have access to a digital route, which basically means that inbound automatic routing can work, but no one is ever going to use it. You can buy the technology, but that does not make it worthwhile. Inbound will have to be manually forwarded. Fax really is an obsolete technology that is probably less useful than an Underwood. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses) Can Exchange act as a fax server? Not exactly. Fax's can be transported by SMTP as a registered MIME type. This of course makes the server blind to the content, and means that it can be a client issue. However, Exchange Server can also have a FAX service or connector installed. This enables the server itself to drive a modem or high grade telephony board to either directly send or receive faxes. Outbound, MAPI clients (i.e. Outlook) or OWA clients can send to a fax recipient using ad hoc addressing, once the FAX address type has been created by adding such a service. Of course, permanent fax addressees can be stored in the AD/GAL or the PAB/CL. Inbound, is a little trickier. If the inbound fax has some DTMF supplemental addressing that maps (insert magic box here) to an AD/GAL addressee, then the MTA can deliver it. Alternately, they can be routed to a specific printer, or a specific secretarial addressee for manual forwarding. Several vendors make one of these combination fax connector and magic box servers for Exchange. Microsoft Fax is a client tool. It is not Exchange Server aware. It's been awhile since I looked at it, but if it can save a document as a fax file, then presumably this could be attached to a mail message and the proper MIME type would get applied. But as the EG's said, this would be lame beyond belief or any human comprehension. Usually people are interested in transmitting digital data and getting non-digital data into some sort of intelligible format. To take a perfectly good digital document, then store it as a useless piece of raster junk, and then send it as an SMTP attachment to someone that has some sort of a junky raster-only printer, well, that would be sad. So it is hard to imagine a scenario in which someone would want to spend money integrating MS Fax to an e-mail service. The right way to leverage MS Fax is in a scenario in which you have a requirement for a small number of users to send or receive Faxes, but can't cost justify the incremental cost of something like OmTool for Exchange over the cost of some personal modems. Some organizations are going to be in a bind with this. Most good enterprise security policies prohibit using a personal modem to link to an external connection while at the same time being connected to the enterprise network. Obviously, something like OmTool solves this problem, but that does not make the cost story any prettier
RE: Fax
Symantec Fax program that comes with Win2k? If Win2k comes with Fax software that can send and receive faxes like a stripped down version of WinFax, that would be great. The modem is hooked up to a server, it is not hooked up to the client. -Original Message- From: Don Ely Sent: Thu 11/15/2001 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Fax For a whoppin 7 faxes a year, I wouldn't do anything beyond WinFax. I might even be inclined to use the Symantec Fax program that comes with W2K... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I am not looking for anything fancy. I just want the ability to fax out of Outlook and receive faxes. I get about 2 per year and I send about 5 per year. I was hoping to not spend any money if I dont have to. I may have to look to something like WinFax. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig Sent: Thu 11/15/2001 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Fax Oh, one other thing. If someone on the outside of your company is sophisticated enough to be able to handle supplemental DTMF addressing to cause an inbound fax arriving at your Exchange Server to be properly routed, then that person will have access to a digital route, which basically means that inbound automatic routing can work, but no one is ever going to use it. You can buy the technology, but that does not make it worthwhile. Inbound will have to be manually forwarded. Fax really is an obsolete technology that is probably less useful than an Underwood. -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses) Can Exchange act as a fax server? Not exactly. Fax's can be transported by SMTP as a registered MIME type. This of course makes the server blind to the content, and means that it can be a client issue. However, Exchange Server can also have a FAX service or connector installed. This enables the server itself to drive a modem or high grade telephony board to either directly send or receive faxes. Outbound, MAPI clients (i.e. Outlook) or OWA clients can send to a fax recipient using ad hoc addressing, once the FAX address type has been created by adding such a service. Of course, permanent fax addressees can be stored in the AD/GAL or the PAB/CL. Inbound, is a little trickier. If the inbound fax has some DTMF supplemental addressing that maps (insert magic box here) to an AD/GAL addressee, then the MTA can deliver it. Alternately, they can be routed to a specific printer, or a specific secretarial addressee for manual forwarding. Several vendors make one of these combination fax connector and magic box servers for Exchange. Microsoft Fax is a client tool. It is not Exchange Server aware. It's been awhile since I looked at it, but if it can save a document as a fax file, then presumably this could be attached to a mail message and the proper MIME type would get applied. But as the EG's said, this would be lame beyond belief or any human comprehension. Usually people are interested in transmitting digital data and getting non-digital data into some sort of intelligible format. To take a perfectly good digital document, then store it as a useless piece of raster junk, and then send it as an SMTP attachment to someone that has some sort of a junky raster-only printer, well, that would
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
umm...thats why I made the joke about the sarcasm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: September 5, 2001 1:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I've got news fer ya bud; Ive known Ed for several years now, hoisted more than a couple of beers with him and he still gets sarcastic with me. I think most would consider me a list insider (if such a thing existed). - Original Message - From: Rocky Stefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:38 PM Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I know you did. Heaven forbid should you side with an outsider on something as touchy as this without at least a hint of sarcasm :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 5, 2001 12:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Read, actually, although I pretty much tuned out about 1/3 of the way through. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'm going to expect that anyways but I'd figure someone would listen. You did smirk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 9:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'm not saying your point is groundless, but it would have probably been best had you drafted that memo, then pressed Delete. You'd have felt better and you'd have not incited a flame war. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? C'mon Chris, What you are telling me is that you are advocating the use of the list NOT for Exchange discussions (because a newbie might ask dumb questions) but rather for the stupid and ENDLESS conversations about bloody tacos and which hole in my body produces the most gas? How about some haiku Friday? I have no problem listening to that endless drivel all day or most of the drivel out of the list all week and its gang but please don't tell me that someone can't ask a question just because its partially covered by a FAQ. Almost every question asked on this list could be answered with some well done research off the net. People use lists because they are useful for getting the information they need quick without a lot of research. Once they have narrowed their choices down from list responses then they can do their own homework. Every companies website (for exchange faxing) will tell you that theirs is the best. Let's not forget the 100 or so FAQU responses to people's questions about something legitimate. How is someone to know if a solution is problematic or not without soliciting the help of the list? Regards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scharff, Chris Sent: September 4, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? The topic has been discussed ad nauseum. Rather than turn a discussion list into a re-hash list, those who were strong advocates of their products made arguments for inclusion of their product in the FAQ.. and in some cases exclusion of their products from the FAQ. Of course the FAQ is a living growing thing, so if someone had something more intelligent to add than I've been using X for 3 days now in my home lab and really like it it might be added to the FAQ as well. If Gordon had asked if anyone knew of a fax product which offered a unique subset of features then perhaps calling FAQ would have been in error. What do you feel is the best fax solution however is at least 6 hours of solid reading in the archives. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
Oh please. I was simply trying to be nice and not point out so bluntly that Gordon's question was a fscking stupid one. What's the best $foo is, in general a poor question indicative of a poster who either doesn't understand the area into which they are delving at all or who is too lazy to actually do a needs analysis for their organization and is hoping for an easy answer. I'm aware that every vendor tries to pass off their product as the best of breed solution for the industry and as being capable of meeting the needs of anyone and everyone. I'm also aware that it's generally complete bullshit. However, that doesn't excuse one from doing some basic internal research into the needs of ones organization with regards to faxing and developing a set of requirements with which to judge the available packages. What's the best $foo? Based on cost? Based on reliability? Based on integration with Exchange? Based on vendor support? Based on required feature $feature? Based on interoperability with $other_application? Based on ease of administration? Based on the name of the vendor whose sales rep your CIO is banging? So, Gordon I'm sorry I pointed out your question was feeble. Rocky, I'm sorry you lacked the ability to clue into what was being said. Discussing fax products isn't off limits, but christ on a cracker, it'd be nice if those wanting to get information about fax products would at least take the time to articulate their needs before asking for a product recommendation. The fax solution I use might be a piss poor solution for Gordon and I fail to see how my mentioning it is of any value to him in determining what subset of products to evaluate. As to Haiku and Fish Tacos... Those are pretty feeble off topic threads as well and I've mentioned that off list to more than one aspiring poet and food critic. This list is a useful resource for getting information quick... Ask a poorly phrased question and you get lots of bad information quickly. Taking the time to do some perfunctory research and to develop an intelligent question often yields better answers, although they come a bit slower, as meaningful information can rarely be conveyed as quickly as bullshit. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Cheshire-Puss, she began, would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? That depends a good deal on where you want to get to, said the Cat. I don't care much where-- said Alice. Then it doesn't matter which way you go, said the Cat. * -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 7:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? C'mon Chris, What you are telling me is that you are advocating the use of the list NOT for Exchange discussions (because a newbie might ask dumb questions) but rather for the stupid and ENDLESS conversations about bloody tacos and which hole in my body produces the most gas? How about some haiku Friday? I have no problem listening to that endless drivel all day or most of the drivel out of the list all week and its gang but please don't tell me that someone can't ask a question just because its partially covered by a FAQ. Almost every question asked on this list could be answered with some well done research off the net. People use lists because they are useful for getting the information they need quick without a lot of research. Once they have narrowed their choices down from list responses then they can do their own homework. Every companies website (for exchange faxing) will tell you that theirs is the best. Let's not forget the 100 or so FAQU responses to people's questions about something legitimate. How is someone to know if a solution is problematic or not without soliciting the help of the list? Regards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scharff, Chris Sent: September 4, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? The topic has been discussed ad nauseum. Rather than turn a discussion list into a re-hash list, those who were strong advocates of their products made arguments for inclusion of their product in the FAQ.. and in some cases exclusion of their products from the FAQ. Of course the FAQ is a living growing thing, so if someone had something more intelligent to add than I've been using X for 3 days now in my home lab and really like it it might be added to the FAQ as well. If Gordon had asked if anyone knew of a fax product which offered a unique subset of features then perhaps calling FAQ would have been in error. What do you feel is the best fax solution however is at least 6 hours
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
Well I appreciate your comment. Its probably the best one I've seen so far in a long time. thanks for the pot shot as well I loved it and expected no less -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scharff, Chris Sent: September 5, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Oh please. I was simply trying to be nice and not point out so bluntly that Gordon's question was a fscking stupid one. What's the best $foo is, in general a poor question indicative of a poster who either doesn't understand the area into which they are delving at all or who is too lazy to actually do a needs analysis for their organization and is hoping for an easy answer. I'm aware that every vendor tries to pass off their product as the best of breed solution for the industry and as being capable of meeting the needs of anyone and everyone. I'm also aware that it's generally complete bullshit. However, that doesn't excuse one from doing some basic internal research into the needs of ones organization with regards to faxing and developing a set of requirements with which to judge the available packages. What's the best $foo? Based on cost? Based on reliability? Based on integration with Exchange? Based on vendor support? Based on required feature $feature? Based on interoperability with $other_application? Based on ease of administration? Based on the name of the vendor whose sales rep your CIO is banging? So, Gordon I'm sorry I pointed out your question was feeble. Rocky, I'm sorry you lacked the ability to clue into what was being said. Discussing fax products isn't off limits, but christ on a cracker, it'd be nice if those wanting to get information about fax products would at least take the time to articulate their needs before asking for a product recommendation. The fax solution I use might be a piss poor solution for Gordon and I fail to see how my mentioning it is of any value to him in determining what subset of products to evaluate. As to Haiku and Fish Tacos... Those are pretty feeble off topic threads as well and I've mentioned that off list to more than one aspiring poet and food critic. This list is a useful resource for getting information quick... Ask a poorly phrased question and you get lots of bad information quickly. Taking the time to do some perfunctory research and to develop an intelligent question often yields better answers, although they come a bit slower, as meaningful information can rarely be conveyed as quickly as bullshit. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Cheshire-Puss, she began, would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? That depends a good deal on where you want to get to, said the Cat. I don't care much where-- said Alice. Then it doesn't matter which way you go, said the Cat. * -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 7:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? C'mon Chris, What you are telling me is that you are advocating the use of the list NOT for Exchange discussions (because a newbie might ask dumb questions) but rather for the stupid and ENDLESS conversations about bloody tacos and which hole in my body produces the most gas? How about some haiku Friday? I have no problem listening to that endless drivel all day or most of the drivel out of the list all week and its gang but please don't tell me that someone can't ask a question just because its partially covered by a FAQ. Almost every question asked on this list could be answered with some well done research off the net. People use lists because they are useful for getting the information they need quick without a lot of research. Once they have narrowed their choices down from list responses then they can do their own homework. Every companies website (for exchange faxing) will tell you that theirs is the best. Let's not forget the 100 or so FAQU responses to people's questions about something legitimate. How is someone to know if a solution is problematic or not without soliciting the help of the list? Regards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scharff, Chris Sent: September 4, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? The topic has been discussed ad nauseum. Rather than turn a discussion list into a re-hash list, those who were strong advocates of their products made arguments for inclusion of their product in the FAQ.. and in some cases exclusion of their products from the FAQ. Of course the FAQ is a living growing thing, so if someone had something more intelligent to add than I've
Re: Fax server - What is the best solution?
I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fax server - What is the best solution?
Well, best is a subjective term. I've heard good reports on OmFax. - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:14 PM Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
I've setup Rightfax from Captaris (formerly AVT) on several servers and its flawless (ok maybe not perfect but no one is) The Exchange gateway is fully integrated with AD and Exchange 2000. Its really nice and uses the MMC snapin as well so you can do all admin from one console. http://www.rightfax.com/products/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: September 4, 2001 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
For all the brains to show off maybe hehe -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
You realize that even if I didn't get that response from you I had already expected it :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: September 4, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
Let me ask it a little differently. I am thinking about GFI because I have used the five user version. Has anyone had any negative experiences with it? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
The topic has been discussed ad nauseum. Rather than turn a discussion list into a re-hash list, those who were strong advocates of their products made arguments for inclusion of their product in the FAQ.. and in some cases exclusion of their products from the FAQ. Of course the FAQ is a living growing thing, so if someone had something more intelligent to add than I've been using X for 3 days now in my home lab and really like it it might be added to the FAQ as well. If Gordon had asked if anyone knew of a fax product which offered a unique subset of features then perhaps calling FAQ would have been in error. What do you feel is the best fax solution however is at least 6 hours of solid reading in the archives. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
Not to suggest that anybody shouldn't contribute his or her experiences with GFI, but I do recall some comments in the past about this product (but I don't recall whether positive or negative), so you might want to consider a search of the archives. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Let me ask it a little differently. I am thinking about GFI because I have used the five user version. Has anyone had any negative experiences with it? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
I, for one, am working today, and I've actually posted a question in hopes of gaining an assist! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I've noticed that some of the regulars on the list actually have some work to do today -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: September 4, 2001 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Well it was a different response than what I normally might have sent, but I'm actually busy today and don't have the time. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? You realize that even if I didn't get that response from you I had already expected it :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: September 4, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
LOL! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What about That response deserves a High Five and that is four more than I normally give. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax:(360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:08 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Well it was a different response than what I normally might have sent, but I'm actually busy today and don't have the time. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? You realize that even if I didn't get that response from you I had already expected it :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: September 4, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: Fax server - What is the best solution?
finished work hours ago.. used only 2 products, zetfax and gfi no issues with gfi at all, works well and delivers zetafax...well if i could run an i hate zetafax list I would, especially based on the level of support they provide.hello, i'm the gimp, how can I help? (fish taco? ... wassat?) - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:01 PM Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Let me ask it a little differently. I am thinking about GFI because I have used the five user version. Has anyone had any negative experiences with it? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
I would agree. GFI works great. I only have one complaint. That is the split server method they use. Essentially, I didn't want to run it on my Exchange server. I wanted a separate box for it. They don't have a method of installing on a separate box and then just installing the connector on your Exchange box. You have to install the whole program, then make some changes to the path to show it the other server to connect too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Wedderburn Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? finished work hours ago.. used only 2 products, zetfax and gfi no issues with gfi at all, works well and delivers zetafax...well if i could run an i hate zetafax list I would, especially based on the level of support they provide.hello, i'm the gimp, how can I help? (fish taco? ... wassat?) - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:01 PM Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Let me ask it a little differently. I am thinking about GFI because I have used the five user version. Has anyone had any negative experiences with it? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
Then I guess you won't mind answering everyone's questions then. -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I've noticed that some of the regulars on the list actually have some work to do today -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: September 4, 2001 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Well it was a different response than what I normally might have sent, but I'm actually busy today and don't have the time. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? You realize that even if I didn't get that response from you I had already expected it :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: September 4, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
I saw that. In answer to your question: 1 - 2.5 gigs on a switched network depending on how busy the network is. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I, for one, am working today, and I've actually posted a question in hopes of gaining an assist! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I've noticed that some of the regulars on the list actually have some work to do today -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: September 4, 2001 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Well it was a different response than what I normally might have sent, but I'm actually busy today and don't have the time. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? You realize that even if I didn't get that response from you I had already expected it :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: September 4, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
If I could and was smart enough like you I would -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: September 4, 2001 6:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Then I guess you won't mind answering everyone's questions then. -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I've noticed that some of the regulars on the list actually have some work to do today -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: September 4, 2001 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Well it was a different response than what I normally might have sent, but I'm actually busy today and don't have the time. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? You realize that even if I didn't get that response from you I had already expected it :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: September 4, 2001 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
I'm not saying your point is groundless, but it would have probably been best had you drafted that memo, then pressed Delete. You'd have felt better and you'd have not incited a flame war. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? C'mon Chris, What you are telling me is that you are advocating the use of the list NOT for Exchange discussions (because a newbie might ask dumb questions) but rather for the stupid and ENDLESS conversations about bloody tacos and which hole in my body produces the most gas? How about some haiku Friday? I have no problem listening to that endless drivel all day or most of the drivel out of the list all week and its gang but please don't tell me that someone can't ask a question just because its partially covered by a FAQ. Almost every question asked on this list could be answered with some well done research off the net. People use lists because they are useful for getting the information they need quick without a lot of research. Once they have narrowed their choices down from list responses then they can do their own homework. Every companies website (for exchange faxing) will tell you that theirs is the best. Let's not forget the 100 or so FAQU responses to people's questions about something legitimate. How is someone to know if a solution is problematic or not without soliciting the help of the list? Regards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scharff, Chris Sent: September 4, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? The topic has been discussed ad nauseum. Rather than turn a discussion list into a re-hash list, those who were strong advocates of their products made arguments for inclusion of their product in the FAQ.. and in some cases exclusion of their products from the FAQ. Of course the FAQ is a living growing thing, so if someone had something more intelligent to add than I've been using X for 3 days now in my home lab and really like it it might be added to the FAQ as well. If Gordon had asked if anyone knew of a fax product which offered a unique subset of features then perhaps calling FAQ would have been in error. What do you feel is the best fax solution however is at least 6 hours of solid reading in the archives. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
I'm going to expect that anyways but I'd figure someone would listen. You did smirk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 9:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'm not saying your point is groundless, but it would have probably been best had you drafted that memo, then pressed Delete. You'd have felt better and you'd have not incited a flame war. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? C'mon Chris, What you are telling me is that you are advocating the use of the list NOT for Exchange discussions (because a newbie might ask dumb questions) but rather for the stupid and ENDLESS conversations about bloody tacos and which hole in my body produces the most gas? How about some haiku Friday? I have no problem listening to that endless drivel all day or most of the drivel out of the list all week and its gang but please don't tell me that someone can't ask a question just because its partially covered by a FAQ. Almost every question asked on this list could be answered with some well done research off the net. People use lists because they are useful for getting the information they need quick without a lot of research. Once they have narrowed their choices down from list responses then they can do their own homework. Every companies website (for exchange faxing) will tell you that theirs is the best. Let's not forget the 100 or so FAQU responses to people's questions about something legitimate. How is someone to know if a solution is problematic or not without soliciting the help of the list? Regards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scharff, Chris Sent: September 4, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? The topic has been discussed ad nauseum. Rather than turn a discussion list into a re-hash list, those who were strong advocates of their products made arguments for inclusion of their product in the FAQ.. and in some cases exclusion of their products from the FAQ. Of course the FAQ is a living growing thing, so if someone had something more intelligent to add than I've been using X for 3 days now in my home lab and really like it it might be added to the FAQ as well. If Gordon had asked if anyone knew of a fax product which offered a unique subset of features then perhaps calling FAQ would have been in error. What do you feel is the best fax solution however is at least 6 hours of solid reading in the archives. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best
Re: Fax server - What is the best solution?
I've got news fer ya bud; Ive known Ed for several years now, hoisted more than a couple of beers with him and he still gets sarcastic with me. I think most would consider me a list insider (if such a thing existed). - Original Message - From: Rocky Stefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:38 PM Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I know you did. Heaven forbid should you side with an outsider on something as touchy as this without at least a hint of sarcasm :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 5, 2001 12:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Read, actually, although I pretty much tuned out about 1/3 of the way through. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'm going to expect that anyways but I'd figure someone would listen. You did smirk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 9:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'm not saying your point is groundless, but it would have probably been best had you drafted that memo, then pressed Delete. You'd have felt better and you'd have not incited a flame war. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? C'mon Chris, What you are telling me is that you are advocating the use of the list NOT for Exchange discussions (because a newbie might ask dumb questions) but rather for the stupid and ENDLESS conversations about bloody tacos and which hole in my body produces the most gas? How about some haiku Friday? I have no problem listening to that endless drivel all day or most of the drivel out of the list all week and its gang but please don't tell me that someone can't ask a question just because its partially covered by a FAQ. Almost every question asked on this list could be answered with some well done research off the net. People use lists because they are useful for getting the information they need quick without a lot of research. Once they have narrowed their choices down from list responses then they can do their own homework. Every companies website (for exchange faxing) will tell you that theirs is the best. Let's not forget the 100 or so FAQU responses to people's questions about something legitimate. How is someone to know if a solution is problematic or not without soliciting the help of the list? Regards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scharff, Chris Sent: September 4, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? The topic has been discussed ad nauseum. Rather than turn a discussion list into a re-hash list, those who were strong advocates of their products made arguments for inclusion of their product in the FAQ.. and in some cases exclusion of their products from the FAQ. Of course the FAQ is a living growing thing, so if someone had something more intelligent to add than I've been using X for 3 days now in my home lab and really like it it might be added to the FAQ as well. If Gordon had asked if anyone knew of a fax product which offered a unique subset of features then perhaps calling FAQ would have been in error. What do you feel is the best fax solution however is at least 6 hours of solid reading in the archives. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes
