Re: [expert] Thinking of switching to Mandrake
On Friday 14 November 2003 10:24 am, Anne Wilson wrote: > > Sorry... It's in there by default in KMail since I have multiple > > email addresses configured. :-) Will try to do better next time. > > ;-) John > > Tips for using kmail - > > Set up two profiles - it doesn't matter that they are using the same > mailbox and smtp - one with reply-to set if you need it for other > purposes, and one without for the list (together with suitable sig if > you wish. > > Create a folder to receive list traffic. Then use Settings > > Configure Filters to send all mail there. > > Right click on the new folder, select Properties, and you can > associate the folder with the mailing list, and also set it to use > the profile you have created whenever you send while in that foler. > Anne, thanks for the tips, however, I have MULTIPLE profiles and MULTIPLE folders specifically for mailing lists. Trust me, I've been using KMail for a LONG time now... :-) I was so very happy to be able to download my SpamCop email via IMAP among other features... :-) For me, it's just easier to use my default profile and remove the reply-to address manually. :-) Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Re: Thinking of switching to Mandrake
On Thursday 13 November 2003 08:33 pm, T. Ribbrock wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:57:04PM -0500, John Aldrich wrote: > > I'm thinking of switching to Mandrake from RedHat 9 > > [...] > > Funny to see some old hands from redhat-list show up here all in a > sudden... Welcome, John! :-) > I've actually done the same, though I came from RHL7.3 and I did a > full install (MDK9.1 - the 9.2 CDs only arrived yesterday). > Heh... well, when your O/S vendor decides they no longer want anything to do with "hobbyists" you have to make other arrangements. :-) Thanks for the warm welcome! Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Thinking of switching to Mandrake
On Thursday 13 November 2003 05:07 pm, Jack Coates wrote: > On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 13:57, John Aldrich wrote: > > I'm thinking of switching to Mandrake from RedHat 9 since RedHat is > > effectively discontinuing the full-fledged "hobbyist" version of RedHat > > and splitting the userbase between "Fedora" for those of us who don't > > have several hundred dollars for "enterprise" linux and those who have > > the money and need for "Enterprise" linux. > > welcome. A list etiquette thing on this list is to not set reply-to -- > see http://www.monkeynoodle.org/comp/rely-to. > Sorry... It's in there by default in KMail since I have multiple email addresses configured. :-) Will try to do better next time. ;-) John Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Thinking of switching to Mandrake
I'm thinking of switching to Mandrake from RedHat 9 since RedHat is effectively discontinuing the full-fledged "hobbyist" version of RedHat and splitting the userbase between "Fedora" for those of us who don't have several hundred dollars for "enterprise" linux and those who have the money and need for "Enterprise" linux. My question is, how well would the switch go? I typically keep my home directory on it's own partition and another partition with some MP3s and other miscellaneous data. I typically blow everything else away and reformat. One thing I liked about RedHat was that when I did this, it would recognize how my system was partitioned and offer to re-use the old partitions. Will Mandrake do this for me? I'm on RedHat 9.0 right now with ext3 file systems throughout. I have used Mandrake before, but the last time I think I used it was back around Mandrake 5 or 6, before they made it so difficult to get ISOs of the distro. I basically liked it then, but there were a few "advanced" features I wasn't so thrilled with, but I'm looking at giving it another shot. Thanks... John Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Re: [MandrakeForum] System Resources Needed For X, KDE, SO
On Fri, 06 Oct 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Anyone in for more tips? > Sure... what video card is in this thing? If it's an old 2-4 meg video card, it's not going to have NEARLY the performance that a nice 16 or 32 meg card does... and more RAM on the video card leaves more RAM up for grabs on the motherboard. At least it would seem logical that if you've got that much RAM, display-related stuff would use that video ram... John Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
[expert] Re: [MandrakeForum] wu-ftp delay before login request
On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > wu-ftp delay before login request > (http://forum.mandrakesoft.com/article.php3?sid=2917133754) > > Richard mCallister writes "I'm setting up Mandrake 7.1 to recieve files from another >pc @ 1 file per second. I'm finding a delay after requesting to ftp (message >"connected to 127.0.0.1") of about a minute and a half, before it requests my name & >password. Because of this, the requesting pc times out, and disconnects. I have it >working on 2 PCs (requests name & password immediatly after the ftp request), but >can't find the reason for the delay on 3 others. I've compared about every file in >/etc and start-up services, and can't find any differances. Anyone know what might be >causing this delay, and how to fix it??? " > > COMMENT This is very strange. I never heard of such a thing before, it sounds like >some kind of network-misconfiguration to me (why is it connecting to loclhost, >anyway?), rather than wuftpd problem. Folks does any of you have a clue? > I recall something simliar in another list awhile back. Turned out to be a reverse DNS problem. Put the IP and machine name of the requesting machine in the "hosts" (/etc/hosts I think) file and HOPEFULLY everything should work... Or, set up a DNS server on your lan and set it up to forward requests for outside systems to your ISP's name server and handle all in-house DNS. John Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
[expert] Re: [MandrakeForum] Installing GRUB
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Installing GRUB > (http://forum.mandrakesoft.com/article.php3?sid=2825031605) > > Vincent writes "I have a Western Digital 10.2 GB hard drive with EZ-BIOS. EZ-BIOS >allows you to use all 10.2 GBs with a BIOS that doesn't support drives larger than >2.1 GB. EZ-BIOS installs to the first sector of the hard drive, so the MBR is moved >over to the second sector. Does Linux Mandrake install GRUB to the first sector of >the hard drive or does it install it to the sector containing the MBR? " > > COMMENT: > AFAIK, Linux does not need this EZ-BIOS at all, since it reads the HD info itself, but I have no idea how does our installe r react on that little pesky. Let us ask Pixel! Pixel? .-) > This is correct. Linux does NOT need EZ-Bios. All you need is to have is enough of the kernel within an area that the bios can read and then linux takes over after boot. John
Re: [expert] Memory above 1GB
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Hi, > > I have 7.1 installed on a couple of machines with 1.5 GB and they show up > as 1 GB although I said I have 1.5 (it autodetected 968M) during > installation. > > Any help? (other than appending line mem= to the kernel which I alredy did > and dosn't work). > > Is it that the default kernel dosn't support more than 1GB? what do I have > to get it to recognize more than 1GB in that case? > > pleas help.. this is urgent! > I think I recall reading that linux needs special "hacks" to use memory above 1 GB. You'll likely need to recompile the kernel with some patches. Good luck! John
Re: [expert] kmail option?
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, you wrote: > To all: > > I have been using kmail, and I have to say that I am very pleased > with all the features and the filtering. The only thing: Is there a > way to have kmail to default to netscape when you click on a url in a > message? Maybe a particular file that could be edited to change from > kfm to netscape? I know that I am probably just grasping at air with > this, but if anyone has any suggestions please send them my way. > Nope. That's a KDE thing, not a KMail thing. You'll need to hack KDE to get it to default to Netscape. John
Re: [expert] Kmail and threading...
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Can anyone tell me, does Kmail do threading like Nutscrape Messynger? > Not yet. I think that is planned for an upcoming version (AFTER KDE2 is released) John
Re: [expert] 32MB Mdk 7.1 systems?
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, you wrote: > > Perhaps. It's an old Vanilla Pentium system, clocking in around 166 or > 200 Mhz. > Probably 72-pin simms. > > > I'll make sure there are no FTP daemons running. Forgot about that. > Anyway, though, I was thinking more along the lines of "What do you do on > your own system?" > Well, since I'm using this as a desktop O/S and not a server, I have everything in /etc/inetd.conf disabled. Here's what I have ENABLED in "setup -> System Services": atd autofs crond gpm identd inet ipchains jumkbuster (added -- does not come with any install that I'm aware of) keytable kudzu (I'm using RH 6.2 here at home and work.) network pcmcia (my boss thinks it helps pci, and it doesn't hurt and if there's a CHANCE it'll help... ) random reconfig sshd2 (the binary includes ssh1 for backwards compatibility -- if you get open ssh make sure it is backwards compatible!) syslog xfs > > Good thinking. Right now he's stuck using a garbage > Trident-3DImage975-Based Jaton Blaze3D. Mandrake is the only system that > actually installs (other than Windoze). > Yeah. My first experience with linux (as MY desktop) was with an S3-trio 3D which ONLY Mandrake 5.3 would support and even then it was something like 320x200 max! :-) Now, I've got a Graphics Blaster Riva TNT at work and a Voodoo 3/3000 at home. :-) John
Re: [expert] editors
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, you wrote: > what kind of a question is that ?!?!??!?! > do what ever you want man...and please dont send this junk massages to > this list...Linux related question's only ! > And this is a non-linux related question, HOW??? Since we've been discussing the relative benefits of vi/vim versus other editors, all of which are primarily available under *nix. John
Re: [expert] 32MB Mdk 7.1 systems?
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, you wrote: > On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Hoyt wrote: > > > Just examine the ram or take it with you when you go to buy more. You may be > > able to "trade in" the old ram if you don't have enough free sockets. Buy as > > much as you can afford - it only gets more scarce and more expensive. > > You're saying I should buy RAM in a *store*? > > I haven't bought computer components from stores since 1997 > (Yay Internet!) > > Aren't there programs available to determine RAM type, via probing or > something? > Just open the case and take a look. Sure it'll be slightly more expensive to buy stuff in a store. Or, just swipe one of the sticks of ram and (using something like a pencil so as to limit the possibility of damage) count the individual connectors. Also there should be some information on the sticks of ram that tells whether it's EDO, Fast-Page or what! John
Re: [expert] 32MB Mdk 7.1 systems?
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Well, that's another problem. I have no idea what type of RAM it > uses. He's been thinking about upgrading the RAM for almost a year now, > but we have no idea about RAM type. I would **guess** EDO 72pin SIMMs, > but if I buy it and it doesn't work, I'm down $75 (for only 32MB more). > Hmm...what kind of machine does your friend have? If it's a pentium or 486, chances are you're right -- it is 72-pin simms. Your best bet is to open the case, grab one of the existing simms / dimms and take it with you to the store. > > Anyway, John specifically: > > What GUI (if any) do you use? > KDE > > What daemons should I (he) disable? > Hard question. If it's for a desktop system, I'd disable everything in /etc/inetd.conf, as well as just about everything else. If it's an internet machine, you DEFINITELY want to shut off everything in /etc/inetd.conf for security reasons alone. > > Any other ideas for making his system more usable? > Hmm... not really. You don't give us a lot to go on. I mean, are we talking a 486, a P100, what? I'm guessing a high-end Pentium or better since you said something about a multi-gig hard drive and those wouldn't work in a 486. If you don't already have a good video card, get a really good video card with lots of RAM on it too (Riva TNT based card or Voodoo 3 of some sort are good cards, both available in PCI or AGP!) John
Re: [expert] 32MB Mdk 7.1 systems?
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I have a friend who I'm trying to introduce to Linux. I installed > Linux-Mandrake 7.1 on his system, and everything worked. However, it is > extremely slow at networking, and swaps all the time. His machine is > connected to a Road Runner cable modem, so the internet access should be > extremely fast, but it's not. Netscape gets ~2K/second, and is "slower > than Windows." He also has Win95 installed in /dev/hda1. > > It's installed on a 900MB / (ext2) partition, and has a 120MB swap > partition (hda5 and hda6, respectively). > > If any of you have Linux-based systems running on 32MB, and don't feel > it's frightfully slow to use GNOME or KDE with it, please say so. If you > have any ideas as to how to speed up his machine (I've disabled apache, > bind, and other server daemons), please share them with me. He is an > intelligent person, and a very good computer user, and a programmer. He > insists he's going to delete it tomorrow, and I'd rather see him happy, > using Linux for his everyday stuff. > > Upgrade the RAM! 32MB is pushing it QUITE a bit! I've got a 32-meg system here (K6-300) and it's somewhat slow. It also depends on what sort of CPU speed you have. Please keep in mind that Mandrake is optimized for Pentium or better (maybe even PII by now!)
Re: [expert] did the list die?
I hate to tell you both this, but I've been getting a TON of mail. John On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, ron peake wrote: > Hi Bill > Not only does the email often NOT get through it also appears to be > censured. For example Macmillan monopoly is a definite non-topic. > Regard, > Ron > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, you wrote: > > No mail from the list since Friday, what gives? > > Bill
Re: [expert] server question
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Thus spake Tony McGee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > [...] > > Firewalling works by selectively blocking off access to certain Internet > > Protocol ports. It's recommended to have a single dedicated machine as a > > firewall and a second one as an internal mail/web server but if you're short on > > machines you can always just combine the two servers onto the one box and be > > more careful about your firewall rules. For a full run down on how the firewall > > sofftware IPCHAINS works refer to it's HOW-TO document. > > For those of us without the time to spend and who can afford it, > Linksys (I'm pretty sure) make a CABLE/DSL/Firewall/10-100 Ethernet > switch all in one box which retails for $299 Cdn (so presumably around > $200 US). > It's listed in warehouse.com's catalog for $179 US. John
Re: [expert] RPM database won't rebuild!
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Dear friends > > I would appreciate your help with my rpm database problem: > > I was been unable to get my RealPlayer to play Radio Free Europe from > its usual URL using Netscape. There is nothing wrong with RealPlayer > itself. It plays other stations and even Radio Free Europe using a > different URL. > However, due to the original problem, I decided to uninstall RealPlayer > and then reinstall it. But something went wrong with my attempt to > rebuild my rpm database. > Which version of RPM do you have installed? If you installed 4.0, you're going to have problems. If you're using 3.0.5, that should be forward and backward compatible. John
Re: [expert] Boot Logger???
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, you wrote: > > 3)Someone knows how to create a log file to look at the messages created > during the boot sequence? or if it is just being created by default where it >resides??? > Tnks! > > Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: 1) Please lose the HTML. It's hard to read and not everyone's mail client supports HTML. 2) type "dmesg" at the command prompt and see what you think... John
Re: [expert] Re: KVM Switches & Mouse Problem
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, you wrote: > I need to register a dissenting vote against Belkin here. For a couple of > years I used a Belkin OmniView (not an SE as far as I can tell) that > suffered from a number of problems, mostly related to poor wheel mouse > support, even in NT. Linux was very problematic with this switchbox, so I > took the route of having a full-time mouse for each box. The othe problem > was the ergonomics of the OmniView were horrible...little teeny buttons > located next to the bottom of the case. Ugh. > > I now have a Cybex SwitchView and it works like a champ. We use hundreds > of switchboxes at work, and we're much happier with the Cybex products. > The SE has only TWO buttons -- one for which computer and one for which switchbox you want (assuming you've got multiple boxes linked) and it works beautifully with a MS Intellimouse. John
Re: [expert] Re: KVM Switches & Mouse Problem
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, you wrote: > > > > I now have a Cybex SwitchView and it works like a champ. We use hundreds > > of switchboxes at work, and we're much happier with the Cybex products. > > > The SE has only TWO buttons -- one for which computer and one for > which switchbox you want (assuming you've got multiple boxes linked) > and it works beautifully with a MS Intellimouse. > John > I suppose I should clarify -- My Omniveiw SE can handle up to 4 ports and the computer selection is PREFERABLY handled by using the scroll lock to scroll through the machines (unfortunately, there's no menu, so you have to cycle through all the machines on the KVM switch) but you can also manually cycle through by using the button on the switch itself to cycle through the machines. It's definitely much easier to use the scroll lock button on the keyboard... :-) John
Re: Re Re [expert] Vi/Vim - The editor from HELL! How do I setthedefault editor so I can TRASH IT?
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, you wrote: > > What are the programs that use this environment variable? I just typed > `echo $EDITOR` at a prompt and received nothing. I haven't modified any of the > system wide profile files or my own .bashrc file since installation, neither > have I received any warnings that the env variable isn't set. > Add to .bashrc "export editor=" My .bashrc has "export EDITOR=joe" in it. I think that if you want something OTHER than the default, you have to specify it that way. SOMEWHERE in one of the default config files, there is an editor specified, and that editor DEFAULTS to vi in every case that I've seen. John
Re: Re Re [expert] Vi/Vim - The editor from HELL! How do I setthedefault editor so I can TRASH IT?
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, you wrote: > No-one is forcing you to use vim. If you don't like it use something else! Can > we kill this thread please? The best thing to come out of it would be for > Mandrakesoft to take the suggestion of a default editor selection at > installation time because complaining how vi sucks or how vi rocks so much at > length is just igniting a holy flame war. > Well, in point of fact, they are. When vi/vim is the "default" editor of choice when you install linux, you ARE forcing people to use vi. Not everyone knows that you can just edit your .bashrc (or /etc/bashrc) to fix this. John
Re: [expert] server question
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Is it practical / advisable to set up a single machine to act as > a firewall/email/web server or am I looking for MAJOR trouble. > > I'm trying to run a SOHO with limited resources/computers but > still need all the goodies. > My suggestion would be two computers -- one for firewall and one for email/web server. 'Course depending on how much mail and how much web traffic you have, it may get a bit overloaded. And you'll want a LOT of ram in that thing! John
Re: [expert] howdo I single boot?
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Well...now wait a minute...That's an interesting concept. What it 'that' > and how would one do that? > No network access, and no login prompt either. Type "linux single" at the lilo prompt (minus quotes) and it should put you into single-user mode. It's good for some disk repair stuff, etc. John
Re: [expert] Time till messages appear.
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Jason Pierce wrote: > Why does it take so long for messages to be sent to the list? I sent a message over >an hour ago, and it hasn't showed up yet. This has happened to me before too. Are >all messages manually moderated befor being sent to the list or something? > Jason -- this list is NOT moderated, however, it's a VERY busy list and the poor list server is apparently overworked. Just take a chill pill. Your post WILL arrive. I'm sending this at around 9pm Eastern on Tuesday August 15th. You should get one copy of this message right away. Wait and see how long it takes for the copy to come from the list and you'll see it'll probably take over an hour. I wouldn't be too concerned unless it doesn't arrive in over 24 hours. John
Re: [expert] Re: KVM Switches & Mouse Problem
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Yes, the mouse works fine without the KVM device. > I'm using a KVM switch here -- a Belkin Omniview SE and it works fine with my Windows box and my linux box. I've got a true-blue IBM PS/2 keyboard and a Microsoft Intellimouse hooked up to the KVM. It works fine, for me. Since you have no problems when the mouse is hooked up straight, that tells me that the KVM is the problem. John
Re: [expert] Sendmail relay confusion
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, you wrote: > One other thing, is it worth using FEATURE(rbl)?? > IIRC, the "FEATURE(rbl)" means that you will be refusing email from "known" spam sources and known "open relays." This is a question only you can answer. Do you want to accept email from known spam sites and open relays? If so, don't use the rbl feature. If you DON'T want to receive email from them, enable that feature. John
Re: [expert] Full permission to VFAT partitions
On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, you wrote: > > Win-printer? Win-modem does exist, but I'm not sure if any > win-printer exists. Hard to believe anyway. Can you give me any example > so as to avoid them? > I understand Lexmarks are "Win-Printers" John
Re: [expert] manipulating tgz's on windows
On Wed, 02 Aug 2000, you wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 10:26:09PM -0700, Harondel J. Sibble wrote: > > Anyone know of any reasonably priced software (say us$40 and under) that will > > allow one to manipulate tgz files, including creating tgz's on an ms windows > > box? There is one package out there that I know of, but it is something like > > us$200. For only occaisional use, that's a tad expensive. Something open > > source would be really cool too. > > Tar and gzip for W32 are both available from the NT Emacs site; see my NT > Emacs Installation web page (at the URL below) for details. You can't beat > the price, either. > > Winzip will read, but not manipulate, tarred/gzipped files. > Hmm..are you sure? I thought it would... Just went there. You're correct. It won't create or update tar or tar.gz files, but it will extract 'em. :-) John
Re: [expert] OT: $0.05 e-mail surcharge
On Wed, 02 Aug 2000, you wrote: > It was sort of a long link to cut and paste, so just go to www.ask.com > and type 'bill 602p' in the box and one of the returns it will give you > is an internet rumours site. Check it out. > http://ciac.llnl.gov gives you some VERY good info on hoaxes and urban legends. John
Re: [expert] mounting windows drives
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > How do I set up /etc/fstab so that I can write to my windows drives when > I'm a regular user? > I have no trouble writing as root, but I can't as a regular user. > It's a "Bad Idea (tm)" to let "joe user" have write access to non-linux partitions. Why? Because there's the potential to mess up those disks. John
Re: [expert] OT: $0.05 e-mail surcharge
Please check out an "urban legends" page near you or go to http://ciac.llnl.gov for their "urban legends" page. John
Re: [expert] OT: $0.05 e-mail surcharge
Can you say 'HOAX!!!" I knew you could! John
Re: [expert] BellSouth's FastAccess DSL Internet connectivity.
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Hi All. > > Does anyone have any experience with BellSouth's FastAccess DSL Internet > connectivity and Linux? Specifically, I am looking for the following > information: > Not personally, but a friend of mine has BellSouth DSL and is running a linux box as a firewall. > > 1. Is it any good? > It works... > > 2. What DSL modem to they supply? I am running a laptop, so the PCI > card option is out. I hear they can supply a USB one - is this Linux > compatible? (I will be upgrading my kernel to 2.4.test-4 shortly). > You CAN get a single-ethernet router, but my understanding is that they have become pretty strict about who can get it. You have to have a GOOD reason to get it, something other than "I don't want an internal DSL modem" or "I run linux and an internal DSL modem won't work." They're quite happy to ignore the fact that you run linux, as long as you don't run a SERVER on it. > > 3. Would ANY 10 Base-T network adapter suffice (as long > as it is Linux compatible)? > Should be. > > 4. They are very specific about their download speeds, but what is their > upload speed (not everyone is a leech). > about 50% of their download speed. Tops. That's the way ADSL works -- you get twice as much bandwidth DOWNSTREAM as you do upstream. > > > 5. Has anyone managed to get this going with Linux? > As I said, I know a couple people who are using non-Windows machines on DSL -- one mac and one linux box. > > 6. I want to network my laptop to my Wife's PC so that we > can both use the Internet at the same time - I take it that I will > need two network cards in the laptop to do this. Any > recommendations? (I don't want to do the Internet link directly > from my Wife's PC if I can avoid it as the laptop is FAR more > stable - her PC runs Win95, and my two kids [10 and > 12] use it; > 'nuff said...) > Set up a P100 (or similar easy/cheap PC) to act as a firewall and give it two network cards, then run a cable from one NIC to the DSL router and one to a hub for you and your wife. > > 7. Would it be possible to set up additional e-mail accounts > on the Linux box, so that e-mails could be sent direct to the > box? I need this to get around the paltry 5Mb mailbox limit that > BellSouth offer (an e-mailed document with a few embedded > screenshots soon grows bigger than that!). > Maybe. I'd recommend finding some place to host a domain for you, or similar and allow you to get your mail from them. THEN you can do what you're wanting. > > 8. Does it offer a static IP address? This would make > telneting to the machines a lot easier. (Maybe I'm just being > hopeful - I used to use Demon Internet as my ISP when I lived in > the UK, and even their dial-up accounts had static IP, unlimited > e-mail addresses, etc. Heaven!) > Yes and no. You don't really want a "live" IP on your machine. It makes it too vulnerable to attack. Use SSH instead as well. MUCH safer! :-) Here's what I understand (not being a DSL user myself): You get a "lease" on an IP for as long as your computer is turned on. Next time you reboot, you get a new IP. John
Re: [expert] IDE cylenders !
On Wed, 02 Aug 2000, you wrote: > faisal wrote: > > > > i get an error while partitioning my hard disk during LM 7.0 installation > > which is your cylender are set to 1048 which exceeds 1024 limit .. this > > will cause problem for lilo to boot . > > how can we change it ? > > When you're partitioning your drive to install linux on create a > partition named /boot and define it's size as 15MB. That will take care > of that problem for you. The other partitions can be what ever size you > need them to be. > Or just install anyway, and make a boot disk. Then, go get the updated LILO from the COOKER archive and install it. You'll have to boot off the rescue floppy a time or two, but that'll get around the 1024 cylinder problem as well. :-) John
Re: [expert] Kernel 2.4.0test5 System.map?
On Wed, 02 Aug 2000, you wrote: > OK, so I compiled the new kernel yeasterday, so I could try out the new Linux > Diskless Terminal version (they recommend using 2.3.somethingoranother, but I > figured the 2.4 would be safer). Anyway, I had no problem with the compilation, > added it using linixconf as I always have done ( I recompile at home all the > time to play) and when I rebooted, I got the error messages that the System.map > was the wrong kernel version. I've never run into this before. I've been > recompiling eversince 2.0.?? Anyway, I tried linuxconf again, and then I tried > manually adding the System.map out of the source code. and probably if you > actually know what you're doing, you'll tell me what I know now:that doesn't > work. Anyone give me a clue what I'm missing? I'm really kind of ignorant. > Daniel > Did you re-run LILO after updating the lilo.conf? John
Re: [expert] Sevatio Octavio's posts
On Tue, 01 Aug 2000, you wrote: > John, > > Thanks for letting me know. However, I'm still a bit puzzled as to the > causes. It could be a combination of : 1-I recently switched to > StarOffice5.2. 2-The List keeps putting me on the junk-mail list. > Perhaps you can assist me in pinpointing the problem. > > I'm using StarOffice5.2 for my email client. First of all, what "reply-to" > are you seeing from my email? I've tried both ways: sender: & reply > to:. Sender: reply to:. Only the 2nd > example gets my mail through to the list. > > There is no "From" field to fill in. The mail server that handles my > mail is MS-NT. Maybe it's a compatibility problem between Staroffice5.2 > and NT. Hopefully I'll get my own mail servers up soon. > > Suggestions? > I *was* seeing "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I just noticed that when I tried to reply to you, KMail put MY domain in after your email. Here's what I get when I try to reply to your posts: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" As you can see that's not right... :-) Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from eagle.vnweb.com (corp.vnweb.com [209.247.80.2]) by s20.highertech.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA29896 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 22:43:09 -0400 Received: from c3p0 ([208.194.173.34]) by eagle.vnweb.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S1V35) with SMTP id com; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 19:41:51 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sevatio Octavio) Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 02:43:17 GMT Message-ID: <2802.2431700@c3p0.> Subject: Re: [expert] Sevatio Octavio's posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: <0008012051310H.00716@slave1> References: <0008012051310H.00716@slave1> X-Mailer: Microsoft Innerbutt Exploder 5.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-UIDL: d82b61b43f0b2c90d77c91455880b0c5 Status: R X-Status: N Above are the headers for your message. It LOOKS like you're using MS IE 5.0 to send your message. Have you hacked a header into your messages? Also, what do you have in your reply-to header field? It needs to be your FULL email address. In your Star Office "outbox" properties, you need to yave "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as your "sender" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as your reply-to. I've got SO 5.1 open here and that seems to be where you configure that information. Give that a shot and see if it doesn't help fix the "bad reply address" problem. :-) John
Re: [expert] Mandrake netscape 4.74?
On Tue, 01 Aug 2000, you wrote: > H...maybe I should-a got the RPM instead. I downloaded and > installed the netscape tarball and it made a royal mess! Nutscrape doesn't > work at the moment cause there are bits and peices of the old and newer > version here and there and the twain shall never meet! Damnit! should-a > left well enough alone. It wasn't broke so why did i wanna fix it! geez I > feel stupid! > Yep. Generally, you need to rpm -e netscape* before installing the tarball version. :-) John
Re: [expert] Strange pb with IDE cdrom drive
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Since two days, I have a strange problem with my cdrom drive. > UNDER KDE, the eject button on the cdrom drive does not work any more > and all programs under KDE seem to not see that there > is a CD in the drive ( except when I have inserted and > mounted the CD before launching KDE ) > > The funny thing is that happens only under KDE. > The CD drive works correctly at the Linux prompt -- and under > Windows too ... > > My system has been running for several months whithout > any problems under Mandrake 6.1 > > Have you any ideas about what did happen ? > Hardware malfunction ? > Some CDE config files corrupted ? > Other ? > Didn't we JUST go through this on this list?? Maybe it was the KDE list. The solutions is this: check to make sure you don't have KSCD docked, or have the CDROM drive mounted. This sounds like a typical problem you'll have when you have a cdrom mounted, either for file purposes or for audio purposes. John
Re: [expert] IP Masq connection on demand?
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > I'm working with some internet cafes in Thailand and are using a Linux > box as > a server and connection to the internet. We use the Squid package to > cache > locally. My question is, is the an easy fix to disconnect the ppp0 > device > after about 10 mins of idle time and redial if there is a client request > (for > instance, is the store is empty for a couple of hours, so they don'thave > to > pay the ISP time)? > /usr/doc/ppp-/sample/options see the "idle" command option. John
RE: [expert] Network Questions to Ask?
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, you wrote: > INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER ISP.. > EDUARDO. > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Lore [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 10:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] Network Questions to Ask? > > What ISP? I am an Operations Engineer with RCN. > Eduardo: I think Joe meant WHICH internet provider... :-) Joe: I work for a local ISP in Chattanooga, TN. John
[expert] Sevatio Octavio's posts
Is it just me or is every post by Sevatio getting re-sent several times??? I think it's because his reply-to address is bad. I've sent Denis an email, hopefully he'll fix this and we'll not see any more dupe loops like that... In the meantime, if anyone knows Sevatio, please tell him to fix his email address, because it appears to be causing a dupe loop! John
RE: [expert]
On Tue, 01 Aug 2000, you wrote: > I tried both ways. OBVIOUSLY I am not going to use FDISK or DISK DRAKE on a > functional system with WIN2000 because it will destroy it. Even if it could > do it non-destructively it would not matter. it does not allow you to get > that far, it does not give the option, it just says it can't find any place > to even TRY to construct a system, so that option is out. > > AGAIN WHY doesn't anyone listen IT DOES WORK for Version 7 THEREFORE it has > REGRESSED. THAT is the complaint and there is no answer forthcoming. > > Gilbert: WHAT BRAND OF HARD DRIVE ARE YOU USING Are you trying to use an ATA/66 hard drive??? If so, what controller? Are you aware that Mandrake has tightened the code for some things such that "out of spec" hardware will no longer work? That's why some people are complaining about WD hard drives which worked in Mandrake 7, but no longer work in 7.1, because Mandrake is expecting the hard drive to perform up to spec, and if WD has crippled their hard drive by not manufacturing to spec, then it's Western Digital's fault, NOT Mandrake's. Just because they are more demanding of the hardware does NOT mean it's THEIR fault. Ever stop to wonder what's different about Mandrake than anyone else? Hmm? Well, one BIG difference is they are optimizing their code for Pentium or better. RedHat doesn't. If you want to use hardware that is NOT manufactured to the specifications, back down to RedHat. Until you tell us WHAT BRAND OF HARD DRIVE you have, you're not going to win! John
Re: [expert] Mouse on ps2
On Tue, 01 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Hello All: > I am running LM 7.0 in dual boot on my laptop. I have been using a > serial mouse up until now with no problems. I am wanting to switch to a > ps2 mouse to free up my serial port to use with the Palm Pilot, but when > I hook up the ps2, it doesn't register on the screen (i.e., the cursor > doesn't move). I have run mouseconfig and set it to my ps2 mouse, and I > have alternately enabled and disabled ps2 mouse in my bios to see if > this has any effect. I know my ps2 port is working because I use a ps2 > splitter and have my keyboard hooked up through it. And yes, I have > tried the mouse without the splitter and it still doesn't work. Any > suggestions? > Try DrakConf. It may be that Mandrake has a preferred way to set up the mouse, and DrakConf would likely be the way to get to it. If that doesn't work, I dont' know what else to suggest. John
RE: [expert]
On Tue, 01 Aug 2000, you wrote: > Is there any answer to this yet/ If not, what does one do with LINUX, just > say to oneself ahh well, we don't support you modern and common hardware but > that is ok, just use an older version. Boy that makes for confidence in this > toy. > > This could be the problem -- ISTR reading that Mandrake "tweaked" ext2 for the 7.1 release. Further, you still haven't said who the hard drive manufacturers are. There are known issues with Western Digital's implementation of Ultra/66 IDE, which according to this list are failures by the MANUFACTURER to follow the standard. They are still, from what I read, complying with the 386-architecture standard instead of the Pentium/Pentium2/Pentium3 architecture requirements. If the hardware manufacturers only pay lip service to the standards, why are you blaming linux? Mandrake has tightened up their code such that "modern" hardware which doesn't follow the standards is broken. Why is that Mandrake's fault? Just because it worked in Mandrake 7.0 (which didn't have as tight timing standards / requirements) doesn't mean that Mandrake 7.1 is broken. Just because it works fine in Windows 2000 (which, AFAIK, still doesn't require the same HIGH standards for hardware as "cutting edge" distributions of linux) doesn't mean it's going to work in Mandrake 7.1 or any other version of linux which compiles for the latest hardware. Your misunderstanding is that since it's broken, that Mandrake has "slipped" when in fact, they've tightened up their code even more. It's not Mandrake's fault that your hard drive manufacturers were too cheap or lazy to fully implement the UDMA/66 standard as it's written. This standard, as I understand it, requires TIGHTER timing standards and even tighter code, despite the fact that Microsoft still insists on 8086-compatible code and the hard drive manufacturers count on that. Quit blaming linux and start challenging your hard drive manufacturers to comply with the standards! John
Re: [expert] LILO doesn't recognize default label
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, you wrote: > it sounds like you have the > 1024 syndrome. If you haven't done a lot to > your system yet as far as moving in and settling down you may want to > re-install Linux. LILO doesn't work well on Large HDD's unless you use a > 10-15MB /boot partition. LILO will work perfectly then. You would > partition your drive in a manner something like this. > This is incorrect. The new version of LILO doesn't care WHERE the kernel is located. John
Re: [expert] Need help....
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, you wrote: > HI all, > > I understand to get the CD or to burn my own. > What next.. do i have overwrite my existing > install.. i just wanted to know, what image i should > get from the web.. > > I need the details of all the stuff i need to make > my 6.1 to 7.x i need the diff between these two.. can > i compile the 7.x source on my 6.1 & would that make > my mandrake version 7.x?? > > I need details or the place where i can find the > upgrade plan.. if one exists. > > THanks guys for ur replies.. > TECHNICALLY, you can just do an "upgrade" install. However, my suggestion would be to wipe the drive (except maybe /home and /usr/local) and start from scratch. I think you'll be happier in the long run. John
Re: [expert] netscape messenger or aol messenger ?
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I want to installe & use aol or netscape instant messenger on my drake box > does anyone have a clue where to find them ? > Do you mean AIM? If so, you have several choices. I recommend "everybuddy" as it works with AIM, Yahoo, ICQ and MSN. HTTP://www.everybuddy.com Or you can go with Gaim (go to FreshMeat.net or linuxberg.com to find the home page.) It only does AIM. John
Re: [expert] Parrellel Port Scanners
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, you wrote: > John, > > What was that address again for SANE? I tried the one in the message below > and it took me to some place all about mental illness. > YEah. I was lazy and didn't look it up. Go to "www.google.com" and search for SANE and scanners and linux. Sorry I can't be more help. John
Re: [expert] Parrellel Port Scanners
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, you wrote: > >If it's possible you'll find the information on SANE.ORG (I think > >that's the web address...) > > John > > Actually, the address appears to be http://www.mostang.com/sane/ . > Thanks. I don't have ANY kind of scanner, so I posted what I *thought* to be correct. I figured (quite correctly ) that if it was wrong, someone would correct me. :-) John
Re: [expert] network administrator
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, you wrote: > So pick up a book called 'linux network servers' by craig hunt and a $3.00 > Linux CD from cheap bytes (mandrake is nice) and go for it. See how much you > can get running in a week. > OTOH, RedHat is a TINY bit more stable... ;-) Maybe I'll D/L and burn a Mandrake CD. After all I do have a server I'm planning on putting on-line... :-) John
Re: [expert] OT: harddrive flashback
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, you wrote: > No...another machine I have, but they're not networked yet. I was > wondering what to do when the occassional hard freeze happens. Thankfully > it doesn't happen very often with Linux and I REALLY hate doing hard > boots when it does. > Heh. Well, what're you waiting for??? Network 'em and get SSH or SSH2 installed and get the client for whatever O/S your other machine is and install it. OTOH, recently my RedHat box was so unstable and hard-locking that I couldn't even SSH into it. IT turns out that one of the two processors was bad and eventually, it wouldn't even boot all the way with that processor installed. :-/ Removing the bad processor took care of all my problems, including any heat-related ones. :-) John
Re: [expert] Setting up autofs
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, you wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 12:38:33AM -0400, Sarang Lakare wrote: > > anyway, now my problem is that autofs dosn't work.. nor does normal mount > > work! when i say "mount -t iso9660 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom", it says kernel > > cannot recognize /dev/cdrom as a valid character device.. any help? > > /dev/cdrom is always a link. Do you have SCSI or IDE? If you have SCSI, it > should be a link to /dev/scd0, /dev/scd0 being a _b_lock special device with > major 11 and minor 0. > Not on my system. I've looked. Under (Sorry) RedHat 6.2, I'm using a SCSI CDRW, from which I installed linux. Looking in /dev using ls -al there is NO link to /dev/scd0 or anything like that. Plus my cd mounts as /dev/cdrom from /etc/fstab. John
Re: [expert] Parrellel Port Scanners
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Canon CanoScan FB630P (Parrellel Port Scanner) which I am > probably dreaming but wish to run in Linux. It happens to be the only > thing keeping Windows on my system which is dual booting with LM7.0. > > If there is anyone out there with information (addresses, downloads or > which is the up-to-date graphics/scanner program), please forward it on, > so I can get this scanner running. Though if you believe I am heading > down an endless track please also tell me, but also send reasons. > If it's possible you'll find the information on SANE.ORG (I think that's the web address...) John
Re: [expert] OT: harddrive flashback
Hey, speaking of the ORIGINAL topic here anyone remember MFM hard drives??? I am subscribed to a list from Hitechcafe.com and this morning in their list of items they have on special, the included the following: 0083MB MFM 3.5 X 1.6 15MS HARD DRIVE - $89 ITEM #...ST1100 http://hitechcafe.com/eshop/inproduct.asp?dept%5Fid=7&sku=ST1100 *shudder* I remember MFM hard drives. Boy those were the days... had to be sure you had an RLL hard drive with the MFM controller... or was it an MFM hard drive with an RLL controller??? I recall that you could essentially increase your drive space by about 50% by using RLL with MFM controller or vice versa... :-) Thank goodness THOSE days are gone! :-) John
Re: [expert] network administrator
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Hello there > > I am a Windows NT Network Administrator "MCSE" now i would like to extend my > skill & go for Linux Administration. now the question is that does my > being an Nt administrator help me in any way with Linux.? > Also what should i know to be a good Linux Admin ? I heard linux users have > to do a lots of programing too do i have to do that as well ? > I've been using linux on my desktop here at work for about 18 months now... I do very little "programming" but I have compiled a number of programs from the "tarball." John
Re: [expert] OT: harddrive flashback
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Ok...I'm still a little foggy on this console stuff. I'm only half > there. So, if my desktop freezes as it has once or twice since I've > started working with Linux,(about 14 months), and CTL-ALT-BACKSPACE > doesn't take me out of X, then will CTL-ALT-Fx (x = 1-6) get me there > without having to do a hardboot and risk filesystem damage? > Maybe. If your capslock and numlock work (i.e. the lights blink when you switch 'em) it SHOULD work, but you may be completely locked. OTOH, if you have another computer and can telnet or ssh in, that might be the best way to gracefully reboot. John
RE: [expert] I'll be back
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Outlook 2000 DOES do threading. I'm using for this list now. I have to use > Outlook as my company has standardized on M$ Exchange. > Does Exchange not do POP and SMTP? John
Re: [expert] Test
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I've tried capital "E's" small "e's" > no post yet for about 3 days, I hope I > can "hitch a ride" on someone elses email > and get through whatever parsing engine that > has been enabled! > vern > > Well, I'm seeing your posts here... *shrug*
Re: [expert] OT: harddrive flashback
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > honestly I can't begin to imagine writting a program on punch > cards. seems to me that something like that would take literally forever! > I took a class back in the early 80's on how to program in RPG. The funny thing was, that even though we were using terminals, we still had punch-card emulators and had to have everything in EXACTLY the right column and the right "card." Talk about annoying! :-) John
Re: [expert] OT: harddrive flashback
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > What does CTL+ALT+F3 do? > switches you to a new virtual terminal complete with login, etc. John
Re: [expert] Backup and restore systems
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Mondo-Rescue (below) seems to be only for CDRs. Which is a good > procedure/application for disaster recovery when backing up with tape > using tar/gz, taper, or kdat? > I would be inclined to go with the console app, because you may not always be ABLE to start the GUI. :-) John
Re: [expert] new reiser question
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > That is why ReiserFS is not an available option during install unless > you choose an expert install. It is expected that people who select > expert are exactly that: expert. > > If you don't know enough to make an informed decision (read: you have > read all of the relevant documentation and are aware of the risks) > about it, you shouldn't use it. > > _Most_ of the cases I have heard about Reiser breaking in somebody's > Mandrake box were situations in which they were _trying_ to break it. > And in many of those, the discs lasted (i.e. were recoverable) than an > ext2 fs likely would have been. > > For example, one person was intentionally (and repeatedly) cutting > power to his box while performing dozens of parallel compiles. I have > seen ext2 systems die after doing something similar just once. > > As far as "its ok to test it on home machines," a journalling > filesystem is convenient for them, but they are generally not equipped > to "test" it. How many home users have the kind of filesystem load > you see on a real file server? > Don't know if any of you are aware of who / what SpamCop is / does. However, recently their host suffered a power outage and the server was shut down uncleanly. Julian, the owner/operator of the SpamCop server was grateful. He said that his machine was back up and running VERY quickly, much faster than an ext2fs would have been. :-) John
Re: [expert] Asf files
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Hm, sounds like some reverse engineering is in order. > > Now if I could only find a reverse compiler I could make myself > a copy for linux, of course I would share the wealth, but only > by e mail request, don't wanna post it to a web site. > > I heard on NPR that someone "stole" the encryption algorythm from M$ and that it was going to be a big threat on the 'Net 'cause people were going to be able to share movies a lot better now :-) Might wanna look towards some of the "Warez" people and see if you can track it down that way. :-) John
Re: [expert] new reiser question
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I think I will wait until reiser is as good as ext2--- > I can't afford to experiment with the very core > of the system, but I hope it turns out to be > a good filesystem > Spamcop.net runs on ReiserFS, IIRC.
RE: [expert] AMD Chips and Mandrake (correction)
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Of course, that's what I meant. Thanx for catching me! > No sweat. :-) I've mis-typed more than enough for both of us. :-) John
Re: [expert] sound AC'97 on mother board Abit VT6X4
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > You can use the ALSA drivers for AC97. I think the URL is www.alsa.org. > Close, but no cigar -- www.alsa-project.org. John
Re: [expert] netscape 474
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I use Staroffice, but the install says that I don't have JAVA > installed. What package would I install that works well with SO? I've > done some searching of Linux sites, but haven't yet found what it > wants. Got a package name and a download URL? > The JRE from Blackdown.org and associated files. I chose not to download and install those on my machine because of reports that it has contributed to making *nix almost as unstable as Windows. John
Re: [expert] Laplink
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote: > When I set up this file system, the hard drive was in a 486/33, with > 8megs of ram. Now its in a 586/100 with 64 megs of ram. I want to > increase my swap partition from 32megs to at least 64megs. I have loads > of free disk space, but I can't free it up. Unless there is a way to > unmount the hard drive I'm using, while I'm using it!? > Yep. Get a boot & root floppy, such as "Tom's Root & Boot" and boot to that. Then, having THAT mounted, you can perform all sorts of tasks... OR, (and this is a BIG "maybe) telinit to runlevel1 (single-user mode) and do the disk maintenance that way. > > I have considered using Partition Magic > on the drive, but that raises other issues such as: > > 1. My PM disk is on loan to a friend, and he has taken a unplanned > holiday out of town. > > 2. When I installed Linux on this drive, I forget where I installed > Lilo. From what I've read on the Newbie list, if Lilo is on the MBR, I > can kiss it good bye by running PM. Can I tell where Lilo is by looking > in fstab? > Nope, but if you look at your /etc/lilo.conf you should be able to tell. If it says "boot=/dev/hda" it's in the MBR. > > 3. I should back up my files before messing around with the hard drive > geometry. > Definitely. :-) > > 4. The backup method I'm used to, isn't supported in Linux, unless > parallel port tape drives have recently been supported? > Not AFAIK. Could be wrong tholinux supports the paralell port Jaz and Zip drives... :-) Good luck! John
RE: [expert] AMD Chips and Mandrake
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Civileme recommends this board, but it has no ide sockets > and only 5 PCI. I goatta have at least one ide. Let's > try again, wouldja? Thanx, all. > Err... do you mean ISA? IDE is hard drive. :-) John
Re: [expert] OT: harddrive flashback
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Submitted 23-Jul-00 by Pj: > > From: Using MS-DOS 6.2 (QUE book) 1993 > > > > Pg. 140; pgph 5: > > > > "Hard disks have changed the most. A number of technology have come and > > gone as hard disks have steadily gotten larger and faster. Drives capable > > of storing more than two gygabytes(two billion bytes) now cost less than > > $2,500. > > > > Who remembers when 10GB cost $10,000? > > > > I remember when a 20 MB drive was top of the line and cost more than > the rest of the machine :) > Yeah...I had an IBM PS/2 model 25 (built-in monitor) and I thought "wow! A whole 25 meg hard drive! What am I going to do with all that space!?!?!?!" :-) Boy, how times have changed. :-) I've now got about 40 GIGS in my linux box and I'm concerned about running low on storage space for all my MP3's. :-) John
Re: [expert] Laplink
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Sevatio Octavio wrote: > > > > I didn't catch your original question. Are you wondering about remote > > controlling another pc? Or is this a laplink specific question? > > I want to transfer files between two linux boxes, using a laplink cable. > I was hoping there would be program such as laplink or Xtree gold to > help me set it up. I should do some further research into Midnight > Commander, it has a file transfer command, I just need to find the docs. > on how to set it up. > Have you considered putting a lan card in each and using ssh/sftp or even just plain old ftp to copy the files over? What about setting up nfs and using NFS to copy 'em over the network? You *can* set up something similar to laplink using a terminal adapter util such as minicom and setting up on linux box to "answer" the phone however, from what I recall, you'll find a 10-megabit network a LOT faster! John
Re: [expert] XFree 4.0 wheel mouse issue
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I tried running imwheel -k from terminal, apparently it was already running, and >restarting didn't help. > > Although I hate Microslut, I'm completely lost without my damanble wheely-mouse! > > Thanx for the shot, though! > There are some additional commands you need to include in your XF86Config file. Unfortunately, I'm not sure what they are... I would suggest looking in the archives of this list for the answers... Good luck! John
Re: [expert] XFree 4.0 wheel mouse issue
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I just installed Mandrake 7.1, and installed XFree86 4.0. No problems there, but the >wheel mouse won't work. > > Even with ZAxisMapping 4 5 in the XF86Config file, the wheel is ignored. > > imwheel-0.9.8 is installed, but not called in the XF86Config file...but there's a >security risk with this (not that it'll be much of a risk behind my firewall, but a >concern anyway). > > Anyone have a solution? Or, do I just have to go back to XFree86 3.3.6 > Umm...I *think* you HAVE to run the imwheel util. If you don't run it, it's not going to help. John
Re: [expert] Mandrake's Arrogance
On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, you wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Ken Archer wrote: > > > Funny how you remember things your father used to say. Mine used to look at me > > and say, "Experience is a cruel teacher, but a fool can learn from no other." > > > > Good one. While certain (safe) commands have had permissions modified > to allow me to run them as a normal user (of a particular group). > Having to type su or sudo (or whatever other program you use for the > purpose) is a reminder that what you are about to do may have > repercussions. > Yeah. I've changed the permissions on my XCDRoast such that I can now burn CDs as a non-root user. I really HATED having to open a console, type "xhost +localhost" and then su to root and run xcdroast. :-) THAT was a lot of pain. Then I got smart and made XCDRoast run SUID. :-) I did the same thing with RDATE. I *still* can't run HWCLOCK as a non-root user, but it's no big deal to su to root for that. Now, installing RPMs requires me to SU, but just running RPM queries does not. I'm glad RH fixed that in 6.2 In RH 6.0, I was not able to run RPM queries as a non-root user. John
RE: [expert] AMD Chips and Mandrake
On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I have had complaints from customers about the fact that mandrake is > compiled for the Pentium class systems when using an Athlon. Have any of > you had the same problem. My experience is with the K6-2 and K6-3. I want > to install on an Athlon but have my doubts. Any comments is appriciated. > An Athlon *IS* a 586-class CPU (or better.) IT should work just fine. Matter of fact, a friend of mine was having problems with his Windows box on his Athlon, but worked beauftifully under Linux. :-) John
Re: [expert] Freedoms Past
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, you wrote: > A disturbing trend in this modern age > is that we feel compelled to protect us from > ourselves. Microsoft offered up a convenient > black box that protected us from the horrors of > it's inner truth. Linux was to be the answer to > that ignorance-by-consent. > [snip] > > Many of us are upset that our former freedoms > have been robbed of us in the latest release. If > there was ever a higher purpose to the Linux > operating system, these changes are it's defeat. > You CAN still "play as root." It's just a bit more difficult. If you don't like it, install some other distro that's "wide open" (IF you can find one!) and run it! This is NOT just a "Mandrake" thing (not running as root) it's a *nix thing. AFAIK, you are strongly discouraged from running as "root" in BSD and SCO as well. Heck, even in RedHat there is a BIG notice when you first start up as "root" that you're running the Gnome file manager as "root" and that it's very dangerous. In ohter words, chill, dude! Just because Mandrake has gone a step further and made it more difficult to break things as root doesn't mean you've lost any freedom. You CAN by-pass those precautions. John
Re: [expert] Mandrake's Arrogance
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, you wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Civileme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 1:34 AM > Subject: [expert] RIGHT CLICK--NEW -> Folder > > > > > > Are you folks who are complaining running as _root_? > > > > This is something not to be done, for many reasons, including the fact > that you > > get kicked from most IRC servers. > > > > I find it arrogant that Mandrake would deliberatly cripple the functionality > of programs in order to prohibit certain behavior that they have decided is > inappropriate. This kind of "I know better than you" unwelcomed > paternalistic coercion is awfully Microsoft-ish. Is this the direction > Mandrake is heading? Yuck! > Ok. So Mandrake "cripples" some stuff as root to discourage you from running as "root." They have also done so in the security levels, and I don' t hear anyone bitching about MS-like behavior with regards to functionality of some programs under the "high" and "paranoid" security levels. As is pointed out, there is good reason NOT to run as "root." Pretty much every distro out there will prevent you from telnetting into the box as "root" for security reasons (at least Mandrake and RedHat will. I *think* most other distros do as well!) I think it's a Bad Idea (tm) to cry "microsoft" anytime a linux distribution "cripples" something for security reasons. I don't hear anyone bitching about not being able to install RPMs as a user, yet that's *definitely* an "I know better than you" situation of a program being crippled. My $0.02: Shut up and stop running as "root" unless you're actively configuring stuff which requires "root" permissions. If you just want to be able to install an RPM or something, open a console window, su to root and run the rpm installer. Stop trying to defeat the security that's inherent in linux and run as a "user!" John
RE: [expert] Version 7.1 HUGE install problem
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I did not do this because I cannot even get that far. I also must use PM > because your partition utility will not give me the needed FAT32 partitions > for DOS and Windows. If PM 5 will not work then I am in big trouble. I also > use Boot Magic. That also must work, LILO cannot do all I need and not > nearly as nicely. > I may try to see if I can find a way to partition with the installer to see > what happened but I did redo the entire drive with PM and if that is the > problem WHY did it work PERFECTLY on 7.0 and continues to work perfectly on > 7.0. > Here's a suggestion: Make your Fat32 partitions with PM. Then leave the rest of the drive unpartitioned and partition it with the installer. It's MUCH better to let the installer partition it, because of the quirks of the EXT2 FS. Also, if you INSIST on using PM, at least get all the updates! John
Re: [expert] GCC/make gets random signal 11s
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Tony McGee wrote: > > I always thought that Mandrake was not just i586 optimized code but i586 > > ONLY code. I think it's much safer to stick with RedHat for anything less > > than a Pentium cpu. > > Well, I used RedHat before, but I could not get my ISDN TA card to function, > so that is not an option, besides, I like Mandrake. Well, I am not > any other problems which could relate to the i486/i586 code , so > I doubt that is the main reason for those signal 11s. It could be the cause > of pppd crashing the entire system when doing as 'killall pppd' though, but > I doubt it. Well, thanks anyway. > You might try RedHat 6.2. It's got most of the same software that Mandrake 7.01 had, except that they are (mostly) the "full-release versions" instead of release candidates. John
Re: [expert] SLOW boot
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, you wrote: > My boot proceeds pretty well until it gets to the starting AMD stage. What > is AMD and why would it take over 1 minute at times? Sometimes it is > instantaneous or nearly so. > AMD==AutoMount Daemon. I think it's searching for stuff to mount. John
Re: [expert] Good vidoe card to use
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Since my Diamond Viper II on one system and Maxi Gamer Voodoo Banshee on > the other do not work in version 7.1 and X 3.6 or 4, can anyone recommend a > GOOD FAST card that works in both Linux 7.1 and windows 2000. > I am not sure I am ready to buy a new card but I don't want to make another > error. > Thanks, and if you have actually used the card and it works in 7.1 and if > possible with X 4 that would be the best. > TNT-based cards should work well. Try a GeForce or GeForce II. John
Re: [expert] Linux file system update?
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, you wrote: > After adding a new hard drive to my system and creating > an ext2fs type partition, how do I add this to my file > system table?? I would like to have Mdk 7.1 to start using > this partition. I created the partition with PartitionMagic > and did not specify a mount point at the time of creation. > Do I need to go back into PartionMagic and do this?? > Any help with the above would be most appreciated!! > Edit your /etc/fstab with your favorite editor (note: You *will* have to be "root" in order to do this, so I recommend opening a console window, SU-ing to root and use a console-based text editor.) Once you have your /etc/fstab file in the editor, specify the mount point and the correct /dev file the way the other mount points are specified. John
Re: [expert] Intellimouse is drunk!
On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Well sir, > > I have been against the same type of problem many times. Althought I don't > have the awesome computer you do, I think I may be of some help. (I > hope...) > > First off you need to make sure your mouse doesn't have a switch on the bottom > that says "MS or PC" and if it does, try the other setting to see if that > helps. Also make sure your X configuration is correct. I haven't seen the > problem since I used RH 5.2, but if you didn't get the right resoultion on the > video card the mouse would not piont to where the computer thought it was. > If it's a TRUE MS Intellimouse, it doesn't have one of those switches. OTOH, if it's a "knock-off" it may very well. John
Re: [expert] can't recognize UMAX-VistaS6 on AHA1520b
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, you wrote: > My Mandrake 7.02 can't recognize my Umax Vista-S6 scanner wich is hosted by > a Adaptec aha1520b scsi card. This card works well and is recognized trough > its bios (My CD-burner is found) > - sg driver (generic scsi driver) is installed V.2136 > - My scanner is in ready mode when the sytem boots > - scsi chain : terminator (by scsi card' bios) -cd-burner - computer - > scanner terminator (by scsi card's bios) > AHHHI think I know the problem -- you need to tell the SCSI BIOS *not* to terminate. Since it's in the MIDDLE of the SCSI chain (with your scanner being on the outside) you're blocking acces to the SCANNER by terminating at the card. John
RE: [expert] i810 on Mandrake 7.0
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I installed mandrake 7.1 on an i810e and it detected the network and sound > just fine. > only problem i found was the modem included with my board it is a win modem > with a PCTEL chip > Driver for linux are avilable but only for kernel version 2.2.7. Icould not > make it work with 2.2.15 > You really don't want to use it anyway -- under Windows OR linux. it's a piece of junk! John
Re: [expert] CD burner Howto..
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Hoyt wrote: > > > > Maybe www.linuxforum.org/plug/articles/scsiemu.html will help. > > > > Hoyt > > > > This is *EXACTLY* what I was looking for..! Thanks! > > However, I do have question for anyone here.. > > I know that the CD rom is hdc.. > > This how-to says to add hdd=ide-scsi to lilo.. > > But, I allready HAVE a hdd, being an atapi zip on ide 2 which is shared > with cd. > > IDE 1 has 2 HD's.. Master ( 8 gig, win/beOS ) > Slave ( 7 gig, linux ) > > IDE 2, Master ( CD ) , slave zip100. > > Do I need to make this say hde=ide-scsi?? > Nope, you need to make it "hdC=ide-scsi" The "hdd" was just an example. John
Re: [expert] OpenSSH won't accept connections?
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > > initial Linux Mandrake installation security option: > > High > This may be the reason. I've seen a lot of reports that the "high" security level is TOO tight -- it won't let ANYTHING in (remotely.) You might see if you can reduce the security level and / or double-check the host.allow file. I know you said you checked hosts.deny. What about specifying machine IP's you want to let IN in your hosts.allow? I had to specify the machines I wanted to let ssh into my machine using "real" ssh. John
RE: [expert] FW: xfree86 RPM not found
On Sun, 09 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > Another question, can you tell me why it takes 3-8 hours for a message to > show up. Is this thing moderated? It is too bad it is if that is it. It > takes so long to get messages. Most mailing lists I use show a message > within 30 seconds or less. > It is a sad commentary on behaviour when a list must be moderated. > > The server is probably overloaded. Think about how many messages pass through it per day... must be THOUSANDS of messages and they all have to get repackaged and resent. :-) John
Re: [expert] Modem problem
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, you wrote: > why isnt' there a GUI utility to load/unload drivers.. I was trying to get > a modem to work under linux and didn't know how to test it other than kppp. > Under kppp it said modem ready.. then it started querying the modem.. but > the result of all ATIs was blank string.. the modem console was also > blank.. no OK nothing! > > any help? > Any chance it's a software (AKA "Win") modem? John
Re: [expert] SCSI Possible Problem, Help Needed
On Sun, 09 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Hi all: > I have Mandrake 7.1 and over this weekend I have installed a SCSI card. This > is first SCSI card in the system. The hardware configuration program came up > and detected the new card on boot-up and configured it. I have found out that > the card was correctly identified at hardware detection and is properly listed > in the hardware list. My problem is that the only device attached to the card > a UMAX S 6E scanner is not seen by sane when I try to configure it. I have also > noted that when I reboot the SCSI card is not noticed. The system states, > SCSI: 0 Host > SCSI: DEDECTED or something to that effect. I have looked around the Mandrake > Users org but can not find anything that points me in the direction to go. Can > anyone point me where to look to correct this problem? Thanks in advance. > Is the scanner terminated? If not, then get a SCSI terminator to put on the other "port" on the scanner. In case you didn't know it, you MUST "terminate" both ends of a SCSI chain. The card will terminate that end automagically, but you MUST put a terminator on the other end, or stuff will misbehave, such as not being detected! John
Re: [expert] adding themes w/sawfish and helixgnome
On Fri, 07 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > Is sawfish the default wm for helixgnome? I don't even know! I've > tried to use the Solaris-CDE theme from the gtk theme package > unsuccessfully. Help! > Yes, it is, and yes, I've had problems as well. I can't get it to install ANY themes. Besides which, I detest the default mouse behavior (double-click to launch, instead of KDE's single-click) as well as some of the keyboard stuff. For example in KDE I click CTRL+ right arrow to go to the end of the line in KMail. In Helixcode nothing happens with that combo! John
Re: [expert] Deleted /tmp now X won't start
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > It seems pretty obvious that they DIDN'T think about it. > It's been fixed in 7.1 anyway, as I understand it. > Sort of. It's now in /root/tmp, instead of /tmp. *shrug* John
Re: [expert] Framebuffer/SMP
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Are all precompiled SMP kernels now going to be framebuffer-enabled? I > DON'T WANT framebuffer. I DO WANT SMP. There's my vote. > If it comes to it, just recompile and disable FB. ;-) John
Re: [expert] Deleted /tmp now X won't start
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, you wrote: > John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > > > > > Try it at > > > > > > http://forum.mandrakesoft.com > > > > > > Our own version of slashdot > > > > > I emaild Chmouel. Maybe he'll deign to post in here their thinking on > > that subject. :-) It would be NICE if they'd use this mail list! > > i can deign everything since there is emacs binding ;) > Thank you, sir. :-) John
Re: [expert] Extending Timeout on kmail
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Hi, > With kmail, I frequently get "Timeout while waiting for server" > error messages. This is especially so when I'm not dialling in, but > accessing my mail from my work place. > Does anybocy know where I can change the default values to > extend the timeout periods? I think it probably means that I have to > recompile, but can anyone point me to where to start? > This SHOULD have gone to the KMail list, so I'm CC-ing my reply there... :-) Anyway, I, too, would like to see a more configurable timeout.
Re: [expert] RH and other distro users
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Alan, > > I've heard that Mandrake is RedHat enhanced. I don't know this for a fact, > but I've seem a lot of similarities between the two. You could say they're > 1st cousins. > Not any more. It *used* to be "RedHat + enhancements." Now it's a separate distro. However, it's about 95%+ RedHat compatible in that RedHat rpms will work on Mandrake and vice versa. John
Re: [expert] Deleted /tmp now X won't start
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, you wrote: > John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Maybe a question for the cooker list? I don't really know how else to > > > direct a question to the Mandrake team. > > Maybe, but I've had the distinct impression that some of the > > Mandrake team hang out in this list apparently the ones who hang > > out either don't know the answer or choose to remain silent on that > > one No idea which. :-) > > ? ok what is the question excatly i didn't followed the thread... > > /Chmouel Technical Support/ > Thanks. :-) The question was why you folks put the stuff in /tmp and later in /root/tmp that causes X to go bad when you delete it? You recall the hubub when 7.x came out and people started emptying their /tmp directory only to find they had to reinstall X to get it working again??? We recently had another case of that in here and told 'em the sad, sad story about how you DON'T delete stuff in /tmp or /root/tmp. :-) John
Re: [expert] RH and other distro users
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, you wrote: > I'm running RH 6.2 at the moment. I susbscribe to this list since > there are lotta good people here and I've learned a tremendous amount. > 2 reasons I'm running RH.. When 7.0 came out there were just too many > problem's being reported. I'm not good enough in Linux to fix some of > these on my own. Also, as of tonite I own a CD burner. I didn't > before, and I burnt a RH CD at work beacuse I needed to make a few work > projects that I wanted to run Linux on. Now that I have a burner, I > will probably upgrade ( new install ) of Linux when KDE 2.0 comes out > and appears on Mdk.. I will probably go back to MDK since I think they > are really making it easier for some of us less knowledgable.. > I second this. While I may be more technically competent than some of the "newbies," I recently upgraded from Mandrake 6.0 to RedHat 6.2 for many of the same reasons you (Alan N.) list. I was happy with Mandrake 6.0, except I wanted KDE 1.1.2 and the highest I'd been able to upgrade it to was 1.1.1. When I tried to upgrade to 1.1.2, I screwed the pooch and lost my X completely. What was I to do? Reinstall. At that time, the latest release was 7.02. I didn't want to upgrade to that because of all the "bugs" that I'd read about on this list. So, I upgraded to RH 6.2. When KDE2 comes out, I'll likely reformat and reinstall, salvaging my /home directory and some other "storage" type directories. :-) I'm expecting that KDE2 will likely come out around the end of this year, and since Mandrake appears to offer a new version about twice a year, a new version of Mandrake will (hopefully) be available around the first of 2001! :-) Of course, I'll probably wait until 2nd quarter of 2001 to make sure that all the bugs are worked out, but... :-) John
